Why This Recession Is Different Than All The Rest

Why This Recession Is Different Than All The Rest

Authored by Peter Reagan via Birch Gold Group

No matter how you look at it, most Americans saving for retirement are feeling incredible pressure on their entire financial situation right now.

But before we dive into just how dire the economic situation is in the U.S., on the global level things aren’t “peachy” either. In fact, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is predicting a massive global slowdown:

The IMF now expects the world economy to grow 3.2% in 2022 before slowing to a 2.9% GDP rate in 2023 — marking a downgrade of 0.4 and 0.7 percentage points, respectively, from April. The Washington-based institute said the revised outlook indicated that the downside risks outlined in its earlier report were now materializing. Those include soaring global inflation, China’s slowdown and the war in Ukraine.

But while the global GDP outlook isn’t so hot, the Biden economy could also be heading for serious trouble over the next few months.

To illustrate how fast things can change from one day to the next, on the 25th the chances of entering a recession were only “fair” according to CNBC and Janet Yellen:

The economy stands at least a fair chance of hitting the rule-of-thumb recession definition of two consecutive quarters with negative GDP readings. Should inflation stay at high levels, that then will trigger the biggest recession catalyst of all, namely Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said “we just don’t have” conditions consistent with a recession.

But only a few days later, and following her “faux pas” about inflation, Yellen was shown to be wrong once again. The U.S. economy did contract according to official GDP numbers released only a few days later, on the 28th.

This means that short of some miracle that isn’t likely to happen, a “widely accepted” economic recession is already upon us:

The U.S. economy contracted for the second straight quarter from April to June, hitting a widely accepted rule of thumb for a recession, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday.

You can see the two-quarter slowdown in GDP reflected below on the bar graph from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA):

Source

Note this chart shows the change from the previous quarter – so two consecutive quarters of negative growth are compounding.

The BEA statement on the second quarter slowdown revealed another disturbing fact that could be a signal of even more economic malaise to come:

Real GDP decreased less in the second quarter than in the first quarter, decreasing 0.9 percent after decreasing 1.6 percent. The smaller decrease reflected an upturn in exports and a smaller decrease in federal government spending that were partly offset by larger declines in private inventory investment and state and local government spending, a slowdown in PCE, and downturns in nonresidential fixed investment and residential fixed investment. Imports decelerated.

This appears to reveal that U.S. exports “saved the day.” But even those gains were offset by various declines and slowdowns. That isn’t a good look, especially if exports were to decline in 3Q2022.

The next official BEA release is August 25, 2022. Assuming there are no major changes between now and then, the “cement” will have dried on this recession’s start.

Unfortunately, red-hot 9.1% inflation looks to be one of the causes of a slowing economy (people spending more carefully). That also just happens to be one of the Fed’s mandates.

Their idea of a solution is to raise funding rates to bring inflation under control.

Necessary Fed rate hikes aggravate the economic damage

So while the Fed attempts to “mop up the mess” that they created, the potential for further economic slowdown from their rate increases could send the U.S. into a deeper recession than it already is.

According to an article by Wolf Richter, the Federal Reserve just decided to increase rates another 75 basis points (.75%). It also doesn’t look like Chairman Powell wants to slow this hawkish behavior anytime soon:

To make sure everyone got it, he said several times that “another unusually large increase could be appropriate at the next meeting,” depending on the inflation data… Out the window went the notion of a “pause” in September that had been ridiculously hyped by some tightening-deniers a couple of months ago.

And Powell said that “we wouldn’t hesitate” to go even higher – so a 100-basis point hike maybe – if inflation data comes in hot.”

So in addition to the most recent rate hike, Powell finally appears to be putting the brakes on “cheap money for Wall Street.”

Any retirement saver who is thinking “It’s about time!” isn’t alone. In fact, a recent NPR piece put the situation as plainly as ever:

“The economy hangs in the balance.”

So does your retirement nest egg, if you aren’t prepared.

Protecting your savings from a different kind of recession

We can take an educated guess that international diversification won’t help much if we enter a global downturn. We don’t know how long or how deep that downturn will be.

We do know the Fed really messed up, so it’s critical that they clean up their mess. There’s no turning back from that now. A Fed clean-up on the economy aisle, in this case, means slowing the economy. Raising interest rates. Discouraging economic activity. That’s bad for businesses and investors who depend on cheap loans and easy-money policies. The Fed is also cleaning up their mess very slowly, and ongoing interest rate hikes are too small to tame inflation quickly, but still enough to keep punishing bonds.

Maybe it’s time to consider diversifying your savings with assets whose value doesn’t depend on the whims of unelected bureaucrats?

With these thoughts in mind, it’s a good idea to consider safe havens for your hard-earned savings. Traditional inflation-resistant investments including TIPS, Series I bonds, and physical precious metals like gold and silver are excellent ones to consider.

A few minutes spent right now on learning how to preserve your retirement savings could save your financial future from the Fed’s mess.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 09:44

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SQzw4gf Tyler Durden

Ahead Of Today’s $2.1 Trillion OpEx, Here’s Why Futures Are Sharply Lower

Ahead Of Today’s $2.1 Trillion OpEx, Here’s Why Futures Are Sharply Lower

As reported earlier, the week is closing on a very downbeat note, with futures sharply lower – ES down as much as -95bps / NQ -110bps – as focus shifts to the aftermath of this latest meme stock bubble bursting (BBBY -40%), $2T in options rolling off and the back up in yields following hawkish commentary from Central Bank speakers Bullard (calling for 75bps) and George (case for raising rates remains strong).

In Europe, ECB’s Schnabel said the inflation outlook has failed to improve and even if they enter a recession, its unlikely inflationary pressures will abate by themselves, meanwhile the latest PPI print was an absolute shocker, courtesy of the neverending surge in energy prices. Also, as we noted previously, volumes yesterday were the lowest of the year, and outside of expiry, today will not be much different.

What’s behind today’s weakness? Below is a list courtesy of Goldman trader Michael Nocerino (full note available to pro subs)

  • Retail Meme Stocks Unraveling – BBBY -40%…Imagine shorts will be coming out of the woodwork – keep an eye on Goldman’s PB data for confirmation.
  • Crypto following suit – XBT -7%
  • German PPI Came in at Record Highs 5.3% rise
  • DXY Strong following suit – EURUSD testing parity…
  • Bullard called for 75bps in September – yet mkt still pricing in 50/50 short of a 75bps hike in Sept.
  • Yields Higher following suit – 10y at 2.97…
  • Large Expiry – $2T in options rolling off – “4300 Magnet In Effect”: Previewing Tomorrow’s $2 Trillion Op-Ex

EURUSD Continues to Test 2002 Levels…

Speaking of today’s monster expiration, here it is by the numbers:

Here’s what our GS options strategists (h/t Rocky Fishman) had broken down as when/what options expire (data ran earlier this week, but gives you a sense) =>

At the 930am SQ settlement:

  • $770bn of SPX AM options will expire
  • $65bn of non-SPX index will expire (e.g. NDX, RTY, SOX Index, etc)
    • Total of $835bn expires at the open

on the 4pm closing settlement:

  • $205bn of options on E-minis
  • $185bn of SPY options
  • $205bn of SPX PM options
  • $220bn of non-SPY ETF options
  • $430bn of single stock options
    • Total of $1.245tn expires on the close

Here is Nocerino’s list of key factors to focus on:

  • VOLUMES….Second worst of the year, but if you take out the volume in BBBY, it was the worst of the year. 9.5B shares traded yday vs. ytd avg of 12.23B.
  • NOTIONALS…Total traded across all exchanges yesterday was lowest ytd ($380B vs. ytd avg of $612B)
  • RUSSIA/CHINA/US…Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin will attend the G20 summit in Bali in November, raising the prospect of a meeting with Joe Biden at a time of heightened tensions between the world’s military superpowers over Taiwan and Ukraine. FT
  • GS DESK FLOWS…We saw HF shorting in macro products and passive L/O demand in energy and tech.

Goldman Prime Broker Update (08/18)

  • Overall book modestly net bought (1-Yr Zscore +0.3) ahead of large option expiry today, driven by a 2nd day of risk-on flows with long buys > short sales 2.4 to 1
  • Single Stocks and Macro Products both modestly net bought and made up 56%/44% of the $ net buying, driven by long buys and short covers, respectively.
  • 7 of 11 sectors were net bought led in $ terms by Info Tech, Financials, Real Estate, and Industrials; Comm Svcs, Energy, Health Care, and Consumer Disc were the most $ net sold
  • After 15 straight days of covering, Consumer Disc shorts increased +0.3% yday (still down -12% MoM) driven by Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure names

Month-end Pension rebal update

Still unch’d as we continue to trade in a range…As of yday’s close, Goldman’s model estimates $11bn of US equities to SELL for month-end. Reminder we saw one trigger event occur on Aug 11th in which $13bn of US equities were sold. This brings total estimated rebalancing for Aug to $24bn of EQ to be sold. Quick stats on the remaining $11bn to be sold — $11bn to SELL ranks in the 39th %ile in absolute dollar value over the past 3yrs and in the 65th %ile going back to Jan 2000. $11bn to SELL ranks in the 50th %ile on a net basis (-$70bn to +$150bn scale) over the past 3yrs and in the 21st %ile going back to Jan 2000 (small relative to history).

More in the full note available to pro subs.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 09:24

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/vCjzZLS Tyler Durden

Democrats Attempt To Boost Midterm Fortunes by Pitching Inflation Reduction Bill That Won’t Reduce Inflation


President Joe Biden signs Inflation Reduction Act

This week, President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)—a massive legislative package of climate spending, health care subsidies and price controls, and corporate tax increases—into law.

Now Democrats intend to sell it to the public in hopes of salvaging their midterm election fortunes. As Politico reports, a consortium of outside groups aligned with the Democratic Party is planning to spend $10 million advertising the law in “a 90-day sprint to promote the package and defy a brutal electoral environment for the party.” Democratic electeds are planning to make the case directly to constituents, too.

But despite upbeat headlines showering Biden and his fellow Democrats with praise for their accomplishments, there’s little reason to think that the particulars of the legislation will make much difference at the polls this November, because it won’t live up to the promises it makes.

The best way to understand the IRA is as a repackaged, rebranded version of the “Build Back Better” spending plans that Democrats spent much of 2021 and early 2022 trying to pass. The IRA is smaller than any of the various Build Back Better bills that Democrats tried to push through Congress, but the mix of issues and priorities is essentially the same: It’s a climate spending bill attached to Obamacare subsidies and prescription drug price controls along with an awkward tax reform that amounts to a corporate tax hike.

What’s different this time around, besides the smaller size of the bill, is the branding.

Instead of the Democrat’s ambitious social spending agenda, the bill has been repackaged as a more modest inflation reducer. It’s not hard to understand the reason for the rebrand: Polling has found that inflation is the number one concern for voters, and Biden has pledged to make fighting it his top priority.

But the IRA pursues that goal in name only. As the Manhattan Institute’s Chris Pope recently argued, although “rising inflation has forced Democratic leaders to scale back their ambitions significantly, the various provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act remain largely unaltered from a time when inflation was the least of their concerns.” Outside the title, in other words, this bill doesn’t have a whole lot to do with inflation.

Indeed, multiple nonpartisan analyses project that the bill will do nothing to mitigate inflation in the short term—and in the near future, it might even make inflation worse. An analysis from the Penn Wharton Budget Model found the IRA will “have no meaningful effect on inflation in the near term but would reduce inflation by around 0.1 percentage points by the middle of the first decade.” Similarly, economists for J.P. Morgan recently wrote that “despite the name, [the IRA] may not have a measurable impact on reducing inflation, which is being driven higher by energy and food prices, rents, and consumer goods and services spending.”

The public isn’t convinced either. Just 24 percent believe the law will actually reduce inflation, according to a recent Morning Consult poll. Democrats haven’t even convinced a majority of their own voters: The same poll found that fewer than half of Democrats—just 48 percent—think it will improve the country’s inflation situation.

With Biden’s approval rating hovering around the 40 percent mark and large majorities saying the country is on the wrong track, it’s easy to see why Democrats are worried about the coming midterm elections.

The best reason to think that Democrats will have a fighting chance in November is that polls have recently found that congressional Democrats performed slightly better than Republicans on a generic ballot (i.e., one without specific candidates). But that improvement began before the IRA was signed into law.

Since Biden stepped into the Oval Office last year, Democrats have struggled to translate their agenda into voter approval. As GOP-aligned pollster Kristen Soltis Anderson recently wrote in her newsletter, Codebook, “President Biden has signed into law a lot of major bills during the last two years, a handful of which received bipartisan support and enabled him to maximize what he could achieve in a world where Democrats do not have 60 votes in the Senate. However, voters have not given Biden and Democrats a lasting or notable political bump following passage of any of them.” Democrats can point to headlines about all the legislation they’ve passed and all the policies they’ve enacted, but it doesn’t matter if people don’t like those policies. And to the extent that the public has already experienced the effects of the Democratic policy agenda, they haven’t particularly liked it.

Soltis Anderson doesn’t completely rule out the possibility that this time will be different. But, she argues, voters will have to see a practical, positive difference in their own lives and attribute it specifically to Democratic governance.

One can never predict the results of elections with much confidence this many months out, and, given that inflation for the single month of July was effectively zero (even though inflation rose 8.5 percent over the previous 12 months), inflation may mellow somewhat on its own.

But if Americans need to feel and credit Democratic policies for improving their lives, and their number one priority is inflation, that may turn out to be a problem given the way Democrats have branded and sold their latest big-ticket legislation: How many voters do they expect to win over with an inflation reduction bill that is quite unlikely to reduce inflation?


FREE MINDS

A federal judge has put a stop to part of Florida’s Stop WOKE Act. The law, backed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, aims to prohibit classroom discussions and corporate education that makes people feel discomfort about their race.

The judge said the employer portions of the law plainly violate First Amendment speech protections: “The challenged provision of the Act is a naked viewpoint-based regulation on speech that does not pass strict scrutiny,” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida Chief Judge Mark Walker writes in the ruling.

Later in the ruling, Walker writes: “Florida’s Legislators may well find Plaintiffs’ speech ‘repugnant.’ But under our constitutional scheme, the ‘remedy’ for repugnant speech ‘is more speech, not enforced silence.'”

The ruling also begins with an extended reference to the Netflix sci-fi series Stranger Things:

In the popular television series Stranger Things, the “upside down” describes a parallel dimension containing a distorted version of our world. See Stranger Things (Netflix 2022). Recently, Florida has seemed like a First Amendment upside down. Normally, the First Amendment bars the state from burdening speech, while private actors may burden speech freely. But in Florida, the First Amendment apparently bars private actors from burdening speech, while the state may burden speech freely.


FREE MARKETS

Speaking of Netflix: More people are now watching streaming services than cable TV, The Wall Street Journal reports:

Americans spent more of their July TV-viewing time streaming content on services such as Netflix, YouTube and HBO Max than they did watching cable television, according to Nielsen data, marking the first month that streaming has overtaken cable.

Nobody knows what television is anymore!


QUICK HITS

• Prosecutors say Salman Rushdie’s attacker was motivated by the belief that Rushdie disrespected Islam.

• A former executive with former President Donald Trump’s company admitted in court that “that he had conspired with the former president’s company to commit numerous crimes,” reports The New York Times.

• After a hearing, a federal judge indicated that he might unseal some part of the affidavit related to the FBI search of Trump’s Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago.

• The Biden administration is planning to deliver monkeypox vaccines to localities that plan to vaccinate people with one-fifth the previously recommended dose, in an effort to stretch vaccine supplies.

• Hackers are jailbreaking John Deere tractors.

• Inflation is so high that retirees are coming back into the work force in order to afford basic goods.

• She-Hulk, the new Disney+ sitcom-esque series based on a Marvel Comics superhero, is garnering pretty good reviews.

The post Democrats Attempt To Boost Midterm Fortunes by Pitching Inflation Reduction Bill That Won't Reduce Inflation appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/BJFkCjU
via IFTTT

Democrats Attempt To Boost Midterm Fortunes by Pitching Inflation Reduction Bill That Won’t Reduce Inflation


President Joe Biden signs Inflation Reduction Act

This week, President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)—a massive legislative package of climate spending, health care subsidies and price controls, and corporate tax increases—into law.

Now Democrats intend to sell it to the public in hopes of salvaging their midterm election fortunes. As Politico reports, a consortium of outside groups aligned with the Democratic Party is planning to spend $10 million advertising the law in “a 90-day sprint to promote the package and defy a brutal electoral environment for the party.” Democratic electeds are planning to make the case directly to constituents, too.

But despite upbeat headlines showering Biden and his fellow Democrats with praise for their accomplishments, there’s little reason to think that the particulars of the legislation will make much difference at the polls this November, because it won’t live up to the promises it makes.

The best way to understand the IRA is as a repackaged, rebranded version of the “Build Back Better” spending plans that Democrats spent much of 2021 and early 2022 trying to pass. The IRA is smaller than any of the various Build Back Better bills that Democrats tried to push through Congress, but the mix of issues and priorities is essentially the same: It’s a climate spending bill attached to Obamacare subsidies and prescription drug price controls along with an awkward tax reform that amounts to a corporate tax hike.

What’s different this time around, besides the smaller size of the bill, is the branding.

Instead of the Democrat’s ambitious social spending agenda, the bill has been repackaged as a more modest inflation reducer. It’s not hard to understand the reason for the rebrand: Polling has found that inflation is the number one concern for voters, and Biden has pledged to make fighting it his top priority.

But the IRA pursues that goal in name only. As the Manhattan Institute’s Chris Pope recently argued, although “rising inflation has forced Democratic leaders to scale back their ambitions significantly, the various provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act remain largely unaltered from a time when inflation was the least of their concerns.” Outside the title, in other words, this bill doesn’t have a whole lot to do with inflation.

Indeed, multiple nonpartisan analyses project that the bill will do nothing to mitigate inflation in the short term—and in the near future, it might even make inflation worse. An analysis from the Penn Wharton Budget Model found the IRA will “have no meaningful effect on inflation in the near term but would reduce inflation by around 0.1 percentage points by the middle of the first decade.” Similarly, economists for J.P. Morgan recently wrote that “despite the name, [the IRA] may not have a measurable impact on reducing inflation, which is being driven higher by energy and food prices, rents, and consumer goods and services spending.”

The public isn’t convinced either. Just 24 percent believe the law will actually reduce inflation, according to a recent Morning Consult poll. Democrats haven’t even convinced a majority of their own voters: The same poll found that fewer than half of Democrats—just 48 percent—think it will improve the country’s inflation situation.

With Biden’s approval rating hovering around the 40 percent mark and large majorities saying the country is on the wrong track, it’s easy to see why Democrats are worried about the coming midterm elections.

The best reason to think that Democrats will have a fighting chance in November is that polls have recently found that congressional Democrats performed slightly better than Republicans on a generic ballot (i.e., one without specific candidates). But that improvement began before the IRA was signed into law.

Since Biden stepped into the Oval Office last year, Democrats have struggled to translate their agenda into voter approval. As GOP-aligned pollster Kristen Soltis Anderson recently wrote in her newsletter, Codebook, “President Biden has signed into law a lot of major bills during the last two years, a handful of which received bipartisan support and enabled him to maximize what he could achieve in a world where Democrats do not have 60 votes in the Senate. However, voters have not given Biden and Democrats a lasting or notable political bump following passage of any of them.” Democrats can point to headlines about all the legislation they’ve passed and all the policies they’ve enacted, but it doesn’t matter if people don’t like those policies. And to the extent that the public has already experienced the effects of the Democratic policy agenda, they haven’t particularly liked it.

Soltis Anderson doesn’t completely rule out the possibility that this time will be different. But, she argues, voters will have to see a practical, positive difference in their own lives and attribute it specifically to Democratic governance.

One can never predict the results of elections with much confidence this many months out, and, given that inflation for the single month of July was effectively zero (even though inflation rose 8.5 percent over the previous 12 months), inflation may mellow somewhat on its own.

But if Americans need to feel and credit Democratic policies for improving their lives, and their number one priority is inflation, that may turn out to be a problem given the way Democrats have branded and sold their latest big-ticket legislation: How many voters do they expect to win over with an inflation reduction bill that is quite unlikely to reduce inflation?


FREE MINDS

A federal judge has put a stop to part of Florida’s Stop WOKE Act. The law, backed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, aims to prohibit classroom discussions and corporate education that makes people feel discomfort about their race.

The judge said the employer portions of the law plainly violate First Amendment speech protections: “The challenged provision of the Act is a naked viewpoint-based regulation on speech that does not pass strict scrutiny,” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida Chief Judge Mark Walker writes in the ruling.

Later in the ruling, Walker writes: “Florida’s Legislators may well find Plaintiffs’ speech ‘repugnant.’ But under our constitutional scheme, the ‘remedy’ for repugnant speech ‘is more speech, not enforced silence.'”

The ruling also begins with an extended reference to the Netflix sci-fi series Stranger Things:

In the popular television series Stranger Things, the “upside down” describes a parallel dimension containing a distorted version of our world. See Stranger Things (Netflix 2022). Recently, Florida has seemed like a First Amendment upside down. Normally, the First Amendment bars the state from burdening speech, while private actors may burden speech freely. But in Florida, the First Amendment apparently bars private actors from burdening speech, while the state may burden speech freely.


FREE MARKETS

Speaking of Netflix: More people are now watching streaming services than cable TV, The Wall Street Journal reports:

Americans spent more of their July TV-viewing time streaming content on services such as Netflix, YouTube and HBO Max than they did watching cable television, according to Nielsen data, marking the first month that streaming has overtaken cable.

Nobody knows what television is anymore!


QUICK HITS

• Prosecutors say Salman Rushdie’s attacker was motivated by the belief that Rushdie disrespected Islam.

• A former executive with former President Donald Trump’s company admitted in court that “that he had conspired with the former president’s company to commit numerous crimes,” reports The New York Times.

• After a hearing, a federal judge indicated that he might unseal some part of the affidavit related to the FBI search of Trump’s Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago.

• The Biden administration is planning to deliver monkeypox vaccines to localities that plan to vaccinate people with one-fifth the previously recommended dose, in an effort to stretch vaccine supplies.

• Hackers are jailbreaking John Deere tractors.

• Inflation is so high that retirees are coming back into the work force in order to afford basic goods.

• She-Hulk, the new Disney+ sitcom-esque series based on a Marvel Comics superhero, is garnering pretty good reviews.

The post Democrats Attempt To Boost Midterm Fortunes by Pitching Inflation Reduction Bill That Won't Reduce Inflation appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/BJFkCjU
via IFTTT

Wayfair Is Laying Off About 5% Of Its Workforce

Wayfair Is Laying Off About 5% Of Its Workforce

More layoffs are here, even in the face of the latest super-duper jobs number that we swear doesn’t include people taking on their 2nd or 3rd jobs just to make ends meet and catch up with inflation. 

Wayfair has just become the latest in a long line of companies to pare back its workforce, announcing this morning that it was going to cutting its labor by about 5%. 

In a Form 8-K filed on Friday morning, the online retailer discussed the layoffs, amidst other cost cutting measures. Wayfair “announced a workforce reduction involving approximately 870 employees in connection with its previously announced plans to manage operating expenses and realign investment priorities.”

The filing continued: “This reduction represents approximately 5% of our global workforce and approximately 10% of our corporate team. Concurrently, the Company is in the process of making substantial reductions in its third party labor costs.

The company said it was going to take “between approximately $30 million and $40 million of costs” in Q3 2022 as a result of the layoffs. 

These layoffs come a year after reports that Amazon was planning with a premium service that lets customers opt to have furniture or appliances assembled as soon they arrive at their homes.

Recall, we wrote a piece just days ago helping our readers visualize all of the latest major layoffs at U.S. corporations. We noted that in June 2022, Insight Global found that 78% of American workers fear they will lose their job in the next recession. Additionally, 56% said they aren’t financially prepared, and 54% said they would take a pay cut to avoid being laid off.

In this infographic, Visual Capitalist’s Marcus Lu visualizes major layoffs announced in 2022 by publicly-traded U.S. corporations.

Note: Due to gaps in reporting, as well as the very large number of U.S. corporations, this list may not be comprehensive.

An Emerging Trend

Layoffs have surged considerably since April of this year. See the table below for high-profile instances of mass layoffs.

Layoffs are expected to continue throughout the rest of this year, as metrics like consumer sentiment enter a decline. Rising interest rates, which make it more expensive for businesses to borrow money, are also having a negative impact on growth.

In fact just a few days ago, trading platform Robinhood announced it was letting go 23% of its staff. After accounting for its previous layoffs in April (9% of the workforce), it’s fair to estimate that this latest round will impact nearly 800 people.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 09:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3CKzbT6 Tyler Durden

Nomura Warns “Apocalyptic” German PPI Triggers “Unclench” From “Gamma Gravity” Into OpEx

Nomura Warns “Apocalyptic” German PPI Triggers “Unclench” From “Gamma Gravity” Into OpEx

US futures are down hard overnight, erasing all the week’s gains, following a stunning German PPI print overnight. Nomura’s Charlie McElligott described the 5.7% MoM surge (and 37.2% YoY) as “apocalyptic”…

…as the energy crisis impact sparks full-blown economic carnage domestically…

, and knocks-into global Central Bank hike expectations, Rates, FX and Vol.

With Euro now being devalued daily due to the energy crisis on fwd growth being doomed—and all into a priced “impulse tightening” ahead in coming months from a “behind the curve ECB” who can do nothing about “supply” and only “demand” (big “ooof”), the spill-over is a global financial conditions surge “tighter / more restrictive,” as the US Dollar “wrecking ball” is again screaming higher—and that’s a negative for global risk-assets

Like I have been messaging over the past few weeks, the near-consensus “buy-in” to the “past peak inflation” story is at risk of being caught flat-footed by ongoing “fits and starts” of structural “supply-side” inflation issues which cannot be solved by CB policy, despite the comfort which has been provided locally by the recent roll-over in Commodities / Goods, as well as forward “survey” data

Simply-put, inflation is not going to roll-over in a smooth, linear-fashion…and likely stays “sticky higher” above target, keeping CB’s in the uncomfortable “restrictive for longer” territory required

And bigger-picture, this is another reminder that even a seemingly idiosyncratic or isolated situation (UK inflation Wednesday, today’s German PPI) can elicit a “butterfly effect” impact: flapping its wings locally, but risk causing a chaotic “tornado” outcome elsewhere, in a future state

As the Nomura strategist notes, this horrific escalation of the EU / UK energy disaster in recent days as a knock-on “Vol catalyst” potential elsewhere, and how critical this could be with the concurrent timing of the Equities Op-Ex “window for Vol expansion,” as we see a large amount of $Gamma set to drop-off today, which then allows for resumption of broader distribution of price-outcomes thereafter…

But, as McElligott notes, for a larger market “price shock,” this needs to occur against the “right” conditions – so not just getting that required macro “Vol catalyst(s),” but against market-structure conditions which can allow for movement – which is where today’s Op-Ex can come into play.

SPX “Gamma Gravity” now the key at holding this market near the whopping 4250 strike line ($3.51B total $Gamma there, $1.47B front-expiry) into the a.m. expiration, because this line is in-particular is loaded with front-week Options set to expire—which, in-turn, means a “Gamma Unclenching” thereafter which can open us to a wider distribution of outcomes / broader range of prices, as the prior Dealer hedging barriers are suddenly diminished by nearly half

42% of the 4250 line’s $Gamma set to drop-off today, and similarly lumpy amounts from overhead strikes, which can then “expose” a lower-end to the range if broken

Obviously, losing the prior “barrier” which has pinned / supported the market this week can be a “big deal” now that we have a macro / rate vol / central bank policy “butterfly flapping its wings” catalyst which is reminding us that we are not out of the woods at all yet, as it relates to structural inflation “supply-side” issues trying to be solved-for by “demand” levers

IF we were to convincingly break through 4250 to the downside….technicals become more important then to see a further and sustained move lower:

  • Walter Burke sees today’s weakness in ES as breaking below the bottom of the mid-July bull channel and latest breakout level at 4202

  • 4200 has about $2.1B of $Gamma after today’s expiration as a support below

  • But it’s the “Gamma Flip” level down at 4174 which should mark the real risk of acceleration LOWER, as that is the location we see Dealer Gamma pivoting “Short,” which means that instead of their hedging flows acting as a counter-cyclical buffer…that they can then instead begin to feed into the move LOWER, have to sell more futures the lower we go, in order to stay hedged against Puts they’re Short to clients

Simply put: Negative Gamma regimes allow for Vol Expansion and unstable movement—so a flip “Short Gamma vs Spot” territory would be our first real downside acceleration risk seen since mid-June.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 08:47

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/NxzdrID Tyler Durden

GM Resumes Dividend, Hikes Buyback Authorization To $5 Billion

GM Resumes Dividend, Hikes Buyback Authorization To $5 Billion

General Motors has announced this morning that, after more than 2 years, the company is re-instating its dividend and share buybacks. 

A company press release said on Friday morning that the company’s Board of Directors “has authorized the reinstatement of a quarterly cash dividend on the company’s outstanding common stock at a rate of $0.09 per share.”

It continues: “The first dividend will be paid on Sept. 15, 2022, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on Aug. 31, 2022.”

Regarding stock purchases, the company said that its Board “increased the capacity under the company’s existing repurchase program to $5.0 billion of common stock, up from the $3.3 billion previously remaining under the program.”

CEO Mary Barra commented: “GM is investing more than $35 billion through 2025 to advance our growth plan, including rapidly expanding our electric vehicle portfolio and creating a domestic battery manufacturing infrastructure.”

She continued: “Progress on these key strategic initiatives has improved our visibility and strengthened confidence in our capacity to fund growth while also returning capital to shareholders.”

Paul Jacobson, GM chief financial officer, commented: “GM’s consistently strong earnings, margins and cash flow, our investment-grade balance sheet, and the achievement of several significant milestones in our growth strategy enables us to invest aggressively to accelerate our all-electric future while also supporting the return of excess free cash flow to shareholders, aligned with our long-term capital allocation strategy.”

The company PR then went on to talk about some of its recent operating milestones, which include:

  • The largest single investment announcement in the company’s history: more than $7 billion in four Michigan manufacturing sites, including a new Ultium Cells LLC plant in Lansing, that will create 4,000 new jobs and retain 1,000

  • The launches of the GMC HUMMER EV Pickup and Cadillac LYRIQ, the first vehicles developed on GM’s Ultium Platform

  • Significant customer demand for the GMC HUMMER EV Pickup and SUV, the Cadillac LYRIQ and the Chevrolet Silverado EV

  • The first customer deliveries for the BrightDrop Zevo 600 electric delivery vehicle, with volume commitments from leading companies including FedEx, Walmart, Verizon and Merchants Fleet

  • The Ultium Cells plant in Warren, Ohio is ready to come on-line this month; significant construction progress has been made at the Ultium Cells plants in Spring Hill, Tennessee, and Lansing, Michigan, which open in 2023 and 2024, respectively

  • Combined, these Ultium Cells plants are expected to create 6,000 construction jobs and 5,100 operations jobs when they are at full capacity, and the location of a fourth U.S. cell manufacturing plant will be announced soon

  • The successful execution of binding agreements to secure all the battery raw material GM requires to scale EV production to more than 1 million units of annual capacity in North America by 2025

  • The historic launch of a fully driverless commercial ride share service in San Francisco by Cruise, GM’s majority-owned subsidiary

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 08:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/cTb0V72 Tyler Durden

Jackson Hole: More Things To Worry About

Jackson Hole: More Things To Worry About

By Simon White, Bloomberg Markets Live reporter and commentator

Anticipation that Powell’s Jackson Hole keynote will showcase his inflation-fighting resolve should depress equities in coming days. However, it’s hard to envision how he can successfully cause rates to reprice, and the speech will likely fall short of expectations.

It’s an article of faith among most analysts that inflation is too high and that it requires a significant tightening in financial conditions to bring it back to target. Furthermore, the 2023 Fed dots are 51bps higher than Jan. 24 implied Fed fund futures.

With equities still in a relatively buoyant frame of mind Powell seems to have a free shot at establishing his hawkish credentials.

There’s a good chance the Fed chief will craft a speech that signals that he is focused almost solely on inflation, the risk of the wage-price spiral, and the costs of inflation expectations getting out of hand (as Bloomberg economist Yelena Shulyatyeva has suggested). He should try to convince markets that these risks far exceed the costs of bumpy landing.

However:

  • What more can he say that hasn’t already been said? In the last press conference, Powell implied that the headline inflation measure was unusually important because of its role in potentially de-anchoring inflation expectations. He also said “nothing works in the economy without price stability” and “we don’t see it (the fight against inflation) as a trade-off with the employment mandate”. This language would need to be significantly sharpened or strong research findings would need to be produced to illustrate that the trade-off should be put on hold for there to be an impact on the longer-dated Fed expectations

  • Will markets be able to believe that the Fed will go on hiking once a sizable number of people are put out of work, and the noise of the mid-term elections is behind us?

  • There are precedents for the Fed dots sharply being disconnected from market pricing, and for the markets being right. For instance, the market was pricing 1.75% for Jan-2020 fed funds on June 13, 2017, versus the median dot released on June 14 which had Fed funds at 2.9% at end 2019, and the gap widened into September. It turned out that the market was right: effective fed funds ended 2019 at 1.55%

Granted, he could choose to focus on the need for tighter financial conditions or choose to flag a short-term front-loading of hikes at a faster pace than the market expects.

While both are reasonable for equity markets to worry about, there are reasons to be skeptical that either course of action will be taken.

Simpler than trying to deal with expectations further out would be to flag an imminent front-loading of hikes at a faster pace than the market expects:

  • Presumably, the very strong labor market and high headline inflation can be used as justification. Powell could easily communicate with the board ahead of time to get buy-in, and Bernanke probably did in 2012 to flag September QE3.

  • However, this is not the norm for Jackson Hole, which tends to deal with issues at a longer-time horizon.

  • Furthermore, it’s not short-term pricing that’s the problem. The Jan-23 Fed Fund Futures are already 11bps north of the dots.

Another method would be talk about the need to tighten financial conditions in the short term, which would imply that longer-term rates are too low, and that the Fed would not respond to equity weakness:

  • However, in Powell’s most recent press conference and the minutes, all references to financial conditions indicate that the Fed is happy with the tightening so far, and there doesn’t seem to be recognition that these conditions are too loose.

  • Indeed, the line on page 10 of the minutes which describes “a notable tightening of financial conditions” is quite typical of how they are described on all 9 occasions. That is, Fed might want conditions to tighten over time, but there seems no urgency in recent communications.

* * *

One final point here, from ZH, is that contrary to the Fed’s view that financial conditions have tightened “notably”, just the opposite has in fact occurred because as Goldman showed recently, the 20+ day period since the July FOMC has seen one of the biggest easings of financial conditions (driven by the surge in markets) on record.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 08:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/MldDYL9 Tyler Durden

“Saudi Doctoral Student Gets 34 Years in Prison For Tweets”

The AP reports:

A Saudi court has sentenced a doctoral student to 34 years in prison for spreading “[allegedly false] rumors” and retweeting dissidents, according to court documents obtained Thursday, a decision that has drawn growing global condemnation.

Activists and lawyers consider the sentence against Salma al-Shehab, a mother of two and a researcher at Leeds University in Britain, shocking even by Saudi standards of justice….

Al-Shehab was detained during a family vacation in January 2021 just days before she planned to return to the United Kingdom ….

Judges accused al-Shehab of “disturbing public order” and “destabilizing the social fabric” — claims stemming solely from her social media activity, according to an official charge sheet….

The post "Saudi Doctoral Student Gets 34 Years in Prison For Tweets" appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/6c3YyGI
via IFTTT

The Increasingly Dangerous Variants of the “Most-Favored-Nation” Theory of Religious Liberty, Part V: The Abuse of Strict Scrutiny

I will conclude this series of posts by considering the variants of MFN that affect the way strict scrutiny is applied. MFN-6, ubiquitous in the Covid cases, makes strict scrutiny impossible to satisfy, by treating as equivalents regulated actions that are radically different in their effects on the pertinent state interests. MFN-7, proposed by Alito in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and possibly embraced by the Court in Fulton v. Philadelphia, sweeps away the state interest more summarily, by declaring that however urgent it may be, it cannot possibly be compelling if the state has allowed exceptions to it.

Tandon says that “whether two activities are comparable for purposes of the Free Exercise Clause must be judged against the asserted government interest that justifies the regulation at issue.” This judgment is distorted if the Court systematically misperceives the comparative burden on government interests, minimizing the damage to the pertinent interest when a religious exemption is sought. This of course distorts what Tandon contemplates, by deeming similar two activities that are not similar in their effect on the asserted government interest—as Justice Kagan put it, requiring “that the State equally treat apples and watermelons.”

This move, which we will call MFN-6, has been ubiquitous in the Covid cases. In response to church capacity limits during Covid lockdowns, it became the position of a majority of the Court as soon as Barrett replaced Ginsburg. With respect to vaccines, where religious exemptions could create a public health disaster, it only commands three votes so far.

MFN-6 is a mutated version of MFN-2, and is often a consequence of its application. One may understand it as a complication of a preexisting pathology. MFN-2 misconstrues the coverage of a statute, in order to find exceptions where there are none. MFN-6 similarly misconstrues the statutory scheme, here failing to perceive the sought exemption’s damage to the government interest. They have in common a failure to understand what government is doing and why it is doing it.

There are too many Covid cases to discuss them all here, though I go into considerably more detail in my forthcoming paper. Tandon v. Newsom is an example. It enjoined California’s Covid-19 order limiting more than three households from gathering in homes. The Court declared the order could not be applied to religious groups that want to hold services in a home. It explained that “government regulations are not neutral and generally applicable, and therefore trigger strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, whenever they treat any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise.” This rule, announced without full briefing or argument, was then used to enjoin a rule that did not mention religion at all and whose authors almost certainly were not even thinking about religion. The Court held that the rule discriminated against religion, because “California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise, permitting hair salons, retail stores, personal care services, movie theaters, private suites at sporting events and concerts, and indoor restaurants to bring together more than three households at a time.”

Justice Kagan, dissenting, pointed out that those activities “pose lesser risks” because they can enforce mask wearing, the interactions are briefer, and ventilation is better. That points to another innovation: persistent imprecision in deciding what counts as comparable activity.

The most dangerous manifestation of MFN-6 is Justice Gorsuch’s dissents in Does v. Mills and Dr. A. v. Hochul, two cases in which a divided Court declined to block state requirements that health care workers be vaccinated against the coronavirus notwithstanding their religious objections. (I already discussed these cases when considering MFN-2, which triggered strict scrutiny. MFN-6 affects how that scrutiny is applied.) Three justices thought that, because the state exempted those whose health would be endangered by them, it must also allow religious exemptions.

An apparently permanent feature of the human condition is the existence of deadly, contagious diseases—smallpox, polio, measles, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, rotavirus, and others. Except for smallpox, which has been eradicated, these diseases still kill many people outside the United States. One of the great innovations of modern science is the creation of vaccines that can prevent them.

Much of Gorsuch’s argument involves the abuse of MFN-2, the variant he developed in Masterpiece Cakeshop: misconstruing the law’s purposes in order to conjure up unfairness. Maine “allows those invoking medical reasons to avoid the vaccine mandate on the apparent premise that these individuals can take alter­native measures (such as the use of protective gear and reg­ular testing) to safeguard their patients and co-workers. But the State refuses to allow those invoking religious rea­sons to do the very same thing.”

Why would a state allow medical but not religious exemptions? The medical part is easy. The state’s real aim is, not maximizing vaccinations, but preventing disease and death. That would not be served by forcing vaccines on those who would be endangered by them. The state interest is compelling and its rule is narrowly tailored.

When Does was decided, it was clear that religious exemptions would prolong the pandemic. Only 57% of the adult population was fully vaccinated. Vaccine resistance had become a marker of Republican political identity. Because it is hard to contradict someone’s assertion that her objection is sincere, religious objections were easily abused.  A quarter of the workforce of the Los Angeles Police Department had claimed them, and 40 percent of the city’s police were still not vaccinated.

Religious exemptions, but not medical exemptions, have been linked to significant outbreaks of disease. Those with medical exemptions do not cluster geographically. Religious claimants do. Vaccine resistance tends to concentrate in communities of like-minded people. A worker with a religious exemption is far more dangerous to patients than one with a medical exemption.

Gorsuch’s logic has nothing specifically to do with Covid. It necessarily implies that there is already no compelling interest in refusing religious (while allowing medical) exemptions for any other vaccine: measles, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, and all the other nasty diseases that you got jabs for when you were a child. Most Americans don’t remember (but may soon learn) the fear that your child will die of measles or diphtheria, or be paralyzed by polio.

An even more radical variant holds that a pattern of exceptions signifies that the interest at issue cannot be compelling. The religious claimant would inevitably win, whatever the consequences. Call this MFN-7.

Justice Alito most fully develops this variant—and offers it as a manifestation of judicial modesty!—in his concurrence in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania:

If we were required to exercise our own judgment on the question whether the Government has an obligation to provide free contraceptives to all women, we would have to take sides in the great national debate about whether the Government should provide free and comprehensive medical care for all. Entering that policy debate would be inconsistent with our proper role, and RFRA does not call on us to express a view on that issue. We can answer the compelling interest question simply by asking whether Congress has treated the provision of free contraceptives to all women as a compelling interest.

“‘[A] law cannot be regarded as protecting an interest “of the highest order” . . . when it leaves appreciable damage to that supposedly vital interest unprohibited.'” Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 547 (1993). . . . here, there are exceptions aplenty. The ACA—which fails to ensure that millions of women have access to free contraceptives—unmistakably shows that Congress, at least to date, has not regarded this interest as compelling.

The inference is not simply that, if there are exceptions, there must be strict scrutiny, and the government must show a compelling interest. Rather—this what makes this variant more virulent than the others – the presence of exceptions is taken to show that the interest is not compelling at all. If that is right, then it does not matter how urgent the interest is or how necessary the law is to that interest. Women’s health, their need to control their fertility, the likelihood that unintended pregnancies will produce low birth weight babies, even the likely increase in the number of abortions, all disappear from view. The Court will take that question to be foreclosed by exceptions. But a compelling interest is indispensable to a state’s case for denying religious exemptions. The state then automatically loses. The exemption will automatically be granted. If government allows any “appreciable damage” to the interest that a law promotes, if it allows an exemption for any secular reason, then there must be a religious exemption.

Whether or not Alito’s approach was adopted by the Court in Fulton, neither he nor any other member of the Court will pursue MFN-7 to the limits of its logic. They are not anarchists. Instead, I confidently predict that they will cheat, allowing the state to pursue interests that they, in their entirely unconstrained discretion, deem worthy.

The devices of MFN-1, MFN-2, MFN-3, MFN-4, and MFN-5, taken together, make it possible to find discrimination in any law at all. When combined with MFN-7 they could produce the most extreme variant of all, which we will call MFN-8: religion always wins. Religious motivation can excuse anyone from any law. No member of the Court has embraced this, and none ever will, because it really would entail anarchy. Instead, the judges will use MFN inconsistently, relying on their unstructured intuitions.

I’ve made some pretty bold claims here, summarily and without documentation. You can read the fully developed version here.

Thanks again to Eugene for giving me this forum.

The post The Increasingly Dangerous Variants of the "Most-Favored-Nation" Theory of Religious Liberty, Part V: The Abuse of Strict Scrutiny appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/ud3LaBr
via IFTTT