California’s efforts to
regulate firearms out of easy availability (an official
summary of state gun regulations runs to 50 pages) continue to
bear fruit, as Smith & Wesson announces that it’s not willing
to comply with the latest round of inane rules, effectively
removing most of its pistols from the state’s market. The specific
bit of red tape pushing the company out is a requirement that new
pistols (including modifications of existing firearms) incorporate
controversial “microstamping”
technology intended to leave unique markings on fired cases.
In a press release, the company
says:
Under California’s “Unsafe Handgun Act,” any new semi-automatic
pistol introduced into that state must comply with microstamping
laws. In addition, California asserts that anything other than a
cosmetic change to a handgun already on the California Roster of
Handguns Certified for Sale, including performance enhancements and
other improvements, requires it to be removed from the roster and
retested. For semi- automatic pistols, this means it must comply
with the microstamping requirements, as well.Smith & Wesson does not and will not include microstamp ing
in its firearms. A number of studies have indicated that m
icrostamping is unreliable, serves no safety purpose, is cost
prohibitive and, most importantly, is not proven to aid in
preventing or solving crimes. The microstamping mandate and the
company’s unwillingness to adopt this so-called technology will
result in a diminishing number of Smith & Wesson semi-automatic
pistols available for purchase by California residents.This is not a problem unique to Smith & Wesson. The
microstamping legislation and California’s position regarding
performance enhancements and other improvements creates the same
challenge for all firearm manufacturers, since presumably all of
them refine and improve their products over time.
In order to retain a presence in the California market for
semi-automatic pistols, the company deliberately plans to make no
improvements to the M&P Shield and the SDVE pistols so that
they’ll remain on-sale without a need to comply with the
microstamping law. Except for the Shield, all of the M&P line
of pistols are expected to fall off the roster of guns legal for
sale in California by August 2014 (revolvers are exempt).
Microstamping is held out as one of the holy grails of modern
gun controllers seeking a technological crutch for their position,
but the National Shooting Sports Foundation calls it “a
costly and time-consuming process” that’s not especially reliable.
It’s also easily defeated by the clever expedient of swapping out
firing pins or other easily replaced parts. Or just filing down the
stamp.
Ruger Firearms already
announced that it won’t comply with the microstamping rule. The
National Shooting Sports Foundation and the Sporting Arms and
Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute have filed suit against
California over the issue
Smith & Wesson representatives didn’t respond to queries as
to whether they would follow in the footsteps of gunmakers like
Barrett and also
refuse sales to law enforcement agencies in jurisdictions that
effectively try to disarm private citizens. Such a move might
actually get officials’ attention.
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1eGc5RQ
via IFTTT