1,582-Page Spending Bill Hinges On NSA Giving Congress 5 Years Of Records

The 1,582-page (apparently bipartisan) omnibus spending bill announced last night adds up to a cool $1.1 trillion. As Bloomberg reports, lawmakers notes “not everyone will like everything in this bill,” and we can see why. There is no IMF funding, nothing that “blocks Obamacare,” the IRS gets a reprimand – barring them from targetng groups based on their ideological beliefs, preserves language that blocks Federal funding for abortions and spending any money to legalize marijuana. But, perhaps the most critical aspect of the bill is the NSA is required to give Congress number of phone records collected, reviewed during last 5 yrs, including estimate for records of U.S. citizens (among other things). Will that be one step too far for the administration?

 

Via Bloomberg:

Amendment to omnibus spending bill requires NSA to give Congress number of phone records collected, reviewed during last 5 yrs, including estimate for records of U.S. citizens.

NSA would have to provide unclassified report describing all spy programs that collect bulk data, including cost of programs, types of records being collected, kinds of data NSA plans to collect in future

NSA would have to file second unclassified report listing terrorist activities disrupted with aid of bulk phone records, detailing whether necessary information could have been obtained by other means

While this may be too much for the adminstration to bear, the Treasury is not happy that they can’t provide the standard reacharound to the IMF…

The Treasury Department has been seeking for months to boost the U.S.’s share, or quota, at the Washington-based IMF by shifting about $63 billion from an existing credit line. The U.S. is holding up the 2010 agreement by all of the IMF member countries, then totaling 187, to double the fund’s lending capacity to about $733 billion.

 

Holly Shulman, a Treasury spokeswoman, said in a statement that the department was disappointed that Congress had failed to include the quota funding, adding that “the IMF is critically important to U.S. economic and national security interests.”


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/W-dKGDXIvoA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Egyptians Vote in Referendum on a New Constitution

Egyptians are voting today and tomorrow on a new
constitution which bans political parties based on “religion, race,
gender or geography” such as the Muslim Brotherhood and strengthens
the military and the police. The constitution also guarantees
equality between the sexes and establishes Islam as the state
religion.

Read the draft constitution
here

Unsurprisingly, the Muslim Brotherhood, which backs ousted
President Morsi, is calling for a boycott of the vote.

According to the BBC,
five people have been killed in clashes and there was an explosion
in Cairo, although no one was reported injured or killed in that
incident. 

As
Reuters
explains, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is widely
expected to announce his candidacy for president in an upcoming
election, which could take place in April:

The referendum is a milestone in the political transition plan
the army-backed government has billed as a path back to democracy
even as it presses a fierce crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood,
Egypt’s best organized party until last year.

A presidential election could follow as early as April.

Echoing a view widely held in Egypt, a senior European diplomat
said Sisi would probably announce his candidacy in the next few
days – a prospect that will delight supporters but could stir more
conflict with his Islamist opponents.

Read Reason’s Ed Krayewski’s article “Egypt Should
Adopt the U.S. Constitution As Its Model”
here
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/14/egyptians-vote-in-referendum-on-a-new-co
via IFTTT

4-Week Bill Prices At 0.000%, Bid To Cover Soars To Highest Since 2011

Stocks may be masquerading as a big bounce today, driven by a VIX slam which has gotten the algos to ramp the S&P higher and of course a perfectly innocuous gold slam which as usual took out the entire bid stack, but the real money is furiously going elsewhere, such as today’s 4 Week auction. Two things were notable: first – the rate was a solid 0.000%. This is not that surprising: after all under ZIRP, and as long as the Fed has control and the USD is the reserve currency, ultra-short term maturities are cash equivalent, which is why investors don’t mind getting zero return in exchange for 1 month maturities.

However, what was far more notable is that the Bid to Cover in today’s auction just soared to 6.36x, highest than last week’s 5.66x, and the highest since December of 2011, when the scramble into short-term paper was a function of year end window dressing (made since unncessary courtesy of the Fed’s Reverse Repo facility).

So while algos are levitating stocks higher based on simple carry currency/VIX correlations, why the sudden real money scramble for the safety of near-term paper?

 

Finally, what is also notable is that all ultra-short durations are now trading at negative yields


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Y6hL_oTUIdg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Meanwhile In Socialist France…

It would appear that in order to appease the masses – despite his recent small bump in popularity post-Affair – France’s President Hollande has gone full Socialist-tard. Aside from promises to cut spending by EUR50 billion in the next 3 years (so less taxes?), Hollande has suggested…

  • FRANCE’S HOLLANDE SAYS FRANCE MUST PRODUCE “MORE AND BETTER”
  • HOLLANDE SAYS COMPANIES WILL IN RETURN BE GIVEN QUANTITATIVE TARGETS FOR HIRING, TRAINING
  • HOLLANDE SAYS PUBLIC SPENDING CUTS CAN BE MADE WHILE PRESERVING FRENCH SOCIAL MODEL

Channeling Stalin, he further calls for “more economic governance of the Euro-zone” and the creation of a Franco-German energy company and more tax-harmonization with the Germans. We are sure Merkel will be over-the-moon at that suggestion.

So hitch up to Germany.. (and if they won’t then that’s a victory for nationalism also)

  • *HOLLANDE CALLS FOR MORE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL COHESION WITH GERMANY
  • *HOLLANDE SAYS GOVT TO CREATE 50,000 JOBS FOR YOUTH IN 2014

It’s just that easy…

So appease the peons with spending cuts..

  • *HOLLANDE REITERATES THAT SPENDING MUST BE CUT TO REDUCE TAXES

then slam with Stalin-esque central-planning and control…

  • *HOLLANDE CALLS FOR MORE ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE OF EURO ZONE

But in the interests of keeping his base happy… he clarified…

  • *HOLLANDE SAYS HE HASN’T TURNED INTO A FREE MARKETEER


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/1ZUS0FZkGU0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Vid: Legalize Prostitution to Fight Sex Trafficking? These Sex Workers Say "Yes"

When California passed the anti-sex
trafficking measure Proposition 35
 in 2012, an
overwhelming 81 percent of voters chose “yes on 35.

After all, who could be against a law that sought to crack down
on traffickers of juvenile sex slaves?

As it turns out, some of the most outspoken opponents of the law
were sex workers themselves. They balked at the provision requiring
sex traffickers to register as sex offenders, fearing that the
overly broad definition of trafficker could ensnare them,
their customers, and their family members. The anti-pimping
provisions, they argued, blurred the legal lines between coercive
underage trafficking and consensual, adult prostitution.

“They’re calling themselves the anti-trafficking lobby, but
they’re really a group of people primarily against commercial sex
work,” says Mariko
Passion
, a San Francisco-based sex worker, artist, and
self-described “whore revolutionary.”

Other sex workers echo Passion’s anti-Prop. 35 sentiments. One
Los Angeles-based prostitute, who asked to be known only as “Holly”
for fear of legal reprisal, says that she freely chose her line of
work following the 2008 housing crash. She had grown tired of the
corporate rat race and wanted to go “off the grid.” Holly, who runs
her own online escort service, says the draconian provisions of
Prop. 35 have made her less likely to report an assault and that
she resents those who think of her as a victim in need of
salvation.

“The difference between human trafficking and prostitution is
coercion,” says Holly. “I’m not a victim. I’m not being coerced.
But the law doesn’t see me that way.”

What might an alternative system of legalized sex work look
like? Reason TV traveled to the Moonlite Bunny Ranch, a legal
brothel in rural Nevada, to try to answer that question (note: link
to Bunny Ranch may not be safe for work). Proprieter Dennis Hof
says that legalization is the fastest, most efficient way to battle
underage sex trafficking and other ills associated with
prostitution. He points to the
remarkably high rate of HIV infection among prosititutes in nearby
Las Vegas
where, contrary to popular belief, sex work remains
illegal and underground. By contrast, he says, there has never been
a documented outbreak among Bunny Ranch workers.

“When you legalize something, it takes all the nonsense out of
the business,” says Hof. “It takes the criminals out of the
business. It puts money into the coffers of society, instead of
taking it out to police this ill [of sex trafficking].”

Can legalized prostitution do more good than celebrity-backed
anti-trafficking organizations could ever hope for? Watch the video
above for the full story, and click the link below for downloadable
versions.

Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Associate Producer Will Neff.
Shot by Sharif Matar, Alex Manning, and Neff. Approximately 8
minutes.

Subscribe to Reason TV’s
YouTube channel
to receive automatic notification when new
material goes live.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/14/vid-legalize-prostitution-to-fight-sex-t
via IFTTT

Vid: Legalize Prostitution to Fight Sex Trafficking? These Sex Workers Say “Yes”

When California passed the anti-sex
trafficking measure Proposition 35
 in 2012, an
overwhelming 81 percent of voters chose “yes on 35.

After all, who could be against a law that sought to crack down
on traffickers of juvenile sex slaves?

As it turns out, some of the most outspoken opponents of the law
were sex workers themselves. They balked at the provision requiring
sex traffickers to register as sex offenders, fearing that the
overly broad definition of trafficker could ensnare them,
their customers, and their family members. The anti-pimping
provisions, they argued, blurred the legal lines between coercive
underage trafficking and consensual, adult prostitution.

“They’re calling themselves the anti-trafficking lobby, but
they’re really a group of people primarily against commercial sex
work,” says Mariko
Passion
, a San Francisco-based sex worker, artist, and
self-described “whore revolutionary.”

Other sex workers echo Passion’s anti-Prop. 35 sentiments. One
Los Angeles-based prostitute, who asked to be known only as “Holly”
for fear of legal reprisal, says that she freely chose her line of
work following the 2008 housing crash. She had grown tired of the
corporate rat race and wanted to go “off the grid.” Holly, who runs
her own online escort service, says the draconian provisions of
Prop. 35 have made her less likely to report an assault and that
she resents those who think of her as a victim in need of
salvation.

“The difference between human trafficking and prostitution is
coercion,” says Holly. “I’m not a victim. I’m not being coerced.
But the law doesn’t see me that way.”

What might an alternative system of legalized sex work look
like? Reason TV traveled to the Moonlite Bunny Ranch, a legal
brothel in rural Nevada, to try to answer that question (note: link
to Bunny Ranch may not be safe for work). Proprieter Dennis Hof
says that legalization is the fastest, most efficient way to battle
underage sex trafficking and other ills associated with
prostitution. He points to the
remarkably high rate of HIV infection among prosititutes in nearby
Las Vegas
where, contrary to popular belief, sex work remains
illegal and underground. By contrast, he says, there has never been
a documented outbreak among Bunny Ranch workers.

“When you legalize something, it takes all the nonsense out of
the business,” says Hof. “It takes the criminals out of the
business. It puts money into the coffers of society, instead of
taking it out to police this ill [of sex trafficking].”

Can legalized prostitution do more good than celebrity-backed
anti-trafficking organizations could ever hope for? Watch the video
above for the full story, and click the link below for downloadable
versions.

Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Associate Producer Will Neff.
Shot by Sharif Matar, Alex Manning, and Neff. Approximately 8
minutes.

Subscribe to Reason TV’s
YouTube channel
to receive automatic notification when new
material goes live.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/14/vid-legalize-prostitution-to-fight-sex-t
via IFTTT

Amagi Metals: The Place to Buy Precious Metals with Bitcoin

Even those in the precious metals community who do not support Bitcoin, cannot deny two very significant facts. First, there is an undeniable overlap between many of those in the precious metals community and those within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Second, many of the early adopters of BTC have amassed sizable fortunes. So we have a captive audience of potential precious metals buyers who have exponentially more wealth than they had two years ago. You might think it’d be a good idea to offer gold and silver for sale for Bitcoin. That’s where Amagi Metals comes in.

Over the past several months I have come to know Stephen Macaskill, the man behind Amagi Metals, which is based just 30 miles east of me in Denver, Colorado. Stephen saw the potential to accept Bitcoin before most people had even heard of it. Specifically, the company was started in 2008 and began accepting BTC in November 2012. The rewards reaped from this decision have been enormous, with a reported $900,000 in Bitcoin for precious metals sales over Thanksgiving weekend alone! As such, the Bitcoin part of the business supports at least one full time employee at this point.

Those in the precious metals community should understand and appreciate the fact that many of the fortunes made in Bitcoin ultimately represent considerable buying power directed at those wise enough to take advantage. A merchant takes no BTC volatility risk either, as long as they use a payment processor like Coinbase (check out this interview with the founder) or BitPay.

As such, for those looking to spend some bitcoin on bars and coins, I strongly suggest checking out Amagi Metals.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1LefuVV2eCnW9VKjJGJzgZWa9vHg7Rc3r1

 Follow me on Twitter.

Amagi Metals: The Place to Buy Precious Metals with Bitcoin originally appeared on A Lightning War for Liberty on January 14, 2014.

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://ift.tt/1gFtydp
via IFTTT

American Government Backed Murderous Mexican Drug Cartel for More Than a Decade

Time reports:

The U.S. government allowed the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel to carry out its business unimpeded between 2000 and 2012 in exchange for information on rival cartels, an investigation by El Universal claims.

 

***

 

Dr. Edgardo Buscaglia, a senior research scholar in law and economics at Columbia University, says that the tactic has been previously used in Colombia, Cambodia, Thailand and Afghanistan.

 

“Of course, this modus operandi involves a violation of public international law, besides adding more fuel to the violence, violations of due process and of human rights,” he told El Universal.

 

Myles Frechette, a former U.S. ambassador to Colombia, said while that the problem of drug trafficking in Colombia persists, the tactic of secret agreements had managed to reduce it.The period when the relationship between the DEA and Sinaloa was supposed to have been the closest, between 2006 and 2012, saw a major surge of violence in Mexico, and was the time when the Sinaloa cartel rose significantly in prominence.

Business Insider writes:

There have long been allegations that Guzman, considered to be “the world’s most powerful drug trafficker,” coordinates with American authorities.

 

But the El Universal investigation is the first to publish court documents that include corroborating testimony from a DEA agent and a Justice Department official.

Fox News reports:

According to the motion, the deal was part of a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, where the U.S. helped finance and arm the Sinaloa cartel, through Operation Fast and Furious, in exchange for information that allowed the D.E.A. and FBI to destroy and dismantle rival Mexican cartels.

 

***

 

“Under that agreement, the Sinaloa Cartel, through Loya, was to provide information accumulated by Mayo, Chapo, and others, against rival Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations to the United States government. In return, the United States government agreed to dismiss the prosecution of the pending case against Loya, not to interfere with his drug trafficking activities and those of the Sinaloa Cartel, to not actively prosecute him, Chapo, Mayo, and the leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, and to not apprehend them.”

 

***

 

The motion claims Mayo, Chapo and Zambada- Niebla routinely passed information through Loya to the D.E.A. that allowed it to make drug busts. In return, the U.S. helped the leaders evade Mexican police.

 

It says: “In addition, the defense has evidence that from time to time, the leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel was informed by agents of the DEA through Loya that United States government agents and/or Mexican authorities were conducting investigations near the home territories of cartel leaders so that the cartel leaders could take appropriate actions to evade investigators– even though the United States government had indictments, extradition requests, and rewards for the apprehension of Mayo, Chapo, and other alleged leaders, as well as Mr. Zambada-Niebla.”

Salon notes:

Under the remit of the War on Drugs, millions of U.S. citizens have faced arrest and jail time for minor, nonviolent charges. All the while, it has been revealed, the U.S. government has been enabling billions of dollars worth of drugs to flood into the country from Mexico because of shady deals with the notorious Sinaloa cartel.

 

***

 

Sinaloa (believed to supply 80 percent of Chicago’s street drugs) has been working with U.S. authorities since 2000 to provide information in return for immunity and undisturbed drug trafficking. Court documents obtained by El Universal show testimony from DEA and DOJ officials affirming the relationship.

The U.S. government has – at least at some times in some parts of the world – long protected drug operations. (Big American banks also launder money for drug cartels. See this, this, this and this.  Indeed, drug dealers kept the banking system afloat during the depths of the 2008 financial crisis.)

And opium production is at an all-time high under the American occupation of Afghanistan.

Is American backing of the Sinaloa drug cartel another instance of U.S. government involvement in the drug trade?  Or a misconceived attempt to back one devil (the Sinaloa cartel has been responsible for massive violence in Mexico) against another?

This is analogous to America’s backing of the most dangerous and violent Muslim terrorists for decades … in order to contain rival Muslim factions.

Absolutely idiotic …


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/b1y_gb3Eo5w/story01.htm George Washington

Gold Monkey-Hammered As Stocks Spike

Well that escalated quickly… As Europe closes, the precious metals complex is slaughtered on the altar of higher stocks and lower bond prices…

 

We can only imagin the fiduciary that would wait til the last mnute to bulk sell as much nominal paper gold and silver as this…

 

And for a sense of the volume…

 

Perhap best summed up thus:


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/r9odw_ktwx4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Gene Healy on Newtown: The Moral Panic That Wasn't

One year ago, in the wake of the horrific school
shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., the
Obama White House released its agenda for
“protect[ing] our children and communities by reducing gun
violence.” It was a report marked by a tone of grim urgency from
its title onward: “Now Is the Time” to tighten background checks
for guns, ban “military-style assault weapons,” and fortify our
schools. But a year later, notes Gene Healy, Newtown’s legislative
legacy is far less dramatic than it might have been. 

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/14/gene-healy-on-newtown-the-moral-panic-th
via IFTTT