The QE Experiment is Failing… Will Stocks Crash?

 

We’ve long maintained that Japan is ground zero for the “QE works vs QE doesn’t work” debate.

The Fed’s economic models, and 99% of the economic models employed by Central Banks in general, believe that monetary easing can bring about an economic recovery. The primary argument for this crowd if QE has thus far failed to produce a recovery is that the QE efforts have not been big enough.

And then there’s Japan. In a nation with GDP of $5.96 trillion, the Bank of Japan has launched a $1.4 trillion QE effort: a monetary move equal to 23% of Japan’s GDP.

To put this into perspective, this would be akin to the US’s Federal Reserve announcing a QE effort of over $3 trillion.

Suffice to say, Japan’s QE most certainly should be considered “enough” by even the most pro-QE supporter. But the very problem is that it does not appear to be having the intended effects.

The following is an article from the Wall Street Journal. I’ve highlighted a few choice items for your review:

At Koeido Co., a 156-year-old sweets maker based in this city in southwest Japan, chairman Shuichi Takeda says he feels the country may finally be coming out of a 20-year funk.

Sales of Koeido's sweet millet dumplings are holding up. The company is spending around 80 million yen ($800,000) to renovate two shops—a sign of how Japan's economy is showing signs of life, lifted in part by a flood of easy money from the central bank that has boosted stocks and helped spur growth.

But with future demand unclear, and costs for imported sugar rising, Koeido still isn't bullish enough to take out bigger loans to replace equipment or expand its business—even though banks are begging it to borrow more.

"The economy doesn't necessarily get better just because of monetary easing," says Mr. Takeda. "And you don't borrow just because rates are low."…

It is an attempt to literally crowd banks and other investors out of the market and force them to put their money to work in other ways—through loans or investments in real estate, for example—to help stimulate the economy…

"The idea that the Bank of Japan will buy bonds, and then the extra money will start flooding into corporate or retail loans—that's just a theoretical exercise,'' says Chugoku's Mr. Miyanaga. "Most important is [for the government] to hurry up and produce a concrete growth strategy, which will spur private economic activity."

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304470504579163094082999108

I want to point out that the individuals who are expressing basic common sense views about monetary policy and the economy are businesspeople who run actual businesses, NOT academics.

This is what happens when academic monetary theory meets reality: theory proves to be just that theory.

There are some perceived benefits (the markets rally) from the easy money high. But the inevitable hangover is usually intense (see 2000-2001 and 2007-2008).

So stocks rally for now. But eventually this will end. In fact it may come sooner rather than later.

Remember 2008? Everyone said everything was just fine… right up until the Crash hit.

We're seeing the same warnings in the markets now. The time to prepare is BEFORE it hits.

 

For a FREE Special Report outlining how to protect your portfolio from this, swing by: http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html

 

Best Regards

Phoenix Capital Research 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/7OL7hpWXM9s/story01.htm Phoenix Capital Research

OECD Warns UK Faces Housing Bubble

The U.K. faces a housing-market bubble unless the government boosts the supply of new homes, the OECD warned yesterday. U.K. home values have climbed 36.6% since 2004, the seventh-biggest rise among OECD nations and back near their 2007/8 bubble highs. The Bank of England said last week mortgage approvals had surpassed 60,000-a-month six months earlier than it had predicted. As Bloomberg’s Niraj Shah notes, while the OECD raised its forecasts for U.K. economic growth, it said risks to the recovery include “vigorous” house-price increases that may curtail affordability. We are sure this will all end well – a speculative real estate bubble as the key driver of nominal economic growth? What could go wrong?… Is it any wonder that UK realtors see the crash coming and are asking the government to step back from this policy-induced euphoria?

 

 

Chart: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/lWY3qo_cAf8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The American Style of Paranoid Politics

My latest contribution to JFK Week — it’s like Shark Week, but
it happens every 10 years instead of every summer — is an article
for CNN called “The
Roots of American Conspiracy Theories
.” Here’s an excerpt:

Why does it always have to be a picture of MY book? This is a pretty good one too.America is not unusually
suspicious. Conspiracy stories flourish all over the world, some of
them far less plausible than the notion that more than one man was
involved in the King or Kennedy killing. As I write, Europe is
undergoing one of its
periodic panics
about international child-stealing gypsy
conspiracies. Over the summer, the prime minister of Turkey

blamed a global plot
for the protests against his government.
Last year, the host of Nigerian Idol
lashed out
at the local press for reporting that he was a
high-ranking member of the Illuminati. In Iran, it is apparently
considered savvy to
claim that the Holocaust was a hoax
. The fear of conspiracy
isn’t the property of any one nation — it’s more like a universal
human trait.

But if Americans are not unique in being suspicious, it’s true that
we can be suspicious in distinctive ways. Every country’s
conspiracy stories reflect that country’s culture, and that’s as
true of the United States as any place else. There is an American
style of paranoid politics.

You can read the rest
here
.

I also have a cameo in
this
report about the Kennedy assassination. And I’ll be
talking
about all this stuff
on the public radio show Radio
West
at 11 a.m. Mountain Time today; you can tune in to that
here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/20/the-american-style-of-paranoid-politics
via IFTTT

What “Car Salesman” Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

From Simon Black of Sovereign Man

What Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

Last night I attended a private function put on by the National Economists Club where the guest of honor was none other than Ben Bernanke. You can read his full speech to the attendees here.

Meanwhile, I’m still trying to figure out how a guy with my views was even allowed in the room. 

But since I was already scheduled to be in the US this week to speak at a conference in Miami, I jumped at the chance to enjoy Bistro Filet and economic doublethink.

I’ve always wanted to find out for myself– does this man actually believe that printing money is the path to prosperity?

As it turns out, he does believe it.

At one point during the evening, when pressed about whether his Quantitative Easing program was good for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, he flat out denied it, saying that such a premise is “simply not true”.

He defended his printing $85 billion per month, suggesting that fixing interest rates at zero is beneficial for society because, among other things, it allows people to ‘buy cars’.

I saw these words coming out of his mouth and thought to myself, “Is this guy f’ing serious?” Cars. Wow. As if going into debt to purchase a rapidly depreciating consumer item is somehow a victory for the people.

Fixing interest rates at zero screws responsible people who save.

My mother, for example, is completely risk averse. She holds the entirety of her savings in a bank account, and nobody can convince her otherwise.

What she doesn’t realize is that the interest rate she receives is below the rate of inflation. So year after year, the purchasing power of her savings declines.

This point seemed completely lost on the Chairman.

He also dismissed the Fed’s role in the growing wealth gap here in the Land of the Free.

As we’ve discussed before, recently published data show that the US wealth gap is at its highest point since 1929.

For this, the chairman blames trade globalization, saying that the wealth gap is a ‘complicated phenomenon’.

He also stated flat out that there’s ‘not much the Federal Reserve can do about long-term trends like [the wealth gap] that don’t have much to do with monetary policy.’

Right. Keeping interest rates at zero so that bankers and the ultra-wealthy can see their portfolios rise to record levels while the middle class gets hosed by rising costs of medical care, education, food, and fuel has nothing to do with monetary policy.

This may have been the most intellectually disingenuous thing I heard all night.

Mr. Bernanke also made it quite clear that they were going to keep printing no matter what.

In his own words, he told the story about how they had tried issuing forward guidance… first suggesting that Quantitative Easing would last through 2013. Then they changed it to 2014. Then 2015.

Finally they changed the target altogether, announcing that they had set a threshold for the unemployment rate of 6.5%… but that this figure was just a ‘threshold’, not a ‘trigger’.

In other words, even if the official unemployment rate moves below 6.5%, the Fed isn’t going to end QE. They will at that point START to look at other data, like the Labor Force Participation Rate (which is at its worst level since 1978).

He also hinted that their unemployment threshold was not set in stone… which I took as a sign that they would probably lower this threshold even more, paving the way for several more years of printing.

And even if they do let up on Quantitative Easing, he stated very plainly that the Fed would still likely keep its target interest rate at zero.

Bottom line, it’s not going to end… at least, not voluntarily. It’s going to take a full-blown currency crisis before the Fed gets a whiff of reality. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZSWJ54jrdaA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

What "Car Salesman" Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

From Simon Black of Sovereign Man

What Ben Bernanke Said At Dinner Last Night

Last night I attended a private function put on by the National Economists Club where the guest of honor was none other than Ben Bernanke. You can read his full speech to the attendees here.

Meanwhile, I’m still trying to figure out how a guy with my views was even allowed in the room. 

But since I was already scheduled to be in the US this week to speak at a conference in Miami, I jumped at the chance to enjoy Bistro Filet and economic doublethink.

I’ve always wanted to find out for myself– does this man actually believe that printing money is the path to prosperity?

As it turns out, he does believe it.

At one point during the evening, when pressed about whether his Quantitative Easing program was good for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, he flat out denied it, saying that such a premise is “simply not true”.

He defended his printing $85 billion per month, suggesting that fixing interest rates at zero is beneficial for society because, among other things, it allows people to ‘buy cars’.

I saw these words coming out of his mouth and thought to myself, “Is this guy f’ing serious?” Cars. Wow. As if going into debt to purchase a rapidly depreciating consumer item is somehow a victory for the people.

Fixing interest rates at zero screws responsible people who save.

My mother, for example, is completely risk averse. She holds the entirety of her savings in a bank account, and nobody can convince her otherwise.

What she doesn’t realize is that the interest rate she receives is below the rate of inflation. So year after year, the purchasing power of her savings declines.

This point seemed completely lost on the Chairman.

He also dismissed the Fed’s role in the growing wealth gap here in the Land of the Free.

As we’ve discussed before, recently published data show that the US wealth gap is at its highest point since 1929.

For this, the chairman blames trade globalization, saying that the wealth gap is a ‘complicated phenomenon’.

He also stated flat out that there’s ‘not much the Federal Reserve can do about long-term trends like [the wealth gap] that don’t have much to do with monetary policy.’

Right. Keeping interest rates at zero so that bankers and the ultra-wealthy can see their portfolios rise to record levels while the middle class gets hosed by rising costs of medical care, education, food, and fuel has nothing to do with monetary policy.

This may have been the most intellectually disingenuous thing I heard all night.

Mr. Bernanke also made it quite clear that they were going to keep printing no matter what.

In his own words, he told the story about how they had tried issuing forward guidance… first suggesting that Quantitative Easing would last through 2013. Then they changed it to 2014. Then 2015.

Finally they changed the target altogether, announcing that they had set a threshold for the unemployment rate of 6.5%… but that this figure was just a ‘threshold’, not a ‘trigger’.

In other words, even if the official unemployment rate moves below 6.5%, the Fed isn’t going to end QE. They will at that point START to look at other data, like the Labor Force Participation Rate (which is at its worst level since 1978).

He also hinted that their unemployment threshold was not set in stone… which I took as a sign that they would probably lower this threshold even more, paving the way for several more years of printing.

And even if they do let up on Quantitative Easing, he stated very plainly that the Fed would still likely keep its target interest rate at zero.

Bottom line, it’s not going to end… at least, not voluntarily. It’s going to take a full-blown currency crisis before the Fed gets a whiff of reality. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZSWJ54jrdaA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

It’s Bullard’s Turn To Pour Cold Water On Stock Ramp, Says December Taper Possible, Considers Negative Rates As Well

First it was Carl Icahn, then Larry Fink, and now it is Fed “bellwether” Bullard who take the ECB’s NIRP and doubles down with a “Taper”… and NIRP

  • BULLARD SAYS THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS JOBS PICTURE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS QUESTION IS WHETHER JOBS PICKUP SUSTAINABLE
  • BULLARD SAYS A STRONG JOBS REPORT FOR NOVEMBER WOULD INCREASE PROSPECT TO TAPER IN BOND BUYING IN DECEMBER

Yeah, everyone is falling for that one again. Sure. For now however, EURUSD is buying it, and is down 100 pips on the combined action of the NIRP rumor and the possibilty of a December Taper.

 

But the punchline in the aftermath of the ECB rumor on just this is that the Fed just doubled down on the ECB’s ownc currency war gambit:

  • BULLARD WOULD LIKE STUDY OF NEGATIVE RATE FOR EXCESS RESERVES

In other words, it will soon cost everyone to keep money with the bank. As for NIRP on reserves: will banks consider lending out reserves if they have to pay a whopping 25 bps on amounts when they can use the same reserves as deposit-based collateral to buy ES and generate 20% annual returns via the S&P? Why no. They would not.

Finally, we would like to clarify that we were only joking when last night we tweeted that …


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/S4FA7JwQp8s/story01.htm Tyler Durden

It's Bullard's Turn To Pour Cold Water On Stock Ramp, Says December Taper Possible, Considers Negative Rates As Well

First it was Carl Icahn, then Larry Fink, and now it is Fed “bellwether” Bullard who take the ECB’s NIRP and doubles down with a “Taper”… and NIRP

  • BULLARD SAYS THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS JOBS PICTURE LOOKING BETTER
  • BULLARD SAYS QUESTION IS WHETHER JOBS PICKUP SUSTAINABLE
  • BULLARD SAYS A STRONG JOBS REPORT FOR NOVEMBER WOULD INCREASE PROSPECT TO TAPER IN BOND BUYING IN DECEMBER

Yeah, everyone is falling for that one again. Sure. For now however, EURUSD is buying it, and is down 100 pips on the combined action of the NIRP rumor and the possibilty of a December Taper.

 

But the punchline in the aftermath of the ECB rumor on just this is that the Fed just doubled down on the ECB’s ownc currency war gambit:

  • BULLARD WOULD LIKE STUDY OF NEGATIVE RATE FOR EXCESS RESERVES

In other words, it will soon cost everyone to keep money with the bank. As for NIRP on reserves: will banks consider lending out reserves if they have to pay a whopping 25 bps on amounts when they can use the same reserves as deposit-based collateral to buy ES and generate 20% annual returns via the S&P? Why no. They would not.

Finally, we would like to clarify that we were only joking when last night we tweeted that …


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/S4FA7JwQp8s/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Healthcare.gov is Hacker-Bait, Say Security Experts

Healthcare.govAs it now exists,
Healthcare.gov, the federal exchange for approved health plans,
“creates massive opportunity for fraud, scams, deceptive trade
practices, identity theft and more,” Morgan Wright, CEO, Crowd
Sourced Investigations, LLC told the House Science, Space, and
Technology committee in a
hearing held yesterday
. He was only one of several
cybersecurity experts who testified as to the vulnerabilities of
the already infamous Website, launched October 1 as part of the
rollout of Obamacare. Perhaps the onlly saving grace is the
frequency with which Healthcare.goc crashes, dissuading people from
entering infortion, or even making use impossible, and so sparing
them the high risk of data theft.

In his
testimony
(PDF), Wright said:

The first major issue is the lack of, and inability to conduct,
an end to end security test on the production system. The number of
contractors and absence of an apparent overall security lead
indicates no one was in possession of a comprehensive, top down
view of the full security posture. 3For a system dealing with what
will be one of the largest collections of PII, and certain to be
the target of malicious attacks and intrusions, the lack of a
clearly defined and qualified security lead is inconsistent with
accepted practices.

Wright pointed to a flaw involving the management of names and
passwords, discovered by a private security researcher, that would
have allowed hacke to take control of people’s accounts. That hole
has been fixed, but others have been assigned a fix date of May 31,
2014—while the Website remains up and running.

This is completely unacceptable from an industry perspective,
and is in extreme contravention of security best practices. Only in
the government could such a gaping hole be allowed to exi st
without fear of consequence. This shows a lack of understanding for
the consequences to consumers and the protection of also creates
massive opportunity for fraud, scams, deceptive trade practices,
identity theft and more. Much of this is playing out right now.

Avi Rubin, professor of Computer Science at Johns Hopkins
University,
pointed out
(PDF), “One cannot build a system and add security
later any more than you can construct a building and then add the
plumbing and duct work afterwards.” He then discussed the
challenges faced in necessarily doing exactly that with the federal
exchange.

Dr. Frederick R. Chang, Bobby B. Lyle Centennial Distinguished
Chair in Cyber Security Southern Methodist University, was
similarly critical
(PDF).

The fact that there is not one single place to sign up for
health care coverage will lead to confusion by the public. There is
the main federal site, individual state sites, as well as
legitimate third party sites. As I understand it , there is no
official designation or marking that a consumer can use to
determine whether they are on the correct site or not. As people
seek to register for health care coverage they may find that there
are a dizzying array of websites to select from. When it comes to
typing in information like a social security number into a web
form, many people might be cautious about doing so, but given that
it has do with health insurance coverage people might be more
inclined to do so (particularly if they think the request is coming
from a legitimate website). These two factors could combine to
create a ripe circumstance for personal information to get into the
wrong hands. It is difficult to estimate how much traffic these
fake websites will siphon off, but it could be significant

David Kennedy, CEO and Founder of TrustedSec,
cautioned
(PDF) that existing reports of hacking attempts on
Healthcare.gov are incomplete and that, because of poor security
precautions, “in the event that the website is hacked (or already
has been), the attacks would go largely unnoticed and the website
would remain compromised for a long period of time.” He went on to
detail a series of vulnerabilities his company discovereon the
site, and then alluded to others he said he was unwilling to
publicly reveal.

Kennedy recommended building an entirely new Healthcare.gov
website while the first one is up and running (including its flaws)
and replacing the existing one when it’s ready. If, instead, the
already bought and paid-for site is taken down for a full fix, “the
remediation process will span seven to twelve months at a
minimum.”

Fixing the exisiting site while it’s being used would take even
longer.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/20/healthcaregov-is-hacker-bait-say-securit
via IFTTT

Would You Like to Give Your Blood and Saliva to a Nameless Official for No Apparent Reason?

Would you like to anonymously tell this government official standing directly in front of you if you're currently breaking the law?The federal government is
spending $8 million on a study to determine the number of drunken
or drug-impaired drivers on the road. The way the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration decided to make this scientific
calculation is causing some concern: They’re apparently forcibly
pulling cars over en masse and asking them to “voluntarily” give
them some blood or saliva to test.

It happened in Fort Worth, Texas, recently, prompting at least
local one woman to ask, “WTF?” Courtesy of NBC’s Dallas-Fort Worth

affiliate
:

“It just doesn’t seem right that you can be forced off the road
when you’re not doing anything wrong,” said Kim Cope, who said she
was on her lunch break when she was forced to pull over at the
roadblock on Beach Street in North Fort Worth.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which is
spending $7.9 million on the survey over three years, said
participation was “100 percent voluntary” and anonymous.

But Cope said it didn’t feel voluntary to her — despite signs
saying it was.

“I gestured to the guy in front that I just wanted to go
straight, but he wouldn’t let me and forced me into a parking
spot,” she said.

Once parked, she couldn’t believe what she was asked next.

“They were asking for cheek swabs,” she said. “They would give
$10 for that. Also, if you let them take your blood, they would pay
you $50 for that.”

Government science at works, folks. Cope said she submitted to a
breath test because she “felt trapped.”

NBC turned to a local civil liberties attorney who looked at the
forms given to those who had been pulled over. It turned out the
claim that participation was voluntary was nonsense, even beyond
Cope and others being forced into the parking lot. The form stated
that drivers were tested by “passive alcohol sensor readings before
the consent process has been completed.”

In addition, the NHTSA hired off-duty local police officers to
man the roadblock, so attempting to convince drivers that their
participation to test to see if they were currently breaking the
law was completely anonymous probably did not pan out well for
them. A column in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram
noted
that a previous similar effort in 2007 had one out of six
drivers declining to participate. That seems like a high enough
refusal rate to throw any actual figures the agency comes up with
into question.

The NHTSA has done similar studies throughout the years since
the ‘70s. You can access their previous results
here
and determine for yourself it this is anything more than
creepy government busywork. The tests show a pretty significant
decline in the number of folks testing positive for alcohol while
behind the wheel since they started these surveys, and hardly
anybody was showing high levels of alcohol in their system during
the daytime in 2007. Their own previous results makes the delaying
of people on their lunch breaks all the more annoying.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/20/would-you-like-to-give-your-blood-and-sa
via IFTTT

EUR Collapses As ECB ‘Strawmans’ Negative Rates (Again)

Given our earlier comment on the collapse of European earnings, it is perhaps unsurprisng that the CEB is throwing everything at the problem of a strong EUR:

  • *ECB SAID TO WEIGH MINUS 0.1% DEPOSIT RATE IF MORE EASING NEEDED

Of course, we await the official denial but suspect this is nothing more than attempt to gauge market response to the policy idea (just as Draghi did in May). For now, EURUSD has dumped to 1.3480, and US equities are soaring…

Reaction:

 

 

Deja Vu:

  • May 2, 2013: DRAGHI SAYS ECB HAS OPEN MIND ON NEGATIVE DEPOSIT RATE

And the rapid response when the reaction was seen last time:

European Central Bank Governing Council Member Ewald Nowotny told CNBC on Friday that the markets over-interpreted ECB President Mario Draghi's comments on negative deposit rates at Thursday's press conference. "Well I think the markets over-interpreted this point. Of course, there is always some kind of technical discussion about it but there is no specific plan in that direction," Nowotny said in Bratislava. "I personally think this is something where one really has to analyze very carefully the effects, side effects, psychological effects so this is not something that is of relevance in the immediate future."

 

But Nowotny said this was a "very sensitive issue" that would need "much more information, much more analysis than we have available at this moment." He warned it could in fact dry up the flow of credit. "This is one of the possible outcomes," he said.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bOn3xMGmnK0/story01.htm Tyler Durden