Xi Reemerges In 1st Public Appearance After ‘Coup’ Rumors

Xi Reemerges In 1st Public Appearance After ‘Coup’ Rumors

So much for the “coup in China” and “Xi is missing” rumor mill of the past week, which at one point saw Chinese President Xi Jinping’s name trending high on Twitter

“Chinese President Xi Jinping visited an exhibition in Beijing on Tuesday, according to state television, in his first public appearance since returning to China from an official trip to Central Asia in mid-September – dispelling unverified rumours that he was under house arrest.”

He had arrived in Samarkand, Uzbekistan on September 15 – and attended the days-long Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit – where he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, among others.

Xi is “back”…image via state media screenshot

Importantly, it had been his first foreign trip in two years. Xi had not traveled outside of the country since before the Covid-19 pandemic began.

But upon returning the Beijing, he hadn’t been seen in the public eye since that mid-September trip, fueling speculation and rumors in the West and on social media. Some pundits floated the idea that he had been under “house arrest” amid political instability and a possible coup attempt.

According to a Tuesday Bloomberg description of the Chinese leader’s “re-emergence” in the public eye, which has effectively ended the bizarre rumors

Xi, wearing a mask, visited an exhibition in Beijing on Tuesday about China’s achievements over the past decade, state-run news outlet Xinhua reported. The Chinese leader was accompanied by the other six members of the Politburo Standing Committee, a sign of unity after rumors circulated on Twitter about a challenge to his power.

He’ll likely cinch his third five-year term as leader at the major Chinese Communist party’s (CCP) meeting on October 16. The CCP meeting comes only once every half-decade.

What had added to prior rumors was the fact that the 69-year old Xi recently undertook a purge of key senior security officials. This included arrests on corruption charges of the former police chiefs of Shanghai, Chongqing and Shanxi.

More importantly, former vice minister of public security Sun Lijun and former justice minister Fu Zhenghua were also sacked and faced severe charges.

Concerning Sun Lijun, state media made this shocking announcement a week ago: “Sun Lijun, former Chinese vice minister of public security, was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for taking more than 646 million yuan of bribes, manipulating the stock market, and illegally possessing firearms, according to the Intermediate People’s Court of Changchun in Northeast China’s Jilin Province on Friday.” The suspended death sentence means he’ll spend life in prison.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gYDfOx3 Tyler Durden

El-Erian: The Cost Of The Fed’s Challenged Credibility

El-Erian: The Cost Of The Fed’s Challenged Credibility

Authored by Mohamed El-Erian via Project Syndicate,

After previously eschewing interest-rate hikes, the US Federal Reserve has been tightening monetary policy at an unprecedented rate. But the current market turmoil and the central bank’s own revised projections show that a great deal of damage has already been done.

Financial markets’ reaction to the US Federal Reserve’s latest policy move was reminiscent more of developing countries than of the world’s most powerful economy. Given that the Fed is the world’s most systemically important central bank, this is more than just a curiosity. It has implications for America’s economic well-being – and that of the rest of the world.

On September 21, the Fed reinforced its two-month-old “HFL” approach of pushing interest rates higher, faster, and for a longer duration than previously anticipated. It implemented an unprecedented third successive 75-basis-point rate increase and sent a strong signal that hikes totaling another 125 basis points are on tap for the year’s last two policy meetings. It also signaled that the possibility of a “pivot” to lower rates is unlikely before 2023.

The Fed’s revision of its economic projections painted a darkening picture for the United States and most other economies. It is forecasting not only lower growth but also, and more surprisingly, higher inflation – something that it has done repeatedly in recent quarters.

The Fed’s latest moves are consistent with a central bank that is continuously scrambling to catch up with realities on the ground. It is the kind of thing that one typically finds in developing countries with weak institutions, not in the issuer of the world’s reserve currency and the custodian of the world’s most sophisticated financial markets – where many other countries and companies entrust their savings.

The comparison is even more troubling when one considers what the recent market turmoil implies.

For starters, markets see a central bank that, as hard as it tries, is still struggling to catch up with both market expectations and what is needed to contain cost-of-living pressures. Having been consistently pushed by markets to do more – and for good reason, given that core inflation is running at 6.3% and still rising – the Fed’s latest policy actions duly caused another sharp reduction in prices for both stocks and bonds.

Second, markets see a central bank that expects to cause more collateral damage as it tries to meet its inflation target. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said as much this month when he continued to distance himself from the possibility of a soft or “softish” landing, as he once put it. Powell has now repeatedly signaled more “pain” ahead, implying an uncomfortably high probability of recession. The market appears to agree with this outlook: the yield curve is inverted, with the yield on ten-year Treasury bonds having fallen to around 40 bps below that on two-year bonds.

Ominously, these market signals indicate that the US economy (and therefore the global economy) lacks both a monetary-policy anchor and a sufficiently credible central bank. As a result, the US needs more monetary-policy tightening than it would have if the Fed had reacted in a timely and credible fashion. That will indeed produce “pain,” in the form of foregone growth (actual and potential) and higher unemployment, which will hit the most vulnerable segments of society the hardest.

For the global economy, this will translate into even greater growth fragility at a time when Europe is heading into recession, China’s performance is increasingly lagging its economic potential, and little fires are burning across the developing world. Despite this increased fragility, many other central banks will have no choice but to follow the Fed in raising interest rates beyond what would have otherwise been needed, in order to avoid “importing” more damaging inflation and unsettling financial instability.

Now that the Fed finds itself in such an uncomfortable situation – one mostly of its own making – it may be inclined to eschew further rate hikes, particularly given the growing criticism that it is tipping the economy into recession, destroying wealth, and fueling instability. Yet such a course of action would risk repeating the monetary-policy mistake of the 1970s, saddling America and the world with an even longer period of stagflationary trends.

Instead, the Fed should be doing much more to contain the adverse spillovers of its policy mistake, including through innovative thinking about its monetary-policy framework and more proactive collaboration with other policymaking entities (domestic and abroad).

Sadly, it is too late to avoid all the detrimental economic and social consequences of the damage the Fed has caused to its own credibility. The central bank was notably late with its response to inflation. But it is not too late to contain the harm. Doing so is crucial.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/1i4ZIRP Tyler Durden

White House Says US Welcomes Russians Seeking Asylum

White House Says US Welcomes Russians Seeking Asylum

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Tuesday that the United States is ready to welcome Russians currently fleeing Putin’s “unpopular” war and can grant them asylum.

“We believe that regardless of their nationality, they may apply for asylum in the United States and have their claim educated on a case by case basis,” she said. This as there are continued reports of “total chaos” at some key border crossings leaving Russia, particularly at the Georgian border. 

Screenshot via CBS News

“In the four days since the announcement of Russia’s first mobilization since World War II, about 260,000 men of military age have left the country, independent media outlet Novaya Gazeta Europe reported Sunday, citing a Kremlin source,” writes The Moscow Times.

While Putin’s ‘partial mobilization’ order of last week impacts reservists with prior military experience, who will be sent to Ukraine (the defense ministry cited 300,000 reservists would be called up), there have been widespread reports of young Russian men receiving draft notices.

The Moscow Times continues of border traffic jams, “With tightened entry requirements for European Union countries bordering Russia, most of those leaving the country have been heading for the South Caucasus nations of Georgia and Armenia as well as Belarus, Turkey and Central Asian countries.”

Reports from the region late in the day Tuesday suggest lines of cars over 10 miles long at the Russia-Georgia border.

Some neighboring countries, most especially Baltic states, but also recently Finland, have moved to shutter their borders to all Russian visa holders as a measure to prevent an influx of Russian military age men departing the country.

Mongolia has also witnessed an uptick of border traffic. “The Russians are fleeing to Georgia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan and other countries because they don’t require visas,” reports NBC. “But getting to the border has been an ordeal for many.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 13:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/mgMTUk5 Tyler Durden

Yields Tumble After Stellar 7Y Auction

Yields Tumble After Stellar 7Y Auction

After a series of catastrophic coupon auctions, moments ago the US Treasury sold $32BN in 7 paper in what was one of the strongest sales in weeks. And all it took was a pivot by the Bank of England, one which most traders now expect will sooner or later come to the US.

Stopping at a high yield of 3.898%, the auction was the first one in weeks to stop through the When Issued 3.903% by 0.5bps; it was the 3rd consecutive stop through for the 7 Year tenor since a modest tail in June; the auction was also one giant step higher than the 3.130% yield on the August 7Y auction, and the highest yield since the GFC.

The bid to cover dipped modestly from last month’s 2.655 to 2.569, if just above the six-auction average of 2.547.

The internals were on the weaker side, with Indirects taking down 62.5%, down from 75.7% last mointh and below the 68.7% recent average. And with Directs taking down a solid 24.7% – one of the highest on record – Dealers were left holding 12.85% of the auction.

Overall, this was a very solid auction and understandably it has sent yields plunging both in the US – where the 10Y just dropped to a session low of 3.733% after rising above 4.00% just hours earlier…

… and globally, with 30Y gilts up (in price) a remarkable 25% today!

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 13:23

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2xfRJBF Tyler Durden

Peter Schiff: Jerome Powell Still Thinks He Can Pull Off The Impossible

Peter Schiff: Jerome Powell Still Thinks He Can Pull Off The Impossible

Via SchiffGold.com,

Last week the Fed raised interest rates another 75 basis points and continued to insist it was fully committed to doing whatever it takes to bring inflation back down to 2%. In his podcast, Peter argued that Powell still thinks he can pull off the impossible.

He can’t.

Most people expected a 75 basis point hike and that’s exactly what the Fed delivered. Peter said the Fed has gotten into the habit of giving the markets what they expect because he doesn’t want to upset them.

Even though Powell claims he doesn’t care about the markets, he absolutely does care. So, he only wants to raise by the amount that he thinks the markets are OK with.”

If the expectation is already priced in, you don’t risk much damage by meeting expectations. But Peter said the problem for the markets is that rates are going up.

It doesn’t even matter at this point. What matters more is that they’re not zero anymore, they’re going much higher, and you have a market that is priced basically for free money — for zero percent interest rates.”

Not to mention quantitative easing.

So, the markets have lost the two primary crutches that they were relying on for support. … Not only are those supports gone, but now we have the opposite. We have quantitative tightening, and we have money that’s getting a lot more expensive.”

During the post-meeting Q&A, Powell said he was committed to bringing about positive real interest rates. The projection is for nominal rates to be at 4.4% next year. That would mean another 125 basis points of tightening between now and the end of the year. Powell said he expected 4.6% to be the peak rate for the cycle and that would yield a positive real rate. But currently, CPI is running at 8.3%. That means even with the most recent hike, real rates remain deeply negative at -5%.

That raises a question.

If Powell is finally accepting the fact that to really push down inflation we need to have positive real interest rates, why not immediately move there right now? Why drag your feet? Why wait? In fact, why does the Fed even have to wait for a meeting to raise interest rates? If the Fed recognizes that interest rates are too low, why can’t it just raise them the moment it recognizes it?”

During the press conference, Powell said we need to act quickly to get inflation under control now because it will be even more painful later. He admitted that even now, this is going to cause some pain. But it will be worse later.

Yes! That’s true. So, where was Powell a few years ago when he said we were going to err on the side of allowing the inflation genie to get out of the bottle? If Powell knows how painful it is to deal with an inflation problem, why did he let it get out of control in the first place? Why didn’t he preemptively act when he had the opportunity?”

It’s pretty clear that back then, Powell was just delaying.

He didn’t care about the delay or how much more pain we’d ultimately have to endure. Because at that point, inflation wasn’t a big problem. The reason he wants to do something about it now is that the problem is so big, it can no longer be ignored.”

Even though Powell has conceded the inflation fight will cause some pain. He’s still holding out hope that the Fed can orchestrate a “soft landing.” Peter said, “That ship has sailed,” noting that the Atlanta Fed has now dropped the Q3 GDP projection to 0.3%.

And yet Powell called the economy “strong and robust.” That means the economy can withstand these rate hikes. The markets seem to believe this. But Peter said the markets are wrong twice.

They’re wrong about the economy and they’re wrong about the inflation. The economy is going to be much weaker than investors think. But at the same time, inflation is going to be much stronger than investors think.”

Meanwhile, these rate hikes are going to cause big problems for both state governments and the federal government as they try to finance their perpetual borrowing and spending. This will add trillions to the national debt.

This is a massive fiscal timebomb.”

The Federal Reserve kept rates at zero and ran QE in order to put off the pain. It has deliberately created inflation since 2008 to postpone the pain. The Fed didn’t want to allow a bad recession to get worse. It did it in ’08 and then doubled down with the COVID lockdowns.

The Fed wanted to prop up stock prices. The Fed wanted to prop up real estate prices. So, in order to do that, we created inflation. We put interest rates at zero. We did quantitative easing. Well, now we’ve got a huge inflation problem. And now the Fed has to fight a monster that it created. But the Fed can’t fight and create inflation at the same time. So, if the only reason the economy was propped up, the only reason the markets were propped up, was because of inflation, and now we’re going to remove the inflation prop, everything built on top of that foundation has to collapse. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing.”

So far, we’re seeing it in slow motion. But Peter said it won’t stay in slow motion for long.

The bottom line is the Fed can’t do what it claims it’s going to do. The Fed has kicked the inflation can down the road for 12 years. Now all of a sudden, it has found religion.

I don’t think Powell has found religion. I think when push comes to shove, he’s going to go back to the same old sin of inflation. … Powell still believes he can pull off the impossible. He still thinks we can bring inflation back down to 2%, where at most we have a bumpy landing, that unemployment tweaks up a bit and that we have a period of below-trend growth. … I think when Powell is really confronted with how ugly this is going to be, then we’re finally going to get that pivot. But this is a giant game of chicken, and I think Powell is going to keep up this pretense as long as he possibly can.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 13:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/XiQN0fY Tyler Durden

US Urges Increased Vigilance Of EU-Bound LNG Tankers After Nord Stream Sabotage

US Urges Increased Vigilance Of EU-Bound LNG Tankers After Nord Stream Sabotage

Due to large underwater “explosions” that damaged the Nord Stream pipeline system, European energy infrastructure faces increased security risks. 

US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm was quoted by Bloomberg as saying following the “apparent sabotage” of NS1 and NS2 pipelines, EU nations must increase security around energy assets, that includes LNG carriers en route to Europe. 

Granholm said European allies need to launch an “expedited investigation” into identifying the culprits behind the pipeline attacks. She added President Vladimir Putin’s recent move to weaponize natural gas highlights the urgency all EU members have to “evaluate the risks of relying on another entity for their energy.” 

The Baltic Sea region remains “tense” between Russia and NATO, Danish Defense Minister Morten Bodskov said. He expects Russian military forces in the Baltic region to continue their “saber-rattling.” 

Germany deployed warships to assist in the pipeline investigation, said the defense ministry, adding NS1 and NS2 leaks are an “alleged act of sabotage,” which emphasizes the vulnerability of critical energy infrastructure: 

“The circumstances of this disturbing event must now be quickly clarified and those responsible identified,” Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said.

“I have already exchanged views on this with my Danish counterpart,” she added. “We have agreed to share information and our navy will contribute its expertise to the investigation.”

Meanwhile, Norwegian energy giant Equinor raised the level of preparedness for all its energy-related assets, including supply locations, installations, helicopter bases, land facilities, and vessels, across Norway, local broadcaster NRK reported. 

Security risks around LNG carriers are something we outlined before the pipeline attacks — since EU states have had to source LNG via tankers due to dwindling Russian supplies via pipelines this summer, leaving many of these tankers sitting ducks in the open water. 

There are a lot of LNG vessels floating around Europe. 

And you never know what could be next… 

Did the CIA also warn Germany about future tanker attacks? 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 09/28/2022 – 12:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/dCFzqwt Tyler Durden

Ford Rolls Out Gas-Guzzlers To Fund Its Green Energy Ambitions


Two of Ford's new Super Duty pickups against a green backdrop.

This week, Ford Motor Co. unveiled its pickup truck product line for the 2023 model year. Among the options for the workhorse Super Duty series, the auto giant will offer multiple engine options, including a 6.8-liter gas engine, a 6.7-liter diesel engine, and a hulking 7.3-liter gas engine that automotive blog Jalopnik named “Godzilla.” Depending upon configuration, the truck can be over 6 feet tall and more than 22 feet long.

Given the company’s stated goals of reaching complete carbon neutrality and a shift to all-renewable energy by 2035, a beefed-up internal combustion engine would seem to directly contradict the mission statement. Ford has a different take: Gigantic gas-powered trucks are essential to the mission.

Ford’s trucks are part of its “F-series,” from the mainstream F-150s to the heavier-duty F-250s, F-350s, and above, used mostly as commercial vehicles. Anything above an F-150 is considered part of its “Super Duty” line.

To say that trucks are important to Ford’s bottom line is an understatement. As CEO Jim Farley told Yahoo Finance, “If the Super Duty was a separate company, it would have more revenue than some Fortune 500 companies.” The F-series alone generates almost $40 billion annually, nearly a third of the company’s global revenues.

As such, the continued success of the global truck brand is essential to the company’s future aspirations, including the $50 billion it pledged toward building out its production of electric vehicles (E.V.s). By 2026, it plans to be able to put out 2 million E.V.s per year, more than twice what Tesla sold in 2021.

Even still, it might seem backward to dedicate so much of one’s green energy goals to the continued success of gas-guzzling behemoths. But unfortunately, even the most worthwhile goals will involve some trade-offs.

For example, the European Union (E.U.) plans to become fully carbon neutral by 2050. It went so far as to ban the sale of all internal combustion engines by 2035. But this summer, facing devastating energy shortfalls in the near term, many European nations and the E.U. reversed course, pouring tens of billions into restarting coal-fired power plants and importing coal and natural gas to get through the winter.

Despite the dire situation, the United Nations (U.N.) Acting High Commissioner for Human Rights cautioned Europe to “consider the long-term consequences of locking in more fossil fuel infrastructure… There is no room for backtracking in the face of the ongoing climate crisis.”

Indeed, carbon emission reduction is fundamental to mitigating the effects of climate change. But the transition from a fossil fuel-intensive economy to one that more readily utilizes green technology cannot happen overnight. To progress toward the goal, private firms like Ford must stay in business, and utility providers must keep the lights on. Better they do that with fossil fuels than not at all.

Europe is committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, but it must also provide for its citizens’ needs today. Similarly, if your goal is to eventually live in a world where more than a quarter of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions do not come from the transportation sector, then it may require some awkward transitory periods of half-measures to get there.

The post Ford Rolls Out Gas-Guzzlers To Fund Its Green Energy Ambitions appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/mecXFSl
via IFTTT

IRS Sent $1.1 Billion in Child Welfare Payments to the Wrong People


Child Welfare subsidy Internal Revenue Service IRS Treasury pandemic COVID-19 child tax credit American Rescue Plan

In the first five months of sending expanded child welfare payments to American families, the IRS wasted only about $1.1 billion.

In other words, this might be the federal government’s most efficient pandemic spending effort—despite the huge amount of money sent to an estimated 1.5 million taxpayers who did not qualify for the payments.

An inspector general report for the Treasury Department released Tuesday details what the IRS got right (98 percent of payments were distributed correctly) and what it got wrong during the first five months of the expanded child welfare payments authorized by the American Rescue Plan, which cleared Congress in March 2021. The law increased the annual child tax credit paid to parents from $2,000 to $3,000 per child (and $3,600 for children under age 6) and made the tax credit fully refundable—meaning that parents could receive the benefits even if they paid no federal income taxes. Taxpayers with more than $75,000 in annual income or couples that earned more than $150,000 received smaller payments that phased out as income levels rose.

Effectively, it turned the child tax credit into a subsidy paid out by the IRS to parents in monthly installments. The boosted payments applied only during 2021, but the structural changes to how the child tax credit operates are permanent.

From July, when the law took effect, through November of last year, the IRS distributed more than $76 billion in child welfare payments. Of that total, about $1.1 billion was distributed to people who did not qualify for the payments, while another $3.7 billion should have been paid to about 4 million taxpayers who qualified, according to the report.

That means the IRS made about $200 million in fraudulent or wrong payments each month, which is simultaneously a staggering total and also a remarkably efficient result for a government spending program.

Compare that to other pandemic-era efforts that have been plagued by fraud. Earlier this month, federal prosecutors charged 47 people connected to a Minnesota nonprofit with allegedly stealing $250 million from a pandemic-era federal food program. That’s the largest scheme uncovered to date, but it’s only one data point in a constellation of wasteful and fraudulent pandemic-era spending.

An estimated 10 percent of the Paycheck Protection Program’s $820 billion was stolen by fraudsters, and taxpayers ended up paying roughly $4 for every $1 of wages and benefits to workers. Meanwhile, the federally boosted unemployment benefits were an even more costly mess, with as much as 20 percent being wasted, according to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. Maybe the most wasteful effort of all was the federal aid to state and local governments, with taxpayers dropping about $800,000 per job saved, according to a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.

The child welfare payments likely benefited from some structural arrangements that made the program less pervious to fraud. For one, the IRS already has piles of data about taxpayers and their dependents from years of filed tax returns. And rather than creating a new stimulus or welfare system out of whole cloth, the boosted child subsidies were merely piling more money and a different distribution system onto an existing tax credit. Eligibility for the boosted child subsidies was based on taxpayers’ 2019 and 2020 tax returns, which were already filed before the program was announced.

In short, if your goal is to defraud the federal government, it’s easier to do that with a fake company or a fake unemployment claim than with a fake child.

Still, the fact that this program resulted in more than $1 billion in wrongful payments in just five months despite all the structural advantages that it had over programs like the PPP says something too. Even when the federal government has all the tools it needs to effectively and correctly redistribute wealth, a large pile of money is going to be wasted in the effort.

By any reasonable standard, $1 billion in waste over just five months would be a failure. Grading on the government curve, however, makes this look almost like a success.

The post IRS Sent $1.1 Billion in Child Welfare Payments to the Wrong People appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/Y9FX2IS
via IFTTT

IRS Sent $1.1 Billion in Child Welfare Payments to the Wrong People


Child Welfare subsidy Internal Revenue Service IRS Treasury pandemic COVID-19 child tax credit American Rescue Plan

In the first five months of sending expanded child welfare payments to American families, the IRS wasted only about $1.1 billion.

In other words, this might be the federal government’s most efficient pandemic spending effort—despite the huge amount of money sent to an estimated 1.5 million taxpayers who did not qualify for the payments.

An inspector general report for the Treasury Department released Tuesday details what the IRS got right (98 percent of payments were distributed correctly) and what it got wrong during the first five months of the expanded child welfare payments authorized by the American Rescue Plan, which cleared Congress in March 2021. The law increased the annual child tax credit paid to parents from $2,000 to $3,000 per child (and $3,600 for children under age 6) and made the tax credit fully refundable—meaning that parents could receive the benefits even if they paid no federal income taxes. Taxpayers with more than $75,000 in annual income or couples that earned more than $150,000 received smaller payments that phased out as income levels rose.

Effectively, it turned the child tax credit into a subsidy paid out by the IRS to parents in monthly installments. The boosted payments applied only during 2021, but the structural changes to how the child tax credit operates are permanent.

From July, when the law took effect, through November of last year, the IRS distributed more than $76 billion in child welfare payments. Of that total, about $1.1 billion was distributed to people who did not qualify for the payments, while another $3.7 billion should have been paid to about 4 million taxpayers who qualified, according to the report.

That means the IRS made about $200 million in fraudulent or wrong payments each month, which is simultaneously a staggering total and also a remarkably efficient result for a government spending program.

Compare that to other pandemic-era efforts that have been plagued by fraud. Earlier this month, federal prosecutors charged 47 people connected to a Minnesota nonprofit with allegedly stealing $250 million from a pandemic-era federal food program. That’s the largest scheme uncovered to date, but it’s only one data point in a constellation of wasteful and fraudulent pandemic-era spending.

An estimated 10 percent of the Paycheck Protection Program’s $820 billion was stolen by fraudsters, and taxpayers ended up paying roughly $4 for every $1 of wages and benefits to workers. Meanwhile, the federally boosted unemployment benefits were an even more costly mess, with as much as 20 percent being wasted, according to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. Maybe the most wasteful effort of all was the federal aid to state and local governments, with taxpayers dropping about $800,000 per job saved, according to a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.

The child welfare payments likely benefited from some structural arrangements that made the program less pervious to fraud. For one, the IRS already has piles of data about taxpayers and their dependents from years of filed tax returns. And rather than creating a new stimulus or welfare system out of whole cloth, the boosted child subsidies were merely piling more money and a different distribution system onto an existing tax credit. Eligibility for the boosted child subsidies was based on taxpayers’ 2019 and 2020 tax returns, which were already filed before the program was announced.

In short, if your goal is to defraud the federal government, it’s easier to do that with a fake company or a fake unemployment claim than with a fake child.

Still, the fact that this program resulted in more than $1 billion in wrongful payments in just five months despite all the structural advantages that it had over programs like the PPP says something too. Even when the federal government has all the tools it needs to effectively and correctly redistribute wealth, a large pile of money is going to be wasted in the effort.

By any reasonable standard, $1 billion in waste over just five months would be a failure. Grading on the government curve, however, makes this look almost like a success.

The post IRS Sent $1.1 Billion in Child Welfare Payments to the Wrong People appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/Y9FX2IS
via IFTTT

When disaster came, I bet on Elon Musk over my local government

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Sovereign Man team member Joe Jarvis, who lives in Puerto Rico.]

Last week, Hurricane Fiona hit Puerto Rico, knocking out power to the entire island.

Over a week later, nearly 25% of the island is still without power, including dozens of local hospitals.

Puerto Rico’s power grid has been notoriously unreliable for years; in fact when Hurricane Maria blasted the island in 2017, the electrical grid was down for months.

This prompted the US federal government to shovel more than $30 billion in aid to Puerto Rico, which is a prodigious sum for an island of just 3 million people— it works out to be $10,000 for every man, woman, and child in Puerto Rico.

And out of that $30 billion, $12.8 billion was specifically set aside to fix the electrical infrastructure.

To put that figure in context, $12.8 billion should have been enough money to build new power plants, from scratch, that would have had enough capacity to power the entire island.

And yet, five years later, the electrical grid is even more unreliable and precarious thanks to endless government incompetence and widespread corruption.

To talk about incompetence and corruption in Puerto Rico is not hyperbole, or even remotely controversial. It’s common knowledge.

Just last month, for example, the previous governor of Puerto Rico was arrested and charged with bribery, along with a former FBI agent who helped facilitate the bribes. And the previous governor before that had to resign in disgrace after a series of major ethical scandals.

And with respect to the electrical grid, the president of the former state power company was arrested in 2019, along with a US federal government official, in connection with a $1.8 billion bribery scheme.

Everybody in Puerto Rico knows their government is rotten to the core.

Like our founder, I also live in Puerto Rico. Yes, there are problems. But there are also some really great things happening on the island. It’s a wonderful community. And the unparalleled tax incentives are incredible.

But at the same time I have no illusions that the Puerto Rican government is going to save me from a crisis.

When Hurricane Fiona came last week, I had my backup solar power ready to go, so that I could keep the essentials up and running.

I also used Elon Musk’s satellite Internet service, Starlink, to maintain communications. He seemed like a much safter bet than my local government.

Plus I have a propane grill, and enough food and water to survive for months if necessary.

(Extended living without electricity isn’t part of the plan, though, which is why I book a refundable flight out of town as an extra insurance policy whenever a hurricane pops up on the horizon.)

This is just an example of a larger point that governments do not solve crises. More often than not they engineer crises. But they rarely solve them. Puerto Rico is just a case study of a much larger trend.

Across the world we can see examples of abject government failure.

In the United States, the Federal Reserve completely failed to anticipate that their infinite money printing over the past decade (and especially in 2020) would spark inflation.

Then when inflation reared its ugly head in early 2021, they denied it. Then they rolled out the tiresome trope of inflation being “transitory”.

All along the way they kept insisting that they have everything under control and there’s nothing to worry about.

Today, however, their entire tone has changed. They’re engaging in extremely panicky monetary policy, desperately trying to raise rates as fast as they can and causing all sorts of havoc and destruction along the way.

They caused the inflation problem. They failed to fix it. And at the moment they’re making things worse by spreading fear and paranoia.

Social Security is another obvious example.

In its annual report each year, the Social Security Board of Trustees admits that the program is losing money and its financial reserves will “become fully depleted in 2034”.

In other words, the biggest retirement trust fund in the world, which helps pay benefits to tens of millions of people every month, is going to run out of money in 12 years.

These aren’t fringe economists spreading wild conspiracy theories or disinformation. These statements are published by the Board of Trustees for the Social Security program, which includes the Treasury Secretary of the United States, the Secretary of Labor, and more.

Once again, politicians caused the problem through endless fiscal mismanagement. They failed to do anything to fix it. And they’re making it worse every year.

Despite such utter incompetence, however, government still tends to view its citizens as helpless children.

Bureaucrats and politicians believe we are incapable of taking care of ourselves without their constant direction and meddling in our health, careers, finances, retirement, and even the education of our children.

This is a completely idiotic point of view. An institution with such a horrendous track record should have minimal influence and control over our lives. And we have all the tools we need to solve these problems.

We know, for example, that Social Security’s trust funds will run out of money in the early 2030s. After that, retirement benefits will either be drastically reduced, or may not even be there at all.

But (as we have discussed many times before) there are plenty of ways to solve this problem yourself— you can set aside a lot more money for retirement, invest in a wider range of asset classes, AND slash your taxes at the same time, using a Solo 401(k) structure.

I’m also not waiting for the Federal Reserve to ride to the rescue when it comes to inflation. We all have options protect wealth from inflation— even something as simple as “Series I” savings bonds which currently yield 9.62%.”

This is ultimately what a Plan B mentality is all about. You’re in charge of you. Not the government. And there are mountains of resources and solutions at our fingertips to solve the problems that they create.

Source

from Sovereign Research https://ift.tt/aVoF4w6
via IFTTT