You've Got (No) Mail!

In light of its 19th quarter of losses in a row, calls for a Federal bailout, and recent consideration of adding a Bitcoin exchange to its non-bank financial services (via a “postcoin”), we thought a glimpse how “postal” the USPS is set to become was useful. Some will call it progress of course but as the following chart shows, the number of US Postal Service employees has fallen to 50-year lows (and would and could be more) – “The Postal Service is doing its part within the bounds of law to right-size the organization,”  blaming federal mandates that restrict how it can conduct business and excessive funding requirements for its employee pension plan.

 

 

h/t @Not_Jim_Cramer


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1iSyiNW Tyler Durden

You’ve Got (No) Mail!

In light of its 19th quarter of losses in a row, calls for a Federal bailout, and recent consideration of adding a Bitcoin exchange to its non-bank financial services (via a “postcoin”), we thought a glimpse how “postal” the USPS is set to become was useful. Some will call it progress of course but as the following chart shows, the number of US Postal Service employees has fallen to 50-year lows (and would and could be more) – “The Postal Service is doing its part within the bounds of law to right-size the organization,”  blaming federal mandates that restrict how it can conduct business and excessive funding requirements for its employee pension plan.

 

 

h/t @Not_Jim_Cramer


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1iSyiNW Tyler Durden

ACLU Wants the Feds To Fess Up About Email Snooping

InternetThe American Civil Liberties Union
wants the Federal Bureau of Investigation to answer a few questions
about how it scoops up that oh-so-don’t worry-about-it metadata the
feds keeps saying is perfectly legitimate to collect. For instane,
is it true the FBI uses “port readers” to mass-copy whole emails,
including content, and then erases the messages and just
keeps the metadata? This is important not just in bureau
activities, but because we’ve learned that the NSA’s domestic
spying programs
take place under the authority of the FBI
.

From the
ACLU
:

Yesterday, we filed a Freedom of Information Act request with
the FBI asking for details about a surveillance tool we know too
little about, called a port reader. According to news reports, port
readers copy entire emails and instant messages as they move
through networks, in real time. They then delete the contents of
the messages, leaving only the “metadata” — the sender, recipient,
and time of a message, and maybe even the location from which it
was sent — behind for the government. According to the same
reports, the FBI is taking steps to install port readers on the
networks of major U.S. phone and Internet companies, going so far
as to make threats of contempt of court to providers that don’t
cooperate.

The use of port readers isn’t a new revelation, as news travels
these days. CNet
reported last August
about the feds putting the squeeze on
Internet service providers to build the technology into their
systems so agents could drink from the stream at will. But the
formal ACLU
FOIA filing
is new, and could tell us just deeply burrowed into
our communications the government has been all this time, and just
how much “trust us” they expect the American public to swallow.

Among the questions the ACLU wants answered are those below:

  1. Policies, procedures, practices, and legal memos relating to
    the installation and use of port reader processes, devices,
    hardware, software, or firmware;
  2. Technical specifications for the installation and use of port
    reader processes, devices, hardware, software, or firmware
    (including any relevant API, ABI, or network protocol
    specification);
  3. What kinds ofintemet traffic (i.e., what protocols) are
    captured by port reader processes, devices, hardware, software, or
    firmware;
  4. What categories of metadata port reader processes, devices,
    hardware, software, or firmware are capable of capturing, and which
    categories are in fact collected;
  5. Whether and to what extent port readers copy or retain
    communications content, including any content of emails, any
    content of instant messages, and any addresses of web pages
    visited;
  6. How many communications have had their content or metadata
    copied or retained using port reader processes, devices, hardware,
    software, or firmware;
  7. How many individuals have had their communications metadata or
    content copied or retained using port reader processes, devices,
    hardware, software, or firmware;
  8. Whether telecommunications carriers and Internet service
    providers have installed port reader processes, devices, hardware,
    software, or firmware;
  9. The case name, docket number, and court of any legal proceeding
    in which any private entity has challenged or resisted the
    installation and use of port reader processes, devices, hardware,
    software, or firmware;
  10. Pursuant to which legal authorities the FBI bases its claim
    that it may lawfully request or compel the installation and/or use
    of port reader processes, devices, hardware, software or
    firmware.
  11. The name of the tool identified by CNET and Foreign Policy as a
    port reader.

The answers should be fascinating, but don’t hold your breath
while you wait for the FBI to cooperate.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/Nvltze
via IFTTT

Justice Department May Reform Law Used to Prosecute Aaron Swartz

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says it is considering

loosening
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which has a
controversial reputation for doling out disproportionately harsh
sentences for electronic misdemeanors. Wired
calls
the unjust cyber-crackdown, nourished by the CFAA, “our
new war on drugs.”

Aaron Swartz is a well-known victim of the stringent laws. The
26-year-old computer wizard made contributions to RSS and Reddit,
and organized resistance to SOPA. He
engaged in the electronic equivalent to trespass when he downloaded
material in bulk off of the JSTOR. This deed was a violation of the
digital library’s terms-of-service, but prosecutors treated as a
severe criminal act. He hanged himself while facing up to $1
million in fines and 35 years in prison.

As a result of the CFAA, many more Americans have received
draconian punishments, disproportionate to the relatively minor
crimes they committed. 

The law, enacted in 1986, appears to be fueled by a fear of the
digital age. Hanni Fakhoury, staff attorney at the Electronic
Frontier Foundation,
argued
in Wired:

The government’s mindset is that technology and the
internet can wreak havoc. Disseminating the login credentials of a
powerful media company to vandalize a few websites, for example,
has the potential to cause more damage than spray-painting graffiti
on a highway sign.

Confronted with mounting pressure from civil rights groups, the
DOJ claims it intends to reform. The Washington
Post

reports
:

In congressional testimony this week, the agency said it would
support modifying the CFAA in ways that would make it harder for
the government to prosecute Americans who commit relatively minor
infractions online.

The U.S. government still doesn’t quite know how to respond to
crimes committed electronically. Reform is necessary to curb
the unjust sentences dangled in front of at Americans like Swartz.
The Justice Department’s apparent willingness to reform could be a
step in the right direction.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fUHT4F
via IFTTT

How Big a Deal Is the Prospect of an Openly Gay NFL Player?

What we really can't predict is whether stupid homoerotic references to "tight ends" will increase or decrease.Is America ready for an openly
gay NFL player?

Yes,
of course
. That’s kind of a silly question if you think about
it in terms of how the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” played
out.

Did you forget about that? So did everybody else. Despite the
fear-mongering that it would affect morale, there seems to have
been
little actual impact
in allowing gay men and women serving
openly in the military.

I noted in my end-of-year review about how
amazingly gay I found the year 2013
that pretty much the last
threshold for cultural gay tolerance to be hammered out in the
United States was in professional sports. Though there are openly
gay male athletes in the less prominent professional sports like
soccer and boxing, we still do not have an openly gay male athletes
currently competing in professional baseball, basketball or
football.

Then this weekend, Michael Sam, a top lineman from the
University of Missouri,
came out of the closet
(to the media – this teammates already
knew). It matters because he’s apparently a good enough player to
make the transition to the NFL. If he’s drafted in May, he would
become the first openly gay actively competing football player.
That’s assuming no existing players come out of the closet in the
meantime.

That the media is
making
such a
big deal
out of
Sam
may seem a little strange, particularly to those who are
and have always been down with the gay folks. It’s helpful to
consider the idea that we’re writing the last chapter in a very
lengthy book of American history. The advancement and acceptance of
an openly gay male pro athlete (sorry pioneering ladies – we know
you were first) is the final stage of cultural acceptance of gay
people living openly and happily without having to hide who they
are. The Onion, in their usual fashion, made a
joke
out of it in August that’s funny but insightful: “Area
Teen Quickly Running Out Of Chances To Be First Openly Gay
Anything.”

Obviously, there are still so many more conflicts and debates
about how gay people are treated by the law and what “rights” apply
(scare quotes due to the fundamental cultural disagreement about
what even constitutes a right). Today gay couples
filed suit
in Ohio to force the state to recognize their
marriages, a battle being replicated in several states right
now.

And though homophobia may be on the decline, it’s naïve to think
it’s going to fade into nothingness. Racism and sexism still exist.
There’s always some sort of justification for believing some humans
should be treated as lesser to others for reasons that should have
no actual bearing.  

But all eyes are on Sam because this is the final doorway in
America for cultural acceptance. It marks the end of certain silly
ideas about how masculinity informs sexuality that have had lasting
impacts on the psyches of straights and gays alike for decades.
It’s a huge deal, though the impact may not be fully grasped except
in retrospect years from now.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1ej3v87
via IFTTT

"Why Does Rand Paul Keep Attacking Bill Clinton About Sex?"

Hat tip:
Instapundit.

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza offers four reasons and
legal blogger Ann Althouse offers four different ones:

Althouse writes:

Cillizza came up with:

1. It revs up the base…
2. It’s a way to get at Hillary…
3. It’s who Rand is…
4. It’s personal….

Before reading those reasons — which are detailed at the link —
I set a goal for myself to come up with 4 more reasons. Off the top
of my head, here:

1. He believes in the principle of workplace equality and is
dismayed at how predatory individuals seeking personal sexual
pleasure have disrupted the meritocracy that should
prevail. 

2. Someone on the Republican side needs to be able to counter
the “war on women” propaganda of the Democrats, and no one else
seems to have the guts or skill to do it properly. 

3. He dislikes the idea that the distinction of first female
President should go to a woman who leveraged her power through a
male who she knew was taking advantage of women.

4. He knows that if the Democrats had material like this to use
against a Republican candidate, they would have no mercy. 


Read the whole thing – and add to her list – at Althouse
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fUzQ7X
via IFTTT

“Why Does Rand Paul Keep Attacking Bill Clinton About Sex?”

Hat tip:
Instapundit.

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza offers four reasons and
legal blogger Ann Althouse offers four different ones:

Althouse writes:

Cillizza came up with:

1. It revs up the base…
2. It’s a way to get at Hillary…
3. It’s who Rand is…
4. It’s personal….

Before reading those reasons — which are detailed at the link —
I set a goal for myself to come up with 4 more reasons. Off the top
of my head, here:

1. He believes in the principle of workplace equality and is
dismayed at how predatory individuals seeking personal sexual
pleasure have disrupted the meritocracy that should
prevail. 

2. Someone on the Republican side needs to be able to counter
the “war on women” propaganda of the Democrats, and no one else
seems to have the guts or skill to do it properly. 

3. He dislikes the idea that the distinction of first female
President should go to a woman who leveraged her power through a
male who she knew was taking advantage of women.

4. He knows that if the Democrats had material like this to use
against a Republican candidate, they would have no mercy. 


Read the whole thing – and add to her list – at Althouse
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fUzQ7X
via IFTTT

Guest Post: The Smog Of Fraud

Submitted by James Howard Kunstler of Kunstler.com,

Team Obama pulled a cute one last week nominating Blythe Masters, JP Morgan’s commodity chief, to an advisory committee of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) which supposedly regulates activities on the paper trades in corn, pork bellies, cocoa, coffee, wheat, corn — oh, and gold, too, by the way, in which JP Morgan has been suspected of massive gold (and silver) market manipulations and other misconduct lately. That would include the 2011 MF Global Fiasco in which nearly a billion dollars from “segregated” customer accounts somehow ended up parked over at JP Morgan as a result of bad derivative bets on tanking Eurozone bonds. MF Global, primarily a commodities trading brokerage, was liquidated in 2011. The CFTC never issued referrals for prosecution to the Department of Justice in the matter and, of course, MF Global’s notorious CEO, Jon Corzine remains at large, enjoying caramel flan lattes in the Hamptons to this day. Such are the Teflon transactions of the Obama years: nothing sticks.

There was such a Twitter storm over Blythe Masters that she withdrew from consideration for the committee before the day was out.

JP Morgan is one of the specially privileged “primary dealer” banks said to be systemically indispensible to world finance. Supposedly, if one of them is allowed to flop, the whole global matrix of global debt obligations — and, hence, global money — would dissolve in a misty cloud of broken promises. They are primary dealers to their shadow partner, the Federal Reserve, and their main job in that relationship is buying treasury bonds, bills, and notes from the US government and then “selling” them to the Fed (earning commissions on the sales, of course). The Fed, in turn, “lends” billions of dollars at zero interest back to the primary dealers who then park the “borrowed” money in accounts at the Fed at a higher interest rate. This is, of course, money for nothing, and even small interest rate differentials add up to tidy profits when the volumes on deposit are so massive.

This “carry trade” was started because the primary dealer banks were functionally insolvent after 2008 and needed to build “reserves” up to some level that would putatively render them sound. But that was a sketchy concept anyway since accounting standards had been officially abandoned in 2009 when the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) declared that banks could report the stuff on their books at any value they felt like. In short, the soundness of the biggest banks in the USA could no longer be determined, period. They were beyond accounting as they were beyond the law. At the same time, the banks began the operations of shifting all the janky debt paper, mostly mortgages and derivative instruments (i.e. made-up shit like “CDOs squared”), value unknown, from their vaults to the a vaults of the Federal Reserve, where it resides to this day, rotting away like so much forgotten ground round in the sub-basement of an abandoned warehouse of a bankrupt burger chain.

All of these nearly incomprehensible shenanigans have been going on because debt all over the world can’t be repaid. The world’s economy, as constructed emergently over the decades, can’t function without repayable debt, which is the essence of “credit” — the fundamental trust implicit in banking. You have “credit” because other persons or parties believe in your ability to repay. After a while, this becomes a mere convention in millions of transactions. What’s happened is that the conventions remain in place but the trust is gone. It’s gone in particular among the parties deemed too big to fail.

Everybody knows this now and everybody is trying desperately to work around it, led by the Federal Reserve. Trust is gone and credit is going and debt is sitting between a rock and a hard place with its grubby hands pressed together, praying that it will be forgiven, forgotten, or overlooked a little while longer. By the way, the reason trust and credit are gone is because oil is no longer cheap and world economies can’t grow anymore. They can’t afford to run the day-to-day operations of a techno-industrial society. They can only pretend to afford it. The stock markets are mere scorecards for players who can only lie and cheat now to keep the game going. Somewhere beyond all the legerdemain and fraud, however, there remains a real world that is not going away. We just don’t know what it will look like when the smog of fraud clears.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1bFOyNG Tyler Durden

Farage Blasts "Bullying Brussels", Cheers Swiss Immigration Curbs Bill

Switzerland's surprise decision in favor of curbing EU immigration, was greeted by UKIP's Nigel Farage as "wonderful news for national sovereignty and freedom lovers throughout Europe." With 50.3% of Swiss voters backing the "Stop Mass Immigration" bill proposed by right-wing populists, AFP reports that Farage (who has been outspoken over immigration and sovereignty problems in Europe) added "a wise and strong Switzerland has stood up to the bullying and threats of the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels." As we noted previously, with the EU elections rapidly approaching non-centrist status quo parties are quickly gaining attention as 'the protest vote' gains traction.

 

Via AFP,

The leader of Britain's main eurosceptic party hailed "wise" Swiss voters Sunday for backing curbs on EU immigration, saying it would encourage others across the continent.

 

Nigel Farage, the head of the UK Independence Party, said Switzerland had stood up to "bullying" from Brussels and that it was "not a matter of race but of space."

 

"This is wonderful news for national sovereignty and freedom lovers throughout Europe," said Farage, who is a member of the European parliament (MEP).

 

"A wise and strong Switzerland has stood up to the bullying and threats of the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels."

 

Final results from a referendum showed that 50.3 percent of Swiss voters had backed the "Stop Mass Immigration" proposal pushed by right-wing populists, threatening to ignite a row with Brussels.

 

UKIP has led calls for similar calls for a cap on immigration, a touchy issue in Britain since Bulgarians and Romanians were given full rights on January 1 to free movement within the European Union.

 

Farage added: "It is a great thing to be welcomed that the Swiss people now have the freedom to decide the number and skill level of the people who they wish to invite to work or stay in their country."

 

"It is not a matter of race but of space, of numbers and of skills," he said.

Of course this move is a blow for a Europe "run by big banks, big business, and big government" as Farage has described it in the past but we thoght this brief discussion from the UK (Boston, Lincolnshire) was useful in summing up the rising tensions from both the people and non-status-quo politicians looking for change…

 

 

It would seems to us that one 'event' that no one is discussing as a catalyst is the EU elections and here, from El Pais, is a very enlightening graphic showing the considerable growth in "Extreme Right" parties across the entire European region:

 

Whether, as Farage has warned in the past, we remain on the verge of social unrest is unclear but for sure this is not the poltical union that Barroso pitches it to have become…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1bFOwp8 Tyler Durden

Farage Blasts “Bullying Brussels”, Cheers Swiss Immigration Curbs Bill

Switzerland's surprise decision in favor of curbing EU immigration, was greeted by UKIP's Nigel Farage as "wonderful news for national sovereignty and freedom lovers throughout Europe." With 50.3% of Swiss voters backing the "Stop Mass Immigration" bill proposed by right-wing populists, AFP reports that Farage (who has been outspoken over immigration and sovereignty problems in Europe) added "a wise and strong Switzerland has stood up to the bullying and threats of the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels." As we noted previously, with the EU elections rapidly approaching non-centrist status quo parties are quickly gaining attention as 'the protest vote' gains traction.

 

Via AFP,

The leader of Britain's main eurosceptic party hailed "wise" Swiss voters Sunday for backing curbs on EU immigration, saying it would encourage others across the continent.

 

Nigel Farage, the head of the UK Independence Party, said Switzerland had stood up to "bullying" from Brussels and that it was "not a matter of race but of space."

 

"This is wonderful news for national sovereignty and freedom lovers throughout Europe," said Farage, who is a member of the European parliament (MEP).

 

"A wise and strong Switzerland has stood up to the bullying and threats of the unelected bureaucrats of Brussels."

 

Final results from a referendum showed that 50.3 percent of Swiss voters had backed the "Stop Mass Immigration" proposal pushed by right-wing populists, threatening to ignite a row with Brussels.

 

UKIP has led calls for similar calls for a cap on immigration, a touchy issue in Britain since Bulgarians and Romanians were given full rights on January 1 to free movement within the European Union.

 

Farage added: "It is a great thing to be welcomed that the Swiss people now have the freedom to decide the number and skill level of the people who they wish to invite to work or stay in their country."

 

"It is not a matter of race but of space, of numbers and of skills," he said.

Of course this move is a blow for a Europe "run by big banks, big business, and big government" as Farage has described it in the past but we thoght this brief discussion from the UK (Boston, Lincolnshire) was useful in summing up the rising tensions from both the people and non-status-quo politicians looking for change…

 

 

It would seems to us that one 'event' that no one is discussing as a catalyst is the EU elections and here, from El Pais, is a very enlightening graphic showing the considerable growth in "Extreme Right" parties across the entire European region:

 

Whether, as Farage has warned in the past, we remain on the verge of social unrest is unclear but for sure this is not the poltical union that Barroso pitches it to have become…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1bFOwp8 Tyler Durden