U.S. Military Probed: Bought Afghans $468M in Planes, Sold as $32K Scrap

The U.S. Air Force is being probed over a
financial snafu. The department reaped a mere $32,000 in scrap for
16 aircrafts that cost $486 million.

The Wall Street Journal
explains
:

At issue is a fleet of Italian-built C-27A cargo planes that
were procured for the Afghan Air Force, which has a shortage of
air-lifters to haul troops and equipment. The Afghans began
receiving the twin-engine aircraft, also known as the G222, in
2009, but the planes were grounded for several months in 2012
because of a lack of adequate maintenance and spare parts.

Including maintenance costs, the Air Force’s total tab was $596
million before officials decided to park the planes, and ultimately
sell them for scrap at six cents a pound.

“The G222 fleet was unable to fulfill mission needs, a decision
was made to discontinue the program in December 2012, and the
contract was allowed to expire in March 2013,” said Marine Corps
Maj. Brad Avots, a Defense Department spokesman. “The Department of
Defense recently completed disposal of aircraft located in Kabul,
Afghanistan to minimize impact on drawdown of U.S. forces in
Afghanistan.”

Couldn’t they have done anything else? That’s what government
watchdog Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction
John Sopko wants to know. “I am concerned that the officials
responsible for planning and executing the scrapping of the planes
may not have considered other possible alternatives in order to
salvage taxpayer dollars,” he wrote in a letter last week that was
made public yesterday.

Reuters
reports
:

Sopko also asked if any other parts of the planes had been sold
before they were destroyed by the Defense Logistics Agency.

Sopko’s office has been investigating the matter since December
2013 after numerous non-profit groups and military officials raised
questions about funds wasted on the planes. …

In an interview last year with NBC News, Sopko said it was
unclear if the incident was criminal fraud or mismanagement, but
the waste was not an isolated incident in Afghanistan.

The Pentagon’s inspector general has also investigated the
issue, which the non-profit group Project on Government Oversight
(POGO) calls “a shining example of the billions wasted in
Afghanistan.”

Similarly,
billions of dollars-worth
of mine-resistant ambush-protected
vehicles are being scrapped in Afghanistan.

Such issues of financial mismanagement by the military remain
relevant in light of the
rising price
of fighting ISIS in Iraq, and the Obama
administration’s deal with Afghanistan to keep around 10,000
American troops in the country after the war officially “ends,” and
that “U.S. funding for Afghanistan [will be] up to $8 billion
annually for military and other assistance for at least the next
three years,”
according
to The Washington Post

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wcb4Io
via IFTTT

Ronald Bailey Outlines How Cutting-Edge Medicine Might Have Spared Us the Ebola Epidemic

Ebola PatientThe number of people infected with Ebola in the
West Africa outbreak now exceeds 8,000; 3,857 have died of the
disease. Computer disease model estimates by Eurosurveillance
suggest that the number of people with the illness could grow by an
additional 77,181, to 277,124 cases by the end of 2014. The U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calculates that if the
rate at which infected people are isolated is not substantially
increased, the number of cases could swell to somewhere between
555,000 and 1.4 million cases by mid-January. Reason
Science Correspondent Ronald Bailey explains how it could have been
otherwise.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wcb3Eq
via IFTTT

Crude Rises On News ISIS Has Entered One Of Baghdad’s Suburbs

Just like the German-economy crushing Ukraine civil war, which promptly faded into obscurity, so the mainstream appears to have bored quickly with the recent developments surrounding ISIS, with conventional wisdom inexplicably convinced that US airstrikes have managed to stop the Al-Qaeda 2.0 menace dead in its tracks. Nothing could be further from the truth.

But while the western world could care less about the fate of some backwater town on the border between Syria and Turkey, it certainly cares about what happens to the Iraqi oilfields located south of Baghdad (which serve to determine the marginal price of oil around the world). Well, the world may not care, but crude traders certainly do, and the reason why oil appears to be rising in recent trade…

… is due to news that ISIS militants have infiltrated one of Baghdad’s outer suburbs, Abu Ghraib which is only eight miles from the runway perimeter of Baghdad’s international airport.

CBS reports that the arrival of ISIS is cause for serious concern now that the Iraqi Defense Ministry has confirmed ISIS has MANPADs, shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles.

The Iraqi army is still patrolling Abu Ghraib, but they play cat and mouse with the ISIS fighters who stage hit and run attacks on security forces.

 

 

It’s a mixed picture around the city. ISIS took over the city of Fallujah — only about 40 miles west of Baghdad — in January, and the Iraqi security forces have fought in vain for a year to force them out.

As noted above, in the latest embarrassment for Obama, instead, and in spite of weeks of U.S.-led airstrikes, ISIS has gradually extended its reach. The extremist group is now either present or in control of a huge swath of countryside, forming a 180-degree arc around the Iraqi capital from due north around to the west, and all the way to the south. Around this zone there have been skirmishes, and occasionally heavy fighting, with Iraqi security forces and Shiite militias battling ISIS.

If ISIS has indeed arrived, it is likely that things will rapidly move from here, as Baghdad contains numerous ISIS sleeper cells that carry out almost daily bombings and assassinations.

An Iraqi officer told CBS News that the airstrikes are helping to clear an ISIS-free buffer zone around the city, where there are Iraqi boots on the ground. In fact, there are 60,000 men assigned to defend the capital, and CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that there are 12 teams of American advisers deployed with the Iraqi brigades.

LOL “advisers.” The same advisers who estimate that the Iraqi army will fight for the capital and there is no real concern that Baghdad is in imminent danger.  Alas, any bets that the Iraq army can do anything do oppose ISIS can only generate deep laughter: “as at least three major Iraqi military debacles have shown over the past five months — the most stunning being the quick fall of Mosul in the north — the army is plagued with problems of poor leadership and endemic corruption that undermine their effectiveness as a fighting force.”

As Martin reported from the Pentagon on Thursday, due to the relatively poor performance of the Iraqi troops west of Baghdad, the airstrikes are having a limited impact.

For those who have lost the plot line by this point, here is a summary: the US is blaming the army that the US spent billions to equip and tradin for being unable to defend against a jihadist force that the US spent billions to equip and train.

Meanwhile, the US is closer and closer to losing the laughable “adivser” moniker, and calling the local boots on the ground for what they are. It got that much closer to doing that over the weekend when the US used Apache attack helicopters — for the first time in the fight against ISIS — in Anbar province on Sunday.

Last week, the fighting in Anbar verged on a rout of the Iraqi army, Martin reports. In the past few days the ISIS offensive has slowed, but analysts aren’t sure if that’s because ISIS is overextended or are simply taking an “operational pause” while they reposition for the resumption of the offensive. Judging by the sudden renaissance of oil, at least it is clear what crude traders are thinking right about now.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1s35uI6 Tyler Durden

This is the best currency to hold for now (you may be surprised)

shutterstock 191404670 This is the best currency to hold for now (you may be surprised)

October 10, 2014
Santiago, Chile

I just got off a two-hour conference call with the board of directors of our agricultural investment company.

I’m fortunate that our board is comprised of some incredibly smart people, including a senior executive at one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, another investment banking executive, private wealth manager, etc.

These are very intelligent people who understand both finance and agriculture.

Our conversation this morning turned to exchange rates, and we discussed the future of the US dollar.

Bear in mind that we all hold a rather dim view of the dollar’s long-term fundamentals. That is, after all, why we pooled funds to trade paper currency for high quality productive farmland.

But over the coming months, our consensus was that the US dollar is in a favorable position when ranked against other major fiat currencies. I’ll explain why:

There are only a handful of currencies in the world that can handle huge institutional inflows and outflows.

A fund manager moving $100 billion, for example, can’t park that money in the Costa Rican colon, or the Tanzanian shilling.

It would be impossible. That amount of money would practically swallow the entire money supply and wreck havoc on the local economy.

The only currencies right now that are globally liquid and can really handle such massive flows are the US dollar, the euro, and the yen.

The yen is the worst off; the Japanese government is in absolutely abysmal condition spending upwards of 25% of its central government tax revenue just to pay interest on the debt. And the situation gets worse by the day.

In Europe, many interest rates are now in negative territory. If you purchase a short-term German government bond, for example, you have to PAY THEM for the privilege of loaning them your money. It’s nuts.

By comparison, even though the US government’s financial position is absolutely atrocious, the dollar is the least ugly of the three.

To wit, institutional investors have been selling yen and euros in favor of US dollar assets. And we’ve seen this play out via the steady strengthening of the USD exchange rate for those currencies.

The euro, for example, was at $1.39 just five months ago. It hit $1.25 last week—a 10% drop in just five months.

This is a result of institutional money flows. The dollar is being viewed, despite its deep, fundamental problems, as the safe haven currency. And institutions are buying.

Now, while this outlook will likely persist over the coming months, the long-term outlook for the dollar remains clear. And China’s renminbi is a big part of that.

The international use of the renminbi rises with each passing month.

Institutions, central banks, large corporations, and even governments are beginning to use the renminbi more and more. They’re holding it as an official reserve, and they’re even cutting oil deals in renminbi.

We’re seeing commodities contracts traded, priced, and settled in renminbi. And renminbi trading hubs are being rapidly established in Western financial centers, notably London and Zurich.

Plus, the Chinese government is gradually loosening the renminbi’s restrictions, allowing convertibility on a global scale. Bottom line, they WANT the renminbi to be a global currency.

This will provide a critical fourth option for institutional capital flows.

And while China is saturated with challenges on multiple fronts, the renminbi’s fundamentals are far more attractive when stacked against the dollar, euro, and yen.

Over the coming years, we can expect more and more institutional capital flows into the renminbi.

But for now, at least until another looming US government shutdown spooks investors, we can expect the dollar to reign.

It’s a sad statement of the global financial system when a country that has accumulated more debt than any other nation in the history of the world appears to be the ‘least bad’ choice.

That said, there are options.

The Hong Kong dollar is currently pegged to the US dollar at a rate of 7.80 HKD per US dollar and trades within a very narrow band.

This means that if the US dollar maintains its strength, or if it appreciates further, the Hong Kong dollar will strengthen along with it.

But if the US dollar were to devalue sharply… or experience a sudden, terminal decline, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority could de-peg the Hong Kong dollar.

In this way, your downside risk is protected, yet you maintain your upside potential in case the dollar improves further. And you practically eliminate exchange rate fluctuation in the meantime.

Of the available options, the Hong Kong dollar is a strong choice to consider.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1vUfjbZ
via IFTTT

U.S. Government Wants to Charge $1,500 to Take a Photo in Federal Wilderness Areas

Screen Shot 2014-10-10 at 11.16.44 AMGo ahead and file this in the ever expanding category of: “WTF, how is this possible, America is becoming a crazy banana republic.”

When I first saw this headline, I was certain it had to be misleading. Someone had to be exaggerating in the pursuit of click-bait. Incredibly, it was another case of truth being stranger than fiction, with the article actually far worse than I imagined.

You ready for this? Have a seat, take a deep breath, and brace yourself for unbridled fascism. From OregonLive:

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1uReXo3
via IFTTT

Cop Asks Driver: ‘Why Is It That Everyone Who Plays Frisbee Golf Smokes Weed?’

After a routine traffic stop involving a busted headlight, an
Ankeny, Iowa, police officer asked the car’s driver if he liked to
play frisbee golf. The driver responded in the affirmative.

Then the cop asked, “Answer me this question, why is it that
everyone who plays Frisbee golf smokes weed?”

Things quickly went downhill from there. The officer followed up
his question with a number of confusing statements and half-hearted
attempts to trick the driver into consenting to a search of the
vehicle (“You can’t tell me you’ve never smoked weed before,” “How
much weed do you have in the car tonight?”). The stunned but savvy
driver, keenly aware of what the cop was doing, maintained that he
had no drugs on him but would not be consenting to any searches
based on the habits of other frisbee golf players.

“Just because I have a disc golf bag does not mean that every
disc golfer does have weed,” said the driver.

After a two-minute interrogation, the officer left without
performing a search.

“Oh my fucking gosh,” said the driver’s passenger after the
encounter had ended.

Oh my fucking gosh, indeed.

A video of the incident was posted to
Youtube
. Local news channel
KCCI.com
followed up with the Ankeny police department; Chief
Gary Mikulec apologized for the officer’s line of questioning and
said the matter would be investigated.

Watch out, frisbee golfers. Video below.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qy28sx
via IFTTT

“Financial Markets Are Artificially Priced: What Do You Do?” – Bill Gross’ First Janus Capital Letter

From Bill Gross at JanusCapital

Dear Friends,

Dancing, or better yet as the beginning of my Investment Outlook suggests, being asked to dance, seems to have become an important part of my life over the past month or so. Having first been asked by my wonderful wife, Sue, and now by Dick Weil and Janus from a business standpoint, I write to you today from my desk in a new Janus office in Newport Beach, California. I am excited to be here and to begin a new chapter of my career. Before I get on with the main business of markets and investing in the attached Investment Outlook, I am of course aware that my change of employment has raised a lot of questions. I hope that you will understand that I cannot answer all of your questions, but here is what I can share with you.

Let me address the most obvious question first: Why did I leave PIMCO? Had there been a reasonable way to continue there, I would have stayed to my last breath. I was honored by the trust of the millions of clients and thousands of employees over decades. They have been the center of my life’s work. I am very proud of my record there for more than 40 years. PIMCO is a great firm with lots of great people, and Allianz was a fine owner for many years. But slowly and with great hesitation, I came to understand that it was time for me to leave. It happens sometimes to founders! But that is water under the bridge, as they say. I don’t plan to address it further. Now let’s talk about the future.

The second question on your minds may be “Why Janus?” My first professional loves were markets, investing and competing in that framework. I want to return to a simpler role, completely focused on markets, investment performance and serving my clients. It seems like a good time to turn away from the complexity of helping to run a huge firm. I have had a 20-year relationship with Janus CEO Dick Weil (10 of which include his working for me as PIMCO’s Chief Operating Officer). When I asked him whether Janus might provide me with that simple opportunity, he responded with a very enthusiastic “yes” let’s dance together. I am excited to work in a true partnership environment with people I trust. I want to help this team succeed. Most importantly, I want to continue to help clients achieve their goals. I am not ready to retire, so here I am.

I am focused on looking ahead. I have met some wonderful people at Janus, and I see great opportunities for the Janus Global Unconstrained Bond strategy. As a brand new strategy it is tiny, certainly compared to anything I have been used to in recent decades. But that opens the door to a lot of new strategies and opportunities to generate outperformance for my new (and hopefully many continuing) clients. I am also looking forward to working with my old friend and Nobel-laureate Myron Scholes on asset allocation and with the existing Janus fundamental, credit-based fixed income team. It is exciting for me, and I hope for you as well.
Although these changes are significant, the most important things have not and will not change. I am competitive as ever, and I expect to win for my clients. You can count on me to deliver my usual global macro insights and hopefully excellent portfolio management in the years ahead. So that’s it. I look forward to serving you from my new seat at Janus.

Now, on to my first Janus Investment Outlook.

Sincerely,

William H. Gross

You Only Dance Twice

No marriage ever seems totally complete. There is a missing link in almost all of them. Picture perfection belongs only in fairy tales and when it happens it almost always comes at the end of the story, when the princess kisses her frog prince and they live happily ever after. My 30-year marriage with Sue has been one of those – me the frog and she the princess – but never one of ultimate completion or fulfillment – until now. Happy as we were for all those years, there was always something missing, a trivial last puzzle piece to be sure, but a noticeable one nonetheless, at least to me:

We had never danced!

Although we had figuratively waltzed through those three decades, I had from time to time wondered about the actual dancing. Oh, there had been the perfunctory wedding box-step in front of a gawking audience of 40 or so, but nothing much ever since. Blame it on me or Sue, or both of our reluctances to make fools of ourselves. Yet every so often Sue had hinted of her “disco” years before we had met – the flowing skirts, the Travolta “Stayin’ Alive” twirl – and somehow I felt that the missing link must somehow be me. Young Bill, as I explained to her during frequent missed dancing opportunities through the years, had taken ballroom dancing in the fifth grade and had learned to do a pretty fancy “bop” step as well. Yet somehow I never took the final step, the one where you ask your partner to dance!
That all changed on September 2, 2014 – the day Sue asked me to dance! Maybe it was that extra vodka martini on her side of the table, maybe, as she said later that night, it was my “fluffy hair” or maybe it was just the fated last piece of a puzzle coming together on the perimeter of what to me has been a uniquely wonderful marriage. Whatever. We danced!

I must tell you though that this was no ordinary dance. She – the ex-Disco Queen – and I the young student of Arthur Murray, strutted, boogied, discoed with moves that neither of us thought we could ever do – sober or even mildly inebriated. We dipped, we twirled, I even did a bop or two. Travolta would have been proud. We were “Stayin’ Alive!” Most of all, however we smiled! Not the perfunctory smile of our self-conscious wedding dance three decades before, but big, huge, free-flowing grins of having fun – real fun on a dance floor!

Midnight came as it does in most fairy tales, but I wondered no more what I had missed in the years before we had met and the 30 years since. My puzzle was complete. Sue had asked me to dance, and it turned out to be just like a fairy tale. Picture perfect.

Picture perfection or fairy tale endings do not describe the global economy or even its financial markets more than five years after its Minsky/Lehman moment. While U.S. bond and equity markets have been thrust into a seemingly safe outer orbit, the same cannot be said for other developed and developing nations. Many economies in turn have entered or are bordering on recessions with limited monetary firepower remaining to promote real growth. The dancing has begun to resemble the last stages of a 1920s marathon with partners clinging to each other in a desperate attempt to keep from falling down. The Charleston is a faded memory from yesteryear and the long ago apparition of the “Great Moderation.” What are policy makers, and more to the point, investors to do?

I have the following tough love advice – somewhat resembling the counsel given to me in recent weeks: there is a new financial era. Accept it and modify your behavior accordingly, so that your future is safe, secure, and you look forward to a brighter tomorrow. I will explain.

Financial markets are artificially priced. In the bond market, there is nothing normal about a three year German Bund yielding a “minus” 10 basis points. Similarly, UK Gilts and U.S. Treasurys have in recent years never experienced such low yields and therefore high prices. The same comparison can be applied to stocks. While profits in many cases are at record highs, the discounting of future profit streams by an artificially low interest rate results in corresponding high P/E ratios. Real estate cap rates, which help to price homes and commercial shopping centers, are affected in the same way. While monetary policy with its Quantitative Easing and forward guidance for low future interest rates have salvaged a semblance of growth and job gains – especially in the U.S. – they have brought prosperity forward in the financial markets. If yields can’t go much lower, then bond market capital gains are limited. The same logic applies in other asset categories. We have had our Biblical seven years of fat. We must look forward, almost by mathematical necessity, to seven figurative years of leaner: Bonds – 3% to 4% at best, stocks – 5% to 6% on the outside. That may not be enough for your retirement or your kid’s college education. It certainly isn’t for many private and public pension funds that still have a fairy tale belief in an average 7% to 8% return for the next 10 to 20 years! What do you do?

Well the obvious advice on a personal level: Retire later, save more, accept a revised standard of living. But the financial advice varies with your age and willingness to take risk. Younger investors with a Texas Hold’em “all in” attitude could push all of their chips onto the equity table. Boomers nearing retirement probably cannot afford to. A lengthy bear market could force them permanently out of the game. So, one size does not fit all here. It never has.

What might be applicable for most generations, however, is an “unconstrained strategy” that I managed well for the past few years at PIMCO and which now provides me the opportunity for 100% of my time at Janus. An unconstrained strategy sounds very open-ended, and it is. But it allows a professional and experienced investment firm like Janus to select the most attractive alternatives across many asset categories while hopefully diminishing the risk of bond and stock bear markets. The strategy seeks to protect principal while providing an acceptable return in this low yielding, low returning world that I have just described. Unconstrained investors should expect a shorter average maturity for bonds; an ability to profit from currency movements currently taking place with the euro and the yen fits the description as well; taking advantage of what is known as “optionality” and investing in what I have successfully applied in the past with what is called “structured alpha,” would be an important component too. The simple explanation of an unconstrained strategy:

Take your best ideas within the context of a low duration/short maturity portfolio and try to help investors achieve what they consider to be an acceptable return. Watch the fees as well.

Whatever your risk/return persuasion, whether it be stocks, bonds, unconstrained, real estate, or “other,” an “intelligent investor” (as initially described by Benjamin Graham in the late 1940s) should be aware that returns almost necessarily cannot equal the magnificent prior decades that some of you might have experienced during my days at PIMCO. But I/we look forward, with the same intensity and “client comes first” attitude that led to my second marriage at Janus. James Bond famously said that “you only live twice.” I hope to emulate Mr. Bond as Janus Denver and Janus Newport Beach link hands and ideas to improve your financial balance sheet, and ultimately provide a better life for you and your family. Perhaps you only dance twice too. Sue and I would like that.
-William H. Gross




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1oY7aPG Tyler Durden

Is 4th Time The Charm For Stocks Today?

With S&P futures liquidity at near record lows (but what about the HFT liquidity-providers?), it seems the major stock indices are extremely sensitive to any and every headline or JPY twitch. For the 4th time today (and Nth time this week), stocks have decoupled higher from a less exuberant bond market… every other time, stocks have recooupled lower… Fool me once, shame on you… Fool me 4 times, I am Gartman…

 

Liquidity remains non-existent…

 

 

And stocks keep jerking higher in the hopes of starting something that bonds will finish…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1smXxQv Tyler Durden

Texas Prosecutor Wants to Send Adrian Peterson to Jail Because He Admitted to Smoking a “Little Weed”

Adrian PetersonVikings running back Adrian
Peterson, who was charged with felony child abuse after a doctor
found bruises along his four-year-old child’s leg, submitted to
drug testing as part of his $15,000 bond, and reportedly admitted
to an employee at the drug testing agency that he “smoked a little
weed.”

Now the prosecutor in Montgomery County, Texas, wants to revoke
Peterson’s bond and send him to jail because of his admission.
USA Today
reports
:

“In light of this statement, and the fact that it was made
during the urinalysis testing process, and the term ‘weed’ is a
common slang term for marijuana, the state argues that the
defendant has smoked marijuana while free on bond for the current
offense,” the Montgomery County District Attorney’s office
wrote.

Peterson is on the Exempt/Commissoner’s Permission list, meaning
he’s supposed to “remain away from all team activities” and
wouldn’t have to take any tests for the NFL, which prohibits
marijuana use for its players. More than 30 players have been
suspended from the NFL for non-steroid substance use in 2014, about
half of which are for performance enhancing drugs.

Drug testing is a common condition for being released under
state supervision. Peterson’s trial is scheduled for December 1 but
may be postponed if a judge recuses himself for calling members of
the media “attention
whores
.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1oY5BRz
via IFTTT