Is This The Chart That The World Should Be Watching Closest?

The consensus – perhaps until today, judging by the performance of Japanese stocks relative to the Yen – is that Abe calling a snap election is bullish, enabling him to re-confirm his mandate to push ahead with uber-dovish devastation of the Japanese economy. However, what few are willing to consider is… what happens if the world’s greatest policy madman does not get elected? As the following chart shows, with only 4.4% of Japanese households believing they are better off in the past year, perhaps an unelected Abe is the black swan no one is considering currently…

 

From The Bank of Japan Opinion Survey…

Only 4.4% believe their situation has improved in the last year… and 48.5% believe it has worsened… this is a 6 month trend!

 

And additionally… both backward and forward looking views of economic conditions are falling fast

 

 

and 78.8% of those surveyed believe the prices rises (thanks to Abe’s Yen crushing idiocy) are unfavorable

*  *  *

Given the opposition party’s unfavorable opinion of the print-money-crush-Yen plan – one can only imagine what happens if Abe loses…

Perhaps that is why things are starting to decouple?

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1F5nHKP Tyler Durden

The Eurozone’s QE Problem

Submitted by Lance Roberts of STA Wealth Management,

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1BOoHVE Tyler Durden

Japanese Trade Deficit Streak Hits Record 44 Months, Yen & Stocks Decoupling

While hopes of the J-Curve recovery in the deficit are long forgotten in the annals of Goldman Sachs history, silver-lining-seekers will proclaim the very modest beat in tonight’s Japanese trade deficit a moral victory for a nation whose economic data has been nothing but abysmal for months. However, the near $1 trillion Yen deficit is the 44th month in a row as exports to US and Europe rose modestly in Yen terms but dropped to China and US in volume terms. USDJPY continues its march higher (now 118.25) but, unfoirtunately for Abe’s approval ratings, Japanese stocks continue to languish an implied 1000 points behind – unable to break back above pre-GDP levels... as faith in Kuroda’s omnipotence falters.

44th month in a row…

 

And the currency and stocks are rapidly diverging…

 

Charts: bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uT4BEA Tyler Durden

These 7 Firms Paid Their CEO Over 60% More Than Uncle Sam

Seven of the 30 largest U.S. corporations paid more money to their chief executive officers last year than they paid in U.S. federal income taxes, according to a new study by Center for Effective Government and Institute for Policy Studies. As Reuters reports, the study said the seven companies, which in 2013 reported more than $74 billion in combined U.S. pre-tax profits, came out ahead on their taxes, gaining $1.9 billion more than they owed…

 

and at the same time their CEOs were paid – on average – over $17 million each.

As Congress appears set to prioritize the renewal of corporate tax breaks in the lame-duck session, this report reveals stark indicators of the extent to which large corporations are avoiding their fair share of taxes.

  • Of America’s 30 largest corporations, seven (23 percent) paid their CEOs more than they paid in federal income taxes last year.
  • Of America’s 100 highest-paid CEOs, 29 received more in pay last year than their company paid in federal income taxes—up from 25 out of the top 100 in our 2010 and 2011 surveys.

 

These 29 CEOs made $32 million on average last year. Their corporations reported $24 billion in U.S. pre-tax profits and yet, as a group, claimed $238 million in tax refunds, an effective tax rate of negative 1 percent.

The company that received the largest tax refund was Citigroup, which owes its existence to taxpayer bailouts. In 2013, Citi paid its CEO $18 million while pocketing an IRS refund of $260 million.

Three firms have made the list in all three years surveyed. Boeing, Chesapeake Energy, and Ford Motors paid their CEO more than Uncle Sam in 2010, 2011, and 2013.

*  *  *

While some of the firms dispute the findings, the study concludes its findings reflected "deep flaws in our corporate tax system."

 

Source: Center for Effective Government and Institute for Policy Studies




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uyuVlV Tyler Durden

21 Facts That Prove That Government Dependence Is Out Of Control In America

Submitted by Michael Snyder of The End of The American Dream blog,

If you could stay home and watch television, play video games and hang out with your friends all day at government expense, would you do it?  Of course most Americans that collect money from the government each month are not abusing the system.  Many truly are incapable of taking care of themselves, and others are just receiving government benefits (such as Social Security) that they feel that they have earned by a lifetime of hard work.  But with each passing year the number of Americans jumping on board “the safety net” continues to grow rapidly, and a lot of these people should be able to take care of themselves.  Today, the American people collectively receive more money from the government than they pay in taxes.  And remember, the federal government uses our money to build roads, inspect our food and fund the military as well.  So what does this say about our economy?  Could it survive without all of these debt-fueled transfer payments?  And what does this say about our society?  At one time, our nation was known for our work ethic.  What would our forefathers say about us today?  The following are 21 facts that prove that dependence on the government is out of control in America…

1. According to a Congressional Budget Office study that was just released, approximately 60 percent of all U.S. households get more in transfer payments from the government than they pay in taxes.  Here is more about this stunning report from Mark J. Perry’s Carpe Diem blog

Some additional analysis and commentary will be provided here that reveal a yet-to-be discussed major implication of the CBO report – almost the entire burden: a) of all transfer payments made to American households and b) of all non-financed government spending, falls on just one group of Americans – the top one-fifth of US households by income. That’s correct, the CBO study shows that the bottom three income quintiles representing 60% of US households are “net recipients” (they receive more in transfer payments than they pay in federal taxes), the second-highest income quintile pays just slightly more in federal taxes ($14,800) than it receives in government transfer payments ($14,100), while the top 20% of American “net payer” households finance 100% of the transfer payments to the bottom 60%, as well as almost 100% of the tax revenue collected to run the federal government. Here are the details of that analysis.

 

cbo1

 

The figures in Row 6 in the table above (and displayed in the graph above) show the amount of federal taxes paid by the average household in each income quintile minus the average amount of government transfers received by those households in 2011. For each of the three lower income quintiles, their average government transfer payments exceeded their federal taxes paid by $8,600, $12,500, and $9,100 respectively, and therefore the entire bottom 60% of US households are “net recipients” of government transfer payments.

2. About 70 percent of all government spending now goes toward dependence-creating programs.

3. From 2009 through 2013, the U.S. government spent a whopping 3.7 trillion dollars on welfare programs.

4. The percentage of the U.S. population that gets money from the federal government grew by an astounding 62 percent between 1988 and 2011.

5. According to an analysis of U.S. government numbers conducted by Terrence P. Jeffrey, there are 86 million full-time private sector workers in the United States paying taxes to support the government, and nearly 148 million Americans that are receiving benefits from the government each month.

6. According to the Survey of Income and Program Participation conducted by the U.S. Census, well over 100 million Americans are enrolled in at least one welfare program run by the federal government.  Sadly, that figure does not even include Social Security or Medicare.

7. Currently, there are somewhere around 40 million senior citizens in the United States.  By 2050, that number is projected to skyrocket to 89 million.  Supporting all of those senior citizens is going to be extraordinarily expensive.

8. Right now, more than 64 million Americans are receiving Social Security benefits.

9. Right now, more than 54 million Americans are enrolled in Medicare.

10. Right now, more than 70 million Americans are enrolled in Medicaid.

11. The number of Americans enrolled in the Social Security disability program now exceeds the entire population of the state of Virginia.

12. If the number of Americans on Social Security disability were gathered into a separate state, it would be the 8th largest state in the entire country.

13. In 1968, there were 51 full-time workers for every American on disability.  Today, there are just 13 full-time workers for every American on disability.

14. At this point, the federal government runs about 80 different “means-tested welfare programs”, and almost all of those programs have experienced substantial growth in recent years.

15. The number of Americans on food stamps has grown from 17 million in the year 2000 to more than 46 million today.

16. Ten years ago, the number of women in the U.S. that had jobs outnumbered the number of women in the U.S. on food stamps by more than a 2 to 1 margin.  But now the number of women in the U.S. on food stamps actually exceeds the number of women that have jobs.

17. Back in the 1970s, about one out of every 50 Americans was on food stamps.  Today, about one out of every 6.5 Americans is on food stamps.

18. Today, the number of Americans on food stamps exceeds the entire population of the nation of Spain.

19. According to one calculation, the number of Americans on food stamps now exceeds the combined populations of “Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.”

20. According to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies, 43 percent of all immigrants that have been in the United States for at least 20 years are still on welfare.

21. Most Americans are not earning enough to support themselves and their families without government help anymore.  The following are some statistics about wages in the U.S. from a Social Security Administration report that was recently released

-39 percent of American workers made less than $20,000 last year.

-52 percent of American workers made less than $30,000 last year.

-63 percent of American workers made less than $40,000 last year.

-72 percent of American workers made less than $50,000 last year.

In order to have a middle class, you have got to have middle class jobs, and those are disappearing from our system very rapidly.

As a result, the number of people that are financially independent continues to drop.

So what will the future look like?

Will the government eventually have to take care of almost all of us?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1t67xcL Tyler Durden

Why Japan Needs A ‘Strong’ Yen

Unfortunately, Natixis warns, the same error is being repeated by the Bank of Japan. The starting point of their analysis is the contrarian fact that Japan needs a strong yen. Japanese exports are hardly sensitive to their prices; Japan has a large proportion of “necessary” imports (commodities) whose price rises when the yen weakens. Unfortunately, Natixis warns, the Bank of Japan has just increased the size of its quantitative easing program, which will lead to a steeper depreciation of the yen. The only benefit will be a temporary rise in the Nikkei, an automatic result of the conversion of Japanese companies’ results into yen. Nothing more…

Via Natixis,

1. Japan needs a strong yen

Japan exports sophisticated, differentiated goods, which explains the low price elasticity of its exports (around 0.1).

Japan’s market share varies very little with the yen (Chart 1): the depreciation since the end of 2012 has not improved this market share.

Furthermore, Japan has a high level of necessary imports, especially commodities (Chart 2).

A depreciation of the yen increases import prices sharply, which reduces wage-earners’ purchasing power and consumption (Charts 3A and B).


 
A strong yen would therefore be positive for Japan:
• It would hardly reduce Japanese exports;
• It would reduce import prices and stimulate domestic demand significantly.

2. But the Bank of Japan has just increased the size of its quantitative easing

Even though a weak yen plunged Japan into recession (Chart 4), the Bank of Japan has just decided to increase the size of its quantitative easing (Chart 5), which will lead to a further depreciation of the yen (Chart 6) and therefore ultimately worsen the recession.

Its only positive effect is that it will lead to a rise in the Nikkei in the short term (Chart 7), particularly due to the conversion of Japanese multinationals’ earnings into yen.

It is therefore difficult to understand this policy.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uSQS0z Tyler Durden

Religious Conservatives Look to Get Out of the Civil Marriage Business

Public support for same-sex
marriage has
grown rapidly
over the past decade. The once fringe position is
now held by a majority of Americans and fully 68 percent of
millennials. Seeing the writing on the wall, some religious
conservatives are now calling on Christian ministers to refuse to
perform any state-sanctioned marriages.
The Daily Caller
reports:

Two Protestant pastors, concerned about rapidly-changing
government definitions of marriage, have started a movement
encouraging priests and ministers to refuse to perform civil
marriages.

Christopher Seitz and Ephraim Radner, Episcopal and Anglican
pastors respectively, launched “The Marriage
Pledge
” at the conservative religious journal First Things on
Tuesday.

The pledge is unambiguous in calling for what amounts to a
bright-line separation between religious and state-sanctioned
marriage:

To continue with church practices that intertwine government
marriage with Christian marriage will implicate the Church in a
false definition of marriage.

Therefore, in our roles as Christian ministers, we, the
undersigned, commit ourselves to disengaging civil and Christian
marriage
in the performance of
our pastoral duties.
We will no longer serve as
agents of the state in marriage. We will no longer sign
government-provided marriage certificates. We will ask couples to
seek civil marriage separately from their church-related vows and
blessings.
We will preside only at those weddings that
seek to establish a Christian marriage in accord with the
principles ­articulated and lived out from the beginning of the
Church’s life. [emphasis added]

Some may view this as a last ditch attempt to oppose the tide of
history, but libertarians ought to welcome it as a step toward the
removal of government from private relationships.

Marriage, after all, is in essence a private contract between
two individuals, and there is no reason why the government ought to
be able to determine who is eligible to enter into that contract
and who is not. Government involvement in marriage is a
relatively recent phenomenon
. Previously, marriage was an
institution of civil society that was dealt with under the common
law. Even today, common law marriages—legally recognized unions
between people who have not obtained a formal marriage
license—continue to exist in a range of jurisdictions, including
several
U.S. states
.

The effect of government involvement has been to politicize
marriage. It has turned a celebrated institution into a political
battleground by making its definition a zero sum game.

If we return marriage to civil society, individuals will be able
to create their own marriage contracts, and religious organizations
will be free to decide whose marriages they recognize and whose
they do not. Same-sex couples will be free to get married and have
their marriages recognized by any religious or civil society
organization that agrees to do so. Likewise, opponents of same-sex
marriage will not be forced to accept a definition they
fundamentally disagree with.

America’s founding fathers designed a system that includes the
separation of church and state. They did this to protect religious
freedom and avoid the sectarian clashes that had consumed much of
Europe. The separation of marriage and state would have a similar
effect, reducing political conflict and maximizing individual
freedom. The Protestant pastors’ marriage pledge is a step toward
such separation, and it should be both celebrated and
encouraged.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1F5355w
via IFTTT

Meanwhile, This Is What Is Really Taking Place Behind The Second US-Russian Cold War

It appears John Kerry is at it again. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says the US Secretary of State called on him to "pay no mind" to a statement by President Obama, in which Russia was included to a list of top global threats. Seeking Russia's cooperation in Iran and on the Korean Peninsula, Kerry told Lavrov to "forget about" what Obama said. As US foreign policy credibility dissolves, we leave it to Lavrov to conclude, "it is flippant," he jabs, "it’s not appropriate for a powerful country to have such a consumer attitude to its partners – where you’re needed, help us; where you’re not, obey us."

As RT reports,

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says US Secretary of State John Kerry called on him to “pay no mind” to a statement by President Obama, in which Russia was included to a list of top global threats.

 

President Obama voiced the three most significant global threats at the UN General Assembly in September. Ebola topped his list, followed by “Russian aggression in Europe.” In third place was the threat represented by the Islamic State extremist group.

And RBTH adds,

"The first time I took note of the listing of threats that President Obama took the liberty of doing was when I spoke at the UN General Assembly. Some time later, talking to John Kerry not so long ago, I asked him what it was supposed to mean. He said: "Forget about it".

 

He said "forget about it" because at that moment he wanted to discuss how we would coordinate our approaches toward resolving the [problem of the] Iranian nuclear program and the situation on the Korean Peninsula," Lavrov said during a regular 'government hour' hearing at the State Duma on Wednesday.

 

"You see, it's unseemly for a major and great power to take such a consumerist approach toward its partners. Where we need you, please help me, and where I want to punish you, obey me," he said.

*  *  *

Not exactly the angry picture of cold-war-ism that Obama projects to the outside world as 'costs' are imposed on Europe!!

Do nothing stupid!!

*  *  *

Once again 'The Flexible President' rears his ugly head… here is an artist's impression of what was said last week:

Obama: "So how did you like that whole "costs" part? Was it too much? I think they bought it."

Vladimir: "You have been fantastic. Truly flexible, and so persuasive: I almost believed it myself. Great job comrade."




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1F51r3H Tyler Durden

Why Japan’s Money Printing Madness Matters

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

This is getting hard to believe. The announcement that Japan has plunged into a triple dip recession should have been lights out for Abenomics. But, no, its madman prime minister has now called a snap election to enlist more public support for his campaign to destroy what remains of Japan’s economy.

And what’s worse, he’s not likely to be stopped by the electorate or even the leadership of Japan Inc, which presumably should know better. Here’s what Japan leading brokerage had to say about the “unexpected” 1.6% drop in Q3 GDP—- compared to the consensus expectation of a 2.2% gain and after the upward revised shrinkage of 7.3% in Q2.

We think that the economy is gradually improving,” said Tomo Kinoshita, an economist at Nomura Securities. “There’s no reason to be pessimistic about the economy going forward.”

Really? How in the world can an economist perched at the epicenter of Japan Inc. think that its economy is improving when Japan’s constant dollar GDP has now fallen back to pre-Abenomics levels; and, in fact, is no higher than it was in late 2007 prior to the “financial crisis”? Indeed, aside from the Q1 pull-forward of spending to beat the consumption tax increase, Japan’s economy has remained stranded on the flat-line it attained after world trade recovered from its 2008-2009 plunge.

Historical Data Chart

But that’s only the most recent iteration of the stagnation story. Japan has actually been treading water for a long-time—going all the way back to July 1989 when the monumental bubble created by the BOJ during the 1980s was cresting.

Japan’s index of total industrial production during July of that peak bubble year printed at 96.8. So here’s the real shocker: It was still printing at 96.8 in July 2014. That’s right—- after 25 years of the greatest government debt and money printing spree in recorded history, Japan’s industrial production has gone exactly nowhere.

Given that baleful history and the self-evident failure of the Keynesian elixir to cure Japan’s economic stagnation problem, it might be asked why the entire country seemingly moves in lock-step toward bankruptcy behind the sheer foolishness of Abenomics. That’s especially the case because even the short-run impacts have been self-evidently damaging to the real economy and have been utterly inconsistent with promised results.

To wit, Abenomics was supposed to send exports soaring and the trade accounts back into the black, thereby adding to GDP and household incomes. But what it has actually done has been to slash the global purchasing power of the yen by 35% since early 2013, causing Japan’s bill for imported energy, industrial materials and manufactured components and consumer goods to soar.

Accordingly, Japan’s trade accounts have remained mired in red ink, thereby defeating the fundamental “beggar-thy-neighbor” predicate of Abenomics. As shown in the second panel below, it’s trade account for the first 9 months of 2014 spewed 11 trillion yen of red ink or double its level in the year before Abenomics (2012). Annualized in dollar terms, the once and mighty export powerhouse of Japan has experienced a $200 billion swoon in its trade balance since 2010.

ABOOK Oct 2014 Japan Trade Balance

Moreover, Japan’s soaring import prices and cost of living, coupled with the utterly necessary increase in its consumption tax last April, have cause real household incomes to shrink by 6%. Thus, if Japan’s aging retirement colony could consume its way out of stagnation, which it can’t, Abenomics has clearly made matters worse on even that front line of the Keynesian cure.

ABOOK Oct 2014 Japan Madness HH Incomes

Notwithstanding this self-evident, negative short-run impact, however, Japan soldiers on toward disaster with Abenomics for one overpowering reason. It is effectively bankrupt and has therefore embraced an entirely fictional narrative about its plight in order to avoid confronting the awful truth about its fiscal and economic circumstances.

This convenient fiction is the “deflation” myth, and the argument is that Japan’s only hope for eventually corralling its huge public debt is to first decisively break-away from that albatross. Only with positive inflation and a resurrection of its historic rate of GDP gains, it is claimed, can Japan hope to grow out from under its crushing public debt ratio of nearly 230%. Indeed, mimicking some latter day version of the Reagan supply-siders’ voodoo economics, Abe’s top economic advisors argue that only by adding more debt in the short-run can the long-run debt problem be contained.

“This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get ourselves out of deflation,” Etsuro Honda, an economic adviser to the prime minister, told reporters Tuesday. “From this perspective, it is dangerous to raise the consumption tax.”

Here’s the problem. Japan has spent the last 35 years burying itself in debt, off-shoring its industrial economy and getting old. There is no conceivable real growth rate, therefore, that can overcome the runaway fiscal debt burden that it has accumulated since 1980. As shown below, its public leverage ratio has risen by 5X relative to its national income during that period.

Historical Data Chart

In this context, the BOJ’s 2% inflation target come hell or high water is a little more understandable, even if profoundly incendiary.  At 2% inflation forever, all of Japan’s $12 trillion mountain of public debt would have to be monetized or the carry cost—which already consumes 25% of its revenues—–would soar. That, in turn, would drive Japan into literal fiscal bankruptcy or transform its vast retirement colony into a poorhouse owing to savage tax increases and benefit cuts.

But, of course, there is not a shred of evidence that 2% inflation generates any more real output growth than 0.5%, but that’s not the point. The pro-inflation policy of Japan is about nothing other than depreciating its towering public debt. And Kuroda’s madcap 80 trillion yen per year money printing campaign is just a naked pretext for monetizing the prodigious flow of Japan’s budgetary red ink.

copy_of_figure2.gif

Stated differently, the Keynesian priesthood has invented an utterly groundless deflation ogre in order justify rampant monetary expansion in the vain hope that financial bubbles will levitate the real economy. But the latter delusion has been already disproved twice this century, and has now been validated once again by the short-lived fiasco of Abenomics. That is, in just 22 months Japan’s stock market has doubled, but its real GDP is back where it started and real household incomes have been pushed into the drink.

There is a reason this repudiation of Keynesian money printing is not just an anomalous problem relating to Japan’s unique history and economic structure. Namely, the phony “deflation” theory underlying the financial madness of Kuroda and Abe is readily portable. It has already been embraced by European policy-makers and will be arriving in the North American precincts soon.

So it is worth documenting yet again. In the entire 25 years since Japan’s financial bubble burst there has never been a semblance of meaningful consumer price deflation in Japan. Even the core CPI is well above it 1990 level:

Historical Data Chart

And on the theory that over any extended period of time, people do eat and warm themselves in winter, it is necessary to view Japan’s long-term trend for the overall CPI. What is shows is not deflation, but near perfect price stability. That is, after the considerable rise in consumer prices during the 1980s, its price index has remained more or less constant ever since its financial bubble was punctured in the early 1990s.

Historical Data Chart

There is not a shred of evidence that this wholesome price stability has caused Japan’s consumers to save too much or defer spending that they could otherwise afford. In fact, Japan’s savings rate has cratered during this period, dropping from more than 20% of household income prior to 1980 to hardly 3% today. That’s the opposite of what the deflation theory implies. What has actually deflated in Japan is its gigantic asset bubble, and that is something that even its prodigious money printing has proved incapable of reversing.

 

In short, they Keynesian apparatchiks have created a straw man that suits the purposes of their political masters on the fiscal front by rationalizing the monetization of endless amounts of public debt; and it empowers the state’s central banking branch to engage in plenary manipulation of the entire financial system on the misbegotten theory that fiat credit and bubble wealth can cause real production, incomes and wealth to rise.

Stated differently, Keynesian fiscal policies and central banking regimes have buried the public sectors of most of the world’s major economies in unsustainable debt. Now they propose to double down on more of the same because an entire generation of politicians have been house-trained in permanent fiscal profligacy and endless kicking of the fiscal can down the road.

To be sure, in putting off Japan’s day of fiscal reckoning once again, this time until  2017, Prime Minister Abe is proving himself to be a certifiable madman. In short order, however, he will have plenty of company all around the planet.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/11v74cy Tyler Durden