The Davos Warnings: “We Need To Dial Down On The Risk”

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

The Melt-up Continues

Since the beginning of the year, the acceleration in the markets has continued unabated. As I showed yesterday, the acceleration in the S&P 500 has now gone parabolic.

Of course, market melt-ups are symbolic of the final phases of “capitulation” as investors who feel like they “missed the boat,” finally jump back on board.

Such can be confirmed by the numerous emails from individuals asking me is “now the time to get back in?”  

As shown in the chart below, such is the epitome of the “buy high, sell low” syndrome. Never before in recent history has the market been this overbought and extended from longer-term averages which suggests that a correction that reduces such conditions is highly likely in the near-term.

This doesn’t necessarily mean a “full blown” market crash, but even a correction back to the 200-dma, which is certainly within the scope of normal corrective actions, would currently entail a drawdown of almost -13%.

But let’s step back to a weekly chart and look at previous periods where historically high overbought conditions have existed previously.

On a weekly basis, a correction back to the 52-week moving average would require a bit more than a -14% decline while a correction back to the long-term trending average would be roughly -28% from current levels.

As I have said before, given we are now in the longest stretch in market history without even a 3% correction, 13% to 14% is going to “feel” worse than it is, and 28% will be equivalent to a full-fledged crash. 

But just to keep that in perspective, a 28% decline from current levels only sets investors back to 2015. But, given that most investors are driven largely by emotion, those that have jumped in just recently, will be looking to “bail out” with that kind of a drop.

Buy high. Sell low.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

However, there’s nothing to worry about currently as long as the markets keep ratcheting up to new highs. As I penned last week in “The Honey Badger Market,” 

For now, it is hoped that historically high levels of stock valuations will be reduced by an explosion in underlying earnings growth due to the impact of tax reform.

While exuberance is currently ‘off the charts’ bullish, and our portfolios remain inherently long in the meantime, we are extremely cognizant of the risk of something ‘breaking.’

It is what always happens.

Yes, currently, everything is absolutely, positively, optimistic. Economic growth has picked up over the last couple of quarters due to an unprecedented level of natural disasters, oil prices have risen boosting production and corporate earnings, and employment is at historically high levels if you don’t count those out of the labor force.

The positive backdrop for stocks could not be currently better.”

Such is certainly the case for now.


The Davos Warnings

 

Meanwhile, in Davos, the confab of billionaires, world leaders, and the media have gathered for the annual confab in which the fate of the world is determined.

We were fortunate enough to obtain a clip from one of the speeches.

However, not all the views from Davos were of global tranquility and peace.

Barclays CEO Jes Staley, warned that financial markets remind him somewhat of what was seen before the 2008 crash.

“This feels a little bit like 2006. There are lots of reasons to be optimistic.

Global economic growth across the board is doing great at roughly 4%, unemployment rates in the U.K. and the U.S. are at almost record lows. All that is great. But all that comes amid ‘incredibly accommodating’ monetary policy, with interest rates that almost assume we’re still in recession.

If interest rates move too quickly and volatility whips around, things could get ‘interesting’ for markets over the next two years. It’s ‘concerning’ that people are selling short volatility even as it’s historically low, asset values are at all-time highs, and every major industry around the world last year grew by more than 20%.”

Axel Weber, chairman of the board of UBS AG, the Swiss bank, warned:

“Complacency in the markets is a key risk: Valuations are at unprecedented levels. The probability that we’ll encounter an unforeseen crisis on the next part of our journey is high.

André Bourbonnais, chief executive of PSP Investments, which manages close to $112 billion USD of Canadian pension-fund assets, said:

“Everyone feels, despite the exuberance in the market, that we need to dial down on the risk. 

Michael O’Sullivan, chief investment officer for international wealth management at Credit Suisse stated:

“The markets are being driven by a synchronized economic recovery in the U.S., Asia and Europe. Markets are focused on the business cycle rather than politics. Most asset markets are therefore ignoring politics—with the exception of the foreign-exchange market. One possible reason for the lack of market focus on politics may be the growth of automated trading as robots are much less interested in politics than humans.”

Carlyle’s David Rubenstein, who co-founded the private-equity firm more than 30 years ago, warned:
“The biggest concern I have is that most people think there’s no problem of a likely recession this year or early next year. Generally, when people are happy and confident, something wrong happens.’’
Kenneth Rogoff, who co-wrote the definitive history of the financial crisis, expressed the most concern:
“If interest rates go up even modestly, halfway to their normal level, you will see a collapse in the stock market. I don’t know how everything from art and bitcoin to stock prices will react as interest rates go up.”

Of course, with interest rates around the globe at historic lows, companies have binged on cheap borrowing, easy credit terms and “seller’s market” as investor chase yield.

You will notice that each major market peak in history was accompanied by high-leverage ratios.

The biggest risk, as noted last week, is a significant rise in interest rates the “pricks” the debt-bubble.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2EfueZz Tyler Durden

Meet Europe’s Latest Threat: She Is A Blue-Eyes Blonde Who Wants “Finland First”

First it was Nigel Farrage, then Beppe Grillo, Frauke Petry, Alexis Tsipras, Marine le Pen, Geert Wilders, Victor Orban, Sebastian Kurz and so on, as one after another European populist, anti-immigrant leader emerged in response to the economic cataclysm unleashed by central banks over the past decade which left the “1%” better off than ever, at the expense of everyone else.

Now a new threat has emerged out of Finland, one which is petite, with blonde hair and blue eyes.

Laura Huhtasaari, a 38-year-old former teacher, is trying to bring anti-immigration, populist ideas back to mainstream Finnish politics and her campaign for the country’s presidency has seen her reputation soar ahead of the first round of voting on Sunday.

In brief: she hates the European Union, cheered Brexit and supports Donald Trump — and believes Finland is more than ready for her brand of populism. And, according to Politico, of the eight contenders to be Finland’s next president, “none stand out quite like Huhtasaari.”

The candidate of the far-right Finns Party is an outlier in both style and substance. She won’t win Sunday’s presidential election but she’s using her time in the spotlight to push her party’s anti-immigrant, anti-establishment message.

As the UK’s Express adds, her Finns Party has employed tactics from a variety of populist politicians, and is echoing Donald Trump with her “Finland first” slogan as well as French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen, who used nationalism as a key theme in her campaign. At the basis of her ideology, her eurosceptic rhetoric sounds a lot like that of former Ukip leader Nigel Farage, even telling of her admiration for the 53-year-old’s Brexit campaign as she told supporters to “take their country back”.


Finns Party deputy chairman and presidential candidate Laura Huhtasaari

Like her Euroskeptic, nationalist peers, she too claims the EU has turned “Finland into its province” and has railed against the country’s political elite, who she argues do not represent the working class.

Huhtasaari has also demanded more immigration controls and has campaigned in favour of a burka ban – a far cry from Finland’s traditionally subdued politics. She told Politico: “I’m here to remind people that the Finns Party is truly an alternative to the mainstream.

“I want to change the direction of Finland and take back our independence.”

Huhtasaari is in her element on the campaign trail. Speaking in downtown Helsinki to a devoted crowd that braved the height of winter to hear her speak, she rolled out the greatest hits of her populist platform: ranting against a heavy-handed European Union, an out-of-touch Finnish political elite indifferent to the working class, and the perils of large-scale — mainly Muslim — immigration.

She broke up her speech by going off-script and engaging with the crowd, shaking hands and offsetting her fiery rhetoric with a smile before telling her supporters to “take their country back” and ending the 30-minute gathering with her rallying cry of choice: “Finland first!”

Speaking to Politico she also said that “Finland is a little bit late if you compare it to other European countries – anti-immigration parties are winning and people are waking up everywhere. They’re waking up now here, too.”


The 38-year-old has been compared to Marine Le Pen

 

Before entering parliament, Huhtasaari was a teacher of religion and taught children with special needs, and she’s extended this personal touch to her politics. This has allowed Huhtasaari, the vice president of the Finns Party, to emerge as its public face, while Jussi Halla-aho, the party’s leader and a member of European Parliament, stays in the background as a strategist.

Halla-aho has a reputation for being the enfant terrible of Finnish politics, shocking the establishment in the past by describing Islam as a religion of pedophiles, saying that Somalis were genetically predisposed to theft, and  that Greece’s debt problems could only be solved with a military junta.

After a strong showing in the 2011 parliamentary election, the Finns Party became the country’s second-most popular party in 2015 and joined the ruling coalition in parliament. However, the compromises needed to govern within a coalition and an unpopular austerity package removed their shine as a populist opposition party and saw their support fall.

Rebuilding and charting a new course forward has been the central mission of Huhtasaari’s run for president, but gaining back the lost momentum is no simple task. While populist winds might be blowing elsewhere, the conditions don’t look so favorable in Finland where the economy is recovering, the refugee crisis has slowed, and arduous Brexit negotiations have dampened any appeal for leaving the EU.

But while Huhtasaari and the Finns Party face a steep uphill climb, they’ve managed to have an effect on the election and Finnish politics at large. Years in government have allowed the party to pursue a stricter immigration policy, which in addition to Huhtasaari’s tough stance, has shifted the debate during the election. According to Johanna Vuorelma, editor-in-chief of the Finnish news site Politiikasta, the Finns Party has succeeded in moving the country’s immigration debate to the right, but has also given room for other candidates and parties to steal potential voters by adopting similar policies and rhetoric.

* * *

The rise of the Finns Party candidate has certainly not gone unnoticed, according to Tuija Saresma, an expert on right-wing populism at the University of Jyväskylä, who claims that “She’s circulating the rhetoric of many other populist leaders. It doesn’t matter if what she says is true or not, her supporters still stand by her. This is a new phenomenon for Finland.”

“Before the rise of the Finns Party, we were used to a very subdued form of politics,” Saresma said. “But that’s changing. Politics is becoming more emotional.”

Still, despite Huhtasaari’s incredible rise, she is unlikely to snatch the presidency. Incumbent president Sauli Niinistö is extremely popular and recent polls suggest he will be re-elected without a major challenge. Furthermore, Huhtasaari’s poliitcal inexperience has shown at times during the election campaign: she’s struggled with policy issues in televised debates, was criticized for being unable to stop reciting slogans during an interview with the state broadcaster YLE, and has been accused of plagiarizing her thesis.

Still, she’s managed to emerge from the fray largely intact and has no plans of changing her brand as Finland’s leading populist insurgent. To be sure, Huhtasaari’s newfound niche in Finnish politics represents the latest major headache and newest threat for the EU and her profile shows no signs of diminishing.

“I look at Nigel Farage’s example. It took 17 years, but Brexit came,” Huhtasaari said. “I don’t plan to wait that long.”

Finland’s presidential elections are set to be held today, 28 January, with a second round on 11 February if necessary.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2EhjhH5 Tyler Durden

Wisconsin “Price Police” Say Meijer Doesn’t Charge Enough for Dog Food

Submitted by Mish Shedlock of MishTalk

Want to markup gas by 8 cents a gallon in Wisconsin?

You cannot because 8 cents does not meet the state’s minimum markup requirements. The same logic applies to Meijer and Walmart for groceries and school supplies.

The minimum markup laws are a relic from seriously-misguided depression-era laws, still on the books in 26 states.

Price Police

The Wisconsin price police say Meijer Prices are Illegal and demand the grocery store charge more for all kinds of items.

In Wisconsin, the price police have gone after Meijer, a superstore that sells everything from groceries to electronics to pharmaceuticals. Rivals filed complaints accusing it of pricing 37 items—including bananas, dog food, ice cream and Cheerios—below cost. Meijer, which runs 200 stores in five states, says this was the first time it had ever been accused of hurting consumers by charging too little. Nonetheless, Wisconsin’s Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection sent the superstore a letter explaining the requirements of the state’s Unfair Sales Act.

The story is similar for Krist Oil, a family-owned gasoline company with more than 70 locations, mostly in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and Northern Wisconsin. Krist has the freedom to determine the most competitive price for its gasoline at its stations in Michigan, but it is legally barred from doing so in Wisconsin. Although it wants to lower prices, Krist is forced by the state to charge a markup of no less than 9.18%. The biggest losers are workers in rural Northern Wisconsin, who could benefit from lower gas prices.

Minimum Markup Laws

The Maclver Institute, a free market advocate for Wisconsin says Minimum Markup Makes Back-To-School Shoppers Pay More For Markers, Crayons And Other Supplies.

The minimum markup law, formally known as the Unfair Sales Act, bans retailers from selling merchandise below cost. The law, originally passed back in 1939, also requires a 9 percent price markup on specific items like alcohol, tobacco and gasoline.

Unfortunately, Wisconsinites are forced to pay for this archaic law that’s still on the books despite ongoing efforts to repeal it.

Families in Milwaukee buying basic items like composition books, markers, and crayons can expect to pay anywhere from 12 to 146 percent more than shoppers in St. Paul, Minn., Dubuque, Iowa, and Kalamazoo, Mich. Some common school items cost on average 90 percent more in Milwaukee. Crayola Crayons posted the single biggest price variance, costing almost 150 percent more in Milwaukee than in cities in neighboring states.

 

Unfair Sales Act

What a disastrous and consumer-unfriendly hoot. Does the Fed want Congress to make a national law requiring prices have to go up 2% a year? I suppose that would be one way for the Fed to hit its absurd 2% inflation target.

Meanwhile, the battle is on. Krist Oil, with the help of attorneys at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, has filed a lawsuit currently pending in state court that argues minimum markups arbitrarily and irrationally violate the economic liberty guaranteed by the Wisconsin Constitution. A victory here could be a blueprint for change in other states.

The problem with the approach is the outcome only applies to Wisconsin. Similar challenges would be needed in 25 more states.

From a practical standpoint, the best outcome might be if the state ruled against Krist, then Krist filed a challenge to a higher court which hopefully could make a national ruling, invalidating all such arcane laws in all states.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2nh6IEo Tyler Durden

Cryptos Bounce Back After Biggest Cybertheft In History

Following the biggest cybertheft in history – $534 million from Japan’s Coincheck – cryptocurrencies are soaring back higher after the exchange confirmed that it will issue full refunds to all of the 260,000 of its users who have become victims of the Friday NEM hack.

As a reminder, the Coincheck exchange  was hacked Friday, Jan. 26, resulting in a massive loss of 523 mln NEM coins, worth approximately $534 mln at that time. During a press release following the hack it has been revealed by the exchange’s representatives that the funds were stored on a single-signature hot wallet, constituting a relatively low-security environment.

But now, as CoinTelegraph reports, the company has now confirmed its intention to refund the stolen money to the affected users. According to the announcement, the refunds will be done using the exchange’s own capital.

The company is still considering the exact timing and methodology for the process. However, it has already announced that the compensation for each NEM coin will be JPY 88.549, which is the weighted average exchange rate during the period from when the trading was halted to the release of the latest announcement.

Coincheck indicated that they are referencing the XEM/JPY exchange rate at Zaif, another Japanese exchange which has the most trading volume for XEM globally.

Furthermore, Coincheck has again confirmed their intention to stay in business, as opposed to declaring bankruptcy, saying:

”Along with our ongoing efforts to file applications to be registered as a Cryptocurrency Exchange Service Provider with Financial Services Agency, we will continue business.”

NEM soared back to recent highs after the headlines hit…

 

The crypto community has shown support for Coincheck after this action and the development team behind NEM has announced that it is working on an automated system that will track the stolen coins and tag all addresses that receive the “tainted” money. This will allow any cryptocurrency exchange to blacklist the hackers’ accounts, preventing them from ever cashing out their illegally obtained fortune.

The positive sentiment in NEM and the Japanese markets has sparked a rally in the broader crypto markets with Ethereum leading the bounce…

]

 

Additionally, this rebound follows a week-long attack from the great-and-good elites in Davos. As CoinTelegraph reports, Full Tilt Capital Partner Anthony Pompliano was scathing in his analysis of the prevailing sentiment floating around in Davos towards Bitcoin.

The former Facebook product and growth manager suggested that statements made by economist Joseph Stiglitz that Bitcoin was still used for shady purposes actually has the opposite effect of driving people away from cryptocurrency adoption.

Max Keiser, host of the Keiser Report on RT, also touched on the wave of negativity around Bitcoin in Davos, but said it was too late for big financial industry players to try to stop what he described as a ‘revolution.’

Renowned American investor Bill Gross suggested that the rise of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency has signaled a move away from centralized institutions governing and controlling money. People seem to be putting their trust in technology over government-run establishments.

Twitter users CryptoWilson highlighted more negative sentiment towards cryptocurrency, sharing a video of French President Emmanuel Macron speaking in favor of regulatory crackdowns by the International Monetary Fund on cryptocurrency.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2EhNnu0 Tyler Durden

DOJ Withholding Over 85% Of Strzok-Page FBI Texts From Congressional Investigators

Out of 50,000 texts between anti-Trump FBI investigators Peter Strzok and Lisa Page – not including an unknown number of recently found texts, the DOJ has submitted a mere 7,000 to Congressional investigators – just 14%, reports the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York.


Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein

The majority of the withheld messages were deemed “pesonal” or withheld for other reasons, according to York. 

Also notable, according to York, is that the 50,000 Strzok-Page texts only include messages sent and received on FBI-issued Samsung phones – despite several text messages which make clear that the two agents also discussed their politically tainted investigations over their personal iPhones using iMessage. 

For investigators, those are particularly intriguing texts – what was so sensitive that they couldn’t discuss on their work phones? – but the number of those texts is unknown. And of course, they have not been turned over to Congress. –Washington Examiner

In a January 19 letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd to Congressional investigators, the DOJ said that they would not be providing “purely personal” text messages.

The department is not providing text messages that were purely personal in nature,” Boyd wrote. “Furthermore, the department has redacted from some work-related text messages portions that were purely personal. The department’s aim in withholding purely personal text messages and redacting personal portions of work-related text messages was primarily to facilitate the committee’s access to potentially relevant text messages without having to cull through large quantities of material unrelated to either the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server or the investigation into Russian efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.”

Lastly, York notes that Boyd says special counsel Robert Mueller made redactions to the texts “in a few instances,” which were “related to the structure, operation, and substance” of the Special Counsel’s investigation because it is ongoing. The DOJ told Congress that they would “work with” them to further describe or even reveal redacted information in a “closed setting.”


Special Counsel Robert Mueller III

As for the formerly missing text messages spanning December 14, 2016 through May 17, 2017, there are several unanswered questions. As The Examiner notes: 

The time period involved, Dec. 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017, covered some of the key moments in the FBI’s investigation of the Trump-Russia affair: conversations between Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak; the completion and publication of the intelligence community assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election; the briefing in which FBI director James Comey told President-elect Donald Trump about the Trump dossier; the president’s inauguration; the nomination and confirmation of new Justice Department leadership; Flynn’s interview with the FBI (conducted by Strzok); Comey’s assurances to Trump that he, Trump, was not under investigation; a variety of revelations, mostly in the Washington Post and New York Times, about various Trump figures under investigation; Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recusal from the Russia probe; the firing of top Obama Justice Department holdover Sally Yates; Trump’s tweet alleging he was wiretapped; Trump’s firing of Comey; and, finally, the appointment of Mueller.

Alas, it appears that the vast majority of text messages between the anti-Trump FBI investigators will remain in the dark for “personal” or “other reasons,” despite the fact that they may shed further light on the agents’ personalities, motivations, and the extent of their extreme political bias which clearly played a significant role in their investigations. 

via RSS http://ift.tt/2rPC5uy Tyler Durden

Trump Fires Back At Jay Z “Super Bug” Jab: “Somebody Tell Him Black Unemployment Is At Record Low”

The rapper who penned the classic track “Dead Presidents” is now feuding with one who is very much alive. 

President Trump lashed out at Brooklyn-born rapper Jay Z Sunday morning after he criticized Trump during an interview with CNN Saturday, saying reports that Trump referred to African nations as “shithole” countries were “hurtful” and “disappointing.”

In a tweet, Trump claimed that somebody should remind Jay-Z that black unemployment in the US has fallen to its lowest-recorded rate – something Trump attributed to his policies.

 

 

Jay Z angered Trump during an appearance on the Van Jones Show Saturday, where he compared Trump to former LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling and said the former New York real-estate mogul

“It is disappointing and it’s hurtful. It really is hurtful, more than so … everyone feels anger but after the anger, it’s real hurtful,” said Jay Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, during an interview with CNN’s Van Jones that aired Saturday.

The rapper said Trump’s reported comment – which the president has denied – was “how people talk … behind closed doors”.

He then compared the remark, allegedly made in a meeting with senators, to a recorded phone conversation involving the then LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling which cost him control of the NBA team in 2014.

Sterling’s public downfall, Jay-Z said, led “all of the other closet racists [to] just run back in the hole”.

“You haven’t fixed anything,” he said. “You have sprayed perfume on the trash can. What you do when you do, that is the bugs come. You spray something and you create a superbug because you don’t take care of the problem.”

“You don’t take the trash out, you keep spraying whatever over it to make it acceptable. As those things grow, you create a superbug. And then now we have Donald Trump, the superbug.”

Earlier, Van Jones joked that Trump could lay claim to the title of “first hip-hop president” because of his famous appreciation for “bling.” Trump famously made cameos on several hip hop records in the 1990s and 2000s.

Following the Trump tweet, Van Jones was quick to respond, as The Hill reports, “Someone needs to inform @realdonaldtrump that I ALREADY asked Jay Z whether black employment figures redeem Trump’s presidency,” Jones tweeted Sunday.

“And Jay’s answer last night on the #VanJonesShow was POWERFUL !!!”

 

Jay-Z said during the interview with Jones that it’s “not about money at the end of the day.”

“Money doesn’t equate to happiness,” he said. “You treat people like human beings– That’s the main point.”

Right Jay-Z, life’s about Money, Cash… & Hoes…

Of course, this isn’t the first time Trump has touted the black unemployment rate; he brought it up in a tweet earlier this month.

However, as we pointed out, this claim of record-low black unemployment is, like most headline economic data published by the BEA, somewhat misleading.

A better way to phrase it would be number of black people not in the labor force reaches an all-time high.”

laborrate

Just some food for thought…

via RSS http://ift.tt/2GrO18P Tyler Durden

Bonds Finally Noticed What Is Going On… Stocks Are Next

It is safe to say that one of the most popular, and important, charts of 2017, was the one showing the ongoing and projected decline across central bank assets, which from a record expansion of over $2 trillion in early 2017 is expected to turn negative by mid 2019. This is shown on both a 3- and 12-month rolling basis courtesy of these recent charts from Citi.

The reason the above charts are key, is because as Citi’s Matt King, DB’s Jim Reid, BofA’s Barnaby Martin and countless other Wall Street commentators have pointed out, historically asset performance has correlated strongly with the change in central bank balance sheets, especially on the way up.

As a result, the big question in 2017 (and 2018) is whether risk assets would exhibit the same correlation on the way down as well, i.e. drop.

We can now say that for credit the answer appears to be yes, because as the following chart shows, the ongoing decline in CB assets is starting to have an adverse impact on investment grade spreads which have been pushing wider in recent days, in large part due to the sharp moves in government bonds underline the credit spread.

And, what is more important, is that investors appear to have noticed the repricing across credit. This is visible in two places: on one hand while inflows into broader credit have remained generally strong, there has been a surprisingly sharp and persistent outflow from US high yield funds in recent weeks. These outflows from junk bond funds have occurred against a backdrop of rising UST yields, which recently hit 2.67%, the highest since 2014, another key risk factor to credit investors.

But while similar acute outflows have yet to be observed across the rest of the credit space, and especially among investment grade bonds, JPM points out that the continued outflows from HY and some early signs of waning interest in HG bonds in the ETF space in the US has also been accompanied by sharp increases in short interest ratios in LQD (Figure 13), the largest US investment grade bond ETF…

… as well as HYG, the largest US high yield ETF by total assets,

This, together with the chart showing the correlation of spreads to CB assets, suggests that positioning among institutional investors has turned markedly more bearish recently.

Putting the above together, it is becoming increasingly apparent that a big credit-quake is imminent, and Wall Street is already positioning to take advantage of it when it hits.

So what about stocks?

Well, as Citi noted two weeks ago, one of the reasons why there has been a dramatic surge in stocks in the new years is that while the impulse – i.e., rate of change – of central bank assets has been sharply declining on its way to going negative in ~18 months, the recent boost of purchases from EM FX reserve managers, i.e. mostly China, has been a huge tailwind to stocks.

sdf

This “intervention”, as well as the recent retail capitulation which has seen retail investors unleashed across stock markets, buying at a pace not seen since just before both the 1987 and 2008 crash, helps explain why stocks have – for now – de-correlated from central bank balance sheets.  This is shown in the final chart below, also from Citi.

 

And while the blue line and the black line above have decoupled, it is only a matter of time before stocks notice the same things that are spooking bonds, and credit in general, and get reacquainted with gravity.

What happens next? Well, if the Citi correlation extrapolation is accurate, and historically it has been, it would imply that by mid-2019, equities are facing a nearly 50% drop to keep up with central bank asset shrinkage. Which is why it is safe to say that this is one time when the bulls will be praying that correlation is as far from causation as statistically possible.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2DIrB5n Tyler Durden

My Plan Is to Let People Do Whatever They Please: New at Reason

A Saturnalia of Bunk Oh, that H.L. Mencken were alive today!

You don’t hear that wistful resurrectionary sentiment voiced much anymore. A modern newspaper columnist writing in Mencken’s gleeful style, with its joyful savagery, its jocose sesquipedalianism, its sheer delight in the American language, would be met with astonished horror on the order of Henry James watching a Sam Kinison video or Robby Mook meeting a man who owns a pickup truck. (I should warn you that one cannot write about Mencken without aping him, however clumsily.)

The longtime Baltimore Evening Sun columnist, American Mercury editor, and rumbustiously splenetic critic, who graced this orb from 1880 to 1956, would not be published in any major newspaper today. The reasons he foresaw over a century ago, when he decried the “cheap bullying and cheaper moralizing” whose purpose was the extirpation, the annihilation, of anything resembling a robust exchange of ideas. Two beliefs puffed up the righteous censor, according to Mencken: first, “that any man who dissents from the prevailing platitudes is a hireling of the devil,” and second, “that he should be silenced and destroyed forthwith. Down with free speech; up with the uplift!”

Plus ça change and all that, writes Bill Kauffman in his review of A Saturnalia of Bunk: Selections from the Free Lance, 1911–1915, a collection of H.L. Mencken writings.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2rO3Rr8
via IFTTT

Trump’s ‘America First’ Plan Is Naked Special-Interest Policymaking: New at Reason

Donald Trump, the self-proclaimed voice of American working people, has decreed that the prices of washing machines and solar panels shall rise. Trump’s decree, placing tariffs (taxes) on imported versions of those goods, will impose higher costs on consumers to help (in the short run) the minority of Americans who work in those industries. That’s how protectionism works—a favored group of firms and workers benefits at the expense of everyone else.

Trump calls this “America First,” writes Sheldon Richman. In fact, it’s naked special-interest policymaking. The American Firster Trump is coddling wimpy, whining firms that are better at lobbying than competing in the marketplace.

The mindset that leads Trump to save firms and industries that can’t compete is a call for stagnation and decline, argues Richman. Free people buying and selling in free markets should determine what is produced.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2GnWIRF
via IFTTT

Last Year The SNB Earned 32 Times More Than The 85 Swiss Private Banks

Submitted by Simon Jacques

This time ‘the Bank of the Swiss Banks’ will just not do fine. Not putting hedges on its foreign exchange exposure is an invitation for Crime. Rank-and-file incompetence in St. Gal-Land or a more sinister plot elaborated by the club have to not be ruled out.

The United States unlike other countries doesn’t set a currency target. The U.S Treasury says this is our currency; you deal with its problems. The problem for the Switzerland National Bank(SNB) is that when you change the complexion at the U.S federal reserve (“inflation not a big deal “aka The Mnuchin moment’ in Davos Switzerland) what you get is a much weaker dollar.

The U.S exports its inflation to European countries (one of its characteristic manifestation is through the increase in the European real interest rates) and while ECB is pulling back from quantitative easing, Europe is being left with zero reactivite capacity or real economic output capacity to absorb.

The next consequence for the SNB is a Swiss Franc surging against the dollar and euro. Yes, it appears that money will flow again into ‘St.Gallen-Land” and will make the SNB Foreign Assets look ‘worse’ probably more than they truly are but here is the predicament of Prof. Thomas Jordan : the SNB, also dubbed as the world’s largest hedge fund, to swing back at a loss.


Zero Hedge: EURCHF nears its pre-peg-break “carnage” levels.*

We are all conjecturing here, and not saying the ‘SNB must trade’- they must rather operate at the least frictional cost because why would the Swiss absolutely want to pay CHF25-100B in-kind foreign aid to the foreign countries and hedge funds?

Simply last year the SNB earned 32 times more than the 85 Swiss private banks (Pictet, Mirabaud, Lombard, UBP, J. Safra) for twice less assets.

Since 2015 The Swiss National Bank (SNB) have indeed been charging a 0.75% fee on large deposits at a core policy aimed at weakening the Swiss franc and boost the velocity of money.

The 0.75 percent negative interest on large deposit comprised only 3 to 4 percent of the earnings. What the SNB in fact did to weaken the Swiss franc was buying up foreign assets- They even own roughly $90 billion of US companies.

Under these circumstances and as a consequence of the franc’s 8.5 percent drop against the euro last year, the Bank of the Swiss Banks has printed a $55B profit for $836B of assets on its balance sheet for year 2017..

By comparison, the 85 Swiss Private Banks (The Pictet , REYL, Landolt & Cie, UBP etc..) put all together printed CHF1.7-1.8B for about CHF1,800B AUM. USD:CHF 0.93

With an enviable position of +$55 billion in the coffers, beating the Swiss Private banks 31-to-1, with an enormous position on foreign assets and amidst the extreme macro conditions in the Eurozone- How come the SNB does not hedge its currency risk against a Swiss franc appreciation on $836 of assets?

Indeed the glass tower, a long time ago determined that protecting against currency losses would have undesirable monetary policy consequences (and without any evidence proving the point)…

In the pre-electoral period it would be regrettable that the SNB ‘swings’ at a loss, indeed because of a large, but failed, experimentation made by two professors who do not comprehend their exposure, blinded by the glare of the monetary policy textbook and completely obnubilated by their money printer and its magic power.

I would view a lost at the Swiss National Bank (SNB) as an in-kind subsidy to the foreign countries and hedge funds.

via RSS http://ift.tt/2GqfFDe Tyler Durden