Germany’s Largest Refinery Slashes Output Due To Rhine’s Low Water Levels

Germany’s Largest Refinery Slashes Output Due To Rhine’s Low Water Levels

The current water levels on the Rhine River, a major inland infrastructure transit artery across Germany, are exceptionally low and have made certain parts of the river impassible by barge. Falling waters have already disrupted the flow of commodities and are exacerbating Europe’s energy-supply crunch.

The alarming lack of water is contributing to a possible oil supply shock at Germany’s largest oil-processing complex located on the banks of the Rhine, which is operated by Shell Plc. 

“Due to the low Rhine water level, we have reduced the capacity of Shell Energy and Chemicals Park Rhineland. The situation regarding supply is challenging but carefully managed,” the company said in an e-mailed statement to Reuters

Shell didn’t reveal how much output it cut at the refining facility, which makes fuels, heating oil, and petrochemicals. However, data shows that the refinery can process upwards of 17 million tons of crude oil per year, or approximately 345,000 barrels a day. 

The refinery and chemicals plant is located on the Lower Rhine and outside Cologne. It’s downstream from the highly monitored Kaub chokepoint that is at 35 centimeters (13.8 inches) — water levels below 40 centimeters (15.7 inches) indicate shippers find it uneconomical to operate barges past the point to Upper Rhine. 

Shell’s production cut underscores the severity of dropping water levels on the waterway, amplifying an energy crisis due to Europe’s sanctions on Russia. 

We outlined last month how falling water levels on the Rhine would make things worse for the largest economy in Europe. Supplies of crude products are running low across the country. Austrian oil and gas firm OMV AG warned two weeks ago that Germany saw a run on diesel and heating fuels

There is some good news. Rhine water levels are set to increase to 67 centimeters (26.4 inches) by Aug. 22, according to German government data. Also, a fleet of crude tankers carrying diesel is headed to Europe. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 06:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/pextrKy Tyler Durden

South Carolina Targets Free Speech in Its Attempt to Limit Abortion Access


Billboard against an orange background that reads, "Speech about abortion is free speech. -The First Amendment"

One challenge prohibitionists face is that not everybody supports their prohibitions. Many people under their nominal authority want access to what’s forbidden, no matter what the law says.

Aware that the procedure remains available elsewhere, South Carolina lawmakers seeking a near-complete ban on abortion propose to forbid speech about terminating pregnancies to prevent residents of the Palmetto State from learning of such services. The recently rebooted Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is reminding `them that speech that politicians don’t like is not only the best speech but is also protected by the First Amendment.

Speech about abortion is free speech–The First Amendment,” reads the advertisements placed across South Carolina in “a six-figure billboard campaign” by FIRE, which recently adopted a new name and expanded its scope beyond academia to embrace broad civil liberties advocacy.

The billboards are going up in Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, and Myrtle Beach as South Carolina lawmakers debate not just new restrictions on abortion in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, but also restrictions on informing women about how to terminate pregnancies beyond the law’s reach. Ambitious and almost certainly unconstitutional proposed legislation would prohibit “providing information to a pregnant woman, or someone seeking information on behalf of a pregnant woman, by telephone, internet, or any other mode of communication regarding self-administered abortions or the means to obtain an abortion, knowing that the information will be used, or is reasonably likely to be used, for an abortion.” Violation of the law would be a felony, punishable by up to 25 years in prison depending on the specific offense.

The proposed censorship of abortion information comes as state legislators consider tighter restrictions in the wake of Dobbs. Language now being debated would ban all abortions, except for those necessary to preserve the life and health of the mother. Even some anti-abortion lawmakers find that too restrictive and are holding out for the inclusion of exceptions for abortions in the case of rape or incest.

Whatever the final form, though, tighter restrictions on abortion are likely to send some women looking for abortion-inducing drugs, or for information on traveling out of state to end pregnancies. Preventing such end runs is the goal of the companion bill banning information “regarding self-administered abortions or the means to obtain an abortion.” The language was clearly inspired by model legislation crafted by the National Right to Life Committee as “a robust enforcement mechanism” to ensure that state-level abortion bans are effective. That model has already been dismissed by legal experts as almost certainly unconstitutional.

“In Bigelow v. Virginia (1975), the Supreme Court struck down a state law that prohibited encouraging or prompting an abortion by the sale or circulation of any publication,” First Amendment lawyer Robert Corn-Revere noted last month for Reason. “The Court held the First Amendment protects such speech. It observed that, just as Virginia lacked constitutional authority to prevent its residents from traveling to New York to obtain abortions, it could not, ‘under the guise of exercising internal police powers, bar a citizen of another State from disseminating information about an activity that is legal in that State.'”

Even as they consider a ban on speech that might help women end their pregnancies, many South Carolina lawmakers seem to understand that the project is a non-starter, destined to perish in the courts after the inevitable challenge.

“[Sen. Richard] Cash’s bill has received a lot of attention since he introduced it June 28, shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned nearly 50 years of precedent on abortion rights and left the legality for state lawmakers to decide,” reports the Post and Courier, which notes significant opposition even among pro-life lawmakers. “But it’s not expected to get any traction.”

So, if the censorship bill is not expected to pass, why is FIRE making a fuss? Well, legislators have a history of surprising people by enacting legislation that observers consider ridiculous, but which become law despite all predictions and common sense. Right now, youth shooting teams and publications are awaiting the outcome of lawsuits against the state of California over a broadly written law that bans “marketing” guns to minors but encompasses speech about policy and shooting sports.

“A gun magazine publisher, for instance—or a gun advocacy group that publishes a magazine—would likely be covered as a ‘firearm industry member,’ because it was formed to advocate for use or ownership of guns, might endorse specific products in product reviews, and might carry advertising for guns,” UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh cautioned in testimony before the legislation passed.

Holding the line now is a good policy so that somebody doesn’t have to risk a felony conviction in the future in order to wage an after-the-fact legal battle. Complacency is just a bad idea when liberty is at stake.

Plus, the debate over the censorship measure is an opportunity to remind Palmetto State residents that there are alternatives to obeying restrictive laws. Discussions of free speech about abortion can quickly turn into conversations about the content of that speech, pointing women towards out-of-state clinics and resources like Plan C, maintained by the National Women’s Health Network, which offers advice for getting mail-order abortion pills. That is, an attempt to muzzle speech becomes a means of amplifying the targeted speech to reach a wider audience.

Fundamentally, though, whatever your opinion of abortion or other controversial issues, frustrating control freaks’ efforts to muzzle the sharing of information should be something we can all get behind.

“These proposals are a chilling attempt to stifle free speech in South Carolina,” points out FIRE Legal Director Will Creeley. “Whether you agree with abortion or not is irrelevant. You have the right to talk about it.”

Interestingly, South Carolina lawmakers’ efforts to tighten abortion restrictions may falter based on the state’s own constitutional protections. On August 17, the South Carolina Supreme Court temporarily blocked enforcement of a 2021 law limiting abortions that went into effect with the Dobbs decision.

“At this preliminary stage, we are unable to determine with finality the constitutionality of the Act under our state’s constitutional prohibition against unreasonable invasions of privacy,” the court unanimously ruled.

Abortion may or may not stay legal in South Carolina, but the state’s residents are destined to a vigorous and very informative conversation about the issue, and about speech itself.

The post South Carolina Targets Free Speech in Its Attempt to Limit Abortion Access appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/gEtVBqL
via IFTTT

Zach Weissmueller: Why Bitcoin Privacy Software Restrictions Violate Free Speech Rights


Hand uses eraser to get rid of tornado cash

To bitcoin enthusiasts, the advantages of cryptocurrency are obvious: It’s a global, decentralized financial network that no government or centralized entity can control. 

But bitcoin is also incredibly transparent. That’s by design. The system relies on a public ledger—an accounting of every single transaction that is visible and trackable to all, including government authorities who want to monitor and control the use of cryptocurrency. 

Currently, U.S. law requires cryptocurrency exchanges—essentially marketplaces for buying, selling, and trading various forms of cryptocurrency—to collect personal information about the traders who use their networks. 

Those exchanges are also vulnerable to pressure from governments who might want to freeze transactions or shut down accounts. 

Not surprisingly, this has inspired workarounds to help bitcoin users maintain financial privacy. Software programs known as “mixers” scramble the ledger, blending unrelated transactions in order to help make cryptocurrency use more difficult to track. 

One of those mixers is a program known as Tornado Cash. 

Earlier this month, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that it was adding Tornado Cash to the U.S. sanctions list, thus prohibiting all transactions using the software. The Treasury Department claims Tornado Cash is the equivalent of a high-tech weapon that could be used by terrorists or foreign rivals. But others say it’s just code, a software tool no different than any other.

That’s the topic of this week’s episode of The Reason Rundown With Peter Suderman, featuring Reason Senior Producer Zach Weissmueller.

Mentioned in this podcast:

The Canadian Government Couldn’t Stop Bitcoin,” by Zach Weissmueller

Bitcoin Can Become Untraceable.,” by Zach Weissmueller and Danielle Thompson

Audio production and editing by Ian Keyser; produced by Hunt Beaty.

The post Zach Weissmueller: Why Bitcoin Privacy Software Restrictions Violate Free Speech Rights appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/rIwCg4N
via IFTTT

Across The World Coal Power Is Back

Across The World Coal Power Is Back

Authored by Chadwick Hagan via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A bucket-wheel dumping soil and sand removed from another area of the mine in Newcastle, Australia, the world’s largest coal exporting port, on Nov. 5, 2021. (Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)

In the United States, coal consumption hit an all-time high in 2013, and soon after most every Wall Street bank and liberal activist declared coal as dead.

Still, coal energy was the dominant form of energy in the United States until 2016, and this year global coal consumption is set to reach 2013’s record levels.

In February of this year, Central Appalachian coal production hit a two-year high. Now the price of coal is rising to record levels in the United States and across the world.

Sounds like a tremendous amount of activity for an industry that has been declared dead.

What gives?

First off, let’s be honest, fossil fuels still account for much of America’s energy. According to the EIA’s Monthly Energy Review: “Fossil fuels—petroleum, natural gas, and coal—accounted for 79 percent of the 97 quadrillion British thermal units (quads) of primary energy consumption in the United States during 2021. About 21 percent of U.S. primary energy consumption in 2021 came from fuel sources other than fossil fuels, such as renewables and nuclear.”

In other words, fossil fuels made up nearly 80 percent of all energy produced in America in 2021.

Carbon Emissions Curbs Take a Backseat

Earlier this month CNBC reported on the continued coal consumption and price increases happening in domestic and global markets, stating: “coal prices are soaring and global coal consumption is expected to return to record levels reached almost 10 years ago as the global energy supply crunch continues. While investors in coal stocks are having a field day thanks to high coal prices, curbs on carbon emissions are taking a backseat as markets and governments scramble to stock up on traditional energy supply amid bottlenecks caused by the Ukraine war.”

At the moment there are a number of issues at play, ranging from the need to ramp up domestic supply for domestic energy security, to a years-long slowdown in domestic and international production, and now lingering supply issues from the Russian-Ukrainian war.

The ripple effect is being felt worldwide. International coal prices are also skyrocketing.

Mining and metals expert Pete O’Connor from Australian investment bank Shaw & Partners recently commented on the tight coal market and price increases seen across the globe, stating: “And supply [of coal] is tight. Why? Because nobody’s building capacity and markets will remain tight given the weather and Covid. So that market will stay higher for longer, probably well into the 2023 calendar year.”

Alliant Energy’s coal plant in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, on the shore of Lake Michigan, on July 4, 2022. (Timothy Gardner/Reuters)

Additionally, the IAE reported in a recent coal market report: “After coal and power shortages led to high coal prices in October 2021, the Chinese government gave orders to boost domestic production, which reduced the need for imports. In the first six months of 2022, China’s coal production increased by 11%. At the same time, we estimate that its coal demand declined by 3%. As a result, coal imports fell by 18% year-on-year to 115 Mt. For the full year, we expect China’s coal imports to decline by 18%, or 45 Mt. India also started 2022 with reduced imports, but government measures to prevent coal shortages will likely increase import volumes in the second half. Overall, we expect India’s coal imports to increase slightly compared with 2021.”

IAE continued: “Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of thermal coal, is also the most flexible. In 2021, it increased its exports by 27 Mt to 434 Mt, exporting more than twice as much as Australia (199 Mt). The United States, a swing supplier in the Atlantic market, increased exports by 12 Mt to 36 Mt.”

That’s right. U.S. coal exports increased by three times.

Costliest Coal Contract

Perhaps the most important coal market news came last month in late July when Bloomberg reported on a coal trade that could be one of the most expensive coal trades ever recorded in Japan. The deal was between Glencore and Nippon Steel, and the coal was sold at $375 per ton.

As Bloomberg reported: “Nippon Steel Corp. agreed on an annual supply deal through March with Glencore for power plant coal at $375 per ton, according to people with knowledge of the deal, who asked not to be identified because the information is private. The agreement is three times more expensive than similar deals done last year, and is likely one of the costliest coal contracts ever signed by a Japanese company.”

Wind turbines spin near the coal-fired Mehrum Power Station on Feb.14, 2022 in Mehrum, Germany. (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

The bottom line remains, thermal coal is back in demand and that’s not changing for a while. Yes coal is dirty but it is reliable. In fact many believe that there is a moral obligation to produce coal, the moral obligation being that we should mine for coal so others can have access to reliable power and energy.

Radical activists who wax poetically about environmental destruction from fossil fuels are also obsessively determined on destroying industries that brought us into our era of hyper technology and industrialization. They are obsessively determined to destroy jobs instead of supporting energy security and carbon capture research and development.

After all, shouldn’t we look to utilize carbon capture in abandoned coal mines? Should we not find a way to filter flue gas from coal-burning power plants instead of flipping off the switch?

What is the point of destroying the coal mining industry, and taking thousands of jobs with it, if you are still supporting industries that cause harm to the environment?

These radicals—in my opinion—opportunistically fail to see the destruction caused by the manufacturing of renewables, which includes toxicity from lithium-ion batteries, wind turbines killing thousands and thousands of birds, and solar panel fields taking huge swaths of land for energy that only provides power during sunny days.

If there is a middle ground to be found here it will be using profits from fossil fuels to pay for the research and development of less harmful forms of energy.

I can tell you from an investment banking standpoint and from an economic analyst standpoint, that developing new energy is not cheap. It will take billions of dollars in investment, and those billions are going to come from the billions and billions of dollars fossil fuel providers make in profits during boom years.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or Zero Hedge

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 05:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/5LFf3zO Tyler Durden

Brickbat: Cave Man


Bottles of liquor

A British court has ordered Gloucestershire resident Graham Wildin jailed for six weeks for contempt of court for refusing an order to tear down a “man cave” he built without government permission behind his home. The building includes a bar, a bowling alley, casino, movie theater and squash courts. Wildin is still under an order to remove the building after he is released.

The post Brickbat: Cave Man appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/lLGXEIS
via IFTTT

Syria Denies It’s Holding Missing American Journalist Austin Tice

Syria Denies It’s Holding Missing American Journalist Austin Tice

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

The Syrian government denied on Wednesday that it is holding Austin Tice, an American who went missing in Syria in 2012 while working as a freelance journalist.

Damascus was responding to a statement President Biden issued last week, where he said the US knows “with certainty” that the Syrian government has Tice. Syria has always maintained that it does not have Tice detained.

CBS image: Austin Tice, the freelance journalist and veteran who was abducted in Syria a decade ago.

“The US issued last week misleading and illogical statements by the American president and secretary of state that included baseless accusations against Syria that it had kidnapped or detained American citizens, including former US Marine Austin Tice,” the Syrian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The Syrian government also denied reports that it has been holding secret back channel talks with the US about Tice. The Foreign Ministry said that “any official dialogue with the American government will only be public based on the respect of Syria’s sovereignty.”

President Biden hosted Tice’s parents at the White House back in May and told them he directed his team to secure a meeting with top Syrian officials. Tice’s parents have been calling for the Biden administration to hold direct talks with Syria, but there has been no known progress since the May meeting.

“We have repeatedly asked the government of Syria to work with us so that we can bring Austin home” Biden said last Wednesday.

During previous negotiations in 2020 between Syria and the Trump administration, Damascus demanded that the US withdraw all of its troops from Syria, lift sanctions on the country, and normalize relations to start a discussion on US interests.

But the Biden administration has shown no sign that it will change its Syria policy anytime soon. Officially, the administration is pursuing a policy of regime change by conditioning sanctions relief on a “political settlement” that sees President Bashar al-Assad removed from power.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 04:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gAwM72x Tyler Durden

Venezuela Stops Oil Shipments To Europe As Alternatives To Russian Energy Dry Up

Venezuela Stops Oil Shipments To Europe As Alternatives To Russian Energy Dry Up

The writing is on the wall for Europe in terms of this coming winter – It’s going to get ugly.  With natural gas imports from Russia cut by 80% through Nord Stream 1 along with the majority of oil shipments, the EU is going to be scrambling for whatever fuel sources they can find to supply electricity and heating through the coming winter.  Two sources that were originally suggested as alternatives were Iran and Venezuela.

Increased Iranian oil and gas exports to the west are highly dependent on the tentative nuclear deal, but as Goldman Sachs recently suggested, such a deal is unlikely anytime soon as deadlines on proposals have not been met and the Israeli government calls for negotiators to ‘walk away.’ 

Venezuela had restarted shipments to Europe after 2 years of US sanctions under a deal that allows them to trade oil for debt relief.  However, the country’s government has now suspended those shipments, saying it is no longer interested in oil-for-debt deals and instead wants refined fuels from Italian and Spanish producers in exchange for crude.

This might seem like a backwards exchange but Venezuela’s own refineries are struggling to remain in operation because of lack of investment and lack of repairs.  Refined fuels would help them to get back on their feet in terms of energy and industry.  Some of Venezuela’s own heavy oil operations require imported diluents in order to continue.  The EU says it currently has no plans to lift restrictions on the oil-for-debt arrangement, which means Europe has now lost yet another energy source.

Sanctions on Venezuela along with declining investments have strangled their oil industry, with overall production dropping by 38% this July compared to a year ago.  Joe Biden’s initial moves to reopen talks with Maduro triggered inflated hopes that Venezuelan oil would flow once again and offset tight global markets and rising prices.  Europe in particular will soon be desperate for energy alternatives, which will probably result in a scouring of markets this autumn to meet bare minimum requirements for heating.

If this occurs and no regular sources of energy can be found to fill the void left by Russian sanctions, prices will rise precipitously in the EU.  Not only that, but with European countries buying up energy supplies wherever they can find them, available sources will also shrink for every other nation including the US.  Get ready for oil and energy prices to spike once again as winter’s chill returns.  

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/19/2022 – 03:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/rd3h0gW Tyler Durden

Brickbat: Cave Man


Bottles of liquor

A British court has ordered Gloucestershire resident Graham Wildin jailed for six weeks for contempt of court for refusing an order to tear down a “man cave” he built without government permission behind his home. The building includes a bar, a bowling alley, casino, movie theater and squash courts. Wildin is still under an order to remove the building after he is released.

The post Brickbat: Cave Man appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/lLGXEIS
via IFTTT

Cadillac’s $300,000 EV Prototype Spotted On Road For First Time

Cadillac’s $300,000 EV Prototype Spotted On Road For First Time

GM released a series of images showing the Cadillac Celestiq prototype, with a mystical blue and white camouflage wrap, undergoing on-road testing around the company’s facilities in Michigan, according to autoblog GM Authority

The Celestiq is Cadillac’s new EV flagship model that costs a whopping $300,000. Even though the sedan has stylish lines and looks like a Lucid Motors Air (from the front), it’s still a Cadillac, and the price seems ridiculous. 

The electric hatchback is set to reach customers sometime in 2024 and should be equipped with an all-wheel-drive electric powertrain capable of a +300-mile driving range and packed with groundbreaking technologies (including a hands-free assisted-driving system). 

Reading through the comments of autoblog Car and Driver‘s take on the new Cadillac — commenters had mixed feelings about the luxury EV sedan. 

One commenter said: “It’s ugly and over price, and will never compete with Bentley, Mercedes, Or BMW.” 

“It looks great, but 2x the price of a Model S or Lucid?” someone said. 

Another person said: “Ugly, bad name, overpriced, have to remember to plug it in. No thanks.” 

But not all comments were negative: “The most beautiful EV ever built! Hope to see it in production,” someone else said. 

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/18/2022 – 23:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/z2S3M5R Tyler Durden