Regulators Watch Porn and Literally Sleep with Industry They’re Supposed to Rein In … Instead of Protecting the Public

The Washington Times reported yesterday that Nuclear Regulatory Commission workers watch porn instead of cracking down on unsafe conditions at nuclear plants.

That’s not an isolated problem …

We noted last year:

Investigators from the Treasury’s Office of the Inspector General found that some of the regulator’s employees surfed erotic websites, hired prostitutes and accepted gifts from bank executives … instead of actually working to help the economy.

 

Likewise, senior SEC employees spent up to 8 hours a day surfing porn sites instead of cracking down on financial crimes.

 

The Minerals Management Service – the regulator charged with overseeing BP and other oil companies to ensure that oil spills don’t occur – was riddled with “a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity”, which included “sex with industry contacts.

The biggest companies own the D.C. politicians.  Indeed, the head of the economics department at George Mason University has pointed out that it is unfair to call politicians “prostitutes”.  They are in fact pimps … selling out the American people for a price.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/GqVXyT-uJBU/story01.htm George Washington

Which Is It? According To The BLS, The Average Monthly Job Gain In 2013 Is Either 184K Or 20% Lower

Back in September in “This Is What Happens When The Bureau Of Labor Statistics Is Caught In A Lie” (a topic that has gained substantial prominence recently), we concluded our series exposing BLS data “massaging”, when as we predicted the monthly JOLTS survey, which had been trending at an implied monthly job gain of 140K and diverging massively from the NFP average of 198K, as can be seen on the chart below…

 

… finally caught up with reality, resulting in the single biggest monthly outlier in the data stream in the history of the survey.

To be sure, we explicitly warned ahead of time that a massive data revision was imminent as never before had two congruent series diverged so spectacularly. Specifically we said “This means that either the JOLTS survey is substantially under-representing the net turnover of workers, or that once the part-time frenzy in the NFP data normalizes, the monthly job gains will plunge to just over 100K per month to “normalize” for what has been a very peculiar upward “drift” in the NFP “data.”

Even Bill Gross read our prior post on the topic from August and tweeted his personal observations:

Of course, now that this record outlier is in the history books, it is in the BLS’ interest to slowly but surely “massage” it out with historical revisions. And following today’s just released most recent JOLTS report, the BLS has started to make sure that its own two key job datasets no longer diverge so much as to make a completely mockery of its “data” collection and analysis. This is shown in the chart below.

We are confident that with every passing month, silent revisionist history will allow the BLS to smooth out all the prior “data” until the July “sore thumb” outlier is perfectly subsumed in the trailing average. Which is why will keep the original data as long as needed to keep reminding the BLS that someone keeps watch.

But while the above is indicative of BLS data manipulation, both concurrent and historic, a bigger issue is that even with the adjusted data, there is still a rather notable problem when it comes to reports of the US employment.

The reason is that as we have been explaining for the greater part of 2013, the data sets showing NFP job gains and the Net turnover from JOLTS (hires less separations) has to by definition match. And for the most part it has as can be seen in the chart from the start of 2011:

What is not evident on the chart above is what happens when one zooms in only on the data in 2013, and specifically what the average monthly job gain is per the BLS’ nonfarm payrolls report on one hand – perhaps the most watched number in history now that the Fed’s tapering and perhaps QE-ending decisions all are “data dependent” just on this series – and what the JOLTS Net Turnover series shows.

It shows the following:

In short: from January to September (we exclude the October 204K print as there is no matching JOLTS number yet) the average monthly jobs gain per the Non-farm Payrolls report is 184K. However, when looking at the implied job gains per the JOLTS Net Turnover, this number is a far more disturbing 150K, some 20% lower.

Keep in mind this is using the adjusted, post-revision data, prior to which JOLTS suggested an average monthly gain as low as 125K.

This is a crucial difference and one which may be very critical in the eyes of the Fed when deciding on whether or not to taper in December, or March. Because now that we have entered a period in which the Fed itself is talking down the impact of “overoptimistic” jobs data in an attempt to delay tapering as much as possible, even invoking the labor force participation rate as a mitigating factor in the unemployment rate drop, what Bernanke and soon Yellen need, is another core data series showing the reality is actually worse than is being represented.

And what better source than the BLS’ own “secondary” survey of jobs?

Finally, one wonders: why does the NFP report so persistently over-represent jobs and under-represent employment? Because if the only purpose of US economic data is to serve a political agenda, one can see why the only variable that matters in the New Normal is the Fed.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/lJh7AMf-rPg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Science Supports Using Video Games as a Babysitter*

And it might save money on driving lessons. Think about it!The latest research into the
impact of video games on children’s minds comes from studying the
behavior of more than 11,000 children between the ages of 5 and 7
across the United Kingdom. That’s a pretty big pool. Their
conclusion: No correlation between playing video games and any sort
of conduct problems whatsoever. The study also focused on
television viewing and determined that kids who watch lots of
television but don’t play video games were more likely to have
conduct problems than those who do play video games.

The study from the University of Glasgow is available
here
(pdf) and is a fairly easy read. As with any mass study
like this, there are some gaps. Because of the voluntary scope of
participation, the sampling isn’t fully representative and depended
on the accuracy of information reported by the children’s mothers.
They separated children by gender and by how much time they spent
each day playing video games or watching television. They evaluated
the “psychosocial adjustment” of participants in several categories
to determine emotional or conduct problems after they reached 7
years. They really did not find that much, but they did note:
“Children playing no games were more likely to show increased
problems (except peer problems) compared with playing [less than
one hour] daily.” The only statistically significant association
they discovered was among children who watched three or more hours
of television a day. They showed more conduct problems, but even
then the number was low. And they didn’t notice any difference
based on gender.

Still though, the total gaming exposure of these young kids is
pretty low – less than four percent reported playing video games
for more than three hours per weekday. The game panic these days is
focused on teens who go on marathon Call of Duty binges
for hours on end. I don’t see this study taking the wind out of
that argument, but it could come a as a relief to parents who feel
judged by those media nannies suggesting that their little loved
ones are being turned into monsters by their Nintendo Wii.

* No, of course it doesn’t.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/science-supports-using-video-games-as-a
via IFTTT

Dollar’s 30 Year Slide May Be Gold’s New Life: 2014 Outlook

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,241.75, EUR 918.59 and GBP 766.75 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,248.50, EUR 929.64 and GBP 775.76 per ounce.

Gold fell $1.50 or 0.12% yesterday, closing at $1,243.20/oz. Silver climbed $0.14 or 0.71% closing at $19.99/oz. Platinum rose $4.60 or 033% to $1,389.50/oz, while palladium climbed $3.78 or 0.53% to $714.75/oz.

Download here: Talking Real Money: Barter v Bitcoin

Many traders and investors are still scratching their heads at the peculiar gold trading Wednesday which pushed gold below the important technical level of $1,250/oz. Support at $1,250/oz has been breached and gold is vulnerable of a fall to test support at $1,200/oz and the June 28th low of $1,180/oz (see charts below).


US Dollar Index – 1983 to Today (Bloomberg Industries)
 
And yet gold still seems to be stuck in a downtrend. This week’s sell off may have been due to trading shenanigans on the COMEX and many, including the UK Financial Regulator are asking questions as to whether gold price rigging is taking place.

Gold’s falls come despite there being many compelling reasons for gold to rally. These include uber dove Yellen at the Fed’s helm, the near certainty that the Eurozone debt crisis will erupt early in the New Year, signs ETF outflows are stabilizing and China picking up the slack with regard to physical demand, after India’s demand fell from near record levels.


Gold in U.S. Dollars, 5 Days – (Bloomberg)

THE U.S. DOLLAR has been on a 30 year slide versus other competing paper currencies, in particular the Chinese yuan. If the dollar’s decline, as measured by the DXY Index continues, gold may be the main beneficiary.

The dollar may be printed in unlimited quantities, though the global stock of gold increases by just 2% to 2.5% annually. Irrespective, of the huge increase in money supplies globally today. Indeed, should gold prices fall more, gold production is likely to begin falling.

This is seemingly lost on Janet Yellen and central banks, who continue to print money at record rates.

The smart money who understand gold’s importance as a diversification continue to accumulate gold.

The very poor state of the U.S. economy bodes badly for the U.S. dollar in 2014 which should help gold resume its multi year bull market.


Gold in U.S. Dollars, 1 Year – (Bloomberg)

DATA FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND today shows that central banks continued to diversify into gold in October.

Turkey’s holdings rose the most, with the central bank adding a large 12.994 tonnes – 16.18 million oz vs. 15.762 million oz.  Kazakhstan’s gold reserves rose 2.4 tons and Azerbaijan’s gold reserves increased 2 tonnes last month.

Germany, the world’s second biggest holder of gold reserves, cut its bullion holdings by a tiny amount in October for the second time in five months.  Germany’s gold holdings dropped to 108.9 million ounces from 109.01 million ounces in September. The reduction was likely for domestic gold coin sales.


Gold in U.S. Dollars  and Suspensions Of COMEX Gold Trading – 3 Month (Bloomberg)

GOLDMAN SACHS Inc. has come out with another of their widely covered market predictions.

Gold, iron ore, soybeans and copper will probably drop at least 15% next year as commodities face increased downside risks even as economic growth in the U.S. accelerates, according to Goldman.

As we noted before, Goldman’s gold calls and crystal gazing have been poor at best. Indeed, some suspect that while Goldman is advising clients to sell, they may be on the other side of the the trade going long.

News This Week
* China to Start Interbank Gold Swap Trading November 25
China, on track to overtake India as the world’s largest gold consumer this year, will start interbank swaps trading next week in a move to further open up the domestic precious metals market. China gold swaps to trade on China Foreign Exchange Trade System, according to a statement on CFETS website yesterday. Gold swaps to settle and deliver via Shanghai Gold Exchange.
(Bloomberg)

* China’s planned crude oil futures may be priced in yuan 
 The Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) may price its crude oil futures contract in yuan and use medium sour crude as its benchmark, its chairman said on Thursday, adding that the bourse is speeding up preparatory work to secure regulatory approvals.

China, which overtook the United States as the world’s top oil importer in September, hopes the contract will become a benchmark in Asia and has said it would allow foreign investors to trade in the contract without setting up a local subsidiary.
(Reuters)

* Germany Lowers Gold Reserves in October, IMF Data Show
Holdings drop to 108.9 Million ounces vs. 109.01 Million ounces in September., data on IMF website show. (Note: Likely for domestic gold coin sales)
(Bloomberg)

* Gold-Put Options Surge as Futures Slump to Lowest in Four Months
Put options on gold, giving the owners the right to sell Dec. futures at $1,200/oz and $1,250/oz, more than tripled on the Comex in New York after the metal slumped to a four-month low.
Puts giving the owner the right to sell at $1,200 rose to $2.30 from 70c on estimated volume of 1,259 contracts, the third most-active option.

Puts giving the owner the right to sell at $1,250 jumped to $15.10, the highest in a month, on estimated volume of 2,206 contracts, the most-active option
Futures for Dec. delivery fell as much as 2.6% to $1,240.20/oz, the lowest since July 9
(Bloomberg)

* China Oct. Silver Imports 230.8 Tons, Customs Says
Silver imports by China were 230.8 tons in Oct., compared with 243 tons in Sept., according to data released by customs agency today
(Bloomberg)

* UBS Estimates 36% of South Africa Gold Industry is Losing Money
Estimate based on spot price of $1,260/oz, UBS says in report dated yday.
In 3Q, 28% of SA gold industry was loss-making, based on gold price of $1,330/oz
Sector lowered 3Q all-in costs by 20% q/q to $1,138/oz
“Further unit cost reductions will be challenging to deliver”
(Bloomberg)

* CME Lowers Gold and Silver Margins
CME lowers Comex 100 Gold futures (GC) initial margins for specs by 9.4 percent to $7,975 per contract from $8,800
CME lowers Comex 5000 Silver futures (SI) initial margins for specs by 11.1 percent to $11,000 per contract from $12,375
(Reuters)

Conclusion
There is likely a floor under gold prices at the $1,200 level and that should again provide strong support. There are no guarantees regarding price ever – particularly in the short term. However, gold production may fall at prices below $1,200 as it becomes uneconomical for many gold mines to operate profitably.

In South Africa, no longer the world’s largest producer, (which is now China) but still a major producer, there are estimates that 36% of the South African gold industry are loss making even at today’s spot prices – $1,250/oz. In 3Q, 28% of the South African gold industry was loss making, based on a gold price of $1,330/oz.

The short term technicals remain poor and the trend remains lower so we remain bearish for next week despite the strong seasonals. November, December and January are traditionally strong months for gold due to year end fund allocation and in recent years Chinese New Year demand.

It remains prudent to ignore short term noise and day to day price movements. Instead focus on physical gold’s importance, either in your possession or in allocated gold accounts, as financial insurance and as a vital diversification for investors and savers today.

Download here: Talking Real Money: Barter v Bitcoin

Click Gold News For This Week’s Breaking Gold And Silver News
Click Gold and Silver Commentary For This Week’s Leading Gold, Silver Opinion
Like Our Facebook Page For Interesting Insights, Blogs, Prizes and Special Offers


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/60xAd5YJI10/story01.htm GoldCore

Dollar's 30 Year Slide May Be Gold's New Life: 2014 Outlook

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,241.75, EUR 918.59 and GBP 766.75 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,248.50, EUR 929.64 and GBP 775.76 per ounce.

Gold fell $1.50 or 0.12% yesterday, closing at $1,243.20/oz. Silver climbed $0.14 or 0.71% closing at $19.99/oz. Platinum rose $4.60 or 033% to $1,389.50/oz, while palladium climbed $3.78 or 0.53% to $714.75/oz.

Download here: Talking Real Money: Barter v Bitcoin

Many traders and investors are still scratching their heads at the peculiar gold trading Wednesday which pushed gold below the important technical level of $1,250/oz. Support at $1,250/oz has been breached and gold is vulnerable of a fall to test support at $1,200/oz and the June 28th low of $1,180/oz (see charts below).


US Dollar Index – 1983 to Today (Bloomberg Industries)
 
And yet gold still seems to be stuck in a downtrend. This week’s sell off may have been due to trading shenanigans on the COMEX and many, including the UK Financial Regulator are asking questions as to whether gold price rigging is taking place.

Gold’s falls come despite there being many compelling reasons for gold to rally. These include uber dove Yellen at the Fed’s helm, the near certainty that the Eurozone debt crisis will erupt early in the New Year, signs ETF outflows are stabilizing and China picking up the slack with regard to physical demand, after India’s demand fell from near record levels.


Gold in U.S. Dollars, 5 Days – (Bloomberg)

THE U.S. DOLLAR has been on a 30 year slide versus other competing paper currencies, in particular the Chinese yuan. If the dollar’s decline, as measured by the DXY Index continues, gold may be the main beneficiary.

The dollar may be printed in unlimited quantities, though the global stock of gold increases by just 2% to 2.5% annually. Irrespective, of the huge increase in money supplies globally today. Indeed, should gold prices fall more, gold production is likely to begin falling.

This is seemingly lost on Janet Yellen and central banks, who continue to print money at record rates.

The smart money who understand gold’s importance as a diversification continue to accumulate gold.

The very poor state of the U.S. economy bodes badly for the U.S. dollar in 2014 which should help gold resume its multi year bull market.


Gold in U.S. Dollars, 1 Year – (Bloomberg)

DATA FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND today shows that central banks continued to diversify into gold in October.

Turkey’s holdings rose the most, with the central bank adding a large 12.994 tonnes – 16.18 million oz vs. 15.762 million oz.  Kazakhstan’s gold reserves rose 2.4 tons and Azerbaijan’s gold reserves increased 2 tonnes last month.

Germany, the world’s second biggest holder of gold reserves, cut its bullion holdings by a tiny amount in October for the second time in five months.  Germany’s gold holdings dropped to 108.9 million ounces from 109.01 million ounces in September. The reduction was likely for domestic gold coin sales.


Gold in U.S. Dollars  and Suspensions Of COMEX Gold Trading – 3 Month (Bloomberg)

GOLDMAN SACHS Inc. has come out with another of their widely covered market predictions.

Gold, iron ore, soybeans and copper will probably drop at least 15% next year as commodities face increased downside risks even as economic growth in the U.S. accelerates, according to Goldman.

As we noted before, Goldman’s gold calls and crystal gazing have been poor at best. Indeed, some suspect that while Goldman is advising clients to sell, they may be on the other side of the the trade going long.

News This Week
* China to Start Interbank Gold Swap Trading November 25
China, on track to overtake India as the world’s largest gold consumer this year, will start interbank swaps trading next week in a move to further open up the domestic precious metals market. China gold swaps to trade on China Foreign Exchange Trade System, according to a statement on CFETS website yesterday. Gold swaps to settle and deliver via Shanghai Gold Exchange.
(Bloomberg)

* China’s planned crude oil futures may be priced in yuan 
 The Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) may price its crude oil futures contract in yuan and use medium sour crude as its benchmark, its chairman said on Thursday, adding that the bourse is speeding up preparatory work to secure regulatory approvals.

China, which overtook the United States as the world’s top oil importer in September, hopes the contract will become a benchmark in Asia and has said it would allow foreign investors to trade in the contract without setting up a local subsidiary.
(Reuters)

* Germany Lowers Gold Reserves in October, IMF Data Show
Holdings drop to 108.9 Million ounces vs. 109.01 Million ounces in September., data on IMF website show. (Note: Likely for domestic gold coin sales)
(Bloomberg)

* Gold-Put Options Surge as Futures Slump to Lowest in Four Months
Put options on gold, giving the owners the right to sell Dec. futures at $1,200/oz and $1,250/oz, more than tripled on the Comex in New York after the metal slumped to a four-month low.
Puts giving the owner the right to sell at $1,200 rose to $2.30 from 70c on estimated volume of 1,259 contracts, the third most-active option.

Puts giving the owner the right to sell at $1,250 jumped to $15.10, the highest in a month, on estimated volume of 2,206 contracts, the most-active option
Futures for Dec. delivery fell as much as 2.6% to $1,240.20/oz, the lowest since July 9
(Bloomberg)

* China Oct. Silver Imports 230.8 Tons, Customs Says
Silver imports by China were 230.8 tons in Oct., compared with 243 tons in Sept., according to data released by customs agency today
(Bloomberg)

* UBS Estimates 36% of South Africa Gold Industry is Losing Money
Estimate based on spot price of $1,260/oz, UBS says in report dated yday.
In 3Q, 28% of SA gold industry was loss-making, based on gold price of $1,330/oz
Sector lowered 3Q all-in costs by 20% q/q to $1,138/oz
“Further unit cost reductions will be challenging to deliver”
(Bloomberg)

* CME Lowers Gold and Silver Margins
CME lowers Comex 100 Gold futures (GC) initial margins for specs by 9.4 percent to $7,975 per contract from $8,800
CME lowers Comex 5000 Silver futures (SI) initial margins for specs by 11.1 percent to $11,000 per contract from $12,375
(Reuters)

Conclusion
There is likely a floor under gold prices at the $1,200 level and that should again provide strong support. There are no guarantees regarding price ever – particularly in the short term. However, gold production may fall at prices below $1,200 as it becomes uneconomical for man
y gold mines to operate profitably.

In South Africa, no longer the world’s largest producer, (which is now China) but still a major producer, there are estimates that 36% of the South African gold industry are loss making even at today’s spot prices – $1,250/oz. In 3Q, 28% of the South African gold industry was loss making, based on a gold price of $1,330/oz.

The short term technicals remain poor and the trend remains lower so we remain bearish for next week despite the strong seasonals. November, December and January are traditionally strong months for gold due to year end fund allocation and in recent years Chinese New Year demand.

It remains prudent to ignore short term noise and day to day price movements. Instead focus on physical gold’s importance, either in your possession or in allocated gold accounts, as financial insurance and as a vital diversification for investors and savers today.

Download here: Talking Real Money: Barter v Bitcoin

Click Gold News For This Week’s Breaking Gold And Silver News
Click Gold and Silver Commentary For This Week’s Leading Gold, Silver Opinion
Like Our Facebook Page For Interesting Insights, Blogs, Prizes and Special Offers


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/60xAd5YJI10/story01.htm GoldCore

Close Encounter Of The Tornado Kind: Watch What Happens When Nature’s Fury Is Unleashed

Aside from the impressively calm demeanor of the gentleman holding the video camera, this disturbing clip of the Washington Tornado’s power offers a helpful (if not terrifying) analogy for how quickly calm serene surroundings (e.g. stock markets) can be “freaking destroyed” almost instantly by an external force.

 

 

And for the Keynesians, before you start babbling about the GDP growth in the rebuild – please visit the Broken Window Fallacy truth page.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nX2Vf8vovok/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Close Encounter Of The Tornado Kind: Watch What Happens When Nature's Fury Is Unleashed

Aside from the impressively calm demeanor of the gentleman holding the video camera, this disturbing clip of the Washington Tornado’s power offers a helpful (if not terrifying) analogy for how quickly calm serene surroundings (e.g. stock markets) can be “freaking destroyed” almost instantly by an external force.

 

 

And for the Keynesians, before you start babbling about the GDP growth in the rebuild – please visit the Broken Window Fallacy truth page.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nX2Vf8vovok/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Jacob Sullum on How Poker Became a Crime

Jacob Sullum reviews
Straight Flush: The True Story of Six College Friends Who Dealt
Their Way to a Billion-Dollar Online Poker Empire-and How It All
Came Crashing Down
. He says the engaging, novelistic style
brings home the human consequences of the moralistic crusade
against online gambling. 

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/jacob-sullum-on-how-poker-became-a-crime
via IFTTT

Spot The Manipulated FX Market Moment

With regulators finally catching on that banks are manipulating every asset class, the largest of them all – foreign exchange – has come under scrutiny. Most specifically, there is considerable attention being paid to manipulation at the “London Close” around 11amET each day. Judge for yourself – see anything ‘odd’ around that time of day?

 

 

 

Source: Nanex


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bbd3Vte2O5g/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Did a Top Obamacare Tech Official Mislead Congress About the Decision to Delay Obamacare’s Shopping Feature?

Did a top Obamacare tech
official lie to Congress about whether or not a key Obamacare
website function was delayed for political considerations?

In a congressional hearing earlier this month, Henry Chao, the
Deputy IT director for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services, was asked whether there were any political considerations
involved in the last-minute decision to delay the “anonymous
shopper” function at Obamacare’s online insurance portal,
Healthcare.gov.

He responded that there were “none whatsoever.”

“I look at the facts of whether—if a system is going to be
ready,” Chao
said
, “and of course not everything is going to be 100 percent
perfect, and there are certain tolerances. But in this case it
failed so miserably that we could not consciously use it.”

But that’s not what happened,
according to CNN
, which reports that insider documents confirm
that, in fact, the feature passed a test of its functionality
shortly before the October 1 launch of Healthcare.gov. From CNN’s
report: 

When the troubled federal health care website came online,
the key “Anonymous Shopper” function was nowhere to be found —
even though it passed a key test almost two weeks before
HealthCare.gov launched.

That successful test, noted in documents obtained by CNN and
confirmed by a source close to the project, contradicts testimony
from an Obama administration official overseeing HealthCare.gov,
who told lawmakers earlier this month the function was scrapped
because it “failed miserably” before the October 1 launch.

Perhaps the CNN story is missing some key information. We don’t
know, for example, if there was perhaps another test that did
fail—one that convinced the health site’s tech team that the
function wasn’t worth implementing.

But there’s some reason to think that CNN’s story is not
incomplete, and that Chao, in his response, did not tell the truth.
The CNN report backs up, and seems to confirm, an October report in
The Wall Street Journal, which
said
that the federally run insurance portal “was initially
going to include an option to browse before registering, but that
tool was delayed.” The Journal report included an
explanation for why the function was removed—an explanation that
said nothing about technical failures. “An HHS spokeswoman said the
agency wanted to ensure that users were aware of their eligibility
for subsidies that could help pay for coverage, before they started
seeing the prices of policies.”

In other words, officials didn’t want people to see the true
price of the insurance premiums on offer through the exchanges, so
they created a system which only allowed for plan shopping after
subsidy eligibility was confirmed. 

That doesn’t sound like it was simply a question of system
readiness, as Chao claimed before Congress. And if Chao lied about
the test results, it’s reasonable to wonder whether he also misled
about the reasoning for disabling the feature.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/did-a-top-obamacare-tech-official-mislea
via IFTTT