Hints That SCOTUS May Overturn the Texas Abortion Law

Before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died, his colleague Anthony Kennedy was the swing vote on whether to uphold H.B. 2, the Texas abortion law that restricts the procedure to surgical centers and requires doctors who perform it to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. Now that the Supreme Court is down to eight members, Kennedy is still the swing vote, although not in quite the same way. If Kennedy sides with the three conservative justices who clearly want to approve H.B. 2, the even split will leave in place an appeals court ruling that upheld the law, but the impact will be limited to the 5th Circuit. If Kennedy sides with the four liberal justices who clearly want to overturn H.B. 2, the ruling will doom similar laws throughout the country. His questions during yesterday’s oral argument suggest the latter possibility is more likely.

Under Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the justices are supposed to decide whether H.B. 2 imposes an “undue burden” on the right to obtain an abortion, meaning that “its purpose or effect is to place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability.” As I noted in my column yesterday (and as Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer emphasized during oral argument), the medical justification for H.B. 2 is very weak, which suggests protecting women’s health is a pretext for discouraging abortion, since the law is expected to reduce the number of abortion clinics in Texas by about 75 percent.

Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller argued that the resulting burden should not be considered “undue” as long as women “are able to make the ultimate decision to elect the procedure.” But Kennedy, who played a crucial role in deciding Casey, did not seem inclined to accept that argument. He suggested that the state’s rationale for a regulation and the obstacles created by the regulation are not “two completely discrete analytical categories,” that “the undue burden test is weighed against what the state’s interest is.”

In other words, any given burden on women seeking abortions might be deemed constitutional or not, depending on the strength of the state’s justification. That means the crucial issue may be not how many women will have to drive how much farther to get abortions as a result of H.B. 2 but whether the official justification for the law has any real scientific basis. Focusing on the law’s rationale, as opposed to its practical consequences (which remain uncertain), does not bode well for its supporters. Another bad sign for them: Kennedy noted that H.B. 2 seems to have encouraged women who might have obtained drug-induced abortions to have surgical abortions instead, which “may not be medically wise.”

Then again, Kennedy also suggested, during a discussion of whether the case should be remanded for further fact finding, that the Court might not know enough about the capacity of the abortion clinics that would remain after H.B. 2 took full effect. Before the law was passed, he noted, those clinics accounted for about 20 percent of the state’s abortions. But he wondered if they might be able to expand enough to pick up the slack.

If the case is sent back to the lower courts, the justices might not see it for another year or two, at which point the significance of Kennedy’s vote will have changed once again. Should Hillary Clinton win the presidential election in November, Kennedy’s vote won’t matter, since whoever she picks to replace Scalia will side with the Court’s liberal wing to overturn H.B. 2. If a Republican wins the election (even if it’s Donald Trump), Scalia’s replacement probably will vote to uphold the law, in which case Kennedy will once again have the power to set a national precedent one way or the other.

More on the Texas abortion case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown and Damon Root.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1QuckQQ
via IFTTT

A.M. Links: GOP Debate Tonight, Romney vs. Trump, More Email Troubles for Hillary

  • Mitt Romney, the Republican Party’s 2012 presidential nominee, will deliver a speech today attacking Donald Trump. “His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University,” Romney is expected to say.
  • “The Justice Department has granted immunity to a former State Department staffer, who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, as part of a criminal investigation into the possible mishandling of classified information, according to a senior law enforcement official.”
  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter weighed in on the privacy showdown between Apple and the FBI, saying that encryption technology is “absolutely essential” from the Defense Department’s point of view. “We are squarely behind strong data security and strong encryption, no question about it.”

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and dont forget to sign up for Reasons daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1QO7hK8
via IFTTT

Cartels Demonstrate the Utter Failure of the War on Drugs: New at Reason

To understand how drug cartels work, we should consider the industry as we would any other that has to deal with regular business problems–how to hire the best personnel, how to handle the competition, how to deliver product to customers, and so on.

That is what Tom Wainwright sets out to do in his new book Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel. “Regulatory approaches that in the ordinary business world would be discarded for their ineffectiveness have been allowed to endure for years in the world of counternarcotics,” says the author, a former correspondent in Mexico for The Economist. Ian Vasquez, director of the Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity at the Cato Institute, explores Wainright’s book and how drug cartels operate in Latin America.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1UBquoo
via IFTTT

Initial Jobless Claims Rise Again But What’s Wrong With This Picture?

For the second week in a row, initial jobless claims rose (up 6k to 278k) but remain flat at 42 year lows for the last year. Challenger job cuts rose 21.8% YoY (and yet initial jobless claims are lower still YoY. The problem with this ‘data’ is that employment signals from both manufacturing and services PMIs are entirely divergent

 

 

Still it keeps The Fed’s recovery narrative alive, so just hold your nose and buy the f##king dream.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1p1nGFr Tyler Durden

Bill Gross Previews The Financial Apocalypse: “The Classical Economic Model Has Reached A Dead End”

Bill Gross takes a turn for the downright apocalyptic (with a +/- 5 billion year error margin) in his latest letter speculating on the future of banking and finance under NIRP in a world where the “credit based economic system appears to be in the process of devolving from a production oriented model to one which recycles finance for the benefit of financiers”; a world in which “the negative interest rates dominating 40% of the Euroland bond market and now migrating to Japan like a Zika like contagion, are an enigma to almost all global investors”; a world where our “finance based economic system which like the Sun has provided life and productive growth for a long, long time – is running out of fuel and that its remaining time span is something less than 5 billion years.”

His bottom line? The same as ours for the past 7 years: “central bankers seem ever intent on going lower, ignorant in my view of the harm being done to a classical economic model that has driven prosperity – until it reached a negative interest rate dead end and could drive no more.”

The next step: admission of failure and paradropping money, leading to soaring inflation.

Or perhaps Gross is wrong and banks will be able to sweep all the world’s problems under the money printing/NIRP/helicopter money rug for another 5 billion years?

His full monthly letter below

Sunshine, Lollipops and…

Our Sun – a rather tiny star in the galaxial scheme of things – seems inexhaustible. But 5 billion years from now, it will swallow, instead of nurture the Earth as it burns itself out – first contracting, then expanding like a flaming candle turned firecracker. Not to worry though. We won’t be around. It’s not that we are beyond worrying; it’s that our lives are much shorter and we needn’t think much about it. In the nearer term, there is global warming/climate change, and other such down to Earth problems as paying the bills and getting kids into the right colleges. Still – there are presumably inexhaustible things that deserve our attention in the here and now. One of them is finance-based capitalism and our assumption that the risk/ reward historically inherent in it will be sufficient to drive economic growth forward. Unlike the Sun, whose fate and lifespan can be scientifically determined, there is little evidence that anything could ever change what has been until now a flawed, yet the best economic system conceivable. Capitalistic initiative married to an ever expanding supply of available credit has facilitated economic prosperity much like the Sun has been the supply center for energy/ food and life’s sustenance. But now with quantitative easing and negative interest rates, the concept of nurturing credit seems to have morphed into something destructive as opposed to growth enhancing. Our global, credit based economic system appears to be in the process of devolving from a production oriented model to one which recycles finance for the benefit of financiers. Making money on money seems to be the system’s flickering objective. Our global financed-based economy is becoming increasingly dormant, not because people don’t want to work or technology isn’t producing better things, but because finance itself is burning out like our future Sun.

What readers should know is that the global economy has been powered by credit – its expansion in the U.S. alone since the early 1970’s has been 58 fold – that is, we now have $58 trillion of official credit outstanding whereas in 1970 we only had $1 trillion. Staggering, is it not? But now, this expansion appears to be reaching an ending of sorts, at least in its current form. Private sector savers are growing leery of debt piled upon debt and government regulators have begun to build fences against further rampant creation. In addition, the return offered on savings/investment whether it be on deposit at a bank, in Treasuries/ Bunds, or at extremely low equity risk premiums, is inadequate relative to historical as well as mathematically defined durational risk. The negative interest rates dominating 40% of the Euroland bond market and now migrating to Japan like a Zika like contagion, are an enigma to almost all global investors. Why would someone lend money to a borrower with the certainty of getting less money back at a future date? Several years ago even the most Einsteinian-like economists would not have imagined such a state but now it seems an everyday occurrence, as central banks plumb deeper and deeper depths like drilling rigs expecting to strike oil, if only yields could be lowered another 10, 20, 50 basis points.

There is growing evidence that they cannot. Instead of historically generating economic growth via a wealth effect and its trickle-down effect on the real economy, negative investment rates and the expansion of central bank balance sheets via quantitative easing are creating negative effects that I have warned about for several years now. Negative yields threaten bank profit margins as yield curves flatten worldwide and bank NIM’s (net interest rate margins) narrow. The recent collapse in worldwide bank stock prices can be explained not so much by potential defaults in the energy/commodity complex, as by investor recognition that banks are now not only being more tightly regulated, but that future ROE’s will be much akin to a utility stock. Observe the collapse in bank stock prices – not just in the last few months but post Lehman. I’ll help you: Citibank priced at $500 in 2007, now $38 as shown in Chart I. BAC $50/now $12. Credit Suisse $70/now $13. Deutsche $130/now $16. Goldman Sachs $250/now $146. Banking/finance seems to be either a screaming sector ready to be bought or a permanently damaged victim of write-offs, tighter regulation and significantly lower future margins. I’ll vote for the latter.

Chart I: The Big C Then and Now

 

In addition to banks, business models with long term liabilities that depend on 7-8% future returns from risk assets are themselves at risk – not necessarily of bankruptcy but future profitability. The Met, the PRU, Hartford – all of these insurers whether it be for life, accident, or storm damage, cannot cover claims as conveniently as they could in the past, because they can’t earn as much on their bonds and stocks. Same goes for pension funds. Puerto Rico follows Detroit not just because of overpromised benefits but because they cannot earn enough on their investment portfolios to cover the promises. Low/negative interest rates do that. And the damage extends to all savers; households worldwide that saved/invested money for college, retirement or for medical bills. They have been damaged, and only now are becoming aware of it. Negative interest rates do that.

But central bankers seem ever intent on going lower, ignorant in my view of the harm being done to a classical economic model that has driven prosperity – until it reached a negative interest rate dead end and could drive no more.

In addition, government policymakers seem to be setting up future roadblocks for savers. There is a somewhat suspicious uniform attack on high denomination bills of global currencies. Noted economists such as Larry Summers; respected journalists such as the FT’s Gillian Tett, central bankers such as Mario Draghi – all seem suddenly concerned that 500 Euro or 10,000 Yen Notes are facilitating drug dealers and terrorists (which they are). But what’s an economist/central banker doing opining on law enforcement? It appears that the one remaining escape hatch for ordinary citizens is being closed. Money in a mattress will heretofore be associated with drugs/terror. The cashless society which appears over the horizon may come sooner than the demise of the penny! Give a 500 Euro/take a 500 Euro is in our future I guess. Both that and the lowly penny will be equally scorned.

And that’s not the end of it. If negative interest rates fail to generate acceptable nominal growth, then the Milton Friedman/Ben Bernanke concept of helicopter money may be employed. How that could equitably be distributed nationally or worldwide I have no idea, but the opinion columns are mentioning it more and more often, and on Twitter, the “Likes” are increasing in numbers. Can any/all of these policy alternatives save the “system”? We shall find out, but current evidence of the past 7 years’ experience would support only a D+ report card grade. Barely passing. As an investor though – and as a citizen in this election year – you should be aware that our finance based economic system which like the Sun has provided life and productive growth for a long, long time – is running out of fuel and that its remaining time span is something less than 5 billion years.

Investment implications? Do not reach for the tantalizing apple of high yield or the low price/ book ratio of bank stocks. Those prices are where they are because of low/negative interest rates. And too, do not reach for the seemingly momentum driven higher prices of Bunds and Treasuries that negative yields have produced. A 30 year Treasury at 2.5% can wipe out your annual income in one day with a 10 basis point increase. And no, you can’t go to a bank and demand your cash for a fear of being labeled a terrorist. Seems like you’re cornered, doesn’t it? Well not quite. The secret in a negative interest rate world that poses extraordinary duration risk for AAA sovereign bonds is to (1) keep bond maturities short and (2) borrow at those attractive yields in a mildly levered form that provides a yield (and expected return) of 5-6%. Janus unconstrained portfolios attempt to do that and are inching to the head of its asset universe day by day. No guarantees. The advice about borrowing at low yields above obviously has to be matched with investments that are less volatile and least affected by the evolving changes of our monetary system. But it can be done. Closed end funds at deep discounts, highly certain acquisition arbitrage stocks, as well as volatility sales at tails are general examples.

The Sun still comes up every morning but at different times according to the season. Summer, for our credit based financial system, is past and a shorter winter-like solstice is in our future. Be prepared for change.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1njcMJj Tyler Durden

Interest on Gold Is the New Tempest in a Teapot

by Keith Weiner

Zero Hedge published an article on Canadian Bullion Services (CBS) last week. Other sites ran similar articles. The common thread through these articles, and in the user comments section, is that CBS is committing criminal fraud. Or, if not, then it’s a conspiracy by the Canadian government to confiscate gold. Terms like fractional reserve and re-hypothecation were dusted off for the occasion.

I don’t know anything about this company other than what I read that day. I am writing today to make a different point, not to address or defend CBS.

My point is: a company offers interest on gold, and the gold community goes ballistic. Why so visceral a response? To answer that, we need to look at the backdrop of today’s bizarre financial world.

Interest rates have been falling for well over three decades. This has caused endless asset bubbles in which to speculate to make a fortune (or lose one). And now, in the terminal stage of our monetary disease, there is scant yield to be had even in the US. Negative yields already prevail in several other countries.

We have become accustomed to it. We’re trained to not expect to earn interest, to not even think about it. Instead, we’re like Pavlov’s dogs who know to salivate at the sound of a bell. Only we’re not after food, but opportunities to speculate. All we want to know is, what’s going up next. Mainstream folks prefer to speculate on mainstream assets like stocks and real estate. Gold bugs would rather bet on gold and silver. Either way, it’s the same: seek capital gains by the rising dollar price of an asset. Yield is as dead as the rotary dial telephone.

And, we’re beyond merely accustomed. People demand speculative bubbles. It feels right as rain—or the next dose of opiate painkillers. Besides, speculation is how you get rich quick. Especially with leverage. Interest is boring and slow.

As those articles I mentioned earlier show, many people who are accustomed to demand speculative capital gains are actually offended at the very promise of a yield. It’s cognitive dissonance. If speculation is how we are supposed to make money, then interest is a vestige of the old normal. It’s like a thorn under your skin that you can’t get rid of, an annoying reminder.

This touches on a point I frequently make: gold does not go up or down. It’s the dollar that goes down or up. However, if this is true, then there’s a problem: how can you speculate on gold? I think so many people are so insistent on measuring gold in dollars for a simple reason. They want gains.

They want gold to go up, so they can get rich. This requires something to use to measure gold. If gold is going up, then compared to what? The dollar!

Perversely the fiat dollar suits the gold bugs as well as it suits the Federal Reserve (though for different reasons). Both believe that if everyone is forced to use the dollar as the unit of account, then they benefit from rising asset prices.

After the fiat dollar, what comes next? There are two possibilities. One is a normal world where gold is used as money, and people can earn a return on their gold. The other is collapse into a new dark age. Even in a dark age, gold is money all right. It’s just that no one wants to risk getting killed for his metal.

There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with borrowing, lending, or earning interest. In fact, the loan is a win-win deal. It benefits the business who borrows in order to produce the things that people want. And it benefits the saver and retiree who lend to earn an income on their savings. Productive lending is an integral part of the gold standard.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1p1kXfg Monetary Metals

Large Cap Growth Stocks At “Pivotal” Level

Via Dana Lyons' Tumblr,

The S&P 500 Pure Growth Index has broken above a key level that has alternately served as support AND resistance over the past 2 years.

When traders mention “pivot points”, they are referring to levels on a chart that serve as both support and resistance, depending upon whether prices are above or below the level. Basically, they are like any support or resistance levels, except that they have been tested from both sides. Consider them support/resistance lines with experience. One case in point, with current ramifications, can be seen in the chart of one of the market’s former leaders, the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index (SPXPG).

Notice on the SPXPG chart how in the past few years, prices have alternately been repelled by the level near 7600, both from below and from above. This is a good example of a pivot point.

 

image

 

First, in early 2014, the 7600 area served as resistance, repelling prices lower for about 4 months. Finally, in mid-2014, the SPXPG broke above that level. Thus, what was resistance became support, and it did indeed provide such support on two occasions soon after.

Fast forward to 2015 and we see the 7600 level again serving as support at both the August and September lows. After finally dropping below there early this year, what was support once again became potential resistance. And the late January bounce did find resistance again right at the 7600 level.

After subsequently testing (and undercutting) the January lows, the SPXPG has bounced to once again challenge the 7600 pivot point area. And in yesterday’s rally, the index surpassed the level, closing around 7719. So, for the moment, the 7600 pivot point has been reclaimed and, once again, turns the former resistance into potential support.

What’s the takeaway? Simple: if prices are above the 7600 level, the area should act as support. If prices fall back below the line, it should serve as resistance. Thus, if this former market leader – large-cap growth – is to return to leadership status, it would do well to hold above this “pivotal” level.

*  *  *

More from Dana Lyons, JLFMI and My401kPro.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1njcG4j Tyler Durden

Rewarding States for ACA Failures: New at Reason

DoctorsIf you are tired of reading columns about Affordable Care Act failures, don’t read any further. If you’re not, please meet yet another example of how the shockingly incompetent government has wasted so much of our money in developing and administering services that are taken for granted in the private market—namely, the ACA exchanges.

A number of exchanges have already failed outright, with perhaps the most notable being the implosion of Cover Oregon. The $300 million spent building Oregon’s exchange made it the third-most expensive, behind New York and California, two far more populous states. Cover Oregon also infamously spent $21 million on folksy ads that were widely mocked on the Internet and late-night talk shows.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t just those ads that turned out to be a joke, writes Veronique de Rugy.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1UBl6le
via IFTTT

“Donald Trump Is A Phony, A Fraud”: Mitt Romney Lashes Out In Desperation Establishment Attack

While the GOP establishment already hit peak panic following Trump’s Super Tuesday rout, it is about to “rise above” said peak based on an advance transcript of the speech that Mitt Romney will deliver later on Thursday to the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah according, in which he will declare that “Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He’s playing the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat.”

The two republicans seen in better times.

Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, and the 2012 failed Republican presidential nominee, will say that Trump as U.S. president would damage the country at home and abroad. “His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the temperament nor the judgement to be president. And his personal qualities would mean that America would cease to be a shining city on a hill.”

“On Hillary Clinton’s watch at the State Department, America’s interests were diminished in every corner of the world. She compromised our national secrets, dissembled to the families of the slain, and jettisoned her most profound beliefs to gain presidential power,” Romney says. He also says, “A person so untrustworthy and dishonest as Hillary Clinton must not become president. But a Trump nomination enables her victory.”

According to Bloomberg, the criticism marks the bluntest attempt so far by the Republican establishment to slow Trump’s momentum after his victories on Tuesday in the single biggest day of voting in the Republican race. Of 15 U.S. states that have held nominating contests to date, Trump has won 10 and has 46 percent of the delegates awarded so far.

What is surprising is that the sharp attack comes at a time when some of the core GOP establishment have shown signs of relenting and warming to Trump; as reported last night, the Koch brothers said they have “no plans to get involved in the primary.” This follows another mega-donor, Rupert Murdoch’s call to “unify the party” as Trump tries to make peace with the “establishment.” Others have joined inL “I like the fact that he knows how to negotiate. We’ve had seven, eight years of somebody who doesn’t know how to negotiate,“ said Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who faces a challenging re-election bid in a state won twice by Barack Obama.

Still, others are not giving up, and after Trump’s Super Tuesday wins this week, a pair of super-PACs that oppose him stepped up their advertising efforts as Republicans wrestled with whether and how to stop Trump at this late stage of the nominating process, and which alternative candidate to unite behind. The ads targeted the billionaire’s Trump University as a “scam” duping “victims.”

To be sure, Trump was quick to respond, and put out a preemptive tweet strike at Romney Thursday. “Failed Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney is having a news conference tomorrow to criticize me. Just another desperate move by the man who should have easily beaten Barrack Obama,” Trump tweeted, spelling the president’s name wrong.

Another tweet:

Trump also tweeted, “I have brought millions of people into the Republican Party, while the Dems are going down. Establishment wants to kill this movement!”

What’s more, said Trump:

In addition, Trump posted an attack video on his Facebook page Wednesday targeting Romney, showing the former Massachusetts governor flip-flopping on issues such as immigration, health care, abortion, the TARP bailouts and global warming, notes CBS New York.

Expect more fireworks later today during Romney’s speech, whose highlight will be the live-tweeted annotations by the man who Paddy Power has already decided will be the Republican nominee.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/21JBDWh Tyler Durden

Frontrunning: March 3

  • Global stocks, oil dip, but markets calm down as growth fears ease (Reuters)
  • Greece cannot carry migrant burden on its own: PM Tsipras (Reuters)
  • New Migrant Crisis Flares in Greece (WSJ)
  • Qatar’s BeIn Media buys U.S. film studio Miramax (Reuters)
  • Nanny who beheaded Russian girl cites revenge for Putin’s Syria strikes (Reuters)
  • Elliott Management’s wager on Argentinian government bonds has yielded $2.4 billion (WSJ)
  • Tesla’s Getting More Rivals as VW Scandal Clouds Diesel Outlook (BBG)
  • Samsonite Nears Deal to Buy Luxury Luggage Maker Tumi (WSJ)
  • Macau’s Economy Shrinks 20% in 2015 Amid Casino Gaming Slump (BBG)
  • UBS France Confirms it Is Under Investigation for Alleged Witness Tampering (BBG)
  • No Political Deal Likely in Syria, Despite Shaky Cease-Fire (WSJ)
  • Fastest-Growing Region in the Americas Is Loving the Oil Slump (BBG)
  • Alaska’s Biotech Sugar Daddy Is Showering Money on Startups (BBG)
  • SunEdison’s Troubles Darken Prospects of Vivint Deal (WSJ)
  • Euro-Area Companies Cut Prices as Recovery Loses Momentum (BBG)

 

Overnight Media Digest

WSJ

– Elliott Management’s wager on Argentinian government bonds has yielded $2.4 billion after many twists and turns in a contentious battle with the South American country. (http://on.wsj.com/1QmWSIo)

– The mounting financial woes of SunEdison Inc, once a Wall Street darling, have jeopardized the solar energy company’s plans to purchase Vivint Solar Inc. (http://on.wsj.com/1QmWUjj)

– Goldman Sachs Group Inc is likely to withdraw a bid on a $3 billion Russian bond deal after the U.S. government last week cautioned Wall Street firms against pursuing the business, people familiar with the matter said. (http://on.wsj.com/1QmX2zA)

– U.S. airlines hustled to apply for access to 20 daily flights to Havana before a Transportation Department deadline Wednesday, as U.S. and Cuban officials prepared to restart scheduled air service between the two nations for the first time in over 50 years. (http://on.wsj.com/1QmX8XN)

– Samsonite International SA is nearing a deal to buy luxury luggage maker Tumi Holdings Inc, according to people familiar with the matter. (http://on.wsj.com/24CLrDL)

 

FT

Qatar’s BeIn Media Group said it would buy film studio Miramax, the producer behind cult movies such as “Pulp Fiction”.

Rolls-Royce has appointed a partner from its largest shareholder, ValueAct Capital, to its board after the U.S. activist investor built up a stake in the British engineer following a string of profit warnings last year.

According to the French economy minister, Emmanuel Macron, France would relocate its migrant camp from Calais to Britain and roll out “a red carpet” for bankers leaving London if the UK leaves the EU.

 

NYT

– Former Chesapeake Energy Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon, who was indicted on federal bid-rigging charges accusing him of conspiring to suppress prices for oil and natural gas leases, died in a car crash in Oklahoma City on Wednesday morning. (http://nyti.ms/1oQTJqI)

– Volkswagen acknowledged on Wednesday that its former chief executive Martin Winterkorn was given a memo in May 2014 that contained information about irregularities in the emissions of its diesel cars, well over a year before the company publicly admitted cheating on pollution tests.(http://nyti.ms/1QUPpne)

– Miramax, one of Hollywood’s best-known independent film and television labels, was acquired by the beIN Media Group, a sports and media company headed by Qatari executive Nasser Al-Khelaifi, the companies said on Wednesday.(http://nyti.ms/1poxOb4)

– Seeking to entertain the elusive millennial, Verizon Communications and media powerhouse Hearst announced on Wednesday the formation of a joint venture to develop programming for young adults to watch on their phones. (http://nyti.ms/1Y3MWX0)

 

Britain

The Times

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, the aero-engineer which has warned on profits five times in two years, has appointed the activist investor that is its biggest shareholder to its board. Bradley Singer, a partner and the chief operating officer of ValueAct, will be a non-executive director and join the board with immediate effect. (http://thetim.es/1RIpD2H)

Activity in the UK’s construction sector slumped to a 10-month low in February, as growth in the housebuilding sector appeared to lose momentum and businesses become uncertain about the future ahead of the EU referendum. (http://thetim.es/1RIpWKQ)

The Guardian

A financial institution, Green Investment Bank, set up by the UK government to accelerate Britain’s green power revolution could end up being sold to private equity firms and fund wind farms in Germany. (http://bit.ly/1LW7euz)

The chief executive of Rolls-Royce Motor Cars, which is owned by BMW, has written to all its workers in Britain to warn that exit from the European Union would drive up costs and prices and could affect the company’s “employment base”. (http://bit.ly/1ninNKT)

The Telegraph

The UK’s embattled steel sector faces fresh pressure after the US government stepped in to protect its domestic industry against the growing glut of cheap Chinese supply, industry groups have warned. (http://bit.ly/1LWo7W4)

A recession in Europe could lead to the collapse of the eurozone, as the single currency would buckle under the political turmoil unleashed by a fresh downturn, according to economists at Swiss bank Credit Suisse. (http://bit.ly/1RHtqNz)

Sky News

BlackRock Inc, the world’s biggest fund manager, has warned that a UK exit from the European Union is likely to see a reduction in the size of the UK financial services industry. (http://bit.ly/1QMCCwO)

Jane Shepherdson, the former boss of Top Shop, is in talks with prospective buyers eight years after being installed as Whistles’ chief executive. (http://bit.ly/1QsKkgp)

The Independent

Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel-prize winning economist, has said that the United Kingdom could be better off leaving the European Union if the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership passes. (http://ind.pn/1Rp9QTJ)


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1p1eJfg Tyler Durden