How Should Libertarians Think About Ron DeSantis?


rondesantis

No governor is more cheered and hated right now than Florida Republican Ron DeSantis, currently in the news for flying around 50 Venezuelan migrants to Martha’s Vineyard to own the libs. The 44-year-old Navy veteran and double-Ivy-Leaguer also headlined the third National Conservatism Conference, where he emphasized that the state should punish and reward businesses and individuals based on political positions.

Controversially, DeSantis has yanked longstanding tax breaks for Walt Disney Corporation after the company criticized his stance on gay rights, signed legislation that would limit social media platforms’ ability to moderate content and users (the law has been blocked by a federal court), banned mask mandates in public schools, and issued an executive order prohibiting businesses from requiring proof of vaccination from customers. He’s also pushed cities such as Gainesville to abandon zoning reform aimed at creating more diverse, multi-family housing.

If such top-down edicts seem at odds with traditional conservative support for local decision making and letting businesses act however they want, DeSantis has also gotten high marks for mostly keeping K-12 schools open during the pandemic and overseeing a boom in people moving to Florida to escape lockdowns elsewhere. When COVID death rates are adjusted for the age of residents, Florida’s rate (275 per 100,000) draws close to California’s (267 per 100,000), while both are below the national average (302 per 100,000).  He’s a strong supporter of gun rights and signed a $1.2 billion tax break package this spring, promising even more cuts if he gets reelected in November. Despite increased levels of spending each year of his governorship, the state is currently sitting on a $22 billion budget surplus.

So how should libertarians think about Ron DeSantis? Is he “a retaliatory culture warrior” and the leading indicator of an “authoritarian convergence” of the right and left? Or is he a successful large-state governor, the future of the Republican party, and, quite possibly, the next president of the United States? How should libertarians think about his mix of bullying and bravura that is turning the Sunshine State from a joke to one of the hottest destinations in the country?

I recently hosted a conversation about DeSantis and Florida with two recent blue-state refugees: Reason Senior Producer Zach Weissmueller, who pulled up stakes in California, and New York Post columnist Karol Markowicz, who hightailed it out of New York.

The post How Should Libertarians Think About Ron DeSantis? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/shNY2tn
via IFTTT

Bonds, Stocks, Bitcoin, & Bullion Soar After Brits ‘Save The World’

Bonds, Stocks, Bitcoin, & Bullion Soar After Brits ‘Save The World’

First one to ‘pivot’ wins?

The Bank of England’s desperate bailout of its pension funds – by pivoting back to QE (only temporarily of course) – sparked chaotic buying across global markets. Bonds were the most dramatic movers, but FX swings were sizable, and stocks, gold, crypto, and oil all ripped on the renewed easing efforts.

First the scene of the crime… UK 30Y Gilt yields collapsed (-106bps) after BoE intervention…

Source: Bloomberg

US Treasury yields followed suit with the belly of the curve plunging over 25bps, erasing all the week’s yield increase…

Source: Bloomberg

10Y yields reversed perfectly at 4.00% coincidentally, puking over 32bps from high to low intraday – this was the biggest daily drop in 10Y yields since 2009

Source: Bloomberg

Expectations for rate-hikes are dropping (Terminal rate now down 40bps from its peak), but today saw subsequent rate-cuts on the rise once again…

Source: Bloomberg

…with EDZ2-H3 negative again (implying a rate cut in Q1 of next year)…

Source: Bloomberg

Additionally, as rate-cut expectations begin to rise again, we saw another large options trade betting on a huge rate-cut in Q1 (around 100bps).

As rate trajectory expectations shifted dovishly so the Dollar Index tumbled

Source: Bloomberg

But cable rallied, despite BoE’s actions…

Source: Bloomberg

Crypto rallied on the day – after yesterday’s massive roller coaster – with bitcoin back above $19,000…

Source: Bloomberg

European stocks spiked on the news, then faded, then rallied into their cash close to end slightly green (FTSE-250 was unchanged after being down 3% early in the session)…

Source: Bloomberg

US futures were notably lower overnight before the Brits ‘saved the world’, then spiked green, trod water, then soared after the cash open. Small Cap rose over 3.5% on the day and were up over 5% from overnight lows. The rest of the majors rallied 3.5-4% off overnight lows. Some profit-taking at the close wiped a little lipstick off…

On the heels of a massive short squeeze today…

Source: Bloomberg

VIX crashed back from almost 35 to almost 30.00…

Spot Gold spiked back above $1660…

Source: Bloomberg

WTI surged back above $81…

Notably, US retail gas prices at the pump are up 8 straight days…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, we note one of the market’s most important ‘stress’ indicators is flashing red…

Source: Bloomberg

This is happening as a record $2.37 trillion was lodged with The Fed for o/n repo.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 16:01

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/IxN7cRd Tyler Durden

Locomotive Machinists, Mechanics Reach New Deal With Railroads

Locomotive Machinists, Mechanics Reach New Deal With Railroads

By Joanna Marsh of FreightWaves

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) District 19 has reached a new tentative agreement with the group representing the freight railroads in contract negotiations.

This agreement tweaks one that IAM rejected earlier this month. IAM represents locomotive machinists, track equipment mechanics and facility maintenance personnel at the freight railroads represented by the National Carriers Conference Committee (NCCC).

“Throughout this process of seeking a new contract, you have stood strong and demanded the fair treatment you deserve from the carriers,” IAM said in a Tuesday notice to members. “Your solidarity and strength have made national headlines and, most importantly, given your District 19 negotiating team the power we need at the negotiating table to make the carriers listen to your needs.”

According to IAM, highlights of the agreement include a cap on health care costs; codified language regarding travel costs for roadway mechanics; further bargaining over travel expenses and per diem; and plans to conduct a joint study on overtime, forced overtime policies and overtime meal options. 

The new agreement also includes other provisions from the original one, including a 24% compounded general wage increase, a $5,000 service recognition bonus and full retroactive pay, among other provisions. The new agreement also has a “me-too” clause in which IAM rail division members could receive the same terms that another union might secure in its agreement. 

IAM will send the agreement to its nearly 5,000 members for approval. A cooling-off period during which members cannot legally strike will be in effect through Dec. 9, and “in the meantime, we continue to work with coalition partners to secure the best deal possible.” The December date also puts IAM District 19 members back on schedule with many other rail unions, IAM said.

“As always, IAM District 19 members will have the final say in this improved Tentative Agreement. Ratification vote details will be shared with every member soon. The IAM District 19 Leadership Team will soon be visiting shops from coast to coast and looks forward to answering your questions,” IAM said.

NCCC confirmed that this second agreement implements the recommendations of the Presidential Emergency Board (PEB), the third-party, three-person board appointed by President Joe Biden to find conditions that both the unions and the railroads could agree upon as they negotiated a new labor agreement. 

Those recommendations include a 24% wage increase during the five-year period from 2020 through 2024 — with a 14.1% wage increase effective immediately — and five annual $1,000 lump-sum payments, NCCC said.

“With today’s announcement, all unions in the national bargaining round have ratified or are in the process of ratifying new collective bargaining agreements,” NCCC said, providing a link to the status of all pending ratification votes.

A new labor deal for union members has been in the works since January 2020, but negotiations between the unions and the railroads failed to progress. A federal mediation board took up the negotiations but released the parties from those efforts earlier this summer. 

The PEB convened in July and August to come up with ways that the unions and railroads could resolve the impasse and issued recommendations last month. The recommendations were meant to serve as a jumping-off point for a new contract.

Two of the largest labor unions — those representing locomotive engineers and train conductors — were the last to reach a tentative agreement with the railroads. Their agreement averted a strike that could have begun as early as Sept. 16.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 15:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/1XbwIlV Tyler Durden

Biden Draining SPR Like “Campaign Credit Card” For Midterms

Biden Draining SPR Like “Campaign Credit Card” For Midterms

President Biden’s reckless draining of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is nothing more than an election-year gimmick akin to using a ‘credit card’ to buy votes, according to Tim Stewart, president of the US Oil and Gas Association.

According to data from the Department of Energy, stocks of crude oil in the SPR hit their lowest levels since 1984 for the week ending Sept. 16.

“This is the first time in history, honestly, that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has been used as a campaign credit card to buy down political risk for the midterms,” Stewart told Just the News.

“Let me put it in perspective if I could,” he continued. “At the current rate, the U.S. is selling more oil out of its emergency reserves than the production of most medium-sized OPEC countries like Algeria or Angola. We’re selling twice as much per day than we’re producing out of Alaska. That puts us somewhere between Exxon and Conoco in terms of … the impact we’re having on the daily supply — and this is happening without new oil going into replace it.”

The conversation then turned to ‘energy expert’ Hunter Biden, who host John Solomon asked for Stewart’s reaction to “the idea that the president’s son … could be working behind the scenes quietly to take our great energy wealth, send it over to China, while the boss, the president, the ‘Big Guy’ that they refer to in the documents, he’s trying to lower our reliance [on fossil fuels] and keep us from using our energy wealth here.”

Stewart, who noted that the oil and gas trading industry is “very, very complex,” replied: “I’ve been in this business for 25 years or so. And I can tell you, I am no more qualified to be a trader or a broker than an influence-peddling son of a former vice president. [Hunter Biden] had nothing to offer except for access, and access to his father, who in turn could make a call. And that’s really what’s wrong with Washington right now. And that is why this story is so so troubling to many of us.”

Stewart decried the “sheer hypocrisy” of Joe Biden “spending decades beating up on the oil and gas industry, profiting by it for that four years when he’s not in public office, and then coming back in and trying to to hamstring and to kneecap our industry again.” -JTN

Watch:

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 15:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/uwavL0z Tyler Durden

The Other Reason The BOE Panicked: 26% Of All UK Mortgages Are Variable Rate And Set For Imminent Repricing

The Other Reason The BOE Panicked: 26% Of All UK Mortgages Are Variable Rate And Set For Imminent Repricing

Earlier today, we described the main reason why the BOE panicked – which, with billions in pensions set to suffer catastrophic losses absent an intervention, perhaps merited the latest central bank bailout. There is another reason why the central bank stepped in.

It’s not just the US where housing affordability is the worst in history: in a note from DB’s Jim Reid, the bank’s head of thematic strategist writes that the bank’s UK Homebuilding equity research team pushed out some fascinating insights into what the recent UK issues could do to housing affordability.

The note served for Reid’s latest Chart of the Day, and shows the ratio of UK mortgage payments to take home pay. The colored lines and numbers look at where this would go if you moved rates up in 50bp increments, relative to the last published version of this chart which used an average new mortgage rate of 1.9% in Q2.

For reference, Lloyds Bank were offering a 2yr fixed rate last night at 4.95%, assuming a 60-75% loan-to-value ratio, which goes up to 5.29% for 90-95% loan-to-value.

So at these levels, this would send affordability to worse levels than that seen during the GFC and within a couple of percentage points of the peak in the late 1980s/early 90s when the UK saw a savage house price crash. The report (available to pro subscribers ) also shows that in aggregate, we’re already around those levels for London.

Of course, not every mortgage needs to be refinanced today so these rates have time to change before most refinance. However, unlike the US where a 30-year fixed market dominates, the FCA suggested in August that 26% of the total outstanding UK mortgages  are variable rate and thus dependent on where the BoE’s bank rate is. It is currently 2.25% but markets are now pricing in a terminal rate above 6% which would be a huge shock if it got close to happening over the next 6-9 months as is priced in. 74% of mortgages are fixed (mostly between 1-2%), and half of these will need to be refinanced within the next 2 years, with half at a fixed rate beyond 2 years (but rarely beyond 5 years).

So 26% of mortgage payments are at risk of imminent increases, 37% at risk over the next two years if rates don’t rapidly fall, and 37% can ride out this storm for a few more years.

As Reid concludes, while much can change very quickly in politics and markets, if markets are correct, “the UK housing market is in for a huge amount of pain ahead,” unless the BOE were to somehow monetize all the upcoming debt issuance and sends rates back to zero.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 15:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/NkMosF5 Tyler Durden

8th EU Sanctions, Oil Price Cap Will “Make Kremlin Pay” For ‘Sham’ Referendums: Von Der Leyen

8th EU Sanctions, Oil Price Cap Will “Make Kremlin Pay” For ‘Sham’ Referendums: Von Der Leyen

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Wednesday touted that newly prepared EU sanctions will “make the Kremlin pay” for conducting its “sham” referendums in occupied Ukraine. Russian media the evening prior declared a sweep in favor of four regions joining the Russian Federation – including Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. President Putin is expected to announce their integration into Russia in a Friday speech.

“We do not accept the sham referenda and any kind of annexation in Ukraine, and we are determined to make the Kremlin pay for this further escalation,” von der Leyen told a scheduled press briefing in Brussels.

She announced a proposed eighth round of sanctions in a package that includes an expanded ban on Russian products and key technology, particularly out of Russia’s aviation, electronics, and chemical products sectors. The new package when implemented is “expected to deprive Moscow of an additional 7 billion euros ($6.7 billion) in revenues,” according to the EC chief’s announcement.

Sept.28 press briefing in Brussels on Ukraine conflict and Russia sanctions.

The new package also includes a range of targeted sanctions on Russian ministry and military officials, including officials responsible for organizing the Ukraine referendums. Additionally, EU nationals will be barred from having high-paying roles in Russian state-owned companies.

Perhaps more important, and controversial given the fresh sanctions would need unanimous approval by the EU’s 27 member states before implementation, is the oil price cap. Currently, partial prohibitions targeting Russian crude will kick in on December 5th. Though it doesn’t extend directly to shipping, a June sanctions package saw EU countries agree to block European companies from providing insurance and financial services for Russia’s seaborne oil.

In the Wednesday announcement, von der Leyen previewed, “We are laying the legal basis for this oil price cap.” This as Bloomberg is confirming this would include “a price cap for Russian oil sold to third countries.” But therein lies the biggest hurdle towards its passage as member states like Hungary have long warned that dramatic changes in its predictable energy supply levels received from Gazprom would put Hungary’s entire economy at risk.

As Bloomberg observed last week, when the price cap plan again came into central focus amid Putin’s ‘partial mobilization’ and escalation in Ukraine: “Representatives of national governments in Brussels will aim to reach a preliminary deal on the price cap ahead of an informal gathering of EU leaders in Prague on Oct. 6, the people said. But one of the biggest question marks will be Hungary, which has often played the spoiler when unanimous decisions are needed in the EU.”

In response to the European Commission’s eighth sanctions package rollout announcement, the Biden administration says it is prepared once again to partner in imposing “severe economic costs on Russia over its sham referendums,” according to the words of the Head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination Jim O’Brien.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 14:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/niYRScv Tyler Durden

Russ Roberts: Why Economists Suck at Explaining Life


Russ-Roberts-economics

Economist Russ Roberts is known for his extraordinary gift at finding creative ways of communicating the power of free market capitalism to the general public. 

He’s the host of the wildly successful podcast, EconTalk, which has been running weekly episodes since 2006. He’s the author of three novels and, along with filmmaker John Papola, he created the blockbuster Keynes vs. Hayek rap videos.  

More recently, his interest has turned to the fundamental inadequacy of his chosen discipline to comprehend what matters most to people. “I came to realize that economists…tend to focus on things that can be measured,” he tells Reason. “Dignity is hard to measure. A sense of self is hard to measure. Belonging is hard to measure. A feeling of transcendence is hard to measure. Mattering—that you are important, that people look to you. [These sorts of things are] about the life well-lived and they’re not about getting the most out of your money. They’re not about what the interest rates are next week. And economists truthfully have virtually nothing to say about these things.”

Robert’s new book is called Wild Problems and it deals with the decisions that define us: whether to marry, whether to have kids, what kind of work to pursue. He says these are the sorts of questions that can’t be figured out with economic modeling and cost-benefit analyses.

Reason talked with Roberts about how he makes sense of a world that is richer than ever in material resources and yet suffers increasing numbers of “deaths of despair.” We discuss his own life, from earning a Ph.D. in economics at the University of Chicago in the 1970s to becoming president of Shalem College in Israel to the central role that religion plays in his life.

Photo Credits: Russell Roberts, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Music Credits: “Little Eyes—Instrumental Version,” by Yehezkel Raz via Artlist.

Interview by Nick Gillespie. Edited by Regan Taylor and Adam Czarnecki.

The post Russ Roberts: Why Economists Suck at Explaining Life appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/1jqZvkd
via IFTTT

How Should Libertarians Think About Ron DeSantis?


rondesantis

No governor is more cheered and hated right now than Florida Republican Ron DeSantis, currently in the news for flying around 50 Venezuelan migrants to Martha’s Vineyard to own the libs. The 44-year-old Navy veteran and double-Ivy-Leaguer also headlined the third National Conservatism Conference, where he emphasized that the state should punish and reward businesses and individuals based on political positions.

Controversially, DeSantis has yanked longstanding tax breaks for Walt Disney Corporation after the company criticized his stance on gay rights, signed legislation that would limit social media platforms’ ability to moderate content and users (the law has been blocked by a federal court), banned mask mandates in public schools, and issued an executive order prohibiting businesses from requiring proof of vaccination from customers. He’s also pushed cities such as Gainesville to abandon zoning reform aimed at creating more diverse, multi-family housing.

If such top-down edicts seem at odds with traditional conservative support for local decision making and letting businesses act however they want, DeSantis has also gotten high marks for mostly keeping K-12 schools open during the pandemic and overseeing a boom in people moving to Florida to escape lockdowns elsewhere. When COVID death rates are adjusted for the age of residents, Florida’s rate (275 per 100,000) draws close to California’s (267 per 100,000), while both are below the national average (302 per 100,000).  He’s a strong supporter of gun rights and signed a $1.2 billion tax break package this spring, promising even more cuts if he gets reelected in November. Despite increased levels of spending each year of his governorship, the state is currently sitting on a $22 billion budget surplus.

So how should libertarians think about Ron DeSantis? Is he “a retaliatory culture warrior” and the leading indicator of an “authoritarian convergence” of the right and left? Or is he a successful large-state governor, the future of the Republican party, and, quite possibly, the next president of the United States? How should libertarians think about his mix of bullying and bravura that is turning the Sunshine State from a joke to one of the hottest destinations in the country?

I recently hosted a conversation about DeSantis and Florida with two recent blue-state refugees: Reason Senior Producer Zach Weissmueller, who pulled up stakes in California, and New York Post columnist Karol Markowicz, who hightailed it out of New York.

The post How Should Libertarians Think About Ron DeSantis? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/shNY2tn
via IFTTT

Ford Rolls Out Gas-Guzzlers To Fund Its Green Energy Ambitions


Two of Ford's new Super Duty pickups against a green backdrop.

This week, Ford Motor Co. unveiled its pickup truck product line for the 2023 model year. Among the options for the workhorse Super Duty series, the auto giant will offer multiple engine options, including a 6.8-liter gas engine, a 6.7-liter diesel engine, and a hulking 7.3-liter gas engine that automotive blog Jalopnik named “Godzilla.” Depending upon configuration, the truck can be over 6 feet tall and more than 22 feet long.

Given the company’s stated goals of reaching complete carbon neutrality and a shift to all-renewable energy by 2035, a beefed-up internal combustion engine would seem to directly contradict the mission statement. Ford has a different take: Gigantic gas-powered trucks are essential to the mission.

Ford’s trucks are part of its “F-series,” from the mainstream F-150s to the heavier-duty F-250s, F-350s, and above, used mostly as commercial vehicles. Anything above an F-150 is considered part of its “Super Duty” line.

To say that trucks are important to Ford’s bottom line is an understatement. As CEO Jim Farley told Yahoo Finance, “If the Super Duty was a separate company, it would have more revenue than some Fortune 500 companies.” The F-series alone generates almost $40 billion annually, nearly a third of the company’s global revenues.

As such, the continued success of the global truck brand is essential to the company’s future aspirations, including the $50 billion it pledged toward building out its production of electric vehicles (E.V.s). By 2026, it plans to be able to put out 2 million E.V.s per year, more than twice what Tesla sold in 2021.

Even still, it might seem backward to dedicate so much of one’s green energy goals to the continued success of gas-guzzling behemoths. But unfortunately, even the most worthwhile goals will involve some trade-offs.

For example, the European Union (E.U.) plans to become fully carbon neutral by 2050. It went so far as to ban the sale of all internal combustion engines by 2035. But this summer, facing devastating energy shortfalls in the near term, many European nations and the E.U. reversed course, pouring tens of billions into restarting coal-fired power plants and importing coal and natural gas to get through the winter.

Despite the dire situation, the United Nations (U.N.) Acting High Commissioner for Human Rights cautioned Europe to “consider the long-term consequences of locking in more fossil fuel infrastructure… There is no room for backtracking in the face of the ongoing climate crisis.”

Indeed, carbon emission reduction is fundamental to mitigating the effects of climate change. But the transition from a fossil fuel-intensive economy to one that more readily utilizes green technology cannot happen overnight. To progress toward the goal, private firms like Ford must stay in business, and utility providers must keep the lights on. Better they do that with fossil fuels than not at all.

Europe is committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, but it must also provide for its citizens’ needs today. Similarly, if your goal is to eventually live in a world where more than a quarter of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions do not come from the transportation sector, then it may require some awkward transitory periods of half-measures to get there.

The post Ford Rolls Out Gas-Guzzlers To Fund Its Green Energy Ambitions appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/mecXFSl
via IFTTT

The Big Short Squeeze Is Coming

The Big Short Squeeze Is Coming

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

The latest rate hike announcement by the Fed sent stocks tumbling to the year’s lows. While last week’s market action was brutal, the good news is the markets are set up for a rather significant short squeeze higher.

It is quite likely the Fed has already tightened more than the economy can withstand. However, given the lag time of policy changes to show up in the data, we won’t know for sure for several more months. However, with the Fed removing liquidity from the markets at a most aggressive pace, the risk of a policy mistake is higher than most appreciate. I added some annotations to a recent graphic from Chartr.

With the Fed now hiking rates, seemingly intent on doing so at every meeting in 2022, has the correction priced in the “bad news?”

The issue, of course, is that we never know where we are within the current cycle until it is often too late. An excellent example is 2008, as I discussed recently in “Recession Risk.”

The problem with making an assessment about the state of the economy today, based on current data points, is that these numbers are only ‘best guesses.’ Economic data is subject to substantive negative revisions as data gets collected and adjusted over the forthcoming 12- and 36-months.

Consider for a minute that in January 2008 Chairman Bernanke stated:

‘The Federal Reserve is not currently forecasting a recession.’

In hindsight, the NBER, in December 2008, dated the start of the official recession was December 2007.”

A Historical Analog

I am NOT a fan of market analogs because it is simplistic to “cherry-pick” starting and ending dates to get periods to align. However, I am going to do it anyway to illustrate a point. The chart below aligns the current market to that of 2008.

Notably, I am NOT suggesting we are about to enter a significant bear market.

I want to point out that in the first half of 2008, despite the collapse of Bear Stearns, the mainstream media did not foresee a recession or bear market coming. The mainstream advice was to “buy the dip” based on views that there was “no recession in sight” and that “subprime debt was contained.”

Unfortunately, there was a recession and a bear market, and there was NO containment of subprime mortgages.

However, even if a deeper bear market is coming, a “short squeeze” can allow investors to reduce the risk more gracefully.

Investor Sentiment Is So Bearish – It’s Bullish

Once again, investor sentiment has become so bearish that it’s bullish.

As we have often discussed, one of the investors’ most significant challenges is going “against” the prevailing market “herd bias.” However, historically speaking, contrarian investing often proves to provide an advantage. One of the most famous contrarian investors is Howard Marks, who once stated:

Resisting – and thereby achieving success as a contrarian – isn’t easy. Things combine to make it difficult; including natural herd tendencies and the pain imposed by being out of step, particularly when momentum invariably makes pro-cyclical actions look correct for a while.

Given the uncertain nature of the future, and thus the difficulty of being confident your position is the right one – especially as price moves against you – it’s challenging to be a lonely contrarian.”

Currently, everyone is once again bearish. CNBC is again streaming “Markets In Turmoil” banners, and individuals are running for cover. Our composite investor sentiment index is back to near “Financial Crisis” lows.

We agree investors should be more cautious in their portfolio allocations. However, such is a point where investors make the most mistakes. Emotions make them want to sell. However, from a contrarian view, such is the time you need to avoid that impulse.

While many investors have never witnessed a “bear market,” the current market volatility is not surprising. As we discussed previously, Hyman Minsky argued that financial markets have inherent instability. As we saw in 2020-2021, asymmetric risks rise in market speculation during an abnormally long bullish cycle. That speculation eventually results in market instability and collapse.

We can visualize these periods of “instability” by examining the daily price swings of the S&P 500 index. Note that long periods of “stability” with regularity lead to “instability.”

The markets could and possibly will fall further in the coming months as the Fed most likely makes a “policy mistake,” such doesn’t preclude a rather sharp “short squeeze” that investors can use to rebalance risks. Such is just part of the increased market volatility we will likely deal with for the rest of this year.

A Short Squeeze Setup

Currently, everybody is bearish. Not just in terms of “investor sentiment” but also in “positioning.” As shown, professional investors (as represented by the NAAIM index) are currently back to more bearish levels of exposure. Notably, when the level of exposure by professionals falls below 40, such typically denotes short-term market bottoms.

Another historically good indicator of extreme bearishness is the CBOE put-call ratio. Spikes in the put-call ratio historically note a surge in bearish positioning. Previous spikes in the put-call ratio have aligned with at least short-term market lows, if not bear market bottoms. The current surge in the bearish positioning suggests the markets could be setting a short-term low, particularly when a short squeeze occurs.

Lastly, the number of stocks with “bullish buy signals” is also plumbing extremely low levels. Like positioning and the put-call ratio, the bullish percent index suggests stocks have seen rather extreme liquidations. Such low levels of stocks on bullish buy signals remains a historically reliable contrarian buy signal.

As shown, when levels of negativity have reached or exceeded current levels, such has historically been associated with short- to intermediate-term market bottoms.

However, there are two critical points to note:

  1. During bull markets, negative sentiment was a clear buying opportunity for the ongoing bullish trend.

  2. During bear markets (2008), negative sentiment provided very small opportunities to reduce risk before further declines.

Such raises the question of what to do next, assuming a bear market is in full swing.

Navigating A Reflexive Rally

As Bob Farrell’s rule number-9 states:

When all the experts and forecasts agree – something else is going to happen.

As a contrarian investor, excesses get built when everyone is on the same side of the trade. 

Everyone is so bearish that the reflexive trade will be rapid when sentiment shifts.

There are plenty of reasons to be very concerned about the market over the next few months. We will use rallies to reduce equity exposure and hedge risks accordingly.

  1. Move slowly. There is no rush to make dramatic changes. Doing anything in a moment of “panic” tends to be the wrong thing.

  2. If you are overweight equities, DO NOT try and fully adjust your portfolio to your target allocation in one move. Again, after significant declines, individuals feel like they “must” do something. Think logically above where you want to be and use the rally to adjust to that level.

  3. Begin by selling laggards and losers. These positions were dragging on performance as the market rose, and they led on the way down.

  4. Add to sectors, or positions, that are performing with or outperforming the broader market if you need risk exposure.

  5. Move “stop-loss” levels up to recent lows for each position. Managing a portfolio without “stop-loss” levels is like driving with your eyes closed.

  6. Be prepared to sell into the rally and reduce overall portfolio risk. There are many positions you will sell at a loss simply because you overpaid for them to begin with. Selling at a loss DOES NOT make you a loser. It just means you made a mistake.

  7. If none of this makes sense to you, please consider hiring someone to manage your portfolio. It will be worth the additional expense over the long term.

Follow your process.

“short squeeze” is coming, but we aren’t out of the woods yet.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 14:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/WVrzsME Tyler Durden