Liberty Links 12/17/16

Must Reads

Goldman Sachs Continues to Run America Under Trump (Depressing, but accurate, The Intercept)

How Clinton Lost Michigan — and Blew the Election (Politico)

Sean Hannity Interviews Julian Assange (YouTube)

Hillary and Hypocritical Democrats Aren’t Defending American Democracy from Foreign Meddling, They Are a Clear and Present Danger to It (The Daily Mail)

Senate Quietly Passes The “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” (Zerohedge)

Mark Thompson: Hyper-Partisanship and the Changing Nature of News (The NYT CEO is dangerously full of it, The New York Times)

Interview with Tucker Carlson (Very good, Politico)

Facebook is Going to Use Snopes and Other Fact Checkers to Combat and Bury Fake News (Unbelievably reckless move by Facebook, Business Insider)

The Rise of the Alt-Center (Hillary loyalists have gone totally insane, Slate)

Hillary Clinton Lost. Get Over It And Stop Blaming Russia, WikiLeaks And ‘Fake’ News (The Huffington Post)

It’s Beginning to Smell a Lot Like Totalitarianism, and I Don’t Mean Russia (New Eastern Outlook)

U.S. Politics

See More Links »

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2gWPiKl
via IFTTT

Trump Picks Staunch Fiscal Conservative Mulvaney As Budget Director

Hinting of a substantial clampdown on government spending over the next four years, this morning President-elect Trump announced the selection of South Carolina Rep. Mick Mulvaney to be his first budget director Saturday morning, a nomination which would put a “staunch fiscal conservative” in charge of managing the federal budget and the logistics of government affairs.

As director of the Office of the Management and Budget, replacing Obama appointee Shaun Donovan, Mulvaney would have broad responsibility for government operations, and for avoiding the government shutdowns that the Freedom Caucus countenanced several times.

The move, which will raise eyebrows among those who expect an unprecedented fiscal expansion under Trump, pits Mulvaney, a true fiscal conservative, in charge of government spending, following repeated alarms about the long-term trajectory of the debt, even as annual deficits have fallen in recent years despite a recent sharp spike during the final months of the Obama administration. He has criticized the use of special war funds to get around caps on defense spending and in past years has suggested that tax increases might be necessary to stabilize the debt, a stance anathema to many conservatives.

Mulvaney’s selection points to a strategy by Trump to cut government where he can. The president-elect in recent days has, for example, railed against what he has labeled a far too expensive new version of the Air Force One aircraft he will fly that Boeing is supposed to build. In a statement announcing his selection, Trump called Mulvaney a strong voice in Congress for “reining in out-of-control spending, fighting government waste and enacting tax policies that will allow working Americans to thrive.”

* * *

A graduate of Georgetown University with a law degree from the University of North Carolina, Mulvaney served in the state legislature after a brief legal career and a stint in his family’s homebuilding business. Mulvaney is of Irish descent, and once caused a minor stir in Ireland when Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny attended a fundraiser of his held at an Irish pub in D.C. just before St. Patrick’s Day.

The announcement of the nomination, which will require Senate confirmation, was made as Trump began his holiday vacation at Mar-a-Lago, his oceanfront club in Florida, around the same time that president Obama arrived in Hawaii for his final vacation as president.

Mulvaney, 49, was an outspoken critic of John Boehner, and was one of the conservatives credited with forcing the former House Speaker to resign in fall 2015 rather than bow to the party’s Freedom Caucus flank and lead the House into another government shutdown. Mulvaney, who came to office as part of the 2010 Tea Party wave, has frequently allied himself with the most conservative members of the House and co-founded the House Freedom Caucus that has frequently bucked Republican leadership on spending bills, the Washington Examiner reports.

“He’s a tremendous talent, especially when it comes to numbers and budgets,” Trump said in a statement Friday night, adding on Saturday morning that “we are going to do great things for the American people with Mick Mulvaney leading the Office of Management and Budget. Right now we are nearly $20 trillion in debt, but Mick is a very high-energy leader with deep convictions for how to responsibly manage our nation’s finances and save our country from drowning in red ink. With Mick at the head of OMB, my administration is going to make smart choices about America’s budget, bring new accountability to our federal government, and renew the American taxpayer’s trust in how their money is spent.”

Mulvaney responded that “it is a great honor to be appointed Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The Trump administration will restore budgetary and fiscal sanity back in Washington after eight years of an out-of-control, tax and spend financial agenda, and will work with Congress to create policies that will be friendly to American workers and businesses. Each day, families across our nation make disciplined choices about how to spend their hard earned money, and the federal government should exercise the same discretion that hardworking Americans do every day.”

In a move that could prove portentous under the Trump administration, Mulvaney last year introduced legislation that would allow nationalized mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be recapitalized and eventually leave the government’s control. The conservative head of the House Financial Services Committee that Mulvaney served on, Texas Rep. Jeb Hensarling, instead has advanced legislation that would reform the housing finance system and shutter Fannie and Freddie. Yet Mulvaney’s approach may be favored in the Trump administration: Trump’s selection for treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, endorsed re-privatizing the two mortgage businesses in some of his first comments as Trump’s appointment.

Perhaps more notable is that in 2011, Mick Mulvaney was pushing for “Cut, Cap and Balance” in return for a debt limit hike, and voted “no” on the deal, while dismissing warnings of a US default.

Absent a significant change to Mulvaney’s outlook on US spending, it is difficult to reconcile this appointment, with the market’s increasingly conventional view of Trump as an “out of control” spender, and furthermore may undermine the perception that $1 trillion in debt-funded fiscal stimulus is imminent. It will also put Trump’s decision to slash corporate taxes without a revenue offset under the microscope of one of the most frugal fiscal conservatives in government. However, like with most things the market has taken for granted under Trump, details of the president-elect’s spending plans have yet to be formalized.

via http://ift.tt/2gMM9cL Tyler Durden

Phoenix Unlikely To Rise From Democratic Party’s Ashes

Authored by Ben Tanosborn,

After almost four decades of disregard for a decomposing cadaver, party progressives appear ready to cremate the Democratic Party’s corpse and give it a requiem mass doubtful that their minority status will allow them to revive the party.  Not the majority, however, who seem hopeful for a Lazarus’ resuscitation without a Jesus in their midst; a legion of career politicians tending to their own personal needs.  Little wonder that Democratic members in Congress quickly have declared the Revolution brought in by Bernie Sanders, and represented in the progressive platform enacted in the summer, as dead on arrival, allowing for the De-evolution to continue under the leadership of two old generals: Nancy Pelosi (House) and Charles Schumer (Senate).   

A mummified party led first by Bill Clinton and later by Barack Obama did fool a lion’s share of the population into thinking the Democratic Ass was alive and kicking, but this 2016 tell-tale presidential election has finally unfolded to tell the truth in contemporary American politics.  The myth of a diverse but united Democratic Party has held as truth up to and including Obama’s presidency; however, Hillary Clinton, lacking the manifest and cunning scoundrelism of husband Bill, just couldn’t keep the raggedy and  diverse troops marching in step without a single unifying drummer.

Although the Democratic Party continued to present itself as a big tent accommodating and giving shelter to diversity, be it large racial/ethnic minorities, or myriad other single- issue contingents, it never superimposed a common goal for all, a single banner to take to battle.  Unlike in other memorable time – Bill Clinton’s presidential run in1992 – when James Carville’s “The economy, stupid!” was coined as a campaign battle cry to defeat Bush Senior, Hillary Clinton seemed to think she could defeat Trump without one. And Sanders’ gift to her of a modified version of that same slogan was not adopted when it could have won the day; an effective version absent of criticism for Obama’s handling of the economy.

It was the power-elite in the Democratic Party that force-exiled too many poor white Democrats into joining Trump’s bigopats.  And an election that Democrats should have won by 10-15 million votes ended in an Electoral College fratricidal defeat… taking place in Rust Belt states where insurgent Democrats broke party ranks.

Rolling Stone’s Jann Wenner’s interview with President Obama on November 9 the day after the presidential election-cataclysm provides us with a sober reality of the how and why of the Democratic Party’s demise in American politics: the alternating in governing by Tweedledee-Democrats and Tweedledum-Republicans to be no more.

In the interview, Barack Obama stated that when he turns over the keys of the federal government to Donald Trump, he (Obama) can claim “without equivocation” that the country is a lot better off, indicating the economy is stronger, the federal government works better, and the US standing in the world is higher.

Well, Mr. President, here’s where your “equivocation” takes place.  The economy is stronger, true, but the benefits have been harvested by an upper few, with inequality between haves and have-not not just simply increasing but accelerating during his two terms in office.  As for the federal government working better, that’s challengeable and could be logically refuted depending on the subjects involved in the relationship. And the claim of a better US standing in the world is just as debatable, perhaps more so than the prior claim.  If anything, critics of Obama’s foreign policy could rightfully claim that improvement in global relations needs to be measured not by how the US is viewed by its allies and friends, but by its peaceful progress with adversaries and competitors.  US’ deterioration in relations with Russia, originating in a profoundly neoconservative State Department, coupled with an ever-deteriorating situation in the Middle-East, weigh heavily on an overall failed foreign policy.  Obviously, Obama’s Nobel Peace prize in 2009 was ridiculously premature, perhaps presented to him as prepaid expectations and not for a few months in office without tangible accomplishments.

One would have to be unrealistically optimistic to believe in a possible resurgence of the Democratic Party; not unless immediately taken over by a strong, dedicated progressive wing.  And that has been quickly put to rest with Pelosi and Schumer taking the reins in Congress.   For Progressivism to take root in America once again, as it did within the Democratic Party of the 1930’s, it will have to be seeded, and allowed to germinate and grow in a field of its own… and not just within the confines of a party that is nothing but a milder version of the predatory capitalism represented by the Republican Party.

 

via http://ift.tt/2i0DIeR Tyler Durden

Tucker Carlson Takes on Celebrity Who Wants Electors to Vote Against Trump

The sense of entitlement, the overwhelming pomposity of Mike Farrell imbues this video like a metastasized malignancy. Out with democracy and in with aristocratic rule, where the enlightened shall, forthwith, decide the leaders of our great nation. All of the learned men shall preside over the working class. Glasses brimming with the very best champagne will be distributed, liberally, as these fine men of letters decide our next leader.

The electors and their Hollywood fan club, energized by democratically funded super PACs, seek to undo the elections of 2016 — because of Donald J. Trump, a man who paid over $400,000 in taxes for his Mar-a-Lago estate this year, is ‘unqualified’ to be President. His actions, according to Farrell and others, is ‘scary’; therefore, a leader of extreme political substance, deep from within the crevasses of the DC swap, shall replace him — hopefully continuing onerous policies of a neocon nature. A globalist scourge, with aims to hollow out and rot America from within, will continue to cast its dark shadows over this nation until her phantom pallor is no longer ambiguous — pushing forth divisive policies and social re-engineering policies, and of course war — maybe even with Russia — in order to crack the country asunder.

Heretofore, the will of the people was sufficient. But the rise of Trump is a national emergency. Something should be done, according to Mike Farrell and his cadre of autocrat loving actors — who’ve taken to the patriotic task of informing the people of their grave mistake.

Who needs enemies with friends like Mike?

 

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com

via http://ift.tt/2hKsRX3 The_Real_Fly

Duterte: “Bye Bye America, We Don’t Need Your Money, China Said They Will Provide”

While there have been signs of a recent thawing in the diplomatic freeze between the Philippines and the US, after president Rodrigo Duterte – who has repeatedly called president Obama “son of a whore” – congratulated Donald Trump on his election, and moved to bury the hatchet with Washington last week, when he said “I would like to congratulate President Trump. Long live!” adding “now we’re here, I don’t want to … fight because Trump is already there”, relations appeared to take a turn for the worse again overnight when Duterte told the US on Saturday to prepare for repeal of an agreement on deployment of troops and equipment for exercises, declaring “bye-bye America”, and we don’t need your money.

Duterte’s beef with the US has been largely with the Obama administration, which has criticized the Philippines president over reports of extra-judicial killings in his campaign against drugs. Addressing Washington, Duterte said “we do not need you” after arriving from visits to Cambodia and Singapore. “Prepare to leave the Philippines. Prepare for the eventual repeal or abrogation of the VFA.


“I understand that we have been stricken out of the Millennium Challenge. Well, 
good, I welcome it,”
Duterte speaking with apparent sarcasm. | AP Photo

The Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA), signed in 1998, accorded legal status to thousands of U.S. troops who were rotated in the country for military exercises and humanitarian assistance operations.

The irritable leader was visibly upset and vented his anger on Washington because of a decision by the Millennium Challenge Corp (MCC) board to defer vote on the re-selection of Manila for compact development due to human rights issues.

“I understand that we have been stricken out of the Millennium Challenge. Well, good, I welcome it,” Duterte said with apparent sarcasm. “We can survive without American money,” he said.

“But you know, America, you might also be put to notice. Prepare to leave the Philippines, prepare for the eventual repeal or the abrogation of the Visiting Forces Agreement,” he said, referring to a 1998 accord that governs American forces visiting the Philippines for joint combat exercises.

“You know, tit for tat … if you can do this, so (can) we. It ain’t a one-way traffic,” Duterte said, adding tauntingly, “Bye-bye America and work on the protocols that will eventually move you out of the Philippines,” he said, adding his decision would come “any day soon” after reviewing another military deal, Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement.

A U.S. government aid agency, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, said earlier in the week that its board deferred a vote on a renewal of the development assistance package for the Philippines “subject to a further review of concerns around rule of law and civil liberties.”

“We do not need the money. China said they will provide so many,” he said. “The politics here in Southeast Asia is changing.”

While calling Americans “sons of bitches” and “hypocrites,” Duterte praised China as having “the kindest soul of all” for offering what he said was significant financial assistance. “So, what do I need America for?” he asked.  He also said Russia can be a very important ally. “They do not insult people, they do not interfere,” he said.

In his news conference, Duterte was pointedly asked how many crime suspects he has killed in the past when he was still a crime-busting city mayor amid his vague and contradicting accounts of his exploits, a topic that has riled up US senators in recent days. The former government prosecutor again gave contrasting replies.

“Maybe one, two three … I’m saying, maybe my bullets hit them, maybe not, but after the burumbumbumbum, they’re all dead,” Duterte said. Replying to another question, he said that he indeed has killed, but did not provide details and tried to justify his act. “When I tell you now that I killed, do not term them as suspects because all of them died while they were fighting government people.”

He asked God for forgiveness in advance, saying he may not have time to pray if he’s assassinated. “God, forgive me for killing these idiots,” Duterte said, then blamed God for the presence of criminals. “You create a human monster so if you are God, why do you have to create these idiots? That’s why they die.”

However, the outspoken president suggested relations could improve under a President Donald Trump, saying he would change his mindset if President-elect Donald Trump appeals to him. “I have talked to Trump, he was very nice, very courteous,” he said. “I could not sense any hostile drift, or even the manner he was saying it, so, in deference, I’ll just wait.”

“We talk in the same language,” Duterte said. He recalled that when he told Trump in a recent phone call that “I like your mouth, it’s like mine,” he said Trump responded by saying, “Yes, Mr. President, we’re similar.”

“I will let Obama fade away and if he disappears, then I will begin to reassess,” Duterte said, adding that he and Trump acknowledged each other’s similarly brash manners.

via http://ift.tt/2i0vBiF Tyler Durden

“Sorry, Not Sorry” – Neither The Media Nor Their Owners Are Going To Change

Submitted by Jason Hirthler via Counterpunch.org,

The leftist heretic and popular scourge of religion Christopher Hitchens wrote in his superb Bill Clinton takedown, No One Left to Lie To, that the essence of American politics is “the manipulation of populism by elitism.” Unfortunately, this tactic didn’t work so well for the Clintons in November, as the reviled populists had the last irrational, racist, sexist, brutish and barbaric word on the matter (according to assembled liberal punditry). But the statement still rings true. This is, after all, the job description of corporate media. As The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald says, the “supreme religion of the U.S. press corps is reverence for power.” Their priesthood is a cabal of anonymous sources; their catechism is war everlasting. And so, the vulgar philistines on the plains, who foolishly prefer peaceful relations, steady work, and free healthcare to profiteering wars abroad, must be endlessly misled.

Don’t expect this to change in the wake of the navel-gazing mainstream’s historic whiff on the election–despite the occasional mea culpa and promise to overhaul its approach. Mostly because 90 percent of the MSM is owned and operated by six conglomerates that have little interest in changing the system that profits them, or in changing the editorial narratives that support the system. And most probably, like Barack Obama and Madame Secretary, because the media believes Trump voters are “a basket of deplorables” that are too unfixably ignorant to understand why Hillary was the right choice.

After all, these mainstream flacks have been happily disguising the neoliberal gutting of the American economy for decades. They are so distanced from the reality of the 99 percent, it probably does seem unreal to them. Yet now, pundits unironically tell us, we live in a post-factual era. Even though the MSM has been producing counterintuitive propaganda for a long time. Do you remember the early Nineties, when the MSM started the cult of personality around CEOs like Jack Welch, who was feted for sending thousands of GE jobs to factory ghettos in India? Captain Jack knew the score, didn’t he? Or who can forget–or fail to retchingly remember–countless Thomas Friedman columns telling American workers they’d better suck it up, get with the program, and learn how to compete in a global economy. You remember the typical free trade shtick: Wave goodbye, comrades, to your coddled lifestyle and that full-time manufacturing job replete with extravagant benefits and a superfluous living wage; now you must fight tooth and nail for peasant wages against several billion proletarian youth with zero wage expectations and no knowledge of OSHA; spare me your tired complaints and pop some Zoloft for the pain, comrade; get some job retraining at the nearest overcrowded unemployment center (double up on the meds before you go); and then get excited about your new job emptying bedpans at the nearby hospital for pennies on the inflating dollar; and don’t forget to celebrate globalization on Independence Day. One can see big Thom sitting back in his leather chair to re-read his 1100 words of scintillating prose while lustily fingering his Pulitzer.

Then, fast forward to this fall, and witness the MSM spending the entirety of 2016 labeling all Trump supporters as white supremacist racist xenophobes clustered around their gun cabinets in landlocked flyover states. To be fair, they also spent a fair amount of time tediously whitewashing Hillary’s bloodbath in Benghazi so the liberal intelligentsia could reaffirm their sagacious tropes about the moral universe being “…not black and white, but shades of gray.”

Still Shilling War and Demonizing Dissent

Despite some interesting caterwauling about identity politics and the white poor, the MSM continued to miss the connection between the anger of the working class and the imperialism of the ruling class. The former is made poorer because of the latter. Spending on war usually means not spending on society. And the media has done yeoman’s work enabling both, principally by justifying nearly every imperial war as humanitarian necessity and erasing the working class from the American tableaux (except when stereotyping them as illiterate bigots, the vieux jeu herd that Friedman warmly chides, “Suck on this!”). Not understanding populist indigestion to the rancid policy platter it’s been serving up for years, what does the establishment media do? Continue shilling for imperialism, largely by spreading misinformation about Syria and ratcheting up the Russian threat with libelous claims.

This is important because, short of sustained media support, backing for imperial warfare would collapse; no imperial war can sustain itself in the presence of a free press. The Syrian war, or at least our role in it, could’ve ended a long time ago if the MSM had done their job and challenged the White House on any number of fronts. They might have, and might still do if they wanted, pointed out how the Assad government’s rejection of a Qatari oil pipeline immediately preceded the eruption of violent “protests” in eastern Syria. Mr. President, was this mere coincidence or was this pipeline the backbone of our plan to unhitch Europe from Russian energy and destroy the Russian economy? They might have asked President Obama why the CIA was arming, training, and funding intolerant jihadist terrorists in Jordan. What was St. Augustine’s rationale for this, Mr. President? (Surely, this was discussed when Obama and CIA eminence John Brennan warmly explored Augustine’s just war theories on “terror Tuesdays” before perusing the drone “Kill List.”) They might have asked Secretary of State John Kerry whether the Assad smear campaign was really necessary and whether the State Department expected anyone to believe the word of stooge informers like “Caesar,” given the experience of “Curveball” in the Iraq War. They might also have asked the president why he almost bombed Damascus based on a handful of piddling YouTube videos hastily typed up in a two-page report by Kerry’s lemmings at State. Alas, twas not to be.

Given their unwillingness to do their job, the imperial lies roll on. The New York Times began a recent article thus, “With the Syrian government making large territorial gains in Aleppo on Monday, routing rebel fighters and sending thousands of people fleeing for their lives, President Bashar al-Assad is starting to look as if he may survive…”

This is a fairly neutral opening except for the euphemism “rebel” and the unmissable, “…thousands of people fleeing for their lives,” which leaves the haphazard, scan-the-news-over-coffee reader grumbling against the misfit Syrian government. Perhaps said reader has also heard, in passing, UN Ambassador Samantha Powers’ braying theatrics over nonstop war crimes in east Aleppo, further coloring his or her view of the evil optometrist in Damascus.

Outside the mainstream, alternative news providers–known as Russian propagandists in the MSM–are calling this the thankful defeat of a NATO-sponsored terrorist army, adding that thousands are fleeing “into the arms of the Syrian Army,” escaping years of imprisonment at the hands of Western mercenary jihadists. While “into the arms of the Syrian Army” stretches anyone’s credulity, the rest appears accurate.

And instead of owning up to the real reasons they were whipsawed on Election Day, the MSM decided that it was the evil alternative media that forced the electorate to pick the wrong candidate. They huddled in editorial conclave at the Washington Post, and emerged with a long list of “fake news” websites and a giant conspiracy theory about vile Vladimir Putin ruining the democratic process from his pontiff’s chair in the cloud-draped Kremlin.

Fortunately, many on the left have admirably treated the Post’s disgraceful gutter-trolling with richly deserved contempt. For a mainstream press that regularly smears leftists as ‘conspiracy theorists,’ its Russian propaganda theory simply dwarfs most of the conspiracies it disparages. Clear-eyed journalists like Glenn Greenwald, John Pilger, Dave Lindorff, and staunch foreign policy realists like Ron Paul, have seen through the flimsy ruse.

Still Tone-Deaf In Presidential Suite

But few in the precincts of power are likely to change course either. The U.S. House and Senate bills authorizing U.S. intelligence operations–which at last count included 17 such “operations”–has decided to launch a new body “aimed at thwarting covert Russian political interference around the world.” So it seems as though, should it die in the press, some kind of McCarthyite black list will reappear at the federal level.

Despite his interest in avoiding war with Russia, Donald Trump is busily stuffing his cabinet with Wall Street insiders and military hawks, an encouraging sign for capital that the billionaire ‘outsider’ will not attempt anything that might unsettle neoliberal elites, whose comfort and perpetual enrichment is the nation’s highest calling. Advisor Steve Bannon’s trillion-dollar infrastructure project seems increasingly marginalized. Chances are the Trump White House may avert war with Russia, but will speed implementation of the neoliberal schemes both parties support.

In a breathtaking instance of an entire government swallowing its own doctrinal absurdities, the EU Parliament passed a ridiculous “resolution” to combat the nonexistent worldwide Muscovite conspiracy. This parchment ought to be pasted to the tombstone of the European Union (and the corpse itself buried with a pair of Euros over its eyes and a copy of Don Quixote under its arm).

The neoliberal dominoes continue to fall across the European continent, as the ignorant establishment recycles its feckless conceits about deregulation, privatization, and austerity to incredulous populations. Despite the Brexit stunner, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, perhaps thinking he could skate by on his youthful looks and pleasing oratory, proposed a referendum to “slash the power of the Italian Senate to speed up lawmaking.” Why would any neoliberal elitist even propose a referendum after Brexit? Especially one that is a farcical ploy to lessen democracy by creating the same kind of fast-track legislative restrictions perfected by the forked-tongued figureheads Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Recall how they used fast-track to hurry malicious corporate investor agreements past prying public eyes before the rot was scented in the air.

Renzi wanted to alter the constitution to reduce Parliamentary representatives by two-thirds. Had the PM not witnessed Donald Trump ascend the throne on the backs of disgruntled proletariat and a smattering of xenophobes with handguns? Sure enough, the Northern League’s Matteo Salvini called the result, “the revenge of the people.” Renzi tendered his resignation with immediate effect late last Monday. Both the EU and the U.S. efforts are transparent acts of attempted thought control. More than anything else, they tell us that if the press hasn’t learned its lesson, neither has the ruling class.

Out of Ideas and Out of Time

So, a month on from the world-historical upset that sent upwardly-mobile bi-coastals into fits of apoplexy, we find things much the same. The media is incorrigible and recalcitrant, unable to separate itself from power worship. Donald Trump is being gently shepherded into the arms of the comprador elite with each passing feast at Jean-Georges in Trump Tower. The cries of the voiceless dead are yet inaudible in the land of liberty. It seems that war, capitalism, and inequality still own the day.

But you have to ask yourself, is the American establishment out of ideas? Is the empire running on fumes? The hysteria produced by the YouTube surge of beheading videos by black-garbed, sword-brandishing jihadists, deep in the desert, couldn’t last forever. In its place, Washington and its lackey media have been ransacking the archives for odious enemies to prop in front of the somnolent population. They must be kept awake and alarmed. As Martin Amis wrote of his protagonist in The Information, “He needed no alarm clock. He was already comprehensively alarmed.” Frenzy is not a durable state; hence the need for relentless stimulants. CNN is Adderall for the electorate.

Lacking new ideas, finding no new enemies, and unwilling to look at the twitching Cyclops in the mirror, Washington has resurrected the Cold War and is actively resuscitating the McCarthy Era. Most of us had hoped these two miserable epochs in our history had been interred forever. But given our decade-long obsession with zombies, it’s no surprise the establishment is anxiously reanimating these rotting cadavers.

But what does it say about our so-called leadership when they slip into nostalgia for the past when facing the rubble and ruin of their modern ideology? That neoliberalism has peaked and is accelerating toward its inglorious finale? After all, history’s encore is farce, to paraphrase Marx. The tragedy of neoliberalism culminated in 2008. Perhaps the question is whether the disorganized left can glue itself together long enough to offer a fresh vision that doesn’t alienate the penny capitalist or the diehard socialist, but which does cast aside the exhausted creed of market-led globalization and its ‘humanitarian’ corollaries, which all but a few have finally seen through. The duopoly and its media minions will doubtless continue to peddle such fictions, but they are wounded and stumbling and lashing out in all directions, a savage ideology cornered by an angry electorate. We should hasten their demise. Tit for tat. For every unnamed source, we should attach a burden of proof. For every piece of patriotic jingoism, a Dickensian qualifier. And for every article of false faith, a bill of indictment.

via http://ift.tt/2hT8Dh4 Tyler Durden

Christmas Tree Sales: Trump vs Clinton States, And The Biggest Winner Is…

According to recent economic reports, US consumer confidence is soaring, but it depends who you ask. Based on the latest Evercore ISI survey, while there has indeed been a post-election spike in US consumer sentiment, it is mostly confined to states that supported Trump in the Presidential election, leading to the observation that “Post-Election Confidence Lifting Christmas Tree Sales In Trump States.

 What is the basis for this assessment: “looking at our data and grouping our tree sellers by whether they operate in a state won by Trump or Clinton, we see Trump states clearly stronger this year while Clinton states are seeing slower Christmas tree sales than in 2015. Overall Christmas Tree sales results in our survey suggest a strong year in 2016.”

But the biggest winner from this newfound resurgence of Christrmas tree sales, is not to be found in the US? According to Goldman, the true winner is… China:

The US Census Bureau estimates that $1.1 billion worth of Christmas tree ornaments and $346 million of Christmas tree lights were imported from China between January and September 2016. China accounted for 92% of the total US ornament imports and 87% of the total US tree light imports.  

Below are some other “trivial” observations on US holiday spending:

  • Last year there were 25.9 million real Christmas trees sold in the US, a 1.5% decrease versus 2014. In total, consumers spent $1.32bn on real trees (+27% yoy), according to the National Christmas Tree Association.
  • O Christmas Tree! O Christmas Tree! The National Fire Protection Association reported that on average 210 home fires per year were ignited by Christmas trees (2010-2014), accounting for just 0.1% of the reported home fires.
  • According to the Guinness World Records, the largest Santa Claus gathering was over 18 thousand during an event in… India. The largest online Secret Santa game included 89,421 participants and was organized by redditgifts.com.
  • According to the Amalgamated Order of Real Bearded Santas (AORBS), which had 1,100 members as of 2006 but has since folded, the average Santa is 59 yrs old, 5’10” tall & weighs in at 257 lbs.
  • The elves are hard at work in the US and President-elect Trump would be happy. The states with the most production facilities of dolls, toys and games were California (93), Florida (32), Illinois (31), New York (31) and Pennsylvania (25) in 2014.
  • The US Postal Service expects December 19 to be the busiest day for shipping and December 22 to be the busiest day for delivery of holiday packages, cards and letters. They’re expecting more than 30 million packages to be delivered on the peak delivery day alone.
  • Where’s the Christmas spirit? According to Box Office Mojo and Rotten Tomatoes, since 1980 the top 20 grossing Christmas themed movies of all time only received an average critic score of 49% on Rotten Tomatoes. The best: Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas (94%). The worst: Christmas with the Kranks (5%).

via http://ift.tt/2hGlXTh Tyler Durden

Fuel Tanker Explodes; 2 Die In 55-Car Crash After “Brutal” Northeast Cold Turns I-95 Into Ice Rink

The US northeast, and much of America, woke up to a brutal blast of frigid air sweeping across the United States, which has wreaked havoc on roads in Virginia and Maryland, leaving at least three dead in multi-vehicle wrecks Saturday.

According to CBS, a 55-vehicle crash on a icy stretch of I-95 in Baltimore, which also included a dramatic crash and explosion of a fuel tanker truck, left at least two people dead and motorists stranded for hours about 5 a.m. Saturday, Baltimore Fire Department spokesman Roman Clark said. Eleven people were taken to hospitals.

The frozen roads are the result of an arctic air mass, called Winter Storm Decima, that has chilled large swaths of the northern United States for days will culminate this weekend with dangerous cold in Montana and North Dakota as heavy snow falls in other parts of the country, officials said. People in North Dakota face “life threatening cold” and the risk of frostbite with exposure of 10 minutes or less, the National Weather Service (NWS) said in an advisory. In Montana dangerous wind chills are expected to last through Saturday afternoon and people should guard against hypothermia, the NWS said.

Temperatures in parts of Montana could plummet to record lows for this day of around minus 30 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 34 degrees Celsius), meteorologist Kenneth James of the Weather Prediction Center said in a phone interview cited by Reuters.

The bitter cold comes from a blast of arctic air – the second one this week – blowing south from Canada across the U.S. border into the northern plain states and the Midwest, NWS officials said. It has joined forces with a storm that swept in from the Pacific Ocean, bringing snowfall to large sections of the northern United States as it chugs across the country to the East Coast, they said. Areas of Wisconsin, Indiana, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine will see the heaviest snowfall from the storm on Saturday, with up to 6 inches (15 cm) of accumulation possible in those regions.

* * *

So far most impacted has been transportation along the I-95 corridor and especially around Baltimore, where traffic was at a stand still for hours while crews assessed this morning’s crash. Authorities say a tanker went off the bridge and fell down to the street below.

A Twitter clip posted on Saturday morning showed a fuel truck flipping over a median on the interstate before erupting in flames near the Washington Boulevard exit, CNN affiliate WBAL reported. Clark confirmed the video showed the I-95 crash.

Following the crash, I-95 in parts of southwest Baltimore has been largely shut down as emergency vehicles descended on the scene, stalling traffic for miles and leading authorities to urge stranded motorists on both sides of the interstate to “remain warm and calm and shelter in place” in their cars, Clark said.

“If you don’t have to go out on the roads, we would ask that you just
stay in at this time until the temperatures rise,” Clark told CNN.

Mayor Catherine Pugh gave a statement on the incident:

I want to share my deepest condolences to those affected by this morning’s multi-vehicle crash.  Today’s icy road conditions remind us all that it is imperative to exercise extreme caution due to severe weather. I want to thank the emergency crews for their expedient response. They continue to work closely with City agencies to render aid and coordinate efforts to stabilize road conditions for motorists. For the latest updates and information, please follow the Baltimore City Department of Transportation. We ask that residents delay travel if possible.

Elsewhere in the northeast corridor, police responded to more than 40 traffic incidents in northern Virginia, some involving multiple vehicles, according to the state police. One person was killed in a multi-vehicle crash at 5:12 a.m. on Interstate 495 in Fairfax County, state police said.

At Dulles Airport, just outside Washington D.C., icy conditions forced the closure of runways. The dangerous conditions arrived as some people started their holiday travel early.

In Indiana, the Wayne Township Fire Department and the Indianapolis police had to evacuate stranded drivers from I-465. The slick roadway forced rescuers to use a ladder in the evacuation. Police in Marion and Hendricks counties responded to nearly 200 accidents, 36 involving injuries, between 10 p.m. and 4 a.m., according to the Indianapolis police.

In the West, a snowstorm has already hammered parts of Oregon, dropping snow on the region on Wednesday. Photos showed cars strewn across snow-covered roads and trucks spun out at odd angles. Officials asked drivers to avoid the roads as traffic ground to a virtual halt.

In the Portland metro area, the snowstorm jammed public transportation and stranded hundreds of students who couldn’t get home due to dangerous road conditions, reported CNN affiliate KOIN. Many were stuck in traffic on school buses or spent extra hours at school, waiting to be picked up after one to three inches of snow fell across the region. Many of the area schools closed Thursday to avert more chaos on the roads, according to CNN affiliate KPTV.

Oregon also had three avalanches Wednesday amid the flurry of snow, closing down Highway 20, said the Oregon State Police.

As millions of people take to the roads over the holiday weekend, snow and ice will make for dangerous driving conditions on the roadways, the National Weather Service warns.

Drivers in Raleigh, North Carolina have been advised to stay home and avoid travel due to the inclement conditions.

“Freezing rain is causing traffic-related issues throughout Raleigh at this hour,” the Raleigh Police Department said in a memo Saturday.

“As is typically the case, bridges and overpasses were the among the first areas to have issues due to icing, but the problems are widespread and not limited to those locations.”

In the Indiana counties of Marion and Hendricks, authorities responded to nearly 200 accidents between 10 p.m. Friday and 4 a.m. Saturday, according to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. Thirty-six of them involved injuries, police said.

* * *

Conditions are not expected to improve much in the coming hours as frigid air blast is bringing bone-chilling winds and subfreezing temperatures to millions across the country this weekend. The National Weather Service warns that the massive system will produce heavy snow from parts of northern California to the Great Lakes. Its reach will extend into the southern Rockies and New England by Saturday morning.

Here’s what CNN says you can expect:

  • Nearly 50% of the country will see temperatures dip below freezing Saturday and Sunday
  • With the wind chill, temperatures could reach 35 below zero in the Midwest and Northeast on Saturday
  • Close to 116 million people are under a Winter Weather Advisory
  • As temperatures rise overnight, coastal cities in the Northeast will see a changeover from snow to rain by Saturday evening.
  • A strong storm over the central Rockies will move northeast to New England by Sunday morning.
  • Potentially life threatening wind chills as low as 50 degrees below zero are expected in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Colorado and Idaho.
  • Portions of Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota could get the coldest air the region has seen in two years.

via http://ift.tt/2hcfwq5 Tyler Durden

China Responds: Will Return Stolen Drone, “Regrets US Hype”

Shortly after president-elect Trump's "unprecedented action" tweet, Chinese authorities responded via their mouthpiece The China People's Daily:

 

China's Defense Ministry confirmed on Saturday it plans to return an underwater U.S. drone seized this week by a Chinese naval vessel in the South China Sea, but complained the United States was "hyping up" the incident.  The drone was collecting data about the salinity, temperature and clarity of the water about 50 nautical miles northwest of Subic Bay, off the Philippines, and was seized just as the USNS Bowditch was about to retrieve it, U.S. officials said.

The Defense Ministry said a Chinese naval vessel discovered a piece of "unidentified equipment," and checked it to prevent any navigational safety issues before discovering it was a U.S. drone.

"China decided to return it to the U.S. side in an appropriate manner, and China and the U.S. have all along been in communication about it," the ministry said on its website. "During this process, the U.S. side's unilateral and open hyping up is inappropriate, and is not beneficial to the smooth resolution of this issue. We express regret at this," it added.

Without directly saying whether the drone was operating in waters China considers its own, China's Defense Ministry said U.S. ships and aircraft have for a long period been carrying out surveillance and surveys in "the presence" of Chinese waters.

"China is resolutely opposed to this, and demands the U.S. stops this kind of activity," it said. China will remain on alert for these sorts of activities and take necessary steps to deal with them, the ministry said without elaborating.

* * *

As AP reported, China said Saturday that its military seized a U.S. Navy unmanned underwater glider in the South China Sea to ensure the "safe navigation of passing ships," in one of the most serious incidents between the two militaries in years.

Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Yang Yujun issued a statement late Saturday saying that a Chinese navy lifeboat discovered an unknown device in the South China Sea on Thursday. "In order to prevent this device from posing a danger to the safe navigation of passing ships and personnel, the Chinese lifeboat adopted a professional and responsible attitude in investigating and verifying the device," Yang said.

 

The statement said that after verifying that the device was an American unmanned submerged device, "China decided to transfer it to the U.S. through appropriate means."

 

The statement also accused the U.S. of long deploying ships "in China's presence" to conduct "military surveying."

 

"China is resolutely opposed to this and requests the U.S. stop such activities," it said. "China will continue to maintain vigilance against the relevant U.S. activities and will take necessary measures to deal with them."

 

Earlier Saturday, China's foreign ministry said the country's military was in contact with its American counterparts on "appropriately handling" the incident, though it offered no details on what discussions were underway.

In a separate report, the paper quoted retired Chinese admiral Yang Yi as saying China considered itself well within its rights to seize the drone.

"If China needs to take it, we'll take it. (America) can't block us," Yang was quoted as saying. Yang said he was unsure of the purpose of seizing the drone, but didn't think the matter qualified as a "military conflict."

However, he added that the chances of a confrontation had risen following Trump's recent comments, which were seen as testing China's bottom line on Taiwan and other sensitive issues. "It's natural for us to take possession of and research for a bit these types of things that America sends to our doorstep," Yang said. "The louder they shout, the more their protests ring hollow."

As we concluded earlier, the drone seizure coincided with sabre-rattling from Chinese state media and some in its military establishment after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump cast doubt on whether Washington would stick to its nearly four-decades-old policy of recognizing that Taiwan is part of "one China," and as China devalues its currency to the weakest against the dollar since May 2008, Trump's comments also drew reaction from China's finance minister…

China hopes there won't be a trade war with the United States, but it will take "appropriate steps" to cope with that possibility, a Chinese vice finance minister said on Saturday.

 

Zhu Guangyao, addressing an economic forum at a time of rising tensions with Washington, said both countries should abandon a "zero sum" mentality and seek to improve to improve economic and trade cooperation.

On Friday, Obama said it was appropriate for Trump to take a fresh look at U.S. policy toward Taiwan, but he cautioned that a shift could lead to significant consequences in the U.S. relationship with Beijing, as the notion that Taiwan is part of "one China" is central to China's view of itself as a nation. For now, Trump is ignoring Obama's advice and instead is more focused on venting about one-off "precedents" using Twitter without an autocorrect function.

via http://ift.tt/2huQHZl Tyler Durden

‘Progressive’ San Franciscans Strongly Support Immigration Rights (Just Not In Their Neighborhood)

"Not in my back yard…"

San Francisco is one of the most progressive cities in the nation, especially when it comes to national immigration, notes San Francisco Chronicle's Vincent Woo.

We believe so much in the natural right of people to join us here in America that we fought to keep our status as sanctuary city even in the face of being federally defunded for it. We pride ourselves on our rejection of plans to tighten immigration controls and deport undocumented immigrants.

Yet, Woo exclaims, take that same conversation to the local level and all bets are off.

City meetings have become heated, divisive and prone to rhetoric where we openly discuss exactly which kinds of people we want to keep out of our city.

 

This is an ethically incoherent position. If we in San Francisco so strongly believe that national immigration is a human right, then it seems strange to block migration into our own neighborhoods.

 

Consider the San Francisco Board of Supervisors’ decision to challenge the environmental review of a proposed housing project at 1515 Van Ness Ave. Despite the project’s plan to rent 25 percent of its units at a below-market rate, many members of the neighborhood preservation group, Calle 24, expressed anger that the project might bring tech workers into the Latino Cultural District.

 

Or that members of the Forest Hill homeowners association opposed a project that would build affordable housing for seniors and the formerly homeless on a site now occupied by a church. One of the grievances aired was that it might bring mentally unstable or drug-addicted people into the neighborhood.

Both of these groups are reacting to the threat of change. In both cases, residents took it as a given that they were within their rights to control who lived in their neighborhoods.

Conservatives see national immigration as a privilege to carefully dole out. Liberals see immigration as a human right that needs to be protected. San Francisco progressives view living in certain neighborhoods as a privilege to be earned, and see nothing wrong with preventing certain groups of people from moving in, a traditionally conservative view.

 

Tech workers have now become the most visible of those whom neighborhood groups seek to exclude. Tech workers have been been cast as shallow opportunists who indifferently displace existing residents. However, most tech workers who move here are simply migrants from less affluent parts of the country. They’re people from places like the Midwest who are just trying to find good jobs in one of the last functioning economic engines in the country. If we believe that San Francisco should be a shelter for people from less prosperous countries, why shouldn’t it also be a shelter for people from less prosperous parts of our own country?

 

Even more pointedly, more than a third of Silicon Valley tech workers are immigrants themselves. For many people in China, India and Eastern Europe, working in technology is one of the few ways out of their countries and into ours.

 

Neighborhood activists want to protect their vision of San Francisco, and that is absolutely a noble purpose. However, blocking future residents isn’t the way to go about it. How would you even do it?

 

The current approach of attempting to just halt construction hasn’t proven effective at preserving neighborhood aesthetics. To truly control who lived in a neighborhood, you’d have to create some official tribunal that would essentially have the ability to vet applicants by their demographics. This is would be very dangerous and likely illegal. It’s hardly a progressive idea to deliberately institutionalize exclusionary policy.

 

If we really believe that migration is a human right and not a privilege extended at the discretion of current residents, then we need to acknowledge that neighborhood meetings where people feel entitled to debate the virtues of future residents are antimigration by definition.

 

We need to acknowledge that making room for, say, an Indian tech worker on an H1-B visa who is trying to get a green card serves the very same ideological purpose as making room for an undocumented worker from Mexico.

Once again the progressive agenda can be translated as the elite establishment liberals exclaiming "do as I say, not as I do..it's the fair thing to do."

via http://ift.tt/2hGcX0g Tyler Durden