Nick Gillespie, Bernard Kerik Debate ISIS on CNN's Smerconish

Yesterday, I appeared on CNN’s Smerconish to talk
about ISIS, whether the group represents a threat to the United
States, and whether we should be re-entering Iraq (and entering
Syria) to combat it.

Joining me and the eponymous host was Bernard Kerik, former
commissioner of the NYPD and a nominee to head up the Department of
Homeland Security. (Reason TV interviewed Kerik recently on
sentencing reform, terrorism, and more.
Watch and read that here.
)

Click above to watch and go here for more Smerconish
(an excellent show, by the way, that focuses and conversation
rather than barking, as so many cable yak shows do).

My basic case against fighting ISIS is laid
out here
. And I discussed the large issue of “threat inflation”
in
this Daily Beast column
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1sQ4Afn
via IFTTT

Sheldon Richman on the Anti-Militarist Libertarian Heritage

Herbert SpencerWith
the United States on the verge of another war in the Middle East
libertarians need to reacquaint themselves with thier intellectual
heritage of peace, antimilitarism, and anti-imperialism. This rich
heritage is too often overlooked and frequently not appreciated at
all. That is tragic. Libertarianism, to say the least, is deeply
skeptical of state power. Of course, then, it follows that
libertarianism must be skeptical of the state’s power to make war —
to kill and destroy in other lands. Along with its domestic
police authority, this is the state’s most dangerous power.
Herbert Spencer, the great English libertarian philosopher of the
late 19th and early 20th century, writes Sheldon Richman,
eloquently expressed radical liberalism’s antipathy to war and
militarism. His writings are full of warnings about the dangers of
war and conquest. 

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1urLrT4
via IFTTT

The Big Picture For Gold And Silver

With precious metals back at 4-year lows against a backdrop of gold migration from west to east, paper vs physical divergences, ‘disappearing’ Comex positions, dark pools in London, collateral grabs, and massive monetary policy extremist actions; we thought the following two presentations worth considering. Tocqueville’s John Hathaway delves into the darker corners of today’s gold markets while Mike Maloney reminds us of the big picture behind gold and silver as wealth insurance. The failure of a monetary system is never a smooth road – it is rocky and undulating, with twists and turns that don’t appear on any map. But the destination is always without question, despite suppression efforts: Gold will inevitably respond to an expanding fiat currency supply. That simple.

 

Tocqueville’s John Hathaway asks (and answers) “Do You Know Where YOUR Gold Is” as he explains how counterparty and systemic risk will converge and the various dark and murky corners of the precious metals markets in which manipulation grows unchecked…

 

John Hathaway Tocqueville Keynote

 

*  *  *

And Mike Maloney explains the big picture for gold and silver in the clip below

 

*  *  *

Simply put,

We are living through unprecedented times, and if there is one lesson to keep in mind it is this: The failure of a monetary system is never a smooth road paved with gold. It is rocky and undulating, with twists and turns that don’t appear on any map.

 

But the destination is always without question: Gold inevitably responds to an expanding fiat currency supply. That simple.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rcmnkg Tyler Durden

Russia FinMin Calls For Shift Away From US Treasurys Into BRIC Bonds, Settlement In Non-Dollar Currencies

It is no secret that Russia has had enough of the Petrodollar, and in light of ongoing western sanctions – which many view not so much as a reaction to events in Ukraine bur merely as an attempt to halt the Russian revolution against the Petrodollar status quo, crushing its economy before the momentum grows and more countries join Moscow – is constantly thinking of ways it can ditch the dollar as a medium of exchange as fast as possible. The problem is that when it comes to retaliating against the West, Russia – short of declaring an embargo on USD payments for its commodities – has little control over what currency its western trading partners will pay in. So instead it is focusing on its net exporting peers, aka the BRICS, with whom as previously reported, Russia had launched a “bank” alternative to the IMF when it comes to backstop and bailout funding, one that avoids reliance on the SDR, the USD, and on Western empathy.

It is the same BRICs that, Russia’s Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, told Rossiya TV in an interview earlier today, should conduct transactions in national currencies, bypassing cross-rates with the US Dollar, adding that “we can easily make mutual settlements directly,” and the mechanism should be beneficial to both sides of transactions.

And if it wasn’t clear by now, Russia pivot away from the west and toward China is pretty much complete. Medvedev also said that “our collaboration with China is of strategic importance. We have great, brilliant political contacts, we have excellent economic relations. [China] is our strategic partner, and we are interested in expanding the volume of cooperation. We are not afraid of collaborating because we are confident that this is equal, friendly and mutually beneficial collaboration in all areas.”

Meanwhile, regarding escalating Western tensions, the PM said that sanctions have created a bad situation for Russian banks on financial markets, all sources of liquidity are frozen. “We regard this as a senseless and ugly decision toward Russia, but we’ll manage without it.” So does that mean that China will step in to provide the required FX reserves as Russia minimizes its USD exposure? Perhaps, but not entirely: Medvedev did add that “Asia, other markets “unlikely fully” to compensate for frozen European financing.”

The PM also said that Russia passed through similar squeeze in 2008-2009 and can manage with central bank resources, adding that Europe is still important market for Russia, if EU members “make no absurd decisions to squeeze us out of this market, we’ll stay there, it’s interesting for us.”

But while Medvedev was the good cop today, it was Russia’s finance minister Anton Siluanov who was the designated “bad guy”, and as the WSJ reported, Russia is considering diversifying its debt portfolio away from countries that have imposed sanctions on Moscow and into the papers of its BRICS partners.

Speaking on the sidelines of an annual investment forum in the Black Sea town of Sochi, Mr. Siluanov said the Finance Ministry wants to diversify its investment basket, and is looking for higher yields without too much risks. He said the ministry will consider buying papers issued by Brazil, India, China and South Africa, which along with Russia are known collectively as the Brics countries.

 

“[We would like to] walk away from investing in papers of the countries that impose sanctions against us,” Mr. Siluanov said, adding that the reshuffle would be carried out gradually. He didn’t elaborate on when the first purchases of Brics debt may take place.

The good news for the US, now that Russia appears set on either rapidly or slowly selling off its US Treasury exposure, is that Kremlin has possession of only $115 billion in US paper, which happens to be more than the $100 billion it reported in May when the first shock of a Russian bond sell off hit the market.

But at the end of the day it is not what Russia does, but what its other BRIC peers and US Treasury holders do. Because while Moscow may be in possession of just over $114.5 billion in US paper, China, Brazil and India share among them some $1.6 trillion in US Treasurys, better known as “leverage” in every sense of the word, or an amount that not even the Fed could monetize on short notice without sending a massive shockwave through the global capital markets.

In other words, while the US pushes Russia hard, it may be careful not to push it too hard, and in the process start an avalanche that leads to a BRIC bond avalanche, which may well be one possible endgame as the world is forced to transition from the US Dollar as a reserve currency in the coming years.

Never gonna happen?

Considering that none other than Obama’s own former chief economic advisor, Jared Bernstein, is advocating dropping the USD as the global reserve currency, we would be careful with using the word “never” in this specific case…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tIRDIz Tyler Durden

The Decline Of America's Economic Model In 1 Simple Chart

"You can't eat GDP, and you can't live in a rising stock market" is the striking phrase from NY Times' Neil Irwin as he offers the most damning chart of the decline of America's Economic Model (and dream). As we have explained vociferously, the most important thing to understand about today’s economy is: Around 1999, growth in the United States economy stopped translating to growth in middle-class incomes.

 

The choice, by Greenspan and carried on by his followers, was to enable the financialization of the US economy for the benefit of the few, at the cost of the many. As Irwin concludes, and we explained previously, Americans feel disappointed by the economy; the new data show that they have good reason.

Source: NY Times

*  *  *

Perhaps, just perhaps, Rick Santelli was right after all

"This is America! We don't follow consensus, we set it!"

This is what Santelli is upset about… Who is the Fed working for? Main Street or Wall Street?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/Z3gT11 Tyler Durden

The Decline Of America’s Economic Model In 1 Simple Chart

"You can't eat GDP, and you can't live in a rising stock market" is the striking phrase from NY Times' Neil Irwin as he offers the most damning chart of the decline of America's Economic Model (and dream). As we have explained vociferously, the most important thing to understand about today’s economy is: Around 1999, growth in the United States economy stopped translating to growth in middle-class incomes.

 

The choice, by Greenspan and carried on by his followers, was to enable the financialization of the US economy for the benefit of the few, at the cost of the many. As Irwin concludes, and we explained previously, Americans feel disappointed by the economy; the new data show that they have good reason.

Source: NY Times

*  *  *

Perhaps, just perhaps, Rick Santelli was right after all

"This is America! We don't follow consensus, we set it!"

This is what Santelli is upset about… Who is the Fed working for? Main Street or Wall Street?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/Z3gT11 Tyler Durden

Greenspan’s “Irrational Exuberance” Warning In Context

As the marginal investing bot continues to invest his marginal leveraged dollar-on-the-sideline on an equity market that, as Janet Yellen has explained to the poor, will create a "wealth effect" to sustain everyone through rainy days and retirement, we thought some context worthwhile. On December 5th 1996, Alan Greenspan – upon the recognition that equity market capitalization has bubbled to over 100% of nominal GDP – opined that investors had succumbed to "irrational exuberance." Since then, that 'exuberance' has become increasingly rational as the Fed pulls all its monetary-base expanding, deficit-funding, asset-purchases to keep the American Dream alive for a select (and shrinking) few

 

Irational-er and Irrational-er…

 

But adjusted for the reality of a fiat world, things look a little different since the dot-com collapse inspired The Fed…

 

As is clear – since the financial crisis, stocks have become completely dependent upon The Fed

 

As The Monetary stock and flow indicate…

 

And relative to debt… stocks have gone nowherefor 90 years…

Charts: The Chart Store

*  *  *

"Clearly, sustained low inflation implies less uncertainty about the future, and lower risk premiums imply higher prices of stocks and other earning assets. We can see that in the inverse relationship exhibited by price/earnings ratios and the rate of inflation in the past. But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions as they have in Japan over the past decade…"

"How" indeed, Alan, how indeed?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1wARk21 Tyler Durden