Pentagon Agency Wants Arms Monitors On Ground In Ukraine To Track Billions In Hardware Shipped

Pentagon Agency Wants Arms Monitors On Ground In Ukraine To Track Billions In Hardware Shipped

Much belatedly now that there’s a seemingly endless US weapons pipeline going into Ukraine, the Pentagon is worried they might end of in the “wrong hands” and is seeking to take steps to do something about it. It now wants to track serial numbers of US weaponry on the ground as the fight for Ukraine continues.

As early as April US officials began admitting that once advanced systems like Javelin anti-tank weapons cross into Ukraine they have no idea where they go from there. There’s speculation that some percentage of Western-supplied arms will be resold on the black market, or even make there way to other conflicts outside Ukraine, such as in the Middle East. 

Image source: AFP/Getty

“We have fidelity for a short time, but when it enters the fog of war, we have almost zero,” one intelligence source told CNN in a prior report. “It drops into a big black hole, and you have almost no sense of it at all after a short period of time.”

But on Thursday, the Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) issued a statement urging US military leaders to send weapons inspectors into war-torn Ukraine in order to directly monitor the literal billions of dollars in arms being handed out.

This would go beyond the current set-up of the Pentagon simply taking Ukrainian officials’ “word for it” when it comes to proper distribution and usage of weapons and ammo against the Russian invading forces. After all, there have been signs the Department of Defense is tapping into America’s own vital stockpiles in order to supply the Ukrainians.

An analyst with the military commentary site Defense One describes that currently, “All U.S. officials can do now is review receipts of the arms transfers from other locations in Europe and take Ukrainian officials’ word that the weapons are being properly used and stored.”

But DSCA deputy director Jed Royal has stated, “Over time, we would like to be able to extend our insights with greater presence on the ground.”

Royal added that in a scenario inspectors are sent in, it would not be “some kind of operational detachment or anything along those lines.” But that’s not how Moscow would see it, after vowing to target any inbound foreign weapons shipments in locates it identifies in the conflict theater. The Pentagon official said further:

“What I’m talking about is a security cooperation office, appropriately the right size given the mission set for Ukraine, that would fall under chief of mission authority like we have in other countries,” he said.

The Pentagon’s “end-use monitoring” mission typically involves inspectors physically reviewing weapons and checking serial numbers. That is “just harder to do that without a robust presence on the ground,” Royal said.

Without one, “we are somewhat limited in our ability to get the kind of insight that we would like to have.”

But according to a recent report in The New York Times, the CIA has had a significant ground presence since the start of the Russian invasion and even prior.

Yet it goes without saying that Pentagon foreign weapons transfer programs have some degree of actual oversight, being much more in public view and officially disclosed, whereas the CIA operates in the shadows – often with its activities not being detailed till years later (the covert “Timber Sycamore” program in Syria is a prime example).

Thus the CIA has less incentive to provide oversight and accountability when it comes to US covert arms programs – and often even actively fights to prevent such oversight.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 11:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/0eMA3HG Tyler Durden

Blain: “Markets Are Still In Denial/Fool-Themselves Mode”

Blain: “Markets Are Still In Denial/Fool-Themselves Mode”

Authored by Bill Blain via MorningPorridge.com,

“Cheer up my lads ‘tis to glory we steer, to add something new to this wonderful year…”

Stocks tumbled 20% in H1, but Central Banks are fixated on Inflation as the No 1 priority with higher interest rates nailed on. Supply chain issues remain difficult, meaning corporate earnings will remain under pressure. The market is setting up for further weakness through H2.

It’s the last day of June, the end of the 2nd Quarter of this inglorious year, and the headlines sum up the mood: Banks are warning of recession, Tesla is laying off staff from its Autodrive division (really? I thought that was what justified it’s 100 times P/E?), petrol prices at the pump are putting on a new high. Or how about Morgan Stanley warning the price of Carnival Cruise could tumble to zero if recession triggers a major demand shock.. High probability then…

Will things get any better in the second half of the year?

Probably not.

Jay Powel said it all: The process is highly likely to involve some pain, but the worst pain would be from failing to address this high inflation and allowing it to become persistent” Inflation is Central Banks number one concern – not addressing the market declines we’ve seen in the first half. We’re expecting a series of large hikes in interest rates through the summer – even the ECB!

Yet, Markets are still in denial/fool-themselves mode. Markets tend to accentuate the positive and, in doing so remain largely unaware of reality. But at some point reality and inflated hopes tend to collide. Usually painfully.

I’m guessing, but I have a gut-feeling the coming July earnings season could be the straw that triggers the next leg down. The results news-flow will be subtle, and its unlikely to be a succession of disastrous results – just a stream of not-quite-as-good-as-expected numbers. Cumulatively, the news trend will confirm companies are struggling more than anticipated with the consequences of high staffing costs and low availability, high inventories and the need to discount, falling demand on the back of the inflation shock, and ongoing supply chain issues.

Listen very closely to what CEO’s are really saying, and strip out what they want you to hear. Get past the corporate blandishments and it could reverse years of blithe expectations. It’s going to highlight just how badly the real world is still misfiring. (There is a developing sub-text to the corporate outlook – the increasing untenability of highly levered Zombies.. the first, like Revlon have already stumbled.)

Think back to the Pandemic. When it began in March 2020 the stock market took a massive dip. And then it went steadily higher and higher – fuelled by expectations of swift recovery once Covid was beaten. Positive news – like vaccine tests, airports reopening or falling infections were each greeted by rallies. Traders and professional investors talked about how the wall of pandemic savings would create a post-pandemic boom.

The real question to ponder is… why were markets so wrong? Now we look headed for recession. It’s not just the Ukraine energy and food inflation stocks. Much of it boils down to still broken global supply chains.

One of the surprising things I’ve learnt over nearly 40 years about the business of finance is how little investment bankers actually know about the real world. They experience little real “friction” in the business of moving assets around an electronic balance sheet, or calculating returns on a laptop. This morning I have experienced friction because my Laptop had a hissy fit. I was about to punch it before our IT guy bravely stepped in….

In the real world there is tremendous friction in every single part of all transactions – loading a ship, putting cargo on a plane, getting goods shifted from A to B, waiting for parts, waiting for payments, dealing with customers, building products and selling them. It’s difficult. Yet, friction played little part in the markets analysis of the pandemic. Analysts straight out of Investment Management school have diddly-squat idea about the real world.

Even now I don’t think the “market” understands the real economy. It’s still poised for a buying opportunity – looking for signals the bottom has passed and it’s time to buy. I read loads of research about why markets may go up, and look at pages of overweight recommendations and just a few lines of underweight. The market remains highly biased to the upside.

That’s the real divergence in the economy – what the market thinks is happening, and what actual people on the ground actually see… Let me digress for a moment and try to explain the divergence:

For the first 20 years of my inglorious career in finance I spent 99% of my time speaking to fellow finance professionals – traders, salesmen, economists all pushing whatever the investment banking line was. I then relayed these perspectives to my clients in the debt capital markets; Bank Treasurers, CEOs, Investment Firm Economists and Strategists, Portfolio Managers and funding bosses. I existed in a groupthink bubble comprising entirely financial market participants. I thought, acted and behaved like a financial professional clone.

It took me years to realise just how conditioned I had become.

I was lucky. Writing the Morning Porridge since 2007 – and being a natural cynic – has helped. I was lucky to retain just enough disbelief to realise how fundamentally broken financial markets were by the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. My blinkers over investment banking were lifted after the bank I’d led from zero to top 3 in the Financial Institutions business sacked me for “not fitting in.” I perceived just how distorted markets became as a result of regulation, monetary experimentation and QE.

I broke out the bubble. As financial markets became more and more distorted, I started to look for opportunities in real assets rather than financial assets. It’s been fascinating.

Since 2009 I’ve been fortunate to spend an increasing amount of my time talking to real people with real jobs in the real economy. I chat to real entrepreneurs and businesses looking for finance and meeting a whole range of executives, engineers, marketing managers, retail leaders, designers and guys who actually make stuff. A brush with illness brought me to Earth, meeting doctors able to explain not only why I wasn’t working, but the issues with heath provision. Talking to real nurses, brickies, chippies, and artisans has been extraordinary.

I now find it’s difficult to take all finance professionals seriously. It’s been a learning curve about friction.

Pandemic reality slows and there still aren’t enough ships, lorry drivers, pilots, baggage handlers… As shortages bite, inflation rises, we get further exogenous shocks, and a cost-of-living crisis develops. Firms suddenly find themselves with over-ambitious inventories, and suddenly there is talk of companies dumping stock, meaning they miss margins. As interest rates soar to address inflation, zombie companies that leveraged themselves up to buy back their own stock suddenly find themselves busting. (There just is not enough worry about how the junk sector is likely to fare.)

And supply chains are not fixed.

Speak to real economy professionals and they will tell you rising labour costs, rising energy costs, rising logistical costs, rising transport costs, ongoing shortages of key parts, longer lead times for parts, ongoing supply disruptions, rising inventory levels, rising tariffs and barriers to trade, increasing red-tape, geopolitical uncertainty, right down to their simply not being enough space to store components in what was once a just-in-time based factory… and it’s all a recipe for a broken economy.

Compare and contrast to what the market expected and believed would happen – a frictionless reopening of the post-pandemic economy, and what we actually have: ongoing supply chain disruption and friction. All it takes is a few missing containers, a delayed ship (because it slowed down because fuel costs soared), or a container pork blocked because there aren’t enough lorry drivers. One pebble quickly becomes a landslide.

Real businesses are addressing it – they are solving problems ranging from storage space, using smart data, communications, planning and new supply chain approaches. If a particular chip is unavailable and irreplaceable, they find a work around – even it means delaying deliveries. Its tough. They know it may take years because it’s not just supply chains that are changing – its terms of trade, trade routes and costs. Markets assume it will just happen – probably tomorrow or the day after. No it won’t.

And ongoing supply chain crisis is just one aspect of what markets aren’t grasping in terms of the economic reality out there… The inflation shocks from Energy, Food and now Wages. These are real and long-term. They were never transitory.

One of the aspects of the coming Carnival Lines dunking will be its coming liquidity crisis on the back of rising interest rates and crashing customer demand. Morgan Stanley point out it has $30 bln of debt and “unsustainably” high leverage. As its’ stock prices continues on a downwards spire, then raising new equity will be dilutive and costly. You can bet its not the only firm in trouble!

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 11:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/N5HxKIu Tyler Durden

“One Of The Worst Downturns In Recent History”: Zuck Warns Facebook Employees To Brace For Layoffs

“One Of The Worst Downturns In Recent History”: Zuck Warns Facebook Employees To Brace For Layoffs

One month ago we showed that while the BLS still revels in its seasonally-adjusted statistical nonsense to divine the monthly level of payrolls, the real world is seeing a wave of mass layoff the likes of which have not been seen since the covid crash

Fast forward to today when it appears that we are about to hit the motherlode of mass layoffs, after none other than Zuck sounded the alarm bell.

According to Reuters, Facebook-owner Meta Platforms has cut plans to hire engineers by at least 30% this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees on Thursday, as he warned them to brace for a deep economic downturn.

“If I had to bet, I’d say that this might be one of the worst downturns that we’ve seen in recent history,” Zuckerberg told workers in a weekly employee Q&A session, audio of which was heard by Reuters.

And while Zuck emphasized the lack of hiring – noting that it has reduced its target for hiring engineers in 2022 to around 6,000-7,000, down from an initial plan to hire about 10,000 new engineers, which comes amid a hiring paused announced month – he confirmed that layoffs are also coming saying the company was “turning up the heat” on performance management to weed out staffers unable to meet more aggressive goals.

“Realistically, there are probably a bunch of people at the company who shouldn’t be here,” Zuckerberg said, adding that “part of my hope by raising expectations and having more aggressive goals, and just kind of turning up the heat a little bit, is that I think some of you might decide that this place isn’t for you, and that self-selection is OK with me.

Others made the message even more forcefully, with Chief Product Officer Chris Cox saying that the company must “prioritize more ruthlessly” and “operate leaner, meaner, better executing teams.”

“I have to underscore that we are in serious times here and the headwinds are fierce. We need to execute flawlessly in an environment of slower growth, where teams should not expect vast influxes of new engineers and budgets,” Cox wrote.

Translation: when even the most profitable tech companies are braching for mass layoffs, the bottom is about to fall out… or as Biden would say:

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 10:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/sx864RJ Tyler Durden

Toronto Police Cause Confusion With Post About Missing “Woman” With A Goatee

Toronto Police Cause Confusion With Post About Missing “Woman” With A Goatee

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Toronto Police caused confusion on Twitter after posting about a missing ‘woman’ despite the accompanying picture showing a biological male with a goatee.

“News Release – Missing Woman, Ryerson Avenue and Bathurst Street area, Isobella Degrace, 27,” stated the Twitter post.

“She is described as 5’10″, with a thin build, shaggy blonde hair, and a full goatee,” the Toronto Police Service said.

“She was last seen wearing a black t-shirt and grey pants.”

Apparently, observing Canada’s gender identification rules is more important than accurately describing a missing person.

Respondents on Twitter were quick to chime in.

“How are we supposed to find her when you post a picture of a dude?” asked another respondent.

“How would you describe this woman on the radio or via text?” asked another.

“If you laugh, it’s a hate crime,” joked one person.

Despite the stupidity, Isobella Degrace was eventually located by authorities about 9 hours after posting the tweet.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 10:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/FX2p7bv Tyler Durden

Bond Yields Are Puking…

Bond Yields Are Puking…

The 5Y Treasury yield is down 25bps this morning.

Read that again… 25bps!

The entire Treasury curve is re-rating lower as recession risks soar (Manufacturing surveys look ugly this morning)…

And market expectations for Fed hikes are tumbling while subsequent rate-cut expectations are rising…

Mr. Powell, you have a problem!

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 10:11

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/mF0MzNy Tyler Durden

US Manufacturing Slumps In May, New Orders & Jobs Contract

US Manufacturing Slumps In May, New Orders & Jobs Contract

Analysts expected Manufacturing PMI to be flat from its ugly preliminary print of 52.4 and saw ISM Manufacturing dropping to 54.5 from 56.1 – both still comfortably in expansion (above 50) despite the collapse in US macro data relative to expectations.

BUT… things improved intra-month for Manufacturing PMI – rising to 52.7 final from 52.4 preliminary – but still notably below April’s 57.0 print.

ISM Manufacturing was worse, falling to 53.0 from 56.1 (below the 54.5 expectations).

Source: Bloomberg

The headline PMI dropped to its lowest level since July 2020 amid a near-stagnation of factory output and a fall in new orders. The decrease in sales was the first since May 2020, with domestic and foreign client demand falling.

The ISM print is the weakest since June 2020 and under the hood is more worrisome with an outright contraction in new orders and employment…

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said:

The PMI survey has fallen in June to a level indicative of the manufacturing sector acting as a drag on GDP, with that drag set to intensify as we move through the summer. Forward-looking indicators such as business expectations, new order inflows, backlogs of work and purchasing of inputs have all deteriorated markedly to suggest an increased risk of an industrial downturn.

Demand growth is cooling from households amid the cost-of-living crisis, and capital spending by companies is also showing signs of moderating due to tightening financial conditions and the gloomier outlook. However, most marked has been a steep drop in orders for inputs by manufacturers, which hints at an inventory correction.

“Some welcome news is that the drop in demand for inputs has brought some pressure off supply chains and calmed prices for a wide variety of goods, which should help alleviate broader inflationary pressures in coming months.”

So, even though the manufacturing surveys are still above the 50 Maginot Line, the steep declines sync positively with the rising recession fears and soaring rate-cut expectations being priced into the markets…

Will Powell jawbone that expectation away, or embrace it as policy?

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 10:04

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/MuVgkEJ Tyler Durden

SCOTUS Said Ambitious Climate Regulations Need To Come From Congress. Lawmakers Are Furious.


Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren

A Supreme Court decision not going your way isn’t the end of the world. Or is it? On Thursday, six out of nine U.S. Supreme Court justices issued an opinion in the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) saying that the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA sweeping unilateral power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

Instead, such a sweeping program would have to be explicitly authorized by Congress, said Chief Justice John Roberts in a majority opinion.

The history of the case, as Reason‘s Ron Bailey sketches out here, is long and complicated. It stretches back to 2015, when the Obama administration’s EPA issued its Clean Power Plan, which would establish cap-and-trade markets for greenhouse gas emissions in each state. The regulations would have phased out coal-generated power plants over time.

The Clean Power Plan proved immediately controversial. The Supreme Court paused its implementation in 2016. Former President Donald Trump tried to replace it with more limited rules during his tenure—a move that was also shot down by the courts.

The Biden administration attempted to revive the Clean Power Plan. The court’s decision yesterday puts an end to that effort.

Writing in The Washington Post, conservative commentator George Will argues the decision was a win for separation of powers that might put some outer bounds on executive authority and encourage Congress to resume its role of actually legislating.

“If, as is desirable, the decision presages similar ones, they could, cumulatively, revive Congress by compelling it to resume its proper responsibilities,” writes Will. “This would limit the excessive autonomy currently enjoyed by the executive agencies that are the increasingly autonomous, unleashed and unaccountable administrative state.”

Lawmakers themselves who supported the Clean Power Plan have taken a somewhat dimmer view of the decision.

The commentariat was no less restrained.

Writing over at MSNBC’s ReidOut Blog one day before the decision, Ja’han Jones suggests that a loss in the West Virginia case would end not just the Clean Power Plan but “will likely threaten the very concept of a federal government.” (Don’t threaten me with a good time.)

The reaction, much like the planet, is overheated. Congress always retained the power to regulate carbon emissions as it sees fit. It’s a power Roberts even encourages it to use.

“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day,'” wrote Roberts. “But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in [the Clean Air Act]. A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself.

The decision turns everything back over to the democratically elected branches of government to decide. It’s that decision that capital-D Democrats are so incensed by.


FREE MINDS

Four people are suing Washington, D.C., and its police chief over the city’s ban on carrying firearms on public buses and trains. The lawsuit, filed by three D.C. residents and one Virginia resident, argues that the restriction isn’t justified by the country’s history or any significant government regulation.

DCist has the story:

“There is not a tradition or history of prohibitions of carrying firearms on public transportation vehicles,” reads the lawsuit, which was filed by George Lyon, a D.C.-based lawyer with Arsenal Attorneys who has filed multiple lawsuits in the past over the city’s restrictive gun laws. “Public transportation systems did not exist as they do today at the founding of the nation. However, there was plainly a tradition of firearms carry when citizens traveled from their homes. In modern parlance, Americans carried arms to prevent their gatherings from becoming soft targets.”


FREE MARKETS

Denver, Colorado, is implementing an affordable housing program today that will likely make housing less affordable over time. Starting today, developers in the Mile High City will have to offer between 8 and 15 percent of the homes they build in developments of 10 or more units at below-market rates or otherwise pay into an affordable housing fund.

In exchange for taking a haircut on those units, developers would be rewarded with reduced fees and minimum parking requirements.

These kinds of “inclusionary zoning” ordinances are common across the United States. Nearly 1,000 jurisdictions have adopted some of form of them.

Research has shown that they raise overall housing costs, as developers try to recuperate the cost of the mandated affordable units by raising rents on the market-rate ones. Portland, Oregon, and Portland, Maine’s inclusionary zoning ordinances are so strict that builders have largely stopped constructing regulated projects. Pittsburgh is being sued over its inclusionary zoning ordinance, with plaintiffs arguing it’s an unconstitutional taking.

The percentage of affordable units Denver requires, and the discounted rates they’ll have to be rented/sold at, is more generous to developers than what some cities have on the books. Denver’s mandate also comes with offsetting incentives that should make construction cheaper. On the other hand, its new ordinance applies to smaller projects than is typical.

Those details will determine how destructive Denver’s policy is for housing affordability and supply. That it will have some negative impact is almost certain.


QUICK HITS

• India is the latest country to crack down on single-use plastics.

• The nation’s professional fact-checkers have deemed Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ true statement that COVID-19 vaccines “were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children” as false. Thomas made that statement in an opinion criticizing the court for taking up a case involving religious exemptions to a New York vaccine mandate.

• The ultra-hot electric vehicle market has spawned a market of Tesla flippers, reports the Los Angeles Times.

• The latest Personal Consumption Expenditures data, an alternative measure of inflation preferred by the Federal Reserve, continue to show rising inflation.

• The U.S. Department of Transportation and its fearless leader, Pete Buttigieg, are launching a new Momentum initiative. The stated purpose is to spread the word to other countries about America’s decidedly mediocre transportation system. The implicit message is that it’s foreigners (not the Biden administration) that are responsible for supply chain hiccups. Regardless of one’s political affiliation, everyone should agree the announcement video is cringe.

• San Francisco voters will have an opportunity to approve a “vacant home” tax as an effort to address the city’s crushing housing affordability problems. The results of similar policies in other cities suggest it’s not going to do much good.

The post SCOTUS Said Ambitious Climate Regulations Need To Come From Congress. Lawmakers Are Furious. appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/WtyU325
via IFTTT

Erdogan Warns Sweden, Finland NATO Bids Could Still Be Blocked If Vows Not Kept

Erdogan Warns Sweden, Finland NATO Bids Could Still Be Blocked If Vows Not Kept

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Thursday that Sweden and Finland could still have their NATO bids blocked by Turkey if the Nordic nations don’t follow a memorandum that was signed earlier in the week.

Turkey lifted its objection to Sweden and Finland joining NATO after the three countries signed a 10-point agreement on Tuesday. Under the deal, the Nordic nations agreed to respond to Turkey’s extradition requests, lift export controls on Turkey, and not support Kurdish militant groups, including the PKK.

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, Finland’s President Sauli Niinisto, Sweden’s Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at Madrid summit on Tuesday, via Reuters.

Erdogan said that if the deal isn’t followed, Turkey’s parliament could block their membership. “This business will not work if we don’t pass this in our parliament,” Erdogan said at the final day of the NATO summit in Madrid.

“First Sweden and Finland must fulfill their duties and those are already in the text… But if they don’t fulfill these, then of course there is no way we would send it to our parliament,” he warned.

What appears to be the most important issue for Erdogan is that Finland and Sweden agree to extradite suspected PKK members. He claimed Sweden agreed to extradite 73 people, although a leaked version of the memorandum did not say that. 

Sweden promised to give us these 73 people with this text. They may or they may not, we will follow that through the text and we will make our decision,” the Turkish leader said.

Concerning extradition, the memorandum said that Sweden and Finland agreed to address Turkey’s “pending deportation or extradition requests expeditiously and thoroughly.” The Nordic nations also agreed to “establish necessary bilateral legal frameworks to facilitate extradition and security cooperation with Turkey.”

The Swedish government could come under intense domestic pressure over the deal with Turkey. The ruling Social Democrats recently survived a no-confidence vote that relied on the support of an independent MP of Kurdish heritage, Amineh Kakabaveh, who said the government agreed not to give in to Turkey’s demands for NATO membership.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 09:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/G2KIwH3 Tyler Durden

SCOTUS Said Ambitious Climate Regulations Need To Come From Congress. Lawmakers Are Furious.


Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren

A Supreme Court decision not going your way isn’t the end of the world. Or is it? On Thursday, six out of nine U.S. Supreme Court justices issued an opinion in the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) saying that the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA sweeping unilateral power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

Instead, such a sweeping program would have to be explicitly authorized by Congress, said Chief Justice John Roberts in a majority opinion.

The history of the case, as Reason‘s Ron Bailey sketches out here, is long and complicated. It stretches back to 2015, when the Obama administration’s EPA issued its Clean Power Plan, which would establish cap-and-trade markets for greenhouse gas emissions in each state. The regulations would have phased out coal-generated power plants over time.

The Clean Power Plan proved immediately controversial. The Supreme Court paused its implementation in 2016. Former President Donald Trump tried to replace it with more limited rules during his tenure—a move that was also shot down by the courts.

The Biden administration attempted to revive the Clean Power Plan. The court’s decision yesterday puts an end to that effort.

Writing in The Washington Post, conservative commentator George Will argues the decision was a win for separation of powers that might put some outer bounds on executive authority and encourage Congress to resume its role of actually legislating.

“If, as is desirable, the decision presages similar ones, they could, cumulatively, revive Congress by compelling it to resume its proper responsibilities,” writes Will. “This would limit the excessive autonomy currently enjoyed by the executive agencies that are the increasingly autonomous, unleashed and unaccountable administrative state.”

Lawmakers themselves who supported the Clean Power Plan have taken a somewhat dimmer view of the decision.

The commentariat was no less restrained.

Writing over at MSNBC’s ReidOut Blog one day before the decision, Ja’han Jones suggests that a loss in the West Virginia case would end not just the Clean Power Plan but “will likely threaten the very concept of a federal government.” (Don’t threaten me with a good time.)

The reaction, much like the planet, is overheated. Congress always retained the power to regulate carbon emissions as it sees fit. It’s a power Roberts even encourages it to use.

“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day,'” wrote Roberts. “But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in [the Clean Air Act]. A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself.

The decision turns everything back over to the democratically elected branches of government to decide. It’s that decision that capital-D Democrats are so incensed by.


FREE MINDS

Four people are suing Washington, D.C., and its police chief over the city’s ban on carrying firearms on public buses and trains. The lawsuit, filed by three D.C. residents and one Virginia resident, argues that the restriction isn’t justified by the country’s history or any significant government regulation.

DCist has the story:

“There is not a tradition or history of prohibitions of carrying firearms on public transportation vehicles,” reads the lawsuit, which was filed by George Lyon, a D.C.-based lawyer with Arsenal Attorneys who has filed multiple lawsuits in the past over the city’s restrictive gun laws. “Public transportation systems did not exist as they do today at the founding of the nation. However, there was plainly a tradition of firearms carry when citizens traveled from their homes. In modern parlance, Americans carried arms to prevent their gatherings from becoming soft targets.”


FREE MARKETS

Denver, Colorado, is implementing an affordable housing program today that will likely make housing less affordable over time. Starting today, developers in the Mile High City will have to offer between 8 and 15 percent of the homes they build in developments of 10 or more units at below-market rates or otherwise pay into an affordable housing fund.

In exchange for taking a haircut on those units, developers would be rewarded with reduced fees and minimum parking requirements.

These kinds of “inclusionary zoning” ordinances are common across the United States. Nearly 1,000 jurisdictions have adopted some of form of them.

Research has shown that they raise overall housing costs, as developers try to recuperate the cost of the mandated affordable units by raising rents on the market-rate ones. Portland, Oregon, and Portland, Maine’s inclusionary zoning ordinances are so strict that builders have largely stopped constructing regulated projects. Pittsburgh is being sued over its inclusionary zoning ordinance, with plaintiffs arguing it’s an unconstitutional taking.

The percentage of affordable units Denver requires, and the discounted rates they’ll have to be rented/sold at, is more generous to developers than what some cities have on the books. Denver’s mandate also comes with offsetting incentives that should make construction cheaper. On the other hand, its new ordinance applies to smaller projects than is typical.

Those details will determine how destructive Denver’s policy is for housing affordability and supply. That it will have some negative impact is almost certain.


QUICK HITS

• India is the latest country to crack down on single-use plastics.

• The nation’s professional fact-checkers have deemed Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ true statement that COVID-19 vaccines “were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children” as false. Thomas made that statement in an opinion criticizing the court for taking up a case involving religious exemptions to a New York vaccine mandate.

• The ultra-hot electric vehicle market has spawned a market of Tesla flippers, reports the Los Angeles Times.

• The latest Personal Consumption Expenditures data, an alternative measure of inflation preferred by the Federal Reserve, continue to show rising inflation.

• The U.S. Department of Transportation and its fearless leader, Pete Buttigieg, are launching a new Momentum initiative. The stated purpose is to spread the word to other countries about America’s decidedly mediocre transportation system. The implicit message is that it’s foreigners (not the Biden administration) that are responsible for supply chain hiccups. Regardless of one’s political affiliation, everyone should agree the announcement video is cringe.

• San Francisco voters will have an opportunity to approve a “vacant home” tax as an effort to address the city’s crushing housing affordability problems. The results of similar policies in other cities suggest it’s not going to do much good.

The post SCOTUS Said Ambitious Climate Regulations Need To Come From Congress. Lawmakers Are Furious. appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/WtyU325
via IFTTT

Nomura Now Forecasts Global Recession As Its Base Case

Nomura Now Forecasts Global Recession As Its Base Case

Less than two weeks after Nomura became the first bank to one-up Deutsche Bank’s “US recession” base case, by forecasting a contraction in the US economy in late 2022 (unlike DB’s 2023 prediction), coupled with a sharp Fed pivot and rate cuts all the way back to zero…

… on Friday morning the Japanese bank broke new ground, when its economists published a new “anchor report” (available to professional subs) in which in addition to the US, they now expect recessions in the euro area, UK, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Canada. Here are some excerpts from the 39-page report:

  • Several mid-sized economies, including Australia, Canada and South Korea, have had debt-fueled housing booms and are at risk of deeper-than-forecast recessions if interest rate hikes trigger housing busts and deleveraging.
  • The odd one out is China, which is recovering from recession as the economy unlocks amid accommodative policies, though it is at risk of renewed lockdowns and another recession, so long as Beijing sticks to its zero-Covid strategy.
  • Despite weakening growth, we expect high inflation to persist for some time. Led by the Fed, we expect central banks to err on the side of tightening too much than tightening too little, in order to regain their inflation-fighting credibility.
  • Amid recessions and once it is clear that inflation is abating towards target, we now expect a number of central banks to cut rates in 2023.

And some more context:

The word recession is bandied around in the media, but it is a nebulous concept. Technically, two consecutive quarters of real GDP contracting by just 0.1% q-o-q meets the definition of recession, but recessions can be much deeper and longer lasting; for example, US real GDP contracted by a cumulative 4% over four consecutive quarters during 2008-09, and by 10.1% in H1 2020. Economists have a poor track record in forecasting recessions. Perhaps it is human nature and because recessions are nasty outcomes that the consensus of economists tend to only forecast when they are plainly obvious. For example, it is striking that not one of the 18 participants at the June FOMC projected an outright decline in US real GDP. Insofar as economic slowdowns reach a tipping point, where amplifier effects kick-in, lurching the economy into contraction is another reason why recessions often surprise.

Recessions in many major economies

Cognizant of the above and considering our US team on 19 June significantly downgraded their growth outlook to forecast a US recession starting in Q4 2022, we have decided to bite the bullet on a more global scale. Because of tightening monetary and fiscal policies, rising cost of living pressures from high commodity prices and tightening financial conditions, we now forecast a number of other major economies – euro area, UK, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Canada – to tip into recession within the next 12 months (Figure 1).

Increasing signs that the world economy is entering a synchronized growth slowdown, meaning countries can no longer rely on a rebound in exports for growth, have also prompted us to forecast multiple recessions. The extent of recession vary from country to country. In the US, we expect a shallow but long recession, lasting five quarters, as strong household balance sheets should limit the depth of the recession but, unlike recent decades, we expect no policy support, with the Fed hiking rates into the recession as it focuses on its now single mandate of getting inflation back under control.

In Europe, despite our new baseline of a recession, similar in magnitude to the US, the risk is firmly skewed towards a much deeper recession, in a scenario where Russia completely cuts off gas to Europe.

In Japan, our forecast is for the mildest of technical recessions, as the economy faces some offsetting tailwinds from the delayed reopening and as it is one of the few with continued policy support. In addition to high inflation, South Korea, Australia and Canada have had debt-fueled housing booms and are at risk of deeper-than-forecast recessions, if interest rate hikes trigger housing busts and deleveraging.

The odd one out is China, which is recovering from recession as the economy unlocks amid accommodative policies, though it is at risk of renewed lockdowns and another recession, so long as Beijing sticks to its zero-Covid strategy. In stark contrast to China, the level of real GDP in Q4 2023 is lower than in Q1 2022 for the US, euro area, UK, South Korea and Canada

Incidentally, it’s not just  Nomura that is forecasting rate cuts in 2023: as of this moment, the Eurodollar market itself is pricing in half a rate cut in Q1.

There is much more in the full report available to professional subs but the gist is clear: pain is coming, as is a historic pivot by the Fed, probably some time around Jackson Hole, which will send risk assets soaring so far it will make heads spin…

Tyler Durden
Fri, 07/01/2022 – 09:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xMKto31 Tyler Durden