Ask Elizabeth Nolan Brown Your Burning Questions About Sex Policy Right Now!

From her award-winning Reason cover story “The War on Sex Trafficking Is the New War on Drugs” to her hardboiled quantitative reporting on modern vice squads, Elizabeth Nolan Brown is your gal for smart, readable journalism about sex policy and politics. Her work was cited throughout an amicus brief in the Backpage.com First Amendment case that later got called out favorably by Judge Richard Posner in his decision siding with Backpage. Also, sex columnist Dan Savage quotes her.

Basically, she knows her sex policy stuff. And a beat like Brown’s is pretty much only possible at Reason, where we understand and love sex and commerce in equal measure.

So ask her anything over at her Twitter account using the #askalibertarian hastag. And then donate!

.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2fDW7l9
via IFTTT

Guess Who Just Approved a Pipeline to Transport Canadian Oilsands Crude?

CanadaPipelineFredChartrandZUMAPressNewscomPresident Obama nixed the Keystone XL pipeline two years ago that would have transported nearly 900,000 barrels of crude oil from Alberta’s oilsands regions to refineries on the Gulf Coast. Just in an advance of the Paris climate change conference in 2015, President Obama found that the pipeline was not our country’s national interest and declared, “The pipeline would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our economy.”

Well, another leader has decided that getting oilsands crude to foreign markets is in his country’s national interest: Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Consequently, his cabinet has approved the construction of the Kinder Morgan pipeline from Alberta that will transport about 900,000 barrels of oilsands crude per day to a port in British Columbia where it can be exported to whichever companies and countries wish to buy it. In addition, the Canadian cabinet approved the construction of the replacement for Line 3 pipeline that would transport 760,000 barrels oil from Alberta through northern Minnesota to Superior, Wisconsin.

CBC News reports:

“The decision we took today is the one that is in the best interests of Canada,” Trudeau said in announcing his government’s support for the two major projects. “It is a major win for Canadian workers, for Canadian families and the Canadian economy, now and into the future.”

When President Obama rejected the Keystone XL project, environmental activists were ecstatic; the group 350.org released a statement praising the decision:

“President Obama is the first world leader to reject a project because of its effect on the climate. That gives him new stature as an environmental leader, and it eloquently confirms the five years and millions of hours of work that people of every kind put into this fight. We’re still well aware that the next president could undo all this, but this is a day of celebration.”

In response to Trudeau’s decision, Aurore Fauret, campaign co-ordinator with 350.org had this to say:

Today’s announcement may as well have said that Canada is pulling out of the Paris climate agreement. By approving the Kinder Morgan and Line 3 pipelines, there is no way Canada can meet those commitments. Justin Trudeau has broken his promises for real climate leadership, and broken his promise to respect the rights of indigenous peoples.

In the meantime, Republicans in Congress are calling on Donald Trump to reverse Obama’s decision on the Keystone pipeline as soon as he takes office. Given the new outlets for Alberta crude, it may be too late for American workers, American families, and the American economy to “win” from the construction of the Keystone pipeline.

For more background, see my article: “The Man-Made Miracle of Oil from Sand.”

Disclosure: Five years ago, my travel expenses to visit Alberta’s oil sands were covered by the American Petroleum Institute. The API did not ask for nor does it have any editorial control over my reporting of this trip.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2fLTt89
via IFTTT

California’s New Cow Fart Regulations Totally Stink

Livestock are responsible for roughly 15 percent of the world’s greenhouse gases, but if you think getting people to stop driving their cars or using electricity is a difficult task, good luck preventing cows from farting.

California is going to try.

“This bill curbs these dangerous pollutants and thereby protects public health and slows climate change,” said Gov. Jerry Brown said in a statement when he signed the bill in September, against the wishes of the state’s farmers.

The law won’t stop cows from farting, of course, because cows are notoriously disrespectful of human-passed laws. Instead, it will make life more difficult for dairy farmers in California.

Dairy farms will be required to reduce methane emissions to 40 percent below their 2013 levels by 2030. The state will spend $50 million help offset the cost of so-called “dairy digesters,” which are intended to capture methane spewed from cows and convert it into electricity. After that, the state’s Air Resources Board will have the authority to set whatever regulations they deem necessary to reach the stated goal.

Cow farts—or “bovine entric fermentation” if you want to sound smart—pump a lot of methane into the environment. A single cow can produce up to 130 gallons of methane in a single day (even that’s not as bad as what dinosaur farts could do), and methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Even if California were to find a way to stop cows from farting—or, more likely, if it were to regulate all its dairy farms out of existence—there would be a miniscule impact on global methane levels. California isn’t even the leading producer of agricultural methane in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

On a global scale, the tiny microbes that grow on the roots of rice plants produce 30 percent of all agricultural methane on Earth.

California’s not the first to target cows in an effort to rein-in global warming. Some ethical vegetarian groups have allied with global warming activists to call for reducing the number of cows in Africa.

The attack on dairy cows is part of a broader effort to reduce California’s greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Doing that means giving a lot more power ot the state’s Air Resources Board, which now finds itself in the business of regulating what comes out of bovine buttocks. According to an Associated Press report this week, the board is hoping California’s proposal will be a model for other states to follow.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2fRknyw
via IFTTT

California’s New Cow Fart Regulations Totally Stink

Livestock are responsible for roughly 15 percent of the world’s greenhouse gases, but if you think getting people to stop driving their cars or using electricity is a difficult task, good luck preventing cows from farting.

California is going to try.

“This bill curbs these dangerous pollutants and thereby protects public health and slows climate change,” said Gov. Jerry Brown said in a statement when he signed the bill in September, against the wishes of the state’s farmers.

The law won’t stop cows from farting, of course, because cows are notoriously disrespectful of human-passed laws. Instead, it will make life more difficult for dairy farmers in California.

Dairy farms will be required to reduce methane emissions to 40 percent below their 2013 levels by 2030. The state will spend $50 million help offset the cost of so-called “dairy digesters,” which are intended to capture methane spewed from cows and convert it into electricity. After that, the state’s Air Resources Board will have the authority to set whatever regulations they deem necessary to reach the stated goal.

Cow farts—or “bovine entric fermentation” if you want to sound smart—pump a lot of methane into the environment. A single cow can produce up to 130 gallons of methane in a single day (even that’s not as bad as what dinosaur farts could do), and methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Even if California were to find a way to stop cows from farting—or, more likely, if it were to regulate all its dairy farms out of existence—there would be a miniscule impact on global methane levels. California isn’t even the leading producer of agricultural methane in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

On a global scale, the tiny microbes that grow on the roots of rice plants produce 30 percent of all agricultural methane on Earth.

California’s not the first to target cows in an effort to rein-in global warming. Some ethical vegetarian groups have allied with global warming activists to call for reducing the number of cows in Africa.

The attack on dairy cows is part of a broader effort to reduce California’s greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Doing that means giving a lot more power ot the state’s Air Resources Board, which now finds itself in the business of regulating what comes out of bovine buttocks. According to an Associated Press report this week, the board is hoping California’s proposal will be a model for other states to follow.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2fRknyw
via IFTTT

University Stuns World: Pledges To Support Free Speech, “Censorship Is Not The Answer”

Did the politically-correct insanity just reach its tipping point? Just weeks after a notably politically-incorrect Donald Trump was swept to victory in the US election, HeatSt.com's Kieran Corcoran reports a university has pledged to end its culture of censorship and no-platforming, and has instead pledged to defend free speech.

Cardiff University in Wales has said it will no longer ban events by controversial speakers, declaring “censorship is not the answer.”

The decision was made by the Cardiff University Students’ Union at their annual conference last week, where they passed a motion called “Challenge, Don’t Censor.”

 

 

The move pushes back against the tide of safe space culture which seeks to insulate students from opinions they might find challenging.

Cardiff itself was the scene of one such incident last year, playing host to a virulent campaign to shut down a speech by feminist Germaine Greer over her views on transgender surgery.

Cardiff students passed their free speech motion – the full text of which can be found on page 25 of this document – on Thursday.

 

 

The motion committed the union to the observation that “students are capable of challenging intolerable views through rigorous debate; censorship is not the answer.”

It added: “All students should be allowed a voice on campus regardless of age, sex, gender identity, race, sexual orientation, religion, political views and disability within the remits of national and devolved law.”

In pursuit of these principles, it said that “All students, no matter their views, will not be censored in so far as their actions are performed inside the law.

“Events, societies and sports clubs at the SU will not be banned as long as their actions are within the law and subject to the Union’s bylaws.”

Speaking to Heat Street about his decision to propose the motion, Cardiff student James Daly said the “negative perception” of the student body’s approach to free speech after the Greer debacle helped spur him on.

He added that few people opposed the motion at the crucial moment, though some have criticised it on social media since.

The stand against being told what they can hear and think echoes the response of a group of sixth-form students, who were due to hear from Milo Yiannopoulos before his speech was shut down by the UK Government.

In an open letter to censorious authorities, pupils from Simon Langton Grammar School expressed their dismay, saying “we do not need to be protected” from controversial speakers.

via http://ift.tt/2g78CS8 Tyler Durden

Oil Soars 9% As OPEC Deal Details Emerge

And the funniest news of the day: this is who will monitor the deal to make sure everyone complies:

  • KUWAIT, ALGERIA, VENEZUELA TO MONITOR OPEC DEAL: DEL PINO

Update: It appears the short-squeeze ammo has run out…

 

*  *  *

As the details of the OPEC ‘deal‘ emerge during the press conference, WTI Crude prices have just burst through $49 stops (from 11/22 highs) and are up 9% on the day.

Headlines:

  • AL-FALIH: OPEC HAS MADE A ‘VERY HEALTHY’’ AGREEMENT
  • AL-FALIH: OPEC DEAL WILL START IN JAN
  • AL-FALIH: SAUDI OIL OUTPUT LIMIT 10.058M B/D
  • IRAQ AGREED TO CUT OUTPUT BY 209K B/D, KUWAIT OIL MINISTER SAYS
  • IRAQI MINISTER SAYS RUSSIA AGREED TO CUT OUTPUT BY 300,000 B/D
  • IRAQ OIL MINISTER CONFIRMS HIS COUNTRY WILL CUT OIL PRODUCTION
  • KUWAIT WILL CUT OIL OUTPUT 130K B/D, OIL MINISTER SAYS
  • SAUDI ARABIA: NON-OPEC TO CONTRIBUTE 600K BPD TO CUTS
  • RUSSIA HAS OFFERED 300,000 B/D OIL CUT: QATAR
  • LIBYA SEES NON-OPEC COUNTRIES COOPERATING IN OUTPUT DEAL
  • NON-OPEC NATIONS HAVE GIVEN COMMITMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN DEAL
  • IRAN TO CUT PRODUCTION BY 90K B/D FROM OCT. LEVEL: ZANGANEH
  • IRAN OIL MINISTER: OPEC WILL CUT PRODUCTION TO 32.5 MLN BPD
  • OPEC NEEDS COOPERATION WITH OTHER OIL PRODUCERS: U.A.E. MIN
  • UAE SAYS OPEC NEEDS COOPERATION WITH `OTHERS’
  • NIGERIA IS EXEMPT FROM AGREEMENT TO CUT OUTPUT BY 1.2M B/D
  • OPEC ESTABLISHED MONITORING COMMITTEE TO IMPLEMENT DEAL: SADA
  • SECONDARY SOURCES WILL BE BASIS FOR MONITORING: QATAR
  • OPEC’S NEW 32.5M B/D OUTPUT TARGET INCLUDES INDONESIA: SEC-GEN
  • OPEC TO PUBLISH A TABLE WITH ALL INDVIDUAL COUNTRIES’ TARGETS
  • OPEC TO MEET AGAIN ON MAY 25 2017, SAYS QATAR MINISTER, OPEC INTENDS TO EXTEND THE CUTS THEN BY ANOTHER 6 MONTHS
  • RUSSIA TO MAKE STATEMENT ON OUPUT CUTS IN NEXT FEW HOURS: SADA

 

And the resultant squeeze…

 

Some context…

via http://ift.tt/2fDOXNx Tyler Durden

FX Markets Are Turmoiling

The US Dollar index is soaring, up most in a week as OPEC events and the London Fix ripple through FX markets. Yen, Euro, and Aussie Dollar are all plunging…

FX chaos into the EU close…

 

EURUSD breaks below 1.06 and USDJPY blows thru 114…

 

And the Aussie Dollar is collapsing after last night's terrible housing data…

via http://ift.tt/2gVAZHh Tyler Durden

Wall Street Reacts To Steve Mnuchin Choice For Treasury Secretary

Following the news that Steve Mnuchin would be US Trasury Secretary, Wall Street analysts offered mixed predictions on which policies Donald Trump’s choice for Treasury secretary may pursue, as they have little to go on other than Mnuchin’s background with Goldman, buying/selling the former Indy Mac.

The prevailing consensus is that Mnuchin’s Wall Street past will lead to easing regulations, tax policies; but at the same time, Mnuchin may not help larger banks as he may focus on regionals and/or seek to distance himself from his GS/IndyMac past. For now optimism dominates, as banks gain, with the KBW banks index up as much as 2% to highest intraday since May 2008. Not surprisingly, Goldman Sachs is up as much as 3.5% to highest since Dec. 2007.

Earlier, Mnuchin said that FNMA, FMCC should exit government’s grip and didn’t mimic Republicans who’ve said FNMA, FMCC should be wound down or eliminated. As a result the stock of the GSEs has soared, with Fannie up as much as 32% to highest since Aug. 2014; Freddie up as much as 28%, also since Aug. 2014

Among Mnuchin’s biggest fans, Carl Icahn had a glowing review of Mnuchin, and new Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross:

Also not surprisingly, former Goldman CEO and former Treasury Secretary Hank :Paulson also applaued the pick of Mnuchin:

Others were more reserved. Here is a sampling of reactions:

FBR (Edward Mills)

  • Mnuchin’s Wall Street, banking background sends “strong signal” he’ll pursue “much less aggressive” regulatory, policy agendas, though little is known of specific policy positions
  • Likely “net positive” for financials as shows Trump’s willingness to pick individuals from industry who may change current financial policy; may foreshadow painting DoddFrank as drag on the economy, economic growth
  • Has “significant powers” related to FNMA, FMCC conservatorship; tenure as head of mortgage bond trading at GS, role at OneWest demonstrate “significant background” in mortgage industry

COWEN (Jaret Seiberg)

  • Positive for regional banks; cautious about influence on biggest banks, GSEs, as Trump adviser Steve Bannon (mega- bank critic, self-described “economic nationalist”) may play bigger role on bank policy from White House
  • Nomination isn’t GS ‘‘revival”; cites Mnuchin’s ‘‘second career’’ distancing him from GS, including creating OneWest from IndyMac’s remains, selling it to CIT, which suggests he understands regional banks’ challenges; GS ‘‘lineage” might force him to be tough on mega banks
  • Notes Trump on campaign trail “ripped” Wall Street, vowed not to let Wall Street control the country, yet picked former GS partner as Treasury secretary, met Nov. 29 with top GS official, is expected to name another GS alumnus/SkyBridge’s Anthony Scaramucci as top Treasury deputy
  • Says Scaramucci “best known as the former Obama supporter” who once asked president when he’d stop bashing Wall Street
  • Cowen still worried about push to leverage capital from risk-based capital (supported by conservatives); watching for Trump nomination of Fed vice chairman for supervision; may give job to conservative to build goodwill with party; doesn’t see “quick deal” for FNMA, FMCC

KBW (Brian Gardner)

  • “Unorthodox” pick creates uncertainty about future policy as Mnuchin is “blank slate,” with broad experience in finance, who seems to have said or written little on financial regulation, tax policy
  • Too early to know whether selection will be positive or negative for financial services
  • Notes any Dodd-Frank changes will have to pass Senate, possible Senate Democrats filibuster; Mnuchin political skill in achieving compromise “remains to be seen”

HEIGHT SECURITIES (Edwin Groshans)

  • Mnuchin’s comments positive for GSE pfd, common shareholders
  • At the same time, est. FNMA would need to raise at least $190b of capital, FMCC would need $119b in order to meet minimum risk-based capital requirements — which means no capital would flow to shareholders for a decade or longer
  • April 20, If Fannie, Freddie Holders Win, Need ‘a Lot’ of Capital: Height

BEACON ADVISORS

  • Trump expected to direct Mnuchin early in his term to designate China as currency manipulator; Mnuchin will be “heavily involved” in shaping tax reform package congressional Republicans will shepherd through legislative process next year
  • Reported choice of Scaramucci as deputy means neither of Treasury’s top 2 people will have had prior government experience

COMPASS POINT (Isaac Boltansky)

  • Mnuchin may be “comparatively moderate voice” on financial regulations vs other potential candidates like Rep. Jeb Hensarling or John Allison, who may have advocated for “far more draconian” Dodd-Frank rollback
  • Sees populist anti-big bank rhetoric reemerging as Mnuchin will join fellow Goldman alum, at least 2 billionaires in Trump’s inner circle; Trump may face pressure to renew populist “bona fides”

Source: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/2gVF5io Tyler Durden

Decade Of Negative Real Interest Rates: Who Benefited?

Submitted by Michael Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Rudy Havenstein Tweeted an interesting chart earlier today on real negative interest rates.

I recreated the chart below and also share a chart from Doug Short on real median incomes to help put this financial repression by the Fed in proper perspective.

Decade of Negative Real Interest Rates

decade-of-negative-real-interest-rates

The above chart was created by taking the short-term treasury bill rate and subtracting the year-over-year rate of inflation as measured by the CPI.

A massive housing bubble formed in the first period real interest rates were negative. In the current prolonged period of negative rates, bubbles formed in the stock market and bond markets globally.

Outside the US, nearly three quarters of the world’s bond traded at negative interest rates.

Doug Short at Advisor Perspectives updated his series of charts on Median Household Income earlier today.

Median Household Income, Nominal and Real

medium-household-income-2016-11a

Median Household Income Growth

medium-household-income-2016-11b

Doug Short notes: The reality illustrated here is that the real median household income series spent most of the first nine years of the 21st century struggling slightly below its purchasing power at the turn of the century. Real incomes (the blue line) hit an interim peak at a fractional 0.7% in early 2008, far below the nominal illusionary interim peak (as in money illusion) of 27.2% six months later and the latest at 42%, a record high. The real median household income is now at -0.6% from its turn-of-the-century level. In essence, the real recovery from the trough has been frustratingly slow.”

Who Benefited?

  • Bailed out banks
  • Government bodies via property tax hikes, income tax hikes, sales tax hikes and collection
  • Asset holders – The wealthy

The median guy lost. Those at the bottom end got clobbered much harder. Only the top 10% or so fared well.

The primary beneficiary of QE, negative real rates, and inflation was the top 1%.

The Election

Writers still struggle to explain the election of Trump. The above charts explain clearly.

The median guy on the street is fed up by financial repression. Thanks to mainstream media, the “deplorables” are upset at corporations, at globalization, and at the failure of government to hike minimum wages.

Placing Blame Where It Belongs

Thanks to mainsteam media, which parrots the idea that inflation is good, the “deplorables” fail to blame the institution most responsible: the Fed.

Globalization is a good thing. Falling prices are a good thing.

The average guy on the street understands the latter, but not the former. The average economist, brainwashed by years of Keynesian economic training fails to understand anything.

Academia and mainstream media parrot patently false theories on the benefits of inflation and tariffs. Instead of picketing the Fed, the “deplorables” voted for Trump.

Economist Paul Krugman need only look in a mirror to see one of the reasons the “deplorables” voted the way they day. Krugman still fails to understand what happened.

Shortly after the election, Krugman made a confession: Krugman Admits He Is Clueless. That Progress will be Short-Lived

Explaining Trump

Here is a the key chart from Explaining Social Anger, Brexit, Donald Trump in One Chart.

Shrinking Middle Class

Wealth Gap

The above chart from the Wall Street Journal article IMF’s Grim Long-Term U.S. Outlook in Six Charts.

Economic Challenge to Keynesians

Of all the widely believed but patently false economic beliefs is the absurd notion that falling consumer prices are bad for the economy and something must be done about them.

I have commented on this many times and have been vindicated not only by sound economic theory but also by actual historical examples.

For a synopsis, please see Deflation Bonanza! (And the Fool’s Mission to Stop It).

My Challenge to Keynesians “Prove Rising Prices Provide an Overall Economic Benefit” has gone unanswered.

There is no answer because history and logic both show that concerns over consumer price deflation are seriously misplaced.

The Fed’s fight against deflation is amazingly counterproductive and the above charts provide ample evidence.

Routine Deflation Harmless

Routine CPI deflation is harmless. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS), did a detailed study and agrees. For details, please see Historical Perspective on CPI Deflations: How Damaging are They?

In their attempts to fight routine consumer price deflation, central bankers create extremely destructive asset bubbles that eventually collapse, setting off what they should fear – asset bubble deflation.

The final irony in this sad saga is Paul Krugman, Who Proposed Fight with Fake Outer Space Aliens to Stimulate the Economy, Now Worried About Quality of Trump’s Spending.

via http://ift.tt/2gG4jAO Tyler Durden

An interesting perspective on the War on Cash

It’s happening faster than we could have ever imagined.

Every time we turn around, it seems, there’s another major assault in the War on Cash.

India is the most notable recent example– the embarrassing debacle a few weeks ago in which the government, overnight, “demonetized” its two largest denominations of cash, leaving an entire nation in chaos.

But there have been so many smaller examples.

In the US city of New Orleans, the local government decided earlier this month to stop accepting cash payments from drivers at the Office of Motor Vehicles.

As I wrote to you recently, several branches of Citibank in Australia have stopped dealing in cash altogether.

And former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers published an article last week stating that “nothing in the Indian experience gives us pause in recommending that no more large notes be created in the United States, Europe, and around the world.”

In other words, despite the India chaos, Summers thinks we should still curtail the $100 bill.

The conclave of the high priests of monetary policy almost invariably sings the same chorus: only criminals and terrorists use high denominations of cash.

Ken Rogoff, Harvard professor and former official at the International Monetary Fund and Federal Reserve, recently published a book blatantly entitled The Curse of Cash.

Ben Bernanke’s called it a “fascinating and important book”.

And, shockingly, a number of reviews on Amazon.com praise “brilliant” Rogoff’s “visionary concepts” in his “excellent book”.

Rogoff, like most of his colleagues, contends that large bills like the $100 or 500 euro note are only used in “drug trade, extortion, bribes, human trafficking. . .”

In fact they jokingly refer to the 500-euro note as the “Bin Laden” since it’s apparently only used by terrorists.

Give me a break.

My team and I did some of research on this and found some rather interesting data.

It turns out that countries with higher denominations of cash actually have much lower crime rates, including rates of organized crime.

The research was simple; we looked at the World Economic Forum’s competitive rankings that assesses countries’ levels of organized crime, as well as the direct business costs of dealing with crime and violence.

Switzerland, with its 1,000 Swiss franc note (roughly $1,000 USD) has among the lowest levels of organized crime in the world according to the WEF.

Ditto for Singapore, which has a 1,000 Singapore dollar note (about $700 USD).

Japan’s highest denomination of currency is 10,000 yen, worth $88 today. Yet Japan also has extremely low crime rates.

Same for the United Arab Emirates, whose highest denomination is the 1,000 dirham ($272).

If you examine countries with very low denominations of cash, the opposite holds true: crime rates, and in particular organized crime rates, are extremely high.

Consider Venezuela, Nigeria, Brazil, South Africa, etc. Organized crime is prevalent. Yet each of these has a currency whose maximum denomination is less than $30.

The same trend holds true when looking at corruption and tax evasion.

Yesterday we wrote to you about Georgia, a small country on the Black Sea whose flat tax prompted tax compliance (and tax revenue) to soar.

It’s considered one of the most efficient places to do business with very low levels of corruption.

And yet the highest denomination note in Georgia is the 500 lari bill, worth about $200. That’s a lot of money in a country where the average wage is a few hundred dollars per month.

Compare that to Malaysia or Uzbekistan, two countries where corruption abounds.

Malaysia’s top cash note is 50 ringgit, worth about $11. And Uzbekistan’s 5,000 som is worth a paltry $1.57.

Bottom line, the political and financial establishments want you to willingly get on board with the idea of abolishing, or at least reducing, cash.

And they’re pumping out all sorts of propaganda to do it, trying to get people to equate crime and corruption with high denominations of cash.

Simply put, the data doesn’t support their assertion. It’s just another hoax that will give them more power at the expense of your privacy and freedom.

from Sovereign Man http://ift.tt/2gK9Djl
via IFTTT