Is the Free State Project a Better Idea than the Libertarian Party?


PorcFest_Angela_McArdle_6_25_2021_LowRes_v3

Founded in 1971, the Libertarian Party was created to elect libertarians to public office, including the presidency of the United States. 

Founded in 2001, the Free State Project is an effort to turn New Hampshire—the “Live Free or Die” state—into a libertarian paradise of minimal government, with the ultimate aim of electing a libertarian to the governorship.

Which is the more realistic path to creating a freer society? That was the question debated by Jeremy Kauffman, a member of the board of the Free State Project, and Angela McArdle, candidate for chair of the National Libertarian Party and current chair of the L.P. of Los Angeles County.

Kauffman defended the resolution, “The Free State Project is a more realistic path to liberty than the Libertarian Party,” and McArdle took the negative.

The debate was moderated by Soho Forum director Gene Epstein and held in front of a live audience at the Free State Project’s annual Porcupine Freedom Festival (Porcfest). It was an Oxford-style debate, so the audience voted on the proposition before and after the proceedings, with the winner being the person who moved more people to his or her side.

Narrated by Nick Gillespie.

Photo: Brett Raney

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3BXcwYg
via IFTTT

AOC Goes After Senator Krysten Sinema With A “No Climate, No Deal” Threat

AOC Goes After Senator Krysten Sinema With A “No Climate, No Deal” Threat

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Sinema is not yet on board the Biden Socialist Express. Words are flying…

AOC Blasts Sinema

On Wednesday, Senator Krysten Sinema (D., AZ) said she would not go along with the House Democrat’s proposed $3.5 trillion package. Here’s AOC’s response.

Representative Rashida Tlaib (D., MI), Chimes In

Nancy Pelosi Also In on the Act

The WSJ reports “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) has said she won’t bring the infrastructure bill up in the House until the broader $3.5 trillion package has passed the Senate, effectively yoking the two bills’ fates together.”

The Greens Hijack Biden’s $3.5 Trillion Budget Proposal

On July 15, I commented The Greens Hijack Biden’s $3.5 Trillion Budget Proposal (That Could be a Blessing)

The Greens inserted provisions for a “clean energy standard” that would mandate 80 percent clean electricity as soon as 2030. Biden’s goal was 2035. 

The proposal is a tariff (tax or a polluter import fee if you prefer). The idea is to put a tax on imports to make those countries adhere to the Progressive’s goal of 80% carbon-free energy by 2030 or 2035 at the latest.

Carbon Emission Percentages

 Progressive Economic Ignorance Has No Bounds

Imagine the costs if the Progressives get their way.

In addition to untenable clean energy costs, the bill would expand Medicare, offer universal “free” pre-kindergarten, two years of “free” college, and other massive giveaways.

Thus my comment: The Stagflation Threat is Very Real but Congress Holds the Key

Biden calls the bill “The American Jobs Plan”. I propose a slightly different name.

Stagflation Guarantee Act of 2021

If that boondoggle passes, it would practically guarantee deep and lengthy stagflation by increasing prices, reducing demand, and lowering growth.

If that’s what you want, call your Congressional representatives and tell them “I want higher prices, lower growth, and higher unemployment. Please vote for the Stagflation Guarantee Act of 2021.”

How likely is passage?

I don’t know. 

Senator Sinema clearly has strong reservations. We have not yet heard from Senator Joe Manchin (D., WV), a leading coal-producing state. 

It only takes one to derail the Socialist Express Train. But it would be better if there were at least two. 

It would be even better if Manchin or Sinema switched political parties. That would end all of this economic madness in one easy move.

*  *  *

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/30/2021 – 15:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3rL11P1 Tyler Durden

San Francisco Wants To Charge Drivers To Enter or Exit Downtown


cewitness084148

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) is considering implementing congestion pricing in the city’s downtown area to solve some of the city’s traffic issues. The main aims of the project are to “get traffic moving and achieve goals around street safety, clean air, and equity.”

Congestion pricing is a broad term for a system that charges people based on the use of a roadway. The specific type under consideration for San Francisco is “cordon pricing,” which charges people a flat rate every time they enter or exit a certain zone of the city.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the SFCTA is currently considering two possible zones for cordon pricing: a small one around the Financial District, Chinatown, Tenderloin, and South of Market neighborhoods, and a larger zone that would include North Beach, Russian Hill, Fisherman’s Wharf, and Mission Bay to the south.

Under the current proposal, authorities would only charge the congestion prices during rush hours in the morning and the evening. The plan would also include a full exemption for the lowest-income drivers, and possible exemptions for people with disabilities and those who live inside the zone.

Everyone making $100,000 a year or more would pay $6.50 to enter or exit the city center.

SFCTA claims that most of the people subject to the new fees would be higher-income drivers (making $100,000 a year or more) who commute into office buildings in the city.

Even so, not everyone is enthusiastic about the idea of making it more expensive for people to work or patronize businesses in the heart of downtown San Francisco, especially during a pandemic. It would amount to just one more fee on top of a load of taxes that California residents already pay to live and work in the state.

“CONGESTION PRICING IN SF?” said San Francisco political commentator Richie Greenberg on Twitter, “Nuts, ridiculous, anti-business, anti-tourist, anti-resident. What congestion? SF Financial District is still reeling from pandemic emptying out- it’s practically a ghost town STILL, and hitting people in the wallet ISN’T rational at all.”

Baruch Feigenbaum of Reason Foundation said “it’s complicated” whether congestion pricing in San Francisco would actually reduce traffic.

“There’s a concept in transportation called ‘induced demand,’ which means that if you take a vehicle off the roadway, another vehicle will use it because driving would be preferred over transit for most people,” he says. If there is already pent-up demand for driving in San Francisco, then even if some people stop driving because of the congestion prices, others will fill their place when they see that there is less traffic.

Congestion pricing is supported by some libertarians as an alternative, market-based solution to the transportation issues posed by traffic congestion. It’s a way to disincentivize driving that is relatively noninvasive and still allows individual drivers to make decisions themselves. And there is some evidence that it has worked quite well internationally.

“Congestion pricing of entire freeway networks has been successfully used to relieve congestion in several cities around the world,” writes Randal O’Toole in a Cato Institute policy paper. “In 2004 Santiago de Chile introduced variable tolling of major highways in the city, and this proved to greatly reduce travel times and improve highway safety. Norway instituted congestion pricing on major highways in Bergen, Oslo, and Trondheim, which has both helped finance those roads and relieved congestion. Several highways in France use congestion pricing of all lanes, which has significantly reduced traffic delay.”

“Economists do agree that highway congestion should be solved by pricing. Beyond that primary insight, however, there is much disagreement,” noted Canadian economics professor Robin Lindsey in an overview of 100 years of economic writing on the topic.

Feigenbaum stresses that the desirability of congestion pricing “depends on how they’re using the revenue.”

He points to New York City’s proposed cordon pricing system, where a majority of the funds will go to the very public transportation systems that the drivers are avoiding. Feigenbaum wrote on the plan, along with intern Joe Hillman, for Reason FoundationThey consider this a drawback because it means that a large part of the benefits paid for by congestion pricing in NYC will go to wealthier people near large public transit hubs and not the people who pay the congestion fees.

“Over the long-term,” they say, “the congestion pricing revenue is likely to benefit transit commuters, especially those who live near a subway station in the city or a train station on Long Island, Staten Island or in Connecticut.”

As of right now, the SFCTA study on how to implement the program is ongoing. The agency says that preparing a congesting pricing program would take at least five years. What happens between now and then could determine whether this is a good solution to traffic or another way for California to further inconvenience its citizens and waste their money. 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2WCV8YK
via IFTTT

San Francisco Wants To Charge Drivers To Enter or Exit Downtown


cewitness084148

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) is considering implementing congestion pricing in the city’s downtown area to solve some of the city’s traffic issues. The main aims of the project are to “get traffic moving and achieve goals around street safety, clean air, and equity.”

Congestion pricing is a broad term for a system that charges people based on the use of a roadway. The specific type under consideration for San Francisco is “cordon pricing,” which charges people a flat rate every time they enter or exit a certain zone of the city.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the SFCTA is currently considering two possible zones for cordon pricing: a small one around the Financial District, Chinatown, Tenderloin, and South of Market neighborhoods, and a larger zone that would include North Beach, Russian Hill, Fisherman’s Wharf, and Mission Bay to the south.

Under the current proposal, authorities would only charge the congestion prices during rush hours in the morning and the evening. The plan would also include a full exemption for the lowest-income drivers, and possible exemptions for people with disabilities and those who live inside the zone.

Everyone making $100,000 a year or more would pay $6.50 to enter or exit the city center.

SFCTA claims that most of the people subject to the new fees would be higher-income drivers (making $100,000 a year or more) who commute into office buildings in the city.

Even so, not everyone is enthusiastic about the idea of making it more expensive for people to work or patronize businesses in the heart of downtown San Francisco, especially during a pandemic. It would amount to just one more fee on top of a load of taxes that California residents already pay to live and work in the state.

“CONGESTION PRICING IN SF?” said San Francisco political commentator Richie Greenberg on Twitter, “Nuts, ridiculous, anti-business, anti-tourist, anti-resident. What congestion? SF Financial District is still reeling from pandemic emptying out- it’s practically a ghost town STILL, and hitting people in the wallet ISN’T rational at all.”

Baruch Feigenbaum of Reason Foundation said “it’s complicated” whether congestion pricing in San Francisco would actually reduce traffic.

“There’s a concept in transportation called ‘induced demand,’ which means that if you take a vehicle off the roadway, another vehicle will use it because driving would be preferred over transit for most people,” he says. If there is already pent-up demand for driving in San Francisco, then even if some people stop driving because of the congestion prices, others will fill their place when they see that there is less traffic.

Congestion pricing is supported by some libertarians as an alternative, market-based solution to the transportation issues posed by traffic congestion. It’s a way to disincentivize driving that is relatively noninvasive and still allows individual drivers to make decisions themselves. And there is some evidence that it has worked quite well internationally.

“Congestion pricing of entire freeway networks has been successfully used to relieve congestion in several cities around the world,” writes Randal O’Toole in a Cato Institute policy paper. “In 2004 Santiago de Chile introduced variable tolling of major highways in the city, and this proved to greatly reduce travel times and improve highway safety. Norway instituted congestion pricing on major highways in Bergen, Oslo, and Trondheim, which has both helped finance those roads and relieved congestion. Several highways in France use congestion pricing of all lanes, which has significantly reduced traffic delay.”

“Economists do agree that highway congestion should be solved by pricing. Beyond that primary insight, however, there is much disagreement,” noted Canadian economics professor Robin Lindsey in an overview of 100 years of economic writing on the topic.

Feigenbaum stresses that the desirability of congestion pricing “depends on how they’re using the revenue.”

He points to New York City’s proposed cordon pricing system, where a majority of the funds will go to the very public transportation systems that the drivers are avoiding. Feigenbaum wrote on the plan, along with intern Joe Hillman, for Reason FoundationThey consider this a drawback because it means that a large part of the benefits paid for by congestion pricing in NYC will go to wealthier people near large public transit hubs and not the people who pay the congestion fees.

“Over the long-term,” they say, “the congestion pricing revenue is likely to benefit transit commuters, especially those who live near a subway station in the city or a train station on Long Island, Staten Island or in Connecticut.”

As of right now, the SFCTA study on how to implement the program is ongoing. The agency says that preparing a congesting pricing program would take at least five years. What happens between now and then could determine whether this is a good solution to traffic or another way for California to further inconvenience its citizens and waste their money. 

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2WCV8YK
via IFTTT

Hong Kong Police Arrest Man For Booing During Chinese National Anthem

Hong Kong Police Arrest Man For Booing During Chinese National Anthem

Hong Kong police added another prisoner to the growing list of people being arrested under the new Beijing-imposed national security law. On the same day that the first protester to be sentenced received a 9 year prison sentence, another man was arrested in Hong Kong for allegedly booing during the Chinese national anthem during a live screening of an Olympic event.

A group of people were reportedly watching Chinese Olympic fencer Edgar Cheung Ka-long receive his gold medal when the individual, identified as a reporter for the activist news organization Freeman Express, started booing the anthem. He was later arrested in Kwai Chung at about 1300 local time on Friday. He was still being held for questioning and hadn’t yet been officially charged by the end of the day, according to the South China Morning Post.

Police used surveillance footage from the security camera at Kwun Tong’s APM shopping center (the site of the alleged booing) to identify the culprit.

Insulting the Chinese national anthem “the March of the Volunteers” is illegal under the national security law passed last year by Beijing, which explicitly outlaws “any misuse” of the song.

Apparently, the suspect isn’t the only one who has been booing at the anthem. According to police, they have been investigating “an outbreak of boos and jeers” during the playing of the national anthem. HK police have even infiltrated crowds of people watching Olympic events to try and catch anybody who audibly protests to China’s supremacy.

Now, just imagine what the police would do if somebody dared to take a knee.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/30/2021 – 14:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3zTS2Os Tyler Durden

Enjoy the Quirky Moodiness of Amazon’s Costume Drama The Pursuit of Love


pursuitoflove_1161x653

The Pursuit of LoveAvailable now on Amazon Prime Video.

If you thought the Bundys or the Bunkers or the Sopranos were dysfunctional families, you should have seen the Mitfords, who didn’t even have the advantage of screenwriters to help craft their venom.

Six daughters of the minor British aristocracy, the Mitfords were the early 20th century’s more highbrow version of the Kardashians, a collection of authors, adulterers, totalitarians, spies, pansexuals, anti-Semites and suicidal loons who could have filled up an entire cable news network if one had existed back in their day. The lone son in the mix did his bit for familial derangement as well. Tom Mitford carried on a long, adulterous affair with a well-known Jewish dancer while admiring fascism so ardently that he refused to fight in Europe during World War II.

The family dynamics were about what you would expect, only more so. “The great advantage of living in a large family,” observed Nancy, the clan’s senior writer, “is that early lesson of life’s essential unfairness.”

She might have added that it also provides an endless stream of source material for writing projects. Nancy’s trilogy of novels about the Radletts, a manically heir-headed tribe of British swells, drew generously from the misadventures of the Mitfords. And now the BBC has adapted the first volume, The Pursuit of Love, into a tony,  if also slightly madcap, soap opera that aired in Europe a couple of months ago and this week gets its American television debut on the Amazon Prime Video streaming service.

Pursuit is about a lot of different things—the sheer bat guano-ness of the Mitfords, the mindless faddism of the British ruling class, the intellectual and moral shallowness of the fanatic followers of the century’s most frightful utopian ideologies, the communists and the Nazis—but it’s mostly a chronicle of female friendship in an age of unregenerate male supremacy. It follows the sometimes embattled, but always profound, friendship between the gorgeous but flaky Linda Radlett (Lily James, Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again) and her more staid cousin Fanny Logan (Emily Beecham, Into the Badlands), who narrates their story.

Together, for a quarter of a century, they endure the lunatic whims of batty parents, stultifying husbands and unhinged family members. (At one point, they even journey to America to retrieve an AWOL Radlett sister who’s run away to Hollywood in hopes of marrying an actor she saw in a pirate movie.) They dodge their way through the political bombshells of the run-up to World War II and the not-at-all metaphorical ones that follow. They boldly insist they’ll be nothing like their parents, then cringe at evidence of the opposite.

It is the parents who prove the most formidable obstacles to domestic tranquility. Fanny’s mother (played with scatterbrained energy by Pursuit’s writer-director, Emily Mortimer) has fled so many husbands that she’s known even to family members as The Bolter. That has left Fanny’s upbringing mostly in the hands of her uncle (and Linda’s father) Matthew, a man of firm opinions: “I hate Huns, Frogs, Americans and Catholics and all other foreigners. But above all I hate children.” Any suspicion that he’s joking is dispelled during the family’s annual Christmas Day celebrations, when the kids race through the forest pursued by Matthew’s roaring hunting hounds.

The enforced solitude of Matthew’s estate leaves the girls intellectually and socially crippled, especially Linda, whose dreams of rescue have led to her to falling hopelessly in love with the idea of falling hopelessly in love. Her random romances—first with a fascist banker (“I hate the working class—ravening beasts trying to get my money!”), then with a Communist Party organizer (“They just make speeches all the time,” Linda broods after the sexual bloom is off the rose), quickly implode. A daughter bores her, even more than Fanny bored the Bolter.

Fanny’s fancies are more modest; as a teenager, when Linda is fantasizing that a prince’s car will break down in front of the house, Fanny daydreams of a portly farmer she saw walking down the road. Yet she, too, winds up dissatisfied, complaining that the quiet life she fantasized about with an Oxford don has turned downright somnolent. Pursuit tries to frame this in feminist terms—”Happily married or unhappily married, that’s the choice if you’re a woman,” one of the girls complains, wondering why a husband must be part of every equation. Yet often, the women’s unhappiness seems mostly of their own making. As adolescents, they lay about the manor, waiting for their lives to begin; as adults, they mostly long for a return to the easy decisions and trifling consequences of adolescence.

If Pursuit sounds like one of those mannered costume dramas that the BBC turns out like soggy fish and chips, well, at least partly, it is. But Mortimer saves it with sly humor, imaginative camerawork and a cleverly anachronistic rock-and-roll soundtrack—sort of like Sofia Coppola did with her 2006 royal soap Marie Antoinette, but much better. She’s helped greatly by James’ hilariously oblivious performance as the often clueless Linda (shocked, for instance, that marriage to a communist cell-organizer does not include maid service).

And the larger-than-life performance of Dominic West (The Wire) as the blustering Matthew is a thing of consummate beauty, or ugliness, or something. How can you not love a character who hangs over the family dinner table the entrenching tool with which he beat eight Germans to death as they emerged from a trench during World War I?

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/37baoOw
via IFTTT

If Coal Is Dead, Then Why Are Ships So Full Of It?

If Coal Is Dead, Then Why Are Ships So Full Of It?

By Greg Miller of FreightWaves,

Amid all the talk of global warming, climate change-induced catastrophes, decarbonization and green finance, the global trade in “dirty” coal is enjoying an ironic renaissance. Bulk ships are busy transporting coal to Asia — and to eco-conscious Europe — boosting freight income for some of the very shipowners who publicly tout their environmental bona fides to investors.

“Turns out the news of the demise of coal has been greatly exaggerated,” said Stifel analyst Ben Nolan in a new client note. “Despite an unseemly carbon footprint, coal demand is actually accelerating this year.”

Freight rates buoyed by coal

Coal is transported aboard larger bulkers known as Capesizes (ships with a capacity of around 180,000 deadweight tons or DWT), as well as on sub-Cape vessels such as Panamaxes (65,000-90,000 DWT) and Supramaxes (45,000-60,000 DWT).

According to Clarksons Platou Securities, Capesize spot rates averaged $32,800 per day on Monday, with Panamaxes at $31,800 and Supramaxes at $31,600. It’s rare in dry bulk shipping for all three segments to simultaneously top $30,000, as they have for the past five weeks.

“Strong activity in the coal markets as well as robust minor bulk volumes remain the driving force of elevated rates across the different asset classes,” said Clarksons.

The Financial Times recently pointed out that coal commodity pricing is outpacing both real estate and financial stock returns this year. The price of high-grade Australian thermal coal (used for power generation) had risen to $151 per ton as of Friday, more than triple its price last September, according to Argus. The price of semi-soft Australian coking coal (or metallurgical coal, used for steel production) was $127 per ton, up almost 80% year to date.

“Year-to-date thermal coal exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast, where exports tend to be very price- and demand-sensitive, are up 194%,” said Nolan.

Thermal coal demand drivers

Some of the extreme weather events being attributed to global warming are now increasing demand for seaborne shipments of high-carbon-emitting coal.

Exceptionally hot weather has hiked electricity usage, which is simultaneously being pushed up by growing economic activity. Higher electricity usage increases demand for thermal coal imports. “This year, a hot summer in Asia has led several of the big consumers, which had been shifting away [from coal], to not shift at all,” said Nolan.

A drought in May in southern China cut that region’s access to hydropower, an alternative to coal. More recently, the problem has been too much water in northern China. This month’s tragic floods in Zhengzhou are curtailing coal moves from inland sources. China’s state planner reported that coal transport from Inner Mongolia and Shanxi through Zhengzhou to eastern and central China has been “severely impacted.”

Hot weather is simultaneously boosting prices and lowering reserves of natural gas, which competes with thermal coal for power generation. “Even in Europe, which is the epicenter for decarbonization, low natural gas inventories are driving a sharp increase in thermal coal imports from virtually every nation,” said Nolan.

Restocking for winter

Summer demand will be complemented by restocking for winter demand and inventory rebuilding in general, as well as by demand for coking coal for steel production.

Maritime Strategies International (MSI) noted in its monthly outlook, “China’s National Development and Reform Commission has announced plans to build stocks of over 100 million tons of ‘deployable coal reserves,’ but domestic coal stockpiles are at their lowest levels since February.”

It’s not just China. According to Braemar ACM Shipbroking, “In preparation for the winter season, South Korea, among other nations, has increased coal purchases to avoid energy supply deficits.” South Korea’s July coal imports are on track to hit a five-year high.

Nolan added, “With coal prices currently in regions not seen in a decade or more, there is ample motivation to increase production anywhere and everywhere. Clearly, this is good news for dry bulk shipping moving into winter as coal is often stockpiled in advance and the motivation for such inventory building should be great given the risk of [natural] gas shortages.

“This should lead to some very interesting months starting in September, given how tight the dry bulk shipping market already is currently.”

Decarbonization and Chinese imports

One irony of the current market is that weather events ascribed to global warming are stoking demand for transport of out-of-favor coal. A second irony is that the decarbonization push in China could increase coal-shipping demand even more. 

During last month’s Marine Money Week virtual conference, Magnus Halvorsen, CEO of Norway-listed 2020 Bulkers, explained, “China consumes around 4 billion tons of coal [a year] and imports shy of 300 [million tons], so any change in the import ratio to consumption will have a dramatic impact on import requirements. If China, as part of an environmental crackdown on its domestic production, produces significantly less coal, it’s going to have a strong impact on import requirements.”

According to Aristides Pittas, CEO of EuroDry (NASDAQ: EDRY), “China, for environmental reasons, is going to limit the use of its own coal mines. So, the better-quality coal [from outside China] will benefit, and that will benefit the shipping market.

“We all know coal is a dirty cargo and one that will become obsolete at some point in time,” said Pittas during the Marine Money Week event. “We are all in favor of that. We want a clean world and we want to help. But it doesn’t happen overnight. It doesn’t happen that quickly. And the road to decarbonization will create a lot of inefficiencies. Inefficiencies are usually things that help shipping markets.

“I think coal will surprise people,” said Pittas. “It’s not disappearing yet, so watch out.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/30/2021 – 14:28

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2Ws9JGb Tyler Durden

Enjoy the Quirky Moodiness of Amazon’s Costume Drama The Pursuit of Love


pursuitoflove_1161x653

The Pursuit of LoveAvailable now on Amazon Prime Video.

If you thought the Bundys or the Bunkers or the Sopranos were dysfunctional families, you should have seen the Mitfords, who didn’t even have the advantage of screenwriters to help craft their venom.

Six daughters of the minor British aristocracy, the Mitfords were the early 20th century’s more highbrow version of the Kardashians, a collection of authors, adulterers, totalitarians, spies, pansexuals, anti-Semites and suicidal loons who could have filled up an entire cable news network if one had existed back in their day. The lone son in the mix did his bit for familial derangement as well. Tom Mitford carried on a long, adulterous affair with a well-known Jewish dancer while admiring fascism so ardently that he refused to fight in Europe during World War II.

The family dynamics were about what you would expect, only more so. “The great advantage of living in a large family,” observed Nancy, the clan’s senior writer, “is that early lesson of life’s essential unfairness.”

She might have added that it also provides an endless stream of source material for writing projects. Nancy’s trilogy of novels about the Radletts, a manically heir-headed tribe of British swells, drew generously from the misadventures of the Mitfords. And now the BBC has adapted the first volume, The Pursuit of Love, into a tony,  if also slightly madcap, soap opera that aired in Europe a couple of months ago and this week gets its American television debut on the Amazon Prime Video streaming service.

Pursuit is about a lot of different things—the sheer bat guano-ness of the Mitfords, the mindless faddism of the British ruling class, the intellectual and moral shallowness of the fanatic followers of the century’s most frightful utopian ideologies, the communists and the Nazis—but it’s mostly a chronicle of female friendship in an age of unregenerate male supremacy. It follows the sometimes embattled, but always profound, friendship between the gorgeous but flaky Linda Radlett (Lily James, Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again) and her more staid cousin Fanny Logan (Emily Beecham, Into the Badlands), who narrates their story.

Together, for a quarter of a century, they endure the lunatic whims of batty parents, stultifying husbands and unhinged family members. (At one point, they even journey to America to retrieve an AWOL Radlett sister who’s run away to Hollywood in hopes of marrying an actor she saw in a pirate movie.) They dodge their way through the political bombshells of the run-up to World War II and the not-at-all metaphorical ones that follow. They boldly insist they’ll be nothing like their parents, then cringe at evidence of the opposite.

It is the parents who prove the most formidable obstacles to domestic tranquility. Fanny’s mother (played with scatterbrained energy by Pursuit’s writer-director, Emily Mortimer) has fled so many husbands that she’s known even to family members as The Bolter. That has left Fanny’s upbringing mostly in the hands of her uncle (and Linda’s father) Matthew, a man of firm opinions: “I hate Huns, Frogs, Americans and Catholics and all other foreigners. But above all I hate children.” Any suspicion that he’s joking is dispelled during the family’s annual Christmas Day celebrations, when the kids race through the forest pursued by Matthew’s roaring hunting hounds.

The enforced solitude of Matthew’s estate leaves the girls intellectually and socially crippled, especially Linda, whose dreams of rescue have led to her to falling hopelessly in love with the idea of falling hopelessly in love. Her random romances—first with a fascist banker (“I hate the working class—ravening beasts trying to get my money!”), then with a Communist Party organizer (“They just make speeches all the time,” Linda broods after the sexual bloom is off the rose), quickly implode. A daughter bores her, even more than Fanny bored the Bolter.

Fanny’s fancies are more modest; as a teenager, when Linda is fantasizing that a prince’s car will break down in front of the house, Fanny daydreams of a portly farmer she saw walking down the road. Yet she, too, winds up dissatisfied, complaining that the quiet life she fantasized about with an Oxford don has turned downright somnolent. Pursuit tries to frame this in feminist terms—”Happily married or unhappily married, that’s the choice if you’re a woman,” one of the girls complains, wondering why a husband must be part of every equation. Yet often, the women’s unhappiness seems mostly of their own making. As adolescents, they lay about the manor, waiting for their lives to begin; as adults, they mostly long for a return to the easy decisions and trifling consequences of adolescence.

If Pursuit sounds like one of those mannered costume dramas that the BBC turns out like soggy fish and chips, well, at least partly, it is. But Mortimer saves it with sly humor, imaginative camerawork and a cleverly anachronistic rock-and-roll soundtrack—sort of like Sofia Coppola did with her 2006 royal soap Marie Antoinette, but much better. She’s helped greatly by James’ hilariously oblivious performance as the often clueless Linda (shocked, for instance, that marriage to a communist cell-organizer does not include maid service).

And the larger-than-life performance of Dominic West (The Wire) as the blustering Matthew is a thing of consummate beauty, or ugliness, or something. How can you not love a character who hangs over the family dinner table the entrenching tool with which he beat eight Germans to death as they emerged from a trench during World War I?

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/37baoOw
via IFTTT

China’s Taishan Nuclear Reactor Shut Down For “Maintenance” Amid Fears Of Radiation Leak Cover-Up

China’s Taishan Nuclear Reactor Shut Down For “Maintenance” Amid Fears Of Radiation Leak Cover-Up

Weeks ago the Chinese government sought to downplay – but also admitted – an incident at Taishan nuclear plant near Hong Kong which involved damage to fuel rods, also amid wider suspicions of a radiation leak, mainly being spotlighted by entities based outside the country – most notably the French company that part owns and assists in operating the site which warned of an “imminent radiological threat”.

Now adding to these suspicions of a much more serious incident than what China admitted, Taishan’s operator has announced Friday that one of Taishan’s reactors has been shut down for “maintenance”. The Chinese government had dismissed what it called a “common” problem, citing no need for concern, while the China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) on Friday issued a statement saying the reactor is “completely under control”

Taishan Nuclear Power Plant. Source: EDF

This after as CNN reported in mid-June the French operator took the very unusual step of reaching out to the US government for help:

While US officials have deemed the situation does not currently pose a severe safety threat to workers at the plant or Chinese public, it is unusual that a foreign company would unilaterally reach out to the American government for help when its Chinese state-owned partner is yet to acknowledge a problem exists. The scenario could put the US in a complicated situation should the leak continue or become more severe without being fixed.

Obviously this all suggested a potential serious cover-up in progress which further appeared to pit the French operator against Chinese authorities overseeing the plant. BBC in its latest reporting Friday referenced this internal conflict now leading to the Unit 1 shutdown at Taishan. 

Referencing the French firm, BBC writes:

EDF later said a problem with fuel rods had led to the build-up of gases, which had to be released into the atmosphere. Fuel rods are sealed metal tubes which hold nuclear materials used to fuel the nuclear reactor.

Last week an EDF spokesperson told CNN the French company would shut the plant down if it could. They said the decision lay with the Chinese operator. The situation at Taishan was “not an emergency” but nevertheless a “serious situation”, the spokesperson added.

But now this statement: “After lengthy conversations between French and Chinese technical personnel, Taishan Nuclear Power Plant… decided to shut down Unit 1 for maintenance,” China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) said.

The type of reactor the Tiashan facility has, the EPR, is somewhat experimental as it’s the first operational one in the world as has been dubbed the “future” of nuclear energy reactors as it’s supposed to be safer and more powerful. However, as one 2020 headline in Popular Mechanics emphasized, “France’s revolutionary nuclear reactor is a leaky, expensive mess.”

All of this potentially points to a more severe problem at the site than what’s being publicly acknowledged. Referencing the initial EDF letter sent to the US Department of Energy in June, one regional report says the Chinese may be covering up a growing radiation leak

EDF had previously spelled out that if the reactor were located in France, it would without doubt shut it down – but that this was the decision of the Chinese government.

“In the letter, the French power company reportedly accused the Chinese safety authority of raising the acceptable level of radiation outside the power plant, a report denied by the Chinese government. While the ministry of ecology and environment admitted the power plant had five broken fuel rods, it said no radioactivity leaked,” according to Hindustan Times.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/30/2021 – 14:07

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3ldclCd Tyler Durden

US Capitol Police Walks Back A Memo On Arresting People For Not Wearing A Mask

US Capitol Police Walks Back A Memo On Arresting People For Not Wearing A Mask

Authored by Masooma Haq via The Epoch Times,

The United States Capitol Police (USCP) reversed a decision to arrest people who do not comply with Tuesday’s reinstatement of the mask mandate, saying instead that the consequence for violators will be removal from the buildings.

“Regarding the House mask rule, there is no reason it should ever come to someone being arrested. Anyone who does not follow the rule will be asked to wear a mask or leave the premises. The Department’s requirements for officers to wear masks is for their health and safety,” stated a USCP press statement put out Thursday.

Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) said she has received a memo in which Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told police to arrest visitors who did not comply with mask mandate and report members of congress.

“In today’s edition of Pelosi’s abuse of power, Capitol Police have been directed to arrest staff and visitors to comply with her mask mandate for vaccinated individuals. For Members, they advise not arresting but ‘reporting Members to SAA for their failure to comply,’” wrote Cammack in a social media statement Thursday morning.

Dr. Marc Siegel told Fox News in a Thursday interview that the mask mandate was reinstated because of the spread of the Delta Variant in the United States.

Changes because of the Delta variant as you already said, and I think it’s going to confuse people because the mask is just an added feature. It’s not meant to undermine that the vaccine is way more important. But the reason is because of those people who got sick, who were already vaccinated, they found a lot of virus, the same amount of virus as if you were unvaccinated,” said Siegel who is a physician, Professor of Medicine at the NYU Langone Medical Center, author, and contributor to Fox News.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the mask mandate is based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance and recommendations made by the Capitol Attending Physician Brian Monahan.

Besides Republican members of Congress opposing the mask mandate, a growing number of health officials and scientists are calling on the CDC to release data behind its decision to recommend that the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus—which causes the disease COVID-19—vaccinated people wear masks in high-transmission areas.

One of them, New York City Health and Hospitals President and CEO Mitchell Katz, said he’s reluctant to follow the agency’s guidelines on universal masking.

“While the CDC issued their guidance yesterday at about 3 p.m., they have not yet released their scientific reports on the data that underlies their recommendation,” Katz said at a news conference.

 “I think we owe it to New Yorkers to very carefully, as you say, review that information and understand its implications,” Katz added.

“Our focus has to be on getting people vaccinated.”

A spokesperson for the CDC told The Epoch Times on Thursday that the “first publication” of the data it used for the guidance will be published tomorrow.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/30/2021 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3if4Toe Tyler Durden