Leaked Documents Expose the TTIP Trade Deal as a Subversive Imperial Scam

Screen Shot 2016-03-18 at 2.40.54 PM

At least 150,000 people marched in Berlin on Saturday in protest against a planned free trade deal between Europe and the United States that they say is anti-democratic and will lower food safety, labor and environmental standards.

Organizers – an alliance of environmental groups, charities and opposition parties – said 250,000 people had taken part in the rally against free trade deals with both the United States and Canada, far more than they had anticipated.

Opposition to the so-called Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has risen over the past year in Germany, with critics fearing the pact will hand too much power to big multinationals at the expense of consumers and workers.

– From the post: Merkel “Surprised” as Hundreds of Thousands March in Berlin Against TTIP “Corporate Dictatorship”

The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is under total assault here in these United States, as the general public has become aware that these fake trade deals are merely oppressive power grabs written by lobbyists to benefit multinational corporations at the expense of the general public.

Less well known to the American public is a similar scam targeting Europe, known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Recently leaked documents have highlighted its profound dangers.

The Independent reports:

The European Commission will be obliged to consult with US authorities before adopting new legislative proposals following passage of a controversial series of trade negotiations being carried out mostly in secret.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/21zLGv4
via IFTTT

Romney Urges Cruz Vote, Paris Suspect Captured, Funny Common Core Math: P.M. Links

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1Mfu9qj
via IFTTT

Fed Sparks “QE Trade” As Stocks, Bonds, Gold Soar

What happens next?

 

Well it's been another week… As Goldman said this was the 4th most dovish Fed surprise since 2008

Surprises at FOMC meetings with the “dot plot” in the Summary of Economic Projections have on average been almost twice the size of pre-crisis norms.

Which enabled the 5th weekly S&P rise in a row – just like into the Nov 2015 highs…(before it all collapsed) – Trannies up 5% on the week!!

Perfect close:

  • S&P 2049.46
  • Dow 17,599.42

Trannies are up 9 weeks in a row – and this was the biggest week since the Bullard Bounce in Oct 2014.

Financials are up 5 weeks in a row for the first time since Sept 2014 right before plunging only to be saved by Bullard…

 

But we just wonder…

 

Post-Fed, Silver soared but gold was coincidentally marked down the last 2 days to ensure it did not make stocks look terrible and signal policy error…

 

Most-Shorted stocks were monkey-hammered higher after The Fed – back to unch ish on the week…

 

Note that the "weakest momo" stocks have soared in this rally…

 

Crushing market-neutral funds once again… the worst Quarter for Market-Neutral funds since Q3 2011

 

Treasury yields tumbled post-Fed with a yuuge 17bps plunge in 2Y Yields…(the biggest 2Y yield drop since Bullard Oct 2014)

 

The USD Index tumbled on the week – driven by The Fed and follow through in Asia – but notably stable again now for the last 24-36 hours..

 

This is the lowest weekly close in 5 months… and USD is down 3% YoY

 

The entire week for commodities pivoted around The Fed, with everything higher…

 

Crude managed its 5th weekly rise in a row, but things fell apart a little into the week's close (April back below $40)…

 

And finally, as a reminder – You Are Here…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pRfkQL Tyler Durden

This ‘Dash-For-Trash’ Rally Has Been Led By “Garbage”… Literally

While “most shorted” stocks have ripped higher in the last few weeks, and “weak balance sheet” stocks have soared, the real winner in this “dash for trash” is… garbage!!

It appears investors can’t get enough of “Waste & Disposal” stocks…

h/t @jlyonsfundmgmnt

The last time this index surged so far so fast was Oct 2011… and it fell 13% in the following month.

And we note that while the initial momentum of this central-bank-engineered rally was a yuuge shorts squeeze, the last two weeks have seen “Most Shorted” stocks go nowhere…

 

So the last two weeks of Fed, BoJ, and ECB action failed to lift the real ‘trash’ and instead pushed investors into defensive stocks… what next?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pRfibG Tyler Durden

SEC Says Amazon Must Allow Vote on ‘Gender Pay Gap’ Even If No One’s Quite Sure What the Term Means

Should shareholders have a say in how companies report on their “gender pay gaps?” The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) says yes, rejecting a request from Amazon.com to avoid shareholder voting on a pay-gap proposal that the tech company calls “vague and misleading.”

The pay-gap proposal comes via Arjuna Capital, an arm of the investment firm Baldwin Brothers, on behalf of Amazon shareholders Michael and Margherita Baldwin. In 2015, Arjuna asked Amazon and eight other tech companies to hold shareholder votes on whether the companies should report “the percentage pay gap between male and female employees, policies to address that gap, and quantitative reduction targets.”

“It’s not simply a social justice issue,” said Natasha Lamb, director of shareholder engagement at Arjuna, to Reuters. “It’s an issue that affects performance, affects the company’s ability to attract and retain top talent.”

The Arjuna proposal explains that “the gender pay gap is defined as the difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development” (OECD).

But Amazon sought permission from the SEC to omit the proposal from shareholder voting. In a January letter, it complained that the proposal offered no instruction on how to calculate the pay gap and claimed that “neither shareholders nor [Amazon] can determine what action the Proposal requires, rendering the Proposal impermissibly vague and misleading.” Arjuna’s letter referenced the OECD definition, but OECD offers multiple ways of calculating the gender pay gap. 

OECD’s “definitions and sources” file “contains a list of the 43 definitions of ‘earnings’ OECD ‘used for the calculation of the gender pay gap in,'” noted Amazon. “The Proposal gives no indication of how earnings should be calculated for purposes of the requested report. Among other things, the Proposal makes no mention of whether the gender pay gap is calculated based on median earnings or mean average earnings, whether earnings are calculated based only on full-time employees or full-time/full year employees, or whether part-time employees should be included (and if so, whether their earnings should be converted to a full-time equivalent basis). Finally, the Proposal gives no indication of which of the various definitions of earnings used by the OECD is to be applied.”

“Different calculation methods for determining ‘earnings’ could show significantly different results,” it continued. “Thus, by referring to a third-party standard for reporting on the gender pay gap, a central and critical aspect of the Proposal, but failing to adequately describe the standard, and in fact misleadingly suggesting that there is a single, clearly understood OECD standard, the Proposal is impermissibly vague and misleading.”

Arjuna responded that “the current proposal does not incorrectly describe any standards because it does not point to any set of standards to implement the proposal.” The gender pay gap, “defined or not, is a commonly understood and significant social policy issue and a topic on which shareholder are equip to weigh in,” it argued to the SEC. “The [OECD] definition is simply included to prevent an argument by the Company that the Proposal is vague or indefinite.”

In a March 15 response, the SEC told Amazon that it may not omit the proposal from proxy materials and a shareholder vote. SEC Attorney-Adviser Ryan J. Adams stated that the SEC was “unable to conclude that the proposal is so inherently vague or indefinite that neither the shareholders voting on the proposal, nor the company in implementing the proposal, would be able to determine with any reasonable certainty exactly what actions or measures the proposal requires.” 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1LvzUQL
via IFTTT

FBI Warns About Car Hacking. Encryption Security Helps Prevent That.

KITTWhile FBI prepares for a court hearing next week to try to force Apple to help it break into the work phone of San Bernardino, California, terrorist Syed Farook, the agency also wants you to pay attention to your cybersecurity to protect yourself from hackers attempting to commandeer your car.

This somewhat schizophrenic argument (all tech experts seem to agree that what the FBI is asking for in San Bernardino would weaken everybody’s data security) is a result of increasing concerns that our highly computerized automobiles are susceptible to hackers. As we approach a future of self-driving automobiles, it is obviously a risk that cannot be ignored. Wired last year famously had a couple of guys hack into and shut down the transmission of a vehicle while it was traveling down the highway.

So the FBI, the Department of Transportation, and the National Highway Transportation and Security Association have put out a press release and resource page warning consumers about how important cybersecurity is for your vehicles.

Wired takes note of the irony of the FBI calling for careful protection on security and access to digital tools on the one hand while going to the courts to mandate the opposite:

The announcement also notes that drivers should be careful about offering physical access to their vehicles to strangers. “In much the same way as you would not leave your personal computer or smartphone unlocked, in an unsecure location, or with someone you don’t trust, it is important that you maintain awareness of those who may have access to your vehicle,” the announcement reads. (If only the FBI felt quite so strongly about keeping intruders out of your iPhone.) [Emphasis added]

Mind you, the government is insisting on arguing that ordering that Apple help make a single phone more vulnerable to hacking is an isolated request that cannot possibly get out of hand. But that seems to be an argument presented solely by government representatives. Everybody in the tech industry seems to be lining up behind Apple.

Read more about car hacking here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/259By0B
via IFTTT

Caught On Tape: Helicopter Money Arrives As Brink’s Truck Dumps $20s On Highway

As it becomes ever more clear that ZIRP and NIRP are not only entirely inadequate when it comes to reviving global growth and trade, but in fact may be counterproductive for a number of reasons, the world is looking for other answers.

Perhaps the most oft-repeated suggestion is “helicopter money.” One might fairly say that helicopter money comes in different versions. There is, for instance, “version 1”, which involves monetizing government debt in the secondary market with a bank intermediary (QE). Then there’s what we might call “version 2”, which might entail, say, monetizing government debt in the primary market and using the proceeds to fund infrastructure projects. And how about “version 3,” which might involve monetizing government debt in the primary market and sending everyone a check in the mail. Finally, we can envision “version 4” which is when Janet Yellen rents a helicopter and literally drops money from the sky.

Well on Friday, we got footage of the rarely seen “version 5,” which is also known by its more accurate moniker, “truck money.” This is when Brink’s armored vehicles drive down the highway and dump cash onto the road. Here to explain is CBS2 New York:

“While police say there were many people who stopped and helped police pick up the money, there may have been a few who pocketed some bills,” CBS speculates. 

Watch next month’s consumer spending data for an early read on whether the coming experiment with helicopter money will work to juice the economy.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/259yqBO Tyler Durden

Tampa City Council Votes to Decriminalize Possession of Small Amounts of Marijuana

The city council in Tampa voted 5-1 to change possession of up to 20 grams (less than 3/4 of an ounce) of marijuana from a misdemeanor to a citable offense—with penalties starting at $75 and going up to $300 by the third offense.

Some critics of the move at last night’s meeting wanted to keep possession a misdemeanor for repeat offenders. “Arrest is not the end of the world,” one mother said, according to NBC 4 in Tampa. She said her daughter was sent to drug court. “When somebody is using a substance that is addictive and can be abused, just paying a fine is not going to help them,” she told the council.

Drug courts have in recent years become one way for drug warriors to pre-empt legalization efforts. Anything, narcotic or otherwise, can be abused and addictive, but it’s not the government’s role to put people in cages or otherwise trap them in the legal system merely for their personal choices.

Even a $75 fine, let alone a $300 fine, can end up costing a lot more, up to and including people’s freedom. The fines associated with non-arrestable offenses help drive policies of policing as revenue generation—adding marijuana to that isn’t useful, and neither are drug courts, which plug into the same system and often include similar fines and other traps.

“I don’t feel what we did today is different than what a lot of cities are doing and as a country as we’re moving nationally,” Councilwoman Lisa Montelione (District 7) said last night.

In Philadelphia, possession of up to 30 grams yields a $25—smoking in public is $100. Other cities and towns around the country have voted to try to decriminalize or legalize marijuana in their jurisdictions. Meanwhile, more than 17 million Americans live in states where recreational marijuana use has been legalized, albeit still regulated.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1pR9YFc
via IFTTT

Collapsing Contango Means Tankers Full Of Oil Such As This One, Will Soon Have To Unload Their Cargo

One week ago we showed something the oil bulls did not expect: oil producer hedging had already started. 

As a trader cited by Reuters said “Brent’s flattening contango since January comes as many producers want to cash in immediately on recent price rises. They’ve been heavily selling 2017/2018 and beyond, and it shows that they don’t quite trust the higher spot prices yet.”

 

He further explained that “This means that even the producers don’t really expecting a strong price rally until well into 2017 or later,” and Reuters added that the companies that explore for oil and pump it out of the ground have been locking in price gains by selling off future output as a financial hedge, pulling down prices for those contracts.

We will have more to say on the topic of producer oil hedging, and specifically how they do it, in a subsequent post but for now it is worth noting that since last week the contango has flattened further as the spot price rose while the long end declined, suggesting even more hedging has taken place in recent days.

 

One analyst who notes this trend, is Saxo Bank’s Ole Hansen who observes that the rally in oil prices to 3 month highs has coincided with narrowing contangos that alter storage economics and threaten oil flooding back into the market. The reason for this is that storing oil, either on the ground or on ships, becomes less profitable the greater the flattening in the contango.

“As we’ve seen both Brent and WTI climb above $40 we have also seen the contango collapse.”

As examples, Bloomberg observes the WTI M1-M2 contango narrowing to earlier $1.25 today, the tightest since Jan. 22; while the WTI M1-M3 contango has reaches just $2.21, or the smallest in two months.

The long-end has seen even sharper moves with the WTI M1-M13 contango contracting 86c to close at $4.97 yesterday, compared to $6.64 Tuesday.

Hansen also added what we warned about two weeks ago, namely that $40-plus oil “could also stop the production slowdown, which with the weakness of the dollar has been the main driver for oil prices,” posing another downside risk.

Hansen adds that “If we rally too high the contango will collapse further and the storage economics reduce – that could trigger storage in tanks to be reduced,” increasing supply and putting pressure back on crude prices. Recall that several producers made it clear that once oil rises above $40, the pumping will resume, although not all. Today Bank of America laid out a useful chart showing the incremental production sensitivity, with the delta between $40 and $50 being critical.

But back to the contango, about which Hansen warned that “if we rally too high the contango will collapse further and the storage economics reduce — that could trigger storage in tanks to be reduced,” increasing supply and putting pressure back on crude prices.

What does this mean? One example is the tanker Distya Akula shown below.

 

As Bloomberg writes, the Akula is a 1 million bbl-carrying Suezmax, currently loaded with cargo, which is not only not going anywhere, but which is now waiting near the southern entrance of Egypt’s Suez Canal to 22 days.

The ship, with cargo on board, left Kharg Island, Iran’s biggest crude-export terminal, in early February, and reached its present location on Feb. 24 or one month ago.  Elektrans, the ship’s joint owner, said Wednesday that the tanker’s cargo is probably destined for buyer in Mediterraneanm but didn’t know which because vessel is on long-term charter to another company.

In other words, the ship is hoping that prices rebound high enough to where a buyer will be found. For now, there is no buyer, and the bigger the contango drop, the less profitable such storage will be, forcing companies to unload tanker cargos and to flood the market with tens of millions of currently “inert” inventory.

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/259uMba Tyler Durden

Did Jim Bullard Just Signal “Sell”?

Flip-flopping Fed President Jim Bullard has done it again. Having helped spark the recent ramp in mid-Feb with his uber-dovish comments that “tightening was unwise,” he now expresses his hawkish opinion – with stocks back nearer record highs – that it would be “prudent policy to edge rates toward normal levels.” Is that a “sell’?

 

 

Markets don’t care for now – whatever he says, it’s a buy!


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Lvq4OL Tyler Durden