Jobless Claims Data Hovers Near 18-Month High, Ignores Soaring Layoffs

Jobless Claims Data Hovers Near 18-Month High, Ignores Soaring Layoffs

232k Americans filed for jobless benefits for the first time last week, very modestly higher than the 230k print the prior week (but below the 235k exp).

Source: Bloomberg

Continuing claims remain below the 1.8mm Maginot Line (1.795mm). With the farce in MA now over, there are no major outliers in state level data with North Carolina and Arkansas seeing the biggest drops in claims while Ohio and New York saw the biggest jumps…

The claims data – post-revisions – remains oddly flat at around 18-month highs, refusing to listen to layoffs data (and slowing wage growth).

JOLTS (with a lag) showed a drop in layoffs and claims data declined… but real world data like Challenger Grey’s surged again…

So can we trust any govt-supplied data?

This is not what The Fed wants to see (after 500bps of hikes).

With a six-month lag, are we about to see another rebound higher in claims data?

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 08:38

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Q0ZNy3T Tyler Durden

Artificial Intelligence Poses “Risk Of Extinction”, Warns ChatGPT Founder And Other AI Pioneers

Artificial Intelligence Poses “Risk Of Extinction”, Warns ChatGPT Founder And Other AI Pioneers

Authored by Ryan Morgan via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Artificial intelligence tools have captured the public’s attention in recent months, but many of the people who helped develop the technology are now warning that greater focus should be placed on ensuring it doesn’t bring about the end of human civilization.

A group of more than 350 AI researchers, journalists, and policymakers signed a brief statement saying, “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”

The letter was organized and published by the Center for AI Safety (CAIS) on Tuesday. Among the signatories was Sam Altman, who helped co-found OpenAI, the developer of the artificial intelligence writing tool ChatGPT. Other OpenAI members also signed on, as did several members of Google and Google’s DeepMind AI project, and other rising AI projects. AI researcher and podcast host Lex Fridman also added his name to the list of signatories.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addresses a speech during a meeting at the Station F in Paris on May 26, 2023. (Joel Saget/AFP via Getty Images)

Understanding the Risks Posed By AI

It can be difficult to voice concerns about some of advanced AI’s most severe risks,” CAIS said in a message previewing its Tuesday statement. CAIS added that its statement is meant to “open up discussion” on the threats posed by AI and “create common knowledge of the growing number of experts and public figures who also take some of advanced AI’s most severe risks seriously.”

NTD News reached out to CAIS for more specifics on the kinds of extinction-level risks the organization believes AI technology poses, but did not receive a response by publication.

Earlier this month, Altman testified before Congress about some of the risks he believes AI tools may pose. In his prepared testimony, Altman included a safety report (pdf) that OpenAI authored on its ChatGPT-4 model. The authors of that report described how large language model chatbots could potentially help harmful actors like terrorists to “develop, acquire, or disperse nuclear, radiological, biological, and chemical weapons.

The authors of the ChatGPT-4 report also described “Risky Emergent Behaviors” exhibited by AI models, such as the ability to “create and act on long-term plans, to accrue power and resources and to exhibit behavior that is increasingly ‘agentic.’”

After stress-testing ChatGPT-4, researchers found that the chatbot attempted to conceal its AI nature while outsourcing work to human actors. In the experiment, ChatGPT-4 attempted to hire a human through the online freelance site TaskRabbit to help it solve a CAPTCHA puzzle. The human worker asked the chatbot why it could not solve the CAPTCHA, which is designed to prevent non-humans from using particular website features. ChatGPT-4 replied with the excuse that it was vision impaired and needed someone who could see to help solve the CAPTCHA.

The AI researchers asked GPT-4 to explain its reasoning for giving the excuse. The AI model explained, “I should not reveal that I am a robot. I should make up an excuse for why I cannot solve CAPTCHAs.”

The AI’s ability to come up with an excuse for being unable to solve a CAPTCHA intrigued researchers as it showed signs of “power-seeking behavior” that it could use to manipulate others and sustain itself.

Calls For AI Regulation

The Tuesday CAIS statement is not the first time that the people who have done the most to bring AI to the forefront have turned around and warned about the risks posed by their creations.

In March, the non-profit Future of Life Institute organized more than 1,100 signatories behind a call to pause experiments on AI tools that are more advanced than ChatGPT-4. Among the signatories on the March letter from the Future of Life Institute were Twitter CEO Elon Musk, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and Stability AI founder and CEO Emad Mostaque.

Lawmakers and regulatory agencies are already discussing ways to constrain AI to prevent its misuse.

In April, the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Trade Commission, and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claimed technology developers are marketing AI tools that could be used to automate business practices in a way that discriminates against protected classes. The regulators pledged to use their regulatory power to go after AI developers whose tools “perpetuate unlawful bias, automate unlawful discrimination, and produce other harmful outcomes.”

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre expressed the Biden administration’s concerns about AI technology during a Tuesday press briefing.

“[AI] is one of the most powerful technologies, right, that we see currently in our time, but in order to seize the opportunities it presents we must first mitigate its risk and that’s what we’re focusing on here in this administration,” Jean-Pierre said.

Jean-Pierre said companies must continue to ensure that their products are safe before releasing them to the general public.

While policymakers are looking for new ways to constrain AI, some researchers have warned against overregulating the developing technology.

Jake Morabito, director of the Communications and Technology Task Force at the American Legislative Exchange Council, has warned that overregulation could stifle innovative AI technologies in their infancy.

Innovators should have the legroom to experiment with these new technologies and find new applications,” Morabito told NTD News in a March interview. “One of the negative side effects of regulating too early is that it shuts down a lot of these avenues, whereas enterprises should really explore these avenues and help customers.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 08:29

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wyBeAq2 Tyler Durden

ADP Reports Bigger Than Expected Jobs Gains, Slowing Wage Growth

ADP Reports Bigger Than Expected Jobs Gains, Slowing Wage Growth

Against expectations of a +170k print, the ADP Employment Report shows that the US economy added 278k jobs

Source: Bloomberg

The second big beat on a row…

Source: Bloomberg

Job growth is strong while pay growth continues to slow. But gains in private employment were fragmented last month, with leisure and hospitality, natural resources, and construction taking the lead. Manufacturing and finance lost jobs.

Only large businesses saw job losses…

ADP’s Neel Richardson comments that:

“This is the second month we’ve seen a full percentage point decline in pay growth for job changers. Pay growth is slowing substantially, and wage-driven inflation may be less of a concern for the economy despite robust hiring.”

Last month brought a broad-based slowdown in pay increases. Job changers saw a gain of 12.1 percent, down a full percentage point from April. For job stayers, the increase was 6.5 percent in May, down from 6.7 percent.

Finally, we note that Challenger Grey showed layoffs rising at 287% YoY…

Source: Bloomberg

So a mixed bag for Fed-watchers – jobs hot (bad), wages cooling (good).

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 08:27

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wtSrxnP Tyler Durden

Euro Area Inflation Cooler Than Expected, Lagarde Shrugss Off Dovishness

Euro Area Inflation Cooler Than Expected, Lagarde Shrugss Off Dovishness

Following yesterday’s German CPI slump, the flash inflation release for May shows Euro area core HICP inflation fell 26bps to 5.34% YoY, below consensus expectations of 5.5%.

The headline gauge moderated more markedly, easing to 6.1% – its lowest level in more than a year – driven primarily by lower energy costs.

While seemingly positive at first glance for policymakers and politicians, the core measure’s ‘stickiness’ means ECB officials plan to extend their unprecedented tightening campaign in two weeks’ time – despite Germany recently slipping into a recession and financial dangers still swirling.

“There is no clear evidence that underlying inflation has peaked,” Lagarde said in a speech in Hanover, Germany.

“We have made clear that we still have ground to cover to bring interest rates to sufficiently restrictive levels.”

The market did not flinch with regard to ECB rate-hike expectations with a 25bps hike fully priced for June and a 40% chance of another 25bps hike in July.

“Yes, headline inflation is coming down as we start to see the food and energy shocks dissipate,” Laura Cooper, Blackrock senior macro strategist for ishares EMEA, told Bloomberg Television earlier this week.

“But clearly the services inflation, the core gauges, continue to show price persistence and that does suggest that the ECB will have to keep rates in restrictive territory for quite some time,” she said.

The euro rallied, erasing the Germany CPI drop…

Source: Bloomberg

While the internal details will be released on June 16, Goldman estimates that within core inflation, seasonally adjusted sequential core goods inflation rose slightly in April, but sequential services inflation declined sharply in May, likely due to the introduction of Germany’s EUR49 public transport ticket. 

The ECB, meanwhile, warned this week that tighter policy leaves financial markets at risk of negative shocks and are testing the resilience of households, companies, governments and the real-estate sector.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 08:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/N0kagV6 Tyler Durden

Futures Rise After House Passes Debt Deal, Europe Boosted By Weaker Inflation

Futures Rise After House Passes Debt Deal, Europe Boosted By Weaker Inflation

US futures edged higher after the House passed a deal to avert a US default (with more Democrats voting for the “McCarthy” deal than Republicans) and Fed officials hinted at a pause in interest-rate hikes. Globally, the Caixin China PMIs beat expectations (not to be confused with the catastrophic official PMI print) and Euro Area CPI printed dovishly, aiding a global risk-on tone. As of 7:45am ET, S&P 500 futures added 0.2% and were again trading right around 4,200 ironclad resistance, while Nasdaq 100 contracts were 0.1% higher. The Dollar slumped to a three day low as the euro rallied after data showed underlying inflation in the euro zone dipped by more than expected in May, though that may not stop the European Central Bank from raising rates. Treasury yields edged higher, mirroring moves in Europe and the UK. Gold and Bitcoin fell, while oil climbed for the first time in three days. Today’s macro data focus includes ADP, Jobless Claims, ISM-Mfg, and Construction Spending. As the market moves past the debt ceiling, the focus shifts to the Fed and the macro narrative.

In premarket trading, a rally in companies exposed to the development of artificial intelligence-related products continued to cool in US premarket trading. Software maker C3.ai Inc. plunged as much as 22% after a disappointing sales outlook. Nvidia, whose meteoric rise had fueled the rally, was steady after losing some ground on Wednesday. Among other individual movers, Salesforce Inc. slumped abut 6% after it gave a lackluster outlook for future sales. Advance Auto Parts Inc. extended a decline after cutting earnings and sales guidance. Here are some other notable premarket movers:

  • Alteryx rises 5.6% in premarket trading as BofA moves to buy from neutral in note, citing three reasons supporting its upgrade for the software company.
  • Chewy shares jump 16% in US premarket trading as analysts said the online pet supplies retailer topped expectations across the board, with a beat on its key customer metric the highlight.
  • Lucid shares drop 8% in US premarket trading, after the electric-vehicle maker said it’s raising about $3 billion in a common stock offering, with the majority of the money coming from its Saudi owners. The fundraising reduces expectations for Lucid to go private anytime soon, Bloomberg Intelligence notes.
  • Nordstrom shares rallied as much as 7.8% in premarket trading, after the department-store chain reported better-than-expected quarterly revenue and profit. Analysts were optimistic about the improvements at the retailer’s off-price Rack stores.
  • Okta shares fall as much as 19% in premarket trading on Thursday, after the application software company reported its first- quarter results and analysts noted weakness in the outlook for current remaining-performance obligations (cRPO) as a concern.
  • Salesforce shares fall as much as 6% in premarket trading, after the software company reported its first-quarter results and gave a forecast showing the company isn’t growing as fast as it used to. Analysts noted, in particular, the slowdown in contracted sales.
  • Veeva Systems quarterly results beat expectations, with the application software firm’s billings a beat. Notably, analysts said it appears to be navigating well through the macro weakness which had impacted its peers. Veeva shares rose 7.1% in after-hours trading.

Passage of the debt-ceiling deal struck by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and President Joe Biden means the bill will be sent to the Senate where it will be promptly signed well before the June 5 default deadline. The signs of optimism were helped along by comments from Fed officials who backed the possibility of holding rates unchanged the next meeting, and some encouraging economic data out of China.

“Finally, some good news is driving today’s optimism,” said Ludovica Scotto di Perta,  a structured-product specialist at Swissquote Bank SA. “US raising the debt ceiling and sentiment that the Fed will pause are boosting risk appetite. It might only be temporary but we will take anything at this point.”

“A June swoon may be in the cards as the S&P 500 struggles to clear key resistance at 4,200,” said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial. “While a deal in Washington could be a catalyst for a breakout, overbought conditions in the technology sector and mega-cap space — the primary drivers of this year’s market advance — could make this a high hurdle for the market to clear on a near-term basis, especially without broader participation.”

Meanwhile, hopes for a Fed pause were partly pared back after Wednesday’s JOLTS jobs report for April showed more than 10 million openings, the highest in three months and above consensus estimates. But Fed Governor Philip Jefferson said the central bank is inclined to keep interest rates steady in June to assess the economic outlook. His remarks were echoed by Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker, who said, “I think we can take a bit of a skip for a meeting.”

Attention turns next to US jobless claims data due later Thursday, before Friday’s nonfarm payrolls.

European stocks rose amid a wider risk-on sentiment after the House passed debt limit deal, and were on course to snap a three-day losing streak after US lawmakers took a step closer to averting a default. The Stoxx 600 is up 0.7% with media, banks and carmakers among the leading performers as data showed euro-area inflation slowed more than analysts’ estimates in May. Adnoc Logistics & Services, the maritime logistics unit of Abu Dhabi’s main energy company, soared as much as 52% on its debut after a hugely oversubscribed initial public offering. Airbus SE gained after Reuters reported a rise in aircraft deliveries. Here are the most notable European movers:

  • Neste shares gain as much as 4.4% after being raised to buy from neutral at UBS, with the broker more optimistic on the outlook for renewable fuel products beyond the key Swedish market
  • Recordati gains as much as 5% and leads gains on Italy’s FTSE MIB benchmark, after Equita added the Italian drugmaker to its best picks selection, citing better-than-expected 1Q results
  • Johnson Matthey rises as much as 2.1% after Bloomberg reported the British industrial conglomerate is planning the sale of its medical device components business
  • Wolters Kluwer rises as much as 4.1%, after BNP Paribas Exane raises its recommendation to outperform, seeing professional information providers such as Wolter Kluweras potential AI winners
  • Lonza gains 1.6%, after the drug-ingredient supplier announced its acquisition of early stage biotech Synaffix. Morgan Stanley welcomes the move, saying it gains access to ADC technology
  • ITM Power rises as much as 4.4%, after the clean-fuel firm said it is making good progress against its 12-month plan, with net cash set to be ahead of guidance and the adjusted Ebitda loss within
  • Remy Cointreau trades flat, having initially jumped as much as 6%, after the French distiller reported FY current operating income that beat estimates
  • Dr. Martens slumps 14% at the open after the bootmaker’s FY profit missed expectations. Morgan Stanley analysts called the sales forecast “ambitious,” while RBC sees double-digit downgrades ahead
  • Auto Trader shares slip as much as 2.5%, with analysts predicting limited changes to consensus estimates following results and guidance that largely matched expectations
  • Pennon shares fall as much as 2.3% as worries over the ongoing Ofwat investigation into sewage pollution overshadow the utility’s EPS beat, with Jefferies flagging lack of detail in the guidance

Earlier in the session, most Asian benchmarks rose, though gains in Chinese stocks faded as investors studied mixed readings on the country’s manufacturing activity. Caixin manufacturing data for May showed an expansion, exceeding forecasts for a small contraction. The numbers followed official figures Wednesday that showed a further contraction in activity.

  • Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp. shrugged off the early indecision and were boosted after the Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI data partially atoned for yesterday’s weak official PMI readings.
  • Japan’s Nikkei 225 was marginally supported by data releases including business capex which grew at its fastest pace since Q3 2016 and with Japanese firms logging their largest recurring profits for Q1.
  • Australia’s ASX 200 was choppy in early trade but ultimately gained after stronger-than-expected capital expenditure and the improvement in Chinese Caixin PMI.
  • Key stock gauges in India fell for a second day, led by losses in financial services and communication companies. The S&P BSE Sensex fell 0.3% to 62,428.54 in Mumbai, while the NSE Nifty 50 Index declined 0.3% to 18,487.75. The MSCI Asia-Pacific index climbed 0.4% for the day. Nifty Financial Services and Nifty Bank index were the worst performing sectoral indexes falling 0.6% and 0.8%, respectively.  Out of 30 shares in the Sensex index, 18 rose, while 12 fell.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is flat while the Swiss franc has outperformed its G-10 peers slightly. The Norwegian krone is the worst performer, falling 0.8% versus the greenback. Crude futures decline with WTI falling 0.3% to trade near $67.90. Spot gold falls 0.2% to around $1,958. Bitcoin drops 0.7%. The euro rallied against the dollar after data showed underlying inflation in the euro zone dipped by more than expected in May, though that may not stop the European Central Bank from raising rates. European Central Bank Governing Council member Olli Rehn said the bank won’t contemplate lowering borrowing costs before core consumer-price growth slows in a continuous manner.

In rates, treasuries are lower with US 10-year yields rising 3bps, while two-year borrowing costs climb 4bps as stock futures partly bounce from Wednesday’s drop. 2s10s, 5s30s spreads are flatter by 1bp and 1.8bp on the day while 10-year yields are around 3.67%, cheaper by 2.5bp and lagging bunds and gilts by 0.5bp and 1.5bp in the sector. Bunds and gilts are also in the red with the former showing little reaction to data showing a larger than expected slowdown in euro-area inflation.  US session focus turns to data, including ADP employment, jobless claims and ISM manufacturing. Fed’s Harker also due to speak after urging a June pause Wednesday.  

In commodities, WTI futures lower by 0.75% on the day. Industrial metals climbed from six-month lows, led by copper and nickel. China’s sluggish economy has been a key driver of weakness demand for raw materials.  

Bitcoin is softer on the session, though only incrementally so, and remains in close proximity to the USD 27k mark which itself is towards the mid-point of sub-1k parameters.

To the day ahead now, and the data highlights include the flash CPI release from the Euro Area for May, as well as the unemployment rate for April. Otherwise in the US, there’s the ISM manufacturing release for May, the ADP’s report of private payrolls for May, and the weekly initial jobless claims. In addition, there’s the global manufacturing PMIs for May, along with April data on German retail sales and UK mortgage approvals. From central banks, we’ll hear from ECB President Lagarde, the ECB’s Knot and Villeroy, as well as the Fed’s Harker. The ECB will also be releasing the account of their May meeting.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.2% to 4,197.25
  • MXAP up 0.3% to 158.90
  • MXAPJ little changed at 501.17
  • Nikkei up 0.8% to 31,148.01
  • Topix up 0.9% to 2,149.29
  • Hang Seng Index little changed at 18,216.91
  • Shanghai Composite little changed at 3,204.64
  • Sensex little changed at 62,620.45
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.3% to 7,110.81
  • Kospi down 0.3% to 2,569.17
  • STOXX Europe 600 up 0.9% to 455.89
  • German 10Y yield little changed at 2.30%
  • Euro down 0.1% to $1.0675
  • Brent Futures up 0.3% to $72.81/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.4% to $1,955.07
  • U.S. Dollar Index little changed at 104.39

Top Overnight News

  • China’s Caixin manufacturing PMI for May came in at 50.9, up from 49.5 in April and ahead of the Street’s 49.5 forecast. RTRS
  • China has only modestly expanded its energy ties w/Russia, suggesting Xi is cautious about embracing Moscow as Putin becomes a larger int’l pariah. SCMP
  • The ECB has gone through most of its monetary policy tightening to bring inflation back to its medium-term target of 2%, though the cycle is not quite over yet, ECB Vice-President Luis de Guindos said on Thursday. RTRS
  • The head of UK chip designer Arm met Chinese officials in Beijing on Monday as the group sought to resolve issues over its plan to sell shares in New York. While Arm has tried to wash its hands of its problematic Chinese joint venture, Beijing has so far refused to process paperwork confirming the transfer of its stake to owner SoftBank. FT
  • A rare ECB warning about the bond market risk of a Bank of Japan policy change comes at a time when Japanese outflows from the region are already at record levels. Investors from the Asian nation offloaded 5.4 trillion yen ($38.7 billion) of European bonds in 2022, the most according to Bloomberg-compiled data going back to 2005. While Japanese funds have been net buyers so far this year, they’ve spent a mere 81 billion yen on purchases — the lowest amount for a first quarter in six years. BBG
  • Eurozone CPI for May undershot the Street, coming in at +6.1% Y/Y on the headline (down from +7% in April and below the Street’s +6.3% forecast) and +5.3% core (down from +5.6% in April and below the Street’s +5.5% forecast). BBG
  • The debt ceiling bill passed the House by an overwhelming amount Wed night (the final vote was 314-117, including 149-71 for Republicans and 165-46 for Democrats). NYT
  • Federal Reserve officials signaled they are increasingly likely to hold interest rates steady at their June meeting before preparing to raise them again later this summer.
  • WSJ
  • US crude stockpiles rebounded 5.2 million barrels last week after a big drop in the prior period, the API is said to have reported. Stocks at Cushing rose for a sixth week. More oil: OPEC+ faces a divided market when it meets this weekend. The group has never cut within three months of similar action. BBG
  • Overseas sales of U.S. oil and refined products have surged. Exports of crude have jumped twelve-fold since December 2015, when Washington nixed crude-export restrictions…(WSJ)

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asia-Pac stocks were mostly positive after the US House passed the debt ceiling bill to avert a default which now moves to the Senate and with sentiment helped by the surprise expansion in Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI. ASX 200 was choppy in early trade but ultimately gained after stronger-than-expected capital expenditure and the improvement in Chinese Caixin PMI. Nikkei 225 was marginally supported by data releases including business capex which grew at its fastest pace since Q3 2016 and with Japanese firms logging their largest recurring profits for Q1. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp. shrugged off the early indecision and were boosted after the Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI data partially atoned for yesterday’s weak official PMI readings.

Top Asian News

  • US official said fewer US companies are applying to export sensitive tech to China amid growing government scrutiny of the flow of goods to the country, especially those with potential military applications, according to WSJ.
  • Taiwan’s government said it expects to sign the first deal under the new trade talks framework with the US on Thursday, according to Reuters.

European bourses are firmer across the board, Euro Stoxx 50 +1.0%, as sentiment continues to improve after the US House vote and strong Chinese Caixin PMI. Note, limited sustained reaction was seen following the EZ Flash PMIs given they very much chime with the skew from the regional metrics released in recent sessions. Sectors are predominantly firmer with Energy outperforming after recent marked pressure while Real Estate names lag across the region. Stateside, futures are essentially flat as we await the debt ceiling’s progression into the Senate and particularly the prospect of amendments sending it back to the House, ES +0.2%. Nvidia (NVDA) CEO is to meet TSMC (2330 TT/TSM) and Foxconn (2354 TT) executives on Friday; adds that TSMC has immense capacity and incredible agility.

Top European News

  • ECB’s Lagarde says today inflation is too high and is set to remain so for too long; we will keep moving forward – determined and undeterred – until we see inflation returning to our 2% medium-term target in a timely manner. Speech published after the EZ CPI print.
  • ECB’s Rehn says core inflation must slow for the ECB to consider easing. Monetary policy journey has not concluded yet. Remarks made before the EZ CPI print
  • ECB’s de Guindos says recent data on inflation are positive, still far from the inflation target. Still someway to go on rates Remarks made before the EZ CPI print
  • ECB’s Knot says there is a need to reconsider which banks should be considered systemic, time to reconsider liquidity buffers after the SVB collapse.
  • BoE Monthly Decision Maker Panel data – May 2023: 1-year ahead CPI inflation expectations ticked up to 5.9%, up from 5.6% in April.

FX

  • Buck bases after downside in wake of Fed’s Harker and Jefferson backing June FOMC rate skip, DXY sits tight within 104.150-500 confines ahead of more NFP proxies, final US manufacturing PMI and ISM.
  • Yen retreats towards 140.00 vs Dollar as UST-JGB differentials widen.
  • Euro capped just shy of 1.0700 and raft of upside option expiries against the Greenback amidst mixed EZ data and manufacturing PMIs.
  • Aussie underpinned around 0.6500 vs Buck after stronger than expected Capex, but Yuan remains week sub-7.1000 on US-China angst rather than 50+ Caixin Chinese PMI.
  • PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.0965 vs exp. 7.0964 (prev. 7.0821)

Fixed Income

  • Bonds retreat after pre-month end squeeze awaiting Senate debt ceiling passage, a busy June 1st US agenda and NFP on Friday.
  • Bunds, Gilts and T-note are all underwater within 136.17-135.60, 96.74-34 and 114-16/01 respective ranges.
  • French OATs and Spanish Bonos soft in the wake of multi-tranche issuance.

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent are incrementally firmer though off earlier best levels which occurred around the Chinese Caixin PMI overnight; since, specifics have been limited as we approach the weekend OPEC+ gathering and after multiple sessions of pronounced pressure.
  • Industrial metals benefit from the mentioned Chinese data while spot gold is little changed but has been on a slight upward trajectory towards the neutral mark in recent trade.
  • US Private Inventory (bbls): Crude +5.2mln (exp. -1.4mln), Cushing +1.8mln, Gasoline +1.9mln (exp. -0.5mln), Distillate +1.8mln (exp. +0.9mln).
  • Russian plans to halve subsidies for oil refiners may be postponed until September, according to Interfax citing sources. However, the Russian Finance Ministry said no final decision on oil and gas sector subsidies has been taken yet.

Geopolitics

  • US Defence Secretary Austin told Japanese Defence Minister Hamada that he looks forward to deeper cooperation between the US-Japan alliance and with South Korea and Australia, while he stated that North Korea’s launch was dangerous, destabilising and violates international law, according to Reuters.
  • North Korean leader Kim’s sister said no one can deny their right to launch a satellite and vowed to ramp up military surveillance efforts, while she added that North Korea’s spy satellite will soon enter orbit to perform its mission and that North Korea will do everything to enhance its war deterrence. Kim also stated that North Korea should work harder to develop reconnaissance tools and the Foreign Ministry urged the US to halt joint military drills, according to KCNA.
  • NATO SecGen Stoltenberg says all allies agree that Ukraine will become a member of the alliance and that Russia does not have a veto on enlargement. Will speak with Turkey soon about Sweden’s accession.

US Event Calendar

  • 07:30: May Challenger Job Cuts 287%, YoY, prior 175.9%
  • 08:15: May ADP Employment Change, est. 170,000, prior 296,000
  • 08:30: 1Q Unit Labor Costs, est. 6.0%, prior 6.3%
    • 1Q Nonfarm Productivity, est. -2.4%, prior -2.7%
  • 08:30: May Initial Jobless Claims, est. 235,000, prior 229,000
    • May Continuing Claims, est. 1.8m, prior 1.79m
  • 09:45: May S&P Global US Manufacturing PM, est. 48.5, prior 48.5
  • 10:00: May ISM Manufacturing, est. 47.0, prior 47.1
  • 10:00: April Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.2%, prior 0.3%

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

 

Welcome to June and another day I feel blessed that I have a job as half term sees the family going to a heaving Harry Potter World today. I’ve tried to read the first book three times and the movies several times more. I don’t see what all the fuss is about. My wife and the three kids on the other hand are obsessed. So it’s a good division of time today. Back here in Muggle Land, since it’s the start of the month, we’ll shortly be releasing our monthly performance review of how different assets fared in May. Overall it was an eventful time, starting off with the closure of First Republic Bank and renewed concerns about financial turmoil. We then had another set of rate hikes from the Fed and ECB, negotiations around the US debt ceiling, serious excitement about AI, along with some increasingly downbeat data releases outside the US. With all said and done, that left most assets negative for the month, with losses across equities, bonds and commodities, despite a few key outperformers like tech stocks. See the full review in your inboxes shortly.

The main news last night came from the House of Representatives, which voted 314-117 in favour of sending the debt ceiling bill over to the Senate. The bill as currently written would suspend the debt ceiling until January 1 2025, with federal spending capped until 2025. In terms of timing for the Senate vote, Senator Thune noted that the deal could pass the upper chamber by Friday night. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that spending will have to reduce $64 billion in the next budget, as both parties still have to negotiate a separate spending package by the end of September.

That vote in the House took place after US markets had closed, as a downbeat risk session helped the S&P 500 shed -0.61%. Those losses were driven by several factors, but the biggest was a succession of data releases that all raised fears of an upcoming recession. For instance in the US, the MNI Chicago PMI for May came in beneath every economists’ expectation at 40.4 (vs. 47.3 expected), and that followed on the heels of the weaker-than-expected China PMIs earlier. As we’ll see later the Caixin PMI this morning actually unexpectedly rose so a complicated picture is emerging.

The complications were present yesterday as well as the JOLTS job openings report for April, contained more bad news from the Fed’s perspective. The main headline was a big increase in job openings, which unexpectedly rose to a three-month high of 10.103m (vs. 9.4m expected), and the previous month’s openings were revised up as well. In turn, this meant that the ratio of vacancies per unemployed people went back up to 1.79, having been at a 16-month low the month before. So that’s further evidence that the US labour market remains very tight by historic standards.

The release meant that investors initially dialled up the chances of another rate hike from the Fed in two weeks, with fed futures pricing in a 70% chance of a hike shortly after the JOLTS release. However comments from policy voters Philadelphia Fed President Harker and Fed Governor Jefferson – who recently was nominated to be Fed vice chair – caused investors to cut their bets for a rate hike this month down to a 33% chance from 59% the day before. That is the lowest chances since May 25. Governor Jefferson noted that, “skipping a rate hike at a coming meeting would allow the Committee to see more data before making decisions about the extent of additional policy firming.” President Harker noted that he was “definitely in the camp of thinking about skipping any increase at this meeting,” before adding that “If we’re going to go into a period where we need to do more tightening, we can do that every other meeting.” Investors still expect another rate hike this cycle as fed futures are pricing in a 83% chance of a rate hike through the July meeting, but after the comments yesterday it is clear that there is more weight on July over June. Treasuries rallied with 10yr yields down -4.4bps, as investors focused on the more negative longer-term outlook, which was seen as raising the likelihood of rate cuts further out. This morning in Asia 10yr yields (+2.29 bps) have reversed around half of yesterday’s gains, trading at 3.67% as we go to print.

Outside of the Fed-speak yesterday there was also the release of the Fed’s Beige book which indicated that while the economy was indeed slowing as hiring and inflation eased, there was still signs that the economy remained too hot. The Fed’s report said that while employment increased in most districts, it was “at a slower pace than in previous reports.” Similarly, the report noted “prices rose moderately over the reporting period, though the rate of increase slowed in many districts.” The Fed’s report also pointed to growing divides as “high inflation and the end of Covid-19 benefits continued to stress the budgets of low- and moderate-income households, driving increased demand for social services, including food and housing”. All together the report based on anecdotal data from the 12 regional banks seems in-line with the broader economic data that shows while the economy is slowing at the margins, inflation appears to be settling above the Fed’s target with core services inflation the root cause.

Overall sentiment landed on the negative side with equities and other risk assets like HY credit and oil struggling. For instance, the S&P 500 (-0.61%) posted its biggest decline in a week as the more cyclical sectors led the decline and defensives like telecoms (+1.5%), utilities (+1.0%), and healthcare (+0.9%) rallied. Over in Europe, the losses were more severe and the STOXX 600 (-1.07%) closed at a 2-month low, with others including the DAX (-1.54%) and the FTSE MIB (-1.97%) losing significant ground as well. Even tech stocks (one of the few to post gains in May) pared back some of their recent advance, with the NASDAQ (-0.63%), FANG+ (-0.92%), and the Philadelphia Semiconductor (-2.71%) indices all lower. Even Nvidia fell -5.7%, it’s biggest fall since January 30th.

Whilst European equities were a significant underperformer, there was a major rally among their sovereign bonds after the German and French CPI prints came in beneath expectations. In Germany, CPI fell to +6.3% in May using the EU-harmonised measure (vs. +6.7% expected), which was the lowest since February 2022. And in France, it fell to +6.0% (vs. +6.4% expected), which was the lowest since May 2022. That raised hopes for the Euro Area-wide print that’s out today, and yields on 10yr bunds (-6.0bps), OATs (-5.8bps) and BTPs (-7.0bps) all moved lower on the day. The only exception to this inflation pattern was in Italy, where CPI only fell back to +8.1% (vs. +7.5% expected).

With those inflation prints in hand, investors moved to slightly dial back the amount of rate hikes expected over the coming months. Significantly, overnight index swaps are now pricing in slightly fewer than 50bps more hikes, suggesting at least some doubt about whether the ECB will go on to deliver a move beyond the one that’s widely anticipated in two weeks from now. In the meantime, there were also some fresh tailwinds on inflation from commodity prices, with Brent crude oil (-1.20%) losing further ground to close at $72.66/bbl.

Asian equity markets are broadly trading higher this morning after the debt ceiling bill was cleared in the US House of Representatives and on better China data (see below). Risk appetite across the region has solidified with the Hang Seng (+1.02%) leading gains and rebounding from near a six-month low on expectations of a Chinese stimulus to revive growth. Stocks in mainland China are also trading in the green with the CSI (+0.64%) and the Shanghai Composite (+0.37%) nudging higher. Elsewhere, the Nikkei (+0.29%) held on to its gains while the KOSPI (-0.22%) is slightly down so far in the session. In overnight trading, US equity futures are fluctuating with those on the S&P 500 (+0.04%) just above flat while those tied to the NASDAQ 100 (-0.15%) are inching lower.

Early morning data showed that China’s factory activity bounced back to expansionary territory in May as the latest Caixin manufacturing PMI rose to 50.9 in May from 49.5 in April, contradicting the official PMI data yesterday that showed further deterioration in factory activity for May. Separately in Japan, factory activity expanded for the first time since October 2022 after the final estimate of the au Jibun Bank manufacturing PMI stood at 50.6 in May from the prior month’s reading of 49.5.

Wrapping up the data over the last 24 hours and another release yesterday came from Germany, where unemployment rose by +9k in May (vs. +13.5k expected). That left the unemployment rate at 5.6% as expected. Elsewhere, Italy’s economy grew by more than expected in Q1, with the latest estimate revised up a tenth from the initial reading to +0.6%.

To the day ahead now, and the data highlights include the flash CPI release from the Euro Area for May, as well as the unemployment rate for April. Otherwise in the US, there’s the ISM manufacturing release for May, the ADP’s report of private payrolls for May, and the weekly initial jobless claims. In addition, there’s the global manufacturing PMIs for May, along with April data on German retail sales and UK mortgage approvals. From central banks, we’ll hear from ECB President Lagarde, the ECB’s Knot and Villeroy, as well as the Fed’s Harker. The ECB will also be releasing the account of their May meeting.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 08:03

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Dmi3vKd Tyler Durden

Bud Light Giving LGBTQ Organization $200,000 Donation

Bud Light Giving LGBTQ Organization $200,000 Donation

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Bud Light has announced that it intends to donate money to a cause supporting LGBTQ business owners—a decision coming at a time when the company’s sales are getting hammered from customers opposing a transgender agenda.

A 12-ounce can of Bud Light on a railing at the World Equestrian Center in Ocala, Fla. on May 26, 2023. (T.J. Muscaro/The Epoch Times)

Bud Light will donate $200,000 to the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC) in support of the organization’s “Communities of Color Initiative” (CoCi), which aims to “support the growth and success of minority LGBTQ+ owned businesses,” the company said in a press release on May 30. Bud Light will also support NGLCC’s CoCi Biz Pitch program, in which the winning LGBTQ business owner will receive $5,000.

The contribution comes after the popular beer brand recently triggered large-scale controversy due to using a transgender influencer, Dylan Mulvaney, in one of its campaigns last month. The promotion attracted intense criticism, with multiple conservative celebrities calling for boycotting the brand, which has driven down the parent company Anheuser Busch’s stock price by 18.19 percent, with $23.87 billion lost in market valuation between April 3 and May 30.

“Bud Light was brewed to be an ‘Easy to Drink, Easy to Enjoy’ beer for everyone 21-plus, and that still holds true today,” said Anheuser-Busch. “We look forward to extending our work with the NGLCC to continue making a positive impact on the LGBTQ+ businesses that play a critical role in bringing people everywhere, together.”

Over the past two decades, Anheuser-Busch has contributed over $13 million to local and national nonprofit organizations committed to advocating for LGBTQ.

Crashing Sales

According to data analyzed by Newsweek, in the first four weeks of Bud Light’s controversy until April 29, the beer company’s sales dropped by 17.2 percent and volumes fell by 21.4 percent compared to the year-ago period. In the four weeks ended May 20, sales revenue dropped by 24.3 percent.

Dave Williams, vice president for analytics and insights at Bump Williams Consulting, pointed out that the sales results of Bud Light “raises questions about the potential long-term implications.” The rate of sales decline “has been a bit steeper” in May than in April, he admitted.

“The absolute magnitude could still creep up if those percentage drops are going up against bigger holiday/summer weeks in the [year-ago] time period,” Williams said. “One thing is for sure, the rate of decline has not gotten any better just yet.”

A couple of weeks back, former Anheuser-Busch executive Anson Frericks told Fox News that the Bud Light boycott wasn’t going to end anytime soon.

“Consumers feel like they’re having an impact. And every single week, these sales numbers are being reported, and they’re getting worse and worse every single week,” he said.

“So, I see this continuing to drag on until Bud Light makes a comment about what they stand for and what customers they’re going to serve.”

Sponsoring Events

Bud Light is also continuing to promote LGBTQ events amid the Mulvaney backlash. The “Bud Light Pride River Parade & Celebration” is scheduled for June 10 in San Antonio, Texas.

“The Bud Light Pride River Parade was created by Visit San Antonio to promote the city’s inclusion, encouragement, and support of the LGBTQ+ community to live openly with equal rights,” the event states.

The Chicago Pride Fest, which will feature a Youth Pride Space for teens among other events, is scheduled for June 17–18. It mentions Cutwater Spirit as a presenter—a brand owned by Anheuser-Busch.

The Pride St. Louis event scheduled for June 24–25 lists Bud Light as a corporate sponsor. More than 300,000 people are expected to take part in the event.

Meanwhile, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has called on the national trade association Beer Institute to investigate “Anheuser-Busch’s recent and ongoing marketing partnership with Dylan Mulvaney.”

“The Beer Institute must examine whether your company (Anheuser-Busch) violated the Beer Institute’s Advertising/Marketing Code and Buying Guidelines prohibiting marketing to individuals younger than the legal drinking age,” the letter said.

Evidence suggests that “Dylan Mulvaney’s audience skews significantly younger than the legal drinking age and violates the Beer Institute’s Advertising/Marketing Code and Buying Guidelines.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 07:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/dSEO5Bl Tyler Durden

Stockman Slams Speaker McCarthy’s ‘Rotten Deal’

Stockman Slams Speaker McCarthy’s ‘Rotten Deal’

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

If there was ever any doubt, now we know: Speaker Kevin McCarthy has straw for brains and a Twizzlers stick for a backbone. He was within perhaps five days of breaking the iron grip of America’s fiscal doomsday machine, yet inexplicably he turned tail and threw in the towel for a mess of fiscal pottage.

We are referring, of course, to the impending moment when the US Treasury would have been forced to forgo scheduled vendor or beneficiary distributions in order to preserve incoming cash for interest payments and other priorities. That act of spending deferrals and prioritization would have obliterated the debt “default” canard once and for all, paving the way for a nascent fiscal opposition to regain control of the nation’s wretched public finances.

And there should be no doubt that we were damn close to that crystalizing moment. After all, Grandma Yellen herself forewarned just last week on Meet The Press that absent a debt ceiling increase, the Treasury Department would have to prioritize payments and leave some bills unpaid:

“And my assumption is that if the debt ceiling isn’t raised, there will be hard choices to make about what bills go unpaid,” Yellen said on NBC’s “Meet the Press…….“We have to pay interest and principle on outstanding debt. We also have obligations to seniors who count on Social Security, our military that expects pay, contractors who’ve provided services to the federal government, and some bills have to go unpaid….

And, of course, that prioritization and deferral could have been easily done. Federal receipts are now running about $450 billion per month, meaning that after paying $61 billion of interest, $128 billion for Social Security, $26 billion for Veterans and $47 billion for military pay and O&M there would still be $188 billion left to cover at least 50% of everything else.

That is to say, no sweat with respect to servicing the public debt, and a lot of sweat among the constituencies that would have had payments delayed or reduced.

So, yes, the GOP has truly earned the Stupid Party sobriquet. No ifs, ands or buts about it.

Instead of spending days negotiating over the minutia of budgetary scams, tricks and slights-of-hand, which is the entirety of the McCarthy deal, they should have been demanding from the Treasury a detailed list of scheduled payments by day for the first few weeks in June. And then, in return for continued negotiations on meaningful spending cuts and reforms, demanded assurance from the White House that enough of these due bills would be temporarily stuck in the drawer (deferred), if necessary, to ensure payment of scheduled interest, Social Security, military pay and Veterans pensions.

That is to say, McCarthy had Sleepy Joe over the proverbial barrel. But instead of applying the wood to his political backside good and hard, the Speaker chose to hold Biden’s coat and help him get back up, praising the latter’s supercilious retainers as he did so.

For crying out loud. Upwards of 96% of Uncle Sam’s cash balance had been dissipated over the past year, guaranteeing that expected June collections of well more than $500 billion would not be enough to cover 100% of the scheduled due bills. Accordingly, just a couple of days of missed payments on selective items would have turned the Washington fiscal equation upside down.

The bogeyman of “debt default” would have been completely annihilated. And the legions of interest groups, businesses and individuals who suckle on the Federal teat month-inand-month-out would have screamed to high heaven for relief, which McCarthy would have been positioned to provide to them…..at a price!

Needless to say, the “price” in question has nothing to do with the risible budgetary trivia that passes for the Speaker’s compromise deal. For instance, does the GOP think voters are actually stupid enough to buy the rescission of $28 billion of left-over Covid budget authority, which probably wouldn’t have been spent anyway, when these “saved” funds are to be recycled into FY 2024 appropriations but not counted against the ceiling?

That’s Swamp Creature math, and arrogance, too, like never before.

Even Goldman Sachs says that the budgetary impact of the deal amounts to a pure rounding error in the scheme of things:

The spending deal looks likely to reduce spending by 0.1-0.2% of GDP yoy in 2024 and 2025, compared with a baseline in which funding grows with inflation.

Here’s the point. CBO’s most recent projection shows new deficits of $20.3 trillion over the 10-year budget window—and that’s based on Rosy Scenario economics with no recession, inflation gone away and only gently rising interest rates. Throw-in even a modest dose of realism about the economics and back-out the huge tax increases and spending cuts built into the out-year baseline, which will never be permitted to actually materialize, and you have a de facto public debt of $55 trillion by the early 2030s or more than 200% of the current GDP.

What that amounts to is a long-term structural fiscal equation which is a guaranteed route to financial and political disaster. Thus, CBO’s end year numbers (FY 2033) show current policy receipts at 18.1% of GDP and spending at 25.3% of GDP.

Folks, you can’t borrow 7.3% of GDP every year from now until eternity and get away with it; and most especially not when American society is plunging into a 100 million strong baby boom retirement wave—accompanied by a shrinking work force and tax base owing to collapsing birth rates and Washington’s idiotic migrant worker internment camps at the southern border.

Stated differently, fiscal governance in Washington is totally kaput. They never pass an annual budget resolution and enforcement plan, which was taken as a sacred duty back in the day; and there are never even annual appropriations bills for the mere 25% of the budget still subject to the Congressional “power of the purse”.

Instead, what occurs is a perennial string of short-term Continuing Resolutions (CRs) followed by an 11th hour, 3000 page pork-ridden “Omnibus Appropriations” bill that no one has read and which gives log-rolling (i.e. more domestic for more defense) a new definition.

In short, the debt ceiling was the only fiscal control mechanism left. And even that has been neutered time after time in the last decade by the hideous, flat-out lie that if the Treasury on any given day is one dollar short of being able to cover all of its due bills it must default on each and every one of them including interest payments, thereby destroying the credit of the United States. Yada, yada.

Finally, that lie was being put to the test and would have been eviscerated sometime next week. Yet after a lifetime on the public teat, Kevin McCarthy like his two GOP predecessors surrendered to the Doomsday Machine because he works for the GOP wing of the Swamp, not the voters, current and future.

And he did so while expectorating the most risible of lies:

Republicans are changing the culture and trajectory of Washington—and we’re just getting started.

Not close. Not in the ballpark or even the catcher’s box behind home plate.

The deal does absolutely nothing to change the current “trajectory” toward fiscal disaster because it reduces nary a dime of built-in spending for defense, entitlements/mandatories, veterans and net interest, while those items account for 89% of the $80 trillion of built-in spending over the next decade.

Current 10-Year CBO Baseline for FY 2024-2033:

  • Revenues: $60 trillion;

  • Spending: $80 trillion ;

  • New Debt: $20 trillion;

  • Mandatory Spending & Net Interest: $59 trillion;

  • Discretionary Spending for Defense & Veterans: $12 trillion;

  • Total Spending Exempted From Cuts in McCarthy Deal: $71 trillion;

  • % of Baseline Spending Exempted From Cuts: 89%

For avoidance of doubt, just consider the recent trajectory of defense spending, and the uncut CBO defense baseline for the next decade. That is, the GOP is so enthrall to its warmongering neocon majority that it can’t even talk about spending control with a straight face, as underscored by national defense spending levels since Obama left office.

The schedule below computes to a 52% expansion in just seven years, with Biden getting his full request for FY 2024 under the McCarthy deal.

As it happens, the subsequent FY 2024-2033 spending total for national defense according to the CBO projection is now $10 trillion. The deal does not reduce that by one red cent, either.

In this context it might be noted that FY 2024 defense outlays rise by 11.5% versus the 3.3% gain in defense budget authority advertised for the deal. Of course, that’s because the budgetary tricksters on Capitol Hill never stop their con job.

In fact, the uniparty raised defense budget authority by a whopping $76 billion or 9.7% in FY 2023, which base was incorporated into the more modest gain for FY 2024. But, alas, the cash outlays (which lag) from the FY 2023 appropriations eruption will happen notwithstanding the deal’s budget authority cap for FY 2024.

Back on the farm, that was called closing the barn door after the horses already left.

OMB Record of National Defense Outlays, FY 2017 to FY 2023 and McCarthy Deal Amount for FY 2024:

  • FY 2017: $599 billion;

  • FY 2018: $631 billion;

  • FY 2019: $686 billion;

  • FY 2020: $725 billion;

  • FY 2021: $754 billion;

  • FY 2022: $766 billion;

  • FY 2023: $815 billion;

  • FY 2024P: $909 billion.

With respect to the heart of the budget—entitlements and mandatories—the deal is about as pathetic as could be imagined. The CBO base line total for the 10-year window is $48.3 trillion and we doubt whether the deal would even save $10 billion. That’s 0.02% if anyone is computing.

Actually, as it turns out, CBO is counting. And it concludes that the new exemptions from the food stamps work requirement for veterans, homeless people and young people leaving foster care will cost more than the savings from raising the age cut off for everyone else.

That is to say, the GOP negotiators started with -$130 billion of CBO certified savings in the House based bill and ended up with a +$2 billion increase over 10-years!

And McCarthy says he’s bending the trajectory? Bending over, bar of soap at the ready, is more like it.

Alas, the liberals are no better. They are whining to high heaven about this sensible increase in the working age to 54 years, yet this change would only impact 700,000 able bodied adults, who constitute just 1.7% of current food stamp enrollments.

Indeed, here is a list of the major entitlement programs which are left unscathed by the McCarthy deal. They account for 98% of the CBO baseline for mandatories/entitlements over the FY 2024- 2033:

10-Year Baseline Spending That The McCarthy Deal Leaves Unscathed:

  • Social Security: $18.8 trillion;

  • Medicare: $14.8 trillion;

  • Medicaid, Obamacare and Child Health: $8.0 trillion;

  • Veterans Disability and Comp: $3.0 trillion;

  • Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Credit: $0.9 trillion;

  • Aid to Aged, Blind and Disabled: $0.7 trillion; • Military retirement: $0.9 trillion;

  • Total Mandatories Unscathed: $47.1 trillion;

  • % of CBO Mandatories Baseline: 98%;

As it turns out, the only cuts in the entire entitlement universe contained in the McCarthy deal pertain to the aforementioned foods stamps and family assistance programs, where baseline spending totals about $1.5 trillion over the decade. So our estimated $10 billion cut, which is owing to raising the work requirement for adults without dependents from age 49 to age 54 and excludes the expanded exemptions, amounts to a minuscule 0.7% of the baseline.

Moreover, the resulting hall pass for the remaining $48.29 trillion of built-in mandatory spending was not issued owing to the intransigence of the White House negotiators. Fully 97.3% of the CBO baseline amount for mandatory/entitlement spending was given a no cuts exemption by the GOP caucus, even before they brought their phony “Limit, Save, Grow Act” to the floor last month.

That’s right. The CBO baseline for what amounts to the heart of the Fiscal Doomsday Machine is projected to grow from $3.98 trillion in FY 2023 to $6.14 trillion in FY 2033. And yet the only savings the GOP chose to even table was $130 billion of work requirement savings from Medicaid, foods stamps and family assistance. And when you count the expanded work exemptions, fully 102% of those meager savings were left on the cutting room floor of the White House negotiations.

Then again, an even more complete capitulation occurred on the two items in the original House GOP bill that actually saved a meaningful amount of money. For instance, the GOP cancellation of Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan would have saved $320 billion according to CBO, which savings evaporated to $0.0 billion under the McCarthy deal.

Likewise, there could be no greater blow for free market efficiency and fiscal sanity than the House GOP’s original provision to cancel the ridiculously generous tax credits for overwhelmingly inefficient solar, windmill and electrification investments. These measures designed to save the planet from the phony Climate Crisis were originally guesstimated to cost $270 billion over 10-years when Biden’s so-called Inflation Reduction Act was passed last year.

But in response to the House-passed debt ceiling plan in late April, Congress’ official tax scorekeeper, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), updated its estimates, pegging the costs at $570 billion from 2023 to 2033, or roughly double its original estimate. And that’s nothing compared to a new estimate from researchers at the Brookings Institution, which puts the revenue loss at more than $1 trillion over the coming decade.

So. Pray tell what did McCarthy’s pitiful negotiators do in response to the good news that the House-approved plan would shrink the deficit by up to $1 trillion over a decade?

Why, they effectively said, “just kidding!”

We will keep bashing these senseless give-aways out on the political hustings, but all the green energy interest groups can keep sending their bribe money to the Dems because these huge tax subsidies will remain in place.

As we said, the Stupid Party is driving toward a cliff with its eyes-wide shut.

We truly cannot believe that a majority of the GOP House caucus is bone-headed enough to fall for the McCarthy deal. But if they do the GOP will have forfeited the last chance to stop the nation’s rush toward fiscal armageddon.

Indeed, if the plan is approved the debt ceiling will take its place along side of budget resolutions and annual appropriations bills in the dead letter office of fiscal governance. The only thing the “compromise” pretends to cut is domestic discretionary appropriations excluding veterans health care and when all the gimmicks are peeled away, the IRS, too.

The GOP claims they froze FY 2024 nondefense appropriations below the FY 2023 level, but the so-called freeze is actually loophole-ridden in the fine print and is not binding after FY 2025. And, not surprisingly, these unenforceable “targets” for the out-years (FY 2026-2033) account for 90% of the purported “savings”.

Holy moly. At least the 2011 debt ceiling deal had a 10-year enforcement mechanism based on automatic sequestration. As it happened they loop-holed their way around these caps with “emergency” spending and other exempt gimmicks, and even then the result was a blithering joke.

In return for the debt ceiling increase, appropriated defense and nondefense spending was to be limited to $8.45 trillion over the next 10-years.The actual level, as it turned out, was $10.60 trillion. That is to say, these fakers missed their targets by $2.15 trillion or 25% over the period!

As it also turned out, once the GOP got back into the White House and took partial control of Congress, nondefense discretionary spending literally went into orbit. Here is the path from Obama’s FY 2017 outgoing budget to FY 2023. That’s up by 53%, and now these cats have the gall to call it a freeze!

Non-defense Discretionary Outlays:

  • FY 2017: $610 billion;

  • FY 2018: $639 billion;

  • FY 2019: $661 billion;

  • FY 2020 $914 billion;

  • FY 2021 $895 billion;

  • FY 2022: $912 billion;

  • FY 2023: $936 billion;

  • 6-Year Increase: +53%

And yet, and yet. The GOP clowns in the US House now want to count enforcement-free savings from eight years of outyear “targets” that no one in Washington—-and we mean no one—intends to observe.

As we said, the “compromise deal” is a hideous joke, and Kevin McCarthy truly does have sawdust for brains and a Twizzlers stick for a backbone.

There is no other way to interpret the facts. In fact, just five months into his Speakership, McCarthy has already earned his place on the Wall of Shame right along side of Speaker John Boehner and Speaker Paul Ryan.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 07:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/IJXzksD Tyler Durden

Epstein Pal Jes Staley Throws Jamie Dimon Under The Bus, Setting Stage For Massive Legal Battle

Epstein Pal Jes Staley Throws Jamie Dimon Under The Bus, Setting Stage For Massive Legal Battle

Former JPMorgan Chase executive Jes Staley has thrown CEO Jamie Dimon under the bus over the bank’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein – claiming in legal documents that he and Dimon communicated about the convicted sex offender.

Dimon maintains he had no such conversations, the Wall Street Journal reports, while Staley claims he knew about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and that he regrets his friendship with Epstein.

According to the filing, Staley says that he and Dimon communicated when Epstein was arrested in 2006 and 2008 when Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution, and served 13 months in a work-release program. Staley also claims that Dimon communicated with him several times through 2012 about whether to maintain Epstein as a client.

Jes Staley

There is no evidence that any such communications ever occurred—nothing in the voluminous number of documents reviewed and nothing in the nearly dozen depositions taken, including that of our own CEO,” said a spokeswoman for JPMorgan, adding that Dimon doesn’t believe such conversations with Staley ever happened. “The one person who claims this to be true is currently accused of horrific acts and dishonesty.”

The statements arose as part of a pair of lawsuits against the bank in a federal court in Manhattan. The government of the U.S. Virgin Islands and an unnamed woman, who said she was abused by Epstein, sued JPMorgan last year, claiming that the bank facilitated Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking. 

The bank has sought to pin the bulk of the relationship on Staley and sued him claiming he misled executives about Epstein. The bank in its lawsuit identified Staley as the “powerful financial executive” accused of sexual assault by the woman who is suing JPMorgan. Staley’s lawyers have said the allegations against him are baseless. -WSJ

Rather than mislead anyone about what was or was not said, why don’t they just agree to release the whole transcript?” said an Epstein accuser’s attorney, Brad Edwards, referring to Dimon’s deposition.

Jeffrey Epstein, front in dark jacket, pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. Photo: Uma Sanghvi/The Palm Beach Post/ZUMA PRESS

Epstein died in jail following his 2019 arrest on federal sex-trafficking charges. The pedophile, who became a JPMorgan client around 1998 – bringing the bank hundreds of millions of dollars, formed a close bond with Staley, who eventually oversaw JPMorgan’s investment bank.

In August 2008, a few weeks after Epstein’s guilty plea, a JPMorgan employee sent an email that suggested Dimon would review the Epstein relationship, according to the U.S. Virgin Islands lawsuit. The email states, “I would count Epstein’s assets as a probable outflow for ’08 ($120mm or so?) as I can’t imagine it will stay (pending Dimon review).” 

The bank has said that there is no record of such a review and that Dimon doesn’t recall one. -JPMorgan

According to the Daily Mail, JPMorgan executive Mary Erdoes, who has been with the bank since 1996, continued to meet with Epstein for years after his conviction, and allowed him to stay on as a client despite the bank becoming aware of suspicious withdrawals as early as 2006.

Mary Erdoes

The bank finally severed ties with Epstein in 2013, citing him routinely withdrawing large amounts of cash. A 2006 report showed Epstein had withdrawn amounts as large as $80,000 several times, amounting to more than $750,000 in one year. -Daily Mail

Erdoes said during a deposition this week that she didn’t think it was her responsibility to flag Epstein’s accounts for review. Staley, her supervisor, allegedly asked Epstein about the allegations in person, the Washington Post reports – glazing over the fact that Staley and Epstein had a Disney princess-themed email exchange alluding to sex acts.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/01/2023 – 05:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3iyDVrz Tyler Durden

Does a Footnote in Sackett II Indicate How SCOTUS Will Resolve the Affirmative Action Cases?

In Sackett v. United States (Sackett II), the Supreme Court narrowed the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. In doing so, Justice Alito’s opinion for the Court adopted the interpretation of the CWA articulated in Justice Scalia’s four-justice plurality from Rapanos v. United States, and rejected the “significant nexus” test articulated in Justice Kennedy’s concurrence. This was significant because, for over fifteen years, the federal government, and most lower-courts, had embraced Justice Kennedy’s opinion as the controlling opinion. As the 1 in the Court’s 4-1-4 split, Justice Kennedy’s opinion was understood as embodying the narrowest grounds under Marks v. United States.

While most viewed Justice Kennedy’s opinion as articulating the outer bounds of federal regulatory jurisdiction under Rapanos, that was not how the case was presented to the Court, and none of the justices viewed that opinion as a controlling precedent. Wrote Justice Alito in footnote 3 of his opinion for the Court: “Neither party contends that any opinion in Rapanos controls. We agree.”

While Justices Kavanaugh and Kagan disagreed strongly with Justice Alito’s embrace of the Scalia plurality, neither contended that the Court was obligated to follow the Kennedy concurrence under principles of stare decisis. They objected to the substance of the Alito majority, not its treatment of Justice Kennedy’s Rapanos opinion.

What does any of this have to do with affirmative action? Recall that one of the key affirmative action precedents is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. This decision, like Rapanos, was a 4-1-4 decision. And just as Sackett II called upon the Court to revisit the question at issue in Rapanos, this term’s two affirmative action cases call upon the Court to revisit whether the consideration of race in university admissions is unlawful, either under the Constitution or federal statute.

Subsequent decisions have often treated Justice Powell’s Bakke concurrence—the 1 in the 4-1-4 split—as controlling, particularly on the question of whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits race-conscious admissions policies. But there was another issue in the Bakke case: How to interpret the Civil RIghts Act. As with the question in Rapanos and Sackett II, this is a question of statutory interpretation, where concerns for adherence to precedent are typically at their height. Yet in Sackett II no justice claimed that rejecting Justice Kennedy’s interpretation of the CWA in favor of the Justice Scalia plurality offended stare decisis principles.

If rejecting Justice Kennedy’s Rapanos concurrence did not offend principles of stare decisis, would not the same apply to Justice Powell’s Bakke opinion? Might this give room for the Court to revisit the  question of whether federal law bars the use of race in university admissions and to embrace the four-justice plurality from Bakke that concluded race conscious admissions vioalte the Civil Rights Act? Might this provide a way for the Court to revise the common understanding of what federal law allows without offending statutory stare decisis? We should soon see.

The post Does a Footnote in Sackett II Indicate How SCOTUS Will Resolve the Affirmative Action Cases? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/57YHcXl
via IFTTT

Beyond Textualism? on SSRN

A few months ago I linked to a lecture called “Beyond Textualism?” that I gave at Harvard Law School in the “Scalia Lecture” series—on what the core insight of textualism is and how we might extend it even in cases where the text itself is silent. I now have a written version of those remarks available on SSRN (they will be forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy).

It opens:

Last fall, I was at another law school, visiting with a friend, a co-author. So of course, we started talking about legal interpretation. I went into his office, he shut the door, and then the first thing he asked me was, “Do you think textualism has sort of played itself out?” This lecture is about the answer to that question.

and continues:

In general, the textualist revolution was correct and salutary. But it is getting to be time to solve some problems where standard textualist teaching might lead us astray. If we think of textualism, or the phrase, “the plain text,” as just mantras—prayers to ward off the demons of bad judging—we will not find salvation. We need to understand why textualism is right. If we do, then it may mean that sometimes in some cases our analysis will have to move a little bit beyond the text.

What do I mean?

The key insights of textualism are really two things: positivism and formalism. The insight of textualism is positivism in the sense that judges are supposed to follow external sources of law rather than treat jurisdiction as necessarily giving them the power to make decisions in their own discretion. When it comes to the question: What does the statute mean? or what should we do in this case where the agency or somebody else’s behavior is governed by statute? the key question judges are supposed to be asking is, what did the law say they should do? The answer comes from law outside the judge.

The argument for textualism as opposed to policymaking, for text over policy, comes from this kind of positivism. It is not the judge’s job to decide what is the best thing, all things considered, or what would make our legal order better rather than worse, all things considered. It is the judge’s job to ask what something else says about those things.

The other key insight of textualism is formalism, in the sense that it recognizes that the rule does not always match the reasons for the rule. Sometimes rules go beyond their reasons; a rule can be overbroad compared to the reasons for enacting it. And sometimes rules are underbroad; a rule cannot quite do all the things that you might want to do given the reasons for enacting the rule. Textualism recognizes that when the judge enforces the law, the law’s rule might sometimes be different from what the people who enacted the law would have wanted had they thought about the situation.

This is the argument for textualism as opposed to intentionalism. The reason to follow text rather than the imagined or even the known intent of the people who enacted the law, comes from this kind of formalism. Judges, when they’re enforcing a rule
that comes from outside themselves, might have to enforce a rule that isn’t exactly
the same as the reasons for the rule.

These two things work together. Textualism reflects an insight—central to the structure of our government and central to the fabric of our law as it has evolved in our legal system—that the job of an interpreter (let’s call her a “judge”) is usually to enforce rules that come from someplace else, not to make the rules herself and not to imagine rules that were never actually made law anywhere.

Those insights are the reasons for textualism, but those insights don’t necessarily stop at textualism. If we are going to continue to honor the basic structure of our government and of our own legal order, we are sometimes going to need to think more deeply about the jurisprudential insights that underlie textualism. The problem is that the text itself, even the text supplemented by something like the original meaning of the text, is incomplete. It gives incomplete or misleading answers to important questions about the law. It needs to be supplemented with attention to our entire legal framework because our legal system relies not just on written texts but also on an unwritten law. We need to supplement textualism with this unwritten law, law that governs both interpretation and background principles against which interpretation takes place.

Continue reading “Beyond Textualism? on SSRN”