Ukraine Admits Its Gold Is Gone: “There Is Almost No Gold Left In The Central Bank Vault”

Back in March, at a time when the IMF reported that Ukraine’s official gold holdings as of the end of February, so just as the State Department-facilitated coup against former president Victor Yanukovich was concluding, amounted to 42.3 tonnes or 8% of reserves…

… and notably under the previous “hated” president, Ukraine gold’s reserves had constantly increased hitting a record high just before the presidential coup…

 

… we reported of a strange incident that took place just after the Ukraine presidential coup, namely that according to at least one source, “in a mysterious operation under the cover of night, Ukraine’s gold reserves were promptly loaded onboard an unmarked plane, which subsequently took the gold to the US.” To wit:

Tonight, around at 2:00 am, an unregistered transport plane took off took off from Boryspil airport. According to Boryspil staff, prior to the plane’s appearance, four trucks and two cargo minibuses arrived at the airport all with their license plates missing. Fifteen people in black uniforms, masks and body armor stepped out, some armed with machine guns. These people loaded the plane with more than forty heavy boxes.

 

After this, several mysterious men arrived and also entered the plane. The loading was carried out in a hurry. After unloading, the plateless cars immediately left the runway, and the plane took off on an emergency basis.

 

Airport officials who saw this mysterious “special operation” immediately notified the administration of the airport, which however strongly advised them “not to meddle in other people’s business.”

 

Later, the editors were called by one of the senior officials of the former Ministry of Income and Fees, who reported that, according to him, tonight on the orders of one of the “new leaders” of Ukraine, all the gold reserves of the Ukraine were taken to the United States.

Needless to say there was no official confirmation of any of this taking place, and in fact our report, in which we mused if the “price of Ukraine’s liberation” was the handover of its gold to the Fed at a time when Germany was actively seeking to repatriate its own physical gold located at the bedrock of the NY Fed, led to the usual mainstream media mockery.

Until now.

In an interview on Ukraine TV, none other than the head of the Ukraine Central Bank made the stunning admission that “in the vaults of the central bank there is almost no gold left. There is a small amount of gold bullion left, but it’s just 1% of reserves.”

As Ukraina further reports, this stunning revelation means that not only has Ukraine been quietly depleting its gold throughout the year, but that the latest official number, according to which Ukraine gold was 8 times greater than the reported 1%, was fabricated, and that the real number is about 90% lower.

According to official statistics the NBU, the amount of gold in the vaults should be eight times more than is actually in stock. At the beginning of this month, the volume of gold was about $ 1 billion, or 8% of the total gold reserves. Now this is just one percent.

Of course, considering the official reserve data at the Central Bank has been clearly fabricated, one wonders just how long ago the actual gold “dmsplacement” took place.

We get some additional information from Rusila:

According to recent data, the value of Ukraine gold should be $988.7 million. That is the value of gold proportion of gold in gold reserves is 8%. If you believe Gontareva, it turns out there is a mere $123.6 million in gold remaining.

 

The figure is fantastic, considering that the amount of gold at the end of February (when the new authorities have already taken key positions) was $1.8 billion or 12% of the reserves.

 

In other words, since the beginning of the year gold reserves dropped almost 16 times. Gold stock in February were approximately 21 tons of gold, the presence of which was once proudly reported by Sergei Arbuzov, who led the NBU in 2010-2012. So what happened to 20.8 tons of gold?

 

Explaining the dramatic reduction in the context of the hryvnia devaluation through gold sales is impossible. After all, 92% of the reserves of the National Bank is in the form of a foreign currency that is much easier to use to maintain hryvnia levels and cover current liabilities. Besides since March the international price of gold has plummeted. Selling ??gold under such circumstances is a crime. In fact it would be more expedient to increase gold reserves through currency conversion in precious metals.

 

But apparently the result is not due to someone’s negligence or carelessness. The gold reserve has been actively carted out of the country, as a result of the very vague economic and political prospects of Ukraine. Something similar happened to the gold reserves of the USSR – when the Gorbachev elite realized that perestroika is leading the country to the abyss, gold simply disappeared in an unknown direction.

The article’s conclusion:

As history shows, the reduction of the gold reserves in the context of an acute political crisis is usually preceded by the collapse of the state.

Oddly enough there was no official gold reduction just prior to the time when Victoria “Fuck the EU” Nuland was planning Yanukovich’s ouster, and as shown above, quite the contrary. It is a little more odd that it was during the period when Ukraine was “supported” by its western allies that several billion dollars worth of physical gold – the people’s gold – just “vaporized.”

In any event, now that the disappearance of Ukraine’s gold has been confirmed, perhaps it is time to refresh the “unconfirmed” story that a little after the current Ukraine regime took power the bulk of Ukraine’s gold was taken to the United States.

As of this writing, The NY Fed has still not answered our March request for a comment whether Ukraine’s gold has been redomiciled at the gold vault located some 80 feet below Liberty 33.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vmfpgE Tyler Durden

Gold Rises After Unusual Russian Central Bank Gold Buying Announcement

Gold Rises After Unusual Russian Central Bank Gold Buying Announcement 

Russia’s central bank bought about 150 metric tons of the metal this year, announced Governor Elvira Nabiullina yesterday. The pronouncement immediately created buying in the market, prompting gold to rise to a two week high at $1,200 an ounce.

Head of Russian Central Bank Elvira Nabiullina -Jr/Bloomberg

Russia’s central bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina told the lower house of parliament about the significant Russian gold purchases. She is an economist, head of the Central Bank of Russia and was Vladimir Putin’s economic adviser between May 2012 to June 2013. 

This announcement is unusual and to our knowledge has not happened before. The announcement by the Russian central bank governor was likely coordinated with Putin and the Kremlin and designed to signal how Russia views their gold reserves as a potential geopolitical and indeed financial and currency war weapon.  

Gold currently constitutes for around 10% of the bank’s gold and forex reserves, she added. Official purchases were about 77 tons in 2013, International Monetary Fund data show.

 

MARKET UPDATE
Today’s AM fix was USD 1,200.75, EUR 957.61 and GBP 766.08 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,202.00, EUR 959.68 and GBP 767.81 per ounce.

Gold climbed $10.40 or 0.88% to $1,196.80/oz yesterday. Silver rose $0.06 or 0.37% to $16.22/oz.
Gold remained firm at $1,200 an ounce as the market digested very robust Russian central bank demand and announcement and await next week’s Swiss gold referendum and later today, the U.S. Federal Reserve minutes at 1900 GMT.

If the Fed increases interest rates it could hurt non-interest-bearing gold in the short term. However rising interesting rates are more bearish for stocks and bonds as was seen in the rising interest period of the 1970s when gold prices surged.

The Swiss gold referendum is around the corner on November 30th and if passed this could force the Swiss National Bank to keep 20% of its holdings in gold bullion, force the SNB to repatriate gold holdings and end all gold sales.

The dollar hit a seven-year high against the yen today. Silver was up 0.5%  at $16.24 an ounce. Spot platinum was up 0.5% at $1,206.65 an ounce, while spot palladium was flat at $769.98 an ounce. 

Shares fell in Europe and Asia on Wednesday while the dollar rose broadly, hitting a new seven-year high against the yen, as investor nervousness on the diverging outlooks for the world’s major economies.

The dip in gold prices has spurred purchases from Asia. Trading volumes on the Shanghai Gold Exchange’s (SGE) benchmark bullion spot contract jumped this week and India’s imports surged in October. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a gold bar while visiting an exhibition at Russia’s Far Eastern gold mining center of Magadan November 22, 2005. Putin on Tuesday supported the idea of boosting the share of gold in Russia’s central bank reserves, which are the largest of any country outside Asia. (Photo: REUTERS/ITAR-TASS/PRESIDENTIAL/)

The International Monetary Fund said the latest figures showed an almost double jump over the country’s registered purchases of 77 tonnes in 2013. It said that historically, Russia started buying gold again since the end of September, perhaps at an initial 35 tonnes.

Nabiullina, who said the bank’s total foreign reserves is made up 10 percent of gold, likewise told the Russian parliament on Tuesday there is no need to place restrictions on gold exports. A number of lawmakers had proposed to put a moratorium on the exports of the safe haven yellow metal so the country would be able to secure enough gold amid the sanctions it is experiencing.

Buy Gold Bars in the Safest Way and at the Lowest Prices

Get Breaking News and Updates on the Gold Market Here




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1wYIycq GoldCore

The Broken Market’s Latest Creation: An Algo To Offset The Impact Of Other Algos

Define paradox: in a world in which market liquidity has become non-existent due to the pervasive presence of algos in every product, from stocks, to FX, to commodities and now to Treasurys (as the Oct 15 Treasury crash showed) who do nothing but churn all day long to collect liquidity rebates and just wait to front-run and subpenny whale orders, and yet the second a major sell order appears they all scurry as the “machines are all turned off” and we get a flash crash, what is one to do? Why put all their faith in an algo of course.

Define paradox #2: just whose algo is supposed to provide you will the much needed liquidity? Why that of the firm which blew up because its trading wires got crossed and on August 1, 2012 inverted bid and ask, promptly pushing itself into insolvency as its own “liquidity” evaporated in minutes and ended up being bought for pennies on the dollar by the like of Jefferies and Citadel. The firm, of course, is Knight Capital, or as it is now known, KCG.

And because two paradoxes make an unparadox or something, Trader’s Magazine reports that “as part of KCG’s continued push into the institutional trading side of the business”… which is a euphemism for please trade with us: we won’t blow up again, we promise… “the well-regarded and historically focused market-maker [ZH: if you keep repeating that it magically comes true, just ask world-renowned trader Dennis Gartman] has built its first brand new algorithmic trading tool – Catch.”

What does the algo known as Catch do? Well, supposedly it offsets the impact of all other algos who have crushed market liquidity. Translation: this is a “good” algo.

The firm has developed Catch – an algorithm designed to find what Susi and KCG term “higher quality” liquidity. Higher quality liquidity, he noted, could be defined as order flow that reflects little to no market impact after and execution – no market movement, reversion or footprint. Thus, Catch is meant for buysiders who are quietly searching for that elusive block trade and/or natural fill – not the small predatory orders or high-frequency traders who look to sniff out institutions larger orders and get out in front of them.

“Elusive” being the key word of course. And we won’t even comment on the irony of an algo admitting its sole purpose is to offset what createors of every other parasitic, predatory algos deny exists: HFTs which “sniff out institutions of larger orders and get out in front of them.” Maybe there is another irony somewhere that offsets this one. Just like the paradoxes.

So, how does the algorithm work?

In simple terms, Catch casts a wider net for an order, leveraging a broader set of tools when chasing liquidity. Utilizing thoughtful, passive order placement logic and an advanced fair value model, Catch is empowered by KCG’s Big Data analytics and low-latency routing technology.

 

Catch is guided, but not governed, by a market-aware participation strategy that uses adaptive participation guidelines. This strategy influences the urgency of trading, but will not force trading at inopportune times, as can be the case with algorithms coded with hard bands.

 

Susi explained that the algo is designed to act aggressive early on. That is, volume participation will be greater at the beginning of the order, getting a user closer to the fill sooner. As the algo runs, it continuously recalibrates. Catch manages opportunistic passive and aggressive trading by considering urgency, inventory, and market conditions in real-time. Therefore, its participation is continually recalibrated as an order progresses to ensure proper exposure and optimal execution performance.

 

He added that Catch is rooted in the firm’s market making technology, market latency experience and now big data technology. The result is an algorithm which helps the buyside find alpha at all levels – especially incremental or “micro” alpha at the child order level.

 

Uh, Knight Capital – which again blew up due to its market making going horribly wrong – pitching something as being rooted in the firm’s “market making technology, market latency experience” is probably not the best approach.

The said, we can’t help but note the biggest irony of all: first of all HFTs destroy market liquidity, and now they “sell” products meant to circumvent the zero liquidity they themselves have created. Does that qualify for a market monopoly yet?

In conclusion, however, we are very much relieved to note that when even HFTs begin offering products that seek to offset the impact of other HFTs, than the market structure wars are finally coming to an end as the cannibalization among the parasites has reached the endgame.

Now if only central banks could follow suit.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1qsk66F Tyler Durden

The US is losing 9.5 acres of farmland per minute

Agriculture field The US is losing 9.5 acres of farmland per minute

November 19, 2014
Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

More than six thousand years ago, the most advanced civilization on planet was Sumer, rulers of the fertile plains of ancient Mesopotamia in modern day Iraq.

The Sumerians weren’t powerful from their military strength or political system; rather, it was agriculture that developed their civilization.

Quite simply, the ancient Sumerians had developed techniques to produce far more agriculture than they could possibly consume.

This food surplus meant that they could build up a large pool of savings to be used in trade, or to feed workers who could pursue other careers like science and architecture.

Nearly every great civilization ever since has shared the same characteristics– being able to produce more than it consumes.

In fact, no society can survive without the ability to feed itself. We’ve seen this throughout history.

When the Sumerians’ complex , centrally-planned network of canals failed to adequately irrigate their farmland, the civilization quickly declined.

The Roman Empire was notorious for routinely invading other lands looking to secure additional sources of food.

During the American Civil War, a large part of the Union’s strategy was to cut off the South from its food sources, and burn to the ground every acre of farmland they could find.

And despite decades of economic hardship, the French Revolution finally kicked off in 1789 because the nation could no longer feed itself… and people were starving.

Early on in US history, the country’s strength came from this same ability to produce more than it consumed.

And over the centuries the US became farmer to the world, exporting interminable quantities of food like a never-ended breadbasket.

But that trend peaked long ago.

Over the past five years, for example, the amount of farmland in the US has decreased by 5 million acres each year, often due to land development or aging farmers quitting the business.

This is equivalent to losing nearly one square mile of farmland every hour, or 9.5 acres per minute.

The same trend is taking place in China, where more than 40% of the country’s arable land has been lost in recent years due to development, drought, and topsoil erosion.

Yet while we’re seeing a dramatic decline in the amount of farmland available per person in the world’s largest powers, demand is rapidly increasing.

I’m not just talking about population growth, which is a given. There’s also the growth in demand that comes with economic development.

As a nation’s wealth increases, so does its demand for food.

The billion people across Asia being lifted out of poverty into the middle class are consuming more Calories than ever before, and consuming meat for the first time ever.

Raising animals for meat production requires far more land per Calorie than growing fruits, vegetables, and grains.

So not only are people consuming more Calories, but they’re also requiring more land per Calorie.

This is a clearly unsustainable trend: the world needs more farmland per capita to meet food production needs at a time when the amount of farmland is in decline.

On top of all this are the water challenges that many parts of the world are experiencing. California is a great example.

It’s well known that the entire state of California is experiencing EXTREME drought conditions.

What’s less known is that, along with many other crops, California is the world’s top almond producer.

The state produces 80% of the global almond supply, completely dwarfing production in the rest of the world combined.

Yet at the same time, California almond growers consume nearly 10% of the state’s water supply.

Think about it– when you export agriculture, you are also exporting all the resources and inputs that go into producing that agriculture.

So at a time when the entire state is suffering from extreme drought, California almond farmers are essentially exporting 10% of the state’s dwindling water supply.

This math doesn’t add up. And it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that, at a minimum, the price of almonds is due to rise dramatically in the coming years.

Almonds are just one example. We can see this across the board with food in general.

For most crops, yields peaked long ago; in other words, human beings are already extracting the maximum amount of tons, kilos, bushels, etc. per acre.

And thanks to absurd government and monetary policy, we’re simultaneously seeing rising production costs, as well as idiotic incentives to turn food into inefficient fuel. Or subsidies which pay farmers to not grow at all.

These trends are all converging at the same time, suggesting a long-term rise in food prices, and in some cases even shortages.

This isn’t some sensational, headline-grabbing nonsense. It’s simple arithmetic based on objective, publicly available data.

And it’s a trend that will affect nearly everyone on the planet.

On a small scale, you can do well for yourself by planting a small garden with some fruit and nut trees in your own backyard. Worst case you enhance your property value and have a small supply of organic food.

On a larger scale, owning productive farmland and selling food across the value chain may turn out to be one of the best investments of the decade.

But with farmland prices at all-time highs in the US, and water availability highly questionable, the real opportunities lie overseas. More on that tomorrow.

PS. You might also be interested in our latest post on how to protect yourself from Civil Asset Forfeiture.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/11CwhTe
via IFTTT

Civil Asset Forfeiture: What you can do about it

Civil Asset Forfeiture Civil Asset Forfeiture: What you can do about it

November 19, 2014
Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

Tan Nguyen was stopped on the highway for driving three miles over the speed limit. The policeman searched the car and found a briefcase of money that Tan said he just won at a casino.

There weren’t any drugs to be found, but suddenly the cop said he smelled marijuana and confiscated the money.

Now, if you or I were to have taken Tan’s money at the point of a gun, it would be called armed robbery, and we’d go to jail.

But when the state does it, it’s called Civil Asset Forfeiture. And it’s perfectly legal.

What’s more, they’re able to commit this highway robbery without a shred of proof or evidence. And then it’s up to the victims to prove their innocence to get the money back.

It’s not surprising that the system is being abused. It’s such easy money.

And what do these police departments do with the money that they steal? Whatever they want, as it turns out.

Police departments in the Land of the Free have used seized funds for things like a margarita machine, a Zamboni (that thing that cleans the ice on a rink), hiring a clown, or a trip to Hawaii.

And as infuriating as these examples all are, often overlooked are the more sinister examples of what these funds have been used for.

Take the $227,390 used to purchase an 8-ton Ballistic Engineered Armored Response Counter Attack Truck (yes, that spells BEARCAT).

Or the $54,000 spent on twenty-seven military grade M-4 assault rifles. (Both by of these were in Georgia).

Between $382,000 on license-plate readers, $208,000 on electronic surveillance tools, and an undisclosed amount on a “cell site simulator” that can surreptitiously track cellphones—you can see that the stolen money is being used to get better at cracking down on your liberties even further.

The institution that claims to be there to protect is now among the biggest threats to liberty.

Think about it– you have a far greater chance of having your assets wrongfully seized than being the victim of some terrorist attack.

What can you do about it? First off– don’t drive around with a lot of cash. And definitely don’t try to leave the country with a lot of cash.

Leaving the country with more than $10,000 requires making a report with the federal government’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), as if it’s some sort of crime to move cash overseas.

Bottom line, if you want to move a lot of wealth, there are better options.

For smaller amounts under $25,000, a few gold coins in your briefcase are a lot less conspicuous than bricks of cash.

If you have trustworthy sources (premium members- see our previous alerts about this), you can buy rare coins and collectibles that are worth much more.

For example, a single five cent buffalo nickel in excellent condition can be worth half a million dollars or more. This is something that you could stick in your pocket and walk out of the country, and no one would ever know.

Digital currency is another option. Through cold storage and paper wallets, millions of dollars worth of digital currency can be held in a simple, random string of characters.

Civil asset forfeiture is clearly a growing problem. But all of the tools and technology already exist to take back your freedom and make sure you don’t become another statistic.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/11u2FXd
via IFTTT

John Stossel on Government Control Freaks

Rule-makers always want more. At
first, they just asked for bans on TV’s cigarette ads. Then they
demanded no-smoking sections in restaurants. Then bans in
airplanes, schools, workplaces, entire restaurants. Then bars, too.
Now sometimes even apartments and outdoor spaces. Can’t smokers
have some places?, John Stossel asks. 

So far, smokers just … take it. But maybe that’s changing. The
town of Westminster, Massachusetts, recently held hearings on
whether to ban the sale of tobacco products altogether, and 500
angry people showed up. One said, “I find smoking one of the most
disgusting habits anybody could possibly do. On top of that, I find
this proposal to be even more of a disgusting thing.” Good for
him.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vpHRht
via IFTTT

It’s Not a Typo: Michael Cannon on Obamacare’s Exchange Subsidy Provision

When
Obamacare goes back to the Supreme Court next year, the nine
justices on the court will be hearing a case built in large part by
Cato Institute Health Policy Director Michael
Cannon.

For the last three years, Cannon has been working on a
challenge, not to Obamacare, but to the way it has been implemented
by the Obama administration, which has allowed insurance subsidies
to be offered through exchanges run by the federal government
despite clear legislative language saying that those subsidies are
meant only for state-established exchanges. Cannon’s 2012 paper on
the IRS rule authorizing subsidies in federal exchanges, co-written
with Case Western Reserve Law Professor Jonathan Adler, is the
foundation of the legal argument the court will be
hearing. 

Sarah Kliff of Vox.com
interviewed
Cannon about the challenge. It’s worth reading in
full, but I want to highlight two sections in
full. 

In the first, Cannon explains why the section of the law in
question is not just a minor typo, as several
not-very-well-informed commenters have suggested:

Sarah Kliff: You and Adler initially thought that this was
a glitch or a typo, that it was a drafting error where legislators
were sloppy and forgot a word. But you’ve since become convinced
that it was the intention of Congress to withhold subsidies from
states that don’t build exchanges. How did your viewpoint change on
that?

Michael Cannon: We first thought that it was a mistake,
that it was a drafting error. And it is still a glitch in the sense
that it’s a snag or something that complicates implementation. The
reason I didn’t initially think they wrote it this way was it would
give states a lot of power to block the law.

But we started doing a lot of research into this, the most
research that I think anyone has done. And if you look at the
tax-credit eligibility rules, they are very tightly worded. It’s
not in one place, but in two places, it says that the credits are
only available “through an Exchange established by the State.” Then
there are seven different cross-references to that language. They
never mentioned any other type of exchange. They never mentioned
exchanges generally. It’s all very tightly worded to refer only to
exchanges “established by the State.”

Then if you look at the legislative history, you’ll find that
that was the language in the Finance Committee’s bill and when it
passed the Finance Committee. But that bill only had one of those
explicit “Exchanges established by the State” phrases. They added
the other one in Harry Reid’s office while it was being merged with
the HELP bill under the direction of the Senate leadership and
White House staff — Peter Orszag and Valerie Jarrett and Nancy-Ann
DeParle, and everyone else who was going in and out of that room.
So this restriction was added to the statute in multiple places at
multiple points in the drafting process.

The history and the repetition make it hard to argue that the
language was just a fat-finger oopsy. I would also add
that the law doesn’t just say that subsidies are allowed in
exchanges “established by the State.” It also explicitly defines
“State” as being one of the fifty states or the District of
Columbia (conspicuously leaving out the federal government), and it
also extends that phrase to say “established by the State under
[Section] 1311 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
It refers to this section twice. Section 1311, notably, is the
section that deals with state-run exchanges. There’s a whole
different section—1321—for federal exchanges, and that section
isn’t mentioned.

This was no mere typo, no careless wording error. It is how the
law was purposefully and intentionally written. And this is the
language that Congress voted to pass. 

In the interview, Cannon also addresses the question of whether
he’s to “blame” if the Supreme Court agrees with the challengers
that the subsidies in the federal exchanges are illegal:

Sarah Kliff: What do you think of the people who put the
blame on you? There are people who are going to say, if your case
wins, “Why did you guys take away health coverage from millions of
people?”

Michael Cannon: The first thing I’d say in response is, “If
those subsidies are illegal, would you favor or oppose ending
them?” So far, no one has said they would favor allowing the
president to subsidize people illegally.

Then the question becomes, “Are they legal or are they not?”
That’s what we’ve been debating all this time. I’m convinced that
they’re illegal.

Then I ask, “If you were convinced the president was doing
something illegal, what would you do?” Well, this is what I would
do. This is what I’m doing. Any dislocation, any disruption, any
harm that is caused by those people losing those subsidies, the
responsibility for that falls at the feet of the president
himself.

The question that matters here is whether or not the law is
being implemented in a way that is legal under the statute. If the
administration’s implementation is illegal, then it needs to be
stopped.  

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qX5dUz
via IFTTT

New International Gang Of Thieves Make Somali Pirates Look Like Amateurs

Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

When the two young petty thieves, Rinconete and Cortadillo, came to Seville they were quickly censured for stealing.

 

To their surprise, it wasn’t for the theft itself, but instead because they were not registered with the local thieves’ guild.

 

In this upside-down world imagined by Miguel Cervantes, theft was not a crime, but a craft—performed in the name of God and justice.

 

And like any other craftsmen of the day, the thieves had formed a guild. There they provided training and support to their members, while maintaining an exclusive right to engage in the trade.

This past month, a real-life guild of thieves was formed. With 51 governments pledging their support to each other for the protection of their ignoble craft of theft. And another 30 pledging to join by 2018.

From day one, governments have been pilfering their citizens’ assets through taxation, claiming a monopoly on thievery.

From the largest institution to the pettiest pickpocket, anyone else who tries to engage in theft is severely punished, as governments work to protect their exclusive right to steal.

Frighteningly, they do this all out in the open, believing that they actually have a moral right to commit theft.

You can see this delusion in the US government’s claims that last year they “lost out” on $337 billion from people avoiding taxes. As if they have some moral claim to the money they’d failed to pilfer.

Nonetheless, they use this claim to justify actively hunting down and penalizing anyone who takes action to avoid being stolen from.

The ones that are doing this are the bankrupt countries, and the deeper they slide into debt, the more desperate they become.

Which is why these broke governments are now joining forces, pledging to to collect and share information amongst themselves about citizens’ bank accounts, taxes, assets and income outside local tax jurisdictions.

Basically—I’ll help you steal from your citizens if you help me steal from mine.

Both the punishment and the likelihood of getting caught for tax evasion are growing. Don’t even bother trying.

However that doesn’t mean that you have no choice but to sit there and let your self be stolen from.

While there are still ways of legally reducing your tax burden from within a country, your best option is to move and diversify.

Diversification is key, because if you have all your eggs in one bankrupt basket, you are really taking on extraordinary risk.

Moving some assets abroad can legitimately reduce some of this risk. And an even greater strategy is considering moving yourself.

Citizens of most countries have the benefit of divorcing themselves from the tax system simply by moving abroad.

It’s a bit more onerous for US citizens. But for Americans living abroad, it’s still possible to earn roughly $100,000 without paying income tax.

In fact, between the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, Foreign Housing Exclusion, SEP IRA contributions, and more, an American couple can sock away roughly $300,000 per year while paying almost zero income tax.

And if you become a resident of Puerto Rico (which any American can do), it’s possibly to completely eliminate US federal income tax on any amount of money.

By doing so, not only are you taking yourself out of the reach of this gang of thieves, but you are also casting a vote with your feet.

More important than the ballot box, this is a vote that actually counts. And one you have complete control over.

(Don’t worry– if you can’t move, there are still plenty of options to reduce your tax burden and take back your freedom. More on this in upcoming letters.)

*  *  *

Our goal is simple: To help you achieve personal liberty and financial prosperity no matter what happens.

If you liked this post, please click the box below. You can watch a compelling video you'll find very interesting.

Will you be prepared when everything we take for granted changes overnight?

Just think about this for a couple of minutes. What if the U.S. Dollar wasn't the world's reserve currency? Ponder that… what if…

Empires Rise, they peak, they decline, they collapse, this is the cycle of history.

This historical pattern has formed and is already underway in many parts of the world, including the United States.

Don't be one of the millions of people who gets their savings, retirement, and investments wiped out.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vpF9sw Tyler Durden

The Next Round of the Great Crisis is Just Around the Corner

The financial system is lurching towards the next round of the Great Crisis that began in 2007.

 

The 2007-2008 phase occurred when investment banks flooded the financial system with toxic derivatives. All told the derivatives market was over $1 QUADRILLION (that’s 1,000 TRILLIONS) in notional value when the crisis hit.

The Central Banks, knowing that the very banks they are meant to govern, were insolvent, began a series of emergency measures to deal with this. In the simplest form, they moved the banks’ garbage debts onto the public’s (read sovereign nations’) balance sheets.

 

The banks, knowing that they were given a green light, have since begun leveraging up again. Today, the financial system’s leverage is in fact even greater than it was in 2007.

 

Moreover, this time around, entire countries are on the verge of being bankrupt.

 

Consider Japan.

 

Japan is the third largest economy in the world. And the Bank of Japan is buying ALL of its debt issuance. This is precisely what triggered Germany’s Weimar Hyperinflation. The Japanese Bond market has become in the words of a financial insider “a giant Ponzi scheme”

 

We all know how Ponzi schemes end. They implode. Japan is on the verge of this.

 

In Europe, we already know the economy is in tatters. Italy is back in recession for the third time since 2008. Germany’s economy contracted in the second quarter of 2014 and will likely be in recession before the first quarter of 2015. France has registered zero growth for six months now.

 

Things are heating up on the political front as well. Separatist movements are rapidly growing in Spain, Italy, Belgium, and even France. Small wonder when even the individual Central Banks for the EU are fed up with the European Central Bank and its policies.

 

Then there is the US.

 

While the US in no better shape than Japan or Europe, the fact remains that our economy is almost flat-lining. The “official” data claims we’re in good shape as far as unemployment, but we all know that the “official” data is a work of fiction.

 

 Moreover, we’re now sitting on the biggest stock market bubble of all time. By some measures, stocks are MORE overvalued today than they were in 2000. Small wonder than corporate insiders (the folks who know more about their companies’ growth prospects than anyone) are dumping shares at a pace not seen since the peak of the Tech Bubble.

 

On top of this:

 

1.     Corporate debt is back to 2007 PEAK levels.

2.     Stock buybacks are back to 2007 PEAK levels.

3.     Investor bullishness is back to 2007 PEAK levels.

4.     Margin debt (money borrowed to buy stocks) is at 2007 PEAK levels.

5.     Numerous investment legends have warned of a coming crash.

6.     Investor complacency is at a record LOW.

 

Between the US, Europe, and Japan, you’ve got over 50% of the world’s GDP in recession or approaching it. And this is happening at a time when the financial system is in an epic bubble.

 

Buckle up, it’s coming.

 

If you’ve yet to take action to prepare for the second round of the financial crisis, we offer a FREE investment report Financial Crisis "Round Two" Survival Guide that outlines easy, simple to follow strategies you can use to not only protect your portfolio from a market downturn, but actually produce profits.

 

You can pick up a FREE copy at:

http://ift.tt/1rPiWR3

 

Best Regards

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tf8fDn Phoenix Capital Research

Go Tell Your Meddling City Council: ‘Vape’ Is Word of the Year

Oxford Dictionary has declared “vape”—the verb used to describe
smoking electronic cigarettes—as
its word of the year
. It added the word to its dictionary in
August and charted a spike in the use of the term over the spring
as it became a hot-button issue in cities:

Usage of vape
peaked in April 2014 – as the graph below indicates – around the
time that the UK’s first ‘vape café’ (The Vape Lab in Shoreditch,
London) opened its doors, and protests were held in response to New
York City banning indoor vaping. In the same month, the issue of
vaping was debated by The Washington Post, the BBC, and the British newspaper The Telegraph, amongst others.

It could have been "bae" [shudder]

The word beat out “normcore” and “slacktivism,” so we should all
be grateful at the dodged bullts there. Reason should get part of
the credit, yes? Reason writers have been beating the drum
throughout 2014 (and earlier) about how local governments are
overreacting to the rise of e-cigarettes, attempting to treat them
exactly the same as traditional cigarettes even though the harms
(especially to bystanders) are not the same and that it could serve
as a useful tool to help people quit smoking traditional tobacco.
Reason hosted one of those aforementioned protest events in New
York City. Here’s some recent Reason pieces:


“Smoking by Teenagers Continues to Fall As Vaping Continues to
Rise”


“If It Tastes Good to Kids, Ban It”


“Study: E-Cigarettes Offer Far More Benefits Than Harms to Smokers
and Bystanders”


“Jay Rockefeller’s Vaping Vapors”

And many more pieces here.

And below from Reason TV, New Yorkers fight the city’s ban on
e-cigarettes in public places and bars:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1uJw4so
via IFTTT