Rep Massie Hints At Impeachment If Biden Starts A War With Iran

Rep Massie Hints At Impeachment If Biden Starts A War With Iran

Authored by Dave DeCamp via AntiWar.com,

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) on Wednesday appeared to threaten to pursue the impeachment of President Biden if he started a war with Iran. Massie posted a video from 2007 on X of then-Senator Biden threatening President George W. Bush with impeachment if he went to war with Iran without congressional approval.

“I made it clear to the president that if he takes this nation to war in Iran without congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him,” Biden said in the video.

In his post, Massie wrote: “In 2007, Sen. Biden put the President on notice that he would impeach him for going to war with Iran without Congressional approval. Consider this your notice [President Biden].”

Massie’s post came amid reports that President Biden is planning to launch a weeks-long bombing campaign that could target Iranian assets outside of Iran in response to the drone attack in Jordan that killed three US troops.

The Pentagon has admitted it has no evidence Iran was involved in the drone attack beyond its arming of the Shia militias the US believes was responsible.

Another comment Biden made during the Trump administration related to Iran has surfaced amid the tensions.

“Let’s be clear: Donald Trump does not have the authority to take us into war with Iran without Congressional approval. A president should never take this nation to war without the informed consent of the American people,” he tweeted on January 6, 2020, a few days after Trump killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani by drone strike in Baghdad.

Biden has come under criticism from some members of Congress for launching strikes against the Houthis in Yemen without congressional approval, but he has continued to bomb the country.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/CMg5hU7 Tyler Durden

Mass Media Die-Off Continues As Ambitious ‘Non-Partisan’ Start-Up Suddenly Goes Dark

Mass Media Die-Off Continues As Ambitious ‘Non-Partisan’ Start-Up Suddenly Goes Dark

A news website launched just 8 months ago with $50 million and tall ambitions to rival the likes of the Los Angeles Times suddenly halted operations on Wednesday.  In so doing, The Messenger became the latest outlet to generate its own grim headlines about the financial state of journalism in the United States. 

“By closing less than a year after it launched, The Messenger will now be one of the biggest busts in the annals of online news,” writes Benjamin Mullin at The New York Times. By Wednesday evening, all content had been stripped from themessenger.com, which now only displays the outlet’s name and a general-contact email address. There are no severance packages for terminated employees, whose health insurance will come to a screeching halt

Messenger founder Jimmy Finkelstein (Evan Agostini/AP)

Founder Jimmy Finkelstein, who had envisioned that The Messenger would become an essential nonpartisan voice in an increasingly polarized media landscape, announced the move in an email to staff on Wednesday afternoon: 

“The industry has faced extraordinary challenges this past year. The economic headwinds have left many media companies fighting for survival. Unfortunately, as a new company, we encountered even more significant challenges than others and could not survive those headwinds.”

Messenger writer Jim LaPorta tweeted that Finkelstein was scooped by other outlets who contacted staff members asking about the outlet’s sudden failure: 

Another writer, Jordan Hoffman, suggested The Messenger was doomed by hubris

Right out of the gate, Finkelstein raced to build a large staff of journalists for a site that he hoped would rival 60 Minutes and Vanity Fair in the public eye. At the time, a media insider told the New York Post“Whenever a new website references an old magazine and TV show, you know they are not looking towards tomorrow.”

Finkelstein hired approximately 300 staffers, tapping people with experience at outlets that included Associated Press, Reuters, NBC News and Politico. He had a goal of surpassing 550, and his second-in-command, Richard Beckman, said the outlet aspired to hit $100 million of revenue in 2024 from “a mix of direct advertising, programmatic and sponsorship revenue across multiple platforms.” Those goals would have seen The Messenger zoom from zero to surpassing the reach of Conde Nast and the Post in under two years. It never came close.   

Beckman is said to have been a major part of the The Messenger‘s failure. Company insiders told The Daily Beast that the Conde Nast veteran spent like the startup had already reached its lofty goals, blowing money on expensive leases and a hundred grand on office snacks

There were also ongoing editorial controversies, with some editors bailing within mere days of the site going live, recoiling over clickbait headlines and aggregated news content. In late 2023, Finkelstein ruffled feathers by reportedly directing that articles about Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial were to be kept off The Messenger‘s homepage. The two are said to be friends. 

The Messenger‘s explosion adds another plume of smoke to the disastrous US media hellscape. In 2023, more than 20,000 media jobs vanished. Last week alone, the Los Angeles Times laid off 120 employees — equal to about 20% of its newsroom — while Time Magazine terminated about 30 workers.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/A8NKwtC Tyler Durden

Premature Reports Of ‘Positive’ Breakthrough On Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Deal

Premature Reports Of ‘Positive’ Breakthrough On Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Deal

Update(1335ET): Oil has reversed, and is now surging, with Bloomberg providing the following limited details of what appears to be positive momentum, but not yet a “done deal”…

The people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations, said conversations are still in the early stages and a breakthrough isn’t expected in the coming days.

Qatar presented Hamas with a proposal that would see a 45-day pause and the release of some Palestinian prisoners in exchange for all the women, children and elderly Israeli hostages, according to one official briefed on the talks.

A now deleted Al Jazeera tweet triggered premature headlines moments ago, causing oil to briefly react and drop on the news. But now…

QATAR OFFICIAL: THERE IS NO CEASEFIRE DEAL YET FOR GAZA: RTRS

* * *

Qatar has announced Israel has agreed to the major ceasefire proposal which has been worked on intensely for over the past week. Qatar has also said Hamas has issued ‘positive confirmation’, according to Al Jazeera.

Oil plunged on the news, and amid the first hopeful sign in months that Gaza could witness a breakthrough ceasefire…

The negotiation efforts have involved not only Qatar but Egypt too, with the latest days of most intense talks happening in Paris, involving CIA Director William Burns.

“The proposed three-part deal, formulated during international intelligence chief meetings in Paris, includes a notable provision—Hamas’s demand for the release of 150 Palestinian prisoners for each female Israeli soldier set free,” Israeli media sources have noted.

Israel has sought the release of all prisoners held in Gaza by the end of a multi-phased plan, which could see a 2-month “pause” in fighting – though Netanyahu has still consistently expressed the goal of seeing Hamas totally eradicated.

developing…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 13:35

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/bL7rZQu Tyler Durden

Princeton ‘State Of The University’-Letter Claims Critics Use Anti-Semitism Concerns “As A Stalking Horse For Other Agendas”

Princeton ‘State Of The University’-Letter Claims Critics Use Anti-Semitism Concerns “As A Stalking Horse For Other Agendas”

Authored by Daniel Idfresne via Campus Reform,

Princeton University President Christopher L. Eisgruber said certain critics of America’s universities use “public outrage about antisemitism” as an excuse to justify “other agendas.”

On Jan. 18, Eisgruber published his annual “State of the University Letter” that addresses “the state of the University, its progress toward strategic goals, and major issues relevant to our mission and higher education more broadly.”

Though acknowledging that “Antisemitism is an ugly and vicious form of hatred that has produced horrific suffering and injustice throughout history” that is “always unacceptable,” Eisgruber claimed that “Some people . . . have seized upon public outrage about antisemitism as a stalking horse for other agendas, including, most notably, attacks upon the efforts that we and others make to ensure that colleges and universities are places where students, faculty, researchers, and staff from all backgrounds can thrive.”

Some of these arguments are nakedly partisan jeremiads, but others come from centrist voices. A prominent example of the latter variety is a widely viewed six-minute video opinion piece by the respected CNN journalist Fareed Zakaria alleging that ‘American universities have been neglecting a core focus on excellence in order to pursue a variety of agendas—many of them clustered around diversity and inclusion,’” he continued.

Eisgruber then criticized Zakaria’s stance, saying that “[t]hese attacks are wrong. America’s leading universities are more dedicated to scholarly excellence today than at any previous point in their history, and our commitment to inclusivity is essential to that excellence.”

He added that it is “wrong” to “insist that there is a choice to be made between resolutely seeking excellence and aggressively promoting inclusivity.”

Eisgruber also hit back against Zakaria’s claim that universities have not been performing well in defending Jewish students against anti-Semitism on campus, alleging that “Princeton and other universities do support the wellbeing of Jewish students in many ways, including through workshops on Jewish identity and antisemitism and through dynamic and attractive versions of what might—for those who like the terminology more than I do—be called ‘safe spaces.’”

On Jan. 29, Campus Reform reported on a Princeton student journalist who was bullied by a pro-Palestinian student while covering a protest. The student journalist was then penalized by Princeton, a decision that was condemned by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and the Anti-Defamation League.

Eisgruber also sent a letter on Dec. 13 suggesting that MIT President Sally Kornbluth and since-resigned Harvard University and University of Pennsylvania presidents Claudine Gay and Liz Magill were not met with “civility and respect” during last December’s congressional hearing “in which all three refused to state that ‘calling for the genocide of Jews’ is unequivocally unacceptable on their campuses,” reported Campus Reform.

Campus Reform has reached out to Princeton for comment. This article will be updated accordingly.

*  *  *

Follow Daniel Idfresne on X and Instagram.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 13:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/8ogOiGv Tyler Durden

Do New Documents Prove a COVID Lab Leak?


A beaker and documents on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions | Illustration: Lex Villena


A recently published document reveals “smoking gun” evidence of COVID-19’s lab-based origin, according to Richard Ebright, a microbiologist at Rutgers and one of the earliest proponents of the lab leak hypothesis.

Ebright is referring to an invoice that shows an order for a particular enzyme that he believes scientists used to stitch together the genome for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. However, Alina Chan, a microbiologist affiliated with MIT and Harvard and co-author of Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19, says that because the documents in questions are from early 2018, they do not constitute direct evidence, meaning there still “isn’t enough to say a lab accident happened beyond reasonable doubt.”

Emily Kopp, a science and health reporter working for the public health watchdog group U.S. Right to Know, obtained and published this latest batch of documents—which she obtained through a FOIA request to the U.S. Geological Survey—on January 18. The more than 1,400 pages are communications about and early drafts of the DEFUSE proposal, a grant application seeking funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to collect and manipulate bat-borne viruses. EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based nonprofit group, authored the grant, which they proposed as a collaboration between U.S.-based virologists and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the lab located in the city where the first known cases of COVID-19 appeared. DARPA ultimately rejected the proposal as too risky, but critics like Ebright believe that the work likely continued on in Wuhan anyway.

Kopp joined Reason‘s Zach Weissmueller to discuss the documents on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions. Also joining them was mathematical biologist Alex Washburne, who co-authored a pre-print in October 2022 arguing the genome of SARS-CoV-2 had a “fingerprint” indicating that it was created in a lab. The virus that scientists proposed creating in the newly released DEFUSE documents shares several characteristics that Washburne and his colleagues flagged in the study, such as unusually uniform segment lengths and the presence of the enzyme that Ebright flagged as a “smoking gun.”

In this conversation, they discuss the documents in detail, the ways in which they validate predictions in Washburne’s paper, the remaining unknowns in the COVID origin case, comments from EcoHealth Alliance founder Peter Daszak seemingly downplaying that most of the proposed virology work would be done in China, and the difficulty of getting the scientific and media establishments to take new evidence pointing to a lab origin seriously.

Watch the full conversation on Reason‘s YouTube channel or on the Just Asking Questions podcast feed on Apple, Spotify, or your preferred podcatcher.

 

Sources referenced in this conversation:

U.S. Right to Know: U.S. scientists proposed to make viruses with unique features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan

DEFUSE: PREEMPT Volume 1 no ESS HR00118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE 

Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2 | bioRxiv

Kristian Anderson criticizes Washburne’s study: “Poppycock” 

New Research Points to Wuhan Market as Pandemic Origin | The New York Times

The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic | Science

House Minority Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Committee Report on Origins of COVID-19 Pandemic

The post Do New Documents Prove a COVID Lab Leak? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/wZx1AM3
via IFTTT

The US has a $6 trillion problem over the next twelve months

Yesterday the Treasury Department announced that they expected to increase the national debt by a whopping $760 billion this quarter alone… and another $202 billion next quarter.

In short that means almost $1 trillion added to the national debt just in the first half of this year. And, again, these are the Treasury Department’s own estimates.

Obviously, that’s a pretty horrible result; even a senior Treasury official acknowledged that they have “significantly increased” their bond sales and the national debt. Not that they’re doing anything to stop the trend.

But there’s an even greater risk that the Treasury Department faces this year that is hardly being discussed anywhere.

Over the next twelve months, more than $6 trillion in existing US government debt is set to mature… and will need to be paid back somehow.

So, to give you an example, back in 2014, the federal government issued $264 billion in 10-year Treasury notes.

Well, it’s now 2024, i.e. ten years later. Meaning that $264 billion worth of 10-year notes issued in 2014 will become due and payable this year.

In 2017, they issued $368.8 billion worth of 7-year notes. And those 7-year notes issued in 2017 are due and payable this year.

You get the idea. The point is that the total sum of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills outstanding that will become due and payable this year exceeds $6 trillion.

So, in ADDITION to the $1 trillion in NEW debt that they’re forecasting just in the first six months of 2024, the Treasury Department is also going to have to pay back $6 trillion of existing debt.

Naturally the Treasury Department doesn’t have $6 trillion lying around to pay back its bondholders. So instead of paying anyone back, they just borrow new money to repay the old money.

Now, this doesn’t actually increase the national debt. If they borrow $6 trillion in new bonds, but then pay back $6 trillion in old bonds, the net change to the debt is ZERO.

So, what’s the problem?

The problem is that interest rates are MUCH higher than they were 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years ago when those old bonds were first issued.

In 2021, for example, the Treasury Department issued almost $1 trillion in 3-year bonds back when interest rates were nearly 0%.

But since those 3-year bonds from 2021 are due and payable this year, the Treasury Department will have to borrow new money at today’s interest rates… which are hovering around FOUR percent.

And higher interest rates mean that the government’s annual interest bill will soar.

Think about it like this– $6+ trillion of existing debt needs to be refinanced. And given how much higher interest rates are, this will likely cost the government more than $200 billion per year in additional interest payments.

PLUS, they’re expecting $1 trillion of new debt in the first six months of the year, plus probably another $1 trillion in the second half of the year.

Altogether, the government’s total interest bill could easily increase by more than $300 billion per year in 2024.

And this same trend will continue in 2025, 2026, and beyond.

Right now, gross interest on the debt is already roughly $1 trillion per year. But in three years’ time, annual interest could surpass $2 trillion annually. And in 10 years, annual interest could reach $4 to $5 trillion.

Anyone who thinks this isn’t an obvious, catastrophic problem in the making (which demands immediate attention) needs to have his/her head examined.

And yet the government is full of people who shake hands with thin air and happily ignore the present and future carnage that they’re creating.

Don’t hold your breath for the Inspired Idiots in charge to fix this; I’ve written before that there is a VERY narrow window of opportunity to solve this problem… but they’re doing absolutely nothing about it.

But that doesn’t mean that you or I have to be held hostage by their incompetence.

I’ve argued that one of the highly probable consequences of this mess will be SIGNIFICANT inflation. After all, most likely it will be the Federal Reserve that facilitates all this new debt.

This is what the Fed has done for most of the past 15 years. Just look at the huge run-up in the national debt between 2020 and 2022; over 80% of that money (~$5 trillion) came from the Federal Reserve.

And if creating $5 trillion in new money resulted in 9% inflation, how much inflation will we see if the Fed creates $15 to $20 trillion of new money? No one knows for sure, but it probably won’t be 2%.

But if we can make such a strong argument for inflation… and anticipate a steep rise in prices over the next 5-10 years, there’s no reason why we can’t take steps NOW to reduce the impact of future inflation, or even benefit from it.

This doesn’t even necessarily require a lot of capital. For example, one could invest in long-term options on certain assets (including gold or silver futures), so that a small amount of money could pay out very large returns down the road.

The key point is that there are plenty of sensible ways to plan for future inflation, which we will continue to discuss in future letters.

But this isn’t even Plan B thinking anymore. Anticipating inflation should be Plan A.

Source

from Schiff Sovereign https://ift.tt/QBRvs6c
via IFTTT

Jimmy Kimmel Suggests Joe Biden Having Dementia Is A “Crazy Conspiracy Theory”

Jimmy Kimmel Suggests Joe Biden Having Dementia Is A “Crazy Conspiracy Theory”

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Modernity.news,

During a monologue about the Taylor Swift psyop, late night comedian Jimmy Kimmel suggested that it was a ‘crazy conspiracy theory’ to believe that Joe Biden might be suffering from dementia.

Kimmel weighed in on assertions by Trump supporters that the NFL might be involved in promoting Swift as part of a voter recruitment strategy to help the Biden campaign.

As we previously highlighted, the media has played up the NFL angle in a bid to dismiss the entire issue, attacking conservatives who talked about it as unhinged cranks.

This despite the fact that the New York Times reported the Biden campaign does have a Taylor Swift strategy that could involve Biden appearing at one of Swift’s concerts before the election.

Kimmel opened his monologue by calling Vivek Ramaswamy a “clown who ran for president” who then “added his nut voice to the chorus of cuckoos” surrounding the speculation over Swift being used as a Democrat operative.

He then characterized the belief that Joe Biden is suffering from early onset dementia as part of “some serious crazy talk” being circulated by Republicans.

“So let me get this straight,” said Kimmel.

The same people who believe Joe Biden has dementia and needs Kamala Harris to feed him butterscotch tapioca every night also believe that he has somehow planned and executed a diabolically brilliant scheme to fix the NFL playoffs so the biggest pop star in the world could pop up on the Jumbotron during the Super Bowl during a Kia and a Tostitos commercial to hypnotize her 11-year-old fans into voting for Joe Biden?”

“These people think football is fake and wrestling is real,” he added.

Kimmel’s attempt to throw in Biden’s very clear cognitive decline with the substantially more nebulous claim that NFL games are being rigged is an interesting way of trying to dismiss something real that is very much harming Biden’s poll numbers.

A CNN poll released last year found that 56 per cent Democrats and 73 percent of Americans are seriously concerned about Biden’s mental competence.

Those concerns are also evidently shared within the White House itself.

A top White House cybersecurity official told James O’Keefe that “they can’t say it publicly,” but the White House wants to replace Kamala Harris and “Biden is definitely slowing down”.

As we reported last week, Trump has challenged Biden to a cognitive test, although the likelihood of that happening is about as probable as Taylor Swift endorsing Trump 2024.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 12:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/cbY0Cei Tyler Durden

Regional Bank Stocks Are Crashing Again…

Regional Bank Stocks Are Crashing Again…

Yesterday it was NYCB that grabbed the headlines and spoiled Powell’s day.

As we detailed here (and here), the banking crisis never went away and it now appears the rest of the market realizes that too as Regional Bank shares are extending their losses significantly today…

This morning saw the US CRE crisis go global as Aozora Bank faced the music on its balance sheet folly.

NYCB is extending losses (well below SVB lows)…

Western Alliance Bancorp is getting clubbed like a baby seal today…

Shares of Zions Bancorp, Comerica and Webster Financial are also tumbling along with Citizens Financial, Regions Financial, SouthState, Prosperity Bancshares, Schwab, PacWest, and Huntington Bancshares…

The market appears to be finally pricing in the end of the BTFP, and all the chaos that will ensue from that, as the risk perception has spread to the whole sector. Regional bank shares are puking hard today…

But, but, but, it was all looking so good, right? Regional bank shares had risen excitedly as talking heads reassured them that the ‘mini-banking-crisis’ was extinguished magnificently by The Fed…

All of which leaves us wondering… is the market starting a bank-run to call Powell’s bluff?

We’re also seeing a safe-haven, flight-to-quality bid for bonds and bullion

As a reminder, billionaire Barry Sternlicht warned yesterday that he sees more than $1 trillion of losses for office real estate, calling the properties “one asset class that never recovered” from the pandemic.

“The office market has an existential crisis right now,” which is largely a US phenomenon because workers haven’t gone back to their desks, Sternlicht said Tuesday at the iConnections Global Alts conference in Miami Beach.

Once a $3 trillion asset class, offices now are “probably worth $1.8 trillion,” said Sternlicht, chief executive officer of Starwood Capital Group.

“There’s $1.2 trillion of losses spread somewhere, and nobody knows exactly where it all is.”

Which acronym will replace BTFP and how many trillions will it inject?

the Fed removed the following sentence from the FOMC statement: “The US banking system is sound and resilient.” Cynics asked why the Fed no longer sees “the US banking system is sound and resilient” – is it a signal of rumblings in the economy near-term, or was it just a lie before, and now that bank dominoes are again falling, will Powell be forced to trot it back out?

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 12:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wJnZmNb Tyler Durden

COVID Inquiry Finds Lockdowns Were Terrible, While Reporters Call Bull**it On Government’s Lead Academic Advisor

COVID Inquiry Finds Lockdowns Were Terrible, While Reporters Call Bull**it On Government’s Lead Academic Advisor

Authored by Paul D. Thacker via The Disinformation Chronicle,

While America has chosen to ignore most COVID policy failures, unless they can be used to score partisan political points, the British government has been running a COVID Inquiry, examining mistakes the government made to better prepare for the next pandemic. The proceedings took an interesting turn in recent days, when top government advisor Mark Woolhouse at the University of Edinburgh lambasted the BBC for misrepresenting COVID risks to promote harmful lockdowns, while senior government advisor Devi Sridhar, also at the University of Edinburgh, kind of admitted that she maybe, perhaps gave poor advice—alerting several reporters who began calling her out on social media and documenting her blatant lies.

The statements by both academics underscore that lockdowns failed as a pandemic policy but were enforced with the help of media who, instead of challenging government policies, began promoting them.

I find it extraordinary that no formal assessment of the expected impact of lockdown was implemented,” testified Woolhouse, who studies infectious disease epidemiology, and advises the Scottish government on pandemics. “This despite it being obvious that lockdown was likely to cause severe harms to the economy, education, mental health, health care access and societal well-being … exacerbating inequalities.”

Government advice on pandemics did not “consider the wider harms caused by the response to the pandemic” such as government policies that led to school closures and the banning of outdoor activities, even though the virus did not transmit well outdoors, Woolhouse said. He added that the risk of a child dying from COVID was “about the same as the risk of that child being struck by lightning in the playground” causing the government to ignore that the virus was “ten thousand times” more deadly to the elderly.

“In the media, the BBC television news repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm, again creating a misleading impression of who was at greater or lesser risk,” Woolhouse testified. “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.

In fact, the BBC ran a fact check in early 2021 that promoted lockdowns, and the BBC’s much derided “disinformation reporter” Marianna Spring wrote an article months later that compared lockdown critics to climate denialists:

Anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine Telegram groups, which once focused exclusively on the pandemic, are now injecting the climate change debate with the same conspiratorial narratives they use to explain the pandemic.

The posts go far beyond political criticism and debate – they’re full of incorrect information, fake stories and pseudoscience.

Ignoring their complicity in promoting government mistakes, the BBC focused coverage on Woolhouse’s criticism of harmful policies such as school closures and lockdowns, while other outlets, such as The Telegraph, headlined barbs Woolhouse shot at the BBC.

Another high point of the government’s COVID inquiry involved Devi Sridhar, a professor of global health who closely advised Scotland’s leader during the pandemic. Sridhar now claims that she didn’t advise the government on “Zero COVID” policies to eliminate the virus—policies that all experts now agree were harmful.

In a rambling explanation that stretches on for several pages of transcript, Sridhar testified that she was for Zero COVID, but not really, but “yes” she was—confusing the inquiry counsel, who was forced to ask additional questions to get Sridhar to clarify her position. Several times.

“So your position—thank you for that,” said the inquiry counsel at one point. “Could I make another—repeat my plea on behalf of the stenographer?

Subscribers to The Disinformation Chronicle can read the rest here…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 02/01/2024 – 11:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/LypI5Kl Tyler Durden