Video of the Day – Thuggish Militarized Police Terrorize and SWAT Team Iowa Family

So police in the city of Ankeny, Iowa are on the hunt for a couple of people suspected of credit card fraud. Their solution? Conduct a SWAT raid on an older woman’s Iowa home with a team of at least eight militarized, storm-trooper wannabe cops. In a raid that appears more suitable for a compound in Abbottabad than a neighborhood in the corn belt, you’d at least think they were certain they had the right home? Wrong.

The police didn’t find the suspects they were looking for, and instead went ahead and arrested two other people in completely unrelated charges to justify their ridiculous behavior. If not for the fact the family had security cameras installed (which the police made every attempt to dismantle), we would have no evidence of this wildly inappropriate behavior. You seriously have to wonder what is wrong with these people. Are they still being taught their mission is to “Protect and Serve” or has this been change to “Probe and SWAT.” One seriously has to wonder.

This video is brought to our attention by Radley Balko, author of Rise of the Warrior Cop, and now a writer for the Washington Post. I have highlighted Mr. Balko’s excellent work in the past, most recently last summer in my article: There are Over 50,000 SWAT Team Raids Annually in America, which you should definitely go back and read.

In his article for the Washington Post, Radley writes:

Watch this video, taken from a police raid in Des Moines, Iowa. Send it to some people. When critics (like me) warn about the dangers of police militarization, this is what we’re talking about. You’ll see the raid team, dressed in battle-dress uniforms, helmets and face-covering balaclava hoods take down the family’s door with a battering ram. You’ll see them storm the home with ballistics shields, guns at the ready. More troubling still, you’ll see not one but two officers attempt to prevent the family from having an independent record of the raid, one by destroying a surveillance camera, another by blocking another camera’s lens.

Now here’s the video. Brace yourself, this is extraordinarily disturbing and pathetic behavior:

Radley continues:

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://ift.tt/1fR0Gzp
via IFTTT

The Internet is Full of Cool Things, Part 19,354: NFL Helmets Redone in Star Wars Universe

So this has been
around at least since 2013, but what can I tell you? Ferglutz
you, bub, my hyperspatial ramblings ain’t what they used to be.

Here are John Raya’s reworking of NFL franchises as if they
existed in the Star Wars universe. Bonus points on the
Greedos’ helmet, for the non-infinite regress on the helmet worn by
the figure pictured on the helmet (my head hurts), a defining
attribute of the old Dolphins helmet (in which the Dolphin wore a
helmet whose logo
was a giant M
). 

Go here for
the AFC
and here for
the NFC
. And yes,
there’s a team
that involves Jar Jar Binks’ grim visage.

For more work by Raya, go here.

Tip via Tony Pierce’s great Twitter feed.

We’ve become jaded to the immense offerings on the Internet. I
think it’s a worthwhile pursuit to pause a second and point out
whenever we find cool, weird, useless, and fun stuff online. Reason
has been beating the drum about “cultural proliferation” for years
now, and for good reason: We live in an age in which it’s
easier than ever for people to make and consume whatever they want
in ever-more-varied circumstances
. That’s a real flowering of
self-expression and freedom.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kcSjSJ
via IFTTT

British Spies Use Anonymous-Style Tactics Against Anonymous

Gabriella Coleman
writes
:

We are the government. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.The
latest Snowden-related revelation
is that Britain’s Government
Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) proactively targeted the
communications infrastructure used by the online activist
collective known as Anonymous.


Specifically
, they implemented distributed denial of service
(DDoS) attacks on the internet relay chat (IRC) rooms used by
Anonymous. They also implanted malware to out the personal identity
details of specific participants. And while we only know for sure
that the U.K.’s GCHQ and secret spy unit known as the “Joint Threat
Research Intelligence Group” (JTRIG) launched these attacks in an
operation called “Rolling Thunder,” the U.S.’ NSA was likely aware
of what they were doing because the British intelligence agents
presented their program interventions at the NSA conference SIGDEV
in 2012. (Not to mention the two agencies sharing
close ties
in general.)

Whether you agree with the activities of Anonymous or not — which
have included everything from supporting the Arab Spring protests
to DDoSing copyright organizations to doxing child pornography site
users — the salient point is that democratic governments now seem
to be using their very tactics against them.

The key difference, however, is that while those involved in
Anonymous can and have faced their day in court for those tactics,
the British government has not. When Anonymous engages in
lawbreaking, they are always taking a huge risk in doing so. But
with unlimited resources and no oversight, organizations like the
GCHQ (and theoretically the NSA) can do as they
please.

Read the rest
here
. Read Coleman’s Reason article “Code Is Speech”
here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kToB37
via IFTTT

Stocks Collapse To Fresh 2014 Lows

Bad (ADP) news was good news but good (ISM Service) news is devastating and stocks are collapsing to fresh 2014 lows this morning as high-beta hope trades unwind en masse. The small-cap Russell is underperforming. All indices are now notably negative from the December taper. The Dow is down 7.4% in 2014! VIX is back over 20.5% 

 

An ugly year so far…


 

All red from the Taper…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1c3MxLa Tyler Durden

Citi, Goldman FX Heads Leaving In “Entirely Unrelated To FX Probe” Departures

When Reuters reported earlier today that Anil Prasad, the global head of foreign exchange at Citigroup, the world’s second largest currency trader, is leaving the bank, our ears perked up. The reason is the news overnight that according to the British financial watchdog, Martin Wheatley, the allegations for FX manipulation, “are every bit as bad as they have been with Libor” which supposedly means they are taking them seriously. Could this departure have anything to do with a probe that has already snared head FX trades at JPM, Deutsche and countless other banks? Well, Reuters promptly clarified that Prasad’s departure is not related to the global investigation into allegations of currency market manipulation, a source familiar with the matter said. “Anil’s decision is his own and entirely unrelated to the on-going FX investigations,” the source said.

So we had little reason to believe that Prasad’s departure is tied to the probe… Until we read this:

  • GOLDMAN SACHS HEAD OF FX TRADING STEVEN CHO TO LEAVE, DJ SAYS

Specifically, Cho was the global head of spot and forward FX trading.

And right on its heels, this:

  • LAWSKY SAID TO OPEN CURRENCY PROBE OF MORE THAN ONE DOZEN BANKS
  • LAWSKY SEEKING DOCUMENTS FROM BANKS INCLUDING DEUTSCHE BANK, GOLDMAN SACHS, BARCLAYS, CREDIT SUISSE-SOURCE
  • BANKS IN LAWSKY PROBE INCLUDE LLOYDS, STANDARD CHARTERED, SOCIETE GENERALE, RBS-SOURCE

And while we are willing to believe for now that these two shocking top-level departures by the key FX traders at the two most important banks have nothing to do with such chat rooms as the “The Cartel,” “The Bandits’ Club,” “One Team, One Dream” and “The Mafia”, we sadly have our doubts.We will reserve judgment until the final Lawsky report is released of course.

One thing is certain: manipulating the USDJPY and its most important derivative: the S&P 500, suddenly became much more difficult.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1kcNtF3 Tyler Durden

Citi, Goldman FX Heads Leaving In "Entirely Unrelated To FX Probe" Departures

When Reuters reported earlier today that Anil Prasad, the global head of foreign exchange at Citigroup, the world’s second largest currency trader, is leaving the bank, our ears perked up. The reason is the news overnight that according to the British financial watchdog, Martin Wheatley, the allegations for FX manipulation, “are every bit as bad as they have been with Libor” which supposedly means they are taking them seriously. Could this departure have anything to do with a probe that has already snared head FX trades at JPM, Deutsche and countless other banks? Well, Reuters promptly clarified that Prasad’s departure is not related to the global investigation into allegations of currency market manipulation, a source familiar with the matter said. “Anil’s decision is his own and entirely unrelated to the on-going FX investigations,” the source said.

So we had little reason to believe that Prasad’s departure is tied to the probe… Until we read this:

  • GOLDMAN SACHS HEAD OF FX TRADING STEVEN CHO TO LEAVE, DJ SAYS

Specifically, Cho was the global head of spot and forward FX trading.

And right on its heels, this:

  • LAWSKY SAID TO OPEN CURRENCY PROBE OF MORE THAN ONE DOZEN BANKS
  • LAWSKY SEEKING DOCUMENTS FROM BANKS INCLUDING DEUTSCHE BANK, GOLDMAN SACHS, BARCLAYS, CREDIT SUISSE-SOURCE
  • BANKS IN LAWSKY PROBE INCLUDE LLOYDS, STANDARD CHARTERED, SOCIETE GENERALE, RBS-SOURCE

And while we are willing to believe for now that these two shocking top-level departures by the key FX traders at the two most important banks have nothing to do with such chat rooms as the “The Cartel,” “The Bandits’ Club,” “One Team, One Dream” and “The Mafia”, we sadly have our doubts.We will reserve judgment until the final Lawsky report is released of course.

One thing is certain: manipulating the USDJPY and its most important derivative: the S&P 500, suddenly became much more difficult.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1kcNtF3 Tyler Durden

UN Report Details Abuse of Children By Rebels and Government Forces in Syria

A United Nations report
released online yesterday highlights the awful suffering that
children in Syria have endured throughout that country’s ongoing
civil war. Writing in the report, U.N. Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon
said
, “The suffering endured by the children in the Syrian Arab
Republic since the outset of the conflict, as documented in this
report, is unspeakable and unacceptable.”

The report details how government forces have been torturing
children allegedly associated with rebel groups:

Multiple accounts of children and adult witnesses indicate that
the majority of children were held in the same cells as
adults, and that children as young as 11 years old suffered
ill treatment and acts tantamount to torture to extract confessions
or humiliate them or to pressure a relative to surrender or
confess. Ill treatment and acts tantamount to torture
reportedly included beatings with metal cables, whips
and wooden and metal batons; electric shocks, including to the
genitals; the ripping out of fingernails and toenails; sexual
violence, including rape or threats of rape; mock executions;
cigarette burns; sleep deprivation; solitary confinement; and
exposure to the torture of relatives. Reports indicate that
children were also suspended from walls or ceilings by their
wrists or other limbs, were forced to put their head, neck and
legs through a tire while being beaten, and were tied to a board
and beaten.

The U.N. report is the latest to exposes the extent of the Assad
regime’s brutality. Last month,
a report
was released detailing the slaughter of thousands of
detainees carried out by government forces.

While the scale of the Assad regime’s barbarism is always worth
highlighting, it should be noted that the U.N. report also mentions
that rebels associated with the Western-backed Free Syrian Army
(FSA) have been recruiting children to be used in combat. The FSA
does not have children recruitment as a policy, but some boys feel
pressured to join the fight against Assad:

The FSA Code of Conduct of August 2012 did not mention or
prohibit the recruitment and use of children. However, monitoring
and verification activities indicated that it was not conducted as
a policy or systematically. Interviews with children and their
parents indicated that the loss of parents and relatives, political
mobilization and peer pressure from families and communities,
contributed to the involvement of children with FSA-affiliated
groups. Many boys stated that they felt it was their duty to join
the opposition.

More from the report on the FSA’s recruitment:

13. Boys aged 12 to 17 years were trained, armed and used as
combatants or to man checkpoints. For instance, a 15-year-old
boy reported having been recruited in April 2012 by FSA in
Tall Kalakh (Tartus governorate), and having participated
in military operations.

The report also mentions reports of Syrian government forces
recruiting child soldiers:

The United Nations did not receive reports of children having
been formally recruited by Government forces. However, Government
forces, including the Shabiha militia and the popular
committees/National Defence Forces, reportedly intimidated and
seized young males, including those under the age of 18, to join
their ranks at checkpoints and during raids in pro-Government and
contested areas. In one instance in July 2012, a man reported to
the United Nations that the Syrian Armed Forces had tried to
recruit his 16-year-old son while they were passing a checkpoint in
Deir ez-Zor governorate.

The FSA is not the only rebel group mentioned in the report. The
report refers to rebel groups, such as the jihadist group Jabhat
al-Nusra, which have allegedly killed children. The report claims
that “Armed opposition groups” summarily execute children.

28. Children were the victims of mass killings in Latakia
governorate that were committed by a coalition of armed opposition
groups allegedly including Ahrar al-Sham, ISIS, Jabhat al-Nusra,
Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar and Suqour al-Izz during the
so-called Barouda offensive against Alawite villages on 4 August
2013. At least 18 children, including boys and girls under the age
of 10, were killed and an unknown number of children were maimed.
Most children were shot in their houses or while trying to flee
with family members. In some instances, civilians reported that
armed opposition groups tried to relocate civilians before
launching operations. In most incidents, however, FSA-affiliated
and other armed groups conducted military operations in densely
populated areas, leading to the displacement and civilian
casualties, including children. Armed opposition groups reportedly
used snipers, mortars, rockets and improvised explosive devices in
residential areas.

29. Armed opposition groups also engaged in the summary
execution of children. Lack of access, including for security
reasons, has prevented the United Nations from systematic
documentation. Trends are believed to be much higher than the
number of recorded cases. For instance, in 2011 in Damascus
governorate, FSA elements reportedly killed a 16-year-old boy, who
had allegedly been coerced to work with the Government when his
father was detained by Government forces. The United Nations also
received reports of children killed by Jabhat al-Nusra, including,
a 16-year-old boy who was shot dead in April 2013 in Al Hassakeh
governorate. Also in Al Hassakeh governorate, a 14-year-old boy was
reportedly shot dead by elements of Syrian Kurdish armed groups
associated with PYD during a demonstration of another Kurdish
faction.

Unsurprisingly, the first round of peace talks in Switzerland
between the Syrian government and some opposition representatives

did not amount to much
. As the war in Syria goes on and
interventionists continue to make the case for increased foreign
involvement in the war it is worth bearing the recent U.N. report
in mind. As awful as the Assad regime is, opposition groups are
also responsible for abuses.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1e3tGzm
via IFTTT

The GOP’s Suicide Pact on Immigration

By many accounts, the
Republican leadership (at least in the House, where Speaker John
Boehner bestrides the chamber like a leather-skinned Colossus), is
working to pull together some sort of “immigration reform” that
will doubtless go poorly. Already one wing of the GOP is clamoring
that “Amnesty=Suicide” and the other is…saying that newcomers are
welcome but only after we finish building a 10,000-foot-tall fence
that stretches along the coast from San Diego to Boston’s Logan
Airport.


In my latest Daily Beast col
, I suggest that, if the
GOP is actually serious about its limited-government rhetoric, it
should use the immigration issue as a way to talk about reducing
the size, scope, and spending of the federal government –
especially on welfare programs for the native-born folks who have
become increasingly dependent on such handouts since George W. Bush
increased spending on food stamps, disability claims, and unfunded
extensions of long-term unemployment benefits.


Snippets:

Republicans insist that the federal government is too
inefficient and incompetent to deliver the mail or to oversee
health care, but it’s nonetheless qualified to police thousands of
miles of borders and run employment checks on hundreds of millions
of workers? Come on guys, get your story straight.

The simple fact, one that Republicans should embrace, is that
governments don’t really control aggregate immigration flows any
more than they control aggregate consumer demand. Immigration is
the result of far larger forces than even totalitarian governments
can control, including economic opportunity in the destination
country and material conditions in the home country….

In late 2008 and early 2009 – a period in which spending
authority was shared by Presidents Bush and Obama – real federal
outlays shot up to around
$10,000 per capita
 and show no signs of coming down
anytime soon. Indeed, budget deals these days seem to be little
more than bi-partisan raids on proposed spending reductions such as
the sequester.

If Republicans are really the party of free trade and limited
government – and if they really believe in American exceptionalism
and the lure of the Shining City Upon a Hill – they’ll take this
opportunity to welcome immigrants while rolling back the welfare
state.


Read the whole thing.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kcLdh5
via IFTTT

The GOP's Suicide Pact on Immigration

By many accounts, the
Republican leadership (at least in the House, where Speaker John
Boehner bestrides the chamber like a leather-skinned Colossus), is
working to pull together some sort of “immigration reform” that
will doubtless go poorly. Already one wing of the GOP is clamoring
that “Amnesty=Suicide” and the other is…saying that newcomers are
welcome but only after we finish building a 10,000-foot-tall fence
that stretches along the coast from San Diego to Boston’s Logan
Airport.


In my latest Daily Beast col
, I suggest that, if the
GOP is actually serious about its limited-government rhetoric, it
should use the immigration issue as a way to talk about reducing
the size, scope, and spending of the federal government –
especially on welfare programs for the native-born folks who have
become increasingly dependent on such handouts since George W. Bush
increased spending on food stamps, disability claims, and unfunded
extensions of long-term unemployment benefits.


Snippets:

Republicans insist that the federal government is too
inefficient and incompetent to deliver the mail or to oversee
health care, but it’s nonetheless qualified to police thousands of
miles of borders and run employment checks on hundreds of millions
of workers? Come on guys, get your story straight.

The simple fact, one that Republicans should embrace, is that
governments don’t really control aggregate immigration flows any
more than they control aggregate consumer demand. Immigration is
the result of far larger forces than even totalitarian governments
can control, including economic opportunity in the destination
country and material conditions in the home country….

In late 2008 and early 2009 – a period in which spending
authority was shared by Presidents Bush and Obama – real federal
outlays shot up to around
$10,000 per capita
 and show no signs of coming down
anytime soon. Indeed, budget deals these days seem to be little
more than bi-partisan raids on proposed spending reductions such as
the sequester.

If Republicans are really the party of free trade and limited
government – and if they really believe in American exceptionalism
and the lure of the Shining City Upon a Hill – they’ll take this
opportunity to welcome immigrants while rolling back the welfare
state.


Read the whole thing.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kcLdh5
via IFTTT