US Q1 GDP Revisions Scream Stagflation

US Q1 GDP Revisions Scream Stagflation

The third look at Q1 GDP appears to confirm the worsening picture of the US economy that is now evident in sentiment surveys nationwide.

Growth was revised even lower to -1.6% Annualized QoQ (from -1.5%)…

Personal Consumption growth collapsed from +3.1% to just +1.8% – weakest since the COVID lockdown collapse…

And finally, inflation – GDP Price Index – rose from +8.1% to +8.2% – the highest since June 1981

So – stagflation it is… not exactly what The Fed wants to see.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 08:38

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Kx4ITmL Tyler Durden

Tesla Lays Off 200 Autopilot Workers, Shutters Its San Mateo Office

Tesla Lays Off 200 Autopilot Workers, Shutters Its San Mateo Office

It looks as though not quite everything may be copacetic in the world of Tesla’s Autopilot feature. 

That’s because yesterday, in the midst of a now weeks-long period of silence for Elon Musk on Twitter, it was reported that Tesla was laying off about 200 jobs related to Autopilot and closing its San Mateo office, where Autopilot was the focus. 

Two employees told CNBC that they knew the company’s lease was heading toward its end on the office. 

The CNBC report said that the jobs were likely “data annotation” jobs, which “involves identifying and describing objects in short clips that were captured by cameras and sensors on Tesla vehicles”, in addition to labeling data.

Data labelers are also responsible for logging overlapping objects and their effectiveness as employees is rated on how many clips they can annotate over short periods of time. 

An employee told CNBC they expected to be moved to Palo Alto, but not to lose their job. In a audio recording of a Tesla meeting, a manager tells employees “You knew our lease was ending here in San Mateo,” before telling them the company has put a “restructure in place” and that their “positions were impacted”. 

Employees were told that June 28 would be their last day. 

Meanwhile, the loss of employees in the Autopilot division comes just days after we reported that Teslas on Autopilot were found to crash more than competitors. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been gathering the data for about a year. It said two weeks ago that it had documented more than 200 crashes involving Teslas on some form of automated driving system.

The data will “single out” Tesla for a “disproportionately high number” of crashes, AP wrote last week.  

The data showed that Tesla’s crash rate per 1,000 vehicles was “substantially higher” than other automakers. The data was being collected as part of a NHTSA investigation looking into Tesla vehicles’ mysterious penchants for crashing into stopped vehicles and emergency vehicles on roadways – a disturbing trend we have been documenting for the better part of the last several years. 

Remember, we wrote back in February that the NHTSA was looking at over 416,000 Teslas over “phantom braking”. 

The agency had opened a formal investigation into 416,000 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles over reports of unexpected brake activation at high speeds when driver-assistance system Autopilot is engaged. 

NHTSA said the investigation was being opened after it received 354 complaints about “rapid deceleration can occur without warning, at random, and often repeatedly in a single drive cycle.” No crashes or injuries have stemmed from the braking issue. 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 08:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/1yjLNcd Tyler Durden

Judicial-Judicial Small Change Tolerance Slippery Slopes and the Extension of Precedent


slippery

[This month, I’m serializing my 2003 Harvard Law Review article, The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope.]

Just as precedents can be extended beyond their original terms through equality slippery slopes and attitude-altering slippery slopes, they can also be extended through small change tolerance slippery slopes.

Legal rules are often unavoidably vague at the margins. Even when a rule usually yields a clear result, there will often be some uncertainty on the border between the covered and the uncovered. If, for instance, a new free speech exception allows the punishment of “racial, sexual, and religious epithets,” some speech (for example, “nigger” or “kike”) would pretty clearly be covered. Other speech (for example, “blacks are inferior” or “Jews are conspiring to rule the world”) would clearly not be covered. For other speech (for example, “Jesus freak” or “Bible-thumper” or “son-of-a-bitch”), the result might be uncertain. {Some readers might conclude that some words in this last example are clearly epithets and other words are clearly not, but I suspect others would disagree. My point here is a descriptive one—that the result would indeed be uncertain—and not that the result should be uncertain.}

In such situations, the judge deciding each case has considerable flexibility. The test’s terms and the existing precedents leave a zone of possible decisions that will seem reasonable to most observers. If the judge draws the line at any place in that zone, most observers won’t much complain. This is a small change deference heuristic: if the distance between this case and the precedents is small enough, defer to the judge.

There can be various causes for this deference. Judges on a multi-member panel may defer to an authoring judge’s draft opinion because they know that they can’t debate every detail of the many cases that need to be decided; this isn’t rational ignorance as such, but more broadly rational management of the court’s time. Judges may also be reluctant to alienate sometimes prickly colleagues, with whom they must regularly work, by fighting seemingly minor battles. Thus, while each judge may in theory review the authoring judge’s draft de novo, in practice there’s some deference. And this effect will be even greater when judges are deciding whether to rehear a case en banc, where deference to the panel opinion is part of the rule.

Future judges who aren’t bound by the precedent (either because they’re on another court or because they’re considering a case that is a step beyond the precedent) may also be more easily influenced by a past decision that makes only a small change. If a judge sees that the precedents imposed liability in four fairly similar situations A, B, C, and D, the judge may quickly conclude that the dominant rule is liability in all situations falling between A and D. If the judge sees that the precedents imposed liability in three similar situations A, B, C, and in a very different situation Z, the judge may be more likely to look closely and skeptically at the big change Z. This deference to closely clumped decisions is probably a rational ignorance effect—because judges, law clerks, and staff attorneys lack time to closely examine the merits of every potentially persuasive precedent, they spend more of their skepticism budget on outlier cases than on the ones that seem more consistent.

Decisions that make small changes may also be less criticized by academics or journalists. An article saying that some decision is a small change and a slight mistake is less interesting to write, and less likely to be read and admired, than one saying that another decision is a big change and a big mistake.

This effect may be strengthened to the extent that laypeople, lawyers, and other judges view judges as professionals exercising technical judgment within a system of rules. Deferring in some measure to people who are exercising professional judgment is usually seen as good sense and good manners. If that judgment diverges substantially from those reached by the professional’s peers, observers may review the judgment more skeptically. But if the judgment diverges only slightly from past decisions, observers might tend to defer, even if they wouldn’t fully agree were they reviewing the issue de novo.

And this effect is not limited to changes that are part of a judge’s deliberate campaign to alter some legal test. Some small changes can happen simply because judges are faithfully trying to apply a vague rule, and conclude that the rule should extend a bit beyond its previous applications (especially if extending the rule is viscerally appealing, perhaps because one side in the typical case seems so sympathetic). Moreover, judges’ ingrained habit of defending their decisions as being fully within the precedents may lead them to downplay—even to themselves—the broadening of the rule, and to describe the rule as having been this broad all along.

Thus, because of small change tolerance, a legal rule may evolve from A to B to C to D via a judicial-judicial slippery slope, even if legal decisionmakers would not have gone from A to D directly. And just as with legislative-legislative slippery slopes, those who strongly oppose D might therefore want to try to stop the process up front by arguing against A in the first place.

The post Judicial-Judicial Small Change Tolerance Slippery Slopes and the Extension of Precedent appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/WpNalVx
via IFTTT

“We’ve Been Here Before”: Bitcoin Breaks Below $20,000 As FundStrat Suggests “Final Washout”

“We’ve Been Here Before”: Bitcoin Breaks Below $20,000 As FundStrat Suggests “Final Washout”

Bitcoin prices dipped back below $20,000 this morning for the first time in a week, thanks to pressure on Asian stocks overnight, as the reprieve from the mid-month puke appears to be over for now…

Source: Bloomberg

This comes after a slew of recent developments in the crypto-lending markets…

Source: @LongConvexity

But perhaps we are getting closer to the ‘end’ of the forced liquidation phase as CoinTelegraph reports that a court in the British Virgin Islands on June 27 ordered the liquidation of Singapore-based 3AC, the British news agency Sky News reported on Wednesday.

The information in the report refers to an unspecified person familiar with the matter. Three Arrows Capital did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment.

The VC firm was estimated to incur $400 million in liquidations across multiple positions.

And as Mark Newton, technical strategist at Fundstrat, said in a note Tuesday:

“Most short-term technicals point to an above-average chance of a final ‘washout’-style decline before this bottoms.”

Bitcoin has room to drop as low as $12,500 to $13,000, “which I expect should be an excellent place for intermediate-term buyers to add to longs,” he wrote.

But, having said all that, as Steven Livera writes over at BitcoinMagazine.com,we’ve been here before and there are some silver linings

Some newer Bitcoiners could be upset about what’s gone on lately, especially if they were expecting very high highs for bitcoin or no large drawdowns. It seems like in the last few weeks, it has become evident that this is, in fact, a bear/sideways market.

From peak to trough, we’ve seen a 75% drop from $69,000 to around $17,600.

We’ve seen a “crypto contagion” of sorts, with the blow-up of the Luna/UST ponzi, the liquidation of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) and other “crypto” market participants undergoing stress, such as Celsius stopping withdrawals and other entities having exposure to 3AC (e.g., VoyagerBlockFi).

Recognizing where we are in the cycle can take a few months. It was similar in early 2018 after the $20,000 high in December 2017. Bitcoin’s price was bouncing around in the teens, and it was halfway through 2018 when it finally became clear to most people that it was a bear market. So, while bitcoin’s high of $69,000 last year was quite lofty, it was arguably the blow-up of Luna that kicked off the crypto contagion and made it more apparent that this is a bear market. After Luna blew up and the Luna 2.0 attempt fell flat, we saw Celsius block withdrawals. This became a stinging reminder to many a yield-chaser about the crucial lesson: “Not your keys, not your coins.”

There was a commonly-quoted statistic, “If you bought bitcoin and held for four years, you were never down,” which is no longer valid. Now, if we cherry pick, you could have purchased the December 2017 high of $19,600 and held through to the recent crash to $17,300. You’d be underwater over a roughly four-and-a-half-year period. In fairness, few people would actually be in this scenario, but nevertheless, it does change the statistic.

SO, WHAT IS THE SILVER LINING HERE?

Firstly, concerning the above “four-year HODLer” statistic, while it’s fair to say that specific cherry-picked individuals are down over a four-year period, it’s still true that all four-year regular stackers are up. Why is this so? Because people’s memories seem to be distorted to the highs of cycles.

So, for example, a lot of people are mentally anchoring to the 2017 top around $20,000, as though that was the price for the whole of 2017. But the reality is that bitcoin spent about 75% of 2017 under $5,000, and about 90% of 2017 under $10,000. So, if you were consistently long-term stacking, you are still up. You would have been accumulating all the way through, and in those times where bitcoin’s price was low (e.g., December 2018 or March 2020, around $3,000 to $4,000), you were accumulating more satoshis for your fiat. And now we have companies like Swan Bitcoin that explicitly help customers regularly stack sats with a long-term focus.

While the macro environment is challenging, investors worldwide are struggling to find a place to store their wealth. So, while the 60/40 stocks and bonds portfolio is having some of its worst times on record, and inflation is running high all around the world, this is precisely the time that traditional investors will be open to reconsidering their allocations. It’s also fair to say that bitcoin has already gone through its deleveraging cycle, while the pain in other asset classes may still continue. With all this pain in the bond markets, it’s completely reasonable for bond investors to decide they’d rather purchase some bitcoin, an asset that can’t be easily manipulated by governments and central banks around the world.

There’s another silver lining: people get another chance to stack cheaply. Those who say “early Bitcoiners had an unfair opportunity to get coins cheap or easy” have less ground to stand on. Bitcoin right now is relatively cheap and it’s a great chance to take ownership of some sats and stack them in your cold storage.

Then, maybe in a few years time, people will look back and say how “lucky” you were to be stacking in the $20,000 range. The reality of it is that any long-term HODLer or stacker has had to go through big peak-to-trough drawdowns. Bitcoin is no stranger to 80% drawdowns, with three in its lifetime so far, and with many lesser drawdowns of “only” 50%. I accept this volatility as the price to be paid for Bitcoin’s incredible qualities and increased purchasing power over the long term.

Even with the price around $21,000 in June 2022, the 10-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is around 120% per year. Can you even think of an asset class or index that outperformed this?

As the trope goes, bear markets are great for building. There will be a whole new crop of people who learned their lesson the hard way with Luna, Celsius, 3AC, Voyager, etc., and some fraction of them will now be ready to improve their technical knowledge of Bitcoin. They may even start building something in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Whether you want to build a company, grow your local meetup, or find a Bitcoin job, now is a great time. You might take this opportunity to connect with local Bitcoiners in your area to get the local Bitcoin meetup going, help onboard local merchants to accept bitcoin/Lightning Network payments, and practice your skills in event organization or Bitcoin education and presentation. Bear markets are often when you can find out who is truly committed to the cause, and this may help find the right kind of people to work with or learn from. Bear markets are also a time when experienced Bitcoiners can help new Bitcoiners going through their first bear market at the local meetup.

When the cycle turns and the bull market is back, you’re now in a better position having already built up your skills, meetup group, venture, business or project. You might have already established a small but loyal user base for your Bitcoin project, and they may help with contribution on the project or help share the word about it to their friends. If you’ve done a good enough job building your product or service, Bitcoiners will recommend it to their families and friends and you can “catch the next wave” in the next bull cycle.

BUILDING ON BITCOIN IN THE BEAR MARKET

The network effect of Lightning is growing steadily over time, and this is a great opportunity to slowly build circular economies and grow the peer-to-peer (P2P) aspect of Bitcoin, too. There are businesses accepting Lightning payments all around the world, and we’re seeing Lightning-enabled business models and projects. For example, podcasting 2.0 allows listeners to stream sats on apps like Sphinx, Breez and Fountain. It’s getting easier and easier to set up your BTCPay Server and Lightning node in just minutes with services like Voltage.cloud and take payment or build bitcoin/Lightning-enabled businesses. We’re seeing Lightning-enabled competitors to traditional news aggregator and discussion sites such as Stacker.News, and Lightning-enabled gaming companies such as THNDR Games and Zebedee.

The wallets are getting easier to use and more reliable, too. For newcoiners, Muun Wallet is a great fast setup choice because it really smooths over the difference between on-chain funds and Lightning. This makes it very easy for a new Bitcoiner to self custody, and also experience the “magic” of fast and cheap Lightning payments. In years gone by, doing larger payments on Lightning wasn’t so reliable unless you already had big channels, and new users would often get confused because they didn’t have inbound liquidity to receive a payment. But these things are improving over time, as wallets iterate and make the experience for new users smoother and easier.

We have the concept of Lightning service providers (LSPs), which are helping users with inbound liquidity/channels to permit them to receive sats quickly. We have the concept of “turbo channels” (aka, zero-confirmation channels) to help them receive/spend coins without waiting for the channel to confirm on-chain first (note: there are tradeoffs here, and you can disable this if you’re not comfortable with the trust assumptions. Generally, this is only done in specific scenarios to control the risk). I believe it now makes sense to onboard most western world newcoiners with non-custodial, Lightning-enabled mobile wallets and services, e.g., Muun, Phoenix and Breez.

If there was ever a time to grow the peer-to-peer and/or circular economy of Bitcoin, and help businesses and individuals directly sell their products and services for bitcoin, this is it. We’re seeing large services with millions of users enable Lightning, such as Cash App, Bitfinex, Kraken, Paxful, Chivo, OKcoin and other smaller companies. Robinhood stated it is enabling Lightning at Bitcoin 2022. So, upwards of 50 million people can spend with Lightning, even if many of those people don’t know it or understand yet! Bitcoin startups such as Oshi are helping Bitcoiners grow the Bitcoin merchant scene in their local area, and we see the likes of OpenNode and IBEX Mercado making their solution available for merchants, too.

THE GROWING PHILOSOPHIES OF BITCOIN

After seeing so many companies in the “crypto” space going through troubling times with stoppage of withdrawals and taking losses on loans or tokens, the “not your keys, not your coins” message will resonate strongly. Those who thought they were geniuses in the bull market for getting yield on their coins will now be ready to hear the message of using Bitcoin with their own wallets. It will be easier to make the argument for self custody versus the unsustainable or irresponsibly-risky yield being offered on “crypto” platforms. This may serve a lesson similar to how Mt. Gox’s failure in 2013 led to a resurgence in interest in self custody, and it was an easy, recent story that could be told to explain the dangers of custodial-ism and fractional reserve.

The human rights aspect of Bitcoin is growing, too. One great recent example is the Human Rights Foundation’s (HRF’s) Oslo Freedom Forum (OFF), which I attended recently. There, I heard stories of activists, journalists and technologists who are putting themselves on the line to fight tyranny. And in many cases, the speakers and attendees at OFF could instantly see the value proposition of being able to use Bitcoin, whether that is for fundraising or operating under adversarial conditions. This year, there was a Bitcoin academy, where Bitcoiners were teaching various aspects of how to use Bitcoin, bitcoin and privacy, and quickly setting up BTCPay Server.

It’s interesting that in parts of the western world, Bitcoin is derided as being just a plaything of the rich tech bros and high-net-worth speculators. But at HRF’s OFF, there were people from so many different countries, such as Togo, Ethiopia, Afghanistan and Ukraine, all who were using Bitcoin. And this could be either because they were dealing with authoritarian bank control or with inflation destroying their savings. I found that the HRF as an organization helps place Bitcoin and freedom in the proper context. While Twitter blue checks in the western world wring their hands about Bitcoin energy use or inequality, there 1.7 billion people in the world who are unbanked, and many living under high inflation. Sergej Kotliar from Bitrefill also had an excellent thread on what we’re really doing on here:

So, while irresponsible shitcoiners and degenerate yield farmers may have caused this recent sell down in bitcoin’s price, another silver lining is that the industry may now advance with a deeper appreciation for full reserve banking. We may see renewed interest in proof of reserves techniques so that exchanges and service providers may prove their bitcoin balances. We will also see more interest in non-custodial adoption. Instead of chasing “6% yield on your stables” only to be down in purchasing power anyway thanks to high inflation, we will continue growing out the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Remember that bitcoin spends a lot of time not at all time highs. But when bitcoin is off the all-time high, traditional media love to remind us of this fact. And yet the funny thing is, bitcoin is still dramatically up versus most other assets over the long term, it’s just not up by as much as it was recently.

So, at the end of the day, we’ve been here before, and we’ll be here again. Take it as an opportunity to stack sats, continue building, continue educating and advocating, and in a few years you will look back and realize that you made the right decision.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 08:12

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SAluMRa Tyler Durden

Judicial-Judicial Small Change Tolerance Slippery Slopes and the Extension of Precedent


slippery

[This month, I’m serializing my 2003 Harvard Law Review article, The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope.]

Just as precedents can be extended beyond their original terms through equality slippery slopes and attitude-altering slippery slopes, they can also be extended through small change tolerance slippery slopes.

Legal rules are often unavoidably vague at the margins. Even when a rule usually yields a clear result, there will often be some uncertainty on the border between the covered and the uncovered. If, for instance, a new free speech exception allows the punishment of “racial, sexual, and religious epithets,” some speech (for example, “nigger” or “kike”) would pretty clearly be covered. Other speech (for example, “blacks are inferior” or “Jews are conspiring to rule the world”) would clearly not be covered. For other speech (for example, “Jesus freak” or “Bible-thumper” or “son-of-a-bitch”), the result might be uncertain. {Some readers might conclude that some words in this last example are clearly epithets and other words are clearly not, but I suspect others would disagree. My point here is a descriptive one—that the result would indeed be uncertain—and not that the result should be uncertain.}

In such situations, the judge deciding each case has considerable flexibility. The test’s terms and the existing precedents leave a zone of possible decisions that will seem reasonable to most observers. If the judge draws the line at any place in that zone, most observers won’t much complain. This is a small change deference heuristic: if the distance between this case and the precedents is small enough, defer to the judge.

There can be various causes for this deference. Judges on a multi-member panel may defer to an authoring judge’s draft opinion because they know that they can’t debate every detail of the many cases that need to be decided; this isn’t rational ignorance as such, but more broadly rational management of the court’s time. Judges may also be reluctant to alienate sometimes prickly colleagues, with whom they must regularly work, by fighting seemingly minor battles. Thus, while each judge may in theory review the authoring judge’s draft de novo, in practice there’s some deference. And this effect will be even greater when judges are deciding whether to rehear a case en banc, where deference to the panel opinion is part of the rule.

Future judges who aren’t bound by the precedent (either because they’re on another court or because they’re considering a case that is a step beyond the precedent) may also be more easily influenced by a past decision that makes only a small change. If a judge sees that the precedents imposed liability in four fairly similar situations A, B, C, and D, the judge may quickly conclude that the dominant rule is liability in all situations falling between A and D. If the judge sees that the precedents imposed liability in three similar situations A, B, C, and in a very different situation Z, the judge may be more likely to look closely and skeptically at the big change Z. This deference to closely clumped decisions is probably a rational ignorance effect—because judges, law clerks, and staff attorneys lack time to closely examine the merits of every potentially persuasive precedent, they spend more of their skepticism budget on outlier cases than on the ones that seem more consistent.

Decisions that make small changes may also be less criticized by academics or journalists. An article saying that some decision is a small change and a slight mistake is less interesting to write, and less likely to be read and admired, than one saying that another decision is a big change and a big mistake.

This effect may be strengthened to the extent that laypeople, lawyers, and other judges view judges as professionals exercising technical judgment within a system of rules. Deferring in some measure to people who are exercising professional judgment is usually seen as good sense and good manners. If that judgment diverges substantially from those reached by the professional’s peers, observers may review the judgment more skeptically. But if the judgment diverges only slightly from past decisions, observers might tend to defer, even if they wouldn’t fully agree were they reviewing the issue de novo.

And this effect is not limited to changes that are part of a judge’s deliberate campaign to alter some legal test. Some small changes can happen simply because judges are faithfully trying to apply a vague rule, and conclude that the rule should extend a bit beyond its previous applications (especially if extending the rule is viscerally appealing, perhaps because one side in the typical case seems so sympathetic). Moreover, judges’ ingrained habit of defending their decisions as being fully within the precedents may lead them to downplay—even to themselves—the broadening of the rule, and to describe the rule as having been this broad all along.

Thus, because of small change tolerance, a legal rule may evolve from A to B to C to D via a judicial-judicial slippery slope, even if legal decisionmakers would not have gone from A to D directly. And just as with legislative-legislative slippery slopes, those who strongly oppose D might therefore want to try to stop the process up front by arguing against A in the first place.

The post Judicial-Judicial Small Change Tolerance Slippery Slopes and the Extension of Precedent appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/WpNalVx
via IFTTT

Futures Slide Amid Renewed Recession Fears After China Doubles Down On “Covid Zero”

Futures Slide Amid Renewed Recession Fears After China Doubles Down On “Covid Zero”

One day after futures ramped overnight (if only to crater during the regular session) on hopes China was easing its highly politicized  Zero Covid policy after it cut the time of quarantine lockdowns, this morning futures slumped early on after China’s President Xi Jinping made clear that Covid Zero isn’t going anywhere and remains the most “economic and effective” policy for China during a symbolic visit to the virus ground zero in Wuhan, in which he cast the strategy as proof of the superiority of the country’s political system. That coupled with renewed recession worries (market is again pricing in a rate cut in Q1 2023) even as monetary policy tightens in much of the world to fight supply-side inflation, sent US futures and global markets lower. S&P futures dropped 0.2% and Nasdaq 100 futures were down 0.4% after the underlying index slumped on 3.1% on Tuesday. The dollar was steady after rising the most in over a week while WTI crude climbed above $112 a barrel, set for a fourth session of gains. In cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin dipped below the closely watched $20,000 level on news crypto hedge fund 3 Arrows Capital was ordered to liquidate.

The Nasdaq’s Tuesday’s slump added to what was already one of the worst years in terms of big daily selloffs in US stocks. The S&P 500 Index has fallen 2% or more on 14 occasions, putting 2022 in the top 10 list, according to Bloomberg data.

Not helping the tech sector, on Wednesday morning JPMorgan cut its earnings estimates across the sector, especially for companies exposed to online advertising, citing macroeconomic pressures, forex and company-specific dynamics.

One of the chief drivers for overnight weakness, China’s Xi said during a trip Tuesday to Wuhan where the virus first emerged in late 2019 that relaxing Covid controls would risk too many lives in the world’s most populous country. China would rather endure some temporary impact on economic development than let the virus hurt people’s safety and health, he said, in remarks reported Wednesday by state media. As a result, China’s CSI 300 Index extended loss to 1.4% after the headline, while the yuan drops as much as 0.2% to trade 6.7132 against the dollar in the offshore market.

Among key premarket movers, Tesla slipped in US premarket trading. The electric-vehicle maker laid off hundreds of workers on its Autopilot team as it shuttered a California facility, according to people familiar with the matter. Carnival slumped as Morgan Stanley analysts warned that the London and New York-listed cruise vacation company’s shares could lose all their value in the event of another demand shock. Pinterest gained 3.7% as the company’s co- founder and CEO Ben Silbermann quit and handed the reins to Google and PayPal veteran Bill Ready in a sign the social-media company will focus more on e-commerce. Also, despite the pervasive weakness, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund ETF (XLE) rebounded off key support (50% Fibonacci) relative to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). That said, energy was alone and most other notable movers were down in the premarket:

  • Carnival (CCL US) shares fall 8% premarket as Morgan Stanley analysts warned that the cruise vacation firm’s shares could lose all their value in the event of another demand shock.
  • Nio (NIO US) shares drop 8.2% after short-seller Grizzly Research published a report on Tuesday alleging that the electric carmaker used battery sales to a related party to inflate revenue and boost net income margins. The company rejected the claims.
  • Upstart Holdings (UPST US) shares slump about 9% after Morgan Stanley downgraded the consumer finance company to underweight from equal-weight amid rising cyclical headwinds.
  • Ormat Technologies (ORA US) rallies as much as 5% after the renewable energy company is set to be included in the S&P Midcap 400 Index.
  • 2U (TWOU US) shares rise 16% premarket. Indian online-education provider Byju’s has offered to buy the company in a cash deal that values the US-listed edtech firm at more than $1 billion, a person familiar with the matter said.
  • Watch Amazon (AMZN US) shares as Redburn initiated coverage of the stock with a buy recommendation and set a Street-high price target, saying “there is a clear path toward a $3 trillion value for AWS alone.”
  • Shares in data center REITs could be active later in the trading session after short-seller Jim Chanos said in an FT interview that he’s betting against “legacy” data centers. Watch Digital Realty (DLR US) and Equinix (EQIX US), as well as data center operators Cyxtera Technologies (CYXT US) and Iron Mountain (IRM US)

Investors are growing increasingly skeptical that the Fed can avoid a bruising economic downturn amid sharp interest-rate hikes. Evaporating consumer confidence is feeding into concerns that the US might tip into a recession. Naturally, Fed officials sought to play down recession risk. New York Fed President John Williams and San Francisco’s Mary Daly both acknowledged they had to cool inflation, but insisted that a soft landing was still possible.

“It seems the market is in this tug of war between on the one hand the hope that we are close to the peak in inflation and rates, and on the other hand the challenge of a slowing economy and potential recession,” Emmanuel Cau, head of European equity strategy at Barclays Bank Plc, said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. “Central banks are walking a very tight line and to a certain extent dictate the mood in the markets.”

European equities snapped three days of gains, trading poorly but off worst levels with sentiment also hurt by China remaining committed to its zero-Covid approach. Spanish inflation unexpectedly surged to a record, dashing hopes that inflation in the euro zone’s fourth-biggest economy had peaked, and emboldening European Central Bank policy makers pushing for big increases in interest rates. The ECB should consider raising interest rates by twice the planned amount next month if the inflation outlook deteriorates, according to Governing Council member Gediminas Simkus, as calls not to exclude an outsized initial move grow. German benchmark bonds rose, while 10-year Treasury yields slipped to 3.16%. DAX lags, dropping as much as 1.8%. Real estate, autos and miners are the worst performing sectors.

In notable moves in European stocks, Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) gained after the Swedish low-cost retailer’s earnings beat analyst estimates. Just Eat Takeaway.com NV tumbled to a record low after Berenberg analysts rated the stock sell, saying the food delivery firm’s UK business will remain under pressure. Here are some of the biggest European movers today:

  • Just Eat Takeaway shares plunge as much as 21% after Berenberg initiated coverage with a sell rating, saying the firm’s UK business will remain under pressure and a sale of its Grubhub unit is unlikely to satisfy the bulls.
  • Carnival stocks slumped over 12% in London as Morgan Stanley analysts warned that the cruise vacation firm’s shares could lose all their value in the event of another demand shock.
  • Pearson drops as much as 6.1% after the education company was cut to sell at UBS, which reduced forecasts to reflect a weak outlook for 2022 college enrollments.
  • Grifols shares plunge as much as 13% on a media report the Spanish plasma firm is weighing a capital raise of as much as EU2b to cut its debt.
  • Diageo shares fall after downgrades for the spirits group from Deutsche Bank and Kepler Cheuvreux, while Pernod Ricard also dips on a rating cut from the latter.
  • Diageo declines as much as 4.2%, Pernod Ricard -3.7%
  • Fluidra shares fall as much as 8.4% after Santander cut its rating on the Spanish swimming pools company. The bank’s analyst Alejandro Conde cut the recommendation to neutral from outperform.
  • H&M shares rise as much as 6.8% after the Swedish apparel retailer reported 2Q earnings that beat estimates. Jefferies said the margin beat in particular was reassuring, while Morgan Stanley said it was a “positive surprise” overall.
  • Ipsen shares rise as much as 3.1% after UBS analyst Michael Leuchten said that accepting palovarotene refiling priority review should be a net present value and confidence boost.

Asian stocks fell, halting a four-day gain, as renewed angst over the outlook for global economic growth and inflation help drive a selloff across most of the region’s equity markets. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index dropped as much as 1.5%, led by consumer discretionary and information sectors. Chinese equities in particular took a hit, as the CSI 300 Index fell 1.5% Wednesday after Xi Jinping reiterated his firm stance on Covid zero. Tech-heavy indexes in markets such as South Korea and Taiwan took the brunt of Wednesday’s drop amid lingering concerns that monetary tightening in much of the world to fight inflation will cause an economic slowdown. While Federal Reserve members have played down the risk of a US recession, gloomy data such as US consumer confidence have damped investor sentiment.

“Volatility is going to be the enduring feature of the market, I suspect, for the next couple of quarters at least until we get a firm sense that peak inflation has passed,” John Woods, Credit Suisse Group AG’s Asia-Pacific chief investment officer, said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. “Markets, I think, have aggressively priced in quite a serious or steep recession.”  China’s four-day winning streak came to a halt, putting its advance toward a bull market on hold.  “We will continue to see a risk of targeted lockdowns, and that spoils the initial euphoria seen in the markets from the announcement on relaxation of quarantine requirements,” said Charu Chanana, market strategist at Saxo Capital Markets. “Still, economic growth will likely be prioritized as this is a politically important year for China.” 

Japanese equities decline as investors digested data that showed a drop in US consumer confidence over inflation worries and increased concerns of an economic downturn.  The Topix Index fell 0.7% to 1,893.57 in Tokyo on Wednesday, while the Nikkei declined 0.9% to 26,804.60. Toyota Motor Corp. contributed the most to the Topix’s decline, decreasing 1.8%. Out of 2,170 shares in the index, 1,114 fell, 984 rose and 72 were unchanged. “There are concerns about stagflation,” said Hideyuki Suzuki a general manager at SBI Securities. “The consumer sentiment from the University of Michigan, which provides one of the fastest data points, has already shown poor figures.”

Stocks in India tracked their Asian peers lower as brent rose to the highest level in two weeks, while high inflation and slowing global growth continued to dampen risk-appetite for global equities. The S&P BSE Sensex fell 0.3% to 53,026.97 in Mumbai, while the NSE Nifty 50 Index declined by an equal measure. Both gauges have lost more than 4% in June and are set for their third consecutive month of declines. The main indexes have dropped for all but one month this year. Twelve of the 19 sub-sector gauges compiled by BSE Ltd. eased, led by banking companies while power producers were the top performers.   Investors will also be watching the expiry of monthly derivative contracts on Thursday, which may lead to some volatility in the markets.  Hindustan Unilever was the biggest contributor to the Sensex’s decline, decreasing 3.5%. Out of 30 shares in the Sensex, 10 rose and 20 fell.

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index inched up modestly as the greenback traded mixed against its Group-of-10 peers; the Swiss franc led gains while Antipodean currencies were the worst performers and the euro traded in a narrow range around $1.05. The relative cost to own optionality in the euro heading into the July meetings of the ECB and the Federal Reserve was too low for investors to ignore and has become less and less underpriced. The yen strengthened and US and Japanese bond yields fell.

In rates, fixed income has a choppy start. Bund futures initially surged just shy of 200 ticks on a soft regional German CPI print before fading the entire move over the course of the morning as Spanish data hit the tape, delivering a surprise record 10% reading for June and more hawkish ECB comments crossed the wires. Treasuries and gilts followed with curves eventually fading a bull-steepening move. Long-end gilts underperform, cheapening ~4bps near 2.75%. Peripheral spreads are tighter to core. 

Treasuries are slightly higher as US trading day begins, off the session lows reached as bund futures jumped after the first monthly drop since November in a German regional CPI gauge. Yields are lower across the curve, by 1bp-2bp for tenors out to the 10-year with long-end yields little changed; 10-year declined as much as 5.3bp vs as much as 8.2bp for German 10- year, which remains lower by ~3bp. Focal points for the US session include a final revision of 1Q GDP, comments by Fed Chair Powell, and anticipation of quarter-end flows favoring bonds. Quarter-end is anticipated to cause rebalancing flows into bonds; Wells Fargo estimated that $5b will be added to bonds, with most of the flows occurring Wednesday and Thursday.

In commodities, crude futures advance. WTI drifts 0.3% higher to trade near $112.13. Base metals are mixed; LME tin falls 5.6% while LME zinc gains 0.4%. Spot gold falls roughly $5 to trade near $1,815/oz

Looking ahead, the highlight will be the panel at the ECB Forum that includes Fed Chair Powell, ECB President Lagarde and BoE Governor Bailey. We’ll also be hearing from ECB Vice President de Guindos, the ECB’s Schnabel, the Fed’s Mester and Bullard, and the BoE’s Dhingra. On the data side, releases include German CPI for June, Euro Area money supply for May, and the final Euro Area consumer confidence reading for June. From the US, we’ll also get the third reading of Q1 GDP.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures little changed at 3,829.00
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.8% to 412.69
  • MXAP down 1.3% to 159.96
  • MXAPJ down 1.6% to 531.04
  • Nikkei down 0.9% to 26,804.60
  • Topix down 0.7% to 1,893.57
  • Hang Seng Index down 1.9% to 21,996.89
  • Shanghai Composite down 1.4% to 3,361.52
  • Sensex little changed at 53,204.17
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.9% to 6,700.23
  • Kospi down 1.8% to 2,377.99
  • German 10Y yield little changed at 1.59%
  • Euro little changed at $1.0510
  • Brent Futures down 0.4% to $117.46/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.2% to $1,816.09
  • U.S. Dollar Index little changed at 104.55

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • The Fed’s Loretta Mester said she wants to see the benchmark lending rate reach 3% to 3.5% this year and “a little bit above 4% next year” to rein in price pressures even if that tips the economy into a recession
  • The ECB should consider raising interest rates by twice the planned amount next month if the inflation outlook deteriorates, according to Governing Council member Gediminas Simkus, as calls not to exclude an outsized initial move grow
  • ECB has “ample room” to hike in 25bps-50bps steps to “whatever rate we think, we consider reasonable,” Governing Council member Robert Holzmann said in interview with CNBC
  • Swedish consumers are gloomier than they have been since the mid-1990s, as prices surge on everything from fuel to food and furniture
  • China’s President Xi Jinping declared Covid Zero the most “economic and effective” policy for the nation, during a symbolic visit to Wuhan in which he cast the strategy as proof of the superiority of the country’s political system
  • NATO moved one step closer to bolstering its eastern front with Russia after Turkey dropped its opposition to Swedish and Finnish bids to join the military alliance

A more detailed look at markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asia-Pac stocks were pressured amid headwinds from the US where disappointing Consumer Confidence data added to the growth concerns. ASX 200 failed to benefit from better than expected Retail Sales and was dragged lower by weakness in miners and tech. Nikkei 225 fell beneath the 27,000 level as industries remained pressured by the ongoing power crunch. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp. conformed to the negative picture in the region although losses in the mainland were initially stemmed after China cut its quarantine requirements which the National Health Commission caveated was not a relaxation but an optimization to make it more scientific and precise.

Top Asian News

  • Chinese President Xi said China’s COVID prevention control and strategy is correct and effective and must stick with it, via state media. Shanghai will gradually reopen museums and scenic sports from July 1st, state media reports.
  • US Deputy Commerce Secretary Graves said the US will take a balanced approach on Chinese tariffs and that a clear response on China tariffs is coming soon, according to Bloomberg.
  • China State Council’s Taiwan Affairs Office said it firmly opposes the US signing any agreement that has sovereign connotations with Taiwan, according to Global Times.
  • BoJ Governor Kuroda said Japanese Core CPI reached 2.1% in April and May which is almost fully due to international energy prices and Japan’s economy has not been affected much by the global inflationary trend so monetary policy will stay accommodative, according to Reuters.
  • Japanese govt to issue power supply shortage warning for a fourth consecutive day on Thursday, according to a statement.

European bourses are on the backfoot as the region plays catch-up to the losses on Wall Street yesterday. Sectors are mostly lower (ex-Energy) with a defensive tilt as Healthcare, Consumer Products, Food & Beverages, and Utilities are more cushioned than their cyclical peers. Stateside, US equity futures trade on either side of the unchanged mark with no stand-out performers thus far, with the contracts awaiting the next catalyst.

Top European News

  • UK expects defence spending to reach 2.3% of GDP and said PM Johnson will announce new military commitments to NATO, according to Reuters.
  • UK Weighs Capping Maximum Stake in Online Casinos at £5
  • Europe Is the Only Region Where Earnings Estimates Are Rising
  • European Gas Prices Rise as Supply Risks Add to Storage Concerns
  • Gold Steady as Traders Weigh Fed Comments on US Recession Risks
  • Choppy Start for Euro-Area Bonds on Mixed Inflation

FX

  • Dollar mostly bid otherwise as rebalancing demand underpins – DXY pivots 104.500 within 104.700-350 confines.
  • Franc outperforms on rate and risk considerations – Usd/Chf breaches 0.9550 and Eur/Chf approaches parity.
  • Euro erratic in line with conflicting inflation data – Eur/Usd rotates around 1.0500.
  • Aussie and Kiwi undermined by downturn in sentiment – Aud/Usd loses 0.6900+ status, Nzd/Usd wanes from just over 0.6250.
  • Yen rangy following firmer than forecast Japanese retail sales and BoJ Governor Kuroda reaffirming intent to remain accommodative – Usd/Jpy straddles 136.00.
  • Nokkie welcomes oil worker wage agreement with unions to avert strike action, but Sekkie hampered by softer Swedish macro releases pre-Riksbank policy call tomorrow – Eur/Nok probes 10.3000, Eur/Sek hovers around 10.6800.
  • Rand rattled by decline in Gold and ongoing SA power supply problems, but Rouble rallies irrespective of CBR and Russian Economy Ministry divergence over deflation.

Central Banks

  • ECB’s Lane said there are two-way inflation risks: “on the one side, there could be forces that keep inflation higher than expected for longer. On the other side, we do have the risk of a slowdown in the economy, which would reduce inflationary pressure”, via ECB.
  • ECB’s Holzmann said “We will have to make an assessment where the economic development is going and where inflation stands and afterwards there’s ample room to hike in 0.25 and 0.5 levels to whatever rate we think, we consider reasonable” via CNBC.
  • ECB’s Simkus said if data worsens, then he wants a 50bps July hike as an option, 50bps hike is very likely in September; ECB’s fragmentation tool should serve as a deterrent, via Bloomberg.
  • ECB’s Herodotou said EZ inflation will peak this year, via CNBC.
  • ECB’s Wunsch said government aid may spell more rate hikes, via Bloomberg; 150bps of hikes by March 2023 is reasonable
  • ECB is said to be weighting whether or not they should announce the size and duration of their upcoming bond-buying scheme, according to Reuters sources.
  • Fed’s Mester (2022, 2024 voter) said on a path towards restrictive interest rates; July debate between 50bps and 75bps hike, via CNBC. Mester said if inflation expectations become unanchored, monetary policy would have to act more forcefully; current inflation situation is a very challenging one, via Reuters.
  • SARB Governor said a 50bps hike is “not off the table”, Via Bloomberg
  • CBR Governor said she does not see risks of deflation; sees room to cut rates; sticking to policy of floating RUB exchange rate.
  • PBoC will step up implementation of prudent monetary policy, will keep liquidity reasonably ample.

Fixed Income

  • Bunds unwind all and a bit more of their hefty post-NRW CPI gains as other German states show smaller inflation slowdowns and Spanish HICP soars.
  • Gilts suffer more pronounced fall from grace in relative terms and US Treasuries slip from overnight peaks in sympathy.
  • UK debt and STIRs also await testimony from MPC member elect to see if newbie leans dovish, hawkish or middle of the road
  • 10 year benchmarks settle off worst levels within 147.37-145.14, 112.66-11.85 and 117-12+/116-27 respective ranges awaiting comments from ECB, Fed and BoE heads at Sintra Forum.

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent front-month futures traded with no firm direction in early European hours before picking up modestly in recent trade.
  • US Private Inventory (bbls): Crude -3.8mln (exp. -0.6mln), Cushing -0.7mln, Distillate +2.6mln (exp. -0.2mln) and Gasoline +2.9mln (exp. -0.1mln).
  • Norway’s Industri Energi and SAFE labour unions agreed a wage deal for oil drilling workers and will not go on strike, according to Reuters.
  • OPEC to start today at 12:00BST/07:00EDT; JMMC on Thursday at 12:00BST/07:00EDT followed by OPEC+ at 12:30BST/07:30EDT, via EnergyIntel.
  • Libya’s NOC suspends oil exports from Es Sider port.
  • Spot gold is under some mild pressure as the Buck and Bond yields picked up, with the yellow metal back to near-two-week lows
  • Base metals are mixed but off best levels after President Xi reaffirmed China’s COVID stance – LME copper fell back under USD 8,500/t

US Event Calendar

  • 07:00: June MBA Mortgage Applications, prior 4.2%
  • 08:30: 1Q PCE Core QoQ, est. 5.1%, prior 5.1%
  • 08:30: 1Q GDP Price Index, est. 8.1%, prior 8.1%
  • 08:30: 1Q Personal Consumption, est. 3.1%, prior 3.1%
  • 08:30: 1Q GDP Annualized QoQ, est. -1.5%, prior -1.5%

Central Banks

  • 09:00: Powell Takes Part in Panel Discussion at ECB Forum in Sintra
  • 09:00: Lagarde, Powell, Bailey, Carstens Speak in Sintra
  • 11:30: Fed’s Mester Speaks on Panel at ECB Forum in Sintra
  • 13:05: Fed’s Bullard Makes Introductory Remarks

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

I’m finishing this off in a taxi on the way to the Eurostar this morning and I made the mistake of telling the driver I was slightly pressed for time. He seems to be taking the racing line everywhere and my motion sickness is kicking in.

A little like this car journey, it’s been another volatile 24 hours in markets, with a succession of weak data releases raising further questions about how close the US and Europe might be to a recession. That saw equities give up their initial gains to post a decent decline on the day, whilst there was little respite from central bankers either, with sovereign bonds selling off further as multiple speakers doubled down on their hawkish rhetoric. That comes ahead of another eventful day ahead on the calendar, with investors primarily focused on a panel featuring Fed Chair Powell, ECB President Lagarde and BoE Governor Bailey, as well as the flash German CPI print for June, who are the first G7 economy to release their inflation print for the month, which will provide some further clues on how fast central banks will need to move on rate hikes. Just as we go to print the NRW region of Germany has seen CPI print at 7.5% YoY, way below last month’s 8.1%. This region is around a quarter of GDP so it could imply the national numbers will be notably softer when we get them later. The energy tax cuts were always going to come through in June so some respite was always possible but at first glance this seems materially below what might have been expected.

This comes after a significant sovereign bond selloff in Europe once again yesterday as President Lagarde reiterated the central bank’s determination to bring down inflation, and described inflation pressures that were “broadening and intensifying”. And although Lagarde stuck to the existing script about the ECB raising rates by 25bps at the next meeting, we also heard from Latvia’s Kazaks who said that “front-loading the increase would be a reasonable choice” in the event that the situation with inflation or inflation expectations deteriorates. Lagarde did nod to this in part, saying that if the ECB was “to see higher inflation threatening to de-anchor inflation expectations, or signs of a more permanent loss of economic potential that limits resources availability, we would need to withdraw accommodation more promptly to stamp out the risk of a self-fulfilling spiral.” Separately on fragmentation, Lagarde said that they could “use flexibility in reinvesting redemptions” from PEPP starting July 1 in order to deal with the issue.

For now, overnight index swaps are only pricing in a +31.3bps move in July from the ECB, so still closer to 25 than 50 for the time being. Meanwhile the rate priced in by year-end rose also by +7.9bps as investors interpreted the comments in a hawkish light. That supported a further rise in yields, with those on 10yr bunds up another +8.1bps yesterday, following on from their +10.7bps move in the previous session. That’s now almost reversed the -21.9ps move over the previous week, which itself was the third-largest weekly decline in bund yields for a decade, and brought the 10yr yield back up to 1.63%, so not far off its multi-year high of 1.77% seen last week. A similar pattern was seen elsewhere, with 10yr yields on 10yr OATs (+9.6bps), BTPs (+4.2bps) and gilts (+7.2bps) all moving higher too.

Things turned near the European close with some poor US data releases piling on to some lacklustre confidence figures in Europe. Earlier in the day the GfK consumer confidence reading from Germany fell to -27.4 (vs. -27.3 expected), taking it to another record low. Separately in France, consumer confidence fell to 82 on the INSEE’s measure (vs. 84 expected), which we haven’t seen since 2013. Then in the US, the Conference Board’s measure fell to 98.7 (vs. 100.0 expected), which is the lowest since February 2021. The Conference Board’s one-year ahead inflation expectations hit a record high of 8.0%, surpassing the June 2008 record of 7.7%, adding to the pessimism. Along with waning confidence, the Richmond Fed’s Manufacturing Index registered a -19, its lowest since the peak onset of the pandemic, versus expectations of -7 and a prior of -9, showing that production data has weakened as well. This put a serious damper on risk sentiment which drove Treasury yields and equities lower intraday during the New York session.

10yr Treasury yields ended down -2.8bps after trading as much as +5.5bps higher during the European session. They are down another -4bps this morning. Concerningly as well, there was a fresh flattening in the Fed’s preferred yield curve indicator (which is 18m3m – 3m), which came down another -9.1bps to 165bps, which is the flattest its been since early March.

With that succession of bad news helping to dampen risk appetite, US equities gave up their opening gains to leave the S&P 500 down -2.01% on the day. Tech stocks saw the worst losses, with the NASDAQ (-2.98%) and the FANG+ (-3.74%) seeing even larger declines. And whilst there was a stronger performance in Europe, the STOXX 600 ended the day up just +0.27%, having been as high as +0.95% in the couple of hours before the close.

We didn’t hear so much from the Fed ahead of Chair Powell’s appearance today, although New York Fed President Williams said that at the upcoming July meeting “I think 50 to 75 is clearly going to be the debate”. Markets are continuing to price something in between the two, although since the last Fed meeting futures have been consistently closer to 75 than 50, with 69.0 bps right now.

Those sharp losses in US equities are echoing across Asia this morning. The Hang Seng (-1.86%) is leading the losses followed by the Kospi (-1.82%), the Nikkei (-1.07%) and the ASX 200 (-1.06%). Over in mainland China, the Shanghai Composite (-0.77%) and the CSI (-0.80%) are slightly out-performing after yesterday’s surprise move by China to slash the quarantine period for inbound travellers (more on this below). Looking ahead, US stock index futures point to a positive opening with contracts on the S&P 500 (+0.18%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.19%) mildly higher.

Earlier today, data released showed that Japan’s retail sales advanced for the third consecutive month in May (+3.6% y/y) but lower than the consensus of +4.0%, but with the previous month’s data revised up to +3.1% (vs +2.9% preliminary). Meanwhile, South Korea’s consumer sentiment index (CSI) fell sharply to 96.4 in June (vs 102.6 in May), sliding below the long-term average of 100 for the first time since Feb 2021. Separately, Australia’s retail sales put in another strong performance as it climbed +0.9% m/m in May, surpassing analyst estimates of a +0.4% increase.

Oil has fallen back slightly overnight after three sessions of gains with Brent futures down -0.84% at $116.99 and WTI futures (-0.64%) at $111.04/bbl as I type.

Just after we went to press yesterday, it was also announced that China would be shortening the required quarantine period for inbound travellers to one week from two. So although China is still very-much committed to a Covid-zero strategy for the time being, this step towards loosening rather than tightening restrictions is an interesting development that helped support Chinese equities in yesterday’s session towards the close which filtered through into early northern hemisphere risk performance.

In terms of other data yesterday, there were signs that US house price growth might finally be slowing somewhat, with the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller index up by +20.4% in April, which is down slightly from the +20.6% gain in March. So still a long way from an absolute decline, but that marks a reversal in the trend after the previous 4 months of rises in the year-on-year measure.

To the day ahead now, and the highlight will likely be the panel at the ECB Forum that includes Fed Chair Powell, ECB President Lagarde and BoE Governor Bailey. We’ll also be hearing from ECB Vice President de Guindos, the ECB’s Schnabel, the Fed’s Mester and Bullard, and the BoE’s Dhingra. On the data side, releases include German CPI for June, Euro Area money supply for May, and the final Euro Area consumer confidence reading for June. From the US, we’ll also get the third reading of Q1 GDP.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 08:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Ll1YiJN Tyler Durden

Arizona’s New Law Funds Students, Not Just Government-Run Schools


Elementary school students running around a park under a blue sky.

It’s good to watch your state lose its lead as a school choice innovator not because it’s backsliding, but because other states are making it easier for families to pick education options for their kids. It’s even better when your state reclaims the lead through increased freedom. Last week, my state of Arizona did just that with the passage of a law expanding the use of education savings accounts (ESA) that let education funding follow students to their families’ preferred learning environments rather than locking them into one-size-fits-some government institutions.

Once favored by officials across party lines, educational freedom has, in recent years, become a partisan issue mostly supported by Republicans and opposed by Democrats (with commendable exceptions such as Gov. Jared Polis (D–Colo.) a champion of charter schools, and other less impressive ones such as the GOP lawmakers who blocked choice in Iowa). That was the case last week when HB 2853 passed on a party-line vote. It was guaranteed Republican Gov. Doug Ducey’s support given that he not only called for school choice legislation in January, but boasted at the close of the legislative term that “we enacted the most expansive school choice legislation in the nation.”

First introduced in Arizona in 2011, Empowerment Scholarship Accounts, as ESAs are called in the state, let parents receive 90 percent of state per-student base spending to be deposited into savings accounts to be used for educational expenses such as tuition, learning therapies, and tutoring (actual awards average about $6,400 per child, excluding extra funding for special-needs children which more than doubles the amount). Until this new legislation, qualified students included those with disabilities, in failing public schools, wards of the court, children of active-duty military members, residents of Indian reservations, and other categories. EdChoice, an education-policy organization, estimates that 23 percent of students in the state currently qualify for the program. The new law drops most qualification requirements for participation in the program.

Last week’s successful vote “Expands eligibility for the Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program to every family in Arizona,” comments Arizona’s Goldwater Institute, which advocated for passage. “Families would receive over $6,500 per year per child for private school, homeschooling, ‘learning pods,’ tutoring, or any other kinds of educational service that would best fit their students’ needs.”

Notably, participation in the program is now open to any state resident eligible to enroll in kindergarten through 12th grade in Arizona’s public schools. That means that tax money earmarked for education use in the state is no longer tied to brick-and-mortar buildings run by government bureaucrats. The money can follow students to where they learn best.

“Last year, West Virginia wrested the ‘most expansive ESA’ title away from Arizona with the enactment of its Hope Scholarship policy, which provides ESAs to all students either switching out of a public school or entering kindergarten,” writes Jason Bedrick, a research fellow with The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Education Policy. “Once Ducey, a Republican, signs the ESA expansion into law, Arizona will regain its ‘most expansive ESA’ distinction, because the accounts will be available to all students, regardless of what type of school they had been attending.”

Historically, school choice has been available to wealthier families and those willing to make sacrifices in order to afford tuition or homeschool their kids even as they pay taxes to support government institutions that don’t work for them. ESAs are one way of extending choice to families that have more limited resources so that they aren’t stuck with the reading-and-writing equivalent of the Department of Motor Vehicles.

“The average ESA award covers 100% of the median private elementary school tuition and fee rate in Arizona, putting private education within financial reach of even the most economically disadvantaged,” the Goldwater Institute concluded when it reviewed the program in 2019. “The 10 districts where ESAs are most popular in Arizona are overwhelmingly socioeconomically disadvantaged. The three districts with the highest concentrations of ESA students have child poverty rates more than double the state average.”

Making education options available to families so they can pick what’s right for their children is obviously popular with families, and it’s also effective at improving outcomes.

“The country’s largest private school choice program, which enrolls largely low-income students from low-income schools, has a positive effect on college-going and graduation rates,” the Urban Institute found in 2019 when it examined Florida’s Tax Credit Scholarship Program.

Education freedom promises not just better academic outcomes, but the potential for social peace. After years of continuing battles over racialized lessons, pandemic policy, politicized curricula, and gender norms, ESAs and other means of enhancing choice offer a simple solution: “You educate your kids your way, and I’ll educate my kids my way.” It’s an elegant fix that should raise objections only from those who insist on controlling other people’s children. 

Arizona has been down this path before, it should be noted. A similar proposal was beat back in 2018 by a confusingly framed ballot measure pushed by enemies of education freedom, despite polling indicating plurality support for choice. The same groups promise to again try to block the extension of choice to Arizona’s families.

But the last vote took place at the height of the #RedForEd movement, when teachers unions peddled the idea that shoveling money to their members was the way to support education. Since then, government-run schools bungled the challenge of teaching kids during the COVID-19 pandemic and teachers unions and their allies treated parents with contempt. Many families have had it with public schools and their self-serving bureaucracies. Now, political scuffles over expanded education freedom take place in an environment in which unions burned their credibility and many more families have explored and become comfortable with homes-based education, private schools, microschooling, charters, and other alternatives to the old default.

“The global COVID-19 pandemic has sparked new interest in homeschooling and the appeal of alternative school arrangements has suddenly exploded,” the Census Bureau noted last year.

Arizona’s new law should make alternative school arrangements more accessible than ever to families interested in educating their kids instead of funding bureaucracies. Other states would be well-advised to follow suit.

The post Arizona's New Law Funds Students, Not Just Government-Run Schools appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/PZekYbI
via IFTTT

“Bullsh*t”: Claim Trump “Lunged” For Steering Wheel On Jan 6 Discredited By Secret Service

“Bullsh*t”: Claim Trump “Lunged” For Steering Wheel On Jan 6 Discredited By Secret Service

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

The January 6 Committee’s credibility has plummeted after claims by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson that President Trump “lunged” for the steering wheel of his vehicle and demanded to be taken to the site of the riots were contradicted by the lead Secret Service agent.

Hutchinson testified that Tony Ornato, the then-White House deputy chief of staff, told her that Trump said something like, “I’m the f-ing president, take me up to the Capitol now,” and had “reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel” before then using “his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel,” the the presidential driver.

Despite the legacy media breathlessly reporting Hutchinson’s claims without much skepticism, the term ‘Amber Heard 2.0’ subsequently trended on Twitter as Hutchinson’s assertions were demolished.

Within hours, Peter Alexander of NBC News revealed that Engel was prepared to testify “under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.”

Trump himself also asserted that the incident never happened.

Secret Service sources also reporter Julio Rosas that the story is “bullshit.”

Hutchinson appears to be pursuing a personal vendetta against Trump because he “personally turned her request her down” when she tried to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

Hutchinson also apparently told another outright lie during her testimony when she claimed she had written a note of a statement for Trump to release on January 6.

The note was actually penned by Former Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann.

“The handwritten note that Cassidy Hutchinson testified was written by her was in fact written by Eric Herschmann on January 6, 2021,” a spokesperson for Herschmann told ABC News Tuesday evening.

It remains to be seen whether Hutchinson will face any consequences for apparently lying under oath, although the already dubious credibility of the January 6 Committee has taken a further massive blow.

“The January 6 committee clowned itself,” summarized Tim Young.

* * *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 07:21

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xYWQ3Zf Tyler Durden

Joe Biden Covered Hunter’s Russia-Linked Hooker Tab; Leaked Audio Proves Joe Spoke Of Dealings

Joe Biden Covered Hunter’s Russia-Linked Hooker Tab; Leaked Audio Proves Joe Spoke Of Dealings

President Joe Biden inadvertently paid son Hunter’s tab to a Russia-linked escort ring, the Washington Examiner reports, citing records from the first son’s infamous laptop.

After Hunter spent more than $30,000 on prostitutes between November 2018 and March 2019 – including several who use “.ru” email addresses linked to Russia, and an “exclusive model agency,” UberGFE, Joe wired $5,000 while Hunter was “actively engaged” with an escort.

Hunter Biden disclosed in text messages with a woman named Eva, the go-between who served as his primary point of contact for UberGFE, that his accounts were temporarily frozen at one point because his attempted payments to her “girls” with Russian email accounts were too much of a “red flag” for his bank. Eva refers to him as Robert in the messages, which is his birth name. -Washington Examiner

Hunter also convinced Joe to send $20,000 more, claiming it was to pay for drug rehab in New York, but which never actually happened.

The Examiner notes that there’s no suggestion that Joe knew what Hunter was spending the money on.

What’s wrong with you,” Hunter asked the Examiner just after the above story was published.

According to a 2020 GOP Senate report, “Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern European countries,” and that certain transactions were linked to what “appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”

The report says that Hunter “sent thousands of dollars” to individuals who were either involved in “transactions consistent with possible human trafficking” or “potential association with prostitution.”

Some of Hunter’s hookers “subsequently wired funds they have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine.”

In one instance, a prostitute named Eva told Hunter that he owed a total of $9,500 for 16 hours of ‘work’ – telling him to wire the funds directly to a bank account linked to a woman with a Russian email address. Less than 90 minutes later, “Joseph R. Biden Jr.” sent him $5,000 through Cash App, after which Joe Biden’s former assistant texted Hunter to say that the amount was the maximum amount allowed because the “weekly limit is $7,500.”

Many of the previously unreported records cited in this story, including Hunter Biden’s communications with his father, were located in a password-protected iPhone XS backup found on a copy of his abandoned laptop. The iPhone was saved to Hunter Biden’s computer on Feb. 6, 2019. Konstantinos “Gus” Dimitrelos, a cyber forensics expert commissioned by the Washington Examiner, located the password to the iPhone backup during his examination of the hard drive.

In one instance, Joe Biden wired his son $5,000 less than three hours before he filmed a dispute with an escort over a $10,000 payment at a cottage in Boston, Massachusetts. -Washington Examiner

According to Hunter’s search history, he was looking for “dc Russian escorts,” and visited the UberGFE website to browse for hookers.

Screenshot

Hunter is currently under federal investigation for possible tax fraud linked to his overseas business dealings.

Speaking of which, the Daily Mail has leaked December 2018 audio of Joe Biden telling Hunter he wanted to talk to him after the New York Times dropped a story on Hunter’s dealings with Chinese oil company CEFC.

The president has repeatedly denied personally and through his press secretary that he ever talked about Hunter’s foreign business with his Hunter – despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Now, in a voicemail left on Hunter’s iPhone, the evidence has come from POTUS’ own mouth.

Joe called Hunter on December 12, 2018 saying that he wanted to talk to him after reading a New York Times story about Hunter’s dealings with the Chinese oil giant CEFC. -Daily Mail

Files on Hunter’s laptop reveal that he leveraged his family name to strike a deal with CEFC for millions of dollars.

According to the Times story, CEFC chairman Ye Jianming was arrested in China, while his #2 Patrick Ho had been convicted in the US for bribing African officials in order to help Iran evade oil sanctions.

Ye met with Hunter in 2017 in a Miami hotel to discuss “a partnership to invest in American infrastructure and energy deals.”

According to the leaked Audio, Joe says in a voicemail to Hunter; “Hey pal, it’s Dad. It’s 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk to you,” adding “I thought the article released online, it’s going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good. I think you’re clear. And anyway if you get a chance give me a call, I love you.”

And of course, none of this is apparently newsworthy according to the same networks that provided 24-7 coverage of the Trump children’s nothingburger “gotchas.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/29/2022 – 04:22

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/g6lBV0z Tyler Durden