Politicians For Sale? There’s An App For That

We have not been shy about exposing the dark shadowy under-belly of lobbyists funding politicians (as most recently noted with Cantor’s catastrophe) but now, as Engadget reports, finding out which representatives are in the pocket without a lot of tedious research just got a lot easier. A 16-year-old programmer has developed a browser plugin – Greenhouse – that, when you mouse-over the name of a US lawmaker, will serve up a list of which parties have donated to their campaign funds, and the quantities. Better than flappy-birds?

 

 

Read more from Engadget here

Visit The Greenhouse app page here

And here is the 16-year-old programmer’s credo:

It is my hope that providing increased transparency around the amount and source of funding of our elected representatives may play a small role in educating citizens and promoting change. If you use the extension when reading about a Congressional vote on energy policy, for example, maybe you’ll discover that a sponsor of a bill has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the oil and gas industry. Or maybe you’ll learn that the top donors to a member of Congress who opposes tort reform are lawyers and law firms. I use data from the last full election cycle (generally 2011-12 for Representatives and 2007-12 for Senators) and plan to update it as more relevant data becomes available. Special thanks to OpenSecrets.org for providing access to that data.

 

The motto of Greenhouse is: “Some are red. Some are blue. All are green.” What it signifies is that the influence of money on our government isn’t a partisan issue. Whether Democrat or Republican, we should all want a political system that is independent of the influence of big money and not dependent on endless cycles of fundraising from special interests. The United States of America was founded to serve individuals, not big interests or big industries. Yet every year we seem to move farther and farther away from our Founders’ vision.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1mauC9f Tyler Durden

What If They Passed a Law to Reform Police Misconduct and the DOJ Ignored It?

PoliceWhat if, a long time ago, the federal
government noticed many of the problematic and abusive police
practices
about which we complain today—practices including
excessive force, discriminatory harassment, false arrest, coercive
sexual conduct, and unlawful stops. In response, the federal
government passed a law to rein in such abuses, and assigned the
Justice Department to keep police departments around the country on
the straight and narrow. Then everybody patted themselves on the
back and…business as usual

That’s what Stephen Rushin, a law professor at the University of
Illinois, says happened with Law Enforcement Misconduct Statute
42
U.S.C. § 14141
, passed in 1994. This law, according to the
Department of Justice
:

allows us to review the practices of law enforcement agencies
that may be violating people’s federal rights. If a law enforcement
agency receives federal funding, we can also use the
anti-discrimination provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Streets Act of 1968, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964,,,

The problems addressed in our cases include use of excessive
force; unlawful stops, searches, or arrests; and discriminatory
policing. We have looked at bias based on race, ethnicity, national
origin, gender, and sexual-orientation. We have also addressed
unlawful responses to individuals who observe, record, or object to
police actions.

But a funny thing happened on the way to enforcing the
law—basically, it wasn’t. In “Federal
Enforcement of Police Reform
” a paper published in the
Fordham Law Review few weeks ago, Rushin argues that the
law has been used in some high-profile cases in Cincinnati, Los
Angeles, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Washington, D.C., but
that’s just a tiny subset of possible applications.

“Historically, the federal government has only initiated an
average of three formal investigations under Section 14141 per
year,”
he says
. “And the DOJ has only pursued full-scale reform
against an average of about one department per year. There are
around 18,000 police departments in the U.S.”

So scale is part of it; Rushin thinks the Justice Department
just doesn’t have the resources to monitor all the law enforcement
agencies in the country. He suggests giving private parties “a
limited equitable right of action to initiate structural police
reform”—basically, the ability to sue police departments into
changing their ways (individuals who bring such suits now must
demonstrate the department was “deliberately indifferent in its
failure to train or supervise an employee.”)

Rushin also sees a lack of internal will at the Justice
Department to go after abusive police departments, Internal
policies and leadership often deemphasize police misconduct as a
priority. And he sees top-down political pressures having an
impact, too.

“Fighting police misconduct at the federal level is politically
contentious. As my evidence shows, during the Clinton
administration and Obama administration, the DOJ took on an
aggressive posture in fighting police misconduct. During the second
half of the Bush administration, they were generally uninterested
in using the statute.”

Anybody subject to the tender ministrations of federal law
enforcement agencies in recent years might wonder how much of a
priority reining in the ranks is for the current administration or
was during the Clinton years. But perhaps that’s a battle that
needs to be fought separately from reform of state and local
agencies.

Aside from allowing for private litigation, Rushin’s solutions
are a litte vague: greater transparency and “alternative routes to
increase the number of structural police reform cases.” How those
alternative routes would be shielded from the political pressures
that have hobbbled the 1994 law is anybody’s guess.

Because, for sure, the once much-ballyhooed 20-year-old effort
to address police misconduct
doesn’t seem to have had all that much impact at all.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1lMMTO7
via IFTTT

A.M. Links: New NSA Leak ‘Imminent’ from Snowden, V.A. Scandal Grows, Iraq Falls Apart

  • IRS chief John Koskinen faced sharp questioning on Capitol Hill
    yesterday over the Lois Lerner email scandal. “We have a problem
    with you and you have a problem with credibility,”
    declared
    House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa
    (R-Calif.).
  • ISIS fighters claim to have seized
    control
    of Iraq’s largest oil refinery.
  • According to a whistle-blower, Veterans Affairs officials in
    Phoenix conspired to
    cover up the deaths
    of at least seven veterans who died before
    receiving care. “My hands were tied. I tried to scream, and did the
    best with what I had. But the vets who were upset and deceased—I
    can’t shake that feeling,” V.A. scheduling clerk Pauline DeWenter

    told
    The Arizona Republic.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on
Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You
can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up
here
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jcUO33
via IFTTT

Jacob Sullum on Why ‘You Can Never Drive’

BellaLagoWashington’s five-nanogram rule, modeled after
the per se standard for alcohol, was meant to reassure voters
worried about the threat posed by stoned drivers. But like all per
se standards, it treats some people as unsafe to drive even when
they’re not, writes Jacob Sullum. Last year experiments by KIRO,
the CBS station in Seattle, and KDVR, the Fox affiliate in Denver,
showed that regular cannabis consumers can perform competently on
driving courses and simulators at THC levels far above five
nanograms.

The lack of correspondence between the new standard and
impairment is especially unfair to medical marijuana users, some of
whom may be above the five-nanogram limit all the time, meaning
they are never legally allowed to drive in Washington.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jcUNMG
via IFTTT

Ed Krayewski on How Iraq Could Become a Terror Threat to the U.S.

One of the
arguments deployed for continued U.S. involvement in Iraq is that
the rise of jihadist groups like the Islamic State in Iraq and
Syria (ISIS) in the region will lead to more terrorism directed at
the United States. “The seeds of 9/11s are being planted all over
Iraq and Syria,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned last
week. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) noted this weekend, the
blame for the current instability in the Middle East could be
placed on the disastrous Iraq War waged by the U.S. in the last
decade. Indeed, U.S. interventions across the wider region have
helped Al Qaeda-linked groups like ISIS set up base. Yet,
insofar as the terrorist threat to America is real, writes Ed
Krayewski, U.S. intervention to date has helped to create the
conditions on the ground to incubate such a threat.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jcUNwf
via IFTTT

Brickbat: Keep Away

While doing research for
a class debate on gun control, Andrew Lampart found he couldn’t
access the National Rifle Association’s website while on campus at
Connecticut’s Nonnewaug High School. But he could go to pro-gun
control sites just fine. Investigating further, he found the state
Republican Party’s website was blocked,
but not that of the Democratic Party. Anti-abortion websites were
blocked, but not those of pro-choice groups. Christian websites,
including that of the Vatican, were blocked, but not Islamic
websites. He complained to the superintendent, but nothing changed.
So he took his findings to the school board. “The board appreciated
hearing the comments from Andrew and agree that he has raised an
important issue that warrants further investigation,” said board
John Chapman.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jcUNw3
via IFTTT

Case-Shiller Index Has Slowest Annual Home Price Increase In A Year

There is a reason why Case-Shiller titled its summary presentation of the April housing market based on its 20-City Composite index “Rate of Home Price Gains Drop Sharply.” The reason is simple: in April the housing market, while still preserving some upward momentum, appears to stumbled severely in April, with the Y/Y increase in the 20-City composite rising “only” 10.8%, down from 12.37% the month before, and the lowest annual increase since April of 2013. And this time there is no snow to blame it on.

The disappointing print certainly took economists by surprise, who were expecting a 11.5% increase, meaning this was the biggest miss since March 2013.

And while we ignore the Seasonally Adjusted data, as Case-Shiller suggests we do, the monthly increase here pretty much explained what is going on: at a 0.19% sequential rate of increase, this was far below the 0.8% expected rise (down from 1.25% the month before), and is the lowest print since March 2012. At this pace, May home prices may even indicate a sequential decline. As a reminder, the last time we transitioned from rising hone prices to declining prices per Case Shiller was May 2010!.

From the report:

“Although home prices rose in April, the annual gains weakened,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “Overall, prices are rising month-to-month but at a slower rate. Last year some Sunbelt cities were seeing year-over-year numbers close to 30%, now all are below 20%: Las Vegas (18.8%), Los Angeles (14.0%), Phoenix (9.8%), San Diego (15.3%) and San Francisco (18.2%). Other cities around the nation are also experiencing slower price increases.

 

“While the annual numbers worsened, the monthly figures were seasonally strong. Five cities – Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco and Seattle – reported monthly gains of 2% or more. Dallas and Denver gained 1.6% and continue to set new peaks. Boston and Charlotte are less than 10% away from their peaks.

The punchline, and where this all feeds into the Fed’s monetary policy plans:

“Near term economic factors favor further gains in housing: mortgage rates are lower than a year ago, the Fed is expected to keep interest rates steady until mid-2015 and the labor market is improving. However, housing is not back to normal: prices are being supported by cash sales, low inventories and declining foreclosure and REO sales. First time home buyers are not back in force and qualifying for a mortgage remains challenging. The question is whether housing will bounce back before the Fed begins to tighten sometime next year.”

The answer, clearly, is no. And since housing, via the securitization pathway, is still not the private sector equivalent of “High Quality Collateral” it means that without a shadow of a doubt, the Fed will have to come back and resume monetizing debt some time in the next 6-12 months, even after it ends its current tapering phase.

Source: Case-Shiller




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pxPv2e Tyler Durden

Meet “Osama Bin Bieber”: ISIS’ Latest Recruit

It has long been the case that Jihadist Al-Qaeda groups tend to find the occasional odd, western groupie, but probably never before has there been a case as peculiar as that of 18-year-old Mohammad Hadi, from the city of Coventry, who as Al Arabiya reports, is believed to have joined the infamous and brutal Islamic militant group which is causing nightmares for the US state department, the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant aka ISIS.

Meet Osama Bin Bieber.

According to Al Arabiya, the young man, of Iraqi-Kurdish descent, is nicknamed ‘Osama Bin Bieber’ after Canadian pop star Justin Bieber due to his young appearance.

Hadi claims that extremist clerics at a religious school in the city had radicalized him and persuaded him to travel to the Middle East, alongside three other men.

 

There are Instagram pictures, posted by Hadi, that show him holding guns and tweets claiming that he is in Syria with ‘Dawla’, another name for ISIS.

 

Back in March, Hadi’s parents had supposedly reported missing charges on him to the police. In addition, the police had been warned before about his growing extremist outlook.

 

On Sunday, The Sun had spoken to Mohammad’s father, Mahir Hadi, 38, who said “We can’t talk about it – I don’t know anything about it. The police know better than me.”

 

Users on Twitter have reported that Hadi, now with the alias Abu Yahya Al Kurdy, is currently with a group of Chechens near the Syrian town of Sarrin.

As the mail added, twitter users have reported Hadi, also known as Abu Yahya Al Kurdy, was near the northern Syrian town of Sarrin earlier this month, with a group of Chechens.

A Coventry local said he saw the teenager’s father in tears after discovering what he had done.

“He was so frightened that he would die out there and was furious…”

An imam at the madrassa said Hadi did attend but when he discovered his plans to travel to the strife-hit region he called West Midlands Police.

A spokesman for police said it was investigating his whereabouts.

The news about Hadi comes soon after two Britons and an Australian were seen in an ISIL recruitment video urging other British Islamists to join their ”holy war”.

It remains to be seen if ISIS adds “Bieberesque” singing to its arsenal of weapons banned by the Geneva convention.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1itirJX Tyler Durden

Germany Still Wants Gold Back – Repatriation Campaign Continues Read more at http://ift.tt/1miyjOU

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,323, EUR 971.44 and GBP 778.51 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,313.50, EUR 967.02 and GBP 771.51 per ounce.

Gold rose $3 or 0.2% yesterday to $1,317.50 per ounce and silver rose 2 cents to $20.88 per ounce.


A journalist holds a gold ingot next to a security officer of the German Central Bank, right, in Frankfurt, Germany, Wednesday January 16, 2013

Gold climbed to a two-month high over $1,324/oz in London this morning as tension in Iraq led to a safe haven bid and consolidation over the $1,300/oz level. European stocks dropped to a one-week low as German business confidence fell to the lowest level this year and on concerns about geopolitical risk.

Gold futures trading volume was 11% below the average for the past 100 days for this time of day, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Sunni militants, with powerful backing, have consolidated their hold over swathes of Iraq, OPEC’s second-biggest oil producer, after two weeks of fighting. The U.S. said Iraq faces an existential threat and sent Secretary of State John Kerry to the north of Iraq. He is said to be trying to persuade Iraqi leaders to form a more inclusive government.

In Ukraine, militants were shooting overnight in Starobilsk which did not result in casualties. Pro-Russian rebels in the east of the country had earlier called a cease-fire in fighting against government forces, matching a truce announcement made three days earlier by President Petro Poroshenko.

Gold bullion climbed 3% last week as the Federal Reserve said it will keep interest rates at almost zero for a considerable time and geopolitical risk intensified.

Gold is 6% higher so far in June and is set for the first back-to-back quarterly gain since 2011, partly as violence in Iraq and tension in Ukraine spurred demand for a haven.

Technically, gold looks positive and is trading above key moving averages again and appears to have broken out. A close above $1,400/oz will be very bullish and embolden the bulls to re-enter the market.


Gold in USD, 2 Year Daily – (Thomson Reuters)

Silver for immediate delivery added another 0.4% to $20.974 an ounce in London, and earlier reached $21.0328, the highest since March 18. Platinum rose 0.5% to $1,463.38 an ounce. Palladium gained 0.7% to $827.76 an ounce.

Platinum and palladium rose again as producers moved closer to signing a deal to end a mine strike in South Africa. The three largest platinum companies and the main union at their South African mines will today sign a deal to end a crippling five-month strike after the labour group’s members accepted pay proposals from producers. The stoppage by at least 70,000 miners cost the companies 23.9 billion rand billion in revenue and reduced supplies. South Africa is the biggest supplier of platinum and the second-largest for palladium.

Both the physical platinum and palladium markets facing sizable deficits this year after the lengthy production stoppage in South Africa. This will support prices and should economic war with Russia deepen then we should see some real fireworks in the PGM markets that propel prices back to record highs.

Germany Still Wants Gold Back – Repatriation Campaign Continues
More than 18 months ago, on January 16, 2013 Germany’s central bank, the Bundesbank, announced that it will repatriate to Germany all 374 tonnes it had stored with the Banque de France in Paris, as well as 300 tonnes held in Manhattan by the New York Federal Reserve, by 2020.

Despite a lag of 18 months, the Bundesbank, as the Federal Bank of Germany is often called, has only managed to bring home a tiny 37 tonnes of gold.

A paltry 5 tonnes of that came from the U.S., the rest from Paris. The US Fed holds 45% or roughly $635 billion of the total 3,396 tonnes of gold Germany have in reserve, the world’s second largest gold reserves.

This has prompted, not surprisingly, renewed questions whether Germany’s gold still exists in those Manhattan vaults or if it has been melted down, leased or even sold.

With doubts about the whereabouts of Germany’s gold still prevalent, it appears that either Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition or the ECB, has decided to attempt to put the matter to rest.

Bloomberg reported yesterday that the German campaign to repatriate German gold from the U.S. has ended. The Bloomberg story was headlined ‘German Gold Stays in New York in Rebuff to Euro Doubters’ and the first sentence was ‘Germany has decided its gold is safe in American hands’.

However, the leader of the German gold repatriation movement, “Repatriate our Gold,” Peter Boehringer immediately refuted the Bloomberg article and posted in the comment section at the bottom of the Bloomberg article:

Just to set the record straight re this article in which my name is mentioned and in which I am quoted out of context:
a) Bloomberg uncritically cites statements of politicians and BuBa-bankers who have or give no proof whatsoever re the untouched whereabouts of the german Gold.

b) Re our campaign “Repatriate our Gold” “On hold” does of course NOT mean that we are in any way satisfied with the current status of BuBa´s ongoing repatriation (far too slow and too little – only 5 tons came from NY in 2013! Not exactly a proof for the untouched existence of 1500 tons in a NY vault unaudited since 1950…). Our public campaign will therefore have to continue.

c) Almost no info in the article can be considered in any way “news”. Simply because there has not been any material news in this context since early 2013.

d) Especially the headline is plainly false, because there has not been any change in BuBa´s (too slow) repatriation plans: at least 300+ tonnes will come from NY by end 2020. It is not much – but contrary to the headline, BuBa has NOT stopped the ongoing partial repatriation – enforced solely by public pressure!

e) The political party “Alternative for Germany” has never been part of our campaign – they can therefore not have been “rebuffed” as the article suggests.

f) The political party “FDP” has (with the exception of one (1) MP ) never demanded a repatriation – yet another false info in the article.

g) Some politicians cited in the article cannot in any way claim to be “in charge” of the german gold hoard (abroad or not). This holds true for both Mr Barthle and for Mr Hardt: BuBa alone is in charge – and officially, BuBa is independent from political influence…

Summary: a “non-news” article with a wrong headline, strange interviewees, old news, and with a clearly apologetic ideological approach: the main purpose seems to be NOT to give space to the myriad of unanswered and extremely relevant questions BuBa and the Fed have been refusing to answer for decades. Please read more at “Repatriate our Gold.”

See article and comments here: ‘German Gold Stays in New York in Rebuff to Euro Doubters’

The Bundesbank’s move to repatriate 674 tonnes of the German gold reserves from Paris and New York to Frankfurt in January 2013 was a victory for openness, transparency and for those who have campaigned for transparency in the gold market for years.

The move by the Bundesbank to be more transparent about the location of gold reserves was welcomed by many market participants as most believe that central banks should have to disclose simple facts about their gold reserves – such as their quantity, where they are held, whether they have been lent or swapped, and so forth.

The fact that the Bundesbank had been nudged into new-found transparency was a victory for the groups of investors – most prominent among them, the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee or GATA – that have for years been asking central banks to reveal their holdings and activities in the gold market.

Those who have dismissed the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee or GATA as “conspiracy theorists” have yet to acknowledge or refute the voluminous documentation and evidence that GATA have amassed over the years.

GATA have long made a strong case that certain banks may have been manipulating gold and silver prices lower. In the same way that banks have been proven to conspire in rigging LIBOR, interest rates and foreign exchange markets.

The campaign to achieve a free market in gold and silver prices will continue.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pxDnhB GoldCore