Window Dressing On, Window Dressing Off… Amounting To $140 Billion In Two Days

On December 31 we demonstrated the biggest operation in the history of the Fed’s temporary open market operations: a $198 billion reverse repo under its brand new fixed-rate scheme, which, at least according to the Fed, was supposed to be a mechanism designed to prepare the market for the “normalization” of the Fed’s balance sheet and allow seamless liquidity extraction. What the Fed did not announce was that it was also the biggest collateral window-dressing scheme ever conceived (that there was $200 billion in free liquidity sloshing around was a distant second highlight).

What we said then was that “We will leave it up to readers to decide what is more surreal: that the Fed is allowing banks to “window dress” to the tune of several times more than total Treasury holdings owned by the Primary Dealers as disclosed by the Fed, or that there is an unprecedented $200 billion in free liquidity floating out there.”

Well, if what happened in the last days of 2013 was indeed merely reverse repo-assisted window dressing, then we would expect the that first days of 2014 should see a comparable collapse in the magnitude of the Fed’s reverse repo operations. Sure enough, as the chart below shows, this is precisely what has happened following today’s far more modest $56.7 billion reverse repo operation conducted among 50 bidding counterparties and the Fed, of course.

In short: collateral window dressing on; collateral window dressing off, all with the blessing of the banks’ overarching regulator, the Federal Reserve. What is most disturbing is that both the world’s largest financial firms, and by implication the Fed, just admitted there is a massive collateral shortage currently if banks are forced to pad their books to the tune of nearly $200 billion in “high quality collateral” just to pass year-end auditor muster.

And a tangent: in the past two days, the Fed has first withdrawn and subsequently re-injected a record $140 billion in liquidity, or nearly two months’ worth of post-taper POMO. One may be tempted to wonder just where it is that these hundreds of billions in fungible electronic monetary equivalents have ended up…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ZYqKy5qfuRk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Physical Gold Demand Soared As Gold Price Tumbled In 2013

Sales of gold coins are booming even as the precious metal’s price is falling (and it’s not just central banks). Despite gold futures 28% drop in 2013 (its worst since 1981), the WSJ reports that demand for gold coins shot up 63% ti 241.6 metric tons in the first three quarters of 2013.

Because these investors intend to hold onto their gold for years or decades, many see the recent drop as an opportunity to buy more at a cheaper price, notes on strategist, “they’re not under any pressure to get a yield or a return in a year.”

Still, the importance of gold coins has been eclipsed in recent years by the rapid growth of exchange-traded funds, some analysts say, “hedge funds tend to overpower the impact of physical gold purchases… relatively little money gets them an awful lot of market power.” Unlike hedge funds, who may leave when prices fall, it is clear that coin buyers are in for the long haul.

 

 

Via WSJ,

Sales of gold coins are booming even as the metal’s price is falling, a testament to gold’s continued appeal for small investors and collectors despite its first bear market in more than a decade.

 

The heightened appetite for physical gold is a rare bright spot in a market that saw hedge funds and other large investors head for the exits last year. Gold futures prices tumbled 28% in 2013, their worst performance since 1981.

 

But at mints and coin shops around the world, gold continued flying off the shelves.

 

 

Sales of Gold Maple Leaf coins by the Royal Canadian Mint surged 82.5% to 876,000 ounces in the first three quarters of 2013 from the same period of 2012. The Perth Mint, Australia’s national coin and bar producer, saw sales rise 41% to 754,635 ounces last year, while the U.S. Mint sold 14% more American Eagle gold coins than it did in 2012, along with a record amount of silver coins.

 

 

Because these investors intend to hold onto their gold for years or decades, many see the recent drop as an opportunity to buy more at a cheaper price, he added. “They’re not under any pressure to get a yield or a return in a year,” Mr. Melek said.

 

 

Some think the continued strength of physical gold buying will prevent prices from falling much further, as it becomes clear that a core group of investors is sticking with the market,

 

 

It’s obvious to me that at some point our dollar will see a downturn in its value,” said Mr. McClintock, who runs a contract post office. “Gold is just a good comfort, it’s a commodity that anybody in the world knows and you don’t need to be an expert to understand.”

 

 

Still, the importance of gold coins has been eclipsed in recent years by the rapid growth of exchange-traded funds, some analysts say.

 

 

“Folks like hedge funds tend to overpower the impact of physical gold purchases,” Mr. Melek said. “Relatively little money gets them an awful lot of market power.”

 

Unlike hedge funds, who may leave when prices fall, many coin buyers are in for the long haul.

 

 

Most people who buy physical gold aren’t doing it for the same reason you’d purchase a stock,” said Mike Getlin, vice president with Merit Financial, a bullion and coin dealership in Santa Monica, Calif. “They tend to have a much longer investment horizon. They tend to hold onto them forever and pride of ownership is a huge factor in that.”


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/NJDwZGv4zU0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Fizzing Optimism For Wild Financial Engineering

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com   www.amazon.com/author/wolfrichter

Nothing could have been a more pungent metaphor for the current investment climate than the headline, “Macau gambling revenue hits record $45 bn in 2013.”

Revenues jumped 18.6%, after rising “just” 13.5% in 2012 – which had caused a lot of handwringing, since they’d soared 42% in 2011. Post-financial-crisis Macau – like its bigger sister, high finance – fizzes with optimism. Last year, it extracted $45 billion from the pockets of people who gambled there; this year, it’s going to set another record.

Or maybe there was an even more pungent metaphor: Stephen Cohen’s pad in Manhattan. He personifies the smart money; his hedge fund, SAC Capital Advisors, pleaded guilty to insider trading and agreed to pay a fine of $1.2 billion and wind itself out of existence. So he is trying to sell his 9,000-square-foot duplex on the 51st and 52nd floors of Bloomberg Tower. The metaphor isn’t that he dropped his asking price by $17 million, from $115 million down to a measly $98 million, but what he’d paid for the two units in 2005, namely $25.9 million, plus whatever it took to combine and remodel them. That he thinks he can get nearly four times the amount he’d paid for it less than nine years ago – that’s the metaphor for our crazy investment climate.

Hedge funds raked in the moolah in 2013, with assets under management rising by $228.8 billion to an all-time record of $2.01 trillion – not counting the hedge funds that our TBTF banks have become. But returns paled compared to the miracles the Fed performed with the stock market. Hedge funds specializing in distressed debt outperformed all other strategies with a 16.8% gain, ahead of long/short equities hedge funds, up 14.3%, and event-driven hedge funds, up 11.3%. Compared to 29% for the S&P 500.

But hey, what matters is that the all-important metric of assets under management gets pushed to new highs. Hedge funds get paid 2% on it, come hell or high water, so about $40 billion in 2013. And they get paid another 20% on any gains, so roughly $55 billion in 2013, for a total fee intake of $95 billion or so. Hopes are riding high for a killer 2014.

Corporate deal-making also bloomed in the US in 2013: mergers rose 11% to over $1 trillion, the highest since the financial crisis. Reshuffling the corporate deck is good for everyone: CEOs, investment banks, hedge funds with insider knowledge, and workers who are going to get laid off as the post-merger synergies are being implemented….

“This era of low interest rates has encouraged companies to consolidate and clean up some structural inefficiencies,” is how Michael Carr, head of Goldman’s Americas M&A, explained the workers-getting-laid-off phenomenon. Goldman pocketed $1.5 billion in fees for its M&A advisory work.

The accelerating pace of the mergers during the last two quarters is goosing extrapolations of what an insanely good year 2014 is going to be – helped along by a “stronger economy,” some sort of “stability at the Fed,” and an inexplicable absence “of near-term economic bumps,” according to Scott Barshay, head of the Corporate Department at Wall Street law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore. In reality, to get a bumper crop of mergers, you must have a gravity-defying stock market and a continued flood of freshly printed money made available to large corporations at near-zero cost.

Companies are motivated. Stock valuations have moved into the stratosphere. Financial engineering, such as share buybacks, has been covering up, more or less elegantly, the ugly reality of stalling growth in revenues and earnings. But there will be a moment of truth.

“The pressure is building for companies to justify their trading multiples,” warned Chris Ventresca, co-head of Global M&A at JPMorgan, which pocketed $1.3 billion in fees for its M&A advisory work. “It will be hard to deliver that organically, so you have to look for inorganic growth.”

You can practically hear the fizzing optimism for IPOs. In 2013, there were 229 IPOs, raising $61.3 billion, the highest amount since 2007, and up 58% from 2012 [read my take on this and other extraordinary accomplishments in 2013….. Financial Engineering Wildest Since The 2007 Bubble]. Now even Chinese IPOs are coming back. Everything that isn’t nailed down will get shoved out the door, viable or not, at dizzying valuations. And somebody is going to end up holding the bag.

“The longer this window stays open, the more the quality of the deals falls, the more you get the piggyback deals,” explained Tony Ursillo, a tech analyst at Loomis Sayles & Co., which has $193.5 billion under management. “I feel like we’ve cleaned out a number of the first-tier companies, from a quality standpoint.”

The casino mentality that has set in, and the billions it extracts from the real economy, is dependent on the most addictive drugs of all: a flood of nearly free money. It sets off a chain reaction, including ecstatic stock markets, where IPOs without earnings can soar and where even the most convoluted mergers that will haunt stockholders for years to come seem to make divine sense – and our favorite Wall Street engineers are out making hay while they still can.

Central banks rule! They’ve accomplished the impossible: separating stock markets from the economies they’re based on. But in 2014, the US and China are trying to unwind these crazy policies – without taking down the entire global economy. Read… So This Isn’t Exactly A Rosy Outlook For 2014, Or Something


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/F9DGX0yDdlY/story01.htm testosteronepit

Puppets of the Terrorist Conspiracy

Egyptian authorities are investigating absurd
charges
that a Vodafone commercial featuring a felt puppet
contains coded terrorist messages:

Bail me out, Big Bird.Appearing on a television show on Tahrir channel
on Tuesday after the prosecution referred the case for
investigation, [activist Ahmed Spider] dissects the ad, deducing
terrorist plots in almost every word and shot of the humorous
commercial.

First, Spider says that the opening scene, which shows a cactus
plant with Christmas decorations, is an implicit threat.

Spider says that using the spiny cactus instead of the Christmas
tree is a threat of violence, symbolized by a Christmas ball on the
cactus, which he says looks like a bomb. He adds that the fact that
the cactus has four branches similar to the four-finger salute
taken up by Muslim Brotherhood supporters, means that the Muslim
Brotherhood are behind the message.

Spider proceeds to crack the code of the remainder of the
conversation, interpreting Christmas turkeys and the search for the
old phone line as evidence of terrorist attacks and the work of
secret agents and foreign intelligence.

He interprets [the puppet] Abla Fahita’’ mention of her friend
“Mama Toutou” to be a coded reference to the Muslim Brotherhood.
When Fahita retells Mama Toutou’s ordeal of her set of artificial
teeth freezing from the cold, he says that this is a reference to
the freezing of the Muslim Brotherhood’s assets.

The Web is filled with this sort of dubious deconstruction —
claiming, say, that a Batman movie includes veiled
references
 to the coming Sandy Hook and
Aurora massacres, or that Lady Gaga videos are filled with
signs of Illuminati
mind control
. But Mr. Spider, whose past glories include
accusing the Freemasons of being behind the demonstrations at
Tahrir Square, managed to inspire an official inquiry, complete
with a representative of the company coming to court to answer the
charges.

Pass the oatmeal, Osama.I wish I could report that America’s authorities
would never dabble in this sort of paranoid reading of popular
culture. Alas, I know
better
than
that
.

Elsewhere in Reason: The Al
Qaeda ties
of Sesame Street‘s Bert.

[Via Sarah
Carr
.]

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/03/puppets-of-the-terrorist-conspiracy
via IFTTT

David Brooks on Pot: Because This Is Not to My Taste, No One Else Should Be Able to Enjoy It

Matt Welch makes a couple of important points in

response
to David Brooks’ amazingly obtuse anti-pot
column
: Declining to ban somethiing is not the same as
endorsing it, and there is nothing “subtl[e]” about using violence
to stop people from consuming psychoactive substances that you fear
will prevent them from realizing their full potential. I would add
that the judgment Brooks pats himself on the back for passing
(since “many people these days shy away from talk about the moral
status of drug use”) cannot possibly justify the arbitrary
distinctions drawn by our drug laws, even if you share his
paternalistic premise.

“I don’t have any problem with somebody who gets high from time
to time,” Brooks says, but “smoking all the time” is “likely to
cumulatively fragment a person’s deep center, or at least not do
much to enhance it.” He thinks people should not smoke pot so much
that they forego the “more satisfying pleasures” and “the deeper
sources of happiness.” Instead they should be guided by “reason,
temperance and self-control.”

As I point out in my book
Saying Yes
, the same could be said of any enjoyable
activity that can be carried to excess. Drinking is the most
obvious example, but any pleasure can be the focus of an addiction
that crowds out more meaningful aspects of life. That is not an
argument for abstinence, let alone abstinence enforced by law. It
is an argument for temperance, in the original sense of the term.
Like most drug warriors, Brooks makes no effort to explain why the
possibility of excess justifies the prohibition of marijuana but
not the prohibition of alcohol and every other fun thing. His
argument brings to mind Marge Simpson’s case
against mixed martial arts competitions: “Call me a killjoy, but I
think that because this is not to my taste, no one else should be
able to enjoy it.”

That is the impulse underlying marijuana prohibition, which is
fundamentally a matter
of taste
. David Brooks is not satisfied with railing against
pot from his perch at The New York Times. He needs to
impose his pharmacological preferences by force. Because he
used to smoke pot but does not care for it anymore, he wants to
lock people in cages for supplying it. There is nothing moral about
that demand.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/03/david-brooks-on-pot-because-this-is-not
via IFTTT

The “Record Recovery”, At Least For Porsche

While the non-luxury auto-manufacturers suffered from a case of cannel-stuffed constipation in December, Luxury brands appeared to do very well thank you Mr. Bernanke:

  • *PORSCHE REPORTS RECORD SALES IN ’13 21% RISE OVER ’12
  • *PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA DEC. SALES UP 10%

As the company notes, it “exceeded 40,000 sales for the first time in the history of Porsche in the US,” as the 911 sold 10,442 units and Cayenne 18,507 units.

 

 

Porsche PR Statement:

Porsche Reports Record Sales in 2013; 21 percent increase over 2012

Best-ever U.S. sales fueled by 911, Cayenne models

Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA), the exclusive U.S. importer of Porsche sports cars including the Macan and Cayenne SUVs and the Panamera sports sedan, today announced it has once again set an all-time U.S. sales record, with 42,323 cars sold in 2013 (plus 21 percent over 2012). The previous record year for Porsche in the U.S. was 2012 when 35,043 cars were sold. In December 2013, Porsche dealers sold 3,246 cars, an increase of 10 percent over last December.

Exceeding 40,000 sales for the first time in the history of Porsche in the U.S. makes us very proud,” said Detlev von Platen, President and CEO, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. “This success was possible only through the combination of a strong product offering, a highly professional sales organization and a team of dedicated dealers,” he added. “Since introducing 22 new models and variants into the U.S. market in 2013, we are entering the New Year with our youngest product line ever – thus, we are confident that we can continue writing the success story of Porsche in the U.S. over the next 12 months.”

The flagship 911 completed a strong anniversary year in 2013, with 10,442 units sold and the introduction of six new model variants including the limited-edition “50^th Anniversary” model. In December, the top-of-the-line 911 models (GT3, Turbo, Turbo Cabriolet) arrived at U.S. dealers, with those models accounting for four percent of December 911 sales.

Sales of the mid-engine Boxster and Cayman models were equally strong, with a combined total of 7,953 units, representing a 137 percent increase year-over-year. The newly-launched Cayman and Cayman S models were popular as well, with 3,383 units sold.

The Cayenne line carried equal weight in the automaker’s 2013 sales success, with 18,507 sold in all of 2013 (plus 16 percent over last year). With sales of 5,386, the Cayenne Diesel had a 29 percent share of overall Cayenne sales. With the arrival of the Macan compact SUV, its fifth model line, in the spring of 2014 Porsche will be entering into the fastest-growing vehicle market with the sportiest cross-over in that segment.
 

Last year, Porsche recorded a roughly even split of sales between its four-door and two-door sports cars (57 percent/43 percent).

Certified Pre-Owned Sales finished 2013 at 10,130 units, up 7 percent over 2012 (9,506).

 

++++++++

Thank You Ben…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ywFCrhqxUyk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The "Record Recovery", At Least For Porsche

While the non-luxury auto-manufacturers suffered from a case of cannel-stuffed constipation in December, Luxury brands appeared to do very well thank you Mr. Bernanke:

  • *PORSCHE REPORTS RECORD SALES IN ’13 21% RISE OVER ’12
  • *PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA DEC. SALES UP 10%

As the company notes, it “exceeded 40,000 sales for the first time in the history of Porsche in the US,” as the 911 sold 10,442 units and Cayenne 18,507 units.

 

 

Porsche PR Statement:

Porsche Reports Record Sales in 2013; 21 percent increase over 2012

Best-ever U.S. sales fueled by 911, Cayenne models

Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA), the exclusive U.S. importer of Porsche sports cars including the Macan and Cayenne SUVs and the Panamera sports sedan, today announced it has once again set an all-time U.S. sales record, with 42,323 cars sold in 2013 (plus 21 percent over 2012). The previous record year for Porsche in the U.S. was 2012 when 35,043 cars were sold. In December 2013, Porsche dealers sold 3,246 cars, an increase of 10 percent over last December.

Exceeding 40,000 sales for the first time in the history of Porsche in the U.S. makes us very proud,” said Detlev von Platen, President and CEO, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. “This success was possible only through the combination of a strong product offering, a highly professional sales organization and a team of dedicated dealers,” he added. “Since introducing 22 new models and variants into the U.S. market in 2013, we are entering the New Year with our youngest product line ever – thus, we are confident that we can continue writing the success story of Porsche in the U.S. over the next 12 months.”

The flagship 911 completed a strong anniversary year in 2013, with 10,442 units sold and the introduction of six new model variants including the limited-edition “50^th Anniversary” model. In December, the top-of-the-line 911 models (GT3, Turbo, Turbo Cabriolet) arrived at U.S. dealers, with those models accounting for four percent of December 911 sales.

Sales of the mid-engine Boxster and Cayman models were equally strong, with a combined total of 7,953 units, representing a 137 percent increase year-over-year. The newly-launched Cayman and Cayman S models were popular as well, with 3,383 units sold.

The Cayenne line carried equal weight in the automaker’s 2013 sales success, with 18,507 sold in all of 2013 (plus 16 percent over last year). With sales of 5,386, the Cayenne Diesel had a 29 percent share of overall Cayenne sales. With the arrival of the Macan compact SUV, its fifth model line, in the spring of 2014 Porsche will be entering into the fastest-growing vehicle market with the sportiest cross-over in that segment.
 

Last year, Porsche recorded a roughly even split of sales between its four-door and two-door sports cars (57 percent/43 percent).

Certified Pre-Owned Sales finished 2013 at 10,130 units, up 7 percent over 2012 (9,506).

 

++++++++

Thank You Ben…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ywFCrhqxUyk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

A World Drowning In Fatties: 1.5 Billion Of The World’s Adults – One In Three – Are Obese Or Overweight

While it will hardly come as a surprise that in the age of pervasive, accessible and cheap pink slime fast food, more people than ever are obese, the actual numbers may be a shock to most. Conveniently, quantifying the world’s obesity epidemic is precisely what the London-based Overseas Development Institute has done with a just released report titled Future Diets (pdf link). Its findings are stunning: more than a third of all adults in the world – 1.46 billion to be exact – are obese or overweight.



The main culprit: the development world, where the number of obese has nearly quadrupled from 250 million to 904 million between 1980 and 2008. What this means for the world’s soaring healthcare costs needs little explanation: “On current trends, globally, we will see a huge increase in the number of people suffering certain types of cancer, diabetes, strokes and heart attacks, putting an enormous burden on public healthcare systems.” according to the co-author of the Future Diets report. That’s ok, the already insolvent world, drowning in record debt, obviously can afford to spend even more on a record population of fatties.

AFP summarizes the report’s main findings:

The study said the rise in obesity was down to diets changing in developing countries where incomes were rising, with people shifting away from cereals and tubers to eating more meat, fats and sugar. The overconsumption of food, coupled with increasingly sedentary lives, was also to blame. The report said there seemed to be little will among the public and leaders to take action on influencing diet in the future.

 

“Governments have focused on public awareness campaigns, but evidence shows this is not enough,” said Wiggins.

 

“The lack of action stands in stark contrast to the concerted public actions taken to limit smoking in developed countries.

 

“Politicians need to be less shy about trying to influence what food ends up on our plates. The challenge is to make healthy diets viable whilst reducing the appeal of foods which carry a less certain nutritional value.”

Below are the report’s key findings straight from the horse’s mouth:

  • Over one third of all adults across the world – 1.46 billion people – are obese or overweight. Between 1980 and 2008, the numbers of people affected in the developing world more than tripled, from 250 million to 904 million. In high-income countries the numbers increased by 1.7 times over the same period.
  • Diets are changing wherever incomes are rising in the developing world, with a marked shift from cereals and tubers to meat, fats and sugar, as well as fruit and vegetables.
  • While the forces of globalisation have led to a creeping homogenisation in diets, their continued variation suggests that there is still scope for policies that can influence the food choices that people make.
  • Future diets that are rich in animal products, especially meat, will push up prices for meat, but surprisingly, not for grains. This suggests that future diets may matter more for public health than for agriculture.
  • There seems to be little will among public and leaders to take the determined action that is needed to influence future diets, but that may change in the face of the serious health implications. Combinations of moderate measures in education, prices and regulation may achieve far more than drastic action of any one type.

Some other pretty charts from the report:

So, in other words, as long as the overweight world can eat its cake, and have others pay for the diabetes medication fees, all is well. However, once this too unsustainable ponzi scheme ends, run. Or at least jog casually away, because one doesn’t have to outrun everyone… just the fattest. And there are a lot of those around.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/rPJTaa7XtjU/story01.htm Tyler Durden

A World Drowning In Fatties: 1.5 Billion Of The World's Adults – One In Three – Are Obese Or Overweight

While it will hardly come as a surprise that in the age of pervasive, accessible and cheap pink slime fast food, more people than ever are obese, the actual numbers may be a shock to most. Conveniently, quantifying the world’s obesity epidemic is precisely what the London-based Overseas Development Institute has done with a just released report titled Future Diets (pdf link). Its findings are stunning: more than a third of all adults in the world – 1.46 billion to be exact – are obese or overweight.



The main culprit: the development world, where the number of obese has nearly quadrupled from 250 million to 904 million between 1980 and 2008. What this means for the world’s soaring healthcare costs needs little explanation: “On current trends, globally, we will see a huge increase in the number of people suffering certain types of cancer, diabetes, strokes and heart attacks, putting an enormous burden on public healthcare systems.” according to the co-author of the Future Diets report. That’s ok, the already insolvent world, drowning in record debt, obviously can afford to spend even more on a record population of fatties.

AFP summarizes the report’s main findings:

The study said the rise in obesity was down to diets changing in developing countries where incomes were rising, with people shifting away from cereals and tubers to eating more meat, fats and sugar. The overconsumption of food, coupled with increasingly sedentary lives, was also to blame. The report said there seemed to be little will among the public and leaders to take action on influencing diet in the future.

 

“Governments have focused on public awareness campaigns, but evidence shows this is not enough,” said Wiggins.

 

“The lack of action stands in stark contrast to the concerted public actions taken to limit smoking in developed countries.

 

“Politicians need to be less shy about trying to influence what food ends up on our plates. The challenge is to make healthy diets viable whilst reducing the appeal of foods which carry a less certain nutritional value.”

Below are the report’s key findings straight from the horse’s mouth:

  • Over one third of all adults across the world – 1.46 billion people – are obese or overweight. Between 1980 and 2008, the numbers of people affected in the developing world more than tripled, from 250 million to 904 million. In high-income countries the numbers increased by 1.7 times over the same period.
  • Diets are changing wherever incomes are rising in the developing world, with a marked shift from cereals and tubers to meat, fats and sugar, as well as fruit and vegetables.
  • While the forces of globalisation have led to a creeping homogenisation in diets, their continued variation suggests that there is still scope for policies that can influence the food choices that people make.
  • Future diets that are rich in animal products, especially meat, will push up prices for meat, but surprisingly, not for grains. This suggests that future diets may matter more for public health than for agriculture.
  • There seems to be little will among public and leaders to take the determined action that is needed to influence future diets, but that may change in the face of the serious health implications. Combinations of moderate measures in education, prices and regulation may achieve far more than drastic action of any one type.

Some other pretty charts from the report:

So, in other words, as long as the overweight world can eat its cake, and have others pay for the diabetes medication fees, all is well. However, once this too unsustainable ponzi scheme ends, run. Or at least jog casually away, because one doesn’t have to outrun everyone… just the fattest. And there are a lot of those around.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/rPJTaa7XtjU/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Stocks Fade To Red As Oil Dumps And Gold Jumps

As Europe closes, the ‘recovery’ in US equities has faded to red for the majors (though Trannies and all the high-beta momos are still in the green thanks to JPY just not wanting the party to stop – for now) seeimngly led by AAPL’s plunge to its 50DMA. This morning’s jerk higher appears as much about BTFD catch up for Trannies than anything else. Bonds sold off modestly but the USD continues to surge (led by EUR weakness after ugly loan creation data). WTI crude (and Brent) is tumbling further – back at $94.50 – but gold is surging back to yesterday’s highs at around $1236. VIX is stable for now around 14% as stocks rotate back to play catch-down.

 

VIX is stable as stocks catch back down to it…

 

S&P 500 futures rallied to previous support and faded back quickly….

 

But gold keeps pushing higher as Oil tumbles…

 

It appears the high-beta BTFD-ers were in early but are fading now…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/4d9_jEQFSc8/story01.htm Tyler Durden