“Mr. Yen” Warns USDJPY May Hit 100 By Year-End

Having correctly predicting the yen’s advance beyond 115 and then 110 per dollar, former Japanese Finance Minister Eisuke Sakakibara now says Japan’s currency may strengthen to 100 by year-end.

As Bloomberg reports, having been in charge of currency intervention in Japan, Sakakibura was dubbed Mr. Yen for his ability to influence the exchange rate in the 1990s, seems to suggest – uinlike Suga overnight – that intervention is unlikely (or unlikley to be successful).

The yen has renewed its highs despite increased rhetoric from Japanese officials in the past week aimed at restraining its advance. Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said Monday financial markets continue to be volatile, and he is watching the effect on the economy.  

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga reiterated the government is watching foreign-exchange movements “with vigilance,” and will take appropriate action if necessary. A weaker currency has been a linchpin of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s program to stoke a recovery and exit deflation.

 

A yen at 105 per dollar is “no problem” for Japan’s economy, the 75-year-old Sakakibara, who is currently a professor at Aoyama Gakuin University, said in a Bloomberg Television interview.

 

Any currency intervention can only be done with agreement from the U.S. and other counter parties, he said.

While noting that 105 would be "no problem" for Japan's economy, we suspect the implied drop in the S&P 500 to 1550 would be a problem for the world's "economy".

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1MqjUQs Tyler Durden

Some L.A. Unionized Hotel Workers Realize They’ve Been Screwed Over

Hotel roomCalifornia’s upcoming, poorly thought out (beyond the political gains) massive minimum wage boost to $15 per hour does not grant unions an exemption. They will not be permitted to “collectively bargain” away the price floor in exchange for other benefits, just like businesses who are not unionized.

While most folks may assume that this has always been the case, in reality, cities and municipalities that have set their own minimum wages and other employment mandates have included exemptions for unions. Many people aren’t aware of it, and it may seem odd on the surface, given that the unions themselves are pushing for the increases.

This is what happened in Los Angeles when the city mandated a special minimum wage of $15.37 that applied only to hotel workers. It included an exemption for workers represented by unions, which essentially meant this minimum wage was really a fine for not being unionized. Over the weekend, the Los Angeles Times took note that there are union workers that feel betrayed by these agreements and realize exactly what they’re for—to help unions expand their power and membership, not to actually help workers:

Alicia Yale, 42, a waitress at the Sheraton Universal, said she’s dumbfounded that Unite Here Local 11, which represents hotel employees in Los Angeles and Orange counties, fought for her to make less money than workers at non-union hotels.

“Why is it more of a benefit to be in a union? The union isn’t really doing anything for us,” she said. “It’s completely upside-down. They want to pay us less than the minimum wage.”

Yale, a mother of two young children, said she was unconvinced by labor leaders’ arguments that the exemptions were designed to secure better benefits. She said many low-wage workers at the Sheraton lack health insurance because the union’s contract requires them to work at least 100 hours a month for five consecutive months to qualify.

Another hotel worker said she was bluntly told exactly why the exemptions existed:

Penny Moore, a bartender and former union shop steward at the Sheraton Universal, said she was perplexed in the weeks after the 2014 law passed when a Sheraton human-resources official told her that many employees would not be getting the promised pay raise. After phoning the union office, she said, she received a call from Unite Here Local 11 organizer Fred Pascual.

“He said I’ve got to look at the bigger picture,” Moore said, that “this is going to make all the hotels go union.” She said Pascual did not elaborate on his remark, but she interpreted it to mean hotels would embrace collective bargaining agreements in order to pay less.

“There is no other purpose for it,” said Moore, who already makes more than $16 an hour and did not stand to benefit from the increase. “It doesn’t make me happy to have to attack them like this. But the alternative is my co-workers” lose out. “And that’s not OK.”

I wouldn’t expect Unite Here to care much about Moore’s criticism. The Times notes that the union has seen a 73 percent increase in membership since they’ve embarked on this effort to control hotel wages in a time when private unions are seeing drops.

Of course, now that California has a new minimum wage mandate, this exemption will be phased out. The state minimum wage law does not forbid union-negotiated undercutting.

Sadly, while the story looks at the difference in pay for union hotels vs. non-union hotels, it does not consider what it all means for employment figures. Have those non-union hotels had to cut positions or freeze hiring to pay for these new burdens? It doesn’t say. It may well be that the reason those union workers even have jobs is because of the exemption the union negotiated that their non-union opposition could not have.

But apparently the fight over who has to pay Los Angeles’ $15 minimum wage (passed and planned to be phased in before the new state shift) will continue in the meantime. As Matt Welch noted before, unions attempted to get the same exemption in a city-wide increase but failed. But they’re not giving up. There are “add-on clauses” under consideration this week that could affect who will have to pay.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/25VAZbf
via IFTTT

White House Issues Following Statement After Meeting Between Obama And Yellen

The closed-door meeting between Obama, Biden and Yellen has concluded, and moments ago the White House released the following statement:

“The President and Chair Yellen met this afternoon in the Oval Office as part of an ongoing dialogue on the state of the economy. They discussed both the near and long-term growth outlook, the state of the labor market, inequality, and potential risks to the economy, both in the United States and globally. They also discussed the significant progress that has been made through the continued implementation of Wall Street Reform to strengthen our financial system and protect consumers.”

Of course, for the actual transcript of what was said, we will have to rely on some conscientious White House leaker putting it on BitTorrent, but here is our modest attempt at translating what was and what was not said: no market crashes allowed until November.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/22pHezo Tyler Durden

“The Pirates Are Coming” – Iceland’s Pirate Party Polls at 43% Following the PM’s Resignation

Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 3.05.50 PM

The most fascinating and encouraging political movement occurring anywhere on earth at the moment is taking place in the tiny nation of Iceland. No, it has nothing to do with the recent resignation of the country’s Prime Minister after it was discovered via the Panama Papers that he and his wife owned Icelandic bank debt through an undisclosed offshore vehicle. What I’m referring to is the exponential popularity of the less than four-year-old “Pirate Party.”

So what is the Pirate Party? Motherboard explains:

Over 20,000 protesters descended on the Icelandic capital of Reykjavik last week following the release of the Panama Papers, over 11 million files from the database of Mossack Fonseca, one the world’s largest offshore law firms. Gathered in front of the Icelandic Parliamentary building, the protesters were calling for the resignation of their prime minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson after the Panama Papers revealed that he and his wife had major financial conflict of interest tied up in a shell company in the British Virgin Islands.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/20wjhXO
via IFTTT

Behold Accounting Magic 101: This Is How Alcoa Just “Beat” Consensus EPS

Some companies are notorious for buying back billions in stock in order to mask the decline in their earnings by reducing the number of shares outstanding. Alcoa, which still has a major debt overhang from the last financial crisis, is unable to do that as it simply does not have the free cash flow to dedicate to shareholder friendly activities. Instead, Klaus Kleinfeld’s company is forced to resort to an even more primitive form of EPS fudging: massive quarterly EPS addbacks.

And as we showed last quarter, AA’s addbacks just hit an all time high.

We were curious if as a result of this “bathwater” quarter, Alcoa would finally cease this deceptive practice.

The answer: not even close.

Moments ago, Alcoa reported adjusted EPS of $0.07, or $108 million in adjusted net income, beating consensus expectations of $0.02 handily (nevermind that it missed consensus revenues of $5.2 billion by a whopping $250 million, a drop of 15% from a year ago).

There is, alas, a problem with these adjusted “earnings”, because on a actual, GAAP basis, Alcoa actually reported its latest GAAP whopper, according to which GAAP EPS was actually… $0.00, thanks to a paltry $16mm in net income. 

How did Alcoa “fill the gap?” Simple: with its usual millions in “one-time” charges, in this case $61 million.

But it is on an LTM basis that the company has absolutely outdone itself.

Here, things get downright comical, because whereas Alcoa’s GAAP Net Income for the LTM period ended December 31 was a net loss of $501 million, when one adds back all the charges incurred over the past 12 months, the “net income”, on a non-GAAP Basis of course, soars to a ridiculous $532 million. The plug? “One-time, non-recurring” addbacks and various other restructuring charges amounting to over $1 billion for the LTM period!

 

Said otherwise, more than all of Alcoa’s earnings in the last 12 months were the result of “non-recurring” addbacks, “one-time” charges, and other proforma changes to the non-GAAP net income number.

And that, ladies and gentlemtn, is non-GAAP accounting magic 101.

Oh, we almost forgot: here is the history of Alcoa’s $0.02 EPS “consensus” which the company had to take a record addback in order to “beat”…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Wo96V0 Tyler Durden

“Credit-Dollars” – The Fatal Flaw In The System

Submitted by Bill Bonner of Bonner & Partners (annotated by Acting-Man.com's Pater Tenebrarum),

The Hard Rocks of Real Life

The Dow dropped 174 points on Thursday, the biggest fall in six weeks. Not the end of the world. Maybe not even the end of this year’s bounce-back bull run. As you’ll recall, stocks sold off at the beginning of the year, too. Then, investors were buoyed up after central banks got to work – jimmying the credit market on their behalf.

 

5o1rhrdw59wk

 

The Fed swore off any further “normalization” until later in the year. Central banks in Europe, Japan, and China all took bolder and more reckless action… with the Bank of Japan following some European banks by going into “full retard” mode with negative interest rates.

 

1-DJIA-10-minute chart

DJIA, 10-minute candles; the red rectangle bounds Thursday’s market action. A rebound attempt on Friday failed to go very far – click to enlarge.

 

Now, according to the narrative popular in the financial press, investors are beginning to worry that central banks are not very effective after all. As to that last point, they’re right; central banks can only do so much. They made the situation what it is. Now, they can only make it worse. How? By adding more of what made it bad in the first place. All they can do is add more debt to a world already drowning in it.

If anyone knows of a different way this story might unfold, we’d like to hear it. But for all the puzzling and preposterous guesswork and wondering, it is still the same tale: Debt builds up; debtors can’t pay; they go broke. It happens all the time.

In a healthy economy – with real money and honest banking – people make mistakes. They go broke. The bankruptcies are absorbed and disposed of in good order. Assets go on the block. Hungry investors and entrepreneurs snap them up… and put them to good use.

The system cleans out errors, taking money from “weak hands” and moving it to stronger, more capable management. But now, the whole system is mismanaged. Thanks to credit-based money – and modern central bank guidance – the normal ebbs and flows of the credit market have become treacherous tidal waves, lifting up assets to absurd deliriums,  and then crashing them down on the hard rocks of real life.

 

Borrowers’ Busted Boards

Here’s a group of surfers whose boards have been busted recently: young people. In the news this week was this interesting item from the Wall Street Journal:

“40% of Student Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments”

 

2-Student debt, WSJ

Student debt (federal and private credit combined) amounts to over $1.2 trillion, and 43% of borrowers are by now delinquent, in default or “in postponement” (i.e., they have a waiver allowing them to be delinquent) – click to enlarge.

 

According to the WSJ, $200 billion in loans are running behind schedule. The Journal says this is good news; last year, it was 46% of borrowers who weren’t keeping up. And Bank of America tells us that corporate borrowers, too, are soon going to wash up on the beach. Here’s the report from Bloomberg:

“When the next corporate default wave comes, it could hurt investors more than they expect. Losses on bonds from defaulted companies are likely to be higher than in previous cycles because U.S. issuers have more debt relative to their assets, according to Bank of America Corp. strategists. Those high levels of borrowings mean that if a company liquidates, the proceeds have to cover more liabilities.

 

“We’ve had more corporate debt than ever, and more leverage than ever, which increases the potential for greater pain,” said Edwin Tai, a senior portfolio manager for distressed investments at Newfleet Asset Management.

 

Loss rates have already been rising… In bad times, corporate bond investors, on average, lose about 70 cents on the dollar when a borrower goes bust. In this cycle, that figure could be closer to the mid-80s [when losses approached 80 cents on the dollar], Bank of America strategists said. Those losses would be the worst in decades…”

 

3-Recovery rates

Since peaking in late 2011 just above 70%, recovery rates from corporate defaults have been in a steady downtrend –  a sign that the quality of assets underlying corporate debt has worsened considerably. This could is guaranteed to make the next major economic downturn especially painful – click to enlarge.

 

Credit Money

We warned that there is a fatal “flaw” in the system. We talked about the lack of real, physical dollars. In a credit crisis, we argued, the U.S. would quickly run out of real dollars. ATMs would shut down. The whole system would seize up. But there’s more…

We are still figuring out how it works, but this appears to be one of the most intriguing nuances of the whole cockamamie story. You see, credit has a particularity that real money doesn’t.

If I lend you a real dollar, you will have the dollar to spend, and I won’t. Then, when you pay it back, I will have the dollar to spend, and you won’t. Either way, the money supply is unchanged.

The credit dollar is different. When the banks lend you a credit dollar, they “make” it out of thin air with a few keystrokes on a computer. Then, the dollar you have to spend didn’t exist before. So far, so good. But when you pay it back, what happens? It disappears as if – well – as if it never existed. The money supply contracts.

 

4-Debt and Money

Out of whack: Total US credit market debt outstanding (blue line) = $63.4 trn.; Total US bank credit (incl. mortgages) outstanding (red line) = $22.3 trn.; US broad true money supply TMS-2 (black line) = $11.4 trn.; Currency in circulation (purple line) = $1.37 trn. – click to enlarge.

 

We should say, “even if you pay it back, the money supply contracts.” Because there are other ways the money disappears. Negative interest rates, for example, cause people to hoard cash, or even increase bank savings, as they are doing in Japan. Either way, money disappears from circulation… reducing the “velocity of money”… and dropping the available money supply. Spending goes down, not up.

The effect is the exact opposite of what the policymakers promise. Again, we see the proof that something isn’t working. Not for Janet Yellen nor for any of her delusional central banker buddies around the world. Their tricks no longer work.They just make the tidal wave higher.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1VOhTPo Tyler Durden

Trump Defends Waterboarding (Again), Texas A.G. Charged (Again), Virginia Gov. Won’t Authorize Electric Chair: P.M. Links

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don’t forget to sign up for Reason’s daily updates for more content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/25VuzZw
via IFTTT

Will the Real Jackie Robinson Finally Be Allowed to Stand Up Tonight?

April 15 marks the 69th anniversary of Jackie Robinson breaking baseball’s racist gentlemen’s agreement to bar players with dark complexions from competing in the Major Leagues. As per usual, every pro ballplayer will wear Robinson’s otherwise retired number 42 on Friday; also, Adidas has unveiled special Jackie Robinson cleats for the occasion, the city of Philadelphia has issued an official apology for pelting him with racist taunts back in ’47, and so on.

Over the years I have argued in these pages that the inevitable and proper lionization of the man has crowded out the nuance and individuality that made the real Jackie Robinson, if anything, greater than his myth. He was fueled by an almost alarming competitive fury, played the role of both baseball’s Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, was a prolific (if often ghosted) published writer, a businessman, Rockefeller Republican, and many things besides. He would not fit in your boxes, refused to sit in the back of your bus (quite literally, and a decade before Rosa Parks tried), and proves stubbornly hard to co-opt wholesale into whatever your contemporary politics might be.

That’s why I am nervously optimistic about a new, two-part Ken Burns documentary that debuts tonight called Jackie Robinson, purporting to take a look at the real man behind the legend. Here’s the promo:

Burns, a massively talented filmmaker, has long nurtured a twin obsession with baseball and race, which can tilt his output toward heavy-handedness mixed with nostalgia, but usually there’s more than enough journalism there to let the real story get through. I look forward to seeing how this one comes out.

Reason on Ken Burns here. After the jump, watch Nick Gillespie interview Burns about Prohibition:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1VizKiy
via IFTTT

Silver Soars, Stocks Slump As Equity “Fear” Hits All-Time Record High

"smooth sailing", right?

 

Something is going on beneath the covers…

Last week saw the biggest addition of shorts across the Treasury Bond Complex in over 3 years (with record ultra shorts)

 

And CSFB's "Fear Barometer" just hit an all-time high…

As CS' Mandy Xu notes, typically, an increase in the CSFB is caused by a combination of higher put demand and lower call demand. Interestingly, this time, the entire move was driven by the call-side. The derivatives market is assigning less than 1% probability the market will rise by 10% in the next three months vs. 17% probability it will fall by 10%.

*  *  *

And so while stocks tried (twice) to ramp in the face of faux-ness, they couldn't… Despite a well placed Italian headline into the close…

  • *ITALY FIN. INSTITUTIONS, CDP AGREE TO SET UP FUND FOR BANKS

Just as we predicted…

 

Which totally failed.. as stocks dumped into the red!

 

Who could have seen that coming? An EU banking bailout rumor headline-driven rally and USDJPY ramp crushed by crude's collapse on Russia "no freeze" headlines…

 

Post-Payrolls, stocks are red but crude is soaring with gold and bonds also bid…

 

But again all that mattered was 2043.94… (YTD unch) – VIX tagged 16.00 and was quickly dropped to get S&P back over 2043.94…

 

Goldman was bid on a $5.1bn settlement… (imagine if it had been $51 billion?)

 

Stocks are beginning to wake up to the credit and bond decoupling…

 

Treasury yields ended the day practically unchanged – swinging from bid to offered in the EU session and rallying (lower yields) during the US session…

 

The USD Index ended modestly lower on the day but rallied back during the US session (after the EU close) after some shenanigans around the Silver fix time…

 

And finally, Commodities all ended positively (even copper just) but it was silver that stood out…

 

As the precious metal inched back towards the $16 level…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

Bonus Chart: With Alcoa kicking off earning season, we suspect this won't end well…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1VObUKo Tyler Durden

For 6th Year Running, Economists’ Growth Expectations Collapse

With The Atlanta Fed's slashing its Q1 GDP growth expectations to just 0.1%, consensus estimates for 2016 growth have collapsed. However, none of this should surprise anyone as this is the sixth year in a row that over-optimistic growth hopes devolve into hype for more stimulus and a hockey-stick just around the corner.

 

While expectations have not improved since 2010, at least one these dreadful soothsayers is defending this year's drop in the same old manner – by promising that H2 will be better, for these 4 reasons…

Downward revisions to 1Q Atlanta Fed GDPNow: For the third year in a row, forecasters came into the first quarter looking for 2%-plus GDP growth, only to steadily revise estimates lower.

 

 

We look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracking for 1Q in each year. They are far from alone: both we and the consensus have been doing the same thing. This weakness adds to market skepticism about a June Fed hike. In both 2014 and 2015, we faded the weak 1Q data and argued that the recovery remained on track.

 

Today, we see four reasons to reiterate that call.

  • First, outside of the GDP adding up, the data look fine.
  • Second, some of the weakness is likely due to lingering seasonal adjustment problems.
  • Third, the fundamental backdrop points to moderate growth, not a big slowdown.
  • Fourth, and perhaps most important, with potential growth slipping below 2%, and given the normal variation in the data, we should not be surprised to see near-zero quarters on an annual basis.

Now where have we heard that before? It's different this year… i better be as whatever the 'authorities' are doing to save the world is not working. As Bloomberg's Richard Breslow notes, it is perhaps time, not extreme monetary policy action, that could be the cure…

All government policies, with the possible exception of those implemented through brute force, require a certain amount of trust and faith. For monetary policy this is particularly true. The theory is that if a central bank does one thing, lenders and borrowers will respond as expected. The much praised and maligned transmission mechanism.

 

Policy actions rapidly lose the ability to effect their purpose, or backfire, when financial market participants question the efficacy or indeed the sensibility of the prescriptions. It’s a lot more dangerous when those in charge of setting and implementing monetary strategy are among the disbelievers.

 

To be fair to bankers, (aren’t we always) one of the unfortunate consequences of the financial debacle has been an inexcusable and ongoing narrowing of how we define monetary policy. If you think of it as all policies that can affect the quantity and speed of the money supply, then there are many more choices than just benchmark rates and quantitative easing.

 

Tax reform and fiscal spending are among the tools that we’ve chosen to hold hostage rather than employ. The former on the grounds of partisan ideology and, I guess the latter, because governments are saving up for the next war.

 

Rates in Japan are less than zero, going well out the yield curve. The BOJ owns the bond market. How’s that working out for them? Europe has recessions and bank crises sprinkled all over the place. Both central banks want you to know they can still do more. To what point?

 

The IMF felt compelled yesterday to defend the concept of negative rates. Even they couldn’t muster more than, “we tentatively conclude that overall, they help deliver additional monetary stimulus.” By the way, they are expected to lower their global growth forecast yet again at this week’s meetings.

 

No one dares admit what negative rates will do to pensions, mortgages, savers and retirees. What they certainly won’t do is stoke animal spirits, lending and spending. They do prop up asset bubbles: as long as they never stop. I suspect the Fed worries a move to negative rates would be the last decision Congress would let them make.

 

The world is going to need the healing power of time, even if it means an extended period of low growth. It won’t be cured with extraordinary experimentation with the future.

Of course – that will not do for the short-termist equity wealth creation transmission channel.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Q3qHtS Tyler Durden