Snap, Crackle, & Drop: “Hottest IPO” Crashes As Bull Market Celebrates 8th Birthday

Judging by today's VIX crush and USDJPY ramp, this was the sound coming from The Eccles Building…

 

8 years ago today, the S&P 500 bottomed at 666…S&P earnings are up 78% since then.. and the S&P is up 247%

 

The Dow bottomed on 03/09/09 at 6547 – 30Y yields were at 3.57%; The Dow is now at 21,000 and 30Y yields at 3.10%… (and the 2s30s yield curve has collapsed from 260bps to 175bps)

 

Something very different today: Bonds and stocks were sold together (same as happened on Thursday but much more pronounced)

 

And Risk Parity funds had their worst 2-day drop since mid-December…

 

On the day, Trannies and Small Caps were worst…

 

Despite desperate efforts to ramp USDJPY and crash VIX, stocks could not get green…

 

Notably, Small Caps slipped back into the 'old range'…

 

Financials (red) had their worst 3-day drop in 7 weeks… almost filling the gap from last week's meltup…

 

Snap crackled…then dropped and has erased all of its post-IPO gains…

 

And Camera-on-a-Stick crashed to new record lows (on the heels of a Goldman downgrade)

 

Bonds sold off into and through the US open but once Europe closed a bid reappeared…2Y ended unch

 

The Dollar rose on the day led by notably cable weakness…

 

Crude clung to unchanged (despite USD strength), Copper plunged on China lower growth, PMs drifted lower…

 

Finally – a quick question – who does The Fed work for? Main Street or Wall Street?

Real earnings are up 2.5% off the 2009 lows, The Dow is up 210%

 

via http://ift.tt/2mOAj9D Tyler Durden

Preet Bharara’s Counterproductive Crusade to Clean Up New York Politics: New at Reason

The mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio, is a tax-and-spend bleeding-heart liberal who ordinarily would be way, way down on the list of people that this center-right columnist would want to spend any time or energy defending. So give the Obama-Trump-Schumer U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, some credit, Ira Stoll writes. With his open-ended, leaky, and so far inconclusive yearlong investigation into “corruption” by the mayor and his administration, he’s achieved the nearly impossible task of turning de Blasio into a sympathetic figure.

Our story begins back in April of 2016, when The New York Times reported that in the preceding month the mayor “learned of a federal corruption investigation into top Police Department officials. The inquiry revolved around two of Mr. de Blasio’s big-money political supporters and appeared to extend into his fund-raising efforts more broadly.” A December 2016 Times article headlined “Grand Juries Said to Hear Testimonies on Inquiries Into de Blasio Fund-Raising” reported that the inquiries “could wrap up in a matter of weeks.”

Alas, no such luck, writes Stoll. Meanwhile, the mayor and his top aides have racked up millions of dollars in legal fees on outside lawyers to defend against the investigation, and the vague cloud of suspicion cast anonymously over the mayor and some of his aides that have been named in the press coverage risks violating their Sixth Amendment rights.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2n7RRcP
via IFTTT

Valuation (Alone) Doesn’t Matter

Via ConvergEx's Nicholas Colas,

Valuation won’t ever tell you if a stock is heading higher or lower.  Valuation is math, and math is not an investment edge; it is only helpful because it tells you what the market believes.  Figure out why that’s wrong (and it generally is), and now you have something useful.  Take the companies of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  On average, they trade for 18.6x 2017 consensus earnings, and 16.6x next year’s estimates.  Built into those numbers is expected earnings growth of 11% from 2017 to 2018. 

 

Since corporate earnings have been relatively stagnant for the last 3 years, that’s the first hurdle to jump.  Beyond that, you need a point of view on how much better/worse things will be. The best case scenario (every Dow stock earns what the most optimistic Street analyst thinks they can earn) leaves us with US equities trading at 14.8x next year.  That is clearly cheap.  And if every Dow stock earns only what the most pessimistic analyst has in their model?  Then US stocks trade for 18.6x next year.  With US rates as low as they are, that is expensive but not horribly so.

 

Bottom line: if you believe that some parts of the “Trump agenda” will pass at any point this year, the upside earnings case is correct (if not low).  And if you don’t, sell.  Now.

“There are two times in a man’s life when he should not speculate; when he can afford it, and when he can’t.”  Mark Twain

“The wages of sin are death, but by the time taxes are taken out, it’s just sort of a tired feeling.”  Paula Poundstone

“Dogs have no money.  They’re broke their entirely lives.  You know why dogs have no money?  No pockets.”  Jerry Seinfeld

No reason for those quotes, aside from a little levity.  Last week was a long week, with the post-Trump speech rally, the market suddenly realizing the Fed may be serious about raising rates this month, and today’s Snap IPO all making for a busy time.  And it’s not quite over yet.  Fed Chair Yellen has a speech to the Executives’ Club of Chicago at 1pm on Friday afternoon.

Therefore we’ll keep this note brief and simply address one question: “Are US stocks too expensive to either buy or continue to own?”  No, it’s not an easy question.  And its only truthful answer is, sadly, another question.

“What do you believe?”  Since asset prices reflect the market’s baseline investment scenario, valuation analysis is really the business of measuring how different you are from the herd that sets those prices.  Simply doing a Price-Earnings ratio isn’t much of an investment edge.  Everyone has access to a calculator. But by knowing the market’s expectations for financial results and operating metrics, you can place your beliefs in sharp relief with the market’s perspective.  When your expectations are markedly different from those that other investors believe, you’ve got yourself an investment case.

Let’s take a simple example – the companies of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  The 30 companies of the Dow have scores of Wall Street analysts following them, each publishing an earnings model with estimates for 2017 and 2018 earnings.  Some are higher than average, and some are lower.  Typically, investors assume that the most likely outcome is close to the average, plus a few pennies (companies tend to beat the consensus by a few percentage points).

Based on the consensus numbers, here’s the current valuation for the Dow:

  • On average, analysts expect the 30 companies of the Dow to grow earnings by 11% from 2017 to 2018.
  • Mean valuation multiples for the Dow companies are 18.6x 2017 earnings estimates and 16.6x next year.
  • On balance, analysts expect that every Dow company will grow their earnings per share in 2018 versus this year. The range here goes from 3% (IBM and Verizon) to 16/18% (Visa and ExxonMobil) to 32-42% (Chevron and Caterpillar).
  • Based on this data, most investors would say that US stocks are “Fairly valued” on this year’s almost-19x multiple. The more charitable ones might say “If you can wait until the end of this year, you might see stocks trend higher because that 16.6x multiple on 2018 is still cheap.”

Now, here’s the trick to this analysis: it’s wrong. It is either:

  • Too high because analysts always start out too high and bring their numbers down as the year progresses.
  • Or too low because despite a very obvious equity rally on expectations for lower corporate taxes and infrastructure investment, not one analyst we know has yet raised their numbers to reflect that fact.

We went through and pulled not just the consensus earnings numbers for the Dow names, but also the highest and lowest numbers any analyst is willing to put in print. That analysis is below.

The upshot of this analysis is the following:

  • If every best-case-scenario estimate is correct, the Dow trades for 17.3x this year’s earnings per share and 14.8x next year. Instead of 11% earnings growth, these numbers work out to 16% growth.
  • If the worst case scenario is correct, those multiple are 19.7x and 18.6x for 2017/2018 numbers, respectively. Average Dow company earnings growth in this scenario is just 6%.
  • Remember: best case scenario estimates still include little-to-no adjustments for lower tax rates from a Trump economic plan.
  • While admitted a crude measure, PE ratios of 17x/14x for the bull case look cheap and 20x/19x for the bear case are clearly too expensive for 6% earnings growth in a rising rate environment. (Remember those 3 rates increases we’re baking into asset prices for the year?)

My takeaway: this valuation work shows two things:

  • You have to believe there will be some change in US fiscal policy to continue to own equities. Stocks are too expensive otherwise.  Now, it doesn’t have to be the Trump Trifecta of lower personal/corporate taxes, deregulation and infrastructure.  Any two of the three in sufficient scale probably gets us more than 11% earnings growth next year.  Frankly, changes to the tax code alone probably get us there if corporations end up paying 20% instead of 35% of pretax profits.
  • Everything else has to go right. Remember that corporate profit margins are higher than long run averages, unemployment is relatively low, and long term interest rates are still below 2.5% on the 10 year US Treasury.  At current valuations we can’t afford to lose any of those natural tailwinds to economic growth and corporate earnings.

It could well be that US investors are taking to heart the words of Oscar Wilde: “Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination.”  US stock markets clearly do not have that problem at the moment.

via http://ift.tt/2lUNMbN Tyler Durden

CNN Airs ‘Spy Cam’ Footage Of Trump Oval Office Meeting As If It’s Perfectly Acceptable

Over the weekend, CNN released ‘spy cam’ footage of a “fiery” meeting in the oval office and used it to report that an angry President Trump lashed out at his senior staff in an “expletive-laced” tirade over their “fumbling” of the Sessions recusal which he thought was premature and overshadowed his speech to Congress.   

Of course, while the mainstream media was all too eager to spread the word of more dysfunction in the Trump White House, no one seemed to care to ask the obvious question of why it is suddenly ok for CNN to be filming private, and potentially classified, meetings in the Oval Office.  Moreover, if it is somehow permissible to film potentially classified meetings, which we can’t imagine it is, we do wonder where all of CNN’s footage is of Obama’s oval office meetings?  We’re sure they “do not recall.”

 

Meanwhile, it’s painfully obvious that CNN completely fabricated the narrative around the meeting as their own ‘news’ anchor even admits that their “anonymous” sources were not aware of what the meeting was even about.  Moreover, since the meeting was ‘closed door’, it’s difficult to understand how CNN’s source could have possibly known Trump’s demeanor and/or whether he used “a lot of expletives”, as the story states, unless that source was actually in the meeting.

That said, here is the narrative that CNN linked to the meeting:  

President Donald Trump is extremely frustrated with his senior staff and communications team for allowing the firestorm surrounding Attorney General Jeff Sessions to steal his thunder in the wake of his address to Congress, sources tell CNN.

 

“Nobody has seen him that upset,” one source said, adding the feeling was the communications team allowed the Sessions news, which the administration deemed a nonstory, to overtake the narrative.

 

On Thursday, Sessions recused himself from any current or future investigations into ties between Russia and the Trump campaign after it was reported he had met with the Russian ambassador to the US, something he had previously failed to disclose.

 

In particular, the renewed focus on Russia is seen as a major letdown after Tuesday when top officials were riding high, congratulating one another on Trump’s speech to Congress.

 

“The staff fumbled,” Trump told the team for not being prepared when the Sessions story came out, according to another source.

 

When the President returned to the White House Thursday evening from a day trip to Virginia, there were “a lot of expletives.” The source said for more than a week Trump had been lamenting that his senior staff “just keep getting in their own way.”

Meanwhile, just a couple of hours after the Oval Office meeting, Trump tweeted his now infamous accusations that Obama ordered the tapping of his Trump Tower phone lines.

 

So, just to summarize, in the end, all CNN really revealed was that i) they have a spy cam setup to film the oval office and ii) Steve Bannon pointed his finger at someone. Yet another great piece of ‘fake news’ courtesy of CNN.

via http://ift.tt/2lULWYo Tyler Durden

Great Expectations (Not)

Via Howard Kunstler of Kunstler.com,

Halloween’s coming super-early this year and it will be a shocking surprise to those currently busy looking for Russians behind every potted plant in Washington DC. First, accept the premise that your country has lost its mind.

This is what happens when societies (and individuals) can’t face the true quandaries of a particular moment in their history. All of their attention gets channeled into fantasy: spooks, sexual freakery, conspiracies, persecution narratives, savior fairy tales. It’s been quite a cavalcade of unreality for the past six months, with great entertainment value for connoisseurs of the bizarre — until you’re reminded that the fate of the nation is at stake.

The questions Americans might more profitably ask ourselves: can we continue living the way we do? And by what means? These matters of home economics have been sequestered in some forgotten storage unit of the collective mind for at least a year while a clock ticks in the time-bomb that sits on the national welcome mat. That bomb is made of financial plutonium and it’s getting ready to blow. When it does, all the distracting spookery and freakery will vaporize and the shell-shocked citizens will have a clear view of the bleak, toxic, devastated landscape they actually inhabit.

March 15 is when the temporary suspension of the national debt ceiling — engineered in a 2015 deal between Barack Obama and then House Speaker John Boehner — finally expires, meaning the government loses its authority to continue borrowing money. The chance that congress can pass a bill raising the debt ceiling to enable further borrowing is about the same as the chance that Xi Jinping will send every American household a dim sum breakfast next Sunday morning by FedEx. The US treasury will then be left with around $200 billion in walking-around money, at a burn rate of about $90 billion a month — meaning that that around June sometime the country won’t be able to pay invoices, issue salaries, send out entitlement checks, or do anything, really. It means pure government paralysis. It means no infrastructure spending jamboree, no “great” wall, no military shopping spree, none of the Great Expectations sewn into the golden fleece of Trumptopia.

Meanwhile, over the next few weeks, Janet Yellen and her crew of economic astrologasters at the Federal Reserve will have to put up or shut up vis-à-vis raising the interest rate on the basic overnight lending rate. The Las Vegas odds of it being raised currently stand at around 95 percent. So, they will be running that play around the time that the debt ceiling issue materializes into a live-action event. Of course, the Fed could welsh on its carefully-scripted previous hints and utterances and do nothing. But that option would probably extinguish the last remaining shreds of the Fed’s credibility, since they’ve been jive-talking about raising rates since they began “tapering” the QE bond-buying spree in the spring of 2013, i.e., a long time ago. The Fed’s credibility is synonymous with the dollar’s credibility. Look out below.

If those 95 percent odds are correct, the end of all that lovely cheap money will be the death of the Trumphoria stock market zoom as all algo hell breaks loose in Wall Street’s server farms and the trend is no longer anyone’s friend. Enter, stage left, the unintended consequences and diminishing returns of computer technology ripping apart the financial expectations of every banking official from Shanghai to 20th Street and Constitution Avenue. The American public will be left out in the parking lot with its head spinning.

So, enjoy the last few weeks of artificial Russia hysteria and LBGTQ bathroom neurosis. You’ll have other things to think about as the daffodils come peeping through the garden loam – like what to use for money to buy stuff if, perchance, the ATM machines go to lockdown, and anyway, after three days of that there won’t even be anything to buy (or steal)  at the local supermarket, given the fragility of our supply chains. I know this sounds a little extreme, like Zombie Apocalypse, but you won’t actually see any zombies around. They were just part of the perpetual freak show of the mind that is being shoved aside for the starker theatrics of reality.

via http://ift.tt/2mua0o4 Tyler Durden

Trump’s Closest Advisers Spend Millions On Washington Real Estate

It's not just the Obamas that are moving into swanky mansions across Washington D.C.. This last weekend saw two $12-million-plus homes sold in the D.C. area with realtors noting "Trump's bringing people from outside a local market…and they’re coming from a much more expensive market."

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is the buyer who shelled out $12.6 million for a nine-bedroom home overlooking Rock Creek Park.

As The Washington Business Journal's Sara Gilmore reports, this is just the latest in the string of multimillion dollar home sales fueled by Trump administration officials.

Mnuchin, a former Goldman Sachs official, bought the house Feb. 14, according to real estate sources. Public records list the buyer as Rock Creek Drive Revocable Trust. Washingtonian reported in January that Mnuchin had a home under contract but the exact location wasn't known.

The sale was followed three days later by the $12 million sale of a home at 9641 Georgetown Pike in Great Falls.

One sale at that level is rare for D.C. in any month, let alone two.

“Trump is certainly an outsider and he’s bringing people from outside a local market,” said Michael Rankin with Sotheby’s International Realty in D.C., “and they’re coming from a much more expensive market.”

via http://ift.tt/2mxpUi6 Tyler Durden

Americans are Caught Between Trump’s Lies and Clapper’s Lies. That’s Why Trust in Institutions Keeps Declining

Americans’ trust in government institutions is at an all-time low, with fewer than 20 percent of Americans believing they can trust the government to do the right thing “most of the time,” according to the Pew Research Center.

This weekend provided the perfect example of why trust has eroded away—down from a high of 73 percent about 60 years ago, Pew says—and why it’s so difficult to rebuild.

It started Saturday morning, around 6 a.m., when President Donald Trump fired off a series of tweets making wild accusations about being the target of wiretapping by the Obama administration.

Trump appears to have been referencing a report published Friday by Breitbart News, repeating claims made Thursday night by conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin. Levin postulated that then-President Barack Obama had ordered surveillance of Trump’s campaign in June and again in October, seemingly drawing from earlier reporting by Heat Street and The Guardian showing that the FBI received a warrant from the secret FISA court to investigate a server housed in Trump Tower and suspected of being connected to Russian banks (read Julian Sanchez’ detailed analysis if you want all the gory details of what we know about the FISA court warrant and what it could mean).

Whether Trump is right or wrong, it’s a serious allegation that deserves to be treated as such. If he’s wrong—and so far he’s offered no evidence to back-up his claim—then all he’s done is turn legitimate concerns about the limits of mass surveillance into a partisan political issue in a weird attempt to smear the last administration for engaging in what may turn out to be an entirely legitimate investigation into Trump’s business ties with Russian banks. If he’s right, we have a full blown political scandal on our hands.

Part of what makes this whole episode so ugly—and so telling—is that it’s hard to trust anyone in a position of authority to tell us the whole truth. One of the people who should be in a position to set the record straight is James Clapper, who served as Director of National Intelligence during the Obama administration. Clapper made an effort to do exactly that on Sunday, appearing on NBC’s Meet The Press to say that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president, the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”

He should be the authority on the subject. We should trust him when he says something definitive about the targets of America’s surveillance state.

There’s just one problem: James Clapper is a known liar.

It’s been nearly four years since Clapper sat before Congress and fielded a question from Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) about whether the National Security Agency was collecting “any type of data at all” on American citizens.

“No, sir,” he replied. Wyden repeated the question. “Not wittingly,” said Clapper.

That was all a lie, and we know it was a lie thanks to Edward Snowden, who exposed the depth of the NSA’s domestic surveillance programs just a few months after Clapper’s March 2013 congressional testimony.

In 2017, Americans find themselves trapped between James Clapper and Donald Trump.

On one hand, there are government officials who are incompetent or clueless and tell lies in an effort to hide their incompetence and cluelessness. Trump is pushing the boundaries of this category with the sheer brashness of his tall tales, but he’s not really all that different from the bumbling officials who mishandled the waitlists at the Department of Veteran’s Affairs or anyone who argues that the current state of America’s entitlements are sustainable in the long-term. These people tell lies, or at least stretch the truth, because they don’t know what they are doing—they are trying to hide a problem until someone else can come along to deal with it, or, as often seems to be the case with Trump, they are trying distract the media’s attention from one mess by creating another.

On the other hand, there the James Clappers of the world, who know exactly what they are doing. Their lies deliberately mislead the public because they believe something else—national security, as Clapper claimed after being caught in his lie to Congress—is more important than truth. These are the “if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period” lies. They are the lies about not having any classified information on your private email server, when in fact you do.

This is not meant to suggest a hierarchy of any kind. There aren’t less bad forms of lies. Both kinds lead to general mistrust towards the people (and institutions) who tell them, and sometimes lead to worse than that (see Iraq, invasion of).

It’s not a surprise, then, to learn that Americans are less likely trust the government than they used to be. Annual surveys by Gallup show that trust in government has declined by more than 20 percentage points—from 63 percent to 42 percent—since 2004. “Americans’ trust in political leaders and in the American people as a whole began declining during George W. Bush’s second term, the same time their confidence in nonpolitical institutions started heading downward,” Gallup noted in September. “These trends have yet to recover.”

Over the longer term, the trend as been pointed steadily downwards since the early 1960s, despite a brief rebound in the 1990s, as Pew notes.

Nothing that happened this weekend—indeed, little that has happened since the election—makes you believe that a recovery in trust is coming.

The two types I’ve identified here have a symbiotic relationship in eroding trust in government. Clapper-style misinformation sticks in the mind more clearly than Trump-style bullshit, because it’s a more clear violation of the trust bestowed on government officials. In turn, the Clapper-esque lies create space for the Trump-esque lies to grow, because they weaken the institutional trust that should contain such nonsense by showing it to be false.

Think about it like this: Trump has offered no evidence that his explosive claims are true, and he’s notorious for lying, exaggerating, and generally bullshitting about practically everything. Absent any serious evidence, there’s no reason to take his claim seriously.

And yet.

And yet, we can’t feel completely confident that Clapper is telling the truth. His personal lies have tarnished our confidence in him, just as the volume of lies from all corners of government make it difficult to have faith in the institutions of government as a whole. That’s exactly how Americans are responding, if the polls are to be believed: by adopting a stance of broad skepticism towards everything they hear from government, whether in congressional testimony or in presidential tweets.

I’m not sure how, or if, that trend can be reversed, but I suspect that Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Nebraska) at least identified the path forward for anyone who wants to attempt it. In a statement released Saturday about Trump’s wiretap allegations, Sasse called for a vigorous and public review of how the secret FISA Court operates. “We are in the midst of a civilization-warping crisis of public trust,” Sasse said. “A quest for the full truth, rather than knee-jerk partisanship, must be our guide if we are going to rebuild civic trust and health.”

Unfortunately, we’re surrounded by known liars. The only thing we can know for sure, right now, is that either Trump or Clapper is lying again—and that’s enough to continue the erosion of trust, no matter who is telling the truth.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2lUxJea
via IFTTT

Here Are The Top 15 ‘Obamagate’ Wiretap Victims

Via Jim Hoft of The Gateway Pundit blog,

The Main Stream Media and other enemies of the current President are challenging the proposition that President Obama wire tapped President Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential race. President Trump started this discussion with his tweets over the weekend, but it should be clear that it is not unfounded that former President Obama would wire tap President Trump during the election process

This is because he has done this before.  Here is a list of individuals who were wire tapped by the Obama Administration.

WikiLeaks released the following list on February 23rd (see link here) of Obama Administration wire taps:

The US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between 1. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and 2. German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;

 

Obama bugged 3. Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;

 

Obama singled out the 4. Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;

 

Obama stole sensitive 5. Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu;

 

Obama intercepted 6. top EU and 7. Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);

 

Obama explicitly targeted 8. five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;

 

Obama explicitly targetted the phones of 9. Italy’s ambassador to NATO and 10. other top Italian officials for long term interception; and

 

Obama intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then 11. French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berlusconi, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.

In addition to the above list we also know now that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration.  It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:

In 2013 the liberal Washington Post expressed outrage after the revelation that 12. the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks.  The reporter, Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.

 

Also in 2013, 13. members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance.  The ultra liberal New Yorker even noted that “In moderate and liberal circles, at least, the phone-records scandal, partly because it involves the dear old A.P. and partly because it raises anew the specter of Big Brother, may well present the most serious threat to Obama’s reputation.”

 

14. Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to the Obama administration.  A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.

Update – 15. WikiLeaks tweeted overnight that the Obama Administration spied on their journalists as well:

Obama is no stranger to wire tapping.  His administration tapped phones and computers of friends and foe alike.

Finally, we ask The New York Times, was this fake news?

via http://ift.tt/2lUnp5O Tyler Durden

When The Tidal Wave Hits, Part I

 

Interested in precious metals investing or storage? Contact us HERE 

 

 

 

 

When The Tidal Wave Hits, Part I

Written by Jeff Nielson (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)

 

 

 

 

Disaster is nearly upon us. This has been a regular theme in these commentaries for several years. Increasingly, however, these warnings draw reactions of apathy rather than alarm. The fact that our house-of-cards economies (and societies) have not already unraveled does not mean that this was a false alarm. It means that disaster has gotten much more imminent.


When straight discourse fails to convey a message, writers typically resort to a metaphor. But which one? The phrase “the perfect storm” has been popularized in our culture. However, to an audience which perceives itself to be standing on dry land, that metaphor would likely fall flat.


A much more illuminating metaphor is the tidal wave.


Readers who are warned that an economic crash is coming think to themselves, “I’ve seen an economic crash before.” That would be the Crash of ’08. Call that a once-in-a-generation event. They’ve heard of the Crash of ’29 and the Great Depression that followed. Call that a once-in-a-lifetime event.


The average person has a vague understanding of the Crash of ’08, but that was a very understated dress rehearsal of what is coming. Except for the most elderly members of our societies, we have no personal recollection at all of either the Crash of ’29 or the Great Depression. Yet most people reading this will tell themselves they “understand” what is coming.


Now think about a tidal wave. People living on islands in the ocean or particularly exposed coastlines will have witnessed terrible storms – and the magnitude of the waves that such storms generate. Perhaps once in a generation they will witness a truly horrific storm and commensurately greater waves. Recorded history may describe once-in-a-century (or longer) “perfect storms”, supposedly producing the ultimate waves.


Residents of these islands and coastal areas prepare for terrible storms. Many will prepare for truly horrific storms. A few may even prepare for the perfect storm. But no one anticipates a tidal wave, a wave greater than anything that is possible, under normal circumstances. There is only one way to prepare for a tidal wave: escape to higher ground before the wave hits.


What evidence is there that an economic tidal wave is approaching – an event for which there is no historical precedent?


We’re saturated with the evidence. We’re assaulted with the evidence. We’re drowning in the evidence.


Debt


There is no historical precedent for the endemic levels of debt which exist around most of the world, and which reach their sickening pinnacle in the West. Readers have been warned that a Debt Jubilee is coming.


Many nations now have levels of debt which could never be brought under control, let alone ever retired. If these nations were corporations they would have already been forced to declare bankruptcy. Instead, thanks to the fraud of the fiat-currency printing press, they delay those bankruptcies – through flooding our economies with their absolutely worthless paper.


Judging by the apathetic response to warnings of “Debt Jubilee”, apparently a mistaken impression has been created. Debt Jubilee: everyone’s debts are wiped clean. A cause for celebration, right? Wrong.


Before we ever see a Debt Jubilee, we will see a level of economic pain which few people reading this can imagine. It will have to be a level of economic pain sufficient to cause our corrupt governments to collectively emancipate us from our current Debt Slavery.


Look at Greece. Look at the level of economic pain which has already been inflicted upon that population. Official unemployment is greater than 20%. Official youth unemployment is over 50%. The real numbers are significantly worse. Ninety percent of the unemployed are paid no unemployment insurance.


The suicide rate in Greece has more than doubled. At one point, it increased by more than 40% in just five months. Greece and its citizens still have their Debt Slavery. Debt Jubilee is a necessity, but to get there we will likely have to live through a nightmare beyond comprehension.


Asset bubbles


We’ve all seen asset bubbles before, right? We’ve seen them pop. We understand what that means. Wrong.


The number of asset bubbles which currently surround us and the magnitude of these bubbles is historically unprecedented. The rupturing of these bubbles will be an event for which there is no historical precedent.


Look at our interest rates! They have not simply been taken to the lowest levels in the entire history of our nations. They have been taken to these reckless levels and left there, permanently. Low interest rates fuel asset bubbles, the definition of “easy money”.


The lowest interest rates in history, permanently frozen there by the criminal central banks, are rocket fuel for asset bubbles. What happens when these rockets run out of fuel – and start plummeting back toward Earth?


We don’t simply have the largest bond bubbles in history in the Western world. As already noted, all of these governments are bankrupt. Their bonds are not “overvalued”. They are worthless. Tens of trillions in supposed “assets” are about to go poof!


Then we have the stock market bubbles. People look at the bubbles in Western equity markets in absolute terms and think to themselves: they’re not that bad. Wrong.


In typical stock market bubbles, back when we had at least semi-legitimate economies and semi-legitimate markets, valuations would get inflated during economic booms.


That’s not what we have been seeing for the last eight years. Since the Crash of ’08; Western economies have not “grown”. They have gotten sicker and sicker and sicker. In Europe, the scorched-earth policy known as Austerity has already reduced many of the Euro zone economies to rubble.


Those economies not already in ruin are experiencing faux prosperity. Even as poverty rates soar, the majorities in luckier nations still think they are “doing OK”. Wrong.


While real wages continue to sink for the vast majority, their “prosperity” is derived from the illusory wealth contained in – wait for it – asset bubbles.


Yet for eight years, Western stock markets have been rising, not falling. In the U.S., markets have been rising rapidly, and now almost vertically. The reality-gap in our stock markets has never been greater, especially in the U.S. – greater even than before the Crash of ’29. There’s a reason why 86-year-old Warren Buffett has got $85 billion of his vampire-dollars sitting on the sideline.


Many readers will still be clinging to a false sense of security. They have their homes. For readers living in one of Canada’s or the U.S.’s extreme bubble-markets, most likely they look at their homes as being roughly equivalent to the Crown Jewels. Fool’s Gold.


Eight years of the lowest interest rates in history. Eight years of the easiest money in history. Eight years of the lowest mortgage rates in history. And many Western real estate markets were already seriously inflated before that.


Never before have Western real estate valuations become so wildly inflated. Never before have we seen populations which were so cash-poor but (supposedly) land-rich. What happens when millions of these cash-poor people lose their jobs and become cash-poor to the point of desperation?


They will all try to sell their homes, at the same time, in markets which were already in free-fall. The real estate bubbles will burst before the real job losses hit – job losses which will be collateral damage from all of these asset bubbles simultaneously bursting.


How low is low?


Bubble markets like Vancouver and Toronto are quadruple any sort of rational valuation. That implies prices falling by 75% in those markets. However, in “crashes” markets always overshoot on the way down. Think 90% losses before a final bottom is in – whenever that might be.


The good news for readers living outside of the extreme bubble markets is that their land is not nearly as grossly overvalued. The bad news is that they will not be spared severe pain. The horrific crashes guaranteed for Toronto, Vancouver, and equivalent cities in the U.S. will severely depress all markets like a contagious disease. Those homeowners thinking they will be spared at least a 50% hair-cut are living in a Fool’s Paradise.


As all these asset bubbles all start to implode simultaneously, $10’s of trillions in illusory Western wealth will evaporate (not counting the $1+ quadrillion in the derivatives market which will also disintegrate). Any bonds you hold will be worthless. Any stocks you hold will (with rare exceptions) retain only a small fraction of their current price. Any real estate you hold will retain only a small fraction of its current price.


Our debts and our asset bubbles are only some of the economic diseases which are already far worse than at any other time in our history. Part II will address more of these horrific economic diseases and then turn to some of the political and social diseases from which we suffer – which are also far worse than at any other time in our history.

 

 

Questions or comments about this article? Leave your thoughts HERE.

 

 

 

 

When The Tidal Wave Hits, Part I

Written by Jeff Nielson (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)

via http://ift.tt/2mucy5t Sprott Money

Storm Leaves 600,000 French Households Without Power

According to French electricity grid operator Enedis, winter storm Zeus which unleashed hurricane-force winds across much of southern France, has left more than 600,000 French households without power as of 4pm on Monday. The company’s website advises that the power cuts have affected 175,000 customers in Brittany, 190,000 in Auvergne Rhone Alpes, 130,000 in Nouvelle Aquitaine, 80,000 in Pays de Loire, and the company advises that more than 3,500 technicians from Enedis are working in the field to deal with “very major” storm damage.

Earlier in the day, The Local reported that weather warnings are in place for large swathes of France as wind speeds hit over 190km/hr on Monday. National weather agency Météo France updated the number of departments on orange alert to 31 on Monday morning, as fierce winds lashed much of the country. The town of Camaret, in Brittany, already saw record winds of 193km/hr during Monday morning, reported Europe 1 radio. 

An orange alert is the second highest alert on the agency’s scale, and urges residents to be vigilant.

Winds are expected to reach up to 150km/hr on Brittany’s coastline and 120km/hr inland. Heavy rainfall has been predicted in some areas too.  The agency said that residents could expect “significant damage” caused by the wind and disruptions to local traffic. 

It warned that there was a possibility of cuts to electricity and telephone lines, and as noted above, this is precisely what has happened.  The agency warned residents in affected areas to stay off the rooftops and to secure objects that are liable to be blown away.

Elswhere, the entire island of Corsica was issued an orange alert for flood risks as well as “particularly strong winds”. Residents were told to avoid getting too close to the sea, or indeed anywhere that was already flooded. The warnings are in place until Tuesday at 10am.

via http://ift.tt/2muctyG Tyler Durden