The New York Times Is Surprised To Find Public Defenders Championing the Second Amendment


Second Amendment

A group of public defense lawyer organizations recently joined forces with Second Amendment advocates to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate a New York gun control scheme. Now that the scheme has been successfully overturned in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which held that the Second Amendment includes the right “to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home,” public defenders have begun citing the Court’s ruling to protect the rights of their clients.

This state of affairs has left some New York Times journalists scratching their heads in surprise. As a recent Times headline put it: “Unlikely Fans of Supreme Court Ruling on Guns: Public Defenders.” The accompanying article describes the Black Attorneys of Legal Aid, the Bronx Defenders, and other groups as “unexpected” allies of the gun rights movement.

But the alliance seems less “unexpected” when you remember that gun control has a racially disparate impact. As the public defender groups told the Supreme Court in an amicus brief, “New York enacted its firearm licensing requirements to criminalize gun ownership by racial and ethnic minorities. That remains the effect of its enforcement by police and prosecutors today.” In other words, Bruen was a win for both gun rights and criminal justice reform.

Likewise, the alliance seems less “unlikely” when you remember that the American civil rights movement has long had a gun rights component. This dates back as far as the abolitionists, such as Frederick Douglass, who declared in 1854 that “the True Remedy for the Fugitive Slave Bill is a good revolver, a steady hand, and a determination to shoot down any man attempting to kidnap.”

Douglass continued to preach the virtues of armed self-defense throughout the rest of his life. In 1893, as the noble aims of Reconstruction were giving way to the horrors of the rising Jim Crow regime, Douglass argued that “the liberties of the American people were dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge box.” Without all three securely in place, he maintained, “no class of people could live and flourish in this country.”

Leading civil rights activists carried on Douglass’ position in the 20th century. “I’m alive today because of the Second Amendment and the natural right to keep and bear arms,” declared John R. Salter Jr., one of the organizers of the famous sit-ins against segregated lunch counters in Jackson, Mississippi. “Like a martyred friend of mine, NAACP staffer Medgar W. Evers, I, too, was on many Klan death lists and I, too, traveled armed: a .38 special Smith and Wesson revolver and a 44/40 Winchester carbine,” Salter said. “The knowledge that I had these weapons and was willing to use them kept enemies at bay.”

The post <i>The New York Times</i> Is Surprised To Find Public Defenders Championing the Second Amendment appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/QG9WjCS
via IFTTT

“No One Is Positioned For Any Good News:” Record Shorting In Tech Ensures ‘Most Hated Rally’ Will Continue

“No One Is Positioned For Any Good News:” Record Shorting In Tech Ensures ‘Most Hated Rally’ Will Continue

July was a tremendous month for stocks, it was also a mediocre (at best) month for hedge funds which not only underperform the S&P when stocks slide (as they did during the crashes of 2020 and early this year), but also underperform the broader market during sharp squeezes like the one that took place in July, prompting some to ask just what is the point of paying someone 2 and 20 to some overweight billionaire to always underperform.

The question of hedge fund utility becomes that much more pressing when one reads in the latest Goldman Sachs Prime Services hedge fund weekly report that while the GS Equity Fundamental L/S Performance Estimate rose +0.57% between 7/22 and 7/28 (roughly a third the performance of broader – and free – MSCI World TR +1.74%), this return was driven almost entirely by beta of +0.56% (i.e., market exposure), with alpha of just +0.01%.

In other words, not only can’t hedge funds generate alpha, they can’t even keep up with the market’s own beta! That will cost 2 and 20, please.

It gets worse; much worse… because while growth and tech names have been screaming higher in the past month, with some names such as Tesla now up a whopping 50% from their May lows (!), instead of capitulating on their market crash bets, hedge funds have been doubling down, and as the following stunning chart from the latest Goldman Prime note (available to pro subscribers) shows, hedge funds have been doubling down on failed bearish bets by short, shorting, and then shorting some more until the short MV as a % of Gross MV line has fallen right off the chart.

As GS Prime puts it: “Information Technology experienced strong short selling momentum (particularly within the US), and was the most net sold sector on a global basis.”

Translation: what the same Goldman recently dubbed the “most hated rally” is set to continue for a good while, because as noted over the weekend, fears of a worst case scenario have not materialized and instead both Fed and ECB easing is now on deck as things are only set to get better.

Others, such as Thomas Hayes, chairman at Great Hill Capital, agree: “No one is positioned for any good news.” He points to cash levels that are at the highest since 9/11, and recession fears at the most pronounced since April 2020 and March 2009.

“The stock market is a discounting mechanism, so while we may be in or will have a recession, the market will bottom far before it is declared,” Hayes says. “Managers will have to chase up and panic buy any further unexpected strength.”

Meanwhile, looking at broader market metrics confirms that it’s not just tech that shorts keep piling in: according to the latest CFTC Committment of Traders data, large speculators in the futures market – mostly hedge funds – turned net short on S&P 500 futures contracts in mid-June as the 500-member index plunged to 3,666.77 and have been net-short the futures for six consecutive weeks since then, incrementally boosting their net bearish positions to nearly 238,000 contracts in the latest week, the most since June 2020!

A similar analysts by Deutsche Bank shows that aggregated US equity futures positions across all markets (S&P500, Russell, Nasdaq, S&P400 and DJIA), remains stock at record shorts!

Needless to say, the strategy of doubling down on losing shorts has not paid off (at least so far) with the S&P 500 just clocked its best month in 20 with a 9.1% bounce, while the Nasdaq 100 Index posted its second-best month since 2010, in no small part by forced squeeze as increasingly more bears have been forced to capitulate.

Repeating what we said two week ago in “Investor Frustration Remains Through The Roof As Pain Trade Is Higher“, Dave Lutz, managing director at JonesTrading Institutional Services, said that “last week’s rally was a huge ‘pain trade’, ” adding that “the S&P holding the 100-day moving average is going to be very painful for those short.”

Adding insult to P&L injury, it wasn’t just hedge fund managers who were bearish: data show investors in traditional funds, too, faded last month’s bounce.

Of course, it’s not that investors didn’t insert money into US stock funds in July — they did, but virtually all of it happened last week, when a $9.2 billion inflow offset three prior withdrawals to flip the monthly scorecard into the positive zone, EPFR Global data analyzed by Jefferies show. The total $4.7 billion inflow into US stocks in the month was less than half of that in June. If anything, this highlights a heated debate about where stocks are headed after July’s run. With half of the S&P 500 quarterly announcements in the rear window, the earnings season is shaping up to be far better than many had feared.

There is one final hail mary for the bear – seasonality. Since 1950, the S&P has essentially been flat in August, both when the index was above or below its 200-day moving average line, data compiled by Oppenheimer show. The S&P has averaged a 0.7% return for any given month.

Actually, there is a second potential rescue, and that would be the world war that would begin once Pelosi lands in Taiwan. Then again, with counterparty risk quote a “hot topic” in a global nuclear exchange, it’s most likely that risk will explode… just before the mushroom clouds.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 14:54

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/o7aVhrz Tyler Durden

Hedge Funds Bullish On U.S. Diesel As Inventories Dwindle

Hedge Funds Bullish On U.S. Diesel As Inventories Dwindle

By John Kemp, senior market analyst at Reuters

Portfolio managers were heavy buyers of U.S. distillates last week, reflecting the continued shortage of diesel and heating oil despite signs of an economic slowdown.

Hedge funds and other money managers purchased the equivalent of 4 million barrels in the six most important petroleum futures and options contracts in the week to July 26.

Purchases of Brent (+12 million barrels) and U.S. gasoline (+1 million) were offset by sales of NYMEX and ICE WTI (-17 million) and European gas oil (-1 million).

But the most significant change was buying of U.S. diesel (+9 million barrels), which funds purchased at the fastest rate since November 2020.

It coincided with ongoing shortages of the fuel used by freight firms, manufacturers, farmers, miners and oil and gas companies themselves.

Distillate fuel oil inventories are rebuilding slowly despite the ramp up in crude processing activity during peak summer gasoline demand season.

Overall, distillate inventories have fallen since late June especially on the East Coast, which includes the delivery point for the NYMEX diesel contract in New York Harbor.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 14:33

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/XyPQ5ud Tyler Durden

McKinney Fire In Northern California Becomes Largest Of Season

McKinney Fire In Northern California Becomes Largest Of Season

Firefighters battle an out-of-control Northern California wildfire near the Oregon state line, growing into the state’s largest wildfire this season in just a few days. 

The McKinney fire exploded in size late Sunday to more than 52,498. The fire remained at 0% contained, consuming dry vegetation in Klamath National Forest, near the city of Yreka. 

Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, declared a state of emergency on Saturday. He said the wildfire “threatened critical infrastructure” and “destroyed homes” after breaking out on Friday. 

The fire was “intensified and spread by dry fuels, extreme drought conditions, high temperatures, winds, and lightning storms,” Newsom added. 

“These conditions can be extremely dangerous for firefighters, as winds can be erratic and extremely strong, causing fire to spread in any direction,” forest service officials said.

California Office of Emergency Services said more than 2,000 residents were under evacuation orders, and 200 were under evacuation warnings. Most of the evacuation warnings were in Siskiyou County. 

Here are videos from within the inferno. 

The Siskiyou County sheriff tweeted: “Surrounding areas should be ready to leave if needed. Please don’t hesitate to evacuate.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 14:12

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wb69ZVE Tyler Durden

Proposed Bill Would Protect Journalists Like Julian Assange From Espionage Charges


Assange protest poster

Three members of Congress are attempting to avoid future Julian Assange–style prosecutions by amending the U.S. espionage law so that it doesn’t apply to journalists.

Last week, Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) and Reps. Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) partnered up to reintroduce the Espionage Act Reform Act. The Espionage Act, passed in 1917, is ostensibly intended to punish and imprison government employees and contractors for providing or selling state secrets to enemy governments. In practice, the law has been brought to bear time and time again to attempt to punish journalists and whistleblowers for attempting to inform the public about serious issues the U.S. government would prefer to keep secret. While people like Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, Iraq War leaker Chelsea Manning, domestic surveillance whistleblower Edward Snowden, drone whistleblower Daniel Hale, and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange aren’t spies of foreign governments, many have been threatened with or thrown into prison as if they were.

The Espionage Act Reform Act would change the law in a couple of ways. First of all, the reform would clarify that the espionage law specifically affects people authorized to receive confidential government information (federal employees or contractors), meaning that journalists who receive classified information and publish it are not engaging in espionage. It also establishes that whistleblowers within the government are able to turn to members of Congress, federal courts, an inspector general, and a couple of other key oversight agencies with important classified information without running afoul of the law.

In short, the goal is to align the law with what people think that the law is for—to punish spies, not people trying to warn lawmakers or the public about federal government misconduct.

“At a time when government officials claim the right to perform warrantless surveillance upon all American citizens, there is an urgent need to zealously guard freedom of the press and to demand government transparency and accountability,” Massie said in a prepared statement. “The ongoing attempts to prosecute journalists like Julian Assange under the Espionage Act threaten our First Amendment rights, and should be opposed by all who wish to safeguard our constitutional rights now and in the years to come.”

Assange still currently faces extradition from the U.K. to the United States, where he faces 18 separate espionage-related charges for publishing the documents provided by Manning. Media watchdogs and human rights groups have been warning that the prosecution of Assange serves as a threat to journalism and compromises free speech.

The Knight First Amendment Institute supports the bill and sent out a statement urging for better safeguards for those who report on important national security issues.

“We welcome this bill, which would provide important new protection for press freedom in the United States,” said Carrie DeCell, senior staff attorney for the Institute. “It would provide crucial safeguards for national-security journalists, enabling them to report on issues of indisputable interest to the public without fear of criminal liability. Congress should enact this bill and also provide additional protections to national-security whistleblowers.”

Khanna and Wyden first introduced the bill in 2020. Each of them was referred to their respective House and Senate Judiciary Committees, where they sat with no further action.

The post Proposed Bill Would Protect Journalists Like Julian Assange From Espionage Charges appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/m5aX79C
via IFTTT

EU, UK Fold? Delay Cutting Off Russia From Oil Insurance Market

EU, UK Fold? Delay Cutting Off Russia From Oil Insurance Market

Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com,

  • The EU and UK insurance ban was to be a much bigger deal than the actual EU embargo on Russian oil imports.

  • The EU and the UK have slowed efforts to have Russia shut off from the most important maritime insurance market.

  • Full insurance ban could push oil prices even higher.

The EU and the UK have slowed efforts to have Russia shut off from the most important maritime insurance market amid concerns that a full insurance ban would limit global oil supply and push oil prices even higher, the Financial Times reports, citing UK and EU officials.

The UK was set to join an EU insurance ban after the UK and the European Union agreed in May to jointly shut off Russia’s access to oil cargo insurance. Under those plans, Russia would be effectively shut out of more than 90% of the global oil shipment insurance market.  

The insurance ban was to be a much bigger deal than the actual EU embargo on Russian oil imports, as it would cripple Russia’s ability to export crude anywhere in the world, analysts said at the time.

However, the UK has yet to introduce such restrictions on maritime insurance, FT notes. The UK participation with the scheme is crucial because London and the UK are home to many of the world’s biggest maritime insurers.

“There is no current UK ban affecting global shipments of Russian oil,” Patrick Davison, underwriting director of the Lloyd’s Market Association, told the FT.

The EU has also eased some of the initial insurance restrictions after saying ten days ago that:

“With a view to avoid any potential negative consequences for food and energy security around the world, the EU decided to extend the exemption from the prohibition to engage in transactions with certain state-owned entities as regards transactions for agricultural products and the transport of oil to third countries.”

Thus, the EU effectively still allows transactions with Russia’s state oil firms if the transportation of oil is for third countries, that is, such outside the EU.

Concerns about soaring energy prices have prompted the United States to look to convince major oil importers, including Russia’s key buyers these days, China and India, to endorse a plan to cap the price of Russian oil they are buying. The G7 group of leading industrialized nations, led by the United States, is considering waiving the ban on insurance and all services enabling transportation of Russian oil if that oil is bought at or below a certain price, yet to be decided. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 13:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gSyYIi3 Tyler Durden

North Korea Preparing 1st Nuclear Test In 5 Years, Blinken Informs UN

North Korea Preparing 1st Nuclear Test In 5 Years, Blinken Informs UN

As if the region needed to grow hotter at this moment of all eyes being on Nancy Pelosi’s Asia trip and potential landing in Taiwan, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced Monday that North Korea is preparing to conduct its seventh nuclear test.

The words came as Blinken addressed 10th NPT Review Conference (or Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) at UN headquarters in New York. He stressed ongoing nuclear threats posted by North Korea and Iran during the speech, saying “And so we come together at a critical moment. The DPRK continues to expand its unlawful nuclear program and continues its ongoing provocations against the region.”

That’s when he specified, “As we gather today Pyongyang is preparing to conduct its seventh nuclear test. Iran remains on a path of nuclear escalation.” He said while also citing officials in Seoul that it’s the US assessment that the North has completed “all preparations” for a nuclear test, but that the timing is as yet uncertain. 

He cited the US position as that which “seeks to avoid costly arms races” – though perhaps ironically the assertion comes even as Washington ramps up arms shipment to Ukraine to repel Russia, in proxy war fashion.

It has been years since North Korea has conducted a nuclear test, with the last known test having happened in September 2017, which was met with international condemnation. Pyongyang formally abandoned its participation in the NPT starting in January 2003.

Last month the US, Japan, and South Korea agreed to coordinate closely on deterring threats from North Korea. Japanese Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi said three weeks ago while Blinken was visiting, “North Korea’s nuclear and missile development poses a threat to the peace and stability of Japan and the international community, and is totally unacceptable.” 

As for Iran, the nuclear deal which has been focus of the long drawn-out Vienna process has been hanging by a thread, with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borell having this weekend offered a last-ditch proposal to revive the JCPOA.

At the same time, Israel has ramped up its rhetoric, saying it reserves the right to attack the Islamic Republic if it’s on the cusp of achieving nuclear weapons – a threat that’s been repeated consistently from various Israeli officials in recent months.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 13:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/tsTQRWN Tyler Durden

Has Fox News Effectively Banned Trump From Appearing On Their Network?

Has Fox News Effectively Banned Trump From Appearing On Their Network?

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News (emphasis ours),

Fox News has effectively banned Donald Trump from appearing on their network in what seems to be part of a deliberate move to throw its support behind Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

Drew Angerer via Getty Images

A report by the New York Times noted that Trump has not appeared on Fox News in over 100 days in what seems to be part of an intentional effort to freeze out his 2024 candidacy.

Having last appeared on Sean Hannity’s show on April 13, Trump himself complained that his old friend “doesn’t seem to be paying him much attention anymore.”

According to Newsmax, this is a clear sign that Fox is “banning” Trump from the network altogether as it prepares to throw its full weight behind DeSantis.

The right-wing news outlet pointed to a video released by Fox News two weeks ago which showed ‘man on the street’ style interviews with Trump supporters who said they don’t want him to run again and “unanimously backed DeSantis for 2024.”

A decision has reportedly been made at “the highest levels” of Fox’s parent company and by the Murdoch family to shun Trump entirely.

“Fox News opposed Trump in 2016 when it mattered and right before the 2020 election the Daily Beast reported that Rupert Murdoch was predicting Trump will lose “in a landslide,” points out Chris Menahan.

“The Daily Beast credited “three people who have spoke with Murdoch” for the scoop but I suspect Murdoch just gave them the story himself.”

Trump has repeatedly suggested he will run for the presidency again in 2024, although many supporters expected him to announce his candidacy in July and that never happened.

The former president is still weighing up whether to make the announcement before or after this year’s mid-terms, which Republicans are expected to win handsomely.

Last month, an unlisted video discovered on YouTube showed Trump’s plane getting a new paint job, suggesting he could be about to announce his 2024 bid to return to the White House.

Trump reportedly told allies recently that if he is re-elected he will impose a “purge” of the deep state and right the wrongs of his first term.

As we highlighted earlier, Trump trolled Biden by suggesting he caught dementia, not COVID, and will retire part time to a nursing home.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/01/2022 – 13:09

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3NndoEJ Tyler Durden

The New York Times Is Surprised To Find Public Defenders Championing the Second Amendment


Second Amendment

A group of public defense lawyer organizations recently joined forces with Second Amendment advocates to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate a New York gun control scheme. Now that the scheme has been successfully overturned in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which held that the Second Amendment includes the right “to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home,” public defenders have begun citing the Court’s ruling to protect the rights of their clients.

This state of affairs has left some New York Times journalists scratching their heads in surprise. As a recent Times headline put it: “Unlikely Fans of Supreme Court Ruling on Guns: Public Defenders.” The accompanying article describes the Black Attorneys of Legal Aid, the Bronx Defenders, and other groups as “unexpected” allies of the gun rights movement.

But the alliance seems less “unexpected” when you remember that gun control has a racially disparate impact. As the public defender groups told the Supreme Court in an amicus brief, “New York enacted its firearm licensing requirements to criminalize gun ownership by racial and ethnic minorities. That remains the effect of its enforcement by police and prosecutors today.” In other words, Bruen was a win for both gun rights and criminal justice reform.

Likewise, the alliance seems less “unlikely” when you remember that the American civil rights movement has long had a gun rights component. This dates back as far as the abolitionists, such as Frederick Douglass, who declared in 1854 that “the True Remedy for the Fugitive Slave Bill is a good revolver, a steady hand, and a determination to shoot down any man attempting to kidnap.”

Douglass continued to preach the virtues of armed self-defense throughout the rest of his life. In 1893, as the noble aims of Reconstruction were giving way to the horrors of the rising Jim Crow regime, Douglass argued that “the liberties of the American people were dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge box.” Without all three securely in place, he maintained, “no class of people could live and flourish in this country.”

Leading civil rights activists carried on Douglass’ position in the 20th century. “I’m alive today because of the Second Amendment and the natural right to keep and bear arms,” declared John R. Salter Jr., one of the organizers of the famous sit-ins against segregated lunch counters in Jackson, Mississippi. “Like a martyred friend of mine, NAACP staffer Medgar W. Evers, I, too, was on many Klan death lists and I, too, traveled armed: a .38 special Smith and Wesson revolver and a 44/40 Winchester carbine,” Salter said. “The knowledge that I had these weapons and was willing to use them kept enemies at bay.”

The post <i>The New York Times</i> Is Surprised To Find Public Defenders Championing the Second Amendment appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/QG9WjCS
via IFTTT

Biden’s New Bureau of Prisons Director Won’t be Able To Run Away From the Agency’s Corruption


New Bureau of Prisons Director Named

We last saw outgoing Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Director Michael Carvajal running down a stairwell on July 26. He was trying to get away from some Associated Press reporters who revealed systemic dysfunction and corruption within the federal prison system—an apt ending for his tenure.

Carvajal had just finished testifying before a Senate subcommittee conducting a bipartisan investigation into corruption and abuse at a federal prison complex in Atlanta. Congressional investigators found that senior leadership at both the complex and the BOP had been aware of the issues for years.

With Carvajal jogging his way out of office—his resignation was announced in January—it will be Colette Peters’ turn to sit in the hot seat. The Biden administration announced last month that it was tapping Peters, the director of Oregon’s prison system, to head the beleaguered BOP. Previous directors have almost all come up through the agency, so the choice of an outsider is a signal in itself that the administration has lost faith in the BOP leadership. 

Peters has told the Associated Press that she wants to “create an environment where people can feel comfortable coming forward and talking about misconduct.” That will be no easy task, and she won’t be able to outrun the problems she’s inheriting. Corruption, dysfunction, and civil rights abuses have infected every level of management in the large federal agency. 

“From sexual violence and medical neglect to understaffing and years-long lockdowns, the BOP’s leadership has allowed a humanitarian crisis to develop on its watch,” Kevin Ring, president of the criminal justice advocacy nonprofit FAMM, said in a press release. “Families with incarcerated loved ones have been begging for change.”

Last month, the head of the local BOP employee union at FMC Carswell, a federal medical center for incarcerated women, told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that—as the newspaper summarized it—”upper management at the prison covers up reports of misconduct by supervisors, retaliates against staff who file complaints and violates federal law by not honoring contract negotiations.”

In February, an Associated Press investigation into FCI Dublin, a federal women’s prison in California, found “a permissive and toxic culture at the Bay Area lockup, enabling years of sexual misconduct by predatory employees and cover-ups that have largely kept the abuse out of the public eye.”

Reason reported in 2020 on allegations of three cases of fatal medical neglect at FCI Aliceville, a federal women’s prison in Alabama. The daughters of one woman who died in Aliceville, Hazel McGary, said they had been calling the prison for months trying to get help for their increasingly sick mother.

“They ain’t do nothing,” Kentiesha Kimble told Reason. “They laughed at her. They said she was faking. They told us she was too young to be having a heart attack.”

The story also included a former inmate at Carswell who recounted watching a woman in a wheelchair die from a heart attack after being turned away by medical staff several times.

In 2019, 14 current and former inmates of a federal women’s prison in Florida filed a lawsuit saying guards subjected them to unending sexual abuse and threats. The suit also claimed that prison leadership created a “sanctuary” for guards who were known sexual predators. The federal government later settled the suit.

Congressional investigators released a report in 2019 finding that serious misconduct at BOP is “largely tolerated or ignored altogether.”

USA Today reported in 2018 on staffing problems that resulted in prison nurses and other auxiliary staff being pressed into guard duty. 

The COVID-19 pandemic only exacerbated the problems within federal prisons. There were extended lockdowns, months of nothing but cold and paltry food, and allegations from both correctional officer unions and inmates that the BOP had deeply botched its response to the virus. 

Reason reported that the first female federal inmate to die of COVID-19, Andrea Circle Bear, was transferred to federal prison despite being pregnant. She was admitted to a hospital less than a week later. She died several weeks after being placed on a ventilator and having an emergency cesarean section to deliver her baby. She was serving a 2-year sentence for a nonviolent drug crime.

“During Carvajal’s tenure, the BOP has been a black box,” Ring said. “When COVID began spreading in federal prisons and families’ fears were at their greatest, Carvajal and the BOP somehow became less transparent. The BOP’s opaqueness felt like cruelty. We hope the incoming secretary is prepared to make significant changes to a system badly in need of them.”

The post Biden's New Bureau of Prisons Director Won't be Able To Run Away From the Agency's Corruption appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/BzwFYKi
via IFTTT