NYC Mayor Compares Constituent To A Slave Owner In Response To Criticism

NYC Mayor Compares Constituent To A Slave Owner In Response To Criticism

Submitted by ‘BlueApples’,

Eric Adams’ quintessential brash attitude was initially an attribute that cultivated a sense of commonality with the New Yorkers who voted to make him the city’s 110th mayor. Since he took office, that defiance and hard headedness in the wake of a seemingly endless carousel of controversies has seen the city’s attitude on the mayor sour. Time after time, Adams’ has come off overly defensive and dismissive of criticisms. The latest episode in that pattern of behavior came at a community panel discussion the mayor hosted in hosted at Gregorio Luperon High School for Science and Mathematics in Washington Heights.

The event followed last week’s vote by the NYC Rent Board to approve rent increases of up to 6% for one-year residential leases on rent-stabilized apartments. The board approved that increase by a 5-4 vote, which Adams’ subsequently praised, drawing the ire of one of the attendees of the even in Washington Heights. When she rose form her seat to chastise Adams for the Rent Board’s decision, the mayor responded in kind by lashing out at the woman, demanding her respect. He continued on in lambasting the guest by playing the race card an equating the disgruntled, now presumable former supporter of his, as a slave own, saying “I’m the mayor of this city and [you should] treat me with the respect that I would deserve to be treated [with]. Don’t treat someone like they’re on the plantation that you own.”

Of course, the irony that someone who owns a property would be complaining about a rent increases was lost on Adams’ as he reveled in the applause from those onlooking and continued on with his tangent by insisting that everyone know that he is a grown man before finally moving onto the next question. Initially, the women who became Adams’ target had interjected into a question being asked during the event as she couldn’t contain herself from chastising the major for his hypocrisy on the rent increases.

What doesn’t help the optics of Adams’ outburst is who exactly he was playing the race card with. It turns out that Jeanie Dubnau, the women who faced the mayor’s scorn, fled Europe to escape Nazi Germany before settling in NYC. Since the 84 year old fled the Third Reich, she has been a pillar of her community in the city, working as a tenants advocate for decades. Given her advocacy on the very issue of rent increases faced by residential tenants, it’s no surprise that Dubnau was composed in her response to Adams’ inappropriate decorum.

When asked to respond to the controversy she unexpectedly found herself enveloped in, Dubnau swiftly pointed to Adams’ response as a mechanism to deflect away from the issue at hand, refocuses the dialogue back to why she confronted the mayor in the first place. “The main point is that the mayor has shown he’s an enemy of all the rent stabilized tenants in New York City,” she opined, going on to say “He probably is aware how the entire tenant population and many working class people have turned against him with time.”

While Adams’ may have though he got the best of the 84 year-old, he wasn’t aware that this wasn’t her first rodeo. In 2015, Dubnau squared off with then-mayor Bill de Blasio at the same forum hosted in Washington Heights over affordable housing initiatives she was concerned would displace local business owners in increasingly gentrified neighborhoods. Adamant in response to Adams, Dubnau made it clear this wouldn’t be her lost rodeo either, stating that she will continue to call out the mayor as much as she can.

Before the Rent Board’s final vote, Adams had opposed the premise of a possible cap of 7% for rent increases for two-year leases. He quickly changed his rune when the board approved the 6% cap, saying “I want to thank the members of the Rent Guidelines Board for their critically important and extremely difficult work protecting tenants from unsustainable rent increases, while also ensuring small property owners have the necessary resources to maintain their buildings,” in a public remark following the passage of the measure that saw the city approve rent creases of over 3% for the first time since the Bloomberg administration.

While rent in NYC had reached lows following the mass exodus from the city following the authoritarian dictate of Adam’s predecessor Bill de Blasio during his handling of COVID-19, prices have since returned with avengeance. In March, the median rent price in Manhattan had risen YoY for an 18th straight month, approaching record highs. With the latest decision of the NYC Rent Board on the books, it appears that trend is sure to continue.

That is of course, unless the leadership of Eric Adams can somehow change the course of this troubling turn of events to help the New Yorkers who elected him under the promise of revitalizing the city deal with the on-going perils of inflation and cost-of-living increases that have made living in the Big Apple untenable for so many. Given Adams’ conduct when the reality of the city’s disapproval of his administration was brought to him by a constituent that embodied the vigor and wherewithal of the spirit of the city, it will be hard for New Yorkers to have faith that their mayor will have their backs. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 09:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ejbJrK9 Tyler Durden

Biden Close To Approving Cluster Bombs Banned In 120 Countries For Ukraine

Biden Close To Approving Cluster Bombs, Banned In 120 Countries, For Ukraine

President Biden is said to be close to approving controversial cluster munitions for Ukraine. CNN on Friday cites administration sources to say he is “strongly considering” approval of the transfer. 

“Officials told CNN that a final decision is expected soon from the White House, and that if approved, the weapons could be included in a new military aid package to Ukraine as soon as next month,” the report says.

“These would undoubtedly have a significant battlefield impact,” a US official said to the outlet. CNN further acknowledges that “Cluster munitions, which the US has stockpiled in large numbers since phasing them out in 2016, could help fill that gap, officials said.”

The White House would likely receive significant support from bipartisan lawmakers in Congress, given that’s precisely where the initiative to supply Kiev with cluster munitions originated. 

In March a Republican letter to the president chastised the White House’s “reluctance to provide Ukraine the right type and amount of long-range fires and maneuver capability to create.”

That particular letter had been signed by influential, high-level GOP Congress members, including: Jim Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mike McCaul, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Mike Rogers the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

Many Republicans have remained among the most outspoken hawks when it comes to a muscular approach, and massive spending, for anti-Russia efforts in Ukraine. Another, bipartisan letter from Congress was penned last week and submitted Friday

But the push to send the artillery-delivered cluster bombs has intensified within the U.S. administration and on Capitol Hill as the Pentagon has sent—or is prepared to send—weapons at the top of Ukraine’s checklist, starting with howitzers and culminating with F-16 fighter jets. And with Russia successfully clinging to dragon-toothed trench lines, that push is getting stronger. 

“Transferring DPICMs to Ukraine presents an opportunity to provide the Ukrainian Armed Forces with a powerful capability to use against the Russian army and mercenary forces,” the lawmakers wrote to Biden on Friday. “Let us use this untapped, vast arsenal in service of Ukrainian victory, and reclaiming Europe’s peace.” The letter was sent to Biden before Wagner Group chief Yevgeny Prigozhin staged an abortive mutiny against Russian President Vladimir Putin that managed to take control of a Kremlin military logistics hub in Rostov-on-Don over the weekend before petering out. 

Washington “reluctance” on cluster bombs stems from the fact that some 120 countries have banned cluster munitions as they have long been understood to be more indiscriminate than conventional weapons, given they randomly disperse small bombs over large areas.

For example, the MK-20, which is one of the weapons on Ukraine’s wish list, disperses 240 dart-like submunitions or bomblets after being deployed.

“The US had been producing and selling cluster bombs to its allies until a few years ago,” Antiwar.com recently pointed out. “In 2016, Textron Systems Corporation stopped producing MK-20s when the US stopped selling them to Saudi Arabia. But there’s still an estimated one million of the bombs Pentagon stockpiles.”

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 09:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/l5IMoOH Tyler Durden

Student Loan Repayments Will It Start The Recession?

Student Loan Repayments – Will It Start The Recession?

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Millions of young Americans will face the end of the student loan payment moratorium this summer. Why is this happening now, after a three-year break from payments? It is the result of the recent passage of the “Fiscal Responsibility Act” to raise the debt ceiling. Under that act, the Biden Administration is prohibited from extending the pause on student loan repayments which have remained in place since March 2020.

“Student loan payments are set to resume in the coming months. For more than 40 million Americans carrying student loan debt, the timeline to resume making payments is now on the horizon. The debt ceiling deal passed earlier this month paves the way for student loan payments to resume as early as August 29, 2023, per the latest update from the U.S. Department f Education: Federal Student Aid. For most, this will be the first time making payments since the early days of the pandemic in March 2020.” – Zerohedge

“So what? Some students with tuition debt now have to pay their loans.”

While, on the surface, the restarting of payments does not sound like a “big deal,” it is. As of the end of Q1-2023, almost $1.8 Trillion in student loan debt is outstanding. That debt carries a substantially higher interest rate than current bank loan rates.

About 92 percent of student loan debt is federal, with interest rates ranging from 4.99 percent to 7.54 percent. Average private student loan interest rates, on the other hand, can range from just under 4 percent to almost 15 percent.” – Bankrate

When you account for the size of the debt outstanding, the impact on personal spending in the future is significant.

“The analysis is based on federal student loan data for the aggregate $1.4 trillion balance across the 40.5mn borrowers by age cohort. Utilizing a 10-year payment period and a 5.8% interest rate, the bank calculates an approximate $390/month payment across cohorts.

Compared to a median pre-tax personal annual income of ~$57k, this payment represents an approximate 8% headwind to monthly income. In aggregate, this amounts to an “additional” (or rather, original, as the payments were there and then three years ago, they just stopped) $15.8bn in monthly payment for federal student loans affecting approximately 15.5% of the U.S. adult population (and 32% of the 25- to 34-year-old cohort).” – Barclays

That is a significant amount of money consumers have retained to spend on other things. Such is likely why retail spending has remained surprisingly buoyant in the face of higher interest rates and slowing economic growth. However, the question is whether the return of tuition payments will weaken that economic support.

Retail Sales And Economic Growth

In Q1 of 2023, the U.S. economy totaled $26.5 Trillion. Of that, as shown, Personal Consumption Expenditures, what we spend in the economy, total $18 Trillion.

In other words, nearly 70% of the economy is a function of consumer spending.

Logically, the concern is that when student loan payments restart, that will divert spending from the economy into debt service. (This is the same concern the U.S. faces with $32 Trillion in debt.)

In the U.S., retail sales comprise about 40% of personal consumption expenditures. When student loan payments restart, the most immediate impact will be felt in retail sales as consumers have less money to spend on discretionary items and services. Since 1992, retail sales, on a seasonally adjusted basis, have grown at an average rate of $1.4 billion monthly. The chart below shows the annual rate of change in seasonally adjusted retail sales versus the 12-month moving average of the annual rate of change.

If Barclay’s Bank is correct in its assumptions, removing the student loan moratorium on payments will significantly impact retail sales. The chart below projects the average retail sales growth less the student loan payments. If Barclay’s is correct in its assumptions, the impact on retail sales could be significant.

A Recession Risk

Given the importance of retail sales on overall economic growth, it is difficult to avoid a recession.

“According to a New York Fed study, the average student loan payment is $393 monthly. For consumers taking advantage of the program, they have deferred 39 months’ worth of payments, resulting in more than $15,327 in additional discretionary income during the period, much larger than the amount most consumers received from other COVID stimulus programs.

That sudden increase of $393 per month in loan repayments will force prime-age consumers (those aged 18-44 years) to cut back on discretionary spending. Since portions of that particular demographic tend to prioritize experiences over goods consumption, we will likely see a more significant impact on services which, as discussed previously, has been the one support keeping the economy out of recession.

“This isn’t the first time we have seen the manufacturing side of the economy contract, but services remained robust enough to keep the overall economy out of recession. The economy similarly avoided a “recession” in 1998, 2011, and 2015.”

If the data is correct, the economic and earnings risk is significant.

An Overlooked Risk

Since January, investors have been piling into cyclical stocks, assuming inflation would ease and the economy would avoid a recession. As noted, Wall Street analysts have become optimistic about accelerating earnings growth into next year.

“Analysts expect the first quarter of 2023 will mark the bottom for the earnings decline, and growth will accelerate into year-end. Again, this is despite the Fed rate hikes and tighter bank lending standards that will act to slow economic growth. The problem with these expectations is the detachment of earnings estimates above the long-term growth trend. The only two previous periods with similar deviations are the “Financial Crisis” and the “Dot.com” bubble.

However, the restarting of student loan repayments may be the one thing Wall Street overlooked in its rush to trumpet the “return of the bull.” The problem is that cyclical stocks heavily depend on consumer spending, particularly in technology, where companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon are direct-to-consumer companies. As those funds are redirected to student loan payments, a contraction in consumer spending will directly impact those companies’ sales, reducing bottom-line earnings.

Given that markets, and many of the high-flying names in 2023, are grossly overvalued, any negative impact on forward-earnings estimates could lead to a significant price correction. Most certainly, such a price reversion would accompany a recession in the economy caused by a contraction in spending.

While it is always unwise to bet against the U.S. consumer, the restarting of student loan payments is likely a hurdle the economy will struggle with. Furthermore, it is likely this is an impact the market has yet to factor into its assumptions for future economic and earnings growth rates.

We will find out later this year.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 08:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SZ6daPM Tyler Durden

Fed’s Favorite Inflation Signal Remains ‘Stuck’ As Wage-Growth Re-Accelerates In May

Fed’s Favorite Inflation Signal Remains ‘Stuck’ As Wage-Growth Re-Accelerates In May

One of The Fed’s favorite inflation indicators – Core PCE Deflator – rose 4.6% YoY (slightly cooler than the 4.7% exp but still ‘stuck’ at very high levels). Headline PCE fell back below 4.00% (3.8%) for the first time since April 2021…

Source: Bloomberg

Even more focused, is the Fed’s view on Services inflation ex-Shelter, and the PCE-equivalent shows that is very much stuck at high levels

Source: Bloomberg

Personal Income and Spending were both expected to rise on a MoM basis and did but while incomes rose more than expected, spending rose less (+0.4% vs +0.3% exp and +0.1% vs +0.2% exp respectively)…

Source: Bloomberg

YoY Spending growth slowed while YoY Income growth was flat in May

Source: Bloomberg

Adjusted for inflation, ‘real’ personal spending was unmchanged in May (up 2.1% YoY)…

Source: Bloomberg

More problematically, wage growth is re-accelerating…

  • Private worker wages rise 5.8% Y/Y, highest since Oct 2022

  • Govt worker wages rise 5.5%, highest since May 2022

Putting all that together, we see that the savings rate increased to 4.6% from 4.3%…

Source: Bloomberg

Is the consumer starting to pull back? Stalling spending combined with sticky core PCE – smells like teen-stagflation to us

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 08:42

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/RjnO7EB Tyler Durden

Core EU Inflation Unexpectedly Rebounds In June ECB Rate-Hike “Fait Accompli”

Core EU Inflation Unexpectedly Rebounds In June, ECB Rate-Hike “Fait Accompli”

In yet another setback for the smooth-landing crowd, core Euro-area inflation re-accelerated in June (while the headline declined), putting further pressure on The ECB to hike and keep hiking.

While the headline CPI fell notably from 6.1% to 5.5% (still high obviously), the core (ex-fuel and food) dominated any hopes by rebounding to 5.4% (from 5.0%)…

Source: Bloomberg

 Another rate increase in July is a “fait accompli,” according to ECB Vice President Luis de Guindos, who says the prospect of a move at the subsequent meeting in September is an open question.

“An extra interest rate hike at the next monetary policy meeting is nearly a done deal,” said Daniele Antonucci, chief economist and macro strategist at Quintet Private Bank.

“Further out, the picture is less clear. How far the ECB will have to go remains an open question and depends on how much it’s willing to sacrifice in terms of job losses.”

The inflation picture is mixed across the various EU member states.

National numbers this week from across the 20-member euro area showed Spanish inflation below the ECB’s 2% target, while France, Italy and the Netherlands all saw a retreat, albeit well above the goal. But German consumer-price growth quickened to 6.8%.

Expectations for a 25bps hike in July are now at 90%, and September is now at a 65% chance of another hike.

“While we do not currently see a wage-price spiral or a de-anchoring of expectations, the longer inflation remains above target, the greater such risks become,” the institution’s president, Christine Lagarde, said Tuesday.

“We need to bring inflation back to our 2% medium-term target in a timely manner.”

Another hike beyond July would bring the ECB’s deposit rate to 4%… and ECB members have hinted it will stay high for longer (following The Fed’s narrative).

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 08:21

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/bfl7HKY Tyler Durden

Futures Rise As Apple Market Cap Tops $3 Trillion

Futures Rise As Apple Market Cap Tops $3 Trillion

The second quarter – and first half – of 2023 is coming to a close on an upbeat note, as US equity futures are higher, led by megacap tech, and especially Apple, which is set to open with a market cap over $3 trillion following a bizarre initiation report from Citi yesterday late, which set a $240 price target on the world’s biggest company, just in time to catch its all time high. As of 7:45am ET, S&P futures were 0.4% higher, set to close out a third straight quarterly gain…

… while Nasdaq futures rose 0.5%, indicating the index is set to extend its 37% surge since the start of the year, its best start to the year since 1982.

Treasuries extended a selloff, with yields rising 4-6 bps across the curve as two-year yields rose about five basis points to 4.92%, adding to Thursday’s 16-point jump. The 10-year yield increased three points to its highest level since mid-March. Swap markets now indicate a nearly 50% chance of a second US hike by year-end sparked by robust US economic growth and jobs data that fueled bets on more interest rate hikes. The USD is higher, and commodities are mixed with the energy complex higher and base metals lower. Today, focus will be on the latest PCE report where consensus expects core PCE to print 4.7% vs. 4.7% prior and headline PCE to drop to 3.8% vs. 4.4% prior. In addition, keep an eye on Personal Income/ Spending, MNI Chicago PMI and the revision of UMich. data. Also, the supreme Court will decide on Biden’s student loan forgiveness today.

In premarket trading, it was a less positive picture for sportswear giant Nike, whose shares fell 3.7% after the retailer’s outlook for the full year failed to impress. While sales beat forecasts, however, and analysts highlighted Nike’s better-than-anticipated performance in China as a bright spot. The results also showed Nike is still working to sell off its high stockpiles of merchandise that have eroded profitability. “Nike is a solid brand,” said Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail. But “it isn’t on the front foot either, and has to accept that the year ahead will be one of resetting, retrenching, and reformulating the way it does business.” Here are some other notable premarket movers:

  • Apple shares rise 0.8% in premarket trading Friday, with the iPhone maker’s market value set to exceed the historic $3 trillion threshold.
  • Aurinia Pharmaceuticals shares jump as much as 19% in US premarket trading after the drug developer said that it is exploring options, including a sale. Analysts say the announcement is positive for the shares and could see the company being an attractive target for a bigger pharma firm in the rheumatology space, touting a possible takeout price in the high teens.
  • XPeng shares jump over 7% in US premarket trading after the Chinese company unveiled its new G6 electric SUV. Analysts say the product has a competitive price and could stock sales.
  • Smart Global shares rose 5.2% in post-market trading after the company forecast adjusted earnings per share for the fourth quarter that exceeded the average analyst estimate at the midpoint.

Thursday’s readings on US jobless claims and the gross domestic product showed the world’s biggest economy was in better shape than many had envisioned at the start of 2023. After the data came out, the US yield-curve inversion intensified — with longer-dated yields rising less than shorter-maturity ones. That means the economy may look stronger now, but investors expect the Fed’s rate increases to curb future growth, which could boost the risk of a recession down the road.

Bets on further Fed tightening will be will be tested by US price measures due Friday, including figures on personal income and spending as well as the PCE deflator, the Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge of underlying inflation pressures. The numbers are expected to show some softening while still indicating inflation remains sticky.

“Markets are still really caught up in the ‘strong data’ narrative,” said James Rossiter, head of global macro strategy at TD Securities. “But ultimately the Fed’s going to be focused on where inflation is right now. It’s going to be a more difficult decision for them in July, especially given how much tightening they’ve already put in the system that still has to play out.”

The Stoxx Europe 600 index climbed more than 1% led by energy, real estate and banks, with all sectors rising barring tech. Euro Stoxx 50 rises 0.6%. FTSE MIB outperforms peers, adding 0.9%, FTSE 100 lags, adding 0.6%. Among individual movers, Engie SA rose after the French utility raised its full-year earnings forecast. ASML Holding NV dropped after the Dutch chipmaker was slapped with more restrictions on exports to China. The European benchmark is on track to end the quarter flat after failing to build on its 7.8% first-quarter gain amid outflows from European stocks totaling $27 billion this year. A gauge of global equities, meanwhile, headed for a quarterly rise of 4.5%, defying rising interest rates and the risk of recessions in major economies. Here are today’s most notable movers:

  • Kion shares rise as much as 7.6%, the most since November, with Warburg expecting the German warehouse equipment firm to present solid second-quarter figures on 27 July
  • LEG Immobilien jumped 7.5% after the German real estate company boosted its guidance for adjusted funds from operations and EBITDA margin for the full year, boosting the whole real estate sector
  • Steico rises as much as 11% after Morgan Stanley raised its recommendation to overweight, saying the manufacturer of insulation materials is close to the bottom of the downgrade cycle
  • Societe Generale rises as much as 2.3% to a one-month high after Deutsche Bank raised its recommendation to buy from hold, noting tailwinds for 2024 such as a recovery in NII
  • Engie rises as much as 2.7% after the French utility raised its FY earnings forecast. Morgan Stanley attributes the guide upgrade stems to the company’s global energy management and sales
  • Drax shares climb as much as 3.9% after Credit Suisse raised its recommendation on the British utility to outperform saying the valuation looks attractive on most cashflow-based metrics
  • Nordex rises as much as 4.5% after Deutsche Bank initiated coverage of the German wind turbine maker with buy, saying it’s well-positioned in most key regions with impressive recent share gain
  • ASML falls as much as 3.8%, its biggest intraday decline since April, after a Reuters report said the US plans to force the company to ship fewer of its deep ultraviolet lithography machines to China
  • Bawag shares fell the most in more than three months, tumbling as much as 14% in Vienna, after activist investor Petrus Advisers Ltd. published a report that identified potential red flags
  • Aperam slides as much as 7.1% after the steelmaker was downgraded by two brokerage firms. Degroof Petercam cuts the stock to hold, citing a lack of short-term visibility on earnings recovery
  • Fevertree shares drop as much as 7.4%, the most intraday since April 27, after Bank of America cut its recommendation on the high-end tonic maker to underperform, citing an “unjustified” valuation

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks traded with cautious gains amid the higher yield environment and as participants digested a slew of data releases at quarter-end including the latest Chinese official PMIs.

  • Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were initially choppy but ultimately gained after the latest Chinese PMI data in which headline Manufacturing PMI matched estimates and Non-Manufacturing PMI was slightly softer-than-expected although remained at a firm expansion.
  • ASX 200 lacked direction as gains in the commodity-related sectors and utilities offset losses in real estate and tech.
  • Nikkei 225 was subdued after mixed data releases including disappointing Industrial Production and softer-than-expected Tokyo CPI although the losses were cushioned as USD/JPY briefly climbed above 145.00.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index remains little changed; NOK/USD leads G-10 gains climbing 0.5%, while EURUSD slumps 0.2% after data showed euro-area core inflation re-accelerating. The yen briefly weakened past 145 for the first time since November, putting markets on watch for possible Japanese intervention. It since retraced to around 144.70 after Finance Minister Shunichi Suzuki told reporters the government would respond appropriately to any excessive moves in the currency market. The offshore yuan remained in the spotlight after the recent slide to its lowest level in seven months. It appreciated Friday, for the first time in three days, after the People’s Bank of China again set the daily reference rate for currency at a level stronger than the average estimate in a Bloomberg survey. The currency is down almost 5% against the dollar this year, prompting extra scrutiny from Chinese regulators, according to people familiar with the matter. Purchasing managers’ index data from China on Friday underscored concern that the economy is losing steam, bolstering calls for more policy support.

In rates, treasuries extended a weekly slide gilts fall sharply following a bundle of UK economic data. Treasury losses continued to be led by front-end and belly of the curve, deepening inversion of 2s10s, 5s30s spreads. Yields on the two- year climbing six basis points to 4.92% and yields on the 10- year rising 4 basis points to 3.88%; euro bonds see broad-based selling. 2s10s, 5s30s spreads flatter by 1.3bp and 2bp on the day; 10-year yields around 3.87%, cheaper by 3bp vs Thursday close. Yields except 30-year are at highest levels since March as expectations have mounted for two more Fed rate increases this year, and the Bloomberg Treasury Index is headed for a second straight monthly loss. Month-end index rebalancing at 4pm is estimated to extend its duration by 0.07 year. US session includes May personal income and spending report that embeds PCE deflators.

Yields on European bonds retreated from session highs and the euro pared a decline after data showed inflation in the common-currency area slowed more than economists’ expectations in June. Core prices re-accelerated, though, in a setback for the European Central Bank that may reinforce its determination to raise interest rates next month.

“An extra interest rate hike at the next monetary policy meeting is nearly a done deal,” said Daniele Antonucci, chief economist and macro strategist at Quintet Private Bank. “Further out, the picture is less clear. How far the ECB will have to go remains an open question and depends on how much it’s willing to sacrifice in terms of job losses.”

In commodities, WTI drifts 1% higher to trade near $70.54. Brent crude oil is on track for the worst run of quarterly losses in three decades as persistent concerns over the demand outlook and robust supplies weigh on prices. Spot gold falls roughly $5 to trade near $1,903/oz.

Bitcoin is on a firmer footing intraday but remains under the USD 31k level. RBNZ is to ramp up monitoring of stablecoins and crypto assets but noted that regulation of crypto assets is not currently required.

Looking at today’s data, releases include the Euro Area flash CPI reading for June. In Germany, we’ll also get retail sales for May and unemployment for June. And in the US, there’s the PCE reading for May, and personal income and personal spending data.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.1% to 4,442.00
  • MXAP down 0.2% to 162.88
  • MXAPJ little changed at 512.81
  • Nikkei down 0.1% to 33,189.04
  • Topix down 0.3% to 2,288.60
  • Hang Seng Index little changed at 18,916.43
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.6% to 3,202.06
  • Sensex up 1.0% to 64,562.15
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.1% to 7,203.30
  • Kospi up 0.6% to 2,564.28
  • STOXX Europe 600 up 0.7% to 459.63
  • German 10Y yield little changed at 2.45%
  • Euro down 0.2% to $1.0839
  • Brent Futures up 0.9% to $75.02/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.4% to $1,900.84
  • U.S. Dollar Index up 0.18% to 103.53

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • China’s June NBS PMIs better than feared, with manufacturing ticking up to 49 (vs. 48.8 in May and inline w/the Street) while services cool to 53.2 (down from 54.5 in May and a tiny bit below the Street’s 53.5 forecast). RTRS
  • U.S. counterintelligence officials are amping up warnings to American executives about fresh dangers to doing business in China under an amended Chinese law to combat espionage. WSJ
  • Japan’s Tokyo CPI for June undershoots the Street, coming in at +3.1% headline (vs. the Street’s +3.4% and down from +3.2% in May) and +3.8% core (vs. the Street’s +4% and down from +3.9% in May. BBG
  • ECB’s hawkishness in part a function of events in the UK where inflation continues to surprise to the upside (ECB officials don’t want to take their foot off the tightening gas until they are absolutely certain core inflation is on a sustainable downward trajectory). FT 
  • Eurozone CPI for June undershoots the Street, with headline coming in at +5.5% (vs. the Street +5.6% and down from +6.1% in May) and core +5.4% (vs. the Street +5.5% and up from +5.3% in May). BBG
  • “Shaky” flows into Pimco are prompting Allianz to push deeper into alternative asset classes such as real estate, where manager’s fees tend to be higher and client assets are stickier. While the bond manager attracted €14 billion in the first quarter after a €75 billion streak of outflows, investors are still skittish, Allianz CEO Oliver Baete said. BBG
  • PCE: Based on details in the PPI, CPI, and import price reports, we forecast that the core PCE price index rose by 0.32% month-over-month in May, corresponding to a 4.64% increase from a year earlier. Additionally, we expect that the headline PCE price index increased by 0.13% in May, corresponding to a 3.87% increase from a year earlier. We expect that personal income increased by 0.5% and personal spending increased by 0.2% in May. GIR
  • NKE delivered a solid F4Q23 revenue result, with stronger DTC growth and momentum in Greater China driving the outperformance. However, we note that this was offset by weaker than expected F4Q margins and a below-consensus F1Q guide. We step away from the quarter with our constructive view intact. While near-term growth and margins are more challenged than our expectations on wholesale shipment timing / liquidation sales / transitory cost headwinds / SG&A investments, we believe this quarter continued to deliver several key proofpoints of the bull case. GIR
  • META is planning to allow people in the EU download apps through Facebook ads, a move that will eventually put it in direct competition w/the app stores from Google and Apple. The Verge
  • Nasdaq 100 GREEN in July 15 consecutive years with an avg return of +4.64%…

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks mostly traded with cautious gains amid the higher yield environment and as participants digested a slew of data releases at quarter-end including the latest Chinese official PMIs. ASX 200 lacked direction as gains in the commodity-related sectors and utilities offset losses in real estate and tech. Nikkei 225 was subdued after mixed data releases including disappointing Industrial Production and softer-than-expected Tokyo CPI although the losses were cushioned as USD/JPY briefly climbed above 145.00. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were initially choppy but ultimately gained after the latest Chinese PMI data in which headline Manufacturing PMI matched estimates and Non-Manufacturing PMI was slightly softer-than-expected although remained at a firm expansion.

Top Asian News

  • China may announce more property market support measures although measures might be incremental, while China is expected to revise certain home purchase restrictions and has room to lower the down payment ratio, according to China Securities Journal.
  • PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.2258 vs exp. 7.2525 (prev. 7.2208).
  • PBoC surveyed some foreign banks about USD deposit rates, according to Reuters sources.
  • Japan Chief Cabinet Secretary Matsuno said sharp, one-sided currency moves are seen recently, and they are closely watching FX moves with a high sense of urgency. Matsuno said they are to take appropriate steps on excess FX moves, according to Reuters.
  • Japan MOF says FX intervention amounted to JPY 0.00 in the period from May 30th to June 28th, according to Reuters.

European bourses trade on the front-foot with the Stoxx 600 on track to close the week out with gains, with little action seen on the EZ Flash CPI metrics. US equity futures are around flat/tilting higher ahead of today’s key PCE data for May, before traders head out for the long Independence Day holiday weekend. Equity sectors in Europe are higher across the board with the exception of technology which is being weighed on by ASML which is also acting as a drag on the AEX following news that the Dutch Foreign Ministry has issued new computer chip equipment export rules whereby an export license will be required for certain technologies.

Top European News

  • ASML Hit With New Dutch Limits on Chip Gear Exports to China
  • Fevertree Drops After Bank of America Cuts to Underperform
  • Polish Inflation Eases for Fourth Month, Fueling Rate Cut Bets
  • ASML Says Dutch Measures Won’t Have ‘Material Impact’ on Outlook
  • Germany June Adj. Unemployment Rate Rises to 5.7%; Est. 5.6%
  • Swiss Chalets Become Target Amid Eastern Europe’s Property Woes

FX

  • DXY remains relatively resilient and firmly underpinned, with the index forming a solid base above 103.000 between 103.23-54 parameters.
  • EUR was unreactive to a batch of mixed EZ data, whilst headline inflation printed cooler than expected, although the core metrics marginally topped expectations.
  • Cyclical currencies are held up fairly well on the back of buoyant risk appetite.
  • Kiwi got another confidence boost from an improvement in ANZ consumer sentiment.
  • Yen is flat despite more verbal intervention from Japanese officials.
  • Brazil’s Finance Minister said the National Monetary Council decided to set the 2026 inflation target at 3%, while the government expects rates to fall from August, according to Reuters.

Fixed Income

  • Debt futures appear destined for a bleak finish and further losses heading into month, quarter, HY-end.
  • Bunds, Gilts and the T-note hover precariously over deeper intraday lows, at 133.09, 94.71 and 111-25+ respectively.

Geopolitics

  • The US is expected to curb exports of some Dutch chip equipment to specific facilities in China, according to a source cited by Reuters. ASML (ASML NA) does not expect the Dutch government’s chip export measures to have a material impact on its financial outlook, according to the press release.
  • Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said he sees no argument for a Black Sea Grain Deal extension, according to a press conference.
  • US State Department approved the potential sale of logistics supply support to Taiwan for an estimated cost of USD 108mln, while it approved the possible sale of 30mm ammunition and related equipment to Taiwan for an estimated USD 332mln, according to Reuters.
  • Australian and EU trade ministers spoke as hopes of a free trade deal rise, according to Reuters citing sources; there is optimism a deal could be struck by mid-year. Another meeting could be held next fortnight.

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent front-month futures are on a firmer footing intraday despite the firmer Dollar but as equities see cautious gains.
  • Spot gold remains heavy as the Dollar extends gains, with the yellow metal threatening another breach of USD 1,900/oz to the downside this morning
  • Base metals are mostly but copper bucks the trend and outperforms, with the LME 3M contract back above USD 8,250/t at the time of writing. Reports last night noted an electrical accident at Codelco’s largest copper mine – the El Teniente mine.
  • HSBC lowered Brent oil price assumptions to USD 80/bl in H2’23, USD 80/bl in FY23, USD 75/b in FY24 and long-term, according to Reuters.
  • Boliden’s (BOL SS) Ronnskar production partially resumed; several of production lines may have to operate at limited capacity; all other production lines at Ronnskar are expected to ready for production during July.
  • Shanghai INE adjusts trading limit and margin requirements for international copper and crude oil futures, effective from settlement on July 4, according to Reuters.

US Event Calendar

  • 08:30: May Personal Income, est. 0.3%, prior 0.4%
    • May Personal Spending, est. 0.2%, prior 0.8%
    • May Real Personal Spending, est. 0.1%, prior 0.5%
    • May PCE Deflator MoM, est. 0.1%, prior 0.4%
    • May PCE Deflator YoY, est. 3.8%, prior 4.4%
    • May PCE Core Deflator YoY, est. 4.7%, prior 4.7%
    • May PCE Core Deflator MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.4%
  • 09:45: June MNI Chicago PMI, est. 43.8, prior 40.4
  • 10:00: June U. of Mich. Sentiment, est. 63.9, prior 63.9
    • June U. of Mich. Expectations, est. 61.3, prior 61.3
    • June U. of Mich. Current Conditions, est. 68.0, prior 68.0
    • June U. of Mich. 1 Yr Inflation, est. 3.3%, prior 3.3%
    • June U. of Mich. 5-10 Yr Inflation, est. 3.0%, prior 3.0%

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Welcome to the last day of H1. We’ll have our full review on Monday but with a day left to go here is a quick and selected spot check of where we are in 2023 so far. The S&P 500 is +14.5%, the Nasdaq +29.9%, FANG+ +70.9%, EU Stoxx 600 +7.5%, 2 and 10yr USTs +43.4bps and -3.7bps, 2 and 10yr Gilts +170bps and +71bps, EU Crossover -68.7bps, CDX HY +1.4bps and with Crude Oil -13.47%. So in general a good half year for risk, with yield curves steepening and long-term bond yields going mostly sideways unless of course you’re in the UK. H1 has mostly been a risk rebound from stressed levels in 2022 so the performance should be put in some perspective but with AI giving things an added kicker. Let’s see what H2 brings. Much will depend on whether the US recession starts. We still think it does in Q4 with risks that it gets delayed to Q1 rather than doesn’t happen. There’s a long long way before you can be sure you’re out of the gravitational pull of the lag of aggressively tighter monetary policy over the last year or so. Remember that this time last year the ECB was only about to end QE on July 1st and hike rates at the end of that month.

The recession call was something we asked in our summer survey this week. We’ve now released the results in a slidepack (link here). It’s evident that a lot of people are pushing back their timing of the next US recession, but mostly that’s just a shift from 2023 into 2024, rather than thinking we’ll avoid one altogether. We’ve also seen more bearishness since our last survey, with a majority now expecting the next 10% move in the S&P to be down rather than up (the opposite to the last survey), whilst it’s pretty much 50/50 as to whether 10yr Treasury yields hit 4.5% or 2.5% first. For other opinions on central banks, ChatGPT and the chance of Donald Trump being President again, click on the full chartbook for more.

The big story of the last 24 hours was another strong round of US data, which triggered a massive bond selloff that sent Treasury yields to their highest levels since SVB collapsed. In particular, the latest weekly US jobless claims dropped back to 239k (vs. 265k expected), marking their biggest single-week decline since October 2021, and importantly ending a run of 5 consecutive weekly gains. Alongside that, the continuing claims fell to their lowest level since February, and the latest Q1 GDP data saw a big upward revision to a +2.0% annualised pace, having previously been estimated at +1.3%.

All this positive data played into the recent market narrative, which is that strong growth and sticky inflation will see central banks hold rates at restrictive levels for much longer than previously expected. In fact, if you look at market pricing for deep into 2024, it was clear how investors were adjusting to a much more prolonged period of high rates. For instance, expectations for the Fed’s policy rate by December 2024 moved back above 4% again to their highest level since SVB’s collapse (the low was 2.70% after peaking at 4.22% before SVB). Now admittedly, that’s still beneath the 4.6% level in the Fed’s latest dot plot, but it shows how markets are increasingly coming round to the Fed’s view of the world.

This shift was evident for the very near-term as well, with futures now pricing in a 83% chance of a July hike, the highest to date. They even see a 38% chance that by November the Fed will now deliver the second additional hike they signalled for 2023. So that’s still some way from 100%, but it goes to show how the previous scepticism towards two more Fed hikes is increasingly fading. US Core PCE will be a big event on this front today.

This re-appraisal of the outlook was very bad news for Treasuries across the board. It saw the 10yr yield surge by +13.1bps on the day to 3.84%, marking its highest level since SVB’s collapse in March. At the same time, the 2yr yield (+15.4bps) hit a post-SVB high of its own at 4.86%, and thus inverting the 2s10s curve further to -102.1bps. Meanwhile the 6m T-bill (+1.0bps) rose to its highest level since 2001, at 5.46%. It was real yields that led the gains as well, with the 2yr real yield (+12.6bps) hitting a post-2008 high of 2.79%, and another milestone was reached after the 5yr real yield crossed the 2% mark on an intraday basis for the first time since 2008 (ending the day at 1.99%).

With all eyes on central banks and the rates path, markets will now focus on today’s Euro Area flash CPI print for June, with particular attention on the core reading. Ahead of that, we got some more of the country releases yesterday, including from Germany, the largest European economy. That showed a rebound in inflation to +6.8% on the EU-harmonised measure as expected, up from +6.3% in May. In part, the rebound occurred because last year saw an offer of cheap rail tickets that dropped outside the annual comparison. But there was also an upside in Spain as well, since even as headline inflation dropped beneath the ECB’s 2% target, core inflation (on the national definition) still came in at +5.9% (vs. +5.5% expected). With the country releases so far, our Euro Area economists see slight upside risks to the +5.6% yoy headline (+5.5% core) consensus expectation for today.

We’ll have to see what today’s numbers show, but the movements in European rates very much followed what happened in the US yesterday. That included rises in yields on 10yr bunds (+10.3bps), OATs (+10.9bps) and BTPs (+12.1bps), along with a more moderate rise for gilts (+6.3bps). Similarly, investors also grew in confidence that the ECB would keep taking rates higher, and now see a 58% chance that we’ll have had two hikes by the time of the meeting-after-next in September.

Despite the rates move, equities were remarkably resilient, with the S&P 500 posting a +0.45% gain. Banks (+2.62%) led the advance amidst the prospect of higher rates, and positive US stress test results the night before, but other cyclical sectors also put in a decent performance. Indeed, the small-cap Russell 2000 advanced for a 4th consecutive day, finishing +1.23% by the close. By contrast, the NASDAQ index was unchanged (-0.00%), with the tech megacap FANG+ index underperforming (-0.75%). Back in Europe there were also modest advances, with the STOXX 600 posting a modest +0.13% gain.

Asian equity markets are mixed on the final trading day of the first half of the year. As I type, the Nikkei (-0.53%) is struggling with the Hang Seng (-0.05%) swinging between gains and losses. Otherwise, the Shanghai Composite (+0.73%), the CSI (+0.54%) and the KOSPI (+0.28%) are gaining ground this morning. In overnight trading, US stock futures are slightly higher with those on the S&P 500 (+0.07%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.18%) printing mild gains.

Early morning data showed that China’s factory activity remained in contraction territory in June as the official manufacturing PMI came in at 49.0, barely improving from prior month’s reading of 48.8, thus adding pressure on the administration to deliver more stimulus. Additionally, the services sector also recorded its weakest reading since China abandoned its stringent COVID curbs late last year. The official non-manufacturing PMI eased to 53.2 from 54.5 in May, highlighting that the recovery in the world’s second biggest economy has lost some traction.

Elsewhere, consumer prices in Tokyo rose +3.1% y/y in June (+3.4% expected, down from the +3.2% recorded in the preceding month). Ex-food and energy came in at 3.8% vs. 4% expected. Separately, Japan’s labour market remained tight as the jobless rate remained unchanged at 2.6% in May while industrial output contracted -1.6% m/m in May, its first fall since January (v/s -1.0% decline expected) after increasing +0.7% previously.

In FX, the Japanese yen went past the 145 mark versus the US dollar in early Asia trade, touching its lowest in over seven months, prompting more intervention calls. They intervened at around 146 last year. Meanwhile, slightly hawkish comments on desired FX stability from Japan’s Finance Minister Shunichi Suzuki did trigger the pair’s retreat from 145.07 earlier to 144.71 as we go to print.

When it came to yesterday’s other data, UK mortgage approvals saw a larger-than-expected increase in May to 50.5k (vs. 49.7k expected). Furthermore, the M4 money supply came in unchanged on a year-on-year basis, which is the lowest it’s been since September 2015. Elsewhere, the European Commission’s economic sentiment indicator for the Euro Area continued to decline, with a move to a 7-month low of 95.3 in June (vs. 95.7 expected), adding to the negative trend in Euro Area data surprises over the past two months.

To the day ahead now, and data releases include the Euro Area flash CPI reading for June. In Germany, we’ll also get retail sales for May and unemployment for June. And in the US, there’s the PCE reading for May, and personal income and personal spending data.

Tyler Durden
Fri, 06/30/2023 – 08:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ut0NITh Tyler Durden

Ron DeSantis Says He’s a Christian. He Should Read the Parable of the Good Samaritan.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appears to be getting a bit big for his britches. He’s not only imagining himself as the nation’s next president as he competes for the Republican nomination, but he recently envisioned himself as one of Jesus’ disciples during one of history’s greatest dramas.

“These guys all went out and they dedicated their lives to spreading the gospel,” DeSantis said in a televised interview on the Christian Broadcasting Network. “I look back at that and would love to have been able to be there with them.” Some died horrific deaths as martyrs. None of them sought or gained governmental power, so it’s an interesting take from an ambitious politician.

That’s not the only area where DeSantis might need a Sunday school refresher. Recently, someone orchestrated unannounced charter air flights of immigrants from a refugee camp to Sacramento. As CNN reported, the Latin American asylum seekers, who had documents purportedly from Florida’s government, were driven from Texas to New Mexico, then flown to California and dumped on the doorstep of the Catholic diocese.

“We are here because they offered us a job,” a Venezuelan man told CNN. “We were deceived by the people who provided the flight service. They offered us jobs and housing.” Defenders say the operation was voluntary because the refugees signed papers—even though few understood the English verbiage. DeSantis had been mum, but his administration later reportedly defended the flights by saying the migrants were well-treated.

Last year, DeSantis boasted that he sent 50 migrants from a Texas facility (yes, Florida officials went to Texas to do this) to the Massachusetts vacation town of Martha’s Vineyard. “There may be more flights, there may be buses,” DeSantis told cheering supporters. As Reuters reported, Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott sent 17,000 migrants to Washington, D.C., New York, and Chicago.

The obvious goal is to force Democratic states to deal with the consequences of a Democratic administration’s lax immigration policy. The Biden administration denies that it is ignoring the border problem and claims illegal border crossings are down 70 percent, but in January Pew Research Center found that encounters between border agents and immigrants were at record levels. DeSantis is making border security a top political issue.

Ironically, many recent migrants are from Venezuela, which suggests the situation isn’t entirely the result of a porous border, as The New Yorker noted, but the failure of a far-off communist hellhole that has displaced 20 percent of its population. The article reminded us that non-border-state Florida typically has welcomed refugees from totalitarian Cuba.

Real border states are struggling to deal with an influx of illegal border-crossers and those seeking asylum. Voters should certainly debate the nation’s immigration policies, which are fair game for earnest disagreement. Can’t both sides agree, however, that it’s wrong to use human beings as pawns in an apparent political stunt?

Do these airlifts sound like something Jesus and his disciples would have supported or something from uncaring Roman authorities? As the Gospel of Luke explains, Caesar Augustus mandated a census, thus requiring people who lived in the Roman Empire to trudge to their home towns to be registered for tax purposes. Jesus ended up in a manger after Mary and Joseph failed to find a place to stay.

During his ministry, Jesus had much to say about how we should treat strangers. In the story of the Good Samaritan, for instance, a lawyer questions Jesus about how he can receive eternal life. Jesus answers by telling him to love the Lord with all his heart and to “love your neighbor as yourself.”

The lawyer responds in a lawyerly way: “Who is my neighbor?” And then Jesus tells the parable, by which the Samaritan helps a traveler who was left for dead by robbers—after a priest and Levite passed by the injured man. The real neighbor was the lowly man who helped the traveler, not the religious officials who went along their merry way.

After the migrants were dropped off in Sacramento, religious groups have tended to their needs, which showed that some people know the right way to behave. Attorney General Rob Bonta promised an investigation into whether the trip involved “state-sanctioned kidnapping.” Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted DeSantis in a vicious tweet. I’m no fan of these politicians, either, but they are right to be outraged.

Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg struck the right tone: “Sacramento is going to do everything it can to care for these vulnerable people who are dropped off at our doorsteps. No matter what the terrible motivation was from whoever did this, that’s our job.” In fact, liberal communities have schooled these conservative politicians by providing assistance to the stranded migrants.

They indeed have been Good Samaritans. DeSantis might envision himself as one of Jesus’ disciples, but before he gets too carried away he might want to brush up on that parable.

This column was first published in The Orange County Register.

The post Ron DeSantis Says He’s a Christian. He Should Read the Parable of the Good Samaritan. appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/zj13apD
via IFTTT

The Green Police Are Coming for New York Pizza

When I lived in New York City my favorite pizzeria was Arturo’s, on Houston Street. Coal–fired ovens made for a charred crust you could use to sop up sauce from an order of mussels. But joints like that are at risk as the city’s environmental regulators propose mandatory 75 percent reductions in emissions by restaurants that use traditional fuels in their cooking and baking—a goal many restaurant owners consider unachievable. The rule isn’t finalized, and it contains caveats that savvy business owners could use as a lifeline. But it’s the latest sign that environmental activists expect us to modify our lifestyles to meet their green priorities.

“The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP or the Department) is promulgating rules that would establish requirements for control devices to reduce emissions from cook stoves at restaurants in existence prior to May 6, 2016,” reads the city regulatory agency’s announcement of a July 27 public hearing. “The proposed rule provides that the operators of cook stoves that were installed prior to May 6, 2016 must hire a professional engineer or registered architect to assess the feasibility of installing emission controls on the cook stove to achieve a 75% reduction in particulate emissions. If this assessment concludes that a reduction of 75% or more cannot be achieved, or that no emissions controls can be installed, the assessment must identify any emission controls that could provide a reduction of at least 25% or an explanation for why no emission controls can be installed.”

The rule also specifies that “Cook stove means any wood fired or anthracite coal fired appliance used [primarily for cooking food for onsite consumption at a food service establishment…] for the preparation of food intended for onsite consumption or retail purchase.”

War on Pizza

To most people, this sounds annoying and intrusive if very particular to old-school cookery. To New Yorkers in particular, though, it’s a declaration of war against pizza.

“If you fuck around with the temperature in the oven you change the taste. That pipe, that chimney, it’s that size to create the perfect updraft, keeps the temp perfect, it’s an art as much as a science. You take away the char, the thing that makes the pizza taste great, you kill it,” an anonymous restaurant owner who relies on a coal–fired oven told the New York Post.

The allowance in the proposed rule for feasibility assessments means that existing restaurants might escape enforcement. That’s a potential lifesaver, since $20,000 plus ongoing maintenance costs is the price tag for compliance cited by at least two restaurateurs. Businesses will have to shoulder all expenses for meeting the requirements of the proposed rule.

“You know how many pizzas I have to sell to pay for that $20,000 oven?” pizzeria owner Joe Calcagno complained to CBS News.

Ovens installed since 2016 are already subject to restrictive rules, meaning that you’re unlikely to see traditional fuels used in new installations. That means existing restaurants with wood– and coal–fired ovens will be it, dwindling in number as the years pass with inevitable attrition.

If this sounds familiar, that’s because demands that we all change the way we live our lives, our preferences be damned, have become increasingly common.

Your Gas Stove is Next

“In May, the Democrat-controlled New York State Legislature and Gov. Kathy Hochul inked a $229 billion state budget agreement that included a ban on residential gas stoves. By 2029, only electric ranges will be allowed in new residences,” Reason‘s Christian Britschgi reports in the August/September issue. “The policy is similar to bans imposed by local governments in places such as New York City and California. Advocates say those laws help curtail climate change by reducing natural gas consumption and protect people’s health by reducing in-home emissions.”

This comes after huffy initial denials that anybody wanted to ban popular gas stoves, which are preferred by many chefs as well as home cooks for their quick and reliable heat. Sixty-nine percent of respondents to a recent Harvard CAPS Harris poll opposed “governmental rules that would virtually eliminate gas stoves from kitchens.” Then there’s the bypassed discussion about the wisdom of eliminating alternatives to electric appliances and expanding reliance on a power grid that’s already overburdened and rickety.

“The U.S. power system is faltering just as millions of Americans are becoming more dependent on it—not just to light their homes, but increasingly to work remotely, charge their phones and cars, and cook their food—as more modern conveniences become electrified,” The Wall Street Journal warned last year.

But politicians pretty quickly went from denying that gas bans were in the works to embracing them and insisting that they’re a great idea.

“There are clean energy alternatives,” New York Governor Kathy Hochul said in May after her state banned natural gas in new buildings starting in 2026. “It’s going to take time and I want to make sure that New Yorkers don’t get hit hard for the costs, so we’re going to roll this out. But new buildings that are going up, they can go electric, they can do heat pumps.”

Take a Vacation While You Can

By the same token, travelers enjoying flights to tourist destinations after the disruptions of the pandemic might want to enjoy their trips while they can. “Sustainability” is the hot topic at this year’s Paris Air Show, which means non-stop discussions about reducing the environmental impact of travel. That means conversations about increased efficiency and new fuels, but that’s not enough for everybody.

“In the end, the decarbonisation of air travel will only happen through a reduction in air travel overall,” Jérôme Du Boucher, aviation specialist for the NGO Transport & Environment, told France24.

That’s not just the musings of a lone activist; it’s a serious proposal in certain circles and a recommendation by France’s Agency for Ecological Transition. That government body proposes hiking ticket prices with taxes or capping flights to reduce air travel. Never mind that “flying has gotten considerably cheaper, safer, faster and even greener, over the last 60 years,” according to a 2017 article by the University of Texas at Austin. “Today’s aircraft use roughly 80 percent less fuel per passenger-mile than the first jets of the 1950s.” Further innovation seems more promising than reserving air travel for the wealthy and well-connected, but that’s not the world in which we live.

No, the world in which we live is one in which governments polish their green credentials by banning decent stoves even as they close nuclear power plants that could really reduce emissions. It’s one in which choice and personal preferences matter less than top-down dictates. It’s one in which you should enjoy pizza made in a coal– or wood–fired oven now, because it may soon be a thing of the past.

The post The Green Police Are Coming for New York Pizza appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/lFDNPjp
via IFTTT

Adam Smith Said Colonists Should Join the British Union. Was He Serious?

By the time Adam Smith’s An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations appeared on March 9, 1776, the American colonies were in a state of revolt and the British authorities were furiously debating what was to be done. Smith’s Wealth of Nations presented two options.

The first option was to let the colonies go. The second was to unify the American colonies with Britain the way Scotland had been united with England. Smith himself was Scottish and, looking back, was very glad of the 1707 Acts of Union, whereby Scotland quit its parliament in Edinburgh and henceforth sent parliamentarians to Westminster. In Wealth of Nations, Smith suggested the same course for the American colonies. He proposed that Americans send parliamentarians to sit as equals in Westminster. Just as Scotland belonged to Great Britain, so now would those erstwhile American colonies which opted in. Smith’s proposal did not specify a new name for the enlarged constitutional state, but Smith foresaw with remarkable accuracy that a new name would, in time, be in order.

But did Smith propose such a union in earnest?

There was an outpouring of ironic writing in mid–18th century Britain, as Wayne C. Booth notes in his 1974 study, A Rhetoric of Irony. Likewise, as Arthur M. Melzer explains in 2014’s Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing, writing between the lines was pervasive up to the end of the 18th century.

Smith was no stranger to irony. His first publications in 1755 in the Edinburgh Review contained sly digs and satire. Such devices abounded in his 1759 book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Wealth of Nations is more straightforward, but it still has its sly moments and undercurrents.

A close examination of Smith’s two proposals for how the British might deal with the American colonies suggests, to me, that Smith employed his deep understanding of rhetoric and artful indirection to advance his point of view more successfully than a direct approach would have.

Let ’em Go

What should Britain’s rulers do about the American colonies? Smith’s first-best answer was: Let ’em go. Here, Smith was direct and unequivocal. He wrote at length about the colonies as a fiscal sink for the British state, and he summed his case up in a characteristic one-sentence paragraph: “Under the present system of management, therefore, Great Britain derives nothing but loss from the dominion which she assumes over her colonies.”

Smith likened letting go of the colonies to an act of proper parenting. It was the same as granting independence to a child who had come of age, which Smith said was the Greek approach, as opposed to the Roman. “The same sort of parental affection on the one side, and filial respect on the other,” Smith wrote, “might revive between Great Britain and her colonies, which used to subsist between those of ancient Greece and the mother city from which they descended.”

In Wealth of Nations‘ final chapter, Smith returned to the benefits of the let-’em-go approach. “If any of the provinces of the British empire cannot be made to contribute towards the support of the whole empire,” he wrote, “it is surely time that Great Britain should free herself from the expence of defending those provinces in time of war, and of supporting any part of their civil or military establishments in time of peace, and endeavour to accommodate her future views and designs to the real mediocrity of her circumstances.”

Alas, proud rulers routinely deny the real mediocrity of their circumstances. Letting go of colonies is “always mortifying to the pride of every nation,” Smith observed. Moreover, letting go is “always contrary to the private interest of the governing part of it, who would thereby be deprived of the disposal of many places of trust and profit, of many opportunities of acquiring wealth and distinction.” Corrupt elites refuse the first-best answer.

Therefore, Smith suggested a second-best option.

The Art of Indirection

Smith’s second-best option was a trans-Atlantic union between Britain and the American colonies. But was this course offered in earnest? In my view, Smith acted like union was more possible and more desirable than he really thought it would be.

Why would Smith put on an act? Because his talk about forming a union was really aimed at helping opponents of American independence see the folly of their ways. As Smith explained in his lectures on rhetoric, some situations call for indirection; thus, we “are to conceal our design.” Smith understood that nobody likes to be in the position of an inferior corrected by a superior. Readers want to identify themselves with the superiority of insight. So it was often best to put the reader in a position to put it all together for himself. Smith associated this indirect method with Socrates.

Smith conceded that a trans-Atlantic union between Britain and the American colonies would face great difficulties. “I have yet heard of none, however,” he wrote, “which appear insurmountable.”

There are good reasons to doubt his earnestness here. A big one is that Smith explicitly wrote elsewhere that he doubted the political feasibility of any such union. In a document on American affairs, dated February 1778, Smith wrote: “The plan of a union with our colonies and of an American representation seems not to be agreeable to any considerable party of men in Great Britain.” Indeed, it “seems scarce to have a single advocate.” To be sure, Smith’s assessment of political possibility might have declined between 1776 and 1778. But if Smith’s ostensible second-best option (union) was really just a ploy to overcome resistance to the first-best option (let ’em go), then we may doubt that Smith ever saw any political possibility in the first place.

What is more, Wealth of Nations elaborated on the impracticality of governing across the expanse of the Atlantic, which is what union would have entailed. “The distance of the colony assemblies from the eye of the sovereign, their number, their dispersed situation, and their various constitutions, would render it very difficult to manage them,” he wrote. “The unavoidable ignorance of administration…the offences which must frequently be given, the blunders which must constantly be committed in attempting to manage them in this manner, seems to render such a system of management altogether impracticable with regard to them.”

Such points had been made by others. Referring to the American colonies in 1775, for example, Edmund Burke noted that, “three thousand miles of ocean lie between you and them.” Trans-Atlantic republicanism would be absurd enough in our Zoom age; in 1776, when each single piece of a dialogue between someone here and someone there meant a written document traveling for months at enormous expense, meaningful representation—a hot slogan in America at the time—would obviously be a farce. The following exchange, for example, would take more than six months to complete:

“William, has winter been harsh?”

“This is William’s widow. Yes, winter was harsh. Can you come and help me raise the children?”

“I set sail in May.”

Shared experience, understanding, and negotiation would all be lacking; trust would break down; suspicion would be rampant. People would demonize distant elites, just as many did at the time in rallying for a clean break with Britain. Union, in short, was a complete nonstarter, and for good reason. Smith’s proposal was a put-on.

Read Between the Lines

When Smith talked up the desirability of union, what he meant was union as opposed to war between Britain and the American colonies. He was not saying that union was more desirable than letting the colonies go. He made his ranking perfectly plain.

Smith’s ranking of three options:

1. Let ’em go

2. Union

3. War

In elaborating how union was preferable to war, he made points that would also work for letting ’em go over war. In talking up union, he indirectly talked up letting ’em go.

It is in arguing for union over war that Smith made some of his most colorful remarks about American affairs. Offering union was better than vanquishing the Americans, he wrote, because “the blood which must be shed…is, every drop of it, the blood either of those who are, or of those whom we wish to have for our fellow-citizens.” The American War for Independence was a civil war, British versus British. Was it also a revolution? It was not like the English Revolution or the French Revolution, which saw kings beheaded. American patriots had no plan to sail to England to decapitate anyone. They sought to extricate themselves from rule by King George III and the rest—to secede, like a grown son going his own way.

Second, union was preferable to war because the Americans would be so hard to vanquish. He wrote:

The persons who now govern the resolutions of what they call their continental congress, feel in themselves at this moment a degree of importance which, perhaps, the greatest subjects in Europe scarce feel. From shopkeepers, tradesmen, and attornies, they are become statesmen and legislators, and are employed in contriving a new form of government for an extensive empire, which, they flatter themselves, will become, and which, indeed, seems very likely to become, one of the greatest and most formidable that ever was in the world. Five hundred different people, perhaps, who in different ways act immediately under the continental congress; and five hundred thousand, perhaps, who act under those five hundred, all feel in the same manner a proportionable rise in their own importance. Almost every individual of the governing party in America, fills, at present in his own fancy, a station superior, not only to what he had ever filled before, but to what he had ever expected to fill; and unless some new object of ambition is presented either to him or to his leaders, if he has the ordinary spirit of a man, he will die in defence of that station.

The self-importance swelling in the erstwhile shopkeepers and attorneys in America could, Smith pretended, be tempted in another direction: by offering union. “Instead of piddling for the little prizes which are to be found in what may be called the paltry raffle of colony faction,” he wrote, “they might then hope, from the presumption which men naturally have in their own ability and good fortune, to draw some of the great prizes which sometimes come from the wheel of the great state lottery of British politics.” In sum, Smith’s argument-by-misdirection made union sound more attractive than war, after having already made letting ’em go sound more attractive than union. The whole thing boiled down to Smith making the case for letting the colonies go.

Decline and Fall

Smith gave his British readers something else to ponder. “Such has been the rapid progress” of the American colonies “in wealth, population and improvement,” he observed, “that in the course of little more than a century, perhaps, the produce of American might exceed that of British taxation. The seat of the empire would then naturally remove itself to that part of the empire which contributed most to the general defence and support of the whole.”

In other words, a trans-Atlantic union might easily result in America eclipsing England within the British state. English parliamentarians would then find themselves on the periphery, enjoying the sea air during long voyages to a new parliamentary building in a place like Philadelphia. Furthermore, with England now at such a distance from the power center, what should the empire be called? Under the union plan, Smith suggested, Britons might look forward to calling themselves citizens of the American empire.

Smith probably designed this uproarious argument to turn the tables on his British readers and awaken them to the absurdities of both union and war, leaving letting ’em go as the only viable option for dealing with the American colonies. Readers of another famous work published in 1776, the first volume of Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, would also surely have grasped the parallels that Smith was subtly drawing. Thanks to rising industry elsewhere, the Roman capital moved from Rome to Ravenna to, finally, Constantinople. Once again, Smith advised the British to emulate the Greeks, not the Romans.

When your sons and daughters are grown and demand independence, accord them that independence.

The post Adam Smith Said Colonists Should Join the British Union. Was He Serious? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/hGQVv1b
via IFTTT