Guest Post: Take The Money And Run: China's Ill-Gotten Wealth Flees Overseas

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

The front door is covered with official pronouncements of "the China Dream" and blustery demands of hegemony, but the back door is choked with members of the financial/political Elite fleeing China and taking their wealth with them.

The first thing to understand about China is there is always a front door and a back door to everything. The front door is what's presented to the outside world; the back door is for everything that doesn't fit the PR image created by the front door.

The front door presents positive "face," the back door is for everything that would "lose face," so it's hidden and never discussed, except in private, and only with trusted family or friends.

A friend who once worked for the Chinese government recently returned home after several years absence, and found that all her bosses had moved to the West: Australia, Canada, etc. These were typical officials: their base salary was low but they managed to buy multiple homes, support mistresses, have upscale autos, and so on.

In a word, ill-gotten wealth. There are tens of thousands of these beneficiaries of China's boom in credit and corruption, and they have all either fled (with their ill-gotten wealth) to the West or "safe-haven" East (Singapore, for example). Those who haven't fled yet have passports to a safe haven, and cash and homes overseas awaiting their arrival.

It is common knowledge that the offspring of top officials all have passports and homes awaiting them in the West.

That every one of your political bosses has left China is an astounding revelation into the mindset of those who have benefited most from China's boom: they obviously fear that some upheaval could strip away their ill-gotten wealth, otherwise, why not simply move to some wealthy enclave in China?

The front door is covered with official pronouncements of the China Dream and blustery demands of hegemony, but the back door is choked with members of the financial/political Elite fleeing China and taking their wealth with them. All of this is well-known, yet it is spoken of in hushed tones, lest China lose face from this wholesale exodus of those who stripmined the nation with credit and corruption.

If the Elites had any faith in China's future, and in the security of their wealth, why would they be fleeing China in perhaps the greatest peacetime exodus of wealth the world has ever seen? Estimates of the money flowing out of China are merely guesses, of course, but the numbers run into the tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars.

Those in the political/financial Elites have the best information about conditions in China. What speaks louder, actions, or empty words? Actions, without a doubt. It's difficult to see how China can be as stable as advertised when its monied Elites all have back doors out of the country and homes awaiting them in the West. The most fearful (or guilty) aren't waiting around to risk the future in China; they're already long gone. What does that say about the front door pronouncements of hegemony and dreams? The inconvenient truth is the Chinese Dream is to live in Palo Alto:

Why Chinese People Buy So Many Homes in Palo Alto (The Atlantic)

Chinese Dream: To Become the Father of an American, by Jia Jia "When Bill Clinton visited China in 1998, a female student named Ma Nan at Peking University stood up and denounced the appalling human rights condition in the US. She was supposed to file a question, but she sounded more like she was delivering a lecture. Later on, she married an American man, gave birth to a son, became the mother of an American, and departed China for good."

Young, Gifted, and Chinese "Facing the future of housing, marriage, and job, why do our hearts beat not with expectations but fear?"

Fitch says China credit bubble unprecedented in modern world history

China in Revolution and War "Several serious problems in China could trigger a major crisis, potentially igniting either a domestic revolution or foreign war."

How will a slowing China cope with rapidly aging buildings?


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nGN2arQ6njI/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Julian Assange Probably Safe from the Zealous Department of Justice. For Now. Probably.

Come on out, Assange. It's totally safe. These giant nets? They're for catching butterflies. Stop being paranoid.Realizing that attempting
to throw Julian Assange in prison for leaking classified documents
through WikiLeaks would put the federal government inevitably in a
collision course with America’s own media, the Department of
Justice appears to be
pulling back
, for now. From The Washington
Post
:

The Justice Department has all but concluded it will not bring
charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for publishing
classified documents because government lawyers said they could not
do so without also prosecuting U.S. news organizations and
journalists, according to U.S. officials.

The officials stressed that a formal decision has not been made,
and a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks remains impaneled, but
they said there is little possibility of bringing a case against
Assange, unless he is implicated in criminal activity other than
releasing online top-secret military and diplomatic documents.

The Obama administration has charged government employees and
contractors who leak classified information — such as former
National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden and former Army
intelligence analyst Bradley Manning — with violations of the
Espionage Act. But officials said that although Assange published
classified documents, he did not leak them, something they said
significantly affects their legal analysis.

A former spokesman for the DOJ said they could not see any way
to prosecute Assange for what he’s done without having to prosecute
journalists at places like the New York Times or The
Washington Post
.

Read the full story
here
.

I imagine we should be glad that they didn’t just decide the
opposite and start prosecuting the journalists, too, the way the
Department of Justice has been operating these days.

A statement sent out from WikiLeaks in response to the story
suggests they’re not buying it:

The anonymous assertion that Julian Assange may not be indicted
for publication of classified documents, even if true, only deals
with a small part of the grand jury investigation. That
investigation has been primarily concerned with trying to prove
somehow that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks were involved, not merely
in publication, but in a conspiracy with their sources. There is
also the question as to the status of the DoJ investigations into
WikiLeaks involvement in the Stratfor and Snowden matters.

Follow this story and more at Reason
24/7
.

Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and
Reason articles. You can get the
widgets
here
. If you have a story that would be of
interest to Reason’s readers please let us know by emailing the
24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories
at 
@reason247.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/26/julian-assange-probably-safe-from-the-ze
via IFTTT

Ahistoric, Unscientific Papal Prejudice Is Okay When it’s About Capitalism, Anyway!

Jesus Christ. |||Pope
Francis’s
Evangelii Gaudium
about the “new
tyranny” of “unfettered capitalism
” might just be the
biggest thing to hit the lefty blogosphere since Mitt Romney
uttered the instantly immortal, irrelevant phrase “binders
full of women
.”

It’s
about time
,” says Daily Kos diarist Egberto Willies.
Great
Pope or Greatest Pope?
” wondered Wonkette’s
Commie Girl. “Pope
Francis Strafes Libertarian Economics
,” celebrated
Slate’s Matthew Yglesias. It’s like that time Sinead O’Connor ripped up a picture
of the Pope
, only this time the Pope is Sinead O’Connor,
and the picture is capitalism!
Yay!

I don’t wish to stand in the way of people enjoying other
people’s prejudices, but Francis’s hyperbolic rants about the role
and allegedly dictatorial power of free markets are embarrassing in
their wrongness. Cheering them on is like donating money to a
Creationist Museum, only with more potential impact. To take one
papal passage out of dozens:

Today everything comes under the laws of competition and the
survival of the fittest, where the powerful feed upon the
powerless. As a consequence, masses of people find themselves
excluded and marginalized: without work, without possibilities,
without any means of escape.

"Without any means of escape," the man said. ||| The EconomistMore people have escaped
poverty the past 25 years than were alive on the
planet in 1800
. Their “means of escape” was largely the
introduction of at least some “laws of competition” in endeavors
that had long been the exclusive domain of authoritarian,
monopolistic governments. Here’s
The Economist
:

In 1990, 43% of the population of developing countries lived in
extreme poverty (then defined as subsisting on $1 a day); the
absolute number was 1.9 billion people. By 2000 the proportion was
down to a third. By 2010 it was 21% (or 1.2 billion; the poverty
line was then $1.25, the average of the 15 poorest countries’ own
poverty lines in 2005 prices, adjusted for differences in
purchasing power). The global poverty rate had been cut in half in
20 years.

The country that cut poverty the most was China, which in 1980
had the largest number of poor people anywhere. China saw a huge
increase in income inequality—but even more growth. Between 1981
and 2010 it lifted a stunning 680m people out poverty—more than the
entire current population of Latin America. This cut its poverty
rate from 84% in 1980 to about 10% now. China alone accounts for
around three quarters of the world’s total decline in extreme
poverty over the past 30 years.

And
don’t forget Africa and India
!

In Africa, inflation-adjusted per capita incomes rose by an
astonishing 97 percent between 1999 and 2010. Hunger in India
shrank by 90 percent after the country replaced 40 years’
worth of socialist stagnation with capitalist reforms in
1991.

I actually like the new guy, otherwise. |||To look upon the miracles of this world and
lament the lack of “means of escape” is to advertise your own
ignorance. To call it a “tyranny” is to do violence to any
meaningful sense of that important word (much like Francis’s
predecessor did with his silly “dictatorship
of relativism
” crack). And to make such absolutist
statements as “everything comes under the laws of
competition and the survival of the fittest” is to admit up front
that you are not primarily interested in spreading truth, but
rather in exciting popular passions. Which I suppose makes
sense.

It’s a free world; Pope’s gonna Pope & all that. I don’t go
to the Vatican for global economics, and Catholics probably don’t
seek out Reason for spiritual guidance. And the new kid in
the Vatican actually seems pretty good to my outsider eyes. But
prejudice against global capitalism isn’t some kind of twee affect
coming from the mouth of one of the globe’s largest religious
institutions. It’s an out-and-out attempt to rewrite measurable
history to fit theological imperatives. Liberals who congratulate
themselves on mocking creationists while co-signing factually
laughable claims about the world they actually live in are not
exactly demonstrating a consistent adherence to the Scientific
Method.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/26/ahistoric-unscientific-papal-prejudice-i
via IFTTT

Margin Debt Soars To New Record; Investor Net Worth Hits Record Low

The correlation between stock prices and margin debt continues to rise (to new records of exuberant "Fed's got our backs" hope) as NYSE member margin balances surge to new record highs. Relative to the NYSE Composite, this is the most "leveraged' investors have been since the absolute peak in Feb 2000. What is more worrisome, or perhaps not, is the ongoing collapse in investor net worth – defined as total free credit in margin accounts less total margin debt – which has hit what appears to be all-time lows (i.e. there's less left than ever before) which as we noted previously raised a "red flag" with Deutsche Bank. Relative to the 'economy' margin debt has only been higher at the very peak in 2000 and 2007 and was never sustained at this level for more than 2 months. Sounds like a perfect time to BTFATH…

 

Record negative investor net worth…

 

and record high margin relative to stocks… (lower pane)

 

and record high margin debt relative to GDP (and rising at a near record pace which has historically signalled a slowing)…

 

should be met with BTFATH…

 

 

And as more attention has shifted to the topic of speculator leverage once more, inquiries into the correlation between bets upon bets and stock performance are popping up once more, in this case in a study by Deutsche Bank titled "Red Flag! – The curious case of NYSE margin debt." Of particular note here is a historical comparison of margin-debt warnings that have recurred throughout history but especially just before major stock bubble crashes, such as in the period 1999/2000, 2007/2008 and of course today, which have time and again been ignored. Here is what was said then, what is being said now, and what is ignored always.

As DB says, "we prepared a collection of press articles which were published around the key events during the past financial crises. Our key finding is straight forward. Irrespective of the publishing date, the articles read alike throughout the two major crisis periods, i.e. the “new technologies market equity bubble” (1999-00) and the “Great/Global Financial Crisis” (2007-08). Most interestingly, literally the same content can be found in todays’ press. Universal phrases include:

  • “A rising stock market encouraged more investors to go into debt to buy stocks, sending margin debt levels past their all-time high”.
  • “The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) has asked members to review their lending requirements in a sign of increasing concern that rising levels of margin debt could exacerbate a stock market plunch.”
  • “The Fed is concerned about a sharp rise in margin debt but has been unwilling to attack stock market speculation as high levels of leverage do not necessarily translate into high risk. The last time the Fed adjusted the margin rules was in 1974, when when it reduced the down payment required for stocks to 50 percent of the purchase price, from 65 percent.” […] “The Fed should return to its pre- 1974 policy of actively changing margin requirements in response to stock market speculation”.
  • “High margin debts show the effect of over-leveraging and mispricing of risk”.
  • “The movements in stocks cause brokerages to stop allowing customers to buy some of the volatile stocks on margin or require clients to put up more cash.”
  • “Either the market rises dramatically to make those loans good or in any down move there is tremendous selling pressure”.
  • “Until recently, most investors ignored red flags raised by regulators”.

And more detail:

25 May 1999, Event: 1st MoM change in NYSE margin debt > 10%, Reuters News: “Soaring margin debt seen bad for Internet stocks.”

“Soaring margin debt is likely to trigger a debacle in Internet stocks", Charles Biderman, chief executive of TrimTabs.com said Tuesday. "New online investors are buying heavily on margin and it looks like they're buying Internet stocks", Biderman said. TrimTabs.com is a Santa Rosa, Calif.-based firm which collects information on mutual fund flows and other market data. "When people borrow to buy (stocks) that's a very bad sign for the future." Biderman cited figures showing margin debt for customers of New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) member firms at $182 billion at the end of April, up from $156 billion at the end of March and $142 billion at the end of February. He said the nearly 30 percent increase over a two-month span was unprecedented. ” The wild price moves in Internet stocks, which can go up or down tens of dollars a day, have caused brokerages to stop allowing customers to buy some of these volatile stocks on margin or require clients to put up more cash. "Either the market has to rise dramatically to make those loans good or in any down move there's tremendous selling pressure," Biderman said. 

 

 

08 December 1999, Event: 2nd MoM change in NYSE margin debt >10%; The Cambridge Reporter: "Margin debt oddly overlooked "

"U.S. Federal Reserve figures show that margin debt has grown tremendously. Since 1993 the rate at which margin debt has grown is three times faster than the growth rate for U.S. household debt and overall debt in credit markets. According to a non-profit think tank, Financial Markets Centre, as a percentage of market capitalization or the total value of stocks, margin debt has reached the highest level since just before the 1987 market crash. Too, as a percentage of gross domestic product, margin debt is at the highest level in 63 years, and now of course the over-valued stock market makes that more worrisome. In Canada for reasons of privacy margin debt figures are not disclosed. The U.S. Federal Reserve has been unwilling to attack stock market speculation. Since January, 1974, the Federal Reserve has left margin requirements at 50 percent, despite the huge rise in the stock market. The unwillingness of monetary authorities to deal with the equity markets is unprecedented and puzzling. The failure to acknowledge the role of debt in the stock market surge, something so massive, is difficult to understand. Now, just sitting with folded hands is a prescription for disaster in thee long run for the U.S. and Canada as well." 

 

 

21 December 1999, Event: 3rd MoM change in NYSE margin debt >10%; The Los Angeles Times: "Monthly increase, largest since 1971, adds to fears that le
vel of speculation in stocks may signal near-term peak"

"The Federal Reserve is concerned about a sharp rise in margin debt, or money borrowed from brokers to purchase stocks, in the last two months of 1999, Fed chairman Alan Greenspan said on Wednesday. Greenspan said, however, that the Fed did not consider raising its margin requirements, currently at 50 percent, an effective way to address the problem. At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on his renomination, Greenspan was asked if the Fed was worried about data showing margin debt rose substantially in November and December. "Obviously," he replied. "It is certainly the case that the numbers that you cite, especially for November and December, have caught our attention." While there has been considerable conversation at the Fed about how to address the problem, Greenspan said changing margin requirements was not the solution. "All of the studies have suggested that the level of stock prices have nothing to do with margin requirements," he said. The Fed has been reluctant to adjust requirements that would not affect large investors, who have other sources of financing, he said. "

 

 

26 February 2000, Event: (prior to) Margin debt peak; Reuters News: “NYSE, NASD call for review of margin lending rules.”

“The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) have asked members to review their lending requirements in a sign of increasing concern that rising levels of margin debt could exacerbate a stock market plunge. […]Some firms add their own requirements to that rule in order to limit risk but the popularity of margin borrowing still causes concern. Indeed, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said recently that the central bank has been paying increasing attention to a surge in margin debt. Last fall, the NYSE said margin debt held by its member firms equalled $182 billion, or 2 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product. That compared with NYSE member firm margin debt of $30 billion at the start of the decade.”

 

 

17 May 2000, Event: (post) Margin debt peak, WSJE: "Margin Debt Fell Almost 10% in April – Turbulence in U.S. Market May Have Curbed Borrowing"

"Margin debt, which has been soaring, fell nearly 10%during the month. The drop marks the first time since August that investors pruned their debt loads. Investor borrowing reached record levels in recent months, drawing the scrutiny of securities regulators who viewed it as a sign of the market's peculative fervor. But until recently,most investors ignored red flags raised by regulators. "The bottom line is that investors got their fingers burned during the recent market downdraft," says Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. analyst Henry McVey. The drop isn't all that surprising, however, given last month's sharp fall in stock prices. Many investors were forced to come up with additional cash or stock to meet margin calls; others had their stocks sold without notice as falling share prices eroded the value of their holdings. The decline in investor borrowing was sharp at some online firms. At Datek Online Holdings Corp., margin debt fell about 20% in April and "looks pretty flat in May so far," says spokesman Mike Dunn. Margin debt also fell about 20% in April at Ameritrade Holding Corp. and is up about 1%or 2%so far this month, a spokeswoman says. About 80% of the decline is due to customers voluntarily cutting back on their borrowing, she adds. Some brokerage firms continue to make it tougher for investors to borrow to buy stock. TD Waterhouse Group Inc. plans to increase its base margin-lending rate to 35% from 30% on June 15. "We think the change is prudent and we think it protects customers, in light of the current volatility we're seeing in the marketplace," says TD Waterhouse spokeswoman Melissa Gitter. The online broker now has more than 800 stocks subject to higher margin requirements, up from 443 on April 13."
 

 

 

19 December 2006, Event: 1st MoM change in NYSE margin debt > 10% DJ News Service, "Margin Debt Saw Big Spike In November"

"A rising stock market encouraged more investors to go into debt to buy stocks last month, sending so-called margin debt to a level not seen in more than six years. […] November was the first month since 2000 that margin debt has topped the $270 billion figure. The last time that happened was in March 2000, when margin debt set a record at $278.53 billion as the Nasdaq Composite Index was reaching its all-time peak. Last month's rise, which left margin debt about 3% below its record, came as stocks continued to rise. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index gained 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively, during November, leaving both market barometers with double-digit percentage gains for the first 11 months of the year. That display has helped inspire margin trading, in which investors use funds borrowed from their brokers to help finance their transactions. "This market has been uni-directional" for a while, and "that gets a lot of money chasing performance," said Art Hogan, chief market  analyst at Jefferies. "You're not going to borrow to buy in a market where the trend has been downward."

 

 

20 February 2007, Event: All-time high margin debt (Mar-2000) crossed;  Dow Jones Intl News: “Margin Debt Tops All-Time High; Reached $285.6B In January”

“A rising stock market continued to inspire investors to go into debt to buy stocks last month, sending margin-debt figures past their all-time high, which had been set several years ago in the waning days of the technology-stock boom.Margin debt as tracked by the New York Stock Exchange totaled $285.61 billion in January, the NYSE said Tuesday, up from $275.38 billion in December and moving past the previous peak of $278.53 billion. That high was set in March 2000, as the Nasdaq Composite Index was peaking. Margin debt's recent advance has come as stocks moved higher.”

 

 

11 April 2007, Event: 2nd MoM change in NYSE margin debt > 10% The Globe and Mail: “Record level of margin debt prompts regulator warning”

"As thousands of homeowners in the United States are realizing it's unwise to borrow more than they can afford, the National Association of Securities Dealers is offering a similar warning to investors: It's risky to invest more than you have. The brokerage regulator said yesterday the amount of debt investors took on to buy securities, known as buying “on margin,” had soared to a record $321.2-billion (U.S.) in February. That topped the previous  record of $299.9-billion in March, 2000, at the peak of the last bull market in stocks. Margin debt has more than doubled from $141.3-billion in January, 2003, the NASD said, three months after the bottom of a bear market in stocks." “When the Internet bubble imploded, many people were shocked to learn that firms can sell their stock, and they have no choice in what can be sold,” John Gannon, an NASD senior vice-president for investor education, said. Regulators, including the Federal Reserve, the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, set minimum requirements for margin traders. Brokerages are free to set more stringent standards. Under the minimum requirements, before trading on margin, ordinary investors must deposit at least $2,000 or 100 per cent of the purchase price, whichever is less. Fed rules generally let investors borrow up to 50 per cent of the purchase price of securities that can be bought on margin. NYSE and NASD rules then require equity in an account to b
e at least 25 per cent of the securities' market value in that account, known as a “maintenance margin.” “You can lose your money fast and with no notice,” the Securities and Exchange Commission said.

 

 

12 July 2007, Event Margin debt peak; The Wall Street Journal: "On the NYSE, 'Margin Debt' Jumps to Record $353 Billion"

"Investors are borrowing record sums of money to finance trades on the New York Stock Exchange, according to data due out from the Big Board today. NYSE officials attribute the trend to recent regulatory changes effectively allowing both small and big investors to take on more leverage, or borrowed money, from their brokers. So-called margin debt, a broad measure of leverage, jumped 11% to $353 billion at NYSE in May, up from nearly $318 billion in April.Wall Street has had a love affair with leverage in recent years, typified by hedge funds and private-equity firms that make use of it to buy companies and stocks and bonds. Such financing can also amplify losses if investors' bets go the wrong way. But regulators say that doesn't necessarily translate into more risk. "I wouldn't necessarily say that leverage equates to risk," said Grace Vogel, executive vice president for member regulation at NYSE. "We feel that the amount of margin being collected by the firms is appropriate, given the strategies in [their customers'] portfolios." 

 

 

27 October 2007, Event: S&P 500 peak, SUNBUS: "Stock market vulnerable to sharp fall as margin debt remains high"

"It has become a source of concern to some investors who worry that it makes the stock market more vulnerable to a nasty tumble, particularly if equities’ resurgence continues. “High margin debts show the effect of over-leveraging and mispricing of risk in our financial system,” says Scott Schermerhorn, chief investment officer for Choate Advisors, which runs about $2.7bn (£1.3bn, e1.9bn). “It indicates that, despite the August runoff, there’s still more problems out there. This will take a long time to work through the system.” Based on historical levels, margin debt makes the market look risky and subject to a sharp downtick right now. It comes to 2.4%of total adjusted-market capitalisation – 3.4 times its 62-year norm of 0.74%. “These are certainly not the kind of numbers you see at the beginning of a bull market,” says Ed Clissold, an analyst for Ned Davis Research. In July,margin debt hit an all-time high of $381bn. But as worries about sub-prime mortgage loans set off a credit crunch in August, more than $50bn of the debt was erased. Almost half of the margin drawdown came from brokerages such as Merrill Lynch, which called loans backing two Bear Stearns hedge funds.What is particularly worrying to some is that margin debt is just one tool available to investors seeking leverage these days. Options and futures make it easier than ever to obtain leverage. So the near-record margin numbers may understate the situation. “As financial markets have grown and become more diversified, margin has become one of many ways to finance securities, so it represents less of a proportion of finance than it used to,” says Henry Kaufman. The one-time chief economist of Salomon Brothers now heads Kaufman & Co, an investment management and financial consulting firm. Granted, recent structural changes that take into account an entire portfolio’s risk have contributed to the gains. If an investor is using options to hedge his risk, new rules give him the ability to borrow more because he has lowered the risk profile of his entire portfolio. But the new rules do nothing to minimise margin lending’s inherent conflicts of interest or its potential to send the market down sharply as it did in August in a cascade of margin calls. Brokers sometimes give investors little or no time to cough up more cash before they liquidate a portfolio at bargain-basement prices. A brokerage firm may force a margin call on the one hand, while helping set the price on the securities sold to meet it on the other." 

 

 

09 January 2013, Event: 1st MoM change in margin debt > 10%; DJ Newswire: "Margin Debt Soared in January; Sign of Top Nearing?"

"NYSE says margin debt jumped 10% in January alone to $364 billion, 32% higher than a year earlier and the third-highest ever, trailing just June and July 2007. The previous instances, of course, came just a couple months before US stocks last topped out before the ongoing rally, with margin then peaking at $381 billion. So it's pretty clear where the record January rush of cash into equity products came from. Now, what happens if things get a little frisky and some margin debt turns into margin calls?"

 

 

06 May 2013, Event: All-time high margin debt (Jul-2007) crossed (1/2); The Wall Street Journal: “NYSE Margin Debt Raises Eyebrows”

“High levels of margin debt on the New York Stock Exchange are raising concerns about the state of the rally. Stephen Suttmeier, technical research analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, notes leverage, as measured by NYSE margin debt, rose 28% in March from a year ago to $380 billion. That figure is slightly below the July 2007 peak of $381 billion.Market analysts track margin-debt activity as an indication of investors’ appetite for taking on speculative trading. It has been trending higher since bottoming out during the financial crisis and currently is hovering around all-time highs. “Leverage can be used as a sentiment indicator because it is related to investor confidence… Although it should not be used as a market timing tool, the implication is contrarian bearish,” Suttmeier says. ”Peaks in NYSE margin debt preceded peaks in the S&P 500 in both 2007 and 2000.” It's no surprise people have been taking on more risk as the market has moved to record highs. But the question is what happens when the easy ride higher turns south and some of that margin debt turns into margin calls? A potential pitfall for those trading "on margin" is a sharp decline in stock prices, which can expose investors to margin calls, requiring them to post additional collateral lest their brokers sell their securities to cover the debt. A wave of margin calls can worsen selling pressure on stocks and was seen as partly to blame for the market's woes during the financial crisis. "It's rather alarming to see NYSE margin debt just shy of its all-time high as of the March reading," Cullen Roche of Orcam Financial Group wrote on the Pragmatic Capitalism blog (hat tip Business Insider). "My guess is we've actually already surpassed the all-time high though we won't officially know until April data is released. Fun times knowing we live in a world that is built on such a fragile foundation." 

 

 

31 May 2013, Event: All-time high margin debt (Jul-2007) crossed (2/2):The New York Times “Shades of 2007 Borrowing”
 
“AMERICAN investors have taken out more margin loans than ever before. That indicates that speculative investing has grown among retail investors, reaching levels that in the past indicated the market was getting to unsustainable levels and might be in for a fall. […]It was the first time the total had surpassed the 2007 peak of $381 billion, a peak that was followed by the Great Recession and credit crisis. […][T]he last time the Fed adjusted the  margin rules was in 1974, when it reduced the down payment required for stocks to 50 percent of the purchase price, from 65 percent.  …]Nonetheless,margin loans have r
emained popular among many individual investors, who tend to raise their borrowings during times of market optimism and to reduce them when markets are falling. Thus the margin debt levels now may provide an indication of popular enthusiasm for investments.” 

 

 

27 June 2013, Event: All-time high margin debt (Jul-2007) crossed = Did margin debt peak already? (1/2); Reuters: "U.S. stock market margin debt falls in May from record April level"

"The value of U.S. equities investors bought with borrowed money fell 1.7 percent in May from the previous month's record high, marking the first monthly decline in margin debt in nearly a year. Margin debt accounts totaled $401.6 billion in May, down from a record $408.7 billion in April, data from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority showed on Thursday. The level had increased every month since a 2.3 percent drop between June and July 2012. Margin debt is one way to measure how much risk hedge funds and other large investors are taking to enhance their returns through the use of borrowed cash. Extremely high readings are seen as a gauge of overly bullish sentiment. In April, the New York Stock Exchange reported margin debt hit $384.4 billion, surpassing the previous record of $381.4 billion in July 2007. On Thursday, the NYSE said its share of the May total was $377 billion." 

 

 

27 June 2013, Event: All-time high margin debt (Jul-2007) crossed = Did margin debt peak already? (2/2); ARMNET: "Record margin debt points to a far wider Wall Street Crash coming soon"

"Don’t even think about jumping back into US stocks after the recent modest sell-off. If margin debt is any guide, and historically it has been an excellent guide then what we have just seen is just a warning of a much biggerWall Street crash around the corner. The last time margin debt was at present levels was at a previous peak in July 2007 at $381 billion, just before the global financial crisis struck. Yes it is hard to believe that confidence was that high in stocks just at the wrong moment. Record margin debt: It is the same story now. In March 2013 NYSE margin debt totaled $380 billion. You do not need to be much of a financial analyst to spot almost an exact parallel. But what you should also understand is that margin debt works in both directions. It accelerates the upside in stocks by allowing punters to buy with borrowed money but then it accelerates the drop in a stock market by taking it away from them. How does it do that? Well think about it. If you owe money then you will be forced to sell a perfectly good asset in a falling market to pay off your debt, and that sale accelerates the fall in stock prices. Besides with the bond market weakening the cost of margin debt is going up. That will also be triggering liquidation of this debt with an obvious impact on stock prices supported by this borrowing. […] The current weakness in gold and silver is also a sign of a coming crash in all major financial assets. Once the weaker investment holders of gold and silver have finished selling precious metals they will continue with other assets, and margin account requirements will force them to liquidate US stocks. Stock market crash: We think the sell-off of precious metals is almost done but it has hardly started with the overinflated US stock market. A historically high US price-to-earnings ratio still anticipates an economic recovery that is just not coming through. US GDP growth in the first quarter was revised down from 2.4 to 1.8 per cent, after the negative fourth quarter. The only economic recovery is in house prices and the stock market, both inflated by cheap money courtesy of the Fed. Rising mortgage rates are going to ditch the housing recovery and rising margin costs will do for the US stock market. Welcome to the liquidation sale of the century!"

 

* * *

This time must be different.

 

 

 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/dMjVDelXM8w/story01.htm Tyler Durden

How The Fed Is Keeping Warm This Winter

What is an aspiring market manipulator to do on those cold winter mornings in the 9th floor trading hub of Liberty 33, when the heat emitted by the money printer is not enough to keep one warm, and when repeatedly punching the “buy” button has lost its heat-generating, full body workout bliss? Wear this of course.

h/t @ljuti


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/stz6AyUE1vQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Low Growth in the Developed World… Increasing Capital Flight to Asia!

By: Chris Tell at http://capitalistexploits.at/

The first wave of modern globalization took place during 1870-1913, when both capital and labour moved freely across international borders. Things have changed a lot since then as ever increasing restrictions have emerged for capital mobility, due in part to a surge in nationalism and increasing levels of government interference in both domestic and international capital flows.

 Ever since the Bretton-Woods system, which emerged out of World War II, abandoned the dollar-gold standard, capital mobility has surged.

Figure 1: Net Foreign Private Sector Capital Flow in Asia (Percentage of GDP, Q4 moving average)?Source: IMF, Balance of Payments Statistics

Figure 1: Net Foreign Private Sector Capital Flow in Asia (Percentage of GDP, Q4 moving average)?Source: IMF, Balance of Payments Statistics

During the last decade net capital flows from the developed economies in Europe and North America have flown into emerging economies in Asia at a record pace. Beside the brief dips during the Asian Financial Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis, starting in 1997 and 2007, capital inflows to Asia have remained constant (Figure 1).

The “cheap money” generated by the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Quantitative Easing, and European Central Banks Long Term Refinancing Operations have found better returns in emerging economies in Asia, including the NIEs. Amid low interest rates offered by the Central Banks across developed economies, the trend has only solidified in recent years with capital inflows in Asia reaching an average of 4 percent of GDP in 2010. This is the first time since the start of the Asian Financial Crisis that such levels have been reached.

Also, as developed economies are slowing down, the risk adjusted rate of return of capital in these countries is low. Compare this to the high growth potential in the emerging Asian tigers.

 

Figure 2: Distribution of Capital Inflows by Country Source: IMF, Balance of Payments Statistics

Figure 2: Distribution of Capital Inflows by Country
Source: IMF, Balance of Payments Statistics

While the composition of capital flows are obviously different among Asian countries, as a basket (Figure 2), Asean-5 economies and NIEs have attracted the bulk of the disruptive capital flight after the global economic crisis. Also, these inflows serve different purposes in different economies. For example, Hong Kong attracted a large portion of banking flows while India’s inflows mostly went into portfolio-centric investments.

In order to minimize risk, the majority of the inflow funds in Asia are being invested with portfolio centric asset classes such as real estate and equity markets instead of Greenfield operations; witness the now unbelievable real estate values in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia’s cities and to a lesser extent Bangkok. This has created concerns regarding how to minimize the inflow spillover into asset markets in Asia in order to prevent another bubble.

Too late for that I’d say.

Additionally, these inflows are creating synthetic demand for local currencies in Asia which in turn have an effect of eating into the competitiveness of these economies as foreign exchange rates surge against global major currencies such as the US Dollar, Yen and the Euro.

The problems arising from these abnormalities of capital inflows in Asia has created its own set of problems, and regulatory restrictions are being imposed across the region to curb the externalities, such as diffusing asset bubbles.

Malaysia for example is imposing a 30% tax on real estate, which is seeing a rush to exit by domestic players. Interestingly I’ve still seen western investors continue to rush in. I can only guess they don’t read the tax codes when deciding if they want that nice villa in Kota Kinabalu.

On the other hand, central bankers in the developed economies are living with a looming fear of a liquidity trap as these Asian economies are booming at their expense instead of creating sustainable growth at home.

Rocks and hard places…and the music plays on.

– Chris

 

“There are few options for emerging market countries to control the impact of capital inflows.” – Kristen Forbes, MIT Sloan School of Management


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Ov4mWgwbsb4/story01.htm Capitalist Exploits

Citi “Bullish” Gold And Silver

Yesterday’s daily reversal in gold and silver has prompted Citi’s FX Technicals group into a bullish position targeting $1,335 for gold in the short-term.

 

Via Citi FX Technicals,

Silver marginally overshot the 76.4% retracement of the rally from the trend lows in May on the log scale chart

This retracement level came in at $19.65

Additionally Silver posted a bullish daily reversal and momentum has also crossed up from stretched levels

A close above $20.50-62 would add weight to these bullish indications

 

Gold also posted a bullish daily reversal at the lows yesterday

The candle is somewhat similar to that seen on 15 October (although that was not a reversal day so yesterday’s price action is more aggressive)

From the 15 October interim lows, Gold rallied $110 over 10 sessions.

The same this time if seen would put gold at $1,335.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/qN-BujYwWwg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Citi "Bullish" Gold And Silver

Yesterday’s daily reversal in gold and silver has prompted Citi’s FX Technicals group into a bullish position targeting $1,335 for gold in the short-term.

 

Via Citi FX Technicals,

Silver marginally overshot the 76.4% retracement of the rally from the trend lows in May on the log scale chart

This retracement level came in at $19.65

Additionally Silver posted a bullish daily reversal and momentum has also crossed up from stretched levels

A close above $20.50-62 would add weight to these bullish indications

 

Gold also posted a bullish daily reversal at the lows yesterday

The candle is somewhat similar to that seen on 15 October (although that was not a reversal day so yesterday’s price action is more aggressive)

From the 15 October interim lows, Gold rallied $110 over 10 sessions.

The same this time if seen would put gold at $1,335.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/qN-BujYwWwg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

White House Still Trying to Spin Obamacare, EU Wants Spying Protection, Judge to Rule on Detroit Bankruptcy: P.M. Links

  • A lovely celebration of complete economic failureRealizing the national news
    media is no longer cooperating with positive coverage about the
    Obamacare rollout, the Obama Administration is turning to
    local news media
    instead. They are also working to coordinate a
    media strategy with
    health care groups
    . They still seem to think that the their
    messaging is the problem, don’t they?
  • The European Union is seeking stronger protection against

    U.S. surveillance
    and the right to sue if their data is abused.
    Ha ha ha! Like Americans can currently sue if their data
    is abused.
  • A judge will rule on Dec. 3 whether
    to allow Detroit to declare bankruptcy
    .
  • A federal judge will allow a
    lesbian couple in Illinois to get married
    ahead of the actual
    day their new recognition law takes effect because one of the women
    is terminally ill.
  • Following the negotiations in Iran, Obama is now asking for the
    release a
    former FBI agent
    who disappeared there in 2007.
  • The Obama Administration is calling for a
    crackdown on political campaigning
    by tax-exempt non-profit
    groups. So Organizing for Action is closing its doors when?

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7
content 
widgets for your
websites.

Follow us on Facebook
and Twitter,
and don’t forget to
sign
up
 for Reason’s daily updates for more
content.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/26/white-house-still-trying-to-spin-obamaca
via IFTTT

Matthew Feeney on Scrapping the Welfare State and Giving People Free Money

The Swiss are set to
vote on whether their country should introduce a basic
national income of 2,500 Swiss Francs ($2,800) a month for every
adult, regardless of their salary or net worth. Although the
particular proposal in Switzerland may not be ideal, that does not
mean, Matthew Feeney argues, that libertarians should shy away from
proposing something similar. Being morally comfortable with some
degree of government wealth redistribution might be contrary to
anarchism, but it is not contrary to libertarianism. Were
libertarians to argue for replacing the current welfare system with
a basic national income we would be better positioned to highlight
that libertarianism is not the heartless and selfish philosophy it
is commonly portrayed as, and it would allow for a more
humane and effective way to deliver welfare than the
current system on offer.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/26/matthew-feeney-on-why-we-should-scrap-th
via IFTTT