Used Car Prices Hit All Time High

Submitted by Nicholas Colas of DataTrek Research

Regular readers know that we consider used car prices an important, if overlooked, indicator of the true state of the US economy. More Americans buy used vehicles than new ones, making them a deeper measure of consumer sentiment. And since the supply of used cars and trucks is essentially fixed – you can’t “make” one – prices are exceptionally twitchy and move noticeably on both dealer (and therefore small business) sentiment and underlying retail demand.

The Manheim Used Vehicle Index is one widely watched measure, and it just made a new all time high for data from July 2018 auction results.

The numbers and some historical perspective:

  • Wholesale (the index tracks dealer-only auction results) prices for used cars/trucks were +1.5% from June to July 2018 and +5.1% versus July 2017.
  • More affordable vehicles saw the largest price increases, with compact and midsized cars outperforming the overall market. This is unusual; for the last several years it has been hotter-selling SUVs and pickup trucks that have led used vehicle prices higher.
  • Cox Automotive (which owns the Manheim auction business) notes that the overall used vehicle market (both dealer and private sales) is currently robust, with a July 2018 selling rate of 39.2 million vehicles, +3% over last year and at +5 year highs. For comparison, July 2018 new vehicle sales were flat versus last year.

As for what is causing recent strength in used vehicle demand and therefore prices, Manheim notes three factors:

  • Continued strength in the US economy.
  • Growing affordability issues in the new car market. A quick Internet search on our part shows that a new Honda Civic is $19,000, but a 3-year-old used version will run you about $11,000. With US wage growth still slow, the latter is obviously a more compelling option for many consumers, even if it rises another 10% in price over the next 12-18 months.
  • Worries about import tariffs, which pushes dealers to stock up on used vehicles in anticipation of rising new vehicle prices.

While it would be tempting to pin the surge in used vehicle prices on tariff worries, a look at the data since 2010 shows a different story entirely. Used car prices were remarkably stable from the start of the decade through 2016. The breakout to new historical highs was in mid-2017 (i.e. long before recent tariff announcements) and current year prices look similar to those levels. So yes, tariff fear-related buying clearly plays a role but the overall picture has been good for longer than that factor can explain.

The upshot here: strength in used car prices is more a function of good consumer demand than temporary factors like tariffs concerns. On the plus side, that’s a promising sign about the state of the US economy. On the downside, it says much about the lack of affordability of new cars and trucks; automakers face a real challenge there. On balance, we take it as positive news with only a small asterisk beside it.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2LcYyWB Tyler Durden

Are You in the Tax Hall of Shame?: New at Reason

Revenue departments around the country routinely publish lists of taxpayers whose bills are past due. The explicit purpose of these lists is to invite friends, family, and acquaintances to shame tax delinquents into paying. Unsubtle program names such as Colorado’s “Hall of Shame” (since renamed) and Louisiana’s “CyberShame” (since discontinued) gave away the game.

To ensure that law-abiding taxpayers have all the tools necessary to shame tax evaders effectively, states release some highly personal information. Of the 14 states that maintain an up-to-date delinquent taxpayer list that’s easily accessible online, 11 include the offending non-taxpayer’s full address. Of the three states that maintain a list but don’t include addresses, two still reveal the delinquent’s county.

Traditionally, detailed public disclosures of information are the realm of ex-convicts who are potentially a danger to those around them, write Andrew Wilford and Dan King in their latest piece at Reason.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2w0tCEk
via IFTTT

China, US “Not Optimistic” Trade Negotiations Will Succeed: FT

Commenting on the upcoming, fourth round of trade talks between the US and China, which are scheduled to take place in Washington tomorrow ahead of the Aug.23 implementation of new China tariffs by the US, the FT reports that “neither side is optimistic that the meeting in Washington, between teams led by Wang Shouwen and David Malpass, can succeed where three earlier rounds failed.

There has been a resurgence in market optimism that the ongoing trade war between the two nations may be resolved after the WSJ reported last week that a November summit between Trump and Xi seeks to find a common ground on trade, sending global risk sharply higher in the past 3 days.

And yet, it was only in May that China’s Vice-Premier, Liu He, and Steven Mnuchin, US Treasury Secretary, said publicly after meeting in May that neither side would resort to tariffs while negotiations continued. But just days later Donald Trump announced his intention to proceed with punitive tariffs on Chinese industrial exports worth $50bn annually.

Meanwhile, in private conversations, the FT reports that Beijing officials said that “what they see as Mr Trump’s constant provocations — such as his recent threat to target additional Chinese exports worth $200bn with tariffs of up to 25 per cent— have made it extremely difficult for them to offer conciliatory gestures.

China is also exasperated by the Trump administration’s “good-cop, bad-cop” approach to the negotiations personified by Mr Mnuchin and Robert Lighthizer, US Trade Representative; China’s exasperation stems from the fact that while Mnuchin and other Treasury officials have indicated a willingness to negotiate a speedy end to the dispute, Trump has repeatedly sided with the China hawks at the Office of the US Trade Representative.

“We are not optimistic because we don’t think Trump is willing to compromise,” one Chinese official told the Financial Times, noting that this week’s talks may – at best – lead to other, higher-level negotiations before Mr Trump decides to up the ante again.

The FT also notes that if Trump follows through on his threat to target an additional $200bn worth of Chinese exports, “it will harden views in Beijing that a full-scale trade war between the world’s two largest economies is inevitable.”

That said, it is not very likely that Trump will concede, especially not since “Trump is weaponizing the US economy,” as Richard Yetsenga, research head at ANZ Bank in Sydney claims. “Because the US economy is so strong, he is banking on other countries to fold.”

As for tomorrow’s meeting, talks will center on a list of more than 140 specific demands originally drafted by the Trump administration for the first round of trade talks in May.

These included items such as the rapid approval of applications by Mastercard and Visa to enter China’s domestic payments market — and JPMorgan’s plans to take a majority stake in its Chinese securities joint venture.

In response, the FT writes that Chinese officials have indicated that in less confrontational circumstances, they would be willing to either implement or discuss about two-thirds of the demands. They added that the rest, such as opening China’s cloud computing market to foreign companies, is off-limits because of national security and other concerns.

The bigger issue, however is that Beijing is “reluctant to offer even modest concessions to Washington that would advance the Chinese president’s own reform agenda.” That has angered US officials who were as shocked by the recent refusal by Chinese competition regulators to approve Qualcomm’s $44bn takeover of NXP as Chinese officials were by Mr Trump’s decision to proceed with tariffs. 

So is there any hope that tomorrows 4th meeting between the two trade delegations will finally reach a breakthrough: yes, but as both sides admit, it all rests on what Trump will say or do, which in turn may be determined by how confident the president is as he enters the final midterm elections stretch: if the GOP is seen as losing momentum, Trump may have no choice but to yield especially as US farmers and producers growing increasingly frustrated with Trump’s tariffs. Alternatively, if Trump is confident he has the upper hand, the 4th trade meeting between China and the US will end exactly like the prior three…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2L8Ifdv Tyler Durden

Bernie’s Digital Media Empire: New at Reason

Bernie Sanders is all over the internet. His videos are everywhere and, unfortunately, millions watch.

How have his socialist ideas reached so many people? John Stossel explores.

Click here for full text and downloadable versions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Like us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.

View this article.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2nWau61
via IFTTT

US Small Caps Hit Record High As US Macro Data Dumps To 11-Month Lows

Another day, another short squeeze and the Russell 2000 index of US small cap companies has just hit a new record high…

The narrative of small cap outperformance has been “domestic” safety vs overseas trade war scares (as a reminder, here’s why that is a false thesis)… which is odd given that “domestic” data has collapsed in recent months…

Probably nothing…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2N4rge0 Tyler Durden

Russia Abandons Bond Sale “Due To Market Volatility”

Whether it is explicitly US sanctions or the implicit uncertainty injected into global markets by a dollar-squeezing Fed, the latest impact of global tightening has hit Russia head on as it has been forced to abandon its planned weekly bond auction tomorrow.

According to the Russian Finance Ministry’s website, it has decided not to hold primary debt auctions, scheduled for Aug. 22, due to sharp increase in market volatility.

The halt is the first since April.

Who can blame them with 10Y Russia OFZ (ruble-denominated) bond yields now above 8.5% (back above pre-Trump levels)…

Local Russian yields are now higher than Mexico’s and just lower than South Africa’s…

With stress leaking to its banking system…

And the Ruble sliding back to its weakest since April 2016…

The Russian Finance Ministry also confirmed it will resume auctions on regular basis once the debt market situation stabilizes.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Le7ACK Tyler Durden

Elon Musk Deletes His Instagram Account, Leaving 8.2 Million Followers Guessing

In the latest perplexing decision by Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO appears to have deleted his Instagram account, leaving some 8.2 million followers guessing what prompted the abrupt move. Business Insider first reported the story, suggesting that the ongoing bizarre online “hate triangle” spat between Musk, his (ex) girlfriend Grimes, and rapper Azealia Bank is responsible.

As we reported over the weekend, on August 12, Banks said on Instagram that she had been at Musk’s house and seen singer Grimes “coddling” Musk after the “going private” twitter fiasco. She then told Business Insider that she saw him in the kitchen “scrounging for investors” after tweeting that Tesla had “funding secured.” A few days later, Musk confirmed to the NYT that he had seen Banks after initially denying that he had every met her before. Banks also alleged that Musk was “on acid” when he sent out his now infamous “funding secured” tweet.

It did not end there, and on Monday, Banks tagged Musk in her Instagram story, writing “you need to contact me. ASAP.” followed by “I need my phone back now.”

According to Cheddar reporter Hope King, snapshotting a now deleted Instagram story, Banks claimed that Musk’s attorney paid off Banks’ attorney to take her phone and delete evidence from it.

In a separate story, Elon Musk and his girlfriend Grimes also recently unfollowed each other on Instagram, and Musk unfollowed Grimes on Twitter, prompting rumours that their relationship may be over.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2BvS2L2 Tyler Durden

Backpage.com Founders Michael Lacey and James Larkin Were Accused of Sex Trafficking by the Senate. Now They Tell Their Story: Reason Roundup

I spent July 3 and 4 in and around Phoenix with two of the most vilified men in America, Backpage founders James Larkin and Michael Lacey, who had been accused by senators of facilitating sex-trafficking and targeted by activists and attorneys general across America. I also spoke with a cadre of their family members, former employees, and oldest friends, including Phoenix business coach Francine Hardaway.

“They are the nicest guys. They are freedom fighters. They are not sex traffickers,” says Hardaway, one of the earliest writers for what would become Michael Lacey and James Larkin’s indie-press empire. “I mean, [that they are sex traffickers] is the most absurd thing I ever heard.”

But as the founders of Backpage.com, Larkin and Lacey have been cast as complicit in an array of alleged evils. And they’re certain its political.

“Part of the reason this has really worked is because you have Cindy and John McCain involved and they see an opportunity to even a score,” says Larkin.

The McCains were far from the only enemies he and Lacey made in more than four decades running free newspapers including the Phoenix New Times and the Village Voice. In recent years, everyone from Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris to actor Ashton Kutcher and Joe Arpaio, the crooked Maricopa County sheriff pardoned last year by President Trump, have made them targets.

“We spent 40 years doing journalism, groundbreaking journalism, and they want to take all that away,” says Lacey when we talk at his home just outside Phoenix on the 4th of July. Three months earlier, in April, armed and masked agents had raided the place on the day before Lacey was celebrating his new nuptials. They did the same at the nearby home Larkin shares with his wife.

Now, both men are tethered to Maricopa County by court order and ankle monitor as they await a trial that the feds say they need until 2020 to prepare for. In the interim, prosecutors have been busy seizing Lacey and Larkin’s assets and pushing to disqualify their attorneys.

“I watched it happen to them all their lives that sooner or later, after they’ve proven themselves nine million times, somebody finds some way to stick it to them,” Hardaway tells me. “Mike and Jim, their entire reason for going into business was to be free speech advocates. … And so they’re easy targets for being free speech advocates at a time when free speech is a huge question.”

Most people think the story of their arrest is a story about sex trafficking. But not even the current federal indictment against Lacey, Larkin, and several other former Backpage bigwigs alleges that, nor did CEO Carl Ferrer cop to it in the April plea deal he accepted.

The story of how Lacey and Larkin ended up here is better understood as one of political retribution meeting moral panic, greed, and good old-fashioned authoritarianism. It’s one in which an array of very invested parties colluded to take down a company with financial assets and attitude in equal proportion, despite the fact that it was actively working with law enforcement and against sexual exploitation and underage prostitution.

“We didn’t really care what politicians saw in us,” says Larkin. “And that’s come back to haunt us.”

Read more here.

FREE MINDS

New European Union rules “will turn popular social media sites into EU-owned ATMs,” warns Techdirt.

FREE MARKETS

Zoning reform goes bipartisan—and federal? It’s great that people of varying political stripes are recognizing how local land-use restrictions can actually impede affordable housing. But do we really want Congress to take the reins on spurring local reforms? Some market urbanism advocates are suggesting so. At CityLab, urban planning researcher and Market Urbanism contributor Nolan Gray writes that “conditioning valuable federal dollars on an end to exclusionary zoning is an idea whose time has come.” Read his case why here.

QUICK HITS

  • Prisoners are going on a labor strike in 17 states.
  • Protesters at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill last night toppled a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam.”
  • “Nastya Rybka,” the Belarusian “seduction coach” who claims to have proof of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, pleaded not guilty to prostitution charges in Thailand, where she’s been detained since February. Rybka recently told the Associated Press that she had given her audio and video to Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch and former Paul Manafort business associate with whom she had a brief relationship. “He promised me a little something already,” she said. “If he do that then there will be no problem, but if he don’t…”
  • “Gen Z will comprise 32 percent of the global population of 7.7 billion in 2019, nudging ahead of millennials, who will account for a 31.5 percent share,” according to a new analysis.
  • Environmental activists take up the states’ rights mantle.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2OUSqVg
via IFTTT

PDVSA Settles With ConocoPhillips In Desperate Bid To Stop Decline

Authored by Nick Cunningham via Oilprice.com,

PDVSA settled with ConocoPhillips on Monday over an outstanding debt issue, a move that the Venezuelan oil company surely hopes will give it some breathing room even as the nation continues to crumble.

Earlier this year, Conoco won an international arbitration award resulting from the 2007 assets seizure by Venezuela. Conoco quickly moved to lay claim to PDVSA’s refining assets in the Dutch Caribbean, a devastating blow to Venezuela that compounded fiscal and operational problems. Without the processing facilities on the islands of Curacao and Aruba, PDVSA’s oil exports plunged deeper in the second quarter.

Venezuela’s revolutionary government has made it a point of pride to resist outside pressure, which makes the latest settlement all the more remarkable. PDVSA has agreed to pay ConocoPhillips an initial $500 million within 90 days, which will then be followed by quarterly payments over the next four and a half years.

The fact that PDVSA agreed to the settlement is a testament to how much of a crisis the company (and ultimately the Venezuelan government) finds itself in, and how important those Caribbean assets are to ongoing operations. Venezuela’s oil production continues to decline. In July, output fell to just 1.278 million barrels per day (mb/d), down 500,000 bpd from the fourth quarter of last year and down nearly 1 mb/d from two years ago. A growing number of analysts see output dipping below the 1-million-barrel-per-day mark by the end of 2018.

The deal comes as the U.S.-based subsidiary of PDVSA, Citgo, is also in the spotlight. A recent court ruling in a separate case exposed Citgo to asset seizure. Canadian miner Crystallex won a case just this month against PDVSA, arguing that Citgo, as a subsidiary of PDVSA, was essentially the same company as PDVSA, which means that Citgo was eligible for asset seizure. A U.S. federal judge agreed, putting Citgo in jeopardy. Citgo is appealing the decision.

PDVSA’s settlement with Conoco could get the American oil company off its back, so long as payments are forthcoming. That could potentially relieve some operational pressure. Presumably, PDVSA could regain control of the facilities on the Caribbean, which should allow for oil exports to resume at higher levels.

But the settlement does not mean that PDVSA is out of the woods, by any means.

First, the payments will be painful and hard to meet. The $2 billion that PDVSA owes ConocoPhillips amounts to about a quarter of the cash reserves that Venezuela’s central bank still has left. If the Venezuelan oil company fails to meet the terms of the settlement, Conoco “can resume global enforcement actions,” Daren Beaudo, a Conoco spokesman, told Bloomberg in an email.

Second, it does little to assuage the long line of creditors who are not part of the deal. Indeed, they could begin to fight for the remaining crumbs as the country falls apart.

“Venezuela’s (President Nicolas) Maduro has short-term, patchwork approach to fixing problems. This means that whomever pressures or checkmates the government early enough, will get some cash as country spirals downward,” Raul Gallegos, associate director with consultancy Control Risks and author of Crude Nation, said in a tweet. In other words, the incentive for creditors could be to start grabbing as much as they can as they run the risk of getting nothing by hanging back.

Meanwhile, Venezuela is tearing apart at the seams. Over the weekend, President Nicolas Maduro introduced a raft of economic reforms that will almost certainly do little to solve the crisis, and could potentially increase hardship. He introduced a higher minimum wage, announced a plan to hike gasoline prices and devalued the currency by about 95 percent, one of the most painful devaluations in history. Inflation could top 1 million percent this year. Millions of people have fled the country.

The end result for the oil sector is the same as before: More losses. If PDVSA manages to regain control of its assets in the Caribbean, it could slow the decline. But it won’t be enough to pull the company or the country back from the brink.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2N8FgDw Tyler Durden

US Foreclosures Rise For First Time In 36 Months

One month ago we discussed why according to the recent data, the “Housing Market Headed For “Broadest Slowdown In Years.” Fast forward to today, when we received the latest confirmation that the US housing market appears to have recently hit a downward inflection point: according to the just released July 2018 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report released by ATTOM Data Solutions, foreclosure starts in July increased by 1% from a year ago — the first year-over-year increase following 36 consecutive months of decreases.

Foreclosures rose from a year ago in 96 of the 219 metropolitan statistical areas, or 44% of the markets analyzed in the report; 33 of those areas posted their third straight monthly increase. A total of 30,187 U.S. properties started the foreclosure process for the first time in July, up 1 percent from the previous month and while the increase was less than 1% from a year ago, it marked the first annual increase in exactly 3 years.

21 states posted a year-over-year increase in foreclosure starts in July, including Florida (up 35 percent); California (up 3 percent); Texas (up 7 percent); Illinois (up 7 percent); and Ohio (up 2 percent).

Metro areas posting year-over-year increases in foreclosure starts in July included Los Angeles, California (up 20 percent); Houston, Texas (up 76 percent); Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (up 10 percent); Miami, Florida (up 29 percent); and San Francisco, California (up 10 percent).

“The increase in foreclosure starts is not just a one-month anomaly in many local markets given that July represented the third consecutive month with a year-over-year increase in 33 metro areas, including Los Angeles, Miami, Houston, Detroit, San Diego and Austin,” said Daren Blomquist, senior vice president with ATTOM Data Solutions.

“Gradually loosening lending standards over the past few years have introduced a modicum of risk back into the housing market, and that additional risk is resulting in rising foreclosure starts in a diverse set of markets across the country. Most susceptible to rising foreclosure starts are affordability-challenged markets where homebuyers are more financially stretched and markets with some type of trigger event such as a natural disaster or large-scale layoffs.”

The data comes shortly after a separate report found that there has been a plunge of sales in ultra-luxury real estate in New York City, where apartments that cost $5 million or more have seen their sale plunge more than 31% in the first 6 months of the year.

The surprising reversal in the US housing sector comes at a time when the US economy is reportedly firing on all four cylinders, with the stock market at all time highs and not long after the Department of Commerce revised income and spending data to “discover” that US households had actually saved twice as much as previously expected. Which begs the question: is the rise in interest rates a sufficiently adverse development to offset all the other favorable trends in the economy, or is something more sinister – and unknown – taking place in the US economy.

As a reminder it is housing – and not financial markets or stocks – that has traditionally been the most relevant, and aspirational, asset for the US middle class and as such is the best indicator of economic prosperity (or lack thereof) for a majority of the US population. And recent trends are anything but optimistic.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2BEhONs Tyler Durden