Goldman: “All Assets Except Stocks Are Signaling Less Risk Appetite”

It has been another violent, tumultuous, whipsawed, and illiquid, 72-hour trading period, with stocks plunging at the end of last week to their second correction of the year from the January highs, only to rebound furiously – and surprisingly – with the Dow posting its third largest one-day point move in history (if far smaller in percentage terms obviously).

The reversal was even more surprising when one considers the growing bearish positioning across all asset classes… well, all but stocks.

As Goldman equity strategist Ian Wright reports overnight, after last week’s pounding, Goldman’s risk appetite indicator (RAI) which at the end of January hit its highest level on record, was nearing neutral levels (Exhibit 1)…

… with the signal from most asset classes that appetite has retreated. However, although equities were the worst performing asset class last week, Goldman’s equity risk appetite signal had not actually fallen, as shown in the chart below:

This, Goldman explains, is because last week:

  • (1) EM again outperformed DM and
  • (2) small outperformed large caps (Exhibit 3), in part due to the  underperformance of tech, which was most likely from political, regulatory and potential tax concerns rather than from poor data about current profitability.

Furthermore, the small vs. large move was particularly sizeable relative to how range-bound it has been much of the past year. The equity signal has also been supported as cyclicals have not actually fallen much relative to defensives.

To be sure, yesterday’s events demonstrated very vividly that in this case, Goldman was right, as it took very little to launch a 669 points surge in the Dow (which has in turn prompted numerous skeptics).

And, perhaps surprisingly, Goldman is among them. As Wright concludes, during the last two low vol regimes (August 2012 to September 2014 and the recent low vol regime starting in June 2016), the bank’s RAI nearing zero has been a reversal signal.  However, now that the low vol regime has finally faltered, “it is less clear if this level will trigger a reversal again”, although Goldman writes that the bank continues to not expect a bear market…. even though its bear market indicator is at 71%, a level last seen just before the bursting of the dot com and housing/credit bubbles.

As a result, Goldman reminds that last week it recommended buying correction hedges such as 97/93 S&P 500 put
spreads. It is sticking with this reco. Which, the contrarians will quickly note, means that Monday’s surge is likely to continue, especially since Gartman’s stop-out level is some 40 points higher at 2,710.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2pKNvvc Tyler Durden

Higher Volatility Does Not Have To Equal Lower Stocks (And Vice Versa)

Authored by Kevin Muir via The Macro Trader blog,

Too many market participants believe rising stock market volatility can only occur in down markets. It might be true that rising volatility is considerably more likely to occur in times of market stress, but it’s nowhere near as certain as most pundits believe.

While there can be no denying that stock markets often take the escalator up and the elevator down, this generalization is far from a law of nature. Volatility is the measure of the variability of price returns. There is nothing written in the finance books saying that stocks cannot go up just as quickly as they go down.

Don’t believe me?

Well, let’s look at the period from 1990 to 1996.

During this time the stock market steadily rose, and as the textbooks would predict, historical volatility dripped lower and lower.

But what happened from 1996 to 2001? Well, stock markets went even higher, so volatility must have collapsed, right? Or at least stayed at depressed levels?

Nope.

During this time the S&P 500 more than doubled, but so did the realized volatility. 90-day historical volatility went from 8% to spiking above 25%, with the average firmly pushing 20%.

Please don’t misconstrue this as some sort of proclamation that VIX is heading higher. If you pay careful attention to my language you might note that I referenced realized historical volatility. VIX is not the same thing. One is the actual amount of variability in the prices of the underlying security, and the other is an index that is based on the implied volatility the market place is willing to pay for options that settle at some point in the future. As we saw during the recent VIX-pocalypse, the price of that index does not necessarily reflect underlying conditions and might have more to do with specific supply demand forces.

All I know is that there have been periods where both stocks and their realized volatility have both headed higher. Don’t assume that by shorting VIX or executing some other short volatility strategy that you are inherently betting on a higher stock market.

No doubt, that on average, that conclusion is correct, but how many times have we seen stable relationships completely thrown out the window? It would be just like the Market Gods to punish the vol sellers by having both volatility and stock prices shoot higher in the coming quarters. Those vol sellers would lose on both sides. The short volatility strategy will end up being a loser, while the synthetic short of not being long equities would also be a drain on the portfolio. Not a prediction, but it might be just the kind of out-of-the-blue outcome that hurts the most market players. And if there is one thing that I have learned over the years, it’s that markets often end up going to the point of maximum pain for the most amount of players. Higher volatility and higher stocks might end up being that sort of unexpected outcome.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IY5NSf Tyler Durden

Consumer Confidence Sinks As Stock Market Hope Plunges To Trump Election Lows

Having shrugged off stock market volatility in February, with present situation confidence buoyed by tax reform hope, Conference Board Consumer Confidence slipped in March (and missed expectations).

Febuary’s headline data was a 18 year high, so this remains an extreme level of confidence… Both current and future expectations also slid lower in March

 

“Consumer confidence declined moderately in March after reaching an 18-year high in February,” said Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board.

“Consumers’ assessment of current conditions declined slightly, with business conditions the primary reason for the moderation.

Consumers’ short-term expectations also declined, including their outlook for the stock market, but overall expectations remain quite favorable. Despite the modest retreat in confidence, index levels remain historically high and suggest further strong growth in the months ahead.

After reaching record highs in January, Americans’ confidence in continued stock market gains has crashed to its lowest since Trump’s election…

 

This is the biggest two-month collapse in stock market confidence in the survey’s 30-year history…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2upEvRG Tyler Durden

US Stocks Give Up Overnight Gains As Trade War Anxiety Reappears

The Dow and S&P have erased overnight gains (and Nasdaq is sliding fast) as traders sell the cash open following headlines from Wilbur Ross and China’s Global Times that suggest the trade war is far from over…

 

 

Treasury yields are tumbling…

And the dollar index is rapidly fading after spiking since Asia’s close.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2pOk1wC Tyler Durden

Tesla Bond Shorts Hit Record High, Stock Slumps Below $300

While Tesla shares have slipped but remain above Nov ’17 lows, Tesla’s bond yields have surged to a new record high (the same a Colombia) and bond short-sellers are adding as the price plunges.

99% of lendable supply for shorting Tesla’s high-yield bond has been used, sending the cost for new short positions in the bond to their highest ever, Sam Pierson, director, securities finance, at IHS Markit said in a Monday note.

Bets against that bond account for the bulk of the total short demand of $261 million for Tesla debt, according to IHS Markit.

Traders bet against a stock by borrowing and then selling shares in expectations they can buy them back cheaper later, or cover their shorts. It works the same for bonds basically.

However, as Pierson notes, as bond prices have plunged, yields surged, short-sellers have not covered at all…

“While equity short sellers continue to hang around, shorts in the most liquid TSLA bond have made a tidy profit so far in 2018…

They have not covered to lock in the profit, suggesting that they think the credit will continue to deteriorate.”

Signaling expectations of further pain to come from the cash-burning company…

All of which has pushed Tesla’s bond yield above those of Romania, Peru, Chile, and Philippines, and in line with Colombia…

 

As CNBC reports, short interest in Tesla shares has also increased to 17.9 percent, Pierson said. The total dollar amount of nearly $8.7 billion is second only to the $9.7 billion short balance in shares of Apple, the largest U.S. stock, according to exchange data as of the end of February cited by Pierson.

“Tesla shares may be nearing a cross-road,” Pierson said.

“With the short demand for Tesla increasing through the recent sell-off – and the short demand for bonds fully utilizing the available supply – it appears short sellers are looking for more downside before they begin to cover.”

And while the share price has entered a bear-market from their September highs, bond yields suggest significantly more pain to come…

Tesla share price fell back below $300 this morning…

Gonna need to sell a few more firethrowers

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GBrwB8 Tyler Durden

Stocks Stall As Ross Confirms US Curbs On Chinese Investments

After all the hard work of Mnuchin and Navarro ‘happy-talking’ stocks higher yesterday, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross may have begun the process of reality-checking as he confirms US will announce curbs on Chinese inevstements.

When asked about U.S. retaliation against China’s alleged violation of intellectual property, Ross told Fox News

“It’s not my practice to get ahead ahead of the president and what he announces. There will be limitations on foreign investment…

CFIUS, which is the entity that regulates foreign investment, has new legislation pending both in the House and in the Senate, so that will be part of it…

And then some other action by the president will be the other part of it. He’s going to be making some announcements about it.

And while the reaction is modest for now, the epic ramp from yesterday is starting to fade into the open…

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2pLvgpj Tyler Durden

Global Times: US To Unveil China Tariff List “In A Few Hours”; Beijing Will Respond

Last Friday, when the word was wondering why China “responded” with just $3 billion in US tariffs to the proposed 60 billion in “Section 301” duties to be levied by the Trump administration on China, it was Hu Xijin, the editor-in-chief of China’s state-owned nationalist tack-on of the People’s Daily, Global Times, who explained that the $3 billion in tariffs targeting 128, mostly agricultural products, was in response for the formerly revealed “Section 232” steel and aluminum tariffs which, while exempting much of the world, clearly had China in their crosshairs.

Fast forward to today, when the otherwise unassuming twitter account of the Global Times editor in chief was once again the focus on global macro traders, when shortly before 9am ET, he wrote that as far as he knows, “the US will release a list of products that it will impose higher tariffs based on 301 investigation in a few hours. China will put forward its retaliation list later, but the list will definitely come out. The US had better not think China will back off.

So is this return of last week’s angry tone out of China an indication that yesterday’s “trade war truce” rally was built on quicksand, and that once the US reveals the details of its second round in Chinese tariffs, Beijing will respond immediately. Or is this just the editor of China’s main US-facing propaganda outlet seeking to drum up page views and clicks?

For the answer, keep an eye on what the US commerce department does in the next few hours, and whether Hu is proven right on the immediate release, which would suggest that with an imminent Chinese response to this latest trade war shot, it is only a matter of time before market’s fade the entire Monday surge.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GvKt8l Tyler Durden

Facebook Shares Are Sliding Again

After yesterday’s miraculous resurgence in mega tech stocks, asset-gatherers and commission-takers were quick to reassure that the worst is over and all is well with Facebook. It’s not…

With whistleblower hearings under way in The UK, and Zuckerberg refusing to attend government hearings, it seems investors are losing religion once again FB is down over 1,5% in the pre-market, below Thursday’s close once again…

 

dead. cat. bounce. dead again

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GtR6rQ Tyler Durden

“The Home Price Surge Continues” – Case-Shiller Jumps Most In 4 Years, All Cities Up

US housing data has been disappointing so far in 2018 as affordability plummets on the heels of rising rates, but that didn’t stop Case-Shiller Home Prices from surging at a faster-than-expected 6.4% YoY in January.

Home sales, permits, and starts have been underwhelming so far this year…

 

But according to Case-Shiller, home prices are accelerating at their fastest rate since July 2014 (up 6.4% YoY vs 6.15% YoY exp)…

All 20 cities in the index showed year-over-year gains, led by a 12.9 percent increase in Seattle and an 11.1 percent gain in Las Vegas.

After seasonal adjustment, Seattle, San Francisco and Atlanta had the biggest month-over-month gains.

Washington has the smallest month-over-month advance at 0.2 percent.

“The home price surge continues,” David Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee, said in a statement.

“Two factors supporting price increases are the low inventory of homes for sale and the low vacancy rate among owner-occupied housing.”

The 20-City Home price index is less than 1% away from the record highs of 2006…

 

But the National home price index is over 6% above 2006 highs…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2pLhYcz Tyler Durden

A.M. Links: Trump’s Lawyer Troubles, Larry Nasser’s Michigan State Boss Arrested, Paul Ryan ‘Is Not Resigning’

  • New poll: President Donald Trump’s approval rating is at 42 percent.
  • “A prominent Chicago defense attorney said Monday that he had declined an invitation to lead President Trump’s legal team responding to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation, underscoring the president’s difficulty in attracting top legal talent to represent him in the probe.”
  • “The speaker is not resigning,” said AshLee Strong, spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, in response to rumors that Ryan would be stepping down.
  • William Strampel, who was Larry Nasser’s boss at the University of Michigan, has reportedly been arrested.
  • Linda Brown, one of the figures at the center of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, has died at age 75.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to sign up for Reason’s daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2GtLKNg
via IFTTT