‘Helicopter Yellen’ Sends Stocks, Gold, Silver Soaring

‘Helicopter Yellen’ Sends Stocks, Gold, Silver Soaring

Gold, silver and stocks surged overnight and today after the Fed maintained their ultra dovish monetary policy stance. The risk to markets of an early hike in U.S. interest rates eased leading to a  fall in the dollar after the release of minutes of the last Federal Reserve policy meeting. 

‘Helicopter Janet’

World stock markets roared their approval of reassurances that the U.S. Federal Reserve will not raise interest rates any time soon. Capital came flooding back into almost every asset class and the dollar fell sharply.

Gold jumped over 1% to $1,224.30 – at a two-week high, while silver surged 2% on the Fed minutes. 

The dollar, jolted lower, while gold, silver and oil and commodity prices rose. The other precious metals also caught the updraft. Silver surged 2% to $17.646 an ounce, platinum was up 0.5% at $1,283.20 an ounce, and palladium was up 0.4% at $803.75 an ounce.


Gold in U.S. Dollars,  5 Days (Thomson Reuters) 

There were big gains on Wall Street and for Asia stocks, and European shares duly followed suit as Britain’s FTSE 100, Germany’s DAX  and France’s CAC 40 rose 0.7%, 1.2% and 0.8% respectively in early trading.

Market participants have interpreted the tone of the FOMC minutes as suggesting that U.S. interest rates could remain lower for longer than most expected, causing the dollar to weaken. 

Observers had been worried that the minutes from Chair Janet Yellen’s Fed could lead to market volatility and further sharp stock market falls. ‘Helicopter Janet’ is confirming the belief of some market participants that she will continue the ultra loose monetary policies of her predecessor ‘Helicopter Ben’ and of course Alan Greenspan before them.

Bond yields throughout the world, which have plunged during years of cheap funding from the Fed and the world’s other major central banks, hit new record lows. 

Ireland’s bond yield hit a record low of 1.63%, despite Ireland still having important structural issues that have yet to be addressed and significant debt challenges.

The minutes showed Fed officials were wary about the dual threats of a stronger dollar and recent wobbles in the world economy as they desperately seek an eventual exit from record low rates.

Currency debasement continues in the U.S. and with other central banks – banks, and indeed markets appear hooked on the cocaine of ultra loose monetary policies and cheap money.

A rise in U.S. interest rates will be bearish for stocks, bonds, property and the already struggling U.S economy. Stocks already appear overvalued and ripe for a serious correction. 

The U.S. recovery is exaggerated and the health of U.S. consumers and the fundamentals of the U.S. economy remain weak. An economy that has over 55 million or nearly 20% of the population on food stamps is by its nature very weak and vulnerable.


S&P 500 – Jan 1985 to Oct 8, 2014 (Thomson Reuters)

For more than 5 years now the Fed has been ‘jawboning’ markets and threatening to rise interest rates and return to more normal monetary policies. We have consistently warned that it is important to watch what central banks do, rather than what they say – as they frequently conflict.

Indeed, even what they say can conflict and it is often dissembling and some would say designed to confuse and mislead market participants. 

Copious amounts of monetary whiskey have been downed in the global economy and yet the recovery remains weak at best. The mother of all monetary hangovers awaits us all and will likely manifest in stagflation and sharply higher inflation.

 This underlines the vital importance of having an allocation to gold in a diversified portfolio. 

Gold will maintain its purchasing power in the coming years, as it has always done throughout history. 

RECEIVE BREAKING NEWS AND UPDATES HERE

GOLDCORE MARKET UPDATE
Today’s AM fix was USD 1,227.50, EUR 961.99 and GBP 757.67 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,220.00, EUR  963.51 and GBP 758.38 per ounce.
        
Gold climbed $11.90 or 0.98% to $1,222.50 per ounce and silver rose $0.21 or 1.22% to $17.40 per ounce yesterday. 

Gold in Singapore eked out small gains from $1,223/oz to , before shaving gains to trade down 0.2 percent at $1,219.30 by 0036 GMT.


Silver in U.S. Dollars,  5 Days (Thomson Reuters) 

Yesterday, the U.S. Fed  released minutes of the Sept. 16-17 meeting, that highlighted fears that a rising dollar could impact the fragile U.S. recovery and noted the economic turmoil in Europe and Asia (see above).

More signs of the very difficult economic situation in Europe came out of Germany today where German exports slumped by 5.8% in August, their biggest fall since the height of the global financial crisis in January 2009, as the sanctions and tensions with Russia took their toll.

It is yet another sign that Europe’s largest economy is faltering amid broader euro zone weakness and crises abroad.

The Bank of England kept interest rates at a record low 0.5% today and kept printing money for bond purchases to the tune of £375 billion a year.

The risk of a new recession in the euro zone and caution from the US Federal Reserve suggested a first increase in UK borrowing costs might be delayed. 
The bank’s Monetary Policy Committee left its bank rate at 0.5%, the level at which it has sat since the worst of the financial crisis over five years ago. 

Record low interest rates in the UK and globally remain positive for gold. 

RECEIVE BREAKING NEWS AND UPDATES HERE

www.GoldCore.com




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vTXoDY GoldCore

“Stayin’ Alive” Bill Gross Speaks In His First Janus Interview: Live Webcast

Curious how Bill Gross feels in his new digs at Janus Capital (aka old digs in Newport Beach)? Curious how much money he is managing now or how he will manage it? Curious why he has a band aid under his right eye? All should be revealed in the Janus Capital live webcast going on now.

The highlights so far:

  • GROSS SAYS THE WORLD HAS TOO MUCH DEBT, A `STRUCTURAL PROBLEM’
  • GROSS SAYS IT’S NOT THE `OLD NORMAL’, IT IS THE `NEW NORMAL’
  • GROSS SAYS ANOTHER PROBLEM IS TECHNOLOGY DISPLACING WORKERS
  • GROSS SAYS GLOBAL ECONOMY IS SLOWING DOWN
  • GROSS SAYS ZERO INTEREST RATES DISTORT CAPITALISM

And:

For the rest watch below:




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vTXlrZ Tyler Durden

Gun Range Moves in Next Door to School, Boundless Hysteria Ensues

Rancho CordovaRancho Cordova, California, students are up in
arms—so to speak—about a gun range moving in next door to their
high school. The range is indoor—no stray bullets will be pelting
classroom windows—but students, teachers, and administrators all
believe the mere presence of a gun club so close to a school is
inherently dangerous.

Why? I have no earthly idea.

The community’s explanation is an insistent it just
is!
 From
cbslocal.com
:

Students from George Washington Carver High protested what is
already on its way.

“Even though it’s legal, it’s still wrong. you shouldn’t mix
schools with guns,” said student Damon Kalerkorinos.

He helped organized the protest of students against the new
shooting range being developed just about 250 feet away from their
campus.

“It’s just not safe to have a gun club so close to a
school,” he said.

Principal Allegra Allesandri says a new gun club so close is
wrong, citing weapon-free zones designed to keep schools safe.

But weapons-free zones don’t make schools any
safer than they already are; people who intend to commit violence
in schools won’t be deterred by felony weapons charges. Instead,
Allesandri and Kalerkorinos must have some unfounded belief that
mere proximity to a gun causes otherwise healthy people to lose
their minds and resort to violence. There isn’t any merit to that
argument, either.

At least city authorities recognize that since the area is zoned
as an industrial district, the gun range has every right to set up
shop next to George Washington Carver High. Case closed? Not
quite:

While the project goes forward, protesters’ concerns haven’t
fallen on deaf ears as the city announced it will likely review its
planning codes.

“We’ll be looking at the gun-related uses as well as well as
other uses and compatibilities related to schools,” he said.

For the students and neighbors against the project, the hope is
that planning codes change statewide.

It looks like the city will consider restricting future gun
ranges, if not the one next to George Washington Carver High. The
local news story spins this as a beneficial lesson in participatory
democracy for the high schoolers. True enough, I suppose. If
nothing else, they learned that when it comes to politics and
governance, think-of-the-children paranoia trumps property rights
every single time.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1t54G9b
via IFTTT

Several Cities—and the State of Colorado—Say No to the Border Police

A single tear runs down Sgt. Carter's cheek.When it comes to immigration
policy, the best-known clash between federal and lower levels of
government is the recent battle over Arizona’s infamous
SB 1070
, a law that intensified the border clampdown. And there
have been plenty of other times a state
or city has
tried to be more heavy-handed in its immigration enforcement than
the feds. But sometimes it’s the more local jurisdiction that’s
less eager to crack down, as Emily Badger
points out
in The Washington Post:

Chicago doesn’t cooperate.
Neither does
Philadelphia
. Nor Baltimore,
San
Diego
, Newark,

Milwaukee,

Miami-Dade
or Denver.

One by one, these cities—soon to be
joined by New York City
—have passed resolutions or enacted new
policies refusing to hand over immigrants detained by local police
to federal officials for deportation. The strategy, gaining
further momentum this year
 with a statewide
law in Colorado
, is one way local governments dismayed by a
broken federal immigration system have found to undermine it.

At issue are what are called “immigration detainers.” The
federal government relies on local law enforcement agencies to help
identify individuals for deportation. When local police come in
contact with suspected immigrants (for reasons
ranging from
serious offenses to traffic violations
), Immigration and
Customs Enforcement often issue a detainer, asking local jails and
prisons to hold them for 48 hours or more beyond their release to
give the feds time to decide if they want to collect and deport
them.

Badger mentions civil libertarian objections to the
imprisonments, and she also notes fears that these detentions will
undermine other sorts of police work. (People tend to be less
likely to help a homicide investigation if they’re afraid they’ll
be hauled in on immigration charges.) But the most important
incentive that she identifies might be financial: “The federal
government doesn’t reimburse local agencies for resources they
spend ‘holding’ suspected immigrants on ICE’s behalf.” Just as
governors with no ideological objection to regulation can suddenly
sound like fire-breathing libertarians when confronted with an
unfunded mandate, ICE’s orders can turn a moderate’s thoughts
toward defiance.

Bonus link: An earlier
example
of immigration-friendly federalism.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1v72EWc
via IFTTT

Koreans are getting in on the trend — renminbi deposits in Korea surge 55-fold

china financial risk Koreans are getting in on the trend    renminbi deposits in Korea surge 55 fold

October 9, 2014
Santiago, Chile

The Bank of Korea — South Korea’s central bank — released data that says South Korean domestic deposits have reached 16.19 billion Chinese renminbi in July this year, which is a 55-fold increase from the same period last year when renminbi deposits accounted for only 290 million.

According to data from South Korean banks, the proportion of foreign currency deposits held in renminbi was 0.4% at the end of 2012. That number reached 13.7% at the end of last year, while at the end of July this year the renminbi accounted for 25.9% of all foreign currency deposits in South Korea.

That’s an incredible, exponential increase.

Since Korean interest rates continue to be low and follow closely those of most Western countries, Koreans realize that if they continue to hold their money in bank accounts denominated in won, their savings are steadily and surreptitiously being diminished by inflation that’s higher then their paltry returns.

With a lack of good investment opportunities in a zero-interest rate environment and with frothy equity markets, Koreans are at least diversifying their currency exposure, with domestic capital rapidly flowing into renminbi deposits that yield much higher at around 3.25% per year.

Coupled with the continued strength of the renminbi, the attractiveness of diversifying their capital in foreign currencies, and the renminbi in particular, is clearly a firm trend among Koreans.

This is a well known scenario. Just as Europeans from countries with weaker currencies and economic prospects used to safeguard their savings by holding them in Deutschmarks and Swiss franks, we see the same trend happening today.

Individuals, companies and even governments are diversifying their currency exposure — mostly on the account of the US dollar. Renminbi denominated bonds are now being issued by businesses all over the world– heck, even McDonald’s issued a renminbi bond.

And now the UK will become the first country in the world other than China to issue renminbi denominated government debt. In fact, just this morning the UK Treasury announced that it hired Bank of China, HSBC and Standard Chartered to arrange the sale, with the bond issuance likely happening next Monday.

This follows last week’s announcement from the People’s Bank of China that renminbi and euro are now directly tradable, without the need to use the US dollar as a conduit.

The signs are clearly all there. Everyone realizes that the present system is on its way out and are taking appropriate measures. The Germans, the French, the Brits, the Canadians, the Koreans…

Don’t you think it’s time to step up and do something about it too?

The situation today looks a lot like one big game of musical chairs. Investors and “hot money” desperately looking for yield in a zero interest rate environment are pushing prices of practically all assets sky high and diversifying into markets and currencies with brighter prospects.

Make sure that you’re not the one left stranded when the music stops.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1v75SJ5
via IFTTT

Washingtonian Mag Ranks Congress: Amash ‘Lobbyists’ Worst Enemy’

Washingtonian magazine this week released
its fifteenth biennial survey on the best and worst of all the
Congresscritters roaming our great nation’s swampy capital.

The publication
takes a jab
 at them:

Despite approval ratings lower than Vladimir Putin’s, the men
and women of the 113th Congress have continued to debate,
investigate, raise funds, and campaign with ebullience. Seeing as
little if any legislation arises from their activities, it’s
apparent that if there are winners and losers, hits and misses, the
average citizen isn’t privy to the scorecard.

As such, the survey is conducted not among the great unwashed of
the American public, but among the aides of these lawmakers.

Most of the categories have a total of four spots, two for each
house. For example, the “meanest” in the Senate are 1. Barbara
Mikulski (D-Md.) and 2. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), and in the House are
1. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) and 2. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.).

However, one category, Lobbyists’ Worst Enemy, has a lone
representative: Justin Amash (R-Mich.). The libertarian-leaning
congressman, who posts on Facebook detailed explanations of all of
his votes in the House, succinctly commented on his
distinction: “Hmm.”

Conspicuously below him in the Lobbyists’ Best Friend category
were two other Republicans: 1. Eric Cantor (Va.) and 2. John
Boehner (Ohio).

Of course, Cantor’s biggest
distinction this year was
losing his primary
. He is the first sitting House majority
leader ever to manage that. Washingtonian notes that the
survey was handed out just after his loss. Cantor resigned in
August but bounced right into an investment bank gig worth $3.4
million.

As for Boehner,
rumors
have long swirled that fellow Republicans are going to
try to oust him from his Speaker position.

Some other interesting highlights from the poll include Sen.
Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who earned spots in the Rising Star, Best
Speaker, Surprise Standout (whatever that means), and Most Likely
to Run for President (with competition only from Marco Rubio
(R-Fla.).

On the other hand, presidential hopeful Ted Cruz (R-Tex.)
“earned… a variety of dubious distinctions in our survey, including
showhorse, clueless, and most disappointing—and that was just from
Republicans,” explains Washingtonian.

Read the rest of the rankings
here
.

Read about how earlier this year, an affiliate magazine,
Washingtonian Mom accidentally revealed that former Press
Secretary Jay Carney
decorates his house with communist propaganda

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/10/09/washingtonian-mag-ranks-congress-amash-l
via IFTTT

Is This Why Stocks Are Dumping?

Because humor like this clearly costs money. As always, from the one and only Dennis Gartman.

October 6:

The well-defined upward sloping trend channel continues to remain fully intact and until that trend line is broken we have to once again err upon the side of being bullish of shares generally… Support levels have held and trends from the lower left to the upper right obtain. One may wish to join the bearish camp, but one would be wrong.

Stocks suffer biggest drop in 2 months shortly thereafter.

October 8:

If the Russell were to hold today and turn higher, then we might very seriously consider covering a portion of our derivatives; otherwise, we shall sit tight, remaining market neutral and fearing that indeed the bear market has begun and that rallies henceforth are to be sold rather than weakness bought.

Stocks surge by most in years shortly thereafter.

And then, first thing today:

Down 35 points one day; up 35 points the next! The Bulls were taken out and shot Tuesday; the Bears were shot yesterday and all we know for certain is that the upward sloping trend still holds and that weakness is to be bought with the Fed still behind the market.

And this too:

NEW RECOMMENDATION: We wish to return to the trade we were once involved in for a rather long while: long of the English speaking currencies/short of the Yen and we shall do so upon receipt of this commentary, buying US dollars, Canadian dollars, Aussie dollars, New Zealand dollars and Sterling relative to the Yen with two units of the latter vs. the proper dollar weighted sum of the other currencies. We shall have a stop on the trade in tomorrow’s TGL, but for now a loss of 1% would be sufficiently large.

It sure would, and with the Yen in dollar terms jumping to the highest level since September 16 this morning, the stop would have certainly been hit.

But the punchline:

Finally for those who care, we are up 7.1%, year-to-date, in our retirement funds here at TGL as of last night’s close.

Because virtually momentum trading one’s 401(k) is the new killing it.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uG85cY Tyler Durden

Saxobank CIO On The End Of US Dominance

Authored by Steen Jakobsen, CIO Saxobank, via TradingFloor.com,

  • Tensions and volatility inevitable as world redefines itself
  • China and Russia forming powerful anti-US alliance
  • Potential for geopolitics to become core to risk assessment/return

World Order is the title of the latest book by Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, and it's riveting stuff. Kissinger draws on his deep experience of decades of shaping foreign policy and observing the complex interactions between nations and ideologies to develop a timely analysis of the world and where it's heading.

Some of Kissinger's central themes are drawn out in an interview with Charlie Rose in Bloomberg Businessweek.

A key concept is that the world goes through frequent cycles of redefinition and these periods mean increased tensions and higher volatility. China and Russia are now forming a strong anti-US and anti-dollar alliance. This alliance is expanding in magnitude and impact as China increases its presence not only in Africa but also in Club Med via infrastructure investments.

The new world order means less US dominance, a gradual weakening of reserve currency advantages and trade areas away from from Europe and the US. Add to this the much-needed fight against radical Islamism and we have a potential for geopolitical risk finally becoming part of risk assessment and return.

Kissinger says that the current era is one of the most chaotic periods of which he is aware. Every part of the world is redefining itself, some internally—like China, and some externally.

"The European system hasn’t dominated the world; it’s been abandoned in Europe. And the US is moving into a new period in which the dominance enjoyed in the immediate postwar period economically is no longer there. On the other hand, we are still the central element in creating a new order. Without our participation, it’s difficult to see how a new system can emerge in most parts of the world."

That's the essence of Kissinger's argument as presented in Businessweek but I would encourage you to read both the interview and, of course, the book itself.

Finally, let me add a chart from a recent presentation of mine:

End of US Supremacy?

 

*  *  *

Which looks a lot like the one we presented here (via Deutsche Bank) where we concluded:

The geopolitical consequences of the diminishment of US global dominance

Each of these events has shown America’s unwillingness to take strong foreign policy action and certainly underlined its unwillingness to use force. America’s allies and enemies have looked on and taken note. America’s geopolitical multiplier has declined even as its relative economic strength has waned and the US has slipped backwards towards the rest of the pack of major world powers in terms of relative geopolitical power.

Throughout this piece we have looked to see what we can learn from history in trying to understand changes in the level of structural geopolitical tension in the world. We have in general argued that the broad sweep of world history suggests that the major driver of significant structural change in global levels of geopolitical tension has been the relative rise and fall of the world’s leading power. We have also suggested a number of important caveats to this view – chiefly that a dominant superpower only provides for structurally lower geopolitical tensions when it is itself internally stable. We have also sought to distinguish between a nation being an “economic” superpower (which we can broadly measure directly) and being a genuine “geopolitical” superpower (which we can’t). On this subject we have hypothesised that the level of a nations geopolitical power can roughly be estimated multiplying its relative economic power by a “geopolitical multiplier” which reflects that nations ability to amass and project force, its willingness to intervene in the affairs of the world and the extent of its “soft power”.

Given this analysis it strikes us that today we are in the midst of an extremely rare historical event – the relative decline of a world superpower. US global geopolitical dominance is on the wane – driven on the one hand by the historic rise of China from its disproportionate lows and on the other to a host of internal US issues, from a crisis of American confidence in the core of the US economic model to general war weariness. This is not to say that America’s position in the global system is on the brink of collapse. Far from it. The US will remain the greater of just two great powers for the foreseeable future as its “geopolitical multiplier”, boosted by its deeply embedded soft power and continuing commitment to the “free world” order, allows it to outperform its relative economic power. As America’s current Defence Secretary, Chuck Hagel, said earlier this year, “We (the USA) do not engage in the world because we are a great nation. Rather, we are a great nation because we engage in the world.” Nevertheless the US is losing its place as the sole dominant geopolitical superpower and history suggests that during such shifts geopolitical tensions structurally increase. If this analysis is correct then the rise in the past five years, and most notably in the past year, of global geopolitical tensions may well prove not temporary but structural to the current world system and the world may continue to experience more frequent, longer lasting and more far reaching geopolitical stresses than it has in at least two decades. If this is indeed the case then markets might have to price in a higher degree of geopolitical risk in the years ahead.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uG82ht Tyler Durden

List of 13 Creepiest Clowns Inexplicably Leaves Out Joe Biden, Other Pols

To capitalize on the season premiere of
American Horror Story, People mag has
assembled a list of “13
of the Creepiest Clowns in Pop Culture History
.”

It’s a sharp list and many of your faves are almost certainly
there, from the original Ronald McDonald (created by star
weatherman Willard Scott) to serial killer and
Rosalynn Carter photo op
John Wayne Gacy to Captain Spaulding
from Rob Zombie’s films.

Notably missing, however, are all the politicians who should
fill out the list. I’ll start with the most clownish (and eminent)
of all clown-show pols: Vice-President Joe Biden,
who is currently managing to alienate
virtually every country
on the planet from the United States. Poland, Turkey, Saudi Arabia,
U.A.E., yeah, Biden’s hit that and more.

Back in 2009—that’s like 50 years ago in Biden-Gaffe
Years—Reason TV saluted Joe Biden, Real Man of Political
Genius:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1ybMADR
via IFTTT

A Reversion to the Mean is Coming…

The stock market is no longer cheap.

 

The single best predictor of stock market performance is the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio or CAPE ratio. Most investors price a company based on its current Price to Earnings or P/E ratio. Essentially what you’re doing is comparing the price of the company today to its ability to produce earnings (cash).

 

However, corporate earnings are heavily influenced by the business cycle.

 

Typically the US experiences a boom and bust once every ten years or so. As such, companies will naturally have higher P/E’s at some points and lower P/E’s at other. This is based solely on the business cycle and nothing else.

 

CAPE adjusts for this by measuring the price of stocks against the average of ten years’ worth of earnings, adjusted for inflation. By doing this, it presents you with a clearer, more objective picture of a company’s ability to produce cash in any economic environment.

 

We have mentioned before that CAPE is the single most important metric for long-term investors. I wasn’t saying that for impact.

 

Based on a study completed Vanguard, CAPE was the single best metric for measuring future stock returns. Indeed, CAPE outperformed

 

1.     P/E ratios

2.     Government Debt/ GDP

3.     Dividend yield

4.     The Fed Model,

 

…and many other metrics used by investors to predict market value.

 

So what is CAPE telling us today?

 

The S&P 500 is currently at a CAPE of over 26.

 

 

The S&P 500 has only been at this level or higher a handful of times in the last 100 years. All of them have coincided with major market peaks.

 

This is not to say that the market will crash tomorrow. However, there are considerable signs that the market is in trouble.

 

Those of you who have been reading us for some time know that we prefer to use nominal GDP as a measurement of GDP growth in the US.

 

The reason for this is that all “adjusted” GDP data involves a “deflator” metric that is meant to adjust for inflation. The Feds often use an inflation adjustment that is even lower than their official Consumer Price Index metric (which is already massaged to downplay inflation) in order to make GDP growth look greater.

 

Consider this simple example. Let’s say that the US GDP grew by 10% last year. Now let’s say that inflation also grew by 10%. In this scenario, real inflation adjusted GDP growth was ZERO. However, announcing ZERO GDP growth is a major problem politically. So what do the Feds do? They claim that inflation was just 8%, and BOOM you’ve got 2% GDP growth announced for a year in which real GDP growth was actually zero.

 

By using nominal GDP measures, you remove the Feds’ phony deflator metric. With that in mind, consider the year over year change in nominal GDP that has occurred.

 

 

As you can see, we’ve broken below four, the reading that has been triggered at every recession in the last 30 years.

 

The primary drivers of asset prices are the economy and corporate earnings. The above chart shows that the US is on the brink of a recession. With that in mind, consider that corporate profits are at all time highs.

 

Not only that, but corporate profits, as a percentage of GDP are at all-time highs. Never before in history have corporations made so much money relative to the US economy. This trend is not likely to continue.

 

 

So, we have a weak economy, record profits (mostly from cutting payroll by firing people) and record profits as a percentage of GDP. The simplest interpretation of this is that there will be a reversion to the mean at some point.

 

So… we’ve got:

 

1)   Stocks overpriced based on the most predictive metric out there (the CAPE).

2)   The US economy at or near recession territory.

3)   Corporate profits at record highs.

4)   Corporate profits as a percentage of GDP at record highs.

 

The market is primed to drop. Now is the time to prepare.

 

If you’ve yet to take action to prepare for the second round of the financial crisis, we offer a FREE investment report Financial Crisis "Round Two" Survival Guide that outlines easy, simple to follow strategies you can use to not only protect your portfolio from a market downturn, but actually produce profits.

 

You can pick up a FREE copy at:

 

http://ift.tt/1rPiWR3

 

 

Best Regards

 

Graham Summers

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1CY01Hl Phoenix Capital Research