Lagging Demand Won’t Keep Gas Prices From Soaring Again

Lagging Demand Won’t Keep Gas Prices From Soaring Again

Authored by Alex Kimani via OilPrice.com,

After peaking in early-May at $5.02 per gallon, U.S. national average gas prices have declined for 70 straight days to trade at $3.88 per gallon on Wednesday, marking the second-longest losing streak in two decades.

But experts are now warning that consumers should not be lulled into a false sense of confidence thinking the cuts will last. In an interview with Yahoo Finance Live, Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, has warned that two factors could put upward pressure on gas prices: reserves and sanctions.

Even if demand dips [for gasoline], supply will dip with it, and I don’t see a significant pullback. If anything, I think that gasoline prices on the national average will probably rise from here,” Babin has said.

Babin notes the giant SPR release of oil reserves by the Biden administration is set to end in November while Europe is due to implement sanctions on Russia in December.

She argues that both factors could cut oil supply, pushing prices higher and rippling through to gasoline.

Compounding matters is the fact that this will coincide with the heating oil season in North America, meaning refiners will be more inclined to make crude into heating oil instead of gasoline.

Since the beginning of the week, crude oil prices have been paring back earlier losses after Saudi Oil Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said the current bear market may require OPEC+ to tighten production because futures prices do not reflect underlying fundamentals of supply and demand.

“Extreme volatility and lack of liquidity in the futures market are moving prices in ways that do not conform to normal supply and demand factors, which may spark OPEC+ to take action,’’ the Saudi oil chief warned.

Bloomberg Opinion columnist Javier Blas says $100 oil just got a lot more likely following bin Salman’s comments: Call it a price floor, the return of the OPEC+ put or, simply, a line in the sand. Whatever its name, Riyadh’s intervention indicates a preference to keep oil near $100.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 11:41

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/5IktL30 Tyler Durden

Moderna Sues Pfizer, BioNTech Over COVID Vaccines

Moderna Sues Pfizer, BioNTech Over COVID Vaccines

Moderna announced on Friday that it’s suing rivals Pfizer and BioNTech SE, claiming that the mRNA technology in their Covid-19 jab infringes on its patents.

The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court in Massachusetts as well as in Germany, seeks unspecified monetary damages for patent infringement, and sets the stage for a massive legal battle between the three vaccine makers.

In a Friday statement, the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Moderna accused partners Pfizer and BioNTech of violating key mRNA patents in the development of the Comirnaty vaccine. The company says it had patents from 2010 to 2016 on mRNA technology which made its Spikevax jab possible, which the other two companies copied without permission.

Moderna said it’s not asking the courts to pull the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine from the market nor to block future sales. The company is seeking damages for the period starting March 8 of this year and says it will not seek damages for Pfizer’s sales to 92 lower- and middle-income countries. Early in the Covid crisis, Moderna promised not to enforce its intellectual property during the pandemic, but on March 7 it modified that pledge to apply only to lower-income countries, essentially making this litigation possible. -Bloomberg

“We are filing these lawsuits to protect the innovative mRNA technology platform that we pioneered, invested billions of dollars in creating, and patented during the decade preceding the Covid-19 pandemic,” said Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel in a statement.

Pfizer recorded almost $37 billion in sales from Comirnaty last year, while Moderna made roughly $18 billion from Spikevax.

The lawsuit is the latest – and undoubtedly will be the largest – within the industry. Earlier this year, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals sued Moderna, Pfizer and BioNTech over lipid nanoparticle technology used in both of their Covid vaccines, while Moderna has been in a legal battle with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over whether agency scientists should be listed as inventors on their jab.

In their lawsuit, Moderna says Pfizer and BioNTech had other options but “decided to proceed with a vaccine that has the same exact mRNA chemical modification to its vaccine” as their treatment. It also accused the pair of copying its method of encoding a full-length spike protein in a lipid nanoparticle.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 11:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/1XQB06n Tyler Durden

Heavily Redacted Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit Now Available

It’s here, and you can also read the government’s memorandum explaining the reasons for the redactions (though it’s itself substantially redacted).

The post Heavily Redacted Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit Now Available appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/gEDprJs
via IFTTT

40 Percent of D.C.’s Black Teens Will Soon Be Barred From School Because They Aren’t Vaccinated


Muriel Bowser

School starts on Monday for District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS), which is requiring—per D.C. Council vote—that all students ages 12 and up be vaccinated against COVID-19. In addition to teens providing proof of vaccination, students of all ages must provide proof of a negative COVID test prior to the first day of school.

“We’re not offering remote learning for children, and families will need to comply with what is necessary to come to school,” said Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser in a press briefing.

Though students will be allowed limited medical and religious exemptions from vaccine requirements, a significant chunk of the District’s teens remain unvaccinated, per current data. That number is significantly higher for black teens: Though 87 percent of D.C.’s white teens, between the ages of 12 and 15, are vaccinated, only 53 percent of D.C.’s black teens are. For the next age group up—comprised of 16- and 17-year-olds—89 percent of white teens are fully vaccinated, whereas only 58 percent of black teens are.

In many other contexts, a city policy having such a racially disparate impact would be cause for concern, particularly for progressives who frequently measure and seek to remedy such impacts. In this context, Bowser and D.C. Council members appear to be less concerned that these restrictive policies might lead to a disproportionate increase in truancy, which could result in parents being harassed and monitored by D.C.’s Child and Family Services Agency (or even, in extreme cases, locked up and forced to pay fines), purportedly out of the state’s concern for the good of the children.

Both D.C. Health and Bowser have been explicit about the fact that unexcused absences due to lack of immunization may lead not just to schools “routinely contacting the parent, guardian, or adult student; placing phone calls; sending written notices to the home; referring students to Student Support Teams” but also may include “making referrals to CFSA, the Child Support Services Division, and the Office of the Attorney General, for truancy or educational neglect.”

Public schools have long mandated certain vaccines for attendees, like those that protect against measles, polio, and pertussis. D.C. Health has noted that even routine vaccination rates, especially for poor and minority kids, have been lagging—possibly an unintended consequence of COVID lockdowns and people skipping medical checkups. But it’s strange to add COVID vaccines to that list, given that the virus itself is not nearly as serious as measles or polio, and given that these vaccines have only recently been approved for kids.

Though there are practical reasons to want teens to be vaccinated—like preventing classwide outbreaks that might lead to lots of absences—COVID vaccines do a very imperfect job of preventing breakthrough infections. They are valuable primarily for preventing severe illness and death, which already occur infrequently for teens and kids.

Given this, city authorities could reasonably recommend that kids get vaccinated prior to attending public school, as many school districts have. But they have instead chosen to mandate it, which is out of step with the choices of most other school districts in the nation.

This is par for the course for some of the municipalities filled with the most insistent COVID hawks. This week, Bay Area school authorities called the cops on an unmasked 4-year-old and his father in an attempt to get them to leave school premises for masking violations. Similarly, Los Angeles County’s public health boss, Barbara Ferrer, toyed last month with the idea of reintroducing mask mandates for residents, before being met with threats of insubordination from the residents of Beverly Hills. (Ferrer soon scrapped her plans.)

Authorities should not, in general, create laws or policies they’re not comfortable enforcing; it’s therefore quite astonishing that, 30 months into this pandemic, Bowser thinks COVID vaccination is so important to mandate that it would be worth an increase in the number of minority parents investigated or possibly locked up for their kids’ truancy.

But that seems like a horribly costly punishment for a debatable “crime” of questionable public health merit, not to mention the host of civil liberties issues raised by mandating proof of COVID vaccination. D.C. officials should think long and hard about whether it’s worth it.

The post 40 Percent of D.C.'s Black Teens Will Soon Be Barred From School Because They Aren't Vaccinated appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/tyfgMkh
via IFTTT

Heavily Redacted Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit Now Available

It’s here, and you can also read the government’s memorandum explaining the reasons for the redactions (though it’s itself substantially redacted).

The post Heavily Redacted Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit Now Available appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/gEDprJs
via IFTTT

Watch: WH Press Secretary Refuses To Answer Question “What Is Semi-Fascism?”

Watch: WH Press Secretary Refuses To Answer Question “What Is Semi-Fascism?”

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

After Joe Biden declared that so called MAGA Republicans are “semi-fascists” and “a threat to our democracy,” and charged that they “embrace political violence,” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refused to explain what Biden meant.

Earlier in the day, a yelling Biden blurted “The MAGA Republicans don’t just threaten our personal rights and economic security,” and further declared that “MAGA Republicans” are “a threat to our very democracy. They refuse to accept the will of the people. They embrace — embrace — political violence. They don’t believe in democracy.”

“It’s not hyperbole,” he continued, adding “America is at a genuine inflection point. It occurs every six or seven generations in world history,” and further proclaiming “What we’re seeing now is either the beginning or the death knell of an extreme MAGA philosophy… It’s not just Trump, it’s the entire philosophy that underpins the — I’m going to say something — it’s like semi-fascism.”

“I respect conservative Republicans,” Biden said, adding “I don’t respect these MAGA Republicans.”

In a later appearance on CNN, Jean-Pierre attempted to word salad her way out of explaining what “semi-fascism” is.

Host Don Lemon directly asked “the President likened what he called extreme MAGA philosophy to semi-fascism. What exactly is semi-fascism, Karine?” 

When the Press Secretary immediately veered off the subject, Lemon interjected and stated “with all due respect. We have a short amount of time. I want to get to all those things  But if you’ll answer my question, we can get to those things.” 

He again asked “what exactly is semi-fascism?” 

Jean-Pierre again refused to answer and testily snapped “by having this back and forth we are actually taking away from the time.” 

Jean-Pierre repeated the claim that “this MAGA element of the Republican Party” is “attacking our democracy, they are taking away our freedom.”

Despite not answering the question, Lemon thanked her for answering the question.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 11:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/k93TFux Tyler Durden

Wall Street Reacts To Powell’s Brief Jackson Hole Speech

Wall Street Reacts To Powell’s Brief Jackson Hole Speech

Powell’s J-hole speech was a paltry 1,301 words and was over in just about 8 minutes, far below the 30 minutes scheduled, and despite the remarkable brevity, it still left Wall Street with conflicting views about what he said: the doves said it was not hawkish enough, while the hawks pointed to Powell’s warning that pain lies ahead for households and businesses due to “higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions.”

And while the market tries to find the correct level now that Powell is done with kneejerk moves first lower, then higher, and now lower again, below we excerpt from some of Wall Street’s first notable reactions to Powell’s speech:

  • Dennis DeBusschere, founder of 22V Research: “This is not game-changing hawkish. At all. His comments are just making it clear that inflation still needs to slow and they will continue to push back against easier financial conditions until mission accomplished — or they think mission accomplished.
  • Neil Dutta of Renaissance Macro: “Powell is being more upfront about the pain required to bring inflation to the Fed’s longer run objectives.‘Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth.”
  • Bloomberg Economics’ Anna Wong: “Well that was quick! Powell was expected to speak for 30 minutes but in the end took the mic for just 10. The most hawkish part of his speech was that the soft July inflation reading won’t sway the Fed. The bottom line is that the tight labor market and wage-growth momentum will keep the central bank in inflation-fighting mode.
  • BMO’s Ian Lyngen: “Powell’s comments were remarkably in line with market expectations. He emphasized that the size of the September rate hike hinges on the ‘totality’ of the data — this is telling in two regards 1) there will be a hike (which was a given) and 2) July’s inflation data isn’t enough to take 75 bp off the table — so the debate remains 75 vs. 50 at least until we see the September 13 release of August’s CPI.”  
    “In the wake of Powell, the flattening response aligned with the commitment from the Chair to continue tightening… as the market digests the headlines and trading volumes thin out, we’ll be looking for month-end duration needs in the week ahead to add to the flattening trend.”
  • Oppenheimer’s Alon Rosin: “Whole Lot of nothing new!!?? Relief, no moves..yesterday priced that in??”
  • Sameer Samana at Wells Fargo Investment Institute:Powell did exactly what was needed, which was emphasizing that it would take time with rates in restrictive territory to solve inflation, and to push back on this notion of a pivot early next year Markets should remain volatile for the foreseeable future, until such time that additional progress is made on either inflation coming down or markets offer much cheaper valuations.”
  • Mark Cabana, head of Rates Strategy at BofA: “The rates market initially saw the speech as hawkish and forceful in its commitment to restore price stability. However, this move subsequently retraced given the limited explicit guidance from Powell.”
  •  Max Gokhman, chief investment officer for AlphaTrAI: Bull-hunting season is open at Jackson Hole, but so far all Powell and the rest of the Fed have been able to do is spook the herd by using low-caliber academic language that just doesn’t have the firepower of speaking plainly about policy that’s going to be restrictive for far longer than expectations.”
  • Bryce Doty at Sit Investment Associates: it’s hard to believe the Fed’s ‘Damn the Torpedoes’ approach toward thinking the key to stopping inflation is to raise rates enough to destroy jobs. Just means shortages will continue. The labor market might be considered strong, but it’s certainly not healthy.”
  • Michael Pearce, economist at Capital Economics:  “Powell’s speech was concise by Jackson Hole standards and hawkish throughout…. That appears to be part of a coordinated push from recent Fed speakers against the idea that the Fed is close to pivoting and will quickly turn attention to cutting rates again.”
  • Zhiwei Ren at Penn Mutual:Powell mentioned his willingness to tolerate a softer labor market and economy to achieve the inflation mandate. He cautioned the risk of ‘prematurely’ loosening. He also said restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time. This is him pushing back the market pricing in rate cuts in 2023.”  
  • George Concalves, rates strategist at Mitsubishi UFG: a break of 3.45% on the 2yr is on the cards” as the Fed’s message is one of getting policy into the 3.75%-4% area. Also keeping Treasury yields across the curve above 3% is Powell’s view of keeping policy higher for longer and won’t pivot anytime soon.It’s a wakeup call for equities as they are still looking for a Fed pivot. There has been a unified hawkish message from the Fed and Powell has been the capstone today.”

Putting it all together, Bloomberg’s Steve Matthews notes that the overall take is that Powell was moderately hawkish. The Fed chair is prepared for the economy and households to sustain some “pain” in order to lower inflation. He issued a dire-sounding warning against prematurely loosening policy. And while the recent improvement in inflation is welcome, he pushed back against it and said the Fed needs to see a lot more. He balanced that a bit by repeating that the Fed will slow down rate hikes “at some point” and left the debate on the size of the September increase to another day.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 10:42

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2wVcZRM Tyler Durden

Stocks Drop As Rate-Hike Odds Pop After Powell’s Brief Message

Stocks Drop As Rate-Hike Odds Pop After Powell’s Brief Message

While reactions to Fed Chair Powell’s 8 minute message are varied, the markets’ response seems sure – hawkish-er than expected…

The odds of a 75bps hike in September are back above 60%…

The short-end of the yield curve is spiking relative to the long-end…

The yield curve is flattening/inverting even further…

And stocks are sliding fast on the not-dovish-enough message…

The dollar is higher post-Powell…

But the question is – will this hawkish/recession-implying reaction hold in these illiquid markets?

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 10:31

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/JK4knIl Tyler Durden

Blain: Prepare For A Winter Of Discontent

Blain: Prepare For A Winter Of Discontent

Authored by Bill Blain via MorningPorridge.com,

“Bang, Bang, on the door.. we can’t hear you”

As summer wends towards its end, a winter of populist discontent from left and right will make Europe increasingly fraxious. While the US economy will likely be on path to recovery – Europe will still be trending down.

Today the market is on tenterhooks, waiting to hear words of wisdom from Jerome Powell and his thoughts on Life, Death, the Meaning of Everything, and US interest rates. (The answer, BTW, is probably 42.) Every market player, watcher, and fretter is set to make a nuanced response to whatever he says. Simples – rates go up, but only till we’ve licked inflation, or something similar. Next week we will know..

Yawn… Can I hold my attention long enough to listen to a day of Jackson Hole? There is a mellow mist on the river, burning off as the sun rises. It’s the end of a long hot summer. We have a bank holiday in the UK on Monday, and next week is Labour Day in the US.. We should enjoy it while we can. I would skive off for a swim, sail or paddleboard – but I’ve scored a winning lottery ticket!

Yep, I’ve got an actual, real, proper 10 min consultation with my GP this morning – to notionally check my dodgy ticker. He will look up and nod as I come in, tell me to lose weight, and scribble something on his screen. Most importantly, he will hopefully sign a referral to go see a private cardiac consultant. It will be the same consultant I would see under the NHS, but with the advantage I will get to speak to him this decade. I am a fortunate.

Life and markets are going to get terribly serious in the next few months. Winter is Coming, social unrest approaches, White Walkers and Putin’s Energy Games promise us a Fimblewinter of stress before the ultimate Ragnarök of economic crisis. (Overly dramatic perhaps.)

I’m wondering if it’s even worth planting spring bulbs this autumn….

(OK – I admit it – a few too many Game of Thrones quotes this week. That’s because I watched the new House of the Dragon… and thought it ok. Anything with Dragons  is likely to be good. Opinion does seem divided on Matt Smith, former Dr Who and Prince Philip (from The Crown). He looks the part of an inbred mad prince, but is he villainous enough? We shall see..)

Meanwhile, back in the fantasy world of Yoorp…

There is a very scary comment in the Times about how Germany is set for an outbreak of radical protest this autumn – “Extremists plan “autumn of rage” to exploit cost of living crisis in Germany.” Speaking to a French chum yesterday, he was warning me to stay clear of Paris – the Gillet Jaune are being superseded by a far more radical left and younger protest base. The German protests have been infiltrated by the extreme right. The French by the left. You can just imagine what happens when they clash. You have to wonder, what hand Moscow has played in fermenting crisis and revolt across social media – it can’t be underestimated as a threat.

All the signs point to escalating unrest across Europe this autumn into Winter. Inflation, cost of living, energy costs, power outages, cold snaps, recession, jobs, immigration, populist politics, the failure of conventional politics, and overlay it all with increasing Russian fake-news and Kremlin Troll-bots… something is going to break this winter. The Times thinks it will be East Germany as the Epicentre. My Paris chum says Paris. I reckon Eastern Europe.

The politics of Autumn in Europe could be a massive no-see-um market shock.

There are a couple of things to make me fear it’s going to be even worse than we fear..

Liz Truss is going to start her UK Presidency by declaring war on Europe over the Northern Ireland protocols, and picking President Macron of France as her first target. I am assured she is also thinking about the other stuff, like addressing the consumer cost of living crisis, or government support on stratospheric energy bills, but the advantage of blaming the EU for the Norn Irn confustabilation is: it looks tough, considered, and Maggie-like – or so Lord Mogg has told her. I despair.

Meanwhile, there may be some hope. 

Some politicians have been thinking outside the box. Surprisingly, it was in Germany.

The Germans, curiously, actually tried to do something about the miserable state of their economy this summer. Through August they slashed the price of rail transport to Euro 9 per month for unlimited train and bus travel – and it was a stunning, spectacular success. Naturally, being Germans, they are now abandoning the policy.

The monthly season ticket giveaway resulted in a huge number of Germans jumping on trains to go see their country. I know German trains – anything is better than UK trains – and they are good if not perfect. The cheap tickets resulted in over 30 mm Germans travelling, many catching a train for the first time. There were inevitable problems – many trains were packed, causing consternation for regular travellers. Some say car use actually increased to get people to stations!

It was also costly – €14 bln per annum, the Government said. So, they closed the initiative after a month. They are going to spend the money on “modernising Germany’s crumbling rail network and expanding capacity” says the FT, quoting some German politician.

The German experiment is fascinating. Yes, the trains were packed, busy and difficult for a month – but the entertainment/novelty value would soon wear off. It would be good to see how long-term cheap fares would impact the German economy. Would a €14 bln Government ticket subsidy increase economic activity in terms of long-term increased domestic travel and spend, or from increased commuting to work?

Regular readers here in the UK will know rail is my ultimate bug-bear…

My commute used to be a doddle. When first I moved out of London many years ago, the train from Southampton to London was 1 hour, reliable and very comfortable. I wrote the Porridge sitting at a nice comfy table, arriving refreshed into Waterloo. I was happy spending 2 hours working on the train each day – there and back. Not a problem. It was expensive – £400 per month, but it was a decent trade off to live out of London.

Then we bought a flat in London. Commuted up on a Monday and back on Friday. Then it became back on a Thursday, and eventually three days a week in London.. And I missed the weekdays at home. Living in a London flat – even though it overlooked the river was limiting. Here, I can go for walks, sail, swim and all the good stuff. In London I could go for a walk and get mugged. It’s just easier not living in London.

Post pandemic I am commuting again. But the train service is a travesty. In order “to improve the customer experience” the one-hour train is now one-hour twenty minutes. It’s no longer an express, but stops, meaning it gets very busy. It’s no longer comfortable seats with tables – its tiny little seats my arse doesn’t fit. And it now costs me over £80 per day for a return ticket. The two hours I used to write the Porridge in are now 3 hours of travelling purgatory on rolling stock almost my age, and pot-luck whether the air-con works.

Forget about improving the service, or improving the infrastrucuture – there is no government interest or incentive to improve trains. Which means the potential economic benefits of expanding the London commuter belt with comfortable, green transport to boost its commercial mass is simply never going to happen. I am never going back to live in London – even though I know my business would benefit from being in London more often. It was possible 10 years ago, but neglect and underinvestment mean’s it’s impossible today.

Enough ranting about rail, but think about it this way.. Planned government infrastructure spending could benefit the economy long term and short-term stimulate recovery. If we can’t make the railways work because of bureaucratic and government disinterest… how are we going to fix the NHS, the broken education system, our broken power infrastructure, the leaking public water utilities (owned by US private equity)? etc etc..

And on that note.. its just over a week till the next Tory premier takes power… My guess is Liz Truss will embark on an all-out series of populist give-aways before an early election. It will probably work because the UK opposition Labour party looks about as organised as a Russian invasion…

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 10:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/HF34yB5 Tyler Durden

UMich Inflation Expectations Ease Further, Consumer Sentiment Bounces Off Record Lows

UMich Inflation Expectations Ease Further, Consumer Sentiment Bounces Off Record Lows

While sentiment should be front-and-center (dragging near record lows), thanks to Fed Chair Powell’s previous comments, all everyone wants to know is what University of Michigan survey respondents think will happen to inflation.

UMICH inflation expectations eased more intra-month from +5.2% in July to +5.0% flash August to +4.8% final August…

Source: Bloomberg

As a reminder, this is the final print for August (after the preliminary data showed a small uptick from record lows).

Away from that component, UMICH headline sentiment was expected to modestly increase in the final print from the flash print and it did with the headline beating expectations…

Source: Bloomberg

Most of this increase was concentrated in expectations, with a 59% surge in the year-ahead outlook for the economy following two months at its lowest reading since the Great Recession

Source: Bloomberg

The gains in sentiment were seen across age, education, income, region, and political affiliation, and can be attributed to the recent deceleration in inflation.

Lower-income consumers, who have fewer resources to buffer against inflation, posted particularly large gains on all index components. Their sentiment now even exceeds that of higher-income consumers, when it typically lags higher-income sentiment by over 15 points.

Finally, while the market will focus on the drop in inflation expectations, here is what UMICH says about the drop: “Uncertainty over expectations rose considerably, particularly among lower-educated consumers.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/26/2022 – 10:08

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/emHQzXn Tyler Durden