This Time, Boehner “Capitulates” Early On Debt Ceiling

Apparently squeezed by an internal party split, The Hill reports that House Republican leaders have concluded that they cannot pass an increase in the debt ceiling without help from Democrats, abandoning plans to tie legislation either to ObamaCare or the Keystone pipeline. Having initially planned on these negotiation points, Boehner discovered he would not have enough votes to pass the bill… and folded. That left Republican leaders with no clear alternative to addressing the debt limit, which, as we noted is rapidly approaching at the end of February, as a combination of Republicans and Democrats will be needed to get a debt-limit boost through the House – leaving some Reps describing a clean debt-ceiling bill as "Capitulation."

 

Via The Hill,

 

The central question will be whether Democrats hold firm on their stance that no extraneous provisions can be attached to a debt-limit boost, or whether Republicans will be able to extract any modest concessions in exchange for a borrowing boost. So far, Democrats and the White House have been publicly adamant about only accepting a "clean" increase.

 

Conservatives have said in recent days they would oppose a clean increase, but several seemed increasingly resigned to seeing a clean bill passed with Democratic help.

 

A clean debt-ceiling [bill] would not garner my vote, but if the House leadership chooses to go that route and believes that’s in the best interests of the country and they don’t need my vote to accomplish that, I’m OK with that,” Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said Tuesday.

 

 

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) reiterated his opinion that the GOP should pass a clean bill and let Democrats "own it," while Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) said the party should keep searching for a proposal to attach to the measure.

 

"I don’t advocate some sort of scorched earth process, but I do advocate coming up with some common sense structural reforms or specific entitlement reforms that don’t effect program benefits immediately," Barton said.

 

"A clean debt ceiling I think is capitulation," he added, "and I didn’t get elected by the 6th district of Texas to come here to Washington and capitulate."

 

Republican leaders have spent the past several days taking the temperature of their rank-and-file, searching for a way to pass a debt-limit bill with only GOP support.

 

 

But neither plan gained momentum in the last several days, leaving Republicans at an impasse.

And as we noted here, the X-Date is rapidly approaching…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1isWQ0k Tyler Durden

This Time, Boehner "Capitulates" Early On Debt Ceiling

Apparently squeezed by an internal party split, The Hill reports that House Republican leaders have concluded that they cannot pass an increase in the debt ceiling without help from Democrats, abandoning plans to tie legislation either to ObamaCare or the Keystone pipeline. Having initially planned on these negotiation points, Boehner discovered he would not have enough votes to pass the bill… and folded. That left Republican leaders with no clear alternative to addressing the debt limit, which, as we noted is rapidly approaching at the end of February, as a combination of Republicans and Democrats will be needed to get a debt-limit boost through the House – leaving some Reps describing a clean debt-ceiling bill as "Capitulation."

 

Via The Hill,

 

The central question will be whether Democrats hold firm on their stance that no extraneous provisions can be attached to a debt-limit boost, or whether Republicans will be able to extract any modest concessions in exchange for a borrowing boost. So far, Democrats and the White House have been publicly adamant about only accepting a "clean" increase.

 

Conservatives have said in recent days they would oppose a clean increase, but several seemed increasingly resigned to seeing a clean bill passed with Democratic help.

 

A clean debt-ceiling [bill] would not garner my vote, but if the House leadership chooses to go that route and believes that’s in the best interests of the country and they don’t need my vote to accomplish that, I’m OK with that,” Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said Tuesday.

 

 

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) reiterated his opinion that the GOP should pass a clean bill and let Democrats "own it," while Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) said the party should keep searching for a proposal to attach to the measure.

 

"I don’t advocate some sort of scorched earth process, but I do advocate coming up with some common sense structural reforms or specific entitlement reforms that don’t effect program benefits immediately," Barton said.

 

"A clean debt ceiling I think is capitulation," he added, "and I didn’t get elected by the 6th district of Texas to come here to Washington and capitulate."

 

Republican leaders have spent the past several days taking the temperature of their rank-and-file, searching for a way to pass a debt-limit bill with only GOP support.

 

 

But neither plan gained momentum in the last several days, leaving Republicans at an impasse.

And as we noted here, the X-Date is rapidly approaching…


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1isWQ0k Tyler Durden

Wisconsin Middle School Forces Children to Play “Cross the Line” Game – Asks Kids if Parents are Alcoholics

Just in case you had any lingering doubt about the uselessness of many U.S. public schools, I bring to you Marinette Middle School. Yes, the administrators of this school thought it would be a fantastic idea to gather sixth graders around and ask them in front of all their classmates questions like; if their parents are alcoholics, use drugs or are divorced.

This story emerge only a week after I published the very disturbing article: Lunches Seized and Tossed in Trash at Salt Lake City Elementary School for Kids with Unpaid Balances.

Now, from local station NBC26 we discover that:

MARINETTE, Wis. — Several parents with students attending Marinette Middle School are outraged over a recent game that they say is inappropriate and leads to bullying.

The parents tell NBC26 school leaders forced their kids to play the game called ‘Cross the Line’ which calls on the students to reveal personal information about themselves and their families.

“Those are questions that no child should have to answer,” said Janette Sadowski, a parent of a 6th grader. 

She said her daughter chose not to play, and was threatened with an in-school suspension.

Classy. It seems the school system is teaching the small slaves to behave and listen to irrational orders at a young age

“She stood her ground, half her class stood their ground,” said Sadowski.

Students line up and answer questions by taking a step forward. The Parents say it’s the nature of the questions that has them upset. Some ask the group if they’ve experienced suicidal thoughts and if they feel one or both of their parents are alcoholics.

In a statement from the Marinette Middle School Principal, Shawn Limberg, it says students had the choice to participate, and this was part of a bullying prevention program. Limberg said the intent was to “build stronger, more respectful relationships among students.”

Right you moron, because exposing to the entire class that a child’s parents are drunks is going to reduce bullying. Yes, these are the people “educating” your children.

Full article here.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1LefuVV2eCnW9VKjJGJzgZWa9vHg7Rc3r1

 Follow me on Twitter.

Wisconsin Middle School Forces Children to Play “Cross the Line” Game – Asks Kids if Parents are Alcoholics originally appeared on A Lightning War for Liberty on February 5, 2014.

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://ift.tt/1kdSAVm
via IFTTT

Guest Post: Russia’s Potemkin Olympic Village

With reporters stunned by Sochi’s unreadiness and athletes now quitting individual events on the lack of preparedness of the snow, the Winter Olympics in Russia is off to a less than stellar start. The last time Russia hosted the Olympics – the 1980 Summer Games in Moscow – the Soviet Union was a superpower, stagnant but stable. Not so today, notes Nina Khruschcheva; Putin’s Russia is weak, tawdry, and corrupt – and underserving as an Olympic host. The atmosphere surrounding the Sochi Games reflects many of Russia’s worst traits. In the immortal words of former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, describing the country’s economic transition of the 1990’s: “We hoped for the best, but things turned out as usual.”

 

Authored by Nina Khruscheva, originally posted at Project Syndicate,

Remember the year 2007? Russia was starting to look like a world power again. Its economy was growing at a record 8.5% annual rate. Political life had stabilized. Support for President Vladimir Putin was stratospheric. The decade-long Chechen rebellion seemed to have been suppressed. And, to top it off, the International Olympic Committee awarded the 2014 Winter Games to Russia’s Black Sea resort, Sochi.

In many respects, it was a strange choice of venue: sunny Sochi has beautiful mountains but little or no snow. It is also 850 miles south of Moscow, with few direct flights from Europe, while the trip from the United States can involve up to four legs.

But in 2007, Russians were becoming more optimistic about their future. Addressing the Olympic Committee, Putin argued that awarding Russia the Games would not only allow it to showcase its post-Soviet achievements; it would also help the country through its political and economic transition. Nothing seemed too difficult for Putin, even mouthing unnecessary democratic platitudes for an Olympic committee whose members had already awarded the 2008 Summer Olympics to Beijing.

But, once construction got underway, the realities of modern Russia could not be so easily hidden. The colossal project, which cost more than $50 billion – more than all previous Winter Olympics combined – was expected to turn Sochi into a sporting paradise, packed with arenas and a new airport. Instead, corruption and construction accidents have plagued preparations, with hotels still unfinished just days before the opening ceremony.

Delay and waste are common in Olympic preparations (Greece in 2004 is an obvious example, and Brazil in 2016 appears to be experiencing similar problems). But Russia is proving to be an unsuitable host for other reasons.

For starters, there are concerns about Putin’s own political legitimacy. His controversial and unconstitutional re-election to a third presidential term was condemned internationally and triggered anti-government protests across Russia.

Putin responded to those he considers political enemies by arresting and jailing protesters, including the all-girl rock band Pussy Riot, following “show trials” (with the Olympics approaching, there have been recent “show pardons”). Such episodes have contributed to a general air of intolerance across Russia, fueled in no small part by Kremlin-incited chauvinism. A government sponsored anti-gay propaganda law, which indiscriminately criminalizes same-sex couples, has caused outrage abroad. Local activists have even advised gay athletes not to display signs of their sexual orientation while in Russia.

Similarly, though the Olympics should be an occasion for national pride, foreign – and in particular American – athletes have been told to avoid showing their team colors when outside the grounds. In fact, they have been warned not to wander beyond Sochi’s “ring of steel” security perimeter and the watchful gaze of black-and-gray-clad police officers, even though Olympians typically like to explore local sights.

None of this engenders a sense of Olympic solidarity and international friendship. And it gets worse. The authorities must also contend with threats from Islamist insurgents from Chechnya, who are now operating in other North Caucasian republics, a mere 200 miles from Sochi. The “black widows” – wives of Islamist fighters killed in the Kremlin’s “pacification” campaign – are believed to be preparing retaliatory suicide missions at airports, train stations, and on buses.

The last time Russia hosted the Olympics – the 1980 Summer Games in Moscow – the US and its allies staged a boycott in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. And yet the Soviet Union was a superpower, stagnant but stable. Its totalitarian secrecy, gargantuan military-industrial complex, ever-present KGB handlers, and apparent disdain for material comforts (at least for ordinary Russians) gave the Communist hegemon a perverse mystique that made even a simple visit to Red Square a trip to remember. However much the country was hated or feared, one could not deny that is was a major player on the world stage.

Not so today. Putin’s Russia is weak, tawdry, and corrupt – and underserving as an Olympic host. The atmosphere surrounding the Sochi Games reflects many of Russia’s worst traits. In the immortal words of former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, describing the country’s economic transition of the 1990’s: “We hoped for the best, but things turned out as usual.”

Even assuming that the Sochi Games pass off successfully, and that, despite the security restrictions and official bigotry, athletes and visitors enjoy their stay, will Russia’s brief display of national pride really be worth the financial and political cost? Or will Russians wake up six months from now and say, “Yes, our country has a fancy ski resort – at the beach.”


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1eqXj40 Tyler Durden

2014 OUTLOOK: CAN YOU HEAR THE POPPING SOUNDS?

  -View online -Forward

image

TedBits Newsletter February 5, 2014 

 
 

2014 OUTLOOK: Can You Hear the Popping Sounds?


The Tides in have turned watch out below!
Opening volleys of currency wars
Trial and tribulations of CHINESE mandarins
The State of STOCKS

Once again the smell of NAPALM is in the air.  Reversals in liquidity and Massive markets reaction to PUNY emerging market outflows PROBABLY signals the next waves of insolvencies are STRIKING as I write this.  Most main stream economists, banksters, brokers, governments and public servants are calling for continued recovery in developed world economies; to me it APPEARS we just saw the PEAK.

As Warren Buffet once said “When the tides go out we find out who has been swimming naked” and we are about to see this statement in ACTION!!!

Now the weakest hands (IN AT THE TOP) are set for the firecrackers they call developed world stocks and UBER LEVERAGED financial assets to IMPLODE, blowing massive holes in their portfolios and lives, sparking a momentum driven liquidation as overleveraged players meet their WATERLOO as the leverage which is epidemic in the FINANCIAL Systems and their investment positions FAILS.  Most people live in the matrix and cannot SEE as the media and governments in which they have placed their trust BLACK OUT critical issues from their eyes, ears and MINDS.  This episode is no different.  They are in for a surprise.

I believe Janet Yellen is being met at the door as she assumes control of the central bank to the world by the next CRISIS for the Global financial systems and economies.  Every Fed chief in the last 60 years has been subjected to trial by FIRE; hers may be arriving before she does.  LET ME BE CLEAR: the GLOBAL financial system and financialized economies CANNOT withstand ANY TIGHTENING and a lot is being SERVED UP NOW!   The reason the rout did not start in December is that the actual taper did not start till now.

These challenges include Dodd Frank (stealth political directed tightening and politically directed lending to favored constituents: students, US government and the housing industry to name a few), the taper, and the emerging markets convulsions as investment flows reverse.  Take a look at the EM rout which has just unfolded since December’s taper announcement.

This rout has just BEGUN, as the outflows have been PUNY compared the total FDI ($4Trillion foreign direct investment) since 2008.  Check out this chart from John Mauldin’s latest Missive (do not miss this it is one of his best ever, http://ift.tt/LWyHkZ )

This run has barely begun; the first country to set up capital controls will IGNITE the BOMB!

The beginning of the proverbial run on the bank of the emerging world actually began back in May when Bernanke floated his HOT AIR TRIAL balloon of the TAPER. The reaction at that time was a DOUBLING of US interest rates on just the thought of it.  The Fed did a quick climb-down then, what will happen now?

Most thought dollar and euro reserves where adequate compared to 1998 crisis.  Yes, if the problem was the SAME size as it was at that time.  NO, as the external investments in their countries NOW DWARFS what it was then.  MANY ARE DEPENDANT on FDI to fund government consumption and hot money propped up asset markets.

Add to this China’s MANDARINS desperate attempt to pull their financial system back from the MOUNTAINS of DEBT that they have created since 2007.  They are truly sitting on a financial system extinction event if this mountain of new lending GOES BAD (hint, it already has it just hasn’t been announced yet). 

Author’s Note:  In my opinion the greatest manmade disaster and OPPORTUNITY in history is unfolding in every corner of the world.  Are you diversified or operating with EYES WIDE SHUT?  Are you prepared to turn it into opportunity by properly diversifying your portfolio?  Adding absolute return investments which have the potential to thrive (up and down markets) regardless of what unfolds economically?  Hedging the printing presses impact on your paper money?  This is what I do for investors; help them diversify into investments which are created to potentially thrive in the storm.  For a personal consultation with me CLICK HERE!

The Chinese government has BANNED the words: CREDIT CRUNCH, and it is being reported many cash transfers have been HALTED (not confirmed). 
Authors Note: The financial and personal destruction and draining of liquidity (huge money now redirected to healthcare that used to be for personal consumption for those earning over $45,000) created by the Affordable care act aka Ob@m@c@re  and expanded Chinese analysis will be covered in a commentary’s later in this series, subscribe for free CLICK HERE

Since 2009, CREDIT in China has compounded at almost 30% plus per year and fueled growth of about 8%.  Once again, debt MASQUERADING as GROWTH.  The Bernanke Fed created the bombs with QE and lit the fuse as he exited with the TAPER in place.  Now we will see if they can extinguish the fuse BEFORE the EXPLOSION.  It appears to be too late as I will ILLUSTRATE.  The dominoes are already in motion.

Yellen is joined in this battle by the Peoples bank of China (central bank of china) which is trying to engineer a soft landing to the explosive credit bubbles which have formed there since 2008.  Credit in China has grown from 8 trillion dollars to over 24 TRILLION in just 5 short years (chart courtesy of www.zerohedge.com ): 

It is estimated that AT LEAST 15% of this debt is NO GOOD (spent on consumption, and fueled massive capital flight of NEWLY MINTED CHINESE MILLIONAIRES) and that almost 45% of it MUST ROLL OVER in 2014.  Can it do so without triggering a Lehman moment?  Don’t bet on it!  This will be covered in detail in a future edition of TedBits. Subscribe for free CLICK HERE

The world’s two largest economies are NOW highly correlated to one another, and being challenged SIMULTANEOUSLY.   The next episode of the Global financial crisis is set to begin.  Globally tightening cycles have begun and NOMINAL fragile economic recoveries are being aborted.  I say nominal because there is no REAL growth in the developed world, only growth in piles of paper and debt-fueled consumption called growth.
Malinvestments (stocks, bonds, real estate which yield virtually nothing) have now accumulated for YEARS.  Investors (banks, institutions, pension funds, etc.) of all stripes are out on a limb in investments which yield little or nothing and they are being SAWED off.   Since Quantitative easing began in 2008, correlations in many asset classes have gone to 1!  They will crater the same way when the BIG WAVE of insolvency hits again.  It is not “if” it is “when”….

These investments involve ungodly amounts of leverage to create YIELD which is no longer available to the common man because of the 5 years of FINANCIAL REPRESSION.  Just the absence or reduction in available leverage is the same as a tightening, and paper fueled growth cannot continue to expand.

“Financial repression is any of the measures that governments employ to channel funds to themselves, their financial systems, and politically connected corporations, that, in a deregulated market (unmanipulated by central and commercial banks), would go elsewhere. Financial repression can be particularly effective at liquidating debt”    – Wikipedia

And transferring income to themselves that should belong to the private sector savers I would add.  Interest rates have now been at ZERO for over 5 years and assets that really yield anything are PRICED for perfection.  This chart by www.dshort.com illustrates an economy where money is FREE for the most connected system insiders (not you and me):

That is a picture of a US economy and financial system on life support since 2008.  It is dead, like a patient at the hospital kept alive by machines.  In this case, computers which can print money OUT OF THIN AIR to buy toxic FINANCIAL assets of all types to prop up insolvent banks and governments.

In the stock markets, the tea leaves are frightening to view, but a connect the dots moment has arrived for readers of this missive.  After last year’s melt up, courtesy of the feds, printing presses (one million million was printed or aka $1.02 TRILLION) fueled last year’s historic rise. The stock market run into the end of the year was nothing short of insane with major global macro BEARS, THROWING in the TOWEL signaling a top is at hand.

 Check this chart by Bianco research showing stock gains or losses with and without QE illustrating the CAUSE and effect of QE on and QE off:

Markets have only risen when the printing presses are ENGAGED. Just as in previously illustrated episodes, it’s now BOMBS AWAY!  Only 3 times in the last 113 years have valuations been higher and all were preludes to a CRASH, once again courtesy of www.dshort.com:

Bullish sentiment is at 3 decade highs and bearish sentiment is at 3 decade lows:

Looking at the 10 greatest BULL markets in the S&P 500 since 1929, we get a good hint of what the comparisons are of previous bull markets (courtesy of Global money trends and Gary Dorsch).

Let’s review: the current bull is the 4th best ALL TIME, the average is 55 month/this one is now 59 months – Just 2½  months shy of the 3rd longest in history.  Look at the 3 that are greater, and compare it to the credit growth we have seen leading to this peak.  Now let’s look at the S&P 500 versus Bonds on a valuation basis since the secular BEAR market in stock began in 2000 (courtesy of http://ift.tt/1kdLRuK I recommend this highly):

 

OUCH, stock valuations versus the 10 year note at highs that preceded every major CRASH in the last 14 years.  Is past prologue?

DO YOU REALLY THINK THE MAJORITY OF INVESTORS ARE ALL GOING TO PROFIT FROM HERE?  There is something called the 20/80 rule: 20% of the investors get 80% of the gains while the other 80% get to other 20%.  In my opinion, this time will be no different.  There is a lot of pain between here and there.  Margin debt is at the HIGHEST LEVELS IN HISTORY BY FAR (chart courtesy of Lance Roberts www.stawealth.com) while net credit is at ALL TIME LOWS:

Notice net credit balance at ALL TIME LOWS with Margin at BIG ALL TIME HIGHS, where is the money going to come from to fuel the move upward from here?  I believe that surge in margin is the public arriving in DROVES.  And now Lance overlays the S&P 500 with the margin picture:

When this margin turns lower, LOOK OUT BELOW (CASCADING MARGIN CALL LOOM).  The STOCK market bull is as ripe as a 7 day old banana.  Look CAREFULLY at this chart of the S&P 500 by Dr. John Hussman overlaid with his notes/analysis:

This is an illustration of the MADNESS of CROWDS and INSANITY. His referral to fasby 157 was the catalyst for the launch off the 2009 lows when “mark to myth” of financial assets was restored and “mark to market” valuations BURIED, allowing financial system insolvency to be OFFICIALLY COVERED UP.  OVERT Regulatory approved INSOLVENCY of the financial systems as it is up to today.

In terms of Fibonacci time frames, between crashes it was 13 years between 1987 and 2000.  The time between 2000 and 2008 was 8 years, a Fibonacci time period of about 62%.  If we use that SAME Fibonacci timeframe from 2008, the next crash is set for about the 5 year anniversary this fall.

And a wolf wave (see the mega phone formation in the earnings chart?) in EARNINGS is due to BOTTOM in late 2013 or early 2014.  Notice how this wolf wave began at about the time of Bretton Woods II in 1971?   This wolf wave is a product of Bretton Wood II as the financialization of the economy BEGAN at that time.  Now GROWTH only comes from FIAT MONEY illusions, the REAL economy in flyover country has been KILLED and HOLLOWED OUT by corrupt public servants, crony capitalist companies and the beast called the FEDERAL RESERVE and banking systems!

WOLVES EAT THINGS and this one will too.  This is a wave of instability with money and credit growth increasing and decreasing as money and credit creation is either too hot or too cold.  Will we decline to the inner wolf wave or the outer one?  Will the predictive ability of this chart signal the near future or FAIL? 

I used this chart in commentary in March 2007 to predict a crash into the 2008 elections.  I am doing so again today with a crash into the 2014 elections accompanied with a crash in the economy.  With a top already in place or before MAY.  MAKE a NOTE of it!

There has been virtually no CORPORATE revenue growth for over a year.  Earnings growth has been courtesy cost cutting, MASSIVE buybacks, refinancing debt at low interest rates and a virtual abandonment of CAPEX investment for the five years since 2008.  Spawning the widest gap in corporate earnings over pay in HISTORY (courtesy of Lance Roberts of www.STAWEALTH.com):

Part of this divergence is because the LABOR participation rate has plummeted about 10% since the CHOSEN ONE ascended to power and implemented the CHICAGO way of doing things at the federal level.  He is not the champion of the poor he claims to be, he is their worst NIGHTMARE as his policies have DESTROYED THEM. 

This is why he can lead the something for nothing society HE has CREATED to eat the last vestiges of the private sector.  It is the democrat’s 2014 campaign theme.  Cannibalism of the worse sort as NO RECOVERY will be fathered from INSIDE WASHINGTON D.C. (district of corruption).  It will not come by bringing those that still have success down, by dividing the nation between have and have nots.  These are not solutions, they are RECIPES for disaster.

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ~ Henry Ford

In my opinion, the greatest manmade disaster and OPPORTUNITY in history is unfolding in every corner of the world.  Are you diversified or operating with EYES WIDE SHUT?  Are you prepared to turn it into opportunity by properly diversifying your portfolio?  Adding absolute return investments which have the potential to thrive (up and down markets) regardless of what unfolds economically?  Hedging the printing presses impact on your paper money?  This is what I do for investors; help them diversify into investments which are created to potentially thrive in the storm.  For a personal consultation with me CLICK HERE!

It will come only from the private sector and they have gone into hiding from his policies and minions.  The idea that Washington D.C. can guarantee your success is FALSE, only you can determine that.  Only something-for-nothings believe government can provide people with prosperity they must earn and toil for.

Just as they have destroyed the great state of ILLINOIS and city of CHICAGO, it is the government as mafia, preying on the very people they claim to protect.  The USEFUL IDIOTS who support him are VICTIMS of the policies he has IMPLEMENTED. Lambs for him to SLAUGHTER as he has buried them and their children’s futures in DEBT!

Just as Ronald Reagan once said: “the twelve most frightening words in the world are “I am here from the government and I am here to help”, no truer words have ever been spoken…  Government gone wild is the ROOT of the ECONOMIC problems not the solution to them.

An analogue to the 1970’s and another wolf wave as well can be seen in these charts by my good friend Garrett Jones:

For this DIAMOND to complete, we have a journey to touch the lower trend line of the Wolfe wave around 5500 today but by the time we arrive will be well below 4000.  Let’s look more closely at the 1973 diamond and how it resolved itself into the 1974 low and then today’s MEGA DIAMOND courtesy of Garrett Jones:

The picture on the left is the rally into the final high before the crash into the 1974 low.  Pay particular notice to the outside down bar that failed to test the top of the megaphone trend line.  Now to today’s analogue:

This is virtually identical to that previous period, only on a much LARGER SCALE, with the descent to the final low due to START NOW! Note Garret’s work showing the internal wave pattern by the yellow lines in both charts.  If correct, we should be headed to the bottom of the megaphone over the next year or two.

NOTICE the outside down bar is here as well (other outside down reversals on monthly’s: German Dax, Uk FTSE 100, Nasdaq, Dow transports, Russell 2000, Shanghai comp., Aussie Asx 200, Nikkei 225, and many more).  It is a deadly chorus of technical reversals. 

In closing, the cyclical bull markets off the 2009 lows are long in tooth, over loved, and printing press and plunge protection team DEPENDENT.

“The Fed is an agent of distortion. They have their fingers, their thumbs, on the scales of finance. To change the metaphor, we all live to a degree in a valuation hall of mirrors. Who knows what value is when the Fed fixes the determining interest rate to zero,”… “It strikes me that the Fed in substance, if not in name, is engaged in a massive experiment in price control,”   – James Grant, Grants interest rate observer

The next leg down in global stock markets looms as the TAPER, Dodd Frank (huge reductions in credit availability enshrined in LAW) and CHINA try to inch back from the precipice of previous credit EXCESSES. And this WAVE of INSOLVENCY is going to be a doozy in my opinion.   

I have tried to be exhaustive in my review of the stock , history and a wide variety of indicators which are singing from the same hymnals and I hope you heed the MESSAGES of the markets they contain.  The idea that an economic recovery can take place when markets are rushing lower is a challenging idea.  The most dangerous words in history, “It’s different this time” are about to BITE again as those with short memories get a HISTORY LESSON.
 
PLEASE KEEP IN MIND: This is the GREATEST OPPORTUNITY IN HISTORY in my OPINION.  This is not DOOM and GLOOM, it is a careful analysis of history and how it resolved itself in previous episodes of the types of insanities we are seeing today.  ALL Markets are more mispriced than at any time in my career due to the distortions of FIAT money and UNRESERVED credit and derivatives.  Volatility is OPPORTUNITY for the prepared investor.

In my opinion the greatest manmade disaster and OPPORTUNITY in history is unfolding in every corner of the world.  Are you diversified or operating with EYES WIDE SHUT?  Are you prepared to turn it into opportunity by properly diversifying your portfolio?  Adding absolute return investments which have the potential to thrive (up and down markets) regardless of what unfolds economically?  Hedging the printing presses impact on your paper money?  This is what I do for investors; help them diversify into investments which are created to potentially thrive in the storm.  For a personal consultation with me CLICK HERE!

The last secular bear market lasted from 1965 until 1982 or 17 years (diamond pattern), this one is now 14 years old and the midpoint low is not yet in place.  Look for it soon (1 to 2 years).

Globally, the powers that be are attempting to pull the punchbowl without triggering an economic and market crash.  Will they be successful?  Highly doubtful in my opinion.  I am an Austrian economist and highly respectful of HISTORY and Human behavior.  Quoting Von Mises:

"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved." – Ludwig von Mises

This is and remains the bottom line.  To me, everything is BAKED in the CAKE.  An explosion in suppressed volatility is at hand.

Tedbits is global Macro analysis PURELY through the AUSTRIAN lens and when this series concludes I will have extracted you from the MATRIX of UNREALITY and cut through the ILLUSIONS of the Keynesian world most people live in.  YOU will KNOW the truth and SEE the unfolding collapse of the developed world unmasked from political and monetary illusions.  Don’t miss this series as subscriptions are free CLICK HERE.
 
 
 
 

 


Authors note: Tedbits is global Macro analysis PURELY through the AUSTRIAN lens and when this “Pandora’s Box” series concludes I will have extracted you from the MATRIX of UNREALITY and cut through the ILLUSIONS of the Keynesian world most people live in.  YOU will KNOW the truth and SEE the unfolding collapse of the developed world unmasked from political and monetary illusions.  Don’t miss this series as subscriptions are free CLICK HERE.

In coming issues, I will be covering, stocks, bombs er bonds, something for nothing societies, energy and natural resources, commodities, precious metals and currencies, policies of insolvency, G-8 economies,  China, suppressed volatility, politically correct and practically incorrect economic stats, unmargined derivatives, financial repression, QE, demographics, debt, deflation, inflation, etc.  All black swans: which one will land first TRIGGERING the next CRISIS? In my opinion this is the greatest opportunity in history but you need a clear vision of it, don’t miss the next TedBits!  – CLICK HERE.


 
DISCLAIMER AND TERMS OF USE: While TedBits strives to present accurate and useful information, we make no guarantee of accuracy or completeness. All information and opinion expressed herein is subject to change without notice. Opinions and recommendations contained herein should not be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell any securities or commodities. Do not assume that any recommendations, insights, charts, theories or philosophies will ensure profitable investment. The information contained herein is for personal use only. Any redistribution of this information is strictly prohibited.

Gold and silver backed means that various commodity options strategies in gold and/or silver may be used. When buying options, you may lose all of the money paid for the option. When selling options, you may lose more than the funds received for selling the option. Strategies using combinations of positions, such as spreads or straddles, may be as risky as taking a simple long or short position. A high degree of leverage is used to buy or sell a sufficient quantity of options and/or underlying futures contracts equal to the value of the entire portfolio. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you and lead to large losses as well as large gains. Absolute-return is not meant to imply that a positive return can or will be achieved. Absolute-return describes investment strategies which are designed to have the potential to succeed in rising, market-neutral and falling market conditions. Gold and silver backed and absolute return investments do not mean the investor will take actual physical possessions of any precious metal. Nor should any promise or guarantee be implied that such investments will perform better than any other investment in any possible future scenario described herein nor that such investments can or will preserve or protect in such possible future scenarios.

TedBits may include information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and accurate as of the date of this publication, but no independent verification has been made to ensure its accuracy or completeness. Many of the statements and views made are the opinions of the author. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This report is not a request to engage in any transaction involving the purchase or sale of futures contracts or options on futures. There is a substantial risk of loss associated with trading futures, foreign exchange and options on futures. This letter is not intended as investment advice, and its use in any respect is entirely the responsibility of the user. Past performance in never a guarantee of future results.

 
 

You are currently signed up to The Ted Bits newsletters. To unsubscribe click here


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1eqXj3X tedbits

What Happens Next?

What goes up (via free money and practically infinite leverage and rehypothecation) must come down (when the flow slows)… the dominoes are falling…

 

First Emerging Markets, then US High-yield credit, then US Stocks, and now European stocks…

 

and remember – this “selling” overseas does not mean “buying” domestically as the majority of these hot money flow trades are credit-funded and merely extinguish the debt at the margin…

 

h/t Bloomberg’s Chase van der Rhoer


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1b2L0dz Tyler Durden

The Creepy Statism of Utah’s Defense of Traditional Marriage

Gay marriage will result in kids born without faces!Attorneys for the state of Utah
have filed their
initial argument
, readable here (pdf), at the
federal appeals court in order to defend the state’s ban on
recognizing gay marriages. The 100-page opus can simply be
summarized as “It’s for the children!”

At the National Review Online’s
blog
, Michael T. Worley summarizes the 15 consequences
presented by the Utah to justify the state’s involvement in
deciding who can and cannot get married. The summary is extremely
useful in seeing exactly how certain types of conservatives are
just as statist as progressives. In fact many of the arguments have
absolutely nothing to do with gay people at all and are all about
the state making sure heterosexual people don’t get confused or
silly ideas about how to have a family if the government doesn’t
tell them how to do it.

Consider the main thrusts of their fears:

1. “First, as many commentators have observed, because
procreation is an inherently gendered affair, redefining marriage
in genderless terms would break the critical conceptual link
between marriage and procreation. . . . Given the manifest ills of
fatherless parenting, the State has a compelling interest in
sending a powerful message to women that, whenever possible,
marriage to the fathers of their children is very important to the
welfare of those children and to society itself.”

2. “Second, for similar reasons, the loss of the State’s clear
message in favor of biological mother-father parenting within
marriage would likely result in a higher percentage of couples
conceiving children without the stability that marriage would
otherwise bring.”

3. “Third, replacing the child-centric or ‘conjugal’ view
of marriage with a more adult-centric view would undermine the
existing social norm that often leads parents in acceptable but not
ideal marriages to make self-sacrifices and remain married to the
parents of their children.”

4. “Fourth, by shifting the understanding of marriage to a more
adult-centric view, the redefinition ordered by the district court
would also undermine the current social norm (weakened though it
may be) that those who wish to have children—or to engage in
conduct that could lead to children—should get married.”

Yes, the main arguments against recognizing gay marriages is
that it will somehow result in fewer marriages. Because
heterosexual women will get confused somehow about what marriage is
or whether they want one because they aren’t getting clear messages
from “the state” about what “the state” wants them to do and not
because they do or do not want to be married. (And isn’t it creepy
that it’s the women who need the messages about marriage and not
the men?)

It gets even creepier:

“Fifth, and most obviously, a genderless definition of marriage
would likely increase the number of children being raised by
same-sex parents. That could happen because the couple decides to
raise together an existing child of one of the partners. Or it
could result from the conception of a new child through surrogacy
or sperm-donation. Either way, such children will not benefit from
the State’s preferred mother-father parenting model; often they
will have no way of knowing even the identity of both biological
parents. And recent evidence on same-sex parenting, while not
conclusive, indicates that same-sex parenting arrangements are less
effective than married biological mothers and fathers in producing
positive outcomes in the lives of their children.”

“The State’s preferred mother-father parenting model” sounds
borderline socialist. Whether or not a child knows his or her
biological parents is also not the state’s business — are they
going to outlaw adoption, too? Really, the state is mostly just
asserting that it needs to play a role.

And yes, the widely discredited Mark Regnerus study is
referenced. That’s the study that compared a wide variety of
different kinds of gay familes, whether they were partnered,
single, divorced, or what have you, only to stable, married
heterosexual families. I wrote about the
awfulness of the study’s “science”
back in 2012.

Also, one of the fears listed as a potential bad consequence of
recognizing gay marriage? It’s the perpetuation of libertarian
views about privatizing marriage! Horrors!

11. “To the extent a genderless marriage definition encourages
the further abandonment—or privatization—of marriage, it
would  almost certainly reduce birthrates. Studies have shown
that cohabiting couples tend to produce fewer children on average
than married couples do—perhaps because the resulting instability
makes the participants less willing to bring children into the mix.
Thus, if overall marriage rates decline further, birthrates would
likely decline as well.”

The weirdest argument spread throughout is fear that the
government needs to make sure birthrates and fertility stay up. The
drop in birthrates in Western countries (and even non-Western
countries!) is a function of improving economic security and
safety. It is not a cause for concern (other than for our
poorly-thought-out entitlement systems) and is evidence of the
world becoming a better place, not a worse place. Neither Utah, nor
America, is in any danger of running out of people. Also, worrying
about families having children outside the state-favored marital
arrangements and then pivoting to worrying about families
not having children outside the state-favored marital
arrangements doesn’t exactly make a coherent case.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kUPRhy
via IFTTT

The Rand Paul/Ron Paul Disconnect on Drugs

One of Ron Paul’s defining moments–vivid proof that this is a
very different kind of character we are dealing with here, in a
great way–was when, at the first 2012 cycle Republican
presidential candidate debate in May 2011
, he mocked the idea
that legalizing heroin was a terrible idea that would lead everyone
to do heroin.

“It’s amazing that we want freedom to pick our future in a
spiritual way but not when it comes to our personal habits,” he
said, and advocating leaving drug policy to the states: “up until
this past century they were legal….How many people here would use
heroin if it were legal? I bet nobody would!….’Oh yeah, I need
the government to take care of me, I don’t want to use heroin so I
need these laws.”

That boldness actually was a big applause line. It was a sea
change in what was possible in American politics, even if no one
has been bold enough to try to occupy the space Ron Paul
cleared.

The Washington Post
writes yesterday
that Paul’s son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul,
while making decent noises in a libertarian direction on drug
policy, isn’t bold enough to be a legalizer:

The younger Paul has long distanced himself from his father’s
pro-legalization stances. While campaigning for his father, Rand
defended the states-rights positions, but he has since made a point
to note that he does not personally favor the legalization of drugs
such as heroin and cocaine. He spent much of last
year assuring
conservatives
 — who will be crucial in Iowa, New
Hampshire and much of the heartland in 2016 — that, when it came
to drugs, he was on their side.

But much of the Paul brand is built on the backs of the
Libertarian-leaning voters who buoyed his father’s presidential
bids, and Paul’s refusals in the past to voice support for
state-level legalization has earned him some
chiding
 from them. He
has, however, charted out a fairly libertarian — some might even
argue, liberal — position on drug sentencing reform, calling for
the walk-back of federal mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent
drug offenses.

As 2016 inches closer, Paul may find himself increasingly tugged
in two directions. Thus far, Paul has toed the line —
supporting sentencing reform that is considered by many essential
to undoing the societal damage done by the war on drugs while
deliberately staying far away from his father’s states’ rights
crusades with regard to drugs.

I got the sense when
interviewing Paul last week and bringing up the topic
, even
about pot, that he’d rather not be pressed on what he really might
philosophically believe deep down in a perfect world on this topic,
but just wants to talk about the specific policies he’s actually
advocating as a legislator to ameliorate some of the worst effects
of the drug war, especially when it comes to sentencing and
industrial hemp. This certainly isn’t satisfying to full
legalizers, as Mike Riggs has written about for us
here
and
here
.

I’m not even sure, as Rand Paul seems to be, that avoiding
legalization head on will make him a more effective change agent
around the edges of the drug war, moving the goalposts of the
politically acceptable in a way that might make politician Rand
Paul of 2018 feel free to say some more interesting things about
the legality of drugs–just as Barack Obama has felt politically
freed to at least say sensible things about pot.

In the meantime, those who need a national politician who is
willing to mock heroin’s illegality can know that Rand Paul is not,
right now, their man.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kUPQdu
via IFTTT

What you can learn from the founders of Hong Kong

Hong Kong 150x150 What you can learn from the founders of Hong Kong

February 5, 2014
Panguipulli, Chile

As you may know, I’m an avid reader. I devour especially historical accounts of any kind, because I consider lessons of history to be invaluable. As the Latin proverb says: Historia magistra vitae est—history is life’s teacher.

One of my all-time favorite books is a novel by James Clavell, Tai-pan. It’s the second book in his series of six novels known as The Asian Saga—a fictional account of historical facts.

Tai-Pan tells the story of Western, and especially British, traders at the time of the Opium Wars with China. The story starts right after the British have defeated the Chinese Empire in the First Opium War and claimed a barren island in the Pearl River delta as a British possession—Hong Kong.

Tai-Pan is actually a Cantonese term that literally means “big shot”, and was reserved strictly for top foreign businessmen and traders operating in the Chinese realm.

In the story, right after the ceremonial claim of Hong Kong, the eponymous Tai-Pan, a Scottish merchant Dirk Struan, who dominates the trade in tea, silk, and opium, receives letters and dispatches from his son Culum who has just arrived to the Orient from Scotland:

“Finally he broke the seal on his banker’s letter. He read it and exploded with rage.

“What is it?” Culum asked, frightened.

“Just an old pain. Nothing. It’s nothing.” Struan pretended to read the next dispatch while raging inwardly over the contents of the letter. Good sweet Christ!

“We regret to inform you that, inadvertently and momentarily, credit was overextended and there was a run on the bank, started by malicious rivals. Therefore we can no longer keep our doors open. The board of directors has advised we can pay sixpence on the pound. I have the honor to be, sir, your most obedient servant…”

And we hold close to a million sterling of their paper. Twenty-five thousand sterling for a million, and our debts close to a million pounds. We’re bankrupt.

Great God, I warned Robb not to put all the money in one bank. Na with all the speculating that was going on in England, na when a bank could issue paper in any amount that it liked.”

Chillingly familiar, right?

A million pounds was an ENORMOUS amount of money in the 1840s. And here the biggest merchant in the Orient fell into the same trap as many people do today. He failed to recognize the risks and diversify accordingly.

He was obviously aware of the threats, but didn’t act when he had the time and opportunity to do so.

The world is not that different today.

Just last week we talked about how HSBC in the UK is restricting its customers’ access to their own money. As revolting as it seems, this is what banks with capital shortfalls and liquidity crunches do.

Another thing from Europe which has gone completely unnoticed was a hearing in the European Parliament on banking, during which the new German board member of the European Central Bank, Sabine Lautenschlaeger said that it should be possible to wind down failing eurozone banks over a weekend “before markets open in Japan on Monday.”

The threats and warning signs are there for everyone to see even today.

The question is, will you have the foresight to act and mitigate your risks beforehand, or will you end up regretting your inaction, just like the Tai-Pan?

from SOVErEIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1kUNgEc
via IFTTT

How Really to Debate Creationists: Bill Nye versus Ken Ham

Jesus on a DinosaurYesterday, Ken Ham, nutty founder of Answers in
Genesis and the Creation Museum in Kentucky debated Bill Nye, the
Science Guy on the evidence for Young Earth Creationism versus that
for Evolutionary Science. A lot of media outlets, e.g., the

DailyBeast
and
Slate
, are tut-tutting Nye for participating in a debate
that provided Ham a platform from which to spread his nonsense.
Sadly, it is true that rank demagoguery has a much easier time
being entertaining than does a careful exposition of science. But
there is a way to beat Creationists at their own game – mockery.
More on that in a moment.

I got to know Ken Ham when I reported on the 2005 Creation
Mega-Conference at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University. I noted in
my reports from the conference, “Creation
Summer Camp
” and “The
Myth of Millions of Years
,” that the Ham was the author a
lavishly illustrated children’s book, The Dinosaurs of
Eden
. In that book, children garbed in biblically appropriate
duds frolic with pet dinosaurs and their parents saddle some up to
ride and carry cargo.

At the Mega-Conference, I learned that Noah’s ark carried at
least 1,000 different species of dinosaurs and (paradoxically) all
dinosaur fossils were all created from being buried by Noah’s
flood. In addition, starlight appearing to travel millions of light
years (more than 6,000 years since Creation) can be explained by
the fact that God created a “mature” universe. The Young Earth
creationists also decried the Intelligent Design creationists for
being too namby pamby. Ham asserted that the Big Bang must be
rejected as inaccurate because Genesis explains that God created
the Earth and the waters on the third day and THEN the
sun, moon, and stars on the fourth day.

So how to beat back this kind of nonsense? I humbly suggest the
approach I took when Michael Shermer and I debated Discovery
Institute intelligent designers Stephen Meyer and George Gilder
back at the 2008 Freedomfest. See the YouTube of my ten minutes of
opening remarks, “Intelligent Design by Purple Space Squids,” as
nicely illustrated by Memosphere below:

Of course, my Purple Space Squid disquisition was aimed at the
claims of intelligent design proponents who pretend to be
interested in scientific investigations. My talk clearly did not
persaude Meyer and Gilder, but by show of hands Shermer and I did
win the debate at Freedomfest. So don’t try to knock down each
individual assertion of mountebanks like Ham during such a
“debate,” but instead concentrate on the goal of explaining by
entertaining with a bit of mockery thrown in. You will gratify your
intellectual friends; annoy your enemies; and perhaps persuade some
of the confused to take a deeper look into the scads of evidence
for biological evolution.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1kUxsBy
via IFTTT