$3.5 million new bus barn idea wheeled out to BoE

A proposal made Monday to the Fayette County Board of Education could lead to a new location for the school system’s transportation department and the facility used to store and maintain school buses. The school board voted 4-1 to have the project designed and returned for a possible vote to proceed.

The bus shop, sometimes called the bus barn, and the school system’s transportation department building are located behind the school board headquarters on Stonewall Avenue in Fayetteville.

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1baYT42

BoE recognizes Fayette’s Counselors of the Year

The Fayette County School System “Counselors of the Year” were recognized Monday by the Fayette County Board of Education. Pictured, from left, are High School Coach of the Year Lakisha Bonner, Fayette County School System Pupil Personnel Services Director Barbara Serapion, Elementary School Counselor of the Year Leslie Fear, Middle School counselor of the Year Kristin Cristelli and Advocate of the Year Mike Conway, pastor of Heritage Christian Church. Photo/Ben Nelms.

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1baYSNx

F’ville man, 21, charged with rape, sodomy of Riverdale woman, 19

A Fayetteville man has been charged with rape and aggravated sodomy in a Jan. 20 incident involving a 19-year-old Riverdale woman.

Herminio Gutierrez, 21, of Booker Avenue, was charged with rape, aggravated sodomy, making terroristic threats and acts and misdemeanor battery, according to Fayetteville Det. Mike Whitlow.

Whitlow said the incident occurred in the early morning hours of Jan. 20 after Gutierrez and the woman returned from a date in Atlanta and went to his residence.

“He became sexually aggressive and she rebuffed him,” Whitlow said.

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1baYPRR

ID thieves stole customer info, counterfeited personal checks

A Fairburn woman and a Jonesboro man have been charged on multiple counts of financial identity theft involving Fayette County victims.

Catraya Vogt, 29, of Fairburn, was charged with 15 counts of identity theft. Her accomplice, 28-year-old Douglas Allen, of Jonesboro, was also charged with 15 counts of identity theft, according to Sheriff Barry Babb.

Babb said between November 2012 and January 2014, the Fayette County Sheriff’s Office investigated over 30 identity theft transactions with a similar modus operandi.

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1baYQ8h

Chase ends in arrest of Molena man, 24

A Molena man was arrested Jan. 27 after a car chase in north Fayette and Fulton counties.

Twenty-four-year-old Thomas Moore was charged with DUI and driving on a suspended license, according to Sheriff Barry Babb.

Babb said deputies in the early morning hours of Jan. 27 conducted a traffic stop near the Fayette County and Fulton County border.

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1fqNHVj

Restrictionists Going Nuts Over Immigration Reform, Again.

The House GOP, it appears, is finally getting serious about
doing something
lame
(as Ed Krayewski
explained
this morning) to reform our
inhumane and irrational
immigration system. So, naturally,
restrictionists have started spilling vast quantities of fake bile
and warning GOP leaders of dire consequences if they don’t cease
and desist.

The peerless (thank god) Ann Coulter got the ball rolling.
She didn’t take the tack of Republican
“pussies”
who limit their opposition to illegal immigration. No
siree. She wants a war on all immigrants – even the good, high
skilled variety – lest they ruin America forever. How? By voting
against Republicans. “Immigrants — all immigrants — have always
been the bulwark of the Democratic Party,” she harrumphs.

Setting aside the fact that 45-plus percent of Hispanics voted
for George W. Bush, what’s bad for Republicans is ipso facto bad
for America? Got it.

Famous nativist and Zullu-basher
Pat Buchanan
chimed
in on Laura Ingraham’s radio show that House Speaker
John Boehner would sing his “last hurrah” if he pushed for reform.
“You will have a war inside the Republican party — a Balkan war —
this year,” he snorted.

So the way for Republicans to maintain peace is by continuing a
war on immigrants? Got that too.

Implacable immigration foe Sen. Jeff Sessions
accused
the House’s leadership of – horror of horrors! –
consulting with “Democrat activists” before their own
obstructionist members in their  “rush to pass an immigration
bill.”

 Rush.

A reform effort that has been in the works since at least 2006
(when George W. Bush first proposed) is a rush job? The good
senator obviously has a watch in geological time. But,
whatever.

Meanwhile, the National Review
predictably
declared any reform effort that did not first erect
a Berlin Wall on the Rio Grande as a “fraud” on the American
people.

Less predictably, however, the Weekly Standard, which
used to once have sensible views on immigration, seconded that
sentiment
claiming
that reformers were playing “skeptics for fools” by
even considering any form of legalization before the borders are
sealed.

Such pre-emptive biliousness against reforms has worked well for
restrictionists in the past. But how long can they go on without
getting acid reflux?

My pieces on how Republicans can stay the party of limited
government and still win minorities a la Canada’s Tory Party

here
and
here
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nroDRZ
via IFTTT

Todd says this is his last year on BoE

Fayette County Board of Education member Bob Todd, an educator since 1958 and on the school board for 12 years, is calling it quits after this year.

Todd at the Monday school board meeting announced that he will not qualify for another term for his Post 4 seat.

“Fifty-six years ago I entered Thomson High School as a freshman teacher. My journey in public education has been truly remarkable,” Todd said at the beginning of his brief remarks Monday night. ”My term with public education will end on Dec. 31.”

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1bai1C4

Todd says this is his last year on BoE

Fayette County Board of Education member Bob Todd, an educator since 1958 and on the school board for 12 years, is calling it quits after this year.

Todd at the Monday school board meeting announced that he will not qualify for another term for his Post 4 seat.

“Fifty-six years ago I entered Thomson High School as a freshman teacher. My journey in public education has been truly remarkable,” Todd said at the beginning of his brief remarks Monday night. ”My term with public education will end on Dec. 31.”

read more

via The Citizen http://ift.tt/1bahYX8

Presenting The Latest Country To Lose Confidence In The Dollar…

Submitted by Simon Black of Sovereign Man blog,

Zimbabwe. You remember those guys, right?

The country’s plight with its currency became world famous, the butt of untold jokes in economic circles. At its height, hyperinflation in Zimbabwe reached nearly 90 sextillion in 2008.

That’s a 9 with 22 zeros.

To put it in context, if you had 90 sextillion grains of sand, you could cover the entire surface of the earth all the way to the outmost layers of the atmosphere.

Then, in April 2009, the government effectively abandoned the Zimbabwe dollar. The US dollar became the official currency for all government transactions, and US dollars, British pounds sterling, euros, and South African rand became the most widely used tender in circulation.

I’ve traveled to Zimbabwe frequently; they have some of the best stories you could ever hear about standing in line at the banks with wheelbarrows, and using stacks of paper currency at home for toilet paper or furniture.

Given that Zimbabwe is literally THE poster child for hyperinflation over the last half-century, one cannot understate the irony of their latest announcement.

Just yesterday, the government there announced that the Chinese renminbi (among other currencies) will become legal tender in Zimbabwe.

This is big news. As we have discussed so many times in the past, the current fiscal and monetary antics in the United States are absolutely no different than what Zimbabwe employed several years ago.

Zimbabwe printed its currency in nearly infinite quantities. So has the United States. The only difference is that the US dollar is readily accepted around the world thanks to good ole’ American credibility that was built by previous generations.

But that credibility is rapidly deteriorating. And everywhere you look, there are obvious signs that the rest of the world is quickly moving on from the dollar.

Central banks around the world are stocking up on gold. Major powers like China and Russia are calling for a new reserve currency. And a number of nations (Zimbabwe is the latest) have already begun to use other currencies like the renminbi for international trade and central bank reserves.

It’s happening. And it’s one of those things that will play out like what Hemingway wrote about going bankrupt: gradually, then suddenly.

The dollar’s share of global reserves has slowly fallen from roughly 75% in 2001, to just over 60% today.

But the world will eventually reach a bifurcation point where investors, foreign governments, central banks, etc. panic and start rushing for the exits.

It’s something that could happen tomorrow. Or five years from now. No one knows. But rational, intelligent people shouldn’t be waiting around for it to happen.

I very strongly recommend that you take a portion of your savings and move them into real assets– precious metals and productive land are the most obvious. But even things like collectibles or nonperishable goods (like ammunition) would be preferable to US dollars.

Then there’s other currencies that you can hold. Right now, the Norwegian krone has the strongest fundamentals in the world as it is backed by the most solvent central bank on the planet.

The Hong Kong dollar is also an interesting option because it minimizes your downside currency risk while providing protection against the US dollar’s deterioration.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1hSIvsY Tyler Durden

Since They “Built Where the Government Told Them,” They Demand Government Flood Insurance Subsidies Be Restored

Flood InsuranceCongress may be about to repent its
uncharacteristic act of fiscal rectitude and environmental
protection by rolling back its flood insurance reforms from 2012.
Prior to the reforms, government flood insurance program subsidies
over the decades had encouraged lots of people to live, work, and
build in flood-prone areas. Why not? It’s really nice to live along
the banks of a river or enjoy a sunset from the balcony of your
oceanfront McMansion. And if a hurricane or flood knocks it down,
cheap government insurance will pay for the rebuilding.

Eventually recognizing that the flood insurance program was a
fiscal disaster and an environmental menace, Congress passed the
Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act. Yesterday, the
New York Times
reported:

The Biggert-Waters measure sought to reform the nation’s nearly
bankrupt flood insurance program, ending federal subsidies for
insuring buildings in flood-prone coastal areas. Over the past
decade, the cost to taxpayers of insuring those properties has
soared, as payouts for damage from Hurricanes Katrina, Irene, Isaac
and Sandy sent the program $24 billion into debt.

The aim of the measure was to shift the financial risk of
insuring flood-prone properties from taxpayers to the private
market. Homeowners, rather than taxpayers, would shoulder the true
cost of building in flood zones.

Deficit hawks liked the idea because it would curb a rapidly
rising source of government spending. Environmentalists liked the
bill because they said it would reflect the true cost of climate
change, which scientists say is ushering in an era of rising sea
levels and more damaging extreme weather, including more
flooding.

Well, that was last year. It turns out there was a reason why
private insurance was not offering flood insurance to lots of the
folks who were taking advantage of the government subsidized
policies. The risks were too high for the premiums being paid. Who
knew? From the Times:

But a year after the law passed, coastal homeowners received new
flood insurance bills that were two, three, even 10 times higher
than before.

In Beach Haven West, N.J., for example, Diane Mazzuca, a
furniture showroom designer, had been paying $595 annually for
flood insurance on her $90,000 home. After Biggert-Waters ended
federal flood insurance subsidies last June, she got an updated
bill — for $4,492….

Ms. Mazzuca has plenty of company. The insurance rate increases
hit many of the 5.5 million coastal home and business owners
covered under the National Flood Insurance Program, and came as the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, which runs the program, was
updating flood maps and placing thousands of homes inside flood
zones for the first time. Last summer and fall, homeowners near
coasts, rivers and wetlands saw their insurance rates soar and
their property values plummet.

The homeowners’ frustration erupted into a grass-roots lobbying
campaign to roll back the Biggert-Waters act, and lawmakers in
Washington quickly got the message.

For example, the pro-rollback interest group, the New
Orleans-based
Coalition for Sustainable Flood Insurance
issued a press
release arguing: 

To be clear, if Biggert-Waters 2012 goes forward unabated,
hundreds of thousands, and perhaps millions, of Americans who have
played by the rules, built where the government told
them
(emphasis added), maintained insurance, and never
flooded will lose everything.

And so it appears that bipartisan majorities in the Senate and
the House will be voting for the Homeowner Flood Insurance
Affordabiiity Act. Did you catch that the National Flood Insurance
Program is right now $24 billion overdrawn?

For more background, check out John Stossel’s classic 2004
Reason article “Confessions
of a Welfare Queen
” in which the architect for his new
oceanfront house tells him not to worry:

In 1980 I built a wonderful beach house. Four bedrooms — every
room with a view of the Atlantic Ocean.

It was an absurd place to build, right on the edge of the ocean.
All that stood between my house and ruin was a hundred feet of
sand. My father told me: “Don’t do it; it’s too risky. No one
should build so close to an ocean.”

But I built anyway.

Why? As my eager-for-the-business architect said, “Why not? If
the ocean destroys your house, the government will pay for a new
one.”

What? Why would the government do that? Why would it encourage
people to build in such risky places? That would be insane.

Recall that one good definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over yet expecting to get a different result. Sounds
a lot like the normal operations of Congress.

Disclosure: I have bought flood insurance from FEMA for my
cabin for the past 18 years.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jOGYbf
via IFTTT