Watch Live: Powell Speaks At The ECB Sintra Forum

Watch Live: Powell Speaks At The ECB Sintra Forum

Today at 9:30am, the main event at the ECB’s Sintra annual forum sees ECB President Lagarde (Neutral/Dovish), Fed Chair Powell (Neutral), BoE Governor Bailey (Neutral), and BoJ Governor Ueda (Dove) partake in a panel at the Sintra forum at 14:30 BST / 09:30 EDT.

Courtesy of Newsquawk, here is context ahead of today’s panel.

Fed: Given Fed Chair Powell spoke at the Humphrey Hawkins testimonies last week, and the FOMC the week before that, it is unlikely Fed Chair Powell will have anything fresh to say. However, data since has been strong (albeit not primary data like inflation or employment), particularly housing data, consumer confidence and the durable goods reports on Tuesday, which could give the Fed Chair confidence in the current dot plots for two more 25bp hikes, despite the market only pricing in one more. Powell will likely tow the familiar line that future policy decisions depend on the data, and with NFP & CPI on July 7th and 12th, respectively, ahead of the July 26th meeting, it is unlikely Powell will make firm commitments ahead of July, but he did note the July meeting was a live one at the last FOMC and markets look for a 75% probability of a 25bp hike after the “skip” in June.

ECB: Lagarde has also spoken extensively in recent days and there have been several ECB source reports, and all imply a July rate hike from the ECB is a done deal, while the odds of another hike in September are also increasing. The latest source reporting this morning noted that some ECB officials are considering a faster reduction of its bond portfolio, noting active sales of securities from the APP could be the logical next step after TLTRO loans have been fully repaid at the end of 2024, however, some were more opposed to the idea amid concerns APP sales would lead to big losses at some Eurozone central banks. Therefore it will be interesting to see if Lagarde touches on this.

BoE: The BoE last week hiked by a surprising 50bps following a hot inflation report the day before with a hawkish split, where 7 of the MPC voted for 50bps. but the usual doves Dhingra and Tenreyro (departing) opted for an unchanged decision. Into the release, market pricing was a near coin flip between either a 25 or 50bps hike, but the consensus (taken pre-CPI) was for a 25bp hike. The decision saw analysts ramp up future rate hike expectations for the peak rate, and the latest Reuters poll is for the BoE to see a peak rate of 5.5% in September, with a 25bp hike in both August and September. However, markets are pricing a peak rate of 6.0% in December – commentary from Bailey on guidance will be key, but he will likely take a data-dependent approach, stressing the need to bring inflation down and repeat BoE guidance that they are prepared to do more if necessary.

BoJ: With the BoJ maintaining its ultra-loose policy, and the Fed signalling two more rate hikes, alongside a recent US equity rally, the Yen has weakened to “intervention territory” and has prompted jaw-boning from top Japanese officials about the one-sided move in the Yen. The latest was Finance Minister Suzuki noting they will respond appropriately to excessive FX moves if necessary, but like others, did not comment on specific FX levels. At the latest BoJ meeting, policy settings were unchanged as expected, disappointing outside hawkish calls for a tweak to its YCC. while Board Member Adachi noted if the bond market function remains in the current state, the chance of tweaking YCC in July is low. Ueda noted after the BoJ that more time is needed for the bank to meet its 2% inflation target and that they do need to pay attention to financial and FX markets – so we will be attentive to any remarks from Ueda on FX today. Ueda also noted after the BoJ that responding to an inflation undershoot after a premature rate hike is more difficult than responding to an overshoot, but it is possible a large shift in the price view could result in a policy change, and that the risk of an excessive inflation overshoot with cautious policy response is not zero, but there is also a risk of inflation undershoot with hasty monetary normalization.

Watch the panel live below:

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 09:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/cYB79SW Tyler Durden

250 Hollywood Celebrities Sign Letter Demanding Big Tech Censor Anyone Who Opposes Trans Surgeries On Kids

250 Hollywood Celebrities Sign Letter Demanding Big Tech Censor Anyone Who Opposes Trans Surgeries On Kids

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Some 250 woke Hollywood celebrities from movies, TV and music have signed their names to an open letter urging big tech companies to crack down on anyone who doesn’t fall into line with the trans agenda, including advocating life changing gender surgeries on children.

The letter was sent to the CEOs of Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter by GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) and the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), and was signed by hundreds of famous names including Amy Schumer, Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato, Jamie Lee Curtis, Judd Apatow, Patrick Stewart and many more.

It states that “There has been a massive systemic failure to prohibit hate, harassment, and malicious anti-LGBTQ disinformation on your platforms and it must be addressed,” pointing to “dangerous posts (both content and ads)… targeting transgender, nonbinary, and gender non-conforming people.”

“This disinformation and hate, inadequately moderated on your platforms, plays an outsized role in the sharp increase in real-world anti-transgender targeting and violence,” it continues.

The letter further decrees “Your policies and corresponding enforcement are inadequate when it comes to mitigating harmful and dangerous anti-LGBTQ content. You must urgently take action to protect trans and LGBTQ users on your platforms (including protecting us from over-enforcement and censorship).”

The celebrities specifically cite tech companies allowing people to engage in ‘deadnaming’ and ‘misgendering’ as a “widespread mode of hate speech across all platforms, utilized to bully and harass prominent public figures while simultaneously expressing hatred and contempt.”

The letter then demands to know what the tech companies are going to do to address “Content that spreads malicious lies and disinformation about medically necessary healthcare for transgender youth.

The letter states that “Specific mitigations on such disinformation must be developed (for instance akin to election and COVID-19 mitigations and rules).”

So, essentially, censoring anyone who doesn’t completely advocate removing the genitals of children and sterilising them.

Recall that the “mitigations” employed by big tech against people who expressed opinions on the 2020 election and COVID-19 that were in any way divergent to the establishment narrative were to censor and altogether remove them from the platforms.

This included merely suggesting that the COVID lab leak theory, which is now the accepted probable reality of what happened by several government agencies and scientists, warranted an investigation.

Related:

Meanwhile, in the real world, a new poll from Summit Ministries and McLaughlin & Associates has found that 61 percent of U.S. voters believe that introducing children to transgenderism, drag shows, and LGBTQ+ themes stunts their emotional and psychological development.

The polls also found that 63 percent of respondents believe that those advocating for children to be exposed to these issues are motivated purely by a desire to push a specific cultural agenda.

further poll found that almost three quarters (73%) want businesses to stay neutral on political and cultural issues, including LGBTQ+, with just over half saying they support boycotting companies that aggressively market that agenda.

Those figures dovetail with another poll conducted by The Trafalgar Group in partnership with Convention of States Action that found 62 percent want companies to remain neutral during Pride month, and that 41 percent say they have taken part in boycotting a company for taking woke public stances.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 09:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/XP4yCZe Tyler Durden

Russia Looks Increasingly Medieval After the Coup That Wasn’t

If you’re trying to make sense of events in Russia, it might be best to frame it in medieval terms. Think of the mutiny by Prigozhin and the Wagner Group less as an attempted coup by mercenaries and more as a violent effort to extract a better deal by a warlord who was betrayed by his liege. That the feudal squabbling takes place not amidst a Game of Thrones setting of horses and swords, but with the control of nuclear weapons at stake, means that the resulting destabilization could have global repercussions.

The revolt was certainly a shock to Russian authorities, with convict-turned-caterer-turned-warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin’s Wagner Group troops reportedly making it to within 200 kilometers of Moscow before halting. They shot down aircraft from the armed forces on the way and seem to have picked up a few defecting military units. The precipitating factor was that, after months of feuding between Prigozhin and the Defense Ministry, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin decided to end Wagner’s independence.

A Betrayal with Big Repercussions

“A key trigger for Prigozhin, officials said, was a June 10 Russian Defense Ministry order that all volunteer detachments would have to sign contracts with the government,” The Washington Post reported. “Though the order did not mention Wagner Group by name, the implication was clear: a takeover of Prigozhin’s mercenary troops, who have proved essential to Russia’s military campaign in Ukraine and have helped secure some of its most notable tactical victories.”

Prigozhin more or less confirmed this take in a statement after Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko negotiated an end to the march on Moscow.

“The aim of the march was to avoid the destruction of Wagner,” Prigozhin claimed on Telegram after accusing regular military units of opening fire on Wagner formations in the days before the revolt.

But aside from leading mutineers shockingly close to the Russian capital, what was Prigozhin doing? Wagner was obviously up to the job of punching through defenses and threatening the seat of government. But taking and holding the entire country seemed desperate and unlikely. But that’s not necessarily what he intended.

Severance-Package Negotiations Through Mutiny

“The coup, if it wasn’t going to be serious, which turns out it wasn’t, was always about Prigozhin honestly just getting the best retirement package that he could,” suggests geopolitical analyst Peter Zeihan. That is, if the warlord was going to be kicked to the curb by Putin, he’d march his elite troops on Moscow and demand to be paid off before going away. Zeihan has doubts that Prigozhin will enjoy a long and peaceful retirement, but he expects that Putin and company have plenty of worries of their own.

“We now have the bulk of Wagner who have joined Prigozhin on an attempted coup. Even if Prigozhin never expected it to succeed, the soldiers followed him, and at least one unit of the air defense system within the Russian military joined him,” adds Zeihan. “That means if you are Putin, not only is the most effective fighting force you have of questionable loyalty, there’s a lot of folks in the rank and file that you don’t know if you can trust anymore.”

Russia’s reliance on Wagner is clear from Putin’s offer to the mutineers “to continue your service to Russia by signing a contract with the Defence Ministry or other law enforcement or security agency or return home. Those who want to are free to go to Belarus” with Prigozhin. That’s not a generous offer from a victor, but a desperate one from a man with a shaky grip on the throne.

A Weakened Grip on the Throne

“Strong leaders are not usually the targets of coup attempts,” notes Edward Lucas, writing for the Center for European Policy Analysis. “It was also telling that so few heavyweights rallied to Putin’s side. Many regime insiders and other bigwigs seem to have thought that the coup had a chance of succeeding, and waited to see what would happen…. The outlook for Russia is now grim. Prigozhin’s march on Moscow may have failed, but the conditions that fostered it remain. Others will be mulling their chances.”

“Things remain together, just, but only so long as everyone fears Putin most,” agrees Francisco Toro, at Persuasion. “And that’s why last weekend’s bizarre mini-crisis in Russia has destabilized the Putin system as consequentially as it has. For one fleeting moment, just one mad-cap afternoon, Vladimir Putin was not the man Russians feared most.”

The result is that Yevgeny Prigozhin has an uncertain refuge in Belarus under the “protection,” such as it is, of Lukashenko. Putin has an equally uncertain grip on power in Moscow. The result is almost certain to be instability in Russia as the previously unchallengeable ruler looks unexpectedly vulnerable a year and a half after setting out to expand his empire with the invasion of Ukraine.

“Russia’s next civil war has already started,” claims Lucas. “As it deepens, Russia’s civil war is unlikely to be a territorial conflict, as in the fighting that followed the Bolshevik revolution…. This one is between gangsters: feuding clans eager to hold on to their own wealth and perhaps gain assets from their rivals.”

“For Vladimir Putin to survive in power he will need to patch up the holes in his now badly tattered aura of menace,” writes Toro. “I can’t tell you exactly how he’ll do that. But I can tell you this: it’s going to be ugly.”

Big Stakes for the World

This increased uncertainty has enormous implications beyond Russia, given that the country has the world’s largest nuclear forces and a diminished, but still substantial, international presence. The country is the world’s largest exporter of wheat and a major source of petroleum and other resources. That means chaos in Russia is likely to contribute even more pain to a world already disrupted by the invasion of Ukraine and the economic sanctions imposed by the West in response. Worse than a medieval power struggle in the age of swords and castles, a similar conflict now implicates control over vast wealth and destructive power.

There is one party that likely finds comfort in Prigozhin’s power play and the resulting turmoil: Ukrainians. While Ukraine has punched above its weight in resisting invasion, the country suffers terribly from the war. The withdrawal of Wagner troops from the fighting and the mutineers’ seizure of the Russian military headquarters in Rostov-on-Don have boosted Ukraine’s military operations.

“Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations and advanced on at least two sectors of the front as of June 26,” according to the Institute for the Study of War. “The UK [Ministry of Defense] indicated on June 26 that Russian forces likely lack operational-level reserves that could reinforce against simultaneous Ukrainian threats on multiple areas of the front hundreds of kilometers from each other, chiefly Bakhmut and southern Ukraine.”

In chaos there is opportunity. That opportunity is clear for besieged defenders in Ukraine. But it’s also an opportunity for the return of a more uncertain and overtly brutal world in which old-style warlords gamble with very high stakes.

The post Russia Looks Increasingly Medieval After the Coup That Wasn’t appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/EUluJGa
via IFTTT

Modern Currency Policy: Nations Compete Citizens Suffer

Modern Currency Policy: Nations Compete, Citizens Suffer

Authored by Matthew Piepenburg via GoldSwitzerland.com,

Below we consider how modern currency policy may not be so good for, well, the people…

This is why gold inevitably enters the conversation, for unlike policy makers, this old pet rock garners more trust.

Gold, of course, loves chaos, tanking currencies and cornered, debt-soaked nations, the numbers of which rise with each passing day.

We see currency debasement as mathematically and historically inevitable, though we have no clue (no one really does) as to the precise date, trigger or time the already teetering fiat money systems fall over the global debt cliff.

We only know that the $300+T cliff is here, and that nations are racing toward it at historical speed, with equally historical consequences.

Physical gold holders, however, enjoy a certain and calm advantage: They don’t need to be precise timers; simply patient owners.

As for more signs of the move toward weakening currencies in general, and a weakening USD in particular, let’s look at some more history and current facts.

Hot vs. Financial Wars: Today’s Evidence, Tomorrow’s Polices

As headlines change with daily Western biases regarding the military war in Ukraine, America’s financial war with the East (i.e., China) will continue into the next generation.

It’s no secret to me, or many others, moreover, that the war in the Ukraine is a US proxy war against Russia, in which Ukraine (and its citizens) are merely a convenient battering ram against Putin.

That’s just my opinion, but we’ve seen this “freedom” movie before. Many times, and in many countries, none of which ended with much “freedom” …

But as to financial wars, they too are just an extension of politics by another means, and with the growing waves of de-dollarization rising in speed and height following the predictable ripple of effects of the 2022 sanctions against Russia, there is much which can be deduced today about the Realpolitik of the USD and its weakening future.

Is the Fed Watching China? Yep.

DC, of course, may not admit to the rise of China (growth and trade) and the slow decline of USD hegemony, but the facts and trends I’ve recently described are not escaping them.

So how will the USA fight its financial war with Beijing?

If history and math are any guides, much will hinge upon the USD, which means we can expect it to get weaker over time, despite inevitable peaks along the way.

Again, let’s consider the past as prologue.

The Rising Sun

I was playing little league baseball when Japan made its slow and steady rise into the 1980’s. But even I noticed more things, from Michael Douglas films to pop music, were “turning Japanese” in that decade of MTV fashions.

Japan’s rising sun seemed to have no end as Tokyo-based financiers were buying up everything from California real estate to the Rockefeller Center in NYC.

The Setting Sun

But fast-forward to 1989 and the Nikkei implosion, and that same Japanese sun was beginning to set.

By the mid-90’s, I was a young law student in Boston (never made the Red Sox roster) reviewing lease modifications in a Rockefeller Center which the Japanese could no longer afford.

In short: Things can change quite fast in the rise and fall of financial empires.

But it wasn’t just exuberant market bubbles which brought Japan down.

During the 90’s, the US was deliberately weakening the USD to reduce the warp speed of Japanese trade and economic growth.

At the acme of this hidden financial war, the yen had appreciated 46% against an intentionally devalued Greenback.

In short: Uncle Sam squeezed Japan.

The Rising China

China is clearly the next target (or “Japan”) for US financial war-gamers.

And it’s my strong opinion that among the many advantages and realities of a falling USD ahead, the hidden planners in DC are adding the desire to cripple Chinese growth as yet another reason (besides inflating away debt or combatting a denied recession) to weaken the USD.

In the 1980’s, for example, nations like Japan and Germany (whom, ironically, the USA helped defeat in a prior world war) had slowly and steadily emerged from the dust of the 1940’s with current account surpluses and hence rising domestic demand, which meant rising local currencies.

The Fed, at that time, saw an opportunity to end its “war on inflation” narrative and commence weakening the USD in the name of “growth,” but it was no coincidence that such measures (and narratives) also sealed the fate of a rising Japan whose yen was made too strong to compete on the global stage.

Today, I see a similar pattern emerging between the US and China.

Although the Fed has yet to officially abandon its “war” on an inflation disaster which they had previously (i.e., wrongly/dishonestly) described as transitory,” they know the USD is and was too strong for its own good, and they also know that China and Russia are making deals which threaten US trade and settlement superiority.

In short: The US needs to fight ugly again, and to do, they need an uglier/weaker dollar.

Thus, in the coming months, quarters and years, when the rate hikes of late (paused for now, but promised for later?) keep on breaking things (see below), the inevitable pretext for an otherwise bad habit of debasing, printing and weakening the USD will become too tempting for the mouse-click-money-addicted central planners in Washington to ignore.

Stated even more simply: The pivot to easy money is only a matter of time, for in addition to needing an inflationary money-printer to stay alive (and print-away debt), DC also needs a weaker USD to beat a rising East.

Of course, in such a war, the greatest casualties will come from a Main Street earning weaker dollars…

US Bonds: The First to Fall in a Financial Cold War

On a real basis, that is to say, when measured against inflation (which will rise and fall, but ultimately stick around for years to come), the US reality will thus involve one in which bonds, in an inflation-adjusted context, will be sacrificed (vs. the CNY) if the US intends to engage in any kind of plausible financial war with China and others.

Or stated more simply, US bonds, having enjoyed an artificial, Fed-tailwind for over 40 years, will be the first troops (along with investors, IRAs and 401Ks) sacrificed in the financial combat of nations now firing their cannons on a world stage changing faster than the German Blitzkrieg through France or Ney’s calvary charge at Waterloo…

When one adds weaker bonds to a debased currency, the net result is bad for the average citizen as Uncle Sam plays its financial war games with China.

Hot War?

Of course, there is also the omni-present risk of a financial war turning into a hot war with China.

Though unthinkable in a nuclear era, such risks change the entire argument, and at such points, financial forecasting and planning (or reports like this) will be less of a priority than simply finding drinkable water.

Perhaps I’m naive, but I believe that such worst-case scenarios are too insane and stupid even for the policy makers and neocons in DC.

Besides, and as Michael Mullen said over a decade ago from the Joint Chiefs of Staff: How could America, who borrows money from China, which it then uses to build weapons to potentially fight China, actually go to war with China, where the vast majority of the components necessary for those very same weapons are made?

Ahhhh. We do love in interesting times, don’t we?

Waiting for the Pivot as More Things Break

For now, and assuming no nuclear Armageddon (which I don’t wish to consider), we can only sit back and wait as a totally fork-tongued and cornered Powell plays with markets, currencies and interest rates like a child playing with matches.

As for Capitalism, it died long ago. Instead, the Fed IS the market.

Powell’s far too fast and too-high rate hikes of 2022-23 (made far too late) have done a modest bit to “fight” inflation, but have been far more effective in murdering US bond demand and regional banks—as well as ensuring a recession, which I suppose, is one crazy way to “beat” inflation…

Big Trouble for Little Britain

In addition to prompting the world to turn away from the USD and Uncle Sam’s USTs, Powell’s hikes also forced the UK (BOE) to follow the rate-hike trend, which caused an implosion in their gilt market in October of 2022.

As I’ve said many times, with financial allies like the US, who needs enemies?

But the pain in the UK goes beyond just 2022 gilt markets or a Royal Duchess seeking photo opps at US polo tournamentsin 2023.

The Bank of England, chasing its tale as well as Fed policy, has just been forced to raise rates to 5% in what the BBC and Bloomberg prompt-readers recently described as a 50 bp “surprise move.”

In more honest reporting, or at least more blunt reporting, my view on the “surprise” rate hike is that it is (and was) no “surprise” at all.

In fact, such sudden, frequent and steepening rate hikes are nothing new or “surprising” to over-indebted emerging market nations, of which the UK, and the US, are no exception.

That is, the US and UK are just glorified banana republics once one looks honestly at their national balance sheets.

Thus, the UK is simply raising rates higher and faster to save an otherwise dying currency, and in doing so, are breaking everything else in their current path.

Already, over 1.2 million UK households have been made insolvent this year due to higher mortgage payments.

As BOE rates rise, bond prices fall and hence gilt yields (like mortgage payments) are now rising like shark fins toward scary levels seen last autumn.

In short, and as we warned of the US, you folks in the UK are going to need a bigger boat very soon…

Keep It Simple

The foregoing geopolitical, currency, and policy facts all suggest a world leaning further and further toward deliberate tweaking (strengthening and then debasing) of their fiat currencies to stay alive as well as “competitive” in a race to the fiat finish line in which all the horses are effectively cantering toward a glue factory.

As such trends continue, the question will not be about which currency you hold, but how much of it is backed by gold.

If nations won’t back that paper money in something precious, then investors can do it for themselves by owning physical gold.

It’s just that simple.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 07:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/7d1epgR Tyler Durden

Cruise Ships Become “Breeding Ground” For Norovirus As Outbreaks Hit Decade-High

Cruise Ships Become “Breeding Ground” For Norovirus As Outbreaks Hit Decade-High

Vacation-starved Americans have flocked back to cruise ships after shunning this form of travel during the virus pandemic. Some cruise lines, such as Royal Caribbean Group, have reported occupancy rates around 100% capacity in the first quarter of 2023. The surge in popularity also means the rise of norovirus incidents on ships. 

The Wall Street Journal said 13 outbreaks of the ‘cruise ship virus’ have been reported this year. The data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows this is the largest number of norovirus incidents on cruise ships in a single year since 2012. And still, the year is only halfway over. 

Norovirus can quickly spread in a cruise ship via particles from poop, vomit, and contaminated surfaces from people who have contracted the sickness. 

“If you get norovirus illness, you can shed billions of norovirus particles that you can’t see without a microscope.

“It only takes a few norovirus particles to make you and other people sick,” according to the CDC. 

The latest incident occurred last Tuesday when a Viking North American Cruise vessel docked in New Jersey had more than 100 passengers who contracted the virus. A cruise ship operated by Celebrity Cruises had more than 175 people contract the virus in May. 

A spokeswoman for the Cruise Lines International Association said cruise ships have to report illnesses to CDC, which has provided ” visibility and faster reporting to health authorities” about outbreaks. 

The rebound of the cruise industry this year coincides with a surge in norovirus outbreaks on ships that causes people to vomit violently and have diarrhea. 

 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 06:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/6PzA4Zg Tyler Durden

Norway’s Wealth Tax Is Backfiring. Are Americans Paying Attention?

Norway’s Wealth Tax Is Backfiring. Are Americans Paying Attention?

By John Miltimore of the American Institute for Economic Research

In 2022 Norway’s third richest man, Kjell Inge Røkke, announced in an open letter to shareholders he was moving to Lugano, Switzerland.

“My capital will continue working in Norway,” wrote the fishing magnate turned industrialist who launched his empire four decades ago with a 69-foot trawler he bought while saving money working on ships off the coast of Alaska.

Røkke, who Forbes estimates has a fortune of $5.1 billion, will cost the Norwegian government an estimated 175,000,000 kroner annually (roughly $16 million) with his departure. That might not sound like a lot of money, but Røkke is not the only wealthy entrepreneur leaving Norway, The Guardian notes. 

“More than 30 Norwegian billionaires and multimillionaires left Norway in 2022, according to research by the newspaper Dagens Naeringsliv,” reports wealth correspondent Rupert Neate. “This was more than the total number of super-rich people who left the country during the previous 13 years, [the paper] added.”

Did you catch that? More “super rich” Norwegians left Norway in 2022 than during the previous 13 years combined. The reason wealthy Norwegians are fleeing the country is not a secret. 

Following its 2021 electoral victory, the Nordic nation’s Labor Party made good on its promise to soak the rich. Norway is one of just a handful of OECD countries that still taxes net wealth, and the Labor Party increased the country’s wealth tax to 1.1 percent despite warnings that such a move would “trigger capital flight and threaten job creation.”

Capital flight is exactly what happened, and it has left the Norwegian government with less revenue. 

Norwegian Business School professor emeritus Ole Gjems-Onstad estimated that the wealthy Norwegians took with them a total fortune of $54 billion when they left. This means that the wealth tax, which was projected to increase revenue by nearly $150 million annually, will result in about 40 percent less revenue than it currently generates. Luca Dellanna, a management advisor and author, points out that Norway collected about $1.46 billion on its wealth tax in 2019. But the exodus of the wealthy will result in an estimated $594 million in lost revenue.

Those trying to understand how Norway’s policy could backfire so badly should look to the work of the late Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Lucas. Lucas, a longtime professor at the University of Chicago, received the top prize in economics for research that became known as the Lucas Critique, which exposed various problems with macroeconomic modeling.

Lucas believed that to predict policy outcomes it was essential to first grasp that all action is individual behavior, and humans are rational creatures who will respond to policies in rational ways — even to policies designed to fool them.

“Microeconomics assumed people were rational,” economist David R. Henderson pointed out in a recent Wall Street Journal article following Lucas’s death. “Why shouldn’t macroeconomics make the same assumption?” 

This insight helped Lucas win the Nobel Prize, and it helps explain why Norway’s wealth tax backfired so badly. It was always naive to assume wealthy individuals would continue to bear Norway’s wealth tax. After all, one needn’t have a PhD in economics to realize that wealthy people are unlikely to sit idly by as lawmakers take more and more of their wealth (not income, mind you, wealth). As early as the 17th century, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the finance minister to France’s Louis XIV, observed the delicate nature of taxation. 

“The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing,” wrote Colbert.

Norwegian lawmakers forgot this simple lesson, and now they can do little but watch as the wealth creators in their country depart, taking with them their capital, ingenuity, and taxable income.

“Atlas shrugs in Norway,” observed economist Peter St Onge. 

Indeed. 

As it happens, Norway’s unfortunate lack of foresight comes at an opportune time for those living in the United States, where many are pushing wealth taxes. 

Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported on the creative methods federal and state lawmakers are devising to separate “the rich” from their wealth. These include no fewer than four states attempting to tax unrealized capital gains, including a California proposal that would impose a 1.5 percent wealth tax (even higher than Norway’s).

“If it’s an annual wealth tax, it’s taking a fraction of your wealth every year,” Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez, who helped design Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax proposal, told the Post. “Almost by definition, you’re going to have less wealth after you pay the tax.”

If professor Saez believes California’s wealthiest people will allow lawmakers to tax their wealth and make them sell shares to cover unrealized capital gains, he hasn’t learned Colbert’s lesson on taxation.

Such a policy wouldn’t just result in a great deal of hissing. It would lead to a mass exodus of wealth creators. Anyone who doubts this need only look to Norway.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 06:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/NX09ki2 Tyler Durden

Solar Cycle 25’s Maximum Might Arrive Earlier And Hit Harder

Solar Cycle 25’s Maximum Might Arrive Earlier And Hit Harder

Solar Cycle 25 has been underway since April 2019. Ever since the cycle began, the sun has become more active, unleashing solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and geomagnetic storms, with at least one scientist warning solar maximum could arrive ahead of schedule, and that’s not great news for the digital economy here on Earth. 

The current solar cycle has a forecasted peak sometime in 2025. In December 2022, the total number of sunspots was at its highest in eight years, indicating solar activity was ramping up. Earlier this year, scientists observed twice as many sunspots — red flags that solar maximum could be nearing.

Another indication of increased solar activity is the number and intensity of solar flares:

In 2022, there were fivefold more C-class and M-class solar flares than there were in 2021, and year on year, the number of the most powerful, X-class solar flares is also increasing, according to SpaceWeatherLive.com. The first half of 2023 logged more X-class flares than in all of 2022, and at least one has directly hit Earth. (Solar flare classes include A, B, C, M and X, with each class being at least 10 times more powerful than the previous one.) — Live Science 

Over the years, we’ve explained solar flares can spark geomagnetic storms and cause disruptions to satellites and even power grids. 

Risks Solar Storms Pose On Modern Economy 

What’s concerning is a solar physicist at the University of College London, Alex James, told Live Science that the sun’s increase in solar activity is a warning sign the solar maximum could arrive by the end of this year. He said the initial forecast was for 2025. 

All this evidence suggests that Solar Cycle 25 is “going to peak earlier, and it’s going to peak higher than expected,” James said. 

Other solar physicists have told the science publication very similar forecasts. They warned: “We are poorly prepared.”

The federal government became increasingly serious about potential grid-down events produced by solar storms with a 2016 executive order signed by the Obama Administration titled “Coordinating Efforts to Prepare the Nation for Space Weather Events.”  

And remember, “Solar Storms Can Devastate Entire Civilizations.”

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 05:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/qwDWuh4 Tyler Durden

Enormous Power Grab: France Germnay Want To End Veto Rights In The EU This Year

Enormous Power Grab: France, Germnay Want To End Veto Rights In The EU This Year

Via Remix News,

Smaller nations fear an end of sovereignty as the EU races to centralize powers away from nation states…

In what may be the beginning of the end for European nations, Germany and France are determined to reform national rights, including the EU right of veto, this year. The debate has caused a stir in recent months, and in recent weeks, the measure has been put back on the agenda.

France and Germany are convinced that a large-scale institutional reform of the European Union, including the abolition of the veto on European Council votes, could be achieved this year, French EU Affairs Minister Laurence Boone and German Minister of State Anna Lührmann told Euractiv.

“This is one of the options we want to explore in order to maintain our position as a global player with the EU’s common foreign and security policy,” Lührmann said.

He added that “it would be an important signal in other policy areas if we were to move to qualified majority voting already this year” and expressed confidence that this would happen.

The two ministers said that both countries consider it important to abolish unanimous voting in the European Council in areas such as foreign policy and taxation before the enlargement of the European Union. This could mean, for example, that Brussels would be able to implement a flat tax rate across the EU or even involve itself more deeply in the war, both moves that Hungary has rejected and in some cases even deployed its veto to stop.

Paris and Berlin claim abolishing the veto is a change that is possible without amending the EU treaties, a point hotly contested by a number of European parties, as it would not only give Brussels enormous power but also the largest states, such as Germany and France. This would subsequently allow for the EU to enact a liberal immigration policy, green rules and various other progressive goals without any hindrance from Hungary and other smaller, conservative nations.

The introduction of qualified majority voting would remove the veto on foreign policy issues, which would mean that only 15 of the 27 member states — representing 65 percent of the EU’s population — would have to agree to make particularly important foreign and defense policy decisions affecting the EU as a whole.

Laurence Boone told Euractiv that this would be “an important step toward greater integration and efficiency.”

However, the nature of such a system would favor countries with larger populations, such as France or Germany, while smaller states, such as Hungary, would lose the opportunity to have a say in EU decision-making.

Abolishing the principle of unanimity — in those areas where it still exists — for votes in the European Council would be tantamount to taking away the sovereignty of Poland and other smaller states. Ryszard Legutko, a member of the European Parliament from Poland’s ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, has previously spoken about this. However, Polish President Andrzej Duda has also been a scathing critic of the proposal. He stated that “it would be wrong for any member state to blackmail the others, including the EU candidate countries, by blocking further enlargement of the community if its hegemonic demands are not met.”

The Polish president noted that the founding principle of the EU was brotherhood and cooperation to ensure peace and economic development. For this to be possible, Duda said, “All countries must have a say on key issues affecting the development of the Community so that they feel that there is justice within the Community and that no country imposes its will at the expense of others by using institutional means.”

Herbert Kickl, president of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), currently the most popular party in Austria, believes that Brussels’ aim is to create a centralist superstate in which member states increasingly lose their importance and self-determination

“They want to take more and more powers away from the nation states and transfer them to Brussels to create a United States of Europe over the heads of its citizens,” said Kickl.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 05:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BkngwsJ Tyler Durden

These Are The Top 10 Nations By GDP-Per-Capita

These Are The Top 10 Nations By GDP-Per-Capita

There are many ways to measure different economies against one another, but comparing countries by GDP per capita remains one of the most tried-and-true methods.

As Visual Capitalists’ Pallavi Rao details below, GDP per capita attempts to level the playing field by dividing a country’s economic output by its population, effectively giving the average GDP per person. A higher per capita GDP generally corresponds to higher income, consumption levels, and standards of living.

The simplicity of this metric also makes it useful for economists and policymakers to communicate levels of economic well-being to the public.

The graphic below from theWORLDMAPS ranks the top 10 countries by per capita GDP in different regions, using data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Top 10 Countries by GDP Per Capita in the World

Here are the top 10 countries with the highest nominal GDP per capita in the world in 2023, measured in U.S. dollars:

Luxembourg, Ireland, and Norway lead the ranking with more than $100,000 in GDP per capita. Luxembourg is a key financial services center in Europe, Ireland is headquarters to many multinational corporations, and Norway is one of the largest energy exporters in the region, explaining their relative prosperity.

Wealthy countries with smaller populations tend to make up the world’s richest ranks. According to the IMF, Luxembourg only has slightly more than 600,000 people which would be a small city in more populous countries. In fact, in the top 10, only the U.S. and Australia have a population of more than 10 million.

Introducing Purchasing Power Parity

One of the major drawbacks of using GDP per capita is that it doesn’t account for the strength of the local currency versus its exchange rate, the latter of which is heavily influenced by investment flows and demand for the national currency.

Non-tradable goods in a country (haircuts, local transport, schools, etc.) do not get valued when using an exchange-rate conversion. It also doesn’t account for the price differences between countries—for example, fresh vegetables in India are far cheaper than in Canada.

To solve this problem, economists utilize purchasing power parity (PPP) indexes. A key element of these indexes is that they remove these price differences and convert into a common currency in order to show relative economic prosperity. Popular examples are The Economist’s Big Mac index and the Wall Street Journal’s Latte Index.

Nominal vs. PPP-adjusted GDP Per Capita

In the case of GDP, PPP measurements use an “international dollar” which can buy the same amount of goods in any given country as a U.S. dollar could buy in America.

Immediately, there are a few noticeable differences in the top 10 countries by GDP per capita when adjusted for PPP. For one, most countries’ values have increased from their nominal value (except for the U.S. since it is the benchmark).

Some countries have switched ranks in the top 10, such as Ireland and Luxembourg. Others have been replaced all together, with Iceland, Denmark, and Australia falling out of the top 10, replaced by Macao, the UAE, and San Marino.

We can also see how the different calculations of GDP per capita affect the rankings in other regions:

Rank (PPP) Region Country PPP (Intl $) Nominal ($)
1 Americas 🇺🇸 United States $80,030 $80,030
2 Americas 🇬🇾 Guyana $60,650 $20,540
3 Americas 🇨🇦 Canada $60,180 $52,720
4 Americas 🇦🇼 Aruba $49,630 $33,090
5 Americas 🇧🇸 The Bahamas $43,910 $35,460
6 Americas 🇵🇷 Puerto Rico $43,840 $38,570
7 Americas 🇵🇦 Panama $40,180 $17,350
8 Americas 🇹🇹 Trinidad & Tobago $32,050 $19,860
9 Americas 🇰🇳 Saint Kitts & Nevis $29,660 $17,860
10 Americas 🇨🇱 Chile $29,610 $17,830
1 Africa 🇸🇨 Seychelles $39,660 $19,540
2 Africa 🇲🇺 Mauritius $29,160 $11,550
3 Africa 🇱🇾 Libya $24,600 $6,760
4 Africa 🇧🇼 Botswana $19,400 $7,270
5 Africa 🇬🇦 Gabon $19,200 $9,290
6 Africa 🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea $18,510 $9,780
7 Africa 🇪🇬 Egypt $16,980 $3,640
8 Africa 🇿🇦 South Africa $16,090 $6,490
9 Africa 🇩🇿 Algeria $13,510 $4,480
10 Africa 🇹🇳 Tunisia $13,270 $4,070
1 Asia 🇸🇬 Singapore $133,890 $91,100
2 Asia 🇶🇦 Qatar $124,830 $83,890
3 Asia 🇲🇴 Macao SAR $89,560 $50,570
4 Asia 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates $88,220 $49,450
5 Asia 🇧🇳 Brunei Darussalam $75,580 $35,100
6 Asia 🇭🇰 Hong Kong SAR $74,600 $52,430
7 Asia 🇹🇼 Taiwan $73,340 $33,910
8 Asia 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia $64,840 $29,920
9 Asia 🇧🇭 Bahrain $60,600 $28,390
10 Asia 🇰🇷 South Korea $56,710 $33,390
1 Europe 🇮🇪 Ireland $145,200 $114,580
2 Europe 🇱🇺 Luxembourg $142,490 $132,370
3 Europe 🇨🇭 Switzerland $87,960 $98,770
4 Europe 🇳🇴 Norway $82,650 $101,100
5 Europe 🇸🇲 San Marino $78,930 $52,950
6 Europe 🇩🇰 Denmark $73,390 $68,830
7 Europe 🇳🇱 Netherlands $72,970 $61,100
8 Europe 🇮🇸 Iceland $69,780 $75,180
9 Europe 🇦🇹 Austria $69,500 $56,800
10 Europe 🇦🇩 Andorra $69,000 $44,390
1 Oceania 🇦🇺 Australia $65,370 $64,960
2 Oceania 🇳🇿 New Zealand $54,050 $48,830
3 Oceania 🇵🇼 Palau $16,390 $14,800
4 Oceania 🇫🇯 Fiji $15,730 $5,890
5 Oceania 🇳🇷 Nauru $11,340 $11,830
6 Oceania 🇹🇴 Tonga $7,120 $5,420
7 Oceania 🇼🇸 Samoa $6,320 $4,440
8 Oceania 🇹🇻 Tuvalu $5,800 $6,010
9 Oceania 🇲🇭 Marshall Islands $4,670 $5,160
10 Oceania 🇵🇬 Papua New Guinea $4,520 $3,520

The Americas and Europe

The U.S. leads the Americas in both nominal and PPP-adjusted per capita GDP. However, Canada drops to 3rd place under the new metric, overtaken by Guyana.

In Europe, the usual suspects in the world’s top 10 populate most of the region’s ranks. However, Andorra slides in at 10th in Europe’s richest countries by GDP per capita (PPP). Andorra in particular benefits from its status as a free economic zone—very low or no taxes—and being a tourism hotspot with the sector contributing 80% to its economy.

Asia

Singapore, Qatar, Macao, the UAE, and Hong Kong claim top spots as Asia’s richest countries on both lists. Qatar and the UAE benefit from oil being a key export of the region, while Singapore and are top financial centers of Asia. Macao—where gambling is legal—is a massive tourism draw.

On the other hand, Israel and Japan drop out of the richest countries in Asia when using PPP calculations, with countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain edging them out.

Africa and Oceania

The island nations of Seychelles and Mauritius lead the ranks of countries by GDP per capita in both nominal and PPP categories on the African continent, also thanks to their booming tourism industries.

Traditional African economic heavyweight South Africa also features in this list of Africa’s richest. But Egypt, the region’s third largest economy, only makes the top 10 countries by GDP when adjusted for PPP, otherwise weighed down by its large population.

And in Oceania, adjusting GDP for purchasing power doesn’t have much effect on the sizable gap between Australia and New Zealand and their smaller island neighbors. But some local economies are noticeably stronger when adjusting for PPP, especially Fiji‘s, which has a GDP per capita (PPP) three times bigger than its nominal value.

The Drawbacks of GDP Per Capita

GDP per capita is a useful measure, but it also comes with its own set of caveats.

For one, it is a measurement of economic output per person, not individual income or household savings. That gives it clear limitations in certain cases, such as in Ireland, where the presence of multinational corporations obfuscates the general output per person.

Secondly, countries with smaller populations do better in the rankings. Most of the world’s biggest economies (China, India, UK, France) do not find themselves in the top 10 ranks.

Finally, other metrics for a good standard of living, some of them intangible in economic terms—human rights, freedom of expression—are not accounted for at all.

 

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/28/2023 – 04:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/fOdunQF Tyler Durden