This Explains A Lot

Moments ago, the following news broke across various news feeds:

This is great news. But we wonder: considering the list of such prominent Econ department graduates as:

  • Ben Bernanke – professor of economics and public affairs, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board
  • Paul Krugman – professor of economics, New York Times columnist,
    winner of the John Bates Clark Medal, Nobel Prize in economics (2008)
  • Alan Blinder- Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, 1994–96

… couldn’t this vaccine have been distributed some years earlier?


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/mRtBhP4Dung/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: Personal Sacrifices: From JFK To The Federal Reserve

Submitted by Shawn Brown of SBrown & Asscociates,

The Senate Banking Committee’s confirmation hearing for current Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve began with Janet Yellen delivering prepared remarksMost observers likely tuned out well before the completion of the 2 ½ hours meeting to decide whether Yellen was worthy to succeed outgoing Chair Ben Bernanke and ascend to the top spot at the Fed. With the ongoing debacle of the Affordable Health Care website handcuffing Democrats, tough questions about QE, ZIRP, the oft talked about Taper and the possibility of reducing the Fed’s gargantuan $4 trillion balance sheet were verboten.  That left Republicans to address the elephant(s) in the room.  Predictably, it took nearly the entire hearing until a Senator from Nebraska offered his views about the damage being done by the various fiscal and monetary machinations undertaken to combat the Great Recession.  

What happened, beginning just after the 2 hour point of the meeting, was both remarkable and revealing.   Senator Mike Johanns, who won’t seek reelection, began by thanking Dr. Yellen for stopping by his office prior to the confirmation hearing.  Yellen appeared startled when Johanns suggests that he “would like to continue, if I could with a few questions along the lines of what we talked about in my office.”   Senator Johanns said,

I found your testimony about asset bubbles to be interesting, just before the Chairman turned to me, I looked at where the Dow was at, it’s about 15,850.  An economy that quite honestly most everybody would recognize has too much unemployment, an economy where people continue to struggle, an economy where it’s kind of hard to see where the growth is going to be.  We are now starting to see real estate bidding wars just like the old days…

 

Dr. Yellen I kind of look at these factors and I think I could go on and on with some other items and I must admit, what am I missing here?  I see asset bubbles and I think if you were to announce today that over the next 24 months you are going to bring that balance sheet down from $4 trillion to zero or $1 trillion, I think if you even said over the next 4 years we’re going to bring it down from $4trillion to zero you would see how big those asset bubbles are, wouldn’t you agree with me on that?”

For obvious reasons, Dr. Yellen doesn’t want any part of a discussion that might include the mention of slowing the $85 billion per month of asset purchases and therefore any talk of a normalization of the Fed’s balance sheet is out of the question.  Logically, Yellen decides to check her notes and offer that housing is rebounding in only the hardest hit markets like Las Vegas, Phoenix and her part of the country (San Francisco Bay Area) where a substantial fraction of borrowers were/are underwater.  Whether she is waiting for her confirmation to tackle questions related to exiting QE, normalizing interest rates and ultimately reducing the Fed’s balance sheet remains to be seen but Senator Johanns decided to press for more disclosure.

“Dr. Yellen, here is what I would offer and I think you would agree with me although you probably won’t want to agree with me in a public hearing setting.  But if I think if I were to say to you why don’t you announce today that you are going to draw this down over the next 24 months from $4 trillion to zero, I think you would see the impact of your policies on the value of real estate all across the United States not just in the hardest hit areas.  I think the real estate that I own and others own would go down in value.  I also think that the stock market would have the same sort of reaction that it has had when Chairman Bernanke just suggested that there might be a phase down here.

 

Here’s what I’m saying, I think the economy has gotten used to the sugar that you put out there and I just worry that we are on a sugar high and that is a very dangerous thing for the little person out there who is just trying to pay the bills and maybe put a buck away for retirement.  The last thing I will say, the flip side of your policies that you are advocating for are very, very hard on certain segments of our society.  You know, explain to the Senior Citizen who is just hoping that CD will earn some money so they don’t have to dig into the principal what impact you’re having on a policy that says for as far as the eye can see or foreseeable future keep interest rates low, they are hurt by that policy.”

Yellen’s candid admission was alarming, “I agree and I understand that savers are hurt by this policy (ZIRP, emphasis mine)… it is important to recognize that savers wear a lot of different hats, they play many different roles in the economy.”   Yellen invokes the spirit of the 35th President of the United States in her response to Senator Johanns’ accusations that Fed policies are robbing savers and Seniors, “They may be retirees who are hoping to get part-time work in order to supplement their income.  They may be people who have children who are out of work and who are suffering because of that or grandchildren who are going to college and coming out of college and hope to be able to put their skills to work…When those people who worry about our policies, thinking about themselves as savers, taking into account the broader array of interests they have even though they may harm them in that respect are broadly beneficial to them as I believe they are to all Americans.”

JFK, at his inauguration in 1961 said, “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.”  Janet Yellen is almost certainly going to be the next Chair of the Federal Reserve, her comments about self-sacrifice, especially for savers and Seniors should sound an alarm that something terrible this way comes. 

 

 

forward to 2:08:30 to watch this must see segment most missed.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0KzeQZitbkM/story01.htm Tyler Durden

“$8.5 TRILLION In Taxpayer Money Doled Out By Congress To The Pentagon Since 1996 … Has NEVER Been Accounted For”

We’ve repeatedly documented that military waste and fraud are the core problems with the U.S. economy.

For example, we’ve noted that we wouldn’t be in this crisis of hitting the debt ceiling in the first place if we hadn’t spent so much money on unnecessary wars … which are horrible for the economy.

But it goes far beyond actual fighting.  We could easily slash the military and security budget without reducing our national security.

For example, homeland security agencies wasted money on seminars like “Did Jesus Die for Klingons Too?” and training for a “zombie apocalypse” instead of actually focusing on anti-terror efforts.

Republican Senator Tom Coburn notes that the Department of Defense can reduce $67.9 billion over 10 years by eliminating the non-defense programs that have found their way into the budget for the Department of Defense.

BusinessWeek and Bloomberg point out that we could slash military spending without harming our national security. Indeed, we could slash boondoggles that even the generals don’t want.

BusinessWeek provides a list of cost-cutting measures which will not undermine national security. American Conservative does the same.

Moreover, we’ve shown that the military wastes and “loses” (cough) trillions of dollars.  See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

The former Secretary of Defense acknowledged in May 2012 that the DOD “is the only major federal agency that cannot pass an audit today.”  The Pentagon will not be ready for an audit for another five years, according to Panetta.

Reuters quantifies these numbers today:

The Pentagon is the only federal agency that has not complied with a law that requires annual audits of all government departments. That means that the $8.5 trillion in taxpayer money doled out by Congress to the Pentagon since 1996, the first year it was supposed to be audited, has never been accounted for. That sum exceeds the value of China’s economic output last year.

Bonus: 

Bill Clinton On NSA Spying: “We Are On The Verge Of Having The Worst Of All Worlds: We’ll Have No Security And No Privacy”

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/I_k0pjIQJ78/story01.htm George Washington

Cop Fires Shots at Minivan Full of Kids After Mom Flees Traffic Stop

Several New Mexico police officers are under investigation for a
routine traffic stop that devolved into a chaotic car chase last
month. In their attempt to apprehend an uncooperative driver, the
officers smashed a baton through the woman’s car window and fired
several bullets at the children-filled vehicle.

The incident was recorded by a police
dashcam video
, which was released last week to
KRQE News 13
. According to a report from
Taos News
, the incident started when a New Mexico State
police officer pulled over 39-year-old Oriana Ferrell for speeding
16 mph over the limit on a state highway. 

The officer (whose name has not been revealed) approached
Ferrell’s minivan in what appears to be a calm manner and told her
to wait while he returned to his vehicle. Ferrell then sped
off, starting a chase. When she pulled over again, the officer
returned to the driver’s side window visibly agitated.

From ABC
News
:

When the officer goes to the car a second time he opens the door
and demands that Ferrell get out of the car, yelling “Get out of
the vehicle right now!”

When she refuses, the officer appears to attempt to pull her out
of the car as her five children, ages 6 to 18, according
to The Taos News, start screaming in the car.

After a few moments, the woman’s 14-year-old son gets out of the
car and tries to engage the officer. But the officer pulls his
taser and the teenager goes back into the car.

Eventually the woman gets out of the car to talk to the officer,
but when he tells her to turn and face the vehicle she tries to run
back into the driver’s seat of the car. The incident quickly
escalates with the woman’s son this time engaging the officer. Only
after the officer aims his taser at the boy does he run back into
the van.

Then things got really intense.

As two back-up officers arrived on the scene, the officer
repeatedly smashed his baton through the passenger side window
shouting, “Open the door!”

At that point, Ferrell started to drive away. An officer who had
just arrived on the scene fired three shots at the back of the
minivan. According to a court document, the officer
allegedly
fired at the rear tires “in an attempt to keep the
vehicle from leaving.” (Despite the fact that police experts, such
as
Dr. Daniel Kennedy
and Rick
Parent
, claim that shooting out a moving vehicle’s
tires is often a dangerous and ineffective way to apprehend a
suspect.)

The officers pursued Ferrell in a high-speed chase, reaching 100
mph, until she stopped in front of a hotel and turned herself in.
Both Ferrell and her 14-year-old son were arrested at gunpoint
without incident.

Ferrell was arrested on five counts of abuse of a child,
aggravated fleeing of an officer, resisting an officer, reckless
driving and possession of drug paraphernalia (for two marijuana
pipes that were found in the car.) Her son was arrested for battery
of an officer. 

Ferrell’s attorney
argued
, “If someone ought to be charged with child abuse, it
ought to be the New Mexico State Police… We ought to talk about
the stupidity and recklessness of shooting at a car that has five
children in it.”

Watch the video below:

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/cop-fires-shots-at-minivan-full-of-kid
via IFTTT

The Nation *Gets* It: The Real Problem in Today’s America is Ayn Rand Cult

Over
at Mediaite
, Andrew
Kirell
notes The Nation’s holiday season subscription pitch,
which slags Ayn Rand thusly.

Har har har.

Because lord knows the real problem these days is the outsized
influence of the authoress of Atlas Shrugged.

Because as we all know that Rand wanted federal spending (under
Republicans and Democrats) to double in nominal terms and to end up
staying above $3.5 trillion a year; she hoped that a liberal
progressive president would declare the right to unilaterally kill
anyone he says is a threat to the good ol’ U.S. of A.; she lobbied
for a conservative-majority Supreme Court to rule that the
government can’t just regulate whatever existing commere there is
but can force also force citizens to engage in commerce; and like
The Nation in a recent article, she fretted that the Communist
Chinese
are insidiously taking over the American university
system.

Yeah, Ayn Rand and good old Uncle Norm are the problem in
21st-century America!

Do yourself – and Reason – a favor and subscribe to the magazine of
Free Minds and Free Markets
. It’s less than $15 a year and it
goes to keep the lights burning bright here at Reason.com.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/the-nation-gets-it-the-real-problem-in-t
via IFTTT

The Nation *Gets* It: The Real Problem in Today's America is Ayn Rand Cult

Over
at Mediaite
, Andrew
Kirell
notes The Nation’s holiday season subscription pitch,
which slags Ayn Rand thusly.

Har har har.

Because lord knows the real problem these days is the outsized
influence of the authoress of Atlas Shrugged.

Because as we all know that Rand wanted federal spending (under
Republicans and Democrats) to double in nominal terms and to end up
staying above $3.5 trillion a year; she hoped that a liberal
progressive president would declare the right to unilaterally kill
anyone he says is a threat to the good ol’ U.S. of A.; she lobbied
for a conservative-majority Supreme Court to rule that the
government can’t just regulate whatever existing commere there is
but can force also force citizens to engage in commerce; and like
The Nation in a recent article, she fretted that the Communist
Chinese
are insidiously taking over the American university
system.

Yeah, Ayn Rand and good old Uncle Norm are the problem in
21st-century America!

Do yourself – and Reason – a favor and subscribe to the magazine of
Free Minds and Free Markets
. It’s less than $15 a year and it
goes to keep the lights burning bright here at Reason.com.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/the-nation-gets-it-the-real-problem-in-t
via IFTTT

Casino Magnate Openly Wants to Use Feds to Destroy Internet Competition

Why would you ever gamble online and give up the chance to ride in a boat across a wading pool in 100-degree temperatures?Imagine if McDonald’s, rather
than attempting to add
chicken wings
to their menu, instead tried to deal with their
fast food competitors by trying to outlaw KFC. Who knows – maybe
they’d try if they thought they could get away with it. They can’t,
but casino magnate Sheldon Adelson believes he can use his fortune
to keep Internet gambling from becoming legal. The Washington
Post
notes today the blatant, open corporate cronyism of a man
trying to cast a sinister light on Internet gambling in order to

protect himself
from competition:

Billionaire casino magnate Shel­don Adelson, whose
record-breaking campaign spending in 2012 made him an icon of the
new super-donor era, is leveraging that newfound status in an
escalating feud with industry rivals over the future of
gambling.

Adelson, best known for building upscale casino resorts in
Nevada and more recently in Asia, wants to persuade Congress to ban
Internet betting. He says the practice is a danger to society and
could tarnish the industry’s traditional business model.

Nearly all of his competitors, including Caesars Entertainment
and MGM Resorts, disagree. They say regulated Internet gambling can
be done safely and can boost the industry.

Really, imagine people online giving you money and you not
needing to pay overhead for housekeepers and buffets and drink
specials and the whole Las Vegas/Atlantic City “experience.”

But that’s not where Adelson is at. He’s going to launch an
advocacy group, the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, and create
an advertising campaign to paint Internet gambling as evil, using
the same fears of online child predators that your local news
station does, to try to lure in nannyish supporters. For the
children, folks! We mustn’t allow Internet casinos to take money
out of Adelson’s pocket for the sake of the children!

Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey have legalized online gambling
to a certain degree, so Adelson may be trying to fight the tide.
Those rival casinos who support Internet gambling point out that
Adelson’s efforts would backfire, even if he succeeds, by
entrenching an Internet gambling black market:

“Sheldon’s approach would endanger everything he professes he
wanted to protect,” said Jan Jones Blackhurst, executive vice
president for government relations at Caesars Entertainment.
Adelson argues that a strictly enforced federal ban would
effectively shut down black-market gambling.  

Sadly, The Washington Post neglects to press Adelson to
give an example of a “strictly enforced federal ban” that had
successfully shut down any black market, ever, in American
history.

Read the whole story
here
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/casino-magnate-openly-wants-to-use-feds
via IFTTT

U.S. Attorney Flouts New DOJ Pot Policy

On August 30, the day after Deputy Attorney
General James Cole
announced
a new policy of prosecutorial restraint for marijuana
growers and sellers who comply with state law, Melinda Haag, the
U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California,
said
it would not affect her work. She has been true to her
word. The East Bay Express notes
that Haag continues to pursue forfeitures aimed at shutting down
the Berkeley Patients Group and Oakland’s Harborside Health
Center. Haag argues that the Berkeley dispensary is too close to a
preschool, a claim the city’s mayor disputes. She cites the sheer
size of Harborside, the state’s biggest dispensary, as cause for
concern. As the Express points out, neither of those
rationales seems to fit any of the eight “enforcement priorities”
that Cole listed in his
August 29 memo
as reasons for federal intervention.  
  

The memo did mention preventing underage consumption, but that
does not really seem relevant, unless Haag thinks 4-year-olds are
scoring marijuana at the Berkeley Patients Group. As for
Harborside’s size, Cole explicitly said, in a departure from prior
Justice Department policy, that  “prosecutors should not
consider the size or commercial nature of a marijuana operation
alone” in deciding whether targeting it is an appropriate use of
their resources. The Express notes that both
dispensaries have the backing of city and state officials:

Neither BPG nor Harborside has broken state law, which is why
Governor Jerry Brown has denounced the federal court actions and
why the cities of Oakland and Berkeley have moved to block the
forfeitures. Oakland sued Haag in October of 2012, and Berkeley
moved to intervene in the BPG case in July of this year.

At an October 29 conference, BPG’s attorney reports, the “judge
questioned why this case was proceeding in light of the Cole memo,”
and “the U.S. attorney had a very difficult time articulating an
answer.” By contrast, André Birotte, the U.S. attorney
for the Central District of California,

dropped
several forfeiture cases against dispensary
landlords in Irvine, Santa Ana, and Los Angeles in the wake of the
Cole memo.

The Cole memo leaves
lots of leeway
for prosecutorial discretion, depending on how
the enforcement priorities are interpreted and whether new ones are
invented on the fly (a possibility the memo itself contemplates).
But if Haag’s continued crackdown is consistent with the new
policy, it clearly does not mean much in practice. Likewise if U.S.
attorneys feel free to flout it.

[Thanks to Richard Cowan for the link.]

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/us-attorney-flouts-new-doj-pot-policy
via IFTTT

Supreme Court Turns Back NSA Challenge, Washington Starts Accepting Pot Business Licenses, Feds Seem Accepting of Bitcoin’s Existence: P.M. Links

  • Not Stopping Anytime (Soon)The Supreme Court
    turned away
    a case from the Electronic Privacy Information
    Center to stop the National Security Agency’s mass collection of
    telephone call metadata. There are still other challenges heading
    through the federal courts.
  • A judge has ruled that prosecutors can use evidence from

    James Holmes’ apartment
    in his trial for the Aurora, Colo.,
    theater shootings, even though police didn’t have a warrant at the
    time of the search.
  • Washington State has started accepting license applications for
    those who want to
    legally sell marijuana
    in the state.
  • The Department of Justice and the Security Exchange Commission
    seem to be accepting that Bitcoins are
    “legitimate financial instruments”
    of currency in a hearing
    before a Senate subcommittee today.

  • George Zimmerman has been arrested again
    , this time on a
    domestic disturbance call in Central Florida.
  • The
    high tax rates in France
    are leading to social unrest that
    could blow up even worse than it already is, according to a secret
    report from country’s ministry of the interior.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7
content 
widgets for your
websites.

Follow us on Facebook
and Twitter,
and don’t forget to
sign
up
 for Reason’s daily updates for more
content.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/supreme-court-turns-back-nsa-challenge-w
via IFTTT

Ira Stoll on Obama’s Kennedy-Style Free Trade Push

Back when President Obama was a senator, there
were high hopes for a return, of sorts, to the era that ended 50
years ago this week with the assassination of President Kennedy.
Obama, recall, came into office with members of the Kennedy family
and JFK’s White House counselor, Ted Sorenson, expressing hope that
he would follow in JFK’s footsteps. Ira Stoll says that if Obama
wants to be more like Kennedy, his best hope at this point is
probably a final push on free trade.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/18/ira-stoll-on-obamas-kennedy-style-free-t
via IFTTT