This Speed Camera Handed Out $77,550 Worth of Tickets in One Day

A speed camera on Ocean Avenue near a highway off-ramp and
Lincoln High School in Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn gave out 1,551
tickets one day earlier this year,
according
to the New York Post.

The information comes from a Department of Transportation report
that just got released. The big pay day came on July 7, when school
wasn’t even in session. Each ticket is $50, so the city snagged a
cool $77,550. It’s
one of 10
speed cameras on Ocean Parkway.

From the Post:

The area’s city councilman, Chaim Deutsch, praised it for making
roadways safer.

“If anyone is speeding . . . they deserve a summons,” he told
the blog Sheepshead Bites.

But Councilman Mark Treyger has blasted the camera’s location as
a speed trap.

Speed-camera violations are issued to anyone going more than
10 mph over the posted speed limit, which in this case is 30 mph.

“So someone slowing from 50 to 40 mph or from 45 to 35 would not
receive a violation,” a DOT spokesperson said.

The city is currently adding 120 new speed cameras near public
schools, expected to be in place by the end of 2015.

The agency said earlier this month that its 20 existing cameras
issued 183,000 tickets since January, netting about $9.2
million.

The local Sheepshead Bites blog
quotes
one resident who believes, “This camera seems to be
conveniently placed so close to the exit ramp that you are almost
guaranteed to set off this speed trap.”

Various analyses have poked holes in the idea that video
surveillance makes the roads safer.

A British study on speed cameras last year determined that “the
number of collisions appears to have risen enough to make the
cameras worthy of investigation in case they have contributed to
the increases.”

Likewise, many reports have indicated that red light cameras in
the U.S. increase
accidents

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/YHmKaZ
via IFTTT

Californians Seem Ready for More Sentencing Reform

Two years ago, by a
margin of more than 2 to 1, California voters
approved
Proposition 36, which reformed the state’s draconian
“three strikes” law by requiring that the offense triggering a
mandatory sentence of 25 years to life be “serious or violent.”
That initiative made about 3,000 prisoners eligible for
resentencing. Now Californians
seem
to be on the verge of approving
Proposition 47
, which would redefine certain low-level,
nonviolent felonies as misdemeanors. The initiative would have a
broader impact than Proposition 36, allowing some 10,000 inmates to
seek shorter sentences.

Proposition 47
covers
 simple drug possession, plus several property
crimes, including theft, shoplifiting, check forgery, and receiving
stolen property, when they involve a loss of $950 or less. The
maximum sentence for these offenses would be one year in jail. By
contrast, cocaine possession, if charged as a felony, currently can

result
in up to three years in prison. So can check kiting,
another “wobbler” that can be
treated
as a misdemeanor or a felony. Under Proposition 47,
check kiting would have to be charged as a misdemeanor if it
involves $950 or less, as opposed to the current limit of $450.

As The Drug War Chronicle‘s Phillip Smith
notes
, recent polling data bode well for passage of Proposition
47. A Field
Poll
conducted in June and July put support at 57 percent,
while a poll conducted this month by the Public Policy Institute of
California found that
62 percent of voters favored the measure. Like Proposition 36,
Proposition 47 boasts
support
from prominent law enforcement officials, including San
Francisco District Attorney George Gascón and former San Diego
Police Chief William Lansdowne. It promises to reduce the severe
overcrowding of California’s prisons and cut spending on
incarceration (although it earmarks the savings for a Safe
Neighborhoods and Schools Fund, which would turn the money over to
the Department of Education, the Victim Compensation and Government
Claims Board, and the Board of State and Community Correction).

Opponents
include the California District Attorneys Association
and the California Correctional Supervisors Association.

In a
column
earlier this month, Steven Greenhut looked forward to
passage of Proposition 47 as another sign that Californians are
reconsidering irrationally harsh criminal sentences. Further
evidence of that: Last night Gov. Jerry Brown
signed
 the California Fair Sentencing Act, which
eliminates
the sentencing disparity between the smoked and
snorted forms of cocaine.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1uWtVXy
via IFTTT

Can The US Economy Handle A Meaningful Downturn In Financial Asset Prices?

From ConvergEx‘ Nicholas Colas

Financial asset price volatility gets a bum rap.  Everything in moderation, yes…  But the unusually quiescent capital market behavior of the last few years isn’t really doing anyone any favors over the long run. Today’s note reviews the benefits of a more volatile bond and stock market: everything from the possibility for truly skilled fund managers to make outsized returns to a very necessary reset of investor and corporate behavior.  As bond and stock markets get twitchier  – and that process is already underway – just remember that there are many silver linings in the storm clouds that are gathering. 
 
For much of the history of modern medicine, the function of the human appendix has been a bit of a mystery and common wisdom held that it was essentially useless.  About the only thing doctors knew was that it could become infected and that its removal caused no adverse health consequences. Medical professionals have been performing appendectomies since the 1730s, and one brave Soviet doctor managed to remove his own infected appendix in the 1960s while stranded on a scientific outpost in Antarctica.  Don’t try that one at home, kids.
 
More recently, the appendix has gotten a reprieve and some researchers believe it may have several useful functions after all.  As it turns out, that little sac in your abdomen acts as a back-up supply for the bacteria your body needs to stay healthy. It also serves a function in prenatal development, helping to balance hormone levels. Clever surgeons now use the appendix to reconstruct internal organs damaged by cancer or infection. In short, the appendix does have its uses – plenty of them, actually.
 
For capital markets, asset price volatility is much like the human appendix. The rally in both stock and bond markets – especially in the U.S. – has come with little in the way of wayward price action. It has been a “Set it and forget it” move for stocks for three years, with little in the way of classic 10% pullbacks to shake out weaker hands.  The rally in bonds, thought unlikely at the beginning of the year, has been similarly uneventful. It is as if investors have extracted the seemingly unnecessary appendix of volatility and, with the market seemingly unaffected, decided it has no real function. 
 
The problem is that volatility is actually important to the proper functioning of capital markets. In fact, it is critical to both effective societal asset allocation and as a way to judge the skill of managers on Wall Street and Main Street alike. It isn’t just price levels that define capitalism; it is the correlated spectrums of risk and return from sure bets to highly speculative ventures that keeps the machine running smoothly. The journey really is just as important as the destination. 
 
That may come as an unwelcome message to those accustomed to steadily positive returns over the last 5 years. For many investors, the 90% advance in the S&P 500 or the 86% return in the Russell 2000 have been a welcome salve after the burns of 2007-2008. All that has come with very low levels of both actual and expected price volatility, as expressed by measures like the CBOE VIX Index. Since rising volatility tends to drive asset prices lower, what will the harvest be when stocks finally do start to act more like their crankier old selves?
 
Spoiler alert (sort of): stock price volatility is rising, and October is historically a seasonal high water mark for zippy price movements. Hundred-plus point moves in the Dow now come regularly, and the CBOE VIX Index is up from 12 to 15 in the last month. In short, stock volatility is back and it wants to know why we changed the locks and threw all its clothes on the front lawn. 
 
And yet… There are several silver linings shot through those incoming storm clouds. Consider the following points:

  • Imagine you are a public company Chief Financial Officer and you must explain your cost of capital to the rest of the organization and your Board of Directors. This is a tough concept for non-financial professionals, and they tend to look at the stock price as a way to shortcut the tedious math behind the calculation. High stock price equals “Things are going great!  Expand the business. Buy other companies. Grow, baby, grow.” 

    Price volatility is what keeps those animal spirits in check and forces corporate Main Street to watch their pennies. Now, the last five years haven’t exactly been a rapper’s birthday party of corporate spending, so incremental stock price volatility isn’t just about keeping the lid on profligacy.  Rather, it will be a warning shot to keep corporate America focused on the very best expansion projects and overall asset mix. And that’s always a good thing for investors and society as a whole.

  • Then there’s the Wall Street side of the volatility equation. The last five years have been a boon to passive investing – why buy the active manager cow when you can get the milk of high returns for (almost) free? The recent news that the California Public Employees Retirement System plans to scale back their exposure to hedge funds is just one touchstone in that trend. So is the persistent move of capital from actively managed mutual funds to overwhelmingly passive exchange traded products.

    It’s all funds (sic) and games until someone loses an eye, as every parent warns.  Price volatility will allow active managers to feel some sunlight after the long eclipse of the last half decade. Truly skillful managers – long only or hedge fund, it matters not – welcome volatility since it allows them to find the babies mixed in with the bathwater.

  • Economic volatility, to the degree it comes with asset price moves, also plays a productive if short-term painful role in capitalism. Consider that the times when the CBOE VIX Index ran consistently below its long run average of 20 (14.9 as of Friday) are all periods of bad capital allocation. The mid-1990s sewed the seeds of the dot com bubble. A decade later, the same VIX levels travelled hand in hand with the housing bubble and the setup for the Financial Crisis.  Low volatility and poor societal capital investment share a room in the orphanage of failure. 

The key question now is “Can the U.S./global economy handle a meaningful downturn in financial asset prices?” The short answer is that it may not have a choice. The Federal Reserve has done what it can to juice the American economy and has the balance sheet to prove it. Central banks, for all their power, do not control long term capital allocation or corporate hiring practices.  Fed Funds have been below 2% for six years.  If the U.S. economy can’t continue to grow in 2015 as the Federal Reserve inches rates higher, there are clearly larger issues at play.  And those private sector problems will need private sector solutions. 
 
In short, higher asset price volatility from current levels isn’t something to fear if you consider its function over the long run.  A little pain now will save a lot of trouble later. 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1uW8XYQ Tyler Durden

USDJPY Surge Drags Nasdaq Green, Bonds Ain't Buying It (Again)

The Nasdaq, Russell 2000, and Dow Transports have been rescued in their high-beta manner all the way back to green by an initial USDJPY ramp to ignite some momentum "off the lows". Treasuries and credit refuse to  play along and even USDJPY has decoupled as stocks surged on a VIX-slamming (from over 17 to 15.50) ramp to unch. Safe-haven buying of camera-on-a-stick continues (+8% today).

Back to green…

 

With camera-on-a-stick squeezing ever higher…

 

On a sea of USDJPY rampage…

 

and VIX-slamming (from over 17 at the open)

 

But bonds ain't buying it…

 

Charts: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rFcn3D Tyler Durden

USDJPY Surge Drags Nasdaq Green, Bonds Ain’t Buying It (Again)

The Nasdaq, Russell 2000, and Dow Transports have been rescued in their high-beta manner all the way back to green by an initial USDJPY ramp to ignite some momentum "off the lows". Treasuries and credit refuse to  play along and even USDJPY has decoupled as stocks surged on a VIX-slamming (from over 17 to 15.50) ramp to unch. Safe-haven buying of camera-on-a-stick continues (+8% today).

Back to green…

 

With camera-on-a-stick squeezing ever higher…

 

On a sea of USDJPY rampage…

 

and VIX-slamming (from over 17 at the open)

 

But bonds ain't buying it…

 

Charts: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rFcn3D Tyler Durden

Russian Stocks Enter Bear Market As Ruble Hits Record Low

Russia’s RTS Index has dropped over 20% from its post-Sanctions 1.0 highs in June, officially entering a bear market. The Ruble continues to slide, breaking above 39.50 against the USD – record weakness. Whether it is US/EU sanctions “costs” and/or merely EM risk-off hot money outflows is unclear, but what is clear is that Russian stocks are extremely cheap…

 

 

Chart: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rFcmN3 Tyler Durden

Will Senators Rand Paul and Elizabeth Warren Unite to Finally “Audit the Fed”?

Screen Shot 2014-09-29 at 12.09.59 PMI finally had a chance to listen to the hour long interview of former bank examiner and whistleblower, Carmen Segarra, with “This American Life.” In the event you haven’t taken the time to listen for yourself, I can’t emphasize enough how important it is that you do.

Whether you listen to it yourself or not, I think it’s worthwhile to share what I believe are the most important takeaways from the “Goldman Tapes,” since you cannot solve a problem unless you understand it clearly at its core. First, a little background. Carmen Segarra is the woman who worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as a bank examiner. She was assigned specifically to Goldman Sachs, and was ultimately fired for asking too many questions. These employees are positioned within certain banks in order to oversee them and alert bosses about any unscrupulous activities. At least that is what is claimed.


Protect your wealth – Buy Gold and Silver Bullion with Goldbroker.com


continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1qOEyrq
via IFTTT

Stupid Bureaucracy Prevents Licensing of New Doctors in Arizona

DoctorsIn the
course of their absolute obsession with running everybody who wants
to work through a bureaucratic gauntlet, Arizona lawmakers passed
SB1380,
requiring physicians to submit fingerprints as part of the process
of undergoing criminal background checks. As annoying as that is,
it also worsened the burden on the Arizona Medical Board, which already had
a backlog of license applications it couldn’t handle. So, the board
responded by
freezing license applications two weeks ago
:

Recently, circumstances beyond the control of the Arizona
Medical Board have caused a delay in the implementation of the
federal background check requirement.

As a result, there will be a temporary delay in the Board’s
ability to issue licenses to new applicants.

Existing licensees will continue to practice without
interruption, provided that the renewal application was filed
timely and any requests for additional information are met. Please
note that a delay in the actual issuance of the license renewal
will occur.

This means a temporary (we assume) freeze on additions to the
already thin ranks of physicians serving a state that’s been

fretting about a doctors’ shortage
for years. The crunch is
anticipated to
get worse
, largely because of Medicaid expansion increasing
demand without providing much of an incentive (at the program’s
level of compensation) for supply to match. Freezing the issuance
of medical licenses makes expanding the supply of medical
providers…a tad more challenging.

“Unfortunately,” notes the Arizona Medical Association in its
weekly email update, “for physicians wanting to apply for a license
in AZ, the immediate future is unknown at best and at a standstill
at worst. This has serious repercussions for any practices and
hospitals involved in hiring these applicants, and also for the
ability to attract more physician talent into Arizona.”

Undoubtedly, state officials will eventually untangle the
problem that they created. Maybe they need to put a few more rules
in place.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1oqJcfJ
via IFTTT

Americans Split Pretty Evenly on Proper Role of Government

The latest poll from Gallup Politics looks
at
how Americans view the proper role of govenment
. Though it
might come as a surprise to anyone watching U.S. politics, about an
equal number claim to prefer a government that provides “only the
most basic” functions as favor a government that “takes active
steps in every area it can to try and improve the lives of its
citizens.” 

For the poll, conducted earlier this month, respondents were
asked to rate themselves on a 5-point scale with “1” corresponding
to the limited-government perspective and “5” signalling support
for an activist government. About 35 percent rated themselves as
“1” or “2”, meaning they would prefer government play a minimal
role in the lives of citizens. Slightly less (32 percent) chose “4”
or “5”, indicating a preference to turn over control of their lives
to the state. The remaining third of respondents favored a middle
ground. This is the fourth time Gallup has asked this particular
polling question (starting in 2010) and all four polls have
featured a relatively even split. 

Unsurprisingly, Democrats were more likely to favor ample
government than Republicans—though there was plenty of partisan
crossover. About 17 percent of Republican respondents slotted
themselves in the pro-big government camp, and 10 percent of
Democrats said they support a more limited government. Meanwhile
about a quarter of Republicans and 38 percent of Democrats rated
themselves in the middle of the government-scope scale. 

Gallup also asked respondents whether they thought government
was currently doing too much or not enough. More than half
(54 percent) said it’s “trying to do too many things that should be
left to individuals and businesses” while 41 percent said the
government needs to “do more to solve our country’s problems.”

Of limited-government fans from question one, 86 percent think
the government is currently too hands-on, with those neutral on
question one also tending to lean this way. However, when it comes
to big-government supporters, a terrifying 74 percent thinks
government isn’t active enough in our lives right now and should be
doing more.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1oqJbby
via IFTTT

Albuquerque Cop Caught on Dash Cam Saying He’d Shoot "Fucking Lunatic" in the Penis Hours Before Cops Fatally Shoot the Homeless Camper

James Boyd shootingOne of the objections police officers bring up to
continuously operating body and dash cams is that during their
shifts they should have some expectation of privacy when they’re
not engaging residents. It’s why body and dash cams almost
universally have on-off switches accessible to the officers using
them.

The use of body cams can focus attention on questionable acts by
police officers. Earlier this year in Albuquerque, N.M., for
example, the shooting of homeless camper James Boyd was caught on a
cop’s helmet video,
sparking protests across the state
and bringing needed
attention to the Albuquerque Police Department’s history of police
brutality and fatal shootings.

Now dash cam video from a State Trooper’s patrol car was found
to have caught a conversation with one of the officers involved in
the James Boyd shooting, Keith Sandy.

The relevant portion of the transcript,
via KOB4 in Albuquerque
:

Sandy: What do they have you guys doing here?

Ware: I don’t know. The guy asked for state police.

Sandy: Who asked?

Ware: I don’t know.

Sandy: For this f***ing lunatic?  I’m going to shoot him in
the penis with a shotgun here in a second.

Ware: You got uh less-lethal?

Sandy: I got…

Ware: The Taser shotgun?

Sandy: Yeah.

Ware: Oh, I thought you guys got rid of those?

Sandy: ROP’s got one…here’s what we’re thinking, because I
don’t know what’s going on, nobody has briefed me…

In an internal interview, Sandy excused the comment as “locker
room banter” and a “joke.” Understandably the lawyer for James
Boyd’s family, doesn’t see it that way. “It’s chilling evidence and
stunning that he has not been criminally indicted,” Shannon Kennedy
told KOB4. “He says to a state police officer ‘that f’ing
lunatic, I’m going to shoot him in the penis.’  It’s crystal
clear and he says it with contempt in his voice.” 

Neither Sandy nor any other officer involved in the Boyd
shooting have been indicted, and remain on paid administrative lead
while an investigation
continues to come to a conclusion
.

Based on an investigation started in November 2012, this April
the Department of Justice (DOJ)
found
“reasonable cause to believe that the Albuquerque Police
Department is engaged in a pattern or practice of use of excessive
force, including the use of unreasonable deadly force.” The DOJ,
Albuquerque, and the APD are now working on setting up federal
monitorship of the department.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1oqJ8wd
via IFTTT