Biden Has Released 250,000 Unaccompanied Illegal Immigrant Children Into The US

Biden Has Released 250,000 Unaccompanied Illegal Immigrant Children Into The US

In 2012, Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano rolled out the “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” program, also known as DACA.  Over 800,000 illegal immigrant children (or more) have been blocked from deportation and allowed to remain in the US through the DACA program through 2021.

Donald Trump moved to terminate DACA but the Supreme Court backed immigration advocates in 2020.     

In July 2021, a federal judge ruled that first-time DACA applicants were barred from applying to the program.  All individuals whose DACA requests were approved prior to July 16, 2021 will continue to have DACA status and all DACA requests that were approved before July 16 will continue to be eligible to renew DACA and DACA work permits.

DACA allowed noncitizens who were then under the age of 31 and had entered America before turning 16 years old and before 2007 to request that the government not deport them.  DACA children, also called “DREAMers” for the sake of political optics, were not granted technical citizenship status, but were granted most of the benefits of citizenship anyway, including driver’s licenses, work permits and social security numbers.  In many states this kind of documentation also allows them to vote despite living in the US illegally.   

Even though DACA has been shut down, Joe Biden has allowed over 257,000 illegal minors into the US to be relocated according to recent data from US Customs and Border Protection.  They are not accompanied by parents and are often farmed out to foster or “sponsor” homes across the country.  Keep in mind these are official government stats, which tend to under-report illegal immigration activity.  

Like Obama, Biden has continued to ignore constitutional law on immigration, which says that only Congress is able to determine immigration levels within any given period of time.  

The scheme is rather obvious – Import illegal immigrant children using their age and circumstances as an empathy shield against critics, then keep them in the US so long that it then becomes socially unacceptable to deport them when they are adults.  Thus, they receive de facto citizenship without Congress having a say in the matter because “the poor children,” and leftists buy hundreds of thousands of future voters in the process.  

These unilateral policies have created an epidemic of illegal migrants, especially young children, along US Border states, along with rampant human trafficking and other highly unsavory criminal activities.  Border and refugee agencies have struggled to keep up with the constant arrivals of children, with thousands coming per week setting new records.

 

Open border advocates claim that many of these children are sent into the US alone because they already have family on the other side.  This is nonsense.  In order to apply for asylum or refugee status under DACA or any other immigration program, one of the requirements is that the child has no parent or legal guardian living in America. 

They also claim that the children are exploited in their home countries and this is why they must stay within the US, but there is no evidence to support the notion that the majority of illegal children are escaping exploitation.  What we do know is that if children make these claims they are more likely to receive refugee status and be resettled or get asylum later on.  In other words, the incentives to claim abuse and exploitation are numerous.  The vast majority of DACA children cross the border with no plan and no one to take care of them, with the chance of kidnapping growing each year.  Truly, this must be the act of loving caring parents that want the best for their kids.  

American taxpayers shell out AT LEAST $9.4 billion per year to provide care for illegal migrant children including DACA recipients.  Some estimates indicate that the Biden Administration is spending over $60 million per week to shelter unaccompanied minors.  

And here is perhaps the real reason why parents would send their vulnerable children into the US alone:  Free child care, and potential future citizenship which they can then use to bring more family members into the US later.  The real exploitation of migrant children is often committed by the parents, it’s not something they are running away from. 

The real solution would be to coordinate with the Central and South American governments and send the children straight back to their families.  Denial of legal citizenship for the rest of the parents’ lives as punishment might send a message.  If there are no incentives, the mass migrations will stop.  If these countries will not cooperate, taxes can be raised on imports until they see reason.  But Biden will never do this.          

There is talk among Democrats of instituting DACA 2.0, in order to ensure that the march of child migrants continues for many years to come and the numerous associated problems only get worse.  New measures do not seem to matter though, because Biden is stepping over border laws and encouraging illegal immigration anyway, creating a creeping humanitarian disaster from which there seems to be no escape.   

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 18:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/PgvKebN Tyler Durden

“F**k Wirepoints” Says Chicago Teachers Union When Confronted With Facts From The School District Itself

“F**k Wirepoints” Says Chicago Teachers Union When Confronted With Facts From The School District Itself

Authored by Mark Glennon, founder of Wirepoints.org,

On August 5, Wirepoints’ Matt Rosenberg wrote about empty, failing Chicago Public Schools. The numbers we reported are truly astonishing but they are the school district’s own.

Mike Flannery of FOX 32 Chicago asked the Chicago Teachers Union to join his show to discuss the numbers along with Wirepoints’ Ted Dabrowski.

“F*** Wirepoints,” was the union spokesman’s answer to Flannery. He used the whole word and said his answer was on the record, according to Flannery. The spokesman added nothing more about the numbers and did not join the video segment, which is here at the 8:30 mark, wherein Flannery described the union’s response.

Is the union so confident in its political power that it can respond to legitimate issues in such a manner?

Is that how the union believes Chicago students should be educated to engage in discourse?

Where is the Chicago leadership to address the calamity in its public schools?

Where is the government of the State of Illinois that has full power force reforms but shirks any responsibility?

The numbers we reported almost defy belief. Of CPS’ 478 stand-alone “traditional” schools, one-third of them, 150, are less than half-full, according to the school district. The 20 most empty CPS schools are only 5% to 25% full and most have abysmal educational outcomes, with  proficiency percentages in the single digits.

Manley High School has a capacity of 1,296 students but just 64 students are enrolled. There, 2% are proficient in reading and 1% in math. Just 44 students attend Douglas High School that has a capacity of 888 and their reading and math proficiency are both 0%. The list goes on.

CPS has already lost 100,000 students, or 25% of its enrollment, since 2000 and enrollment is projected to decline by tens of thousands more within a few years.

That’s in a school system that spends an astonishing $28,000 per student to cover the district’s operating, capital and debt costs, a spending number which has doubled since 2013, as we reported earlier.

It’s in a system that graduates 84% of its students though only about a quarter can read or do math at grade level.

And it’s in a system that rates the portion of its teachers as “proficient or excellent” at 100%. That’s correct, 100%.

Those numbers are real, as is the omnipotence of the Chicago Teachers Union, but how one of the world’s formerly leading cities could have let it comes to this seems to defy reality.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 18:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xDaWPlo Tyler Durden

Trump Reportedly Retained Hundreds of Documents That Were Marked As Classified


Officer walks into Mar-a-Lago

This week a reporter asked Attorney General Merrick Garland why the FBI decided it was necessary to search former President Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach resort. “I could tell you why,” Garland replied, “but then I’d have to kill you.”

Although that exchange is entirely imaginary, it encapsulates the puzzle that Americans face as they try to assess the justification for the unprecedented and politically explosive decision to search the home of a former president who is the leading contender to oppose the current president in the next election. That justification, which was based largely on a threat to national security that supposedly required immediate and drastic action, depends on the contents of purloined government documents that we are not allowed to see. While we still know almost nothing about that, we now have a better idea of how many documents in Trump’s trove were marked as classified.

According to a recently released May 10 letter from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran, the 15 boxes that the former president relinquished to NARA in January included “over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages.” Some of those markings indicated “the highest levels of classification, including Special Access Program (SAP) materials.” That discovery prompted the Justice Department to “investigate whether those records were handled in an unlawful manner” and to “conduct an assessment of the potential damage resulting from the apparent manner in which these materials were stored and transported.”

In June, The New York Times reports, “aides to Mr. Trump turned over a few dozen additional sensitive documents” in response to a federal subpoena. After that transaction, the Times says, Corcoran “drafted a statement” that was signed by another Trump lawyer, Christina Bobb, saying that “to the best of her knowledge, all classified material that was there had been returned.”

According to the FBI’s inventory, the August 8 Mar-a-Lago search turned up 11 more sets of classified material with markings ranging from “confidential” to “top secret/SCI” (i.e., “sensitive compartmented information”). The Times says they included “scores of additional documents,” which the FBI found in a basement storage room secured by a padlock and in “a container in a closet in Mr. Trump’s office.”

All told, according to “people briefed on the matter,” the government “has recovered more than 300 documents with classified markings from Mr. Trump since he left office.” On the face of it, that is a pretty large volume of sensitive material, although we still don’t know, even in general terms, why it was classified.

Trump insists that the documents, despite their markings, were no longer classified, because he had “a standing order” as president that automatically declassified anything he happened to remove from the Oval Office. But even if we accept that dubious claim, it does not preclude criminal charges based on the three statutes that the FBI cited in its search warrant.

Assuming that Trump declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago when he still had the authority to do so, that would not matter under 18 USC 2071, which makes it a felony, punishable by up to three years in prison, to conceal, remove, or destroy a U.S. government document. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution has to prove the defendant did that “willfully.”

18 USC 793, the Espionage Act provision that was cited in the warrant, likewise does not mention classification, instead referring to “defense information.” Under that law, someone who “willfully retains” defense information that he “has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” is guilty of a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. According to a search warrant cover sheet that was unsealed last week, the FBI is investigating “willful retention of national defense information.”

The FBI also mentioned 18 USC 1519, which makes it a felony, punishable by up to 20 years in prison, to conceal “any record, document, or tangible object” with the intent to “impede, obstruct, or influence” a federal investigation. Again, that charge does not hinge on whether the records were classified.

The statement from Bobb that the Times describes could support an inference of willfulness or an intent to obstruct. So could the months of protracted negotiations that the NARA letter mentions.

“As you are no doubt aware,” the letter says, “NARA had ongoing communications with the former President’s representatives throughout 2021 about what appeared to be missing Presidential records.” According to the Times, those missing records included “Mr. Trump’s original letters from the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un” and “the note that President Barack Obama had left Mr. Trump before he left office.” They also included Trump’s pardon for Roger Stone, which the FBI found at Mar-a-Lago during this month’s search.

Trump evidently viewed such items as personal mementos. But under the Presidential Records Act, they belonged in the National Archives. That law, enacted in 1978, says “the United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.”

The fact that Trump did not return any records until a year after he left office and even then retained many more, including material marked as classified, could be viewed as evidence that he or his underlings willfully broke the law. But it also could be ascribed to laziness, carelessness, honest mistakes, or a misunderstanding of what the law required.

The same pattern of behavior likewise is consistent with the suspicion that Trump or his representatives deliberately obstructed a federal investigation, but it falls far short of conclusive proof. If a redacted version of the search warrant affidavit is ultimately released, it could clarify the history of communications between the government and Trump’s people, which might shed light on his apparent recalcitrance and therefore the justification for the search.

After the search, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley noted the challenges that prosecutors would face if they decided to pursue charges under the statutes cited by the FBI. “These crimes…require intentional acts,” Turley wrote in The Hill. “With Trump lawyers negotiating the status of the documents and previously turning over some material under subpoena, there is a plausible defense based on Trump’s belief that the material was no longer classified and that his team was cooperating with officials in trying to resolve any disputes. If Trump believed the material was declassified and relied on legal advice to resolve any disagreements, then prosecutors would combine an unprecedented legal case with a heavily contested factual record.”

The post Trump Reportedly Retained Hundreds of Documents That Were Marked As Classified appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/hck8aSJ
via IFTTT

Top Prosecutor On John Durham’s Team Withdraws From Case Against Steele Dossier Source

Top Prosecutor On John Durham’s Team Withdraws From Case Against Steele Dossier Source

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

One of the prosecutors on special counsel John Durham’s team has withdrawn from the team’s upcoming case against a source for the anti-Trump dossier.

Special counsel John Durham arrives at federal court in Washington on May 18, 2022. (Teng Chen/The Epoch Times)

Durham asked the federal court in Alexandria, Virginia on Aug. 21 to “withdraw the appearance” of Andrew DeFilippis, an assistant special counsel, in the case against Igor Danchenko.

Durham referred comment to a spokesperson, who declined to comment on the development. DeFilippis did not return a query.

DeFilippis was one of the prosecutors in the trial of Michael Sussmann, the first trial stemming from Durham’s investigation. Jurors acquitted Sussmann in May of lying to the FBI.

DeFilippis had been involved in the case against Danchenko since shortly after Danchenko was indicted in November 2021.

Durham, a former U.S. attorney appointed as special counsel by former Attorney General William Barr, went to court each day for the Sussmann trial, but did not speak during the proceedings and declined to answer questions after the verdict was handed down.

Durham has signaled he will take a larger role in the case against Danchenko, who has been charged with five counts of lying to the FBI and faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted.

Durham was the lone prosecutor to speak in the most recent hearing, on Aug. 1, and soon after lodged a filing that indicated he will lead the prosecution. Several assistant prosecutors, including Michael Keilty, were present, but DeFilippis was not there.

Keilty and Jonathan Algor are holdovers from the Sussmann trial. Adam Small, who was at the August hearing, did not participate in that case.

The trial is slated to start on Oct. 11 and last five or six days.

Steele Dossier Source

Danchenko, a Russian national who once worked for the Brookings Institution, provided information to Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy who compiled the dossier about then-candidate Donald Trump while being paid by the campaign of Hillary Clinton.

Danchenko falsely told the FBI that he never communicated with a person later identified as Charles Dolan, a longtime Clinton associate, according to charging documents and Dolan’s lawyer. Danchenko is also accused of lying when he said he spoke with a businessman named Sergei Millian and conveyed some of the information he received to Steele.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 17:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/f08AGuY Tyler Durden

Student Loan Forgiveness: A Boost For The Middle And Upper Classes Which Costs $300BN And Raises GDP Only 0.1%

Student Loan Forgiveness: A Boost For The Middle And Upper Classes Which Costs $300BN And Raises GDP Only 0.1%

While it is all too obvious that the Biden admin is rushing to buy as many votes as it can with its latest $10,000 student debt loan forgiveness sceme just two months left until the midterms…

… and thus the move makes sense, if only from a political point of view, one wonders if the White House has evaluated every aspect of this latest mini stimulus meant to benefit the middle and upper classes and push the US much deeper in debt in exchange for a fractional GDP boost? Here’s why:

Back in  2021 when Biden’s plan to forgive anywhere between $10K and $50K in student debt first emerged, Goldman quickly calculated that the proposed debt forgiveness would not benefit the lower class – i.e., those who at least in theory benefit the most from Democrat policies – but the middle and upper classes. 

As Goldman’s Jan Hatzius wrote then, “although over 43 million individuals have federal student loans totaling almost $1.6tn, most federal student debt is held by middle- and upper-income households, and over half—including the vast majority of large debt balances—is held by highly-educated households with a graduate or professional degree (Exhibit 2).”

According to Goldman – and frankly anyone with half a brain – these households likely have significant earning potential (we do not adjust for pervasive laziness or a predisposition to sit on your ass and ruminate rather than actually doing something useful with your life) and are less likely to be resource constrained, so eliminating their loan payments i) might not generate a large spending response and ii) once the peasants realize that their progressive heroes are once again bailing out the rich, the outcry would be a sight to behold.

In any case, soon after it became abundantly clear that Biden’s latest boondoggle would only benefit those who actually can afford to repay debt on their own, the debt forgiveness ploy was quietly shelved… until now, when Democrats are badly lagging in the polls and will pay anything for a vote, certainly $300 billion in new debt… because that’s how much this particular debt forgiveness will cost.

Fast forwarding to today, Goldman economist Alec Phillips reruns his cost benefit analysis and finds a whole lost of costs and virtually no benefit for the broader economy (but certainly benefits to the middle and upper-class individuals whose student debt is about to be trimmed materially). Below we excerpt from Goldman’s note:

Various press reports suggest President Biden will announce a plan to forgive up to $10k in federal student debt for borrowers with incomes of up to $125k. This comes ahead shortly before the current student loan payment pause expires August 31, which the White House also looks likely to extend. While we expected the White House to extend payment deferral, it has been unclear what or when President Biden would decide on student debt. For the last several weeks, prediction markets implied roughly even odds the White House would announce student debt relief this year.

While we have not yet estimated the effects of the plan that the White House looks likely to announce, it appears similar to a potential policy we wrote about shortly after the 2020 election. In that analysis, we found that debt forgiveness of $10k per borrower would discharge around $300bn (1.2% of GDP) of debt but would boost consumption by less than by less than 0.1% of GDP over the year following implementation.

Two policies have changed since that prior analysis:

  • (1) the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) exempted most discharged student debt from tax (discharged debt normally counts as income), which slightly increases the near-term growth effects of student debt relief.
  • (2) The Biden Administration has extended the student loan payment pause several times and appears likely to extend it again, which reduces the near-term impact of debt forgiveness as borrowers’ monthly payments would not change (they would be zero with or without debt forgiveness).

However, neither issue is likely to meaningfully change our estimate that forgiving $10k in student debt per borrower would have a very modest economic effect.

There you have it: virtually no economic benefits, but lots of new debt, and contrary to lies from the White House, only the middle/upper classes benefits.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 17:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/GIRrQO0 Tyler Durden

Republicans Vow To Investigate Fauci Despite Convenient Retirement

Republicans Vow To Investigate Fauci Despite Convenient Retirement

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

After Anthony Fauci announced that he will retire right before the mid term elections, Republicans responded by asserting that his stepping down will not deter them from investigating his role in gain of function research that potentially led to the global COVID pandemic.

“Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic,” tweeted Senator Rand Paul, who has become Fauci’s arch nemesis through repeated questioning of Fauci’s obfuscation of the meaning of gain of function.

“He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak,” Paul further noted.

Paul’s comments come a day after he told reporters “I think most of the mainstream media has kept off of the airwaves a discussion of gain-of-function research or the origins of the virus, but we will get to the bottom of this,”

“It’s going to take control of committees,” Paul further noted, adding “I’ve talked to Jim Jordan and others about investigating this. I think there’s a great deal of interest in investigating the origins of the virus. I’m very interested in it, but it depends on elections. Elections have consequences. We’ll have to see what happens in November.”

In addition to Paul, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, released a press statement on Monday vowing to continue investigating Fauci, stating: “Retirement can’t shield Dr. Fauci from congressional oversight.”

In addition , Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a Monday press release that, “We need answers to many questions around the government’s failed COVID-19 pandemic response, how this pandemic started, and his [Fauci’s] role in supporting taxpayer-funded risky research without proper oversight in China.”

Republican Study Committee chairman Jim Banks also tweeted, “Republicans must remain committed to holding Fauci accountable even after he steps down to make sure no one in his position ever abuses the public trust again.”

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., tweeted that Fauci retiring will not stop Republicans from “holding him accountable.”

Arizona Republican Rep. Andy Biggs slammed Fauci as “a coward” charged he is “conveniently resigning from his position in December before House Republicans have an opportunity to hold him accountable for destroying our country over these past three years.”

The media responses to Fauci’s announcement are telling, with those on the right, including Tucker Carlson denouncing Fauci’s lies over gain of function, and his “megalomania” streak:

On the flip side, Rachel Maddow gushed over Fauci, declaring that he is “a singular figure in American history and in American public service. There has never been anyone else like him, and there never will be again.”

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 16:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/kM07DdB Tyler Durden

WTI Holds Gains After 2nd Large Weekly Draw In A Row

WTI Holds Gains After 2nd Large Weekly Draw In A Row

Oil prices ended higher on the day, despite another Iran-nuke-deal headline (supply) and ugly economic data (demand) as OPEC+ sources confirmed the cartel’s willingness to shift to production cuts in the case of an Iran deal in order to recouple physical and futures markets.

“Oil continues to march higher today as the market digests comments regarding potential cuts from OPEC+,” said Stacey Morris, head of energy research at VettaFi.

“Market observers will also be closely watching US inventory reports to see if the recent strength in gasoline demand has held up.”

Adding further support to prices, Kazakh oil exports may be disrupted for months due to damaged moorings.

API

  • Crude -5.632mm (-3.2mm exp)

  • Cushing +679k

  • Gasoline +268k

  • Distillates +1.05mm

After the prior week’s large crude draw, analysts expected another sizable draw last week and according to API’s report, they are right with a larger than expected 5.632mm barrel draw. Cushing stocks rose and product inventories built…

Source: Bloomberg

WTI was hovering around $93.50 ahead of the API data and limped modestly lower after the print…

In the US, gasoline prices are on their longest run of declines since 2015, potentially easing some of the inflationary pressures on the country’s economy. However, that slide may soon come to an end as wholesale gasoline and crude prices have decoupled higher…

Source: Bloomberg

US diesel prices have fallen for more than 60 days, though that may reserve as demand for the fuel rises in the approach to winter.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 16:39

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/YX20DP6 Tyler Durden

Jim Quinn: The Fading Smile Of A Dying Empire

Jim Quinn: The Fading Smile Of A Dying Empire

Authored by Jim Quinn via The Burning Platform blog,

“All that is human must retrograde if it does not advance.” – Edward Gibbon

“Woe, destruction, ruin, and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day.” – William Shakespeare, Richard II

We moved to our corner of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania twenty-seven years ago. We raised our three boys here. We spent hundreds of hours on local baseball fields, in hockey rinks, in school gyms for basketball games, concerts, plays and donuts-with-dads. It’s still a nice place to live, with virtually no crime, decent roads, and reasonable property tax rates. But I would have to say there has been a degradation in the overall quality of life in my community, which is consistent with the downward spiral of our society in general. When we planted our roots in this community it was still more farm-like than suburban. Family farms and open space were more prevalent than housing tracts, strip malls, fast food joints and cookie cutter commercial buildings. A beautiful farmhouse a few miles from our home, freshly painted white, proudly displayed the iconic yellow smiley face. It symbolized good times.

We’ve been driving on this road for twenty-seven years on the way to baseball games, hockey practices, the car dealer for service, and lately to our gym, as we try to fend off father time.  Driving by that barn in the early days would always brighten your day. A bright yellow smiley face against a white background represented a positive, happy view of the world.

We moved to this area in 1995 while Clinton was president, unemployment was 5.6%, CPI was 2.8%, GDP growth was 2.7%, the annual deficit was $164 billion, the national debt was $4.9 trillion, the Fed balance sheet was $500 billion, the U.S. population was 263 million, total household debt was $4 trillion, you earned 5.5% on your money market fund, the U.S. bailed out Mexico, the Oklahoma City bombing happened, and OJ Simpson was found not guilty of killing his ex-wife. The military industrial complex was being starved by lack of wars and the stock market soared by 33% as the beginning of irrational exuberance began under the reign of Greenspan and his Put.

A lot has happened over the last twenty-seven years and the faded, barely visible smiley face, on a now mold ridden decaying barn, is truly representative of a society, culture and economic system dying a slow torturous death, as apathy, technological distraction, myopic indolence, and the greed of powerful elites combine to ensure the eventual collapse of the short-lived American Empire. Much of this quarter century of decline is borne out in the change in economic numbers noted above.

The unemployment rate is reported as 3.5% today with 158 million out of 264 million working age adults employed. That leaves 106 million not employed, or 40% of working age adults not working. Back in 1995, 125 million out of 199 million working age adults were employed, leaving 74 million not working. Over a quarter century we’ve added 65 million people to our population, but only 33 million to the employment rolls. Either we’ve devolved into a nation of freeloaders on welfare/disability, or the BLS is lying about the 3.5% unemployment rate, or both.

The BLS currently tries to convince the ignorant masses inflation is only 8.5%, up tremendously from the 2.8% in 1995. Since the Fed/Wall Street induced financial crash of 2008, the government had been reporting inflation of between 0% to 3%, when in reality, as measured the way it was measured in 1980, it had been between 7% to 10%. Today’s actual inflation rate is 17% in case you were wondering. Revealing the true cost of living to the peasants might induce a revolting outcome for our overlords. The government prefers to treat the math challenged masses like mushrooms, by keeping them in the dark.

The corrupt Fed, feckless politicians, media mouthpieces for the empire, and Wall Street shysters were shocked I tell you by skyrocketing inflation after the Fed increased their balance sheet from $3.7 trillion to $8.9 trillion and the D.C. swamp creatures increased the national debt from $23.2 trillion to $30.7 trillion since the beginning of 2020. This generated inflation in financial assets for the global elite and their minions, while destroying the finances of the middle and lower classes. The rot grows like a cancer in this empire of debt.

The annual deficit of $164 billion in 1995 was racked up in 17 days in 2021. We have run annual deficits of $3.1 trillion in 2020 and $2.8 trillion in 2021, and the scumbags in Washington just keep passing $700 billion spending bills, writing off student loan debts for gender fluidity majors and sending billions in weapons to the most corrupt regime on the planet – Ukraine. The degradation and downward trajectory of this empire of debt, delusion and despair can be most clearly defined by comparing our GDP growth since 1995 to the growth of debt by both our government and the populace. Total U.S. GDP in 1995 totaled $7.6 trillion and today checks in at $24.8 trillion. That is a growth of 326% over twenty-seven years. The national debt has grown by 626%. Seems unsustainable, but why question our glorious leaders.

The Fed balance sheet has grown by 1,780%. Household debt has grown by 400%. Median household income in 1995 was $34,000. Today it is $73,000. That is a 214% increase over 27 years. With real inflation averaging between 5% and 10% per year during this time frame, average working Americans have seen their standard of living methodically decline, replacing the income with debt. The only beneficiaries of debt are the banking cabal and the mega-corporations selling their cheap Chinese crap to clueless dupes who believe driving a leased BMW and living in a cookie cutter McMansion with an $800,000 mortgage makes them wealthy.

The selfie generation is too distracted checking in on Facebook, posting pictures of their food on Instagram, doing a dance routine on Tik Tok or counting their likes on Twitter to realize how badly they’ve been screwed over by those pulling the strings of this society. The propaganda and psychology of fear utilized by the powerful interests has reached a level that would make Edward Bernays burst with pride, as manipulating the masses to believe falsehoods is a key requirement in implementing their Great Reset agenda.

This entire charade seems to be bursting at the seams, with raging inflation, a recession in process (despite Biden’s lackeys trying to redefine recession), a Green New Deal Great Reset agenda purposely creating energy and food shortages, government agencies running roughshod over the Constitution, and a tyrannical administration attempting to crush their political adversaries using any means necessary. Smiles are fading as we head into either a hyperinflationary depression or a deflationary depression, with some world war mixed in.

The economic decay is easily provable, but our cultural and societal degeneration has exceeded our economic deterioration. Just as the Roman Empire exhibited particular traits of a dying culture, the American Empire displays similar characteristics, such as: concern with displaying affluence instead of building wealth; obsession with sex and perversions of sex; art becoming freakish and sensationalistic instead of creative and original; widening disparity between very rich and very poor; increased demand to live off the state.

Of course, our dying culture has also been turbocharged by the climate cult attempting to destroy our fossil fueled economic system by purposely sabotaging our energy and food systems as the driving force for their Great Reset. Weaponizing the annual flu as a means to inject billions of people with a DNA altering, sometimes lethal, concoction is part of Bill Gates’ depopulation agenda. They have taken the sex and gender perversion to new levels of child abuse, grooming and mutilation. The rampant pedophilia and child trafficking by the global elitists is the most despicable aspect of our cultural degeneracy. Anyone with a conscious can no longer be proud of this country and should be desperately concerned about its future.

“A growing sense of unease presently pervades the American consciousness. Americans are no longer as confident in their nation and self-assured as they once were. A sense of frustration and anger underscores American consciousness. Americans are looking over our shoulder at other emerging economic juggernauts and wondering if we can still be world’s social, political, and economic leader when Congress cannot even manage to balance the national budget. The thought that we are diminishing in stature in the eyes of the international community constantly torments Americans. Faded glory strikes a crippling blow to the American psyche. Analogous to an aging beauty queen, America might still possess a golden crown, but she lost her luster. In an eroding empire, Americans feel like second-class citizens in the union of nations.” ― Kilroy J. Oldster

The terms modern and progress have become warped and used as an excuse for destroying localization, small businesses, what worked, what was good, and what benefitted society, replacing it with globalization, mega-corporations, complex technology, profits at any cost, and benefits accumulating to the few with suffering borne by the many. Two examples come to mind within a few miles from my home. Just a couple miles from the fading smile barn is a property that was once a thriving family farm. I snapped a picture last week as I was driving past.

The decaying abandoned farmhouse, dilapidated barn, and rusting farm machinery are being engulfed by weeds, as the memories of a productive useful family farm fade like that yellow smiley face. I don’t know why it was abandoned, but I’m sure the corporate farming conglomerates and the corporate meat processing plants were a major factor. When you can buy cheap meat at Wal-Mart produced in China or some industrial farm, why pay a little more for fresh non-GMO meat sold by a local farmer?

Gone are the roadside vegetable stands and buying fresh meat from your local farmer neighbor. Maybe the patriarch of the homestead got too old, and his sons had been indoctrinated by the government schools to get corporate jobs in some of the commercial office campuses that have replaced open space and farmland. Whatever the reason, it provokes melancholy about a better simpler time whenever I pass by.

The governmental actions taken in the early 2000s still irk me to this day. The area around the intersection of Forty Foot Road and Sumneytown Pike in the late 1990s was still reminiscent of simpler times, before smart phones, hyper-consumerism, and proliferation of big box retail. Small businesses were important and viable. There was a family run diner near the turnpike entrance where all the locals ate breakfast and talked sports and politics.

Township police were friendly, driving older basic vehicles and housed in a small unassuming one-story township building. Nicely kept older homes lined one side of Forty Foot Road and the other side was an eclectic mixture of old-time baseball fields, with no lights and little to no ground’s maintenance, and the old Henry Sprecht grade school, built in 1909 to honor a long-time educator and local historian, which had been replaced by newer schools and creatively repurposed into a quaint antiques mall.

We spent many a summer evening watching my oldest son play little league baseball on those fields while trying to keep our four-year-old and three-year-old sons from getting into trouble. We loved wandering through that antiques mall as individual vendors selling all manner of antiques, hand crafted woodwork, baseball cards, toys, occupied nooks, and crannies in this ancient school. We bought a handcrafted cabinet by a local artisan for our kitchen, which we still employ today in our storage area.

My fondest memory was at Christmas time when it would become a Christmas wonderland and I would take the boys there to see the spectacular miniature train show, where local train aficionados would set up amazing displays. The kids were mesmerized. There was also a family-owned home center in Hatfield called Snyder’s that sold everything for your home and also had a great train display at Christmas for kids to enjoy. All this unpretentious delight ended abruptly in the early 2000s, as progress, commercialization, and greed took hold of the country and our little community.

As you may remember, Greenspan coined the term irrational exuberance in 1996 to describe financial markets, then turbocharged stocks by cutting rates, causing the dot.com bubble and responded to the stock market crash by cutting rates and causing the biggest real estate bubble in history, until now. These ephemeral paper riches caused local government bureaucrats to use phantom tax revenues to envision delusions of grandeur by building useless unnecessary projects.

This is exactly what the government drones running Towamencin Township did. They produced a grand master plan, gave it a fancy name, spent tens of millions of our tax dollars, and produced an embarrassing mess. They used eminent domain to acquire homes, forced the dozens of small business owners out of the antique mall and flattened the building, closed off the baseball fields to little kids, and closed Forty Foot Road for over a year to build a glorious $13 million bridge to nowhere. This bridge stands as a tribute to all those Chinese ghost cities, as it serves no purpose except as an example of government incompetence, wastefulness, and misuse of taxpayer funds with no consequences for the government drones.

Rather than wait for actual retail tenants to sign on to their glorious project, the government geniuses built the bridge knowing they would come. They never came. The real estate retail bubble popped. It’s now fifteen years later and those four baseball fields are still sitting there, untouched, undeveloped, and unused. They stuck a Walgreens where the charming antique mall once sat. No pedestrians cross the pedestrian bridge because there is nothing on either side. A four- story commercial building was built on spec a block from the bridge and stood vacant for five years.

The family-owned Snyder’s home store was driven out of business by the Home Depot and Lowes built within a few miles. There are now cookie cutter townhouses where Snyder’s stood. Another successful retail center in the 1990s up the road, anchored by a family owned Genuardi supermarket and a Sears Hardware, along with a pizza place, drugstore, Blockbuster, and kids play center has been vacant and rotting for over a decade, as bankruptcies, mergers, and the relentless downward economic spiral made it untenable.

In addition to wasting taxpayer money on the ghost bridge to nowhere, these financial government geniuses decided their police station built in 1975 no longer met the needs of their fast-growing police force in a township with no crime, because it is 88% white/Asian. They built themselves a complex three times the size of their old station. Lucky, because they now have a police force of 23 officers, all decked out with souped-up brand-new SUVs.

You need that level of manpower and firepower for all those speed traps, fender benders and writing tickets for illegal basketball nets. There hasn’t been a major crime in Towamencin in over a decade, but the taxpayers pay over $1 million per year to be harassed and pay for their donut budget This level of government waste is happening in every locality and state in America. And the Feds put them all to shame with their corrupt, wasteful, traitorous spending, bribing, and war mongering across the globe, to the tune of trillions.

The decline I’ve personally seen in my local community is not just a localized cancer but has metastasized across the land and around the globe. As our economic system accelerates towards inevitable implosion, either as a planned demolition or due to the hubris of central bankers, the fraying social fabric of our civilized society is unmistakable, as the moral state of our country has deteriorated to a level seen only in debauched empires on the brink of failure.

The global elite and their moral depravity have engulfed the world, as their ravenous greed, insatiable appetite for dominion over the masses, immoral deceit, manipulative use of propaganda, and satanic decadence have created economic, social, political, and military distress across the globe. As Toynbee and Solzhenitsyn note, the lack of morality and courage among those who profess to be leaders has permeated throughout society, leading to a dearth of citizens taking civic responsibility for the path of the country.

“Of the twenty-two civilizations that have appeared in history, nineteen of them collapsed when they reached the moral state the United States is in now.”
― Arnold Joseph Toynbee

“A decline in courage may be the most striking feature that an outside observer notices in the West today. The Western world has lost its civic courage. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling and intellectual elite, causing an impression of a loss of courage by the entire society.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn

We are a lost society, ruled by emotions, captured by technology, misinformed, uneducated, indifferent, fearful, passively accepting of whatever government and media tell them is true, and entranced by materialism funded by debt. We are a sick dying culture where common community standards, self-responsibility, hard work, kindness, and manners have been superseded by the worship of abnormality, celebration of degeneracy, living off the government, spreading hatred, and waging undeclared wars across the world.

There is an empty shallowness to our civilization, with the vacuum filled with gadgets, pathetic displays of fake affluence, trivialities like social media, and superficial displays of virtue signaling regarding the latest woke craze shoved down our throats by those controlling the levers of society. There is an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness, fear, and foreboding mood of impending doom, as this Fourth Turning accelerates towards its bloody denouement.

The aura of pessimism about the future and fear that our superpower status, only in existence since 1946, is rotting from within permeates the psychology of those actually willing to think critically and see what is really happening. The existing social order will be extinguished during the waning years of this Fourth Turning. We are in the interval between the decay of the old and formation of the new, whatever that may be.

This transition will be one of uncertainty, turmoil, miscalculation, fanatical misrepresentations, war (civil & global), false prophets, bloodshed, and clear winners and losers. Decay and death of empires have happened for centuries and are necessary to expunge the excesses and abuses which always occur as empires expand and its leaders exhibit a hubristic arrogance towards their people and the world.

“Just as floods replenish soil and fires rejuvenate forests, a Fourth Turning clears out society’s exhausted elements and creates an opportunity.” – The Fourth Turning

It is hard to believe the prognostications of Strauss & Howe a quarter century ago, just after I moved to my community, could be so eerily accurate. But, when you are sure of the catalysts: debt, global disorder, and civic decay, the volcanic eruption of distress can only flow along certain channels, preordained by choices made over decades by our leaders and ourselves.

“Imagine some national (and probably global) volcanic eruption, initially flowing along channels of distress that were created during the Unraveling era and further widened by the catalyst. Trying to foresee where the eruption will go once it bursts free of the channels is like trying to predict the exact fault line of an earthquake. All you know in advance is something about the molten ingredients of the climax, which could include the following:

  • Economic distress, with public debt in default, entitlement trust funds in bankruptcy, mounting poverty and unemployment, trade wars, collapsing financial markets, and hyperinflation (or deflation)

  • Social distress, with violence fueled by class, race, nativism, or religion and abetted by armed gangs, underground militias, and mercenaries hired by walled communities

  • Political distress, with institutional collapse, open tax revolts, one-party hegemony, major constitutional change, secessionism, authoritarianism, and altered national borders

  • Military distress, with war against terrorists or foreign regimes equipped with weapons of mass destruction” 

This Fourth Turning has created tremendous distress in all four categories noted by Strauss & Howe.

With over $200 trillion of unfunded liabilities, the country is already in default, but unwilling to admit it. The Social Security fund will run out of money in a few years. State and local pension funds are underfunded by trillions. With Powell and his minions in control, hyperinflation and deflationary depression are on the near-term horizon, with financial assets crashing once again, for the fourth time this century.

The social distress has been initiated and promoted by the global elite through their complete control of the media propaganda outlets. They are attempting to spur violent upheaval, as this will give them the excuse to disarm and electronically imprison dissenters and Great Reset resisters. Class, race, religion, and gender are all being used to stoke unrest.

The political distress is the biggest gaping wound in our national body today. If critical thinking individuals didn’t acknowledge the existence of a Deep State before, they surely can’t deny its existence now. It has existed for decades, but has been forced out into the open, as threats to their power and control multiply due to their arrogance, ineptitude, wickedness, and avarice.

Anyone who dares to deviate from their directives and threatens their fiefdom is either killed, neutered, or destroyed (JFK, RFK, George Wallace, Perot, Assange, Trump). Russiagate, two impeachments, J6 witch trial, and now the rogue DOJ/FBI raid on Trump’s compound has driven the political stress to heights not seen since 1860. The desires of the globalist elites for a Great Reset into a new world order where you own nothing, and they own everything is the goal of all this engineered chaos.

The military distress may be the most concerning and potentially most destructive aspect of this Fourth Turning as we enter the normally bloody phase. The flailing U.S. empire is provoking and stoking global conflict to keep feeding the Deep State military industrial complex. The Ukraine conflict was initiated by the U.S. in 2014 and is being used as a justification to fight Russia without getting our hands dirty.

Continuing to poke the nuclear armed bear, has the potential to escalate the conflict to a point of no return. Throwing fuel on the fire by provoking China over Taiwan’s independence is irrationally reckless and the mark of a desperate empire seeing the sun setting on its 76-year reign as the one global superpower, and willing to risk global war in a fruitless effort to remain king.

The U.S. can let its empire expire with a whimper (e.g. British Empire) or a bang. Based on their ham-handed, stumbling, absurd endeavors to maintain their dominance over the world, they have initiated global food and energy shortages, caused unbearable economic hardship upon the middle and lower classes, and have pushed the world to the brink of nuclear war with countries run by serious men. While we are supposedly led by an ancient fossil lost in a fog of dementia and unable to string two coherent sentences together, even with a teleprompter. Obama, the Deep State, and a plethora of diversity hire apparatchiks are really calling the shots.

The smile has faded on this empire of debt, delusion, denial, and destruction, just as it has on the barn near my house. The coming trials will require levels of courage, fortitude, and sacrifice which many might think they are not capable of summoning, but we have no choice. You can’t sit out Fourth Turnings. Sides will need to be chosen and life or death decisions made. The future of this country and the world hang in the balance.

Choosing your allies and forming local communities of like-minded people with the skills to survive and thrive in the world created after the coming conflict is resolved, is all you can do at this point. Preparation may not be enough, but not preparing guarantees a bad outcome for you and your family. Whatever you do, put absolutely no faith in any government solution to our predicament. They are the enemy and you can’t vote your way out of this.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/23/2022 – 16:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gLwfjH4 Tyler Durden

Trump Reportedly Retained Hundreds of Documents That Were Marked As Classified


Officer walks into Mar-a-Lago

This week a reporter asked Attorney General Merrick Garland why the FBI decided it was necessary to search former President Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach resort. “I could tell you why,” Garland replied, “but then I’d have to kill you.”

Although that exchange is entirely imaginary, it encapsulates the puzzle that Americans face as they try to assess the justification for the unprecedented and politically explosive decision to search the home of a former president who is the leading contender to oppose the current president in the next election. That justification, which was based largely on a threat to national security that supposedly required immediate and drastic action, depends on the contents of purloined government documents that we are not allowed to see. While we still know almost nothing about that, we now have a better idea of how many documents in Trump’s trove were marked as classified.

According to a recently released May 10 letter from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran, the 15 boxes that the former president relinquished to NARA in January included “over 100 documents with classification markings, comprising more than 700 pages.” Some of those markings indicated “the highest levels of classification, including Special Access Program (SAP) materials.” That discovery prompted the Justice Department to “investigate whether those records were handled in an unlawful manner” and to “conduct an assessment of the potential damage resulting from the apparent manner in which these materials were stored and transported.”

In June, The New York Times reports, “aides to Mr. Trump turned over a few dozen additional sensitive documents” in response to a federal subpoena. After that transaction, the Times says, Corcoran “drafted a statement” that was signed by another Trump lawyer, Christina Bobb, saying that “to the best of her knowledge, all classified material that was there had been returned.”

According to the FBI’s inventory, the August 8 Mar-a-Lago search turned up 11 more sets of classified material with markings ranging from “confidential” to “top secret/SCI” (i.e., “sensitive compartmented information”). The Times says they included “scores of additional documents,” which the FBI found in a basement storage room secured by a padlock and in “a container in a closet in Mr. Trump’s office.”

All told, according to “people briefed on the matter,” the government “has recovered more than 300 documents with classified markings from Mr. Trump since he left office.” On the face of it, that is a pretty large volume of sensitive material, although we still don’t know, even in general terms, why it was classified.

Trump insists that the documents, despite their markings, were no longer classified, because he had “a standing order” as president that automatically declassified anything he happened to remove from the Oval Office. But even if we accept that dubious claim, it does not preclude criminal charges based on the three statutes that the FBI cited in its search warrant.

Assuming that Trump declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago when he still had the authority to do so, that would not matter under 18 USC 2071, which makes it a felony, punishable by up to three years in prison, to conceal, remove, or destroy a U.S. government document. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution has to prove the defendant did that “willfully.”

18 USC 793, the Espionage Act provision that was cited in the warrant, likewise does not mention classification, instead referring to “defense information.” Under that law, someone who “willfully retains” defense information that he “has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” is guilty of a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. According to a search warrant cover sheet that was unsealed last week, the FBI is investigating “willful retention of national defense information.”

The FBI also mentioned 18 USC 1519, which makes it a felony, punishable by up to 20 years in prison, to conceal “any record, document, or tangible object” with the intent to “impede, obstruct, or influence” a federal investigation. Again, that charge does not hinge on whether the records were classified.

The statement from Bobb that the Times describes could support an inference of willfulness or an intent to obstruct. So could the months of protracted negotiations that the NARA letter mentions.

“As you are no doubt aware,” the letter says, “NARA had ongoing communications with the former President’s representatives throughout 2021 about what appeared to be missing Presidential records.” According to the Times, those missing records included “Mr. Trump’s original letters from the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un” and “the note that President Barack Obama had left Mr. Trump before he left office.” They also included Trump’s pardon for Roger Stone, which the FBI found at Mar-a-Lago during this month’s search.

Trump evidently viewed such items as personal mementos. But under the Presidential Records Act, they belonged in the National Archives. That law, enacted in 1978, says “the United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.”

The fact that Trump did not return any records until a year after he left office and even then retained many more, including material marked as classified, could be viewed as evidence that he or his underlings willfully broke the law. But it also could be ascribed to laziness, carelessness, honest mistakes, or a misunderstanding of what the law required.

The same pattern of behavior likewise is consistent with the suspicion that Trump or his representatives deliberately obstructed a federal investigation, but it falls far short of conclusive proof. If a redacted version of the search warrant affidavit is ultimately released, it could clarify the history of communications between the government and Trump’s people, which might shed light on his apparent recalcitrance and therefore the justification for the search.

After the search but before the warrant and inventory were unsealed, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley noted the challenges that prosecutors would face if they decided to pursue charges under the statutes cited by the FBI. “These crimes…require intentional acts,” Turley wrote in The Hill. “With Trump lawyers negotiating the status of the documents and previously turning over some material under subpoena, there is a plausible defense based on Trump’s belief that the material was no longer classified and that his team was cooperating with officials in trying to resolve any disputes. If Trump believed the material was declassified and relied on legal advice to resolve any disagreements, then prosecutors would combine an unprecedented legal case with a heavily contested factual record.”

The post Trump Reportedly Retained Hundreds of Documents That Were Marked As Classified appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/hck8aSJ
via IFTTT

Gavin Newsom Vetoes Bill Legalizing ‘Safe Consumption Sites’ in 3 California Cities


Gov. Gavin Newsom speaking, wearing a navy blue quarter-zip sweater

On Monday, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill legalizing “safe consumption sites” in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland. Safe consumption sites, also known as “safe injection sites,” are locations where individuals can use illegal drugs in a sanitary area with access to clean needles and staff who can administer drugs like naloxone, which can quickly treat an overdose. Proponents of the legislation argue that the sites are an important harm reduction tool, helping to prevent overdose deaths or the spread of certain diseases, like HIV, that can be spread through intravenous drug use.

“Safe injection sites aren’t intended to be some sort of magic solution to a chronic drug addiction crisis; they are intended to reduce the likelihood of users dying,” Reason’s Scott Shackford wrote after the bill’s passage in the state Legislature earlier this month.

Where safe consumption sites are legal, they have proved tremendously effective. As of 2019, one safe consumption site in Vancouver, Canada, has overseen more than 3.6 million instances of drug injection since its opening in 2003. At the site, staff responded to 6,440 overdoses with no deaths. A study examining the site’s operations from 2004 to 2008 predicted that, during that period, the site prevented up to 51 deaths. According to NPR, researchers also found no increase in drug usage in the surrounding area.

“Safe consumption sites have been in operation around the world for approximately 30 years, with great success and literally zero overdose deaths,” state Sen. Scott Wiener (D–San Francisco), who originally introduced the bill, told CBS Bay Area. “These sites are a proven strategy to reduce overdose deaths, pressure on emergency rooms, and public drug use, while expanding access to drug treatment”

However, Newsom seems unconvinced that safe consumption sites will help the state’s drug users. “I have long supported the cutting edge of harm reduction strategies,” Newsom wrote in a statement explaining his veto of the bill. “However, I am acutely concerned about the operations of safe injection sites without strong, engaged local leadership, and well-documented, vetted, and thoughtful operational and suitability plans.” Newsom further expressed concerns that the bill could lead to “a world of unintended consequences… worsening drug consumption challenges in [Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland] is not a risk we can take.”

“It’s tremendously frustrating that safe injection sites have met continued resistance at the federal and state levels, including in supposedly liberal states like California,” Geoffroy Lawrence, the managing director of drug policy at Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this website), tells Reason. “While safe injection sites may sound counterintuitive to some people as an effective means to combat addiction, there’s no arguing with the data. Results from other countries have shown that safe injection sites lead to a reduction in overdose deaths and transmission rates of infectious disease and an increase in the number of individuals seeking addiction recovery.”

It is possible that Newsom’s veto of the bill has little to do with the efficacy of safe injection sites and instead is the result of his preparation for a possible presidential run in 2024. On July 4, he placed political ads on several Florida television stations, criticizing Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, also a possible presidential contender. With cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles gaining attention in national media for their homelessness crisis (which is associated with drug use), Newsom could be eager to present a more anti-drug, even “tough on crime” image.

Newsom’s presidential ambitions, or simply his desire to appear less soft on crime, might be getting in the way of a safe and effective public health strategy for preventing drug overdoses.

“The American approach to the drug war has historically been about restricting supply when changing demand was always the better approach,” said Lawrence. “That’s what so-called ‘harm reduction’ policies, including safe injection sites, are all about.”

The post Gavin Newsom Vetoes Bill Legalizing 'Safe Consumption Sites' in 3 California Cities appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/kuc5FdH
via IFTTT