Edward Snowden Senses "Significant Threats" to His Life, Supreme Court Strikes Down Part of Drug War Policy, Sochi Mayor Says No Gays in the City: P.M. Links

  • In his first television interview, Edward Snowden said he
    believes there are “significant
    threats
    ” to his life and that European efforts to protect
    citizens’ data against US surveillance by building their own
    national internet networks are
    likely to fail
    .
  • The Supreme Court has ruled that if a drug user dies or is
    seriously injured after taking in multiple substances, a dealer who
    supplied one of the items can get an enhanced sentence only if that
    one drug was the actual
    cause of the death or injury
    .
  • Smartphone games
    and apps
    , such as Angry Birds, are an easy way for spy
    agencies like the NSA to snatch all kinds of personal information,
    according to previously undisclosed classified
    documents. 
  • A Florida constitutional amendment calling for
    medical marijuana
    will be decided by Florida voters in November
    now that the state Supreme Court ruled Monday that the proposed
    initiative and ballot summary aren’t misleading.
  • A North Carolina police officer faces the second
    grand jury proceeding in a week
     for the fatal shooting of
    an ex-college football player who was reportedly seeking assistance
    after a car accident.
  • The U.S. military has carried out
    a missile strike in Somalia
    against a suspected militant leader
    with ties to al-Qaeda and al-Shabab.
  • The mayor of Sochi, Russia claims there are
    no gay people
    in the city. There is, however, a
    lot of corruption
    in how money is being used in preparation of
    the Olympics, according to a Russian opposition leader.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7
content 
widgets for your
websites.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter,
and don’t forget to
 sign
up
 for Reason’s daily updates for more
content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1et6yew
via IFTTT

Ira Stoll Says Guacamole Is the Real Winner of the Super Bowl

On the sidelines of the Super Bowl battle
between the Seattle Seahawks and the Denver Broncos is a classic
immigrant success story. It’s the food you’ll be eating as you
watch the game – guacamole. Ira Stoll says the international
influence on Super Bowl snack food is just one way that immigrants
and their descendants have enriched the big game and America as a
whole.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1et6v2w
via IFTTT

Political Analysis vs. Tech Business in the Real World, or, Why Ezra Klein Might Not Conquer the World

Interesting and news-to-me numbers from Nicholas Carlson
at Business Insider with some
insight into why
the Washington Post was willing to
make what seemed to the political pundit class such an obvious
mistake as allowing the Brilliant Young Star ® Ezra Klein
leave them for other internet pastures.

Turns out that the same company, Vox Media, that poached Klein
and his Wonkblog did the same successfully a few years back with
the Engadget blog, on tech business and culture, and did well with
it under new umbrella of The Verge.

But those two worlds of journalism are way more different than I
knew, proving that the world (healthily) is more interested in tech
business than they are in Washington brouhahas and Bigthink:

Unlike Engadget, Wonkblog is tiny.

….Wonkblog averages 4 million pageviews per
month.

By comparison, when Vox raided Engadget, Engadget was
huge. In December 2010, Engadget had more than 12 million
unique visitors and more than 200 million pageviews……

With various reasonable guesses, Carlson concludes
that:

….a safe estimate for Wonkblog 2.0 is that it will
generate $500,000 in annual revenues for Vox in its first few
years. {But] [f]
or the bottom line figure, Bankoff
will probably need red ink. Klein already has 8 staffers and
he wants to hire 22 more. Each staffer will probably cost at least
$100,000 in salary and benefits. 

And getting fresh traffic, even with old stars, isn’t that
sure a thing:

….three years after…Vox raided Engadget, The Verge is
now up to 10 million unique visitors per month – about 83% the size
of Engadget back then.

Vox is, of course, thrilled to have a site that is 83% the size
of Engadget in 2010. 

But, in 2016, will it be thrilled to have a site that 83% the
size of Wonkblog in 2014? 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1mPkrZ5
via IFTTT

Bitcoin-Inspired Project Launched to Decentralize the Internet

Bitcoin, the peer-to-peer cryptocurrency is
taking the conventional financial system by storm. The Bitcoin boom
has inspired developers to explore additional applications of the
same fundamental protocols. Ambitious Bitcloud developers are
asking, why not the use the same tools to decentralize the
Internet?

BBC News
quotes
the project’s anonymous founders issuing this call to
arms:

If you’re interested in privacy, security, ending internet
censorship, decentralising the internet and creating a new mesh
network to replace the internet, then you should join or support
this project.

The advantages of a Bitcloud network are many. Bitcloud’s
decentralized structure would allow users to sidestep National
Security Agency (NSA) snoops. While natural disasters and wars
threaten a centralized structure, a decentralized structure would
mean the Internet is more likely to remain intact.

How does it work? Under the current system, consumers are
dependent on concentrated Internet Service Providers, businesses
like Comcast and AT&T, that offer Internet access. Just as
Bitcoin removes financial intermediaries from the system, Bitcloud
hopes to displace intermediary ISPs. While ISPs are at risk of
interference, a decentralized system is irrepressible. Shutting
down a decentralized internet would require targeting and
destroying each individual node.

Bitcoin requires miners who contribute computing power to
process transactions. Similarly, Bitcloud rewards users for
contributing bandwidth. Basically, ISPs would be replaced by
individuals whose computers “would perform tasks such as storing,
routing and providing bandwidth, in return for payment.”

Some tech intellectuals have called for a decentralized Internet
structure, or mesh networks, in the past. Primavera De
Filippi, a Harvard research fellow of distributed online
architectures,
argues
 that beyond the “obvious benefits” like
NSA-resistance and enhanced reliability, it provides some
interesting cultural benefits. “What’s really revolutionary about
mesh networking isn’t the novel use of technology. It’s the fact
that it provides a means for people to self-organize
into communities and share resources amongst themselves: Mesh
networks are operated by the community, for the community.
Especially because the internet has become essential to our
everyday life” she wrote in Wired.

According to BBC News,
Bitcloud developers hope Bitcloud will ultimately supplant the
Internet. De Filippi, on the other hand, thinks mesh-networks would
make a good supplementary tool.

But either way, BitCloud is a revolutionary project with global
reach. It would provide users with more reliable Internet, handicap
government surveillance, and maybe even save
lives
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/Mmqidx
via IFTTT

What Will AAPL’s Profit Margins Be? Just Ask Foxconn… And Discover A Stunning Development In China-US Wage Parity

In just over an hour Apple will report earnings which are expected to be a sole silver lining among the otherwise dreary retail landscape of the fourth quarter. However, those curious for an advance glimpse of what AAPL’s margins may be are advised to look no further than its chief supplier – Taiwanese mega contract manufacturer FoxConn, with over 1.2 million employees on the mainland. The reason Foxconn may be of interest is that as Reuters reports, as a result of soaring wages on the mainland, and in its ongoing strategy to keep worker compensation as razor thin as possible, the fabricator is now actively looking to expand outside of China. Among the places considered? Indonesia of course. And, drumroll, the United States! In other words, from the perspective of Foxconn, US labor now has greater wage competitiveness than China.

From Reuters:

Beset by rising costs and labour unrest in China, Chairman Terry Gou told employees on Sunday that Foxconn is considering diversifying away from its manufacturing heartland. The world’s largest contract maker of electronic goods has little choice if it’s to protect margins and stay ahead of peers who have adapted the Foxconn playbook into their own success stories.

 

“The U.S. is a must-go market,” said Gou, speaking at the group’s annual party on Sunday to mark the end of the Chinese year. Many customers and partners have asked Foxconn to open shop in the U.S., Gou said, with an eye on advanced manufacturing much closer to their home base.

 

At the same time, Indonesia will be a top priority this year as a potential production base with attractive costs and skills. That would tie in with Foxconn’s deal to design and market phones in the country with BlackBerry Ltd as the Canadian company seeks to reverse its decline in the smartphone business.

 

“Foxconn has no choice but to do it,” said Danny Lee, a fund manager of Mega Financial Holding’s fund unit. “China is no longer a manufacturing hub for companies worldwide, especially so for the PC industry.”

 

In the U.S., Foxconn businesses like flagship unit Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, Foxconn Technology Co Ltd and FIH Mobile could take advantage of geographical proximity to open up new deals with partners like Apple as they develop new gadgets.

 

“I think they’re looking more closely at the U.S. in order to move closer to some of their biggest clients. Obama is also really pushing to return manufacturing to America and boost employment opportunities,” said Kuo Ming-Chi, an analyst at Taipei-based KGI Securities.

This is indeed a stunning development: recall that we asked, rhetorically, back in May 2011 “With China Forecast To Reach Wage Parity With The US In Five Years, Is A New Manufacturing Golden Age Coming To The US?” Or some time in early 2016. Well, nearly 3 years later, we get the first proof that wage parity may indeed be coming, and much faster than previously expected.

Is the Fed to thank for this imminent manufacturing renaissance? Recall what we said in 2011:

the more the Fed exports inflation, paradoxically the faster the US manufacturing job base would see a long overdue renaissance. Which certainly means that the Fed will never stop with its monetary easing stimulus until such time as labor costs in the two countries, on whatever subjective metric is dominant, finally hit parity. The only question, as noted above, is what will China do in the interim as it realizes the Fed has put it in check – will China focus on developing its middle class, with an outcome being the mirror image of the current Nash equilibrium, in which the Chinese middle class would buy from the US, or will China defect before the “export country” to “consumer class” transition is complete and everything falls apart.

It is quite possible that while China was napping, the Fed’s exporting of wage inflation just succeeded to get the US to relative wage parity with China – something most considered impossible as recently as 5 years ago. However, if indeed true, this means that the Chinese response will only have more urgency now that it suddenly may find itself competing with workers from places such as the US.

In the meantime, if Foxconn’s margins have indeed collapsed as the above would seem to suggest, watch as they pass through these rising labor costs to its marquee clients. Like Apple. For the answer if this indeed happened, we will know in just about an hour.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1b1ZxR6 Tyler Durden

What Will AAPL's Profit Margins Be? Just Ask Foxconn… And Discover A Stunning Development In China-US Wage Parity

In just over an hour Apple will report earnings which are expected to be a sole silver lining among the otherwise dreary retail landscape of the fourth quarter. However, those curious for an advance glimpse of what AAPL’s margins may be are advised to look no further than its chief supplier – Taiwanese mega contract manufacturer FoxConn, with over 1.2 million employees on the mainland. The reason Foxconn may be of interest is that as Reuters reports, as a result of soaring wages on the mainland, and in its ongoing strategy to keep worker compensation as razor thin as possible, the fabricator is now actively looking to expand outside of China. Among the places considered? Indonesia of course. And, drumroll, the United States! In other words, from the perspective of Foxconn, US labor now has greater wage competitiveness than China.

From Reuters:

Beset by rising costs and labour unrest in China, Chairman Terry Gou told employees on Sunday that Foxconn is considering diversifying away from its manufacturing heartland. The world’s largest contract maker of electronic goods has little choice if it’s to protect margins and stay ahead of peers who have adapted the Foxconn playbook into their own success stories.

 

“The U.S. is a must-go market,” said Gou, speaking at the group’s annual party on Sunday to mark the end of the Chinese year. Many customers and partners have asked Foxconn to open shop in the U.S., Gou said, with an eye on advanced manufacturing much closer to their home base.

 

At the same time, Indonesia will be a top priority this year as a potential production base with attractive costs and skills. That would tie in with Foxconn’s deal to design and market phones in the country with BlackBerry Ltd as the Canadian company seeks to reverse its decline in the smartphone business.

 

“Foxconn has no choice but to do it,” said Danny Lee, a fund manager of Mega Financial Holding’s fund unit. “China is no longer a manufacturing hub for companies worldwide, especially so for the PC industry.”

 

In the U.S., Foxconn businesses like flagship unit Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, Foxconn Technology Co Ltd and FIH Mobile could take advantage of geographical proximity to open up new deals with partners like Apple as they develop new gadgets.

 

“I think they’re looking more closely at the U.S. in order to move closer to some of their biggest clients. Obama is also really pushing to return manufacturing to America and boost employment opportunities,” said Kuo Ming-Chi, an analyst at Taipei-based KGI Securities.

This is indeed a stunning development: recall that we asked, rhetorically, back in May 2011 “With China Forecast To Reach Wage Parity With The US In Five Years, Is A New Manufacturing Golden Age Coming To The US?” Or some time in early 2016. Well, nearly 3 years later, we get the first proof that wage parity may indeed be coming, and much faster than previously expected.

Is the Fed to thank for this imminent manufacturing renaissance? Recall what we said in 2011:

the more the Fed exports inflation, paradoxically the faster the US manufacturing job base would see a long overdue renaissance. Which certainly means that the Fed will never stop with its monetary easing stimulus until such time as labor costs in the two countries, on whatever subjective metric is dominant, finally hit parity. The only question, as noted above, is what will China do in the interim as it realizes the Fed has put it in check – will China focus on developing its middle class, with an outcome being the mirror image of the current Nash equilibrium, in which the Chinese middle class would buy from the US, or will China defect before the “export country” to “consumer class” transition is complete and everything falls apart.

It is quite possible that while China was napping, the Fed’s exporting of wage inflation just succeeded to get the US to relative wage parity with China – something most considered impossible as recently as 5 years ago. However, if indeed true, this means that the Chinese response will only have more urgency now that it suddenly may find itself competing with workers from places such as the US.

In the meantime, if Foxconn’s margins have indeed collapsed as the above would seem to suggest, watch as they pass through these rising labor costs to its marquee clients. Like Apple. For the answer if this indeed happened, we will know in just about an hour.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1b1ZxR6 Tyler Durden

Take a Look Inside the Wasteful Spending of the Most Expensive Winter Olympics Ever

Free-market-loving, pro-transparency, anti-corruption activist
and former Moscow mayoral candidate Alexei Navalni has launched a
stellar website to help world citizens see exactly who is raking in
the rubles at the Sochi Olympics.

The site is here, and it’s
in English, allowing people to discover which oligarchs and friends
of President Vladimir Putin are building overpriced facilities for
the most expensive Olympics ever. The Associated Press
notes
:

Russia has spent about $51 billion to deliver the Olympics in
Sochi, which run Feb. 7-23, making them the most expensive Olympics
ever even though winter games have many fewer athletes competing
than summer games do.

Navalny claims that Russia spent twice as much as necessary to
build at least 10 of the Olympic venues — including the Bolshoi Ice
Palace, the Fisht Stadium for the opening/closing ceremonies and
the speed-skating arena.

Allegations of corruption have dogged preparations for the Sochi
Games for years, as reported by The Associated Press and others.
Navalny’s new website — Sochi.FBK.info — combines data gathered
during his own investigations along with media reports and other
activists’ analysis.

But who can put a price on the respect the country would get ... if everybody weren't horrified about them beating up the gays.

The site is very slick and will make Western data-driven
investigative reporters applaud. It documents a couple dozen sites
connected to the Olympics themselves or the infrastructure to host
the Olympics, detailing the financial travails, overpayments, and
potential problems for each location. For example, the builders of
the Olympic Village received a state loan for more than $670
million to build housing. After the Olympics, the company expects
to recoup the costs by selling the housing in the resort community.
But based on the construction prices, in order to recoup the costs,
the site claims, a single guest room will have to be sold for the
price a two-bedroom apartment goes for in Moscow. Experts don’t
believe there is enough demand for the housing. The state bank has
already declared the loans “bad,” and if the village tanks after
the Olympics, the losses will be covered by the federal budget.

The site documents how overpriced each Olympic venue is with
breezy comparisons (instead of buying a seat at the Bolshoy Ice
Dome, you could buy a new Toyota Corolla) and compares them to the
prices of similar previous Olympic venues.

Olympic overspending is nothing new and Russia is hardly unique,
though clearly they’re taking it to a degree not yet seen before.
Despite an audit from the Russian government showing at least a
half-billion in overspending, Putin was dismissive, saying the
whole problem was due to “honest mistakes” in estimating costs,
according to the AP. Putin must classify himself among those
honest-mistakers, as he said last spring the Olympics would cost
$6.5 billion, according to the site. Off by a factor of about
eight, there, Mr. President.

Reason’s Zenon Evans analyzed Navalny’s failed effort to defeat
a Putin crony to become mayor of Moscow
here
. Nick Gillespie notes that Olympics are always big money
losers here.
The Sochi Olympics may yet end up being the money-losingest of them
all, except for those friends of Putin’s.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1hFC2BQ
via IFTTT

Modern Liberalism: It Can Be Very Strange, Or, Don’t You Know People Have Traditionally Been Slaves?

In the latest of a now apparently endless stream of generic
attacks on libertarianism in more mainstream or liberal-leaning
intellectual outposts, see
this from Claude S. Fischer (a U Cal Berkeley sociology prof)
in

Boston Review
.

It refreshingly headlines what is pretty much the intellectual
heft of most such plaints against libertarianism: “Libertarianism
is Very Strange.”

Why? Is it because some of us advocate such avant-garde notions
as competing private defense agencies, tort over regulatory law to
keep businesses from harming people, or full liberty of drug and
food consumption?

Nah, libertarianism’s weirdness is deeper than that. We are
truly through the rabbit hole here, my mainstream liberal friends,
dealing with libertarian loons who seem to believe that people
are individuals and should be treated as such!

Why, don’t libertarians realize that:

For most of history, including Philadelphia, 1776, more humans
were effectively property than free. Children, youth, women,
slaves, and servants belonged to patriarchs; many patriarchs were
themselves serfs to chiefs and lords. And selling oneself into
slavery was routine for the poor in many societies. Most world
cultures have treated the individual as a limb of the household,
lineage, or tribe. We moderns abhor the idea of punishing the
brother or child of a wrongdoer, but in many cultures collective
punishment makes perfect sense, for each person is just part of the
whole.

What difference does this history and anthropology make to
libertarian arguments about the good life? Plenty. If libertarians
would move real-world policy in their direction, then their
premises about humans and human society should be at least remotely
plausible; we are not playing SimCity here.

In other words, post-Enlightenment modernity is very
strange
, and libertarians take aspects of it so seriously it
freaks me out. It isn’t just that Mr. Fischer is bothered by
Rothbard, Nozick, or even Rand Paul. Everything that has led us as
far as we have toward modern democratic capitalism strikes him as
apparently anti-human in a deep and profound sense. 

Indeed, Mr. Fischer, we aren’t playing SimCity. It’s a shame so
much modern governance, even today, tries to pretend we are as it
tries to manipulate people by force to meet the goals of the
state.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1hFC24J
via IFTTT

Modern Liberalism: It Can Be Very Strange, Or, Don't You Know People Have Traditionally Been Slaves?

In the latest of a now apparently endless stream of generic
attacks on libertarianism in more mainstream or liberal-leaning
intellectual outposts, see
this from Claude S. Fischer (a U Cal Berkeley sociology prof)
in

Boston Review
.

It refreshingly headlines what is pretty much the intellectual
heft of most such plaints against libertarianism: “Libertarianism
is Very Strange.”

Why? Is it because some of us advocate such avant-garde notions
as competing private defense agencies, tort over regulatory law to
keep businesses from harming people, or full liberty of drug and
food consumption?

Nah, libertarianism’s weirdness is deeper than that. We are
truly through the rabbit hole here, my mainstream liberal friends,
dealing with libertarian loons who seem to believe that people
are individuals and should be treated as such!

Why, don’t libertarians realize that:

For most of history, including Philadelphia, 1776, more humans
were effectively property than free. Children, youth, women,
slaves, and servants belonged to patriarchs; many patriarchs were
themselves serfs to chiefs and lords. And selling oneself into
slavery was routine for the poor in many societies. Most world
cultures have treated the individual as a limb of the household,
lineage, or tribe. We moderns abhor the idea of punishing the
brother or child of a wrongdoer, but in many cultures collective
punishment makes perfect sense, for each person is just part of the
whole.

What difference does this history and anthropology make to
libertarian arguments about the good life? Plenty. If libertarians
would move real-world policy in their direction, then their
premises about humans and human society should be at least remotely
plausible; we are not playing SimCity here.

In other words, post-Enlightenment modernity is very
strange
, and libertarians take aspects of it so seriously it
freaks me out. It isn’t just that Mr. Fischer is bothered by
Rothbard, Nozick, or even Rand Paul. Everything that has led us as
far as we have toward modern democratic capitalism strikes him as
apparently anti-human in a deep and profound sense. 

Indeed, Mr. Fischer, we aren’t playing SimCity. It’s a shame so
much modern governance, even today, tries to pretend we are as it
tries to manipulate people by force to meet the goals of the
state.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1hFC24J
via IFTTT