Ackman Issues Status Update On The One Year Annivesary Of His Herbalife Ideological Obsession

It was nearly three months ago when we warned that Ackman’s latest strategy of converting 40% of his Herbalife short exposure into puts would massively backfire, first because he still have major short squeeze potential left on his books, and second because now he is subject to theta or a time horizon, for his thesis to play out. Ackman’s (il)logic was summarized as follows: “The explanation of being forced out of nearly half of his position is amusing: “we minimize the risk of so-called short squeezes or other technical attempts by market manipulators to force us to cover our position.” So Ackman is forced out by his Prime Brokers so as not to be forced out by market manipulators? That’s an interesting explanation for what is a far simple situation: booking your paper losses.” Just under three months later HLF hit its all time highs, and Ackman’s puts (not to mention his stock short) have generated material losses.

Back then we concluded that “with trades like this, which has now become an ideological obsession and moved beyond and semblance of rational investing (any normal person would have pulled the plug on the nearly half a billion dollar losing trade long ago) and is rapidly morphing into a replica of Pershing Square IV, said career may not be too long.” Today, the embattled so-called retail expert pours more fuel in the futre, and provides a 7-page update on what his plans for Herbalife are. In short: it really does seem that Ackman is prepared to take his HLF short until the end of the world…  or its LBO. Whichever comes first.

From Pershing Square:

It has been one year since our December 20, 2012 Herbalife presentation. In light of the passage of time, recent developments, and questions we have received, I thought it would be useful to review this investment and our approach year-to-date.

ZH: readers can catch up on how one hedge funds can lose over half a billion on one trade at their own leisure in the letter below.

Two recent developments, a Belgian appeals court decision and the recent completion of the Pricewaterhouse reaudit, have been mischaracterized by analysts and misconstrued by the market. When combined with the false rumor that Pershing Square has quietly capitulated on its position, these developments have caused the stock to rally to new all-time highs.

ZH: Uhm, no. What has propelled the stock to all time highs is the audit, the increasing probability of a major debt-funded stock buyback, or, worse for Ackman, an LBO, as well as the fact that while one may allege the company is a ponzi scheme, it is a cash flow generating ponzi scheme, something which in the Old Normal school of investing was the only thing that mattered. And as long as HLF continues to generate cash, the stock will continue to rise.

It gets better:

Beginning in early January and up until the present, we have been contacted by a number of former Herbalife employees who have shared with us additional information that confirms the illegality of the Company’s business practices. We have also communicated with hundreds of former Herbalife distributors who have shared their stories of being seduced into the so-called Herbalife “business opportunity,” and manipulated into spending thousands, and often tens of thousands, of dollars on the false hopes of financial success as a distributor.

 

We have chosen not to disclose this information publicly in order to allow the regulators the time to do their own investigations and analysis. For this reason, at the recent Robin Hood investor conference, we were careful to limit our presentation to disclosures which would not interfere with ongoing regulatory activity. Our Robin Hood presentation described the SEC’s recent investor alert which identifies seven hallmarks of a pyramid scheme and an Herbalife victim video made by Make the Road, a well-regarded Latino advocacy organization.

 

While we believe that our approach has been successful in garnering significant regulatory interest, there has been a substantial short-term economic cost to Pershing Square due to our silence. Because Pershing Square has a reputation for doing extremely thorough research, Herbalife investors incorrectly assume that we have disclosed everything negative we know about the Company’s business, particularly in light of the more than 300-page original presentation. While the original presentation was certainly comprehensive, we limited it to an introduction to Herbalife and only those facts and issues that we could prove at the time, with a plan to present additional information in future presentations as we completed our research.

ZH: Ah, ye olde “we know stuff, but we won’t disclose it until the right time” bluff. Does that include spurious, unfounded leaks to the NY Post? Or maybe Ackman’s losses have to hit $1 billion, $2 billion or more on HLF before he decides that the time has come and to unleash this torrent of evidence that would crater the stock once and for all. Either way, brilliant strategy. Just keep accumulating all that uber top-secret damning stuff.

And the punchline of all punchlines, when Ackman talks about the biggest risk to Pershing Square: a levered recap:

While a recap would facilitate the exit of large illiquid shareholders, we believe that it would destroy rather than create shareholder value. As a result, we would welcome a recap which would have the ancillary benefit of the creation of a CDS market where we could more efficiently effectuate our investment at greater scale, at lower cost, and with less risk.

ZH: So…. you are saying there is shareholder value here? Which is a little contrary to the original thesis that said the value of Herbalife is $0. Which is it?

* * *

It goes on. For those who want more amusement on this slow news day, here is what Ackman “plans to do going forward”

In one or more future presentations and/or other communications, we will be describing our analysis and conclusions from the last 12 months of our investigation including information we have obtained from former Herbalife employees, a number of whom have sought whistleblower status with regulators. Our next presentation, among other issues, will include an analysis of the three principal sources of revenue growth for the Company: Internet-based Lead Generation, nutrition clubs, and the Company’s China operation.

 

We will show that the Company’s decade-old Lead Generation recruiting methods promoted by Herbalife’s top distributors, which were ostensibly prohibited by Herbalife beginning on June 30th – several months after we shared the details of this business method with the FTC, SEC and several State Attorneys General – continue to this day.

 

We will show that nutrition clubs, which the Company has suggested demonstrate “daily consumption” for products principally from the Latino community, are in fact recruiting venues to attract low-income distributors who do not have the $3,000 required to become an Herbalife supervisor.

 

We will show how Herbalife’s Chinese operation likely violates the multi-level marketing restrictions
in that market. We will share data that will enable investors to understand the extremely high distributor failure rates in countries around the world, providing additional evidence of the deceptive nature of what Herbalife management calls “The Best Business Opportunity in the World.”

 

Finally, we will focus on the plight of the Herbalife victims and share their stories in their own words.

 

We continue to believe that our Herbalife short position offers an extremely compelling, and, as now structured, even greater asymmetric payoff than before because of the stock price’s substantial rise.

Unfortunately, there was no update in Ackman’s letter how many investors in his fund have pulled money as a result of the concerted strike back effort of Herbalife and Moelis to convince LPs to pull their capital from the hedge fund with a seemingly unperturbable ideological crusade.

Full letter below:


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/cATernH1jyQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Nick Gillespie Discusses a Libertarian Future for the GOP on MSNBC's Hardball, Tonight at 7pm ET

Chris MatthewsTonight, so
that you don’t have to, Reason’s Nick Gillespie appears on Hardball with Chris Matthews to
discuss the future of the Republican Party. Specifically, can
Senator Rand Paul and like-minded colleagues make the GOP more
attractive to younger voters with a libertarian-ish message of
tolerance and freedom? And can they do so without alienating the
grumpy, more authoritarian old guard? Tune in to find out Nick’s
take on a political balancing act that has implications well beyond
one political party.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/23/nick-gillespie-discusses-a-libertarian-f
via IFTTT

Nick Gillespie Discusses a Libertarian Future for the GOP on MSNBC’s Hardball, Tonight at 7pm ET

Chris MatthewsTonight, so
that you don’t have to, Reason’s Nick Gillespie appears on Hardball with Chris Matthews to
discuss the future of the Republican Party. Specifically, can
Senator Rand Paul and like-minded colleagues make the GOP more
attractive to younger voters with a libertarian-ish message of
tolerance and freedom? And can they do so without alienating the
grumpy, more authoritarian old guard? Tune in to find out Nick’s
take on a political balancing act that has implications well beyond
one political party.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/23/nick-gillespie-discusses-a-libertarian-f
via IFTTT

Fayette County arrests report — Dec. 10–16

The following arrests were reported by local law enforcement agencies for the past week. All persons are considered innocent until proven guilty. Rather than indicating the age of those arrested, only the year of birth will be noted below due to law enforcement procedural changes.

Tuesday, Dec. 10 – Monday, Dec. 16

Fayette County Sheriff’s Office

Terry N. Beasley, born in 1985, of Summerwood Drive, Fairburn, for probation/parole violation.

read more

via The Citizen http://www.thecitizen.com/articles/12-23-2013/fayette-county-arrests-report-%E2%80%94-dec-10%E2%80%9316

Fund Of Funds Implosion Forces Conversion Of Ever More Hedge Funds Into "Long-Onlies"

In a world in which the Chief Risk Officer of the formerly free capital markets, Ben Bernanke, has made any downside hedges obsolete (and as a result hedge funds have posted 5 years of returns without outperforming the S&P500), the first casualty has emerged: fund of funds. These parasitic, fee-soaking institutions, which merely collect a fee on top of the fees already charged by hedge funds, are rapidly on their way to extinction as the following charts from Eurekahedge prove conclusively.

As Hedge Fund Insight says, the divergence of the paths since the Credit Crunch of the single manager and multi-manager hedge fund businesses is well known, and is reflected in the time series of aggregate AUMs for the two sectors, shown below.

Comparative growth in funds of hedge funds & hedge fund assets under management since Jan 2008

The beginning of the end for the FOF industry started in 2008: before the watershed of 2008 each year there were more launches of funds of hedge funds than closures. Since 2008 there have been more closures of funds of funds than launches of funds of funds. So the number of funds of funds continues to shrink, though at a slightly slower rate in 2013 than 2012. The current AUM of the industry is 38.6% below its 2008 peak and stands at US$507.6 billion managed by a total of 3,214 funds.

Launches and closures of fund of hedge funds pre and post Credit Crunch

 

Furthermore, recent trends confirm that it is only a matter of time before Fund of Funds go the way of the dodo: the table of monthly flow data shows some changes in the last three years in seasonality, consistency of flows and total flows to funds of hedge funds. In 2011 and 2012 there were two months of net subscriptions in the Winter. In 2013 there were no inflows in February and March. Taking a diffusion index approach:  in 2011 there were five months with inflows, in 2012 there were three months of net subscriptions, and in 2013 there has been one month out of nine in which investors added to the capital managed by funds of funds. Net subscriptions have become much less frequent.

 Monthly flows in fund of hedge funds industry in last three years ($bn)

Naturally, the FOF industry which generates massive fees for its “value adding” managers, will not go down without a fight. And as Pensions and Investment reports, the FOFs have found a way to strike back: convert hedge funds into long only, idiot money, and we do enjoy the irony that in this centrally-planned market the idiot money is outperforming the smart, nimble asset managers by orders of magnitude.

From P&I:

Among the industry’s best-kept secrets is that hedge funds-of-funds heavyweight managers Black-stone Alternative Asset Management and The Rock Creek Group LP between them run nearly $7 billion in long-only strategies using hedge fund portfolio managers in manager-of-managers structures.

 

Industry sources contacted for this story were slightly aware of Blackstone’s migration into long-only approaches, but none had heard of Rock Creek’s endeavor.

 

By contrast, a number of respected hedge fund managers have been fairly open about the launch of long-only versions of their strategies just this year.

 

These firms include CQS (U.K.) LLP, Lansdowne Partners LP, Lone Pine Capital LLC, Maverick Capital Ltd., Tiger Global Management LLC, Viking Global Investors LP and Winton Capital Management Ltd.

 

Institutional investors, dissatisfied with the returns they are getting from their traditional active equity and fixed-income managers, have been the primary drivers behind the launch of long-only strategies by hedge fund and funds-of-funds firms, sources said.

 

A surprisingly high percentage — 44% — of institutional investors invest in long-only strategies run by hedge fund managers, according to data from Deutsche Bank Markets Global Prime Finance, the finance unit of the investment bank.

 

A majority of hedge fund companies — 67% — said demand from all client types was among the top three reasons for offering long-only strategies.

Hedge funds… only in name:

A very tough environment for shorting stocks and fixed-income instruments over the past few years led to hedge fund managers deciding to separate their skill on the long side of their investment approach into stand-alone strategies.

 

“It’s a function of low alpha production on the short side since 2008 until about September this year. Short-selling as a stand-alone strategy or as part of a long/short equity portfolio was basically written off,” said Scott C. Schweighauser, partner and president, Aurora Investment Management LLC, Chicago.

There is still hope that shorting may come back:

Over the past two to three months, “shorts have come back” and “2014 is setting up to be very good for absolute positive returns and alpha generation,” said Mr. Schweighauser, but he said it’s doubtful that institutional investors will abandon their hedge fund managers’ long-only portfolios.

 

“Hedge fund managers, even if they are managing a long strategy, are oriented toward absolute returns. They are not guided by having to hew to an index benchmark as a traditional active manager and that tends to produce less correlated and idiosyncratic returns,” Mr. Schweighauser said.

Unfortunately, since the only signal for “alpha” generation is the consolidated balance sheet of the world’s central banks, any hope that a sustained market correction and/or return to normalcy, can take place will have to wait for the post-CB era, which may or may not come now that the world is completely habituated to operating under the umbrella of central banks. And until that time comes, if ever, fees for hedge funds, the highest in the industry, are about to tumble and become comparable to those charged by their “idiot money” peers.

The 20% performance fee charged by many hedge fund managers is dependent on generating a positive absolute return above the fund’s high-water mark. In bad years, hedge fund firms don’t get paid, which means they can’t pay bonuses and start getting nervous about losing staff, he said.

Yes, but dumb money funds also don’t charge a performance fee, which as the move toward global equivalency accelerates, will
mean that only the most stellar hedge fund performers will be able to collect the kinds of returns that allowed the Teppers and Paulsons of the world to generate billions in bottom line profits for themselves every year. Everyone else will be washed under the great mediocrity of being a long-only stock picker, until such time as shorting is not only required but becomes the only strategy again. By then it will be, as always, too late.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/DQP9TbSLK5Y/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Fund Of Funds Implosion Forces Conversion Of Ever More Hedge Funds Into “Long-Onlies”

In a world in which the Chief Risk Officer of the formerly free capital markets, Ben Bernanke, has made any downside hedges obsolete (and as a result hedge funds have posted 5 years of returns without outperforming the S&P500), the first casualty has emerged: fund of funds. These parasitic, fee-soaking institutions, which merely collect a fee on top of the fees already charged by hedge funds, are rapidly on their way to extinction as the following charts from Eurekahedge prove conclusively.

As Hedge Fund Insight says, the divergence of the paths since the Credit Crunch of the single manager and multi-manager hedge fund businesses is well known, and is reflected in the time series of aggregate AUMs for the two sectors, shown below.

Comparative growth in funds of hedge funds & hedge fund assets under management since Jan 2008

The beginning of the end for the FOF industry started in 2008: before the watershed of 2008 each year there were more launches of funds of hedge funds than closures. Since 2008 there have been more closures of funds of funds than launches of funds of funds. So the number of funds of funds continues to shrink, though at a slightly slower rate in 2013 than 2012. The current AUM of the industry is 38.6% below its 2008 peak and stands at US$507.6 billion managed by a total of 3,214 funds.

Launches and closures of fund of hedge funds pre and post Credit Crunch

 

Furthermore, recent trends confirm that it is only a matter of time before Fund of Funds go the way of the dodo: the table of monthly flow data shows some changes in the last three years in seasonality, consistency of flows and total flows to funds of hedge funds. In 2011 and 2012 there were two months of net subscriptions in the Winter. In 2013 there were no inflows in February and March. Taking a diffusion index approach:  in 2011 there were five months with inflows, in 2012 there were three months of net subscriptions, and in 2013 there has been one month out of nine in which investors added to the capital managed by funds of funds. Net subscriptions have become much less frequent.

 Monthly flows in fund of hedge funds industry in last three years ($bn)

Naturally, the FOF industry which generates massive fees for its “value adding” managers, will not go down without a fight. And as Pensions and Investment reports, the FOFs have found a way to strike back: convert hedge funds into long only, idiot money, and we do enjoy the irony that in this centrally-planned market the idiot money is outperforming the smart, nimble asset managers by orders of magnitude.

From P&I:

Among the industry’s best-kept secrets is that hedge funds-of-funds heavyweight managers Black-stone Alternative Asset Management and The Rock Creek Group LP between them run nearly $7 billion in long-only strategies using hedge fund portfolio managers in manager-of-managers structures.

 

Industry sources contacted for this story were slightly aware of Blackstone’s migration into long-only approaches, but none had heard of Rock Creek’s endeavor.

 

By contrast, a number of respected hedge fund managers have been fairly open about the launch of long-only versions of their strategies just this year.

 

These firms include CQS (U.K.) LLP, Lansdowne Partners LP, Lone Pine Capital LLC, Maverick Capital Ltd., Tiger Global Management LLC, Viking Global Investors LP and Winton Capital Management Ltd.

 

Institutional investors, dissatisfied with the returns they are getting from their traditional active equity and fixed-income managers, have been the primary drivers behind the launch of long-only strategies by hedge fund and funds-of-funds firms, sources said.

 

A surprisingly high percentage — 44% — of institutional investors invest in long-only strategies run by hedge fund managers, according to data from Deutsche Bank Markets Global Prime Finance, the finance unit of the investment bank.

 

A majority of hedge fund companies — 67% — said demand from all client types was among the top three reasons for offering long-only strategies.

Hedge funds… only in name:

A very tough environment for shorting stocks and fixed-income instruments over the past few years led to hedge fund managers deciding to separate their skill on the long side of their investment approach into stand-alone strategies.

 

“It’s a function of low alpha production on the short side since 2008 until about September this year. Short-selling as a stand-alone strategy or as part of a long/short equity portfolio was basically written off,” said Scott C. Schweighauser, partner and president, Aurora Investment Management LLC, Chicago.

There is still hope that shorting may come back:

Over the past two to three months, “shorts have come back” and “2014 is setting up to be very good for absolute positive returns and alpha generation,” said Mr. Schweighauser, but he said it’s doubtful that institutional investors will abandon their hedge fund managers’ long-only portfolios.

 

“Hedge fund managers, even if they are managing a long strategy, are oriented toward absolute returns. They are not guided by having to hew to an index benchmark as a traditional active manager and that tends to produce less correlated and idiosyncratic returns,” Mr. Schweighauser said.

Unfortunately, since the only signal for “alpha” generation is the consolidated balance sheet of the world’s central banks, any hope that a sustained market correction and/or return to normalcy, can take place will have to wait for the post-CB era, which may or may not come now that the world is completely habituated to operating under the umbrella of central banks. And until that time comes, if ever, fees for hedge funds, the highest in the industry, are about to tumble and become comparable to those charged by their “idiot money” peers.

The 20% performance fee charged by many hedge fund managers is dependent on generating a positive absolute return above the fund’s high-water mark. In bad years, hedge fund firms don’t get paid, which means they can’t pay bonuses and start getting nervous about losing staff, he said.

Yes, but dumb money funds also don’t charge a performance fee, which as the move toward global equivalency accelerates, will mean that only the most stellar hedge fund performers will be able to collect the kinds of returns that allowed the Teppers and Paulsons of the world to generate billions in bottom line profits for themselves every year. Everyone else will be washed under the great mediocrity of being a long-only stock picker, until such time as shorting is not only required but becomes the only strategy again. By then it will be, as always, too late.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/DQP9TbSLK5Y/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Concealed Carry Means Fewer Murders, Says New Study

Concealed carry Quinnipiac University economist Mark Gius has
published a new study, “An
examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault
weapons bans on state-level murder rates
,” in the journal
Applied Economics Letters. From the abstract:

The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of
state-level assault weapons bans and concealed weapons laws on
state-level murder rates. Using data for the period 1980 to 2009
and controlling for state and year fixed effects, the results of
the present study suggest that states with restrictions on the
carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murder rates
than other states. It was also found that assault weapons bans did
not significantly affect murder rates at the state level. These
results suggest that restrictive concealed weapons laws may cause
an increase in gun-related murders at the state level. The results
of this study are consistent with some prior research in this area,
most notably Lott and Mustard (1997).

Intriguing.

For more background: The most recent Reason-Rupe poll reports
that
63 percent of Americans
don’t believe that stricter gun laws
would keep weapons out of the hands of criminals.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/23/concealed-carry-fewer-murders-says-new-s
via IFTTT

Rand Paul Shows Some Charm, for Festivus Grievance Airings and Against the Drug War and Peter King

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) pre-working on that human touch stuff
said to be so important to presidential candidates in these here
modern times, as he uses his Twitter
account
for an alternately serious and comic “airing of the
grievances” for Festivus, the invented holiday from
Seinfeld.

He’s pissed at bipartisan compromise that always adds up to more
spending; at Senate policies that stifle debate; Federal Reserve
policy that harms the poor and savers; at politicians who only
selectively support the Bill of Rights; at D.C. parking
restrictions and at people (like some of his staff) who tell him
not to wear turtlenecks on TV.

A nice spinoff from the Twittering has been Paul engaging his
Senate colleague Cory Booker from New Jersey for not retweeting him
enough, giving Paul an opportunity to
hype his own efforts at drug war reform
, including mandatory
minimum sentencing reform and industrial hemp legalization.

Late last week, one of Paul’s
presumptive opponents
in a very likely presidential run in
2016, New York Rep. Peter King, helped remind Americans why it
might be nice having a Rand Paul on their side by saying
Paul has disgraced his office
for such un-American acts as
calling out National Intelligence director James Clapper for
deliberately lying to a Senate committee.

This is exactly the kind of fight Paul can likely expect, from
GOP primary opponents likely of greater importance than the hapless
King. It was a mitzvah from King to get Paul primed for it. Paul
running in Republican primaries will be in part a fight over tribal
identity politics with the security state that imprison too many
Republicans, contrasting that ugly impulse with an actual
wide-range belief in limited, constitutional government that
respects Americans rights.

I am afraid it might be a harder fight than Paul expects, but
look forward to watching the melee.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/23/rand-paul-shows-some-charm-for-festivus
via IFTTT

Art Cashin Poetically Laments Bitcoins, Binge-Viewing, Boston, Baltimore, And Bargaining Brokers

“Twas the days before Christmas, and all across the street, not a human was trading…” but, as tradition demands, UBS’ venerable director floor operations – Art Cashin – unleashes his annual poem. Summing up the year in amazing alliteration, Cashin takes on Bitcoins, The Fed, the Volcker Rule, and… Anthony Weiner.

 

Via Art Cashin,

A TRADITIONAL PRESENTATION

 

‘Tis two days before Christmas

and at each brokerage house

The only thing stirring

was the click of a mouse

 

Down on the Exchange

the tape inches along

Brokers bargained and traded

as they hummed an old song

 

The Fed kept on printing

yet few jobs did appear

But it’s time to move on

so they’ll taper next year

 

Boston won the World Series

Baltimore took the Bowl

But Tiger still struggles

to get the ball in the hole

 

From Bitcoins to Binge-viewing

brand new things did occur

And the Prez took a selfie

that caused quite a stir

 

There was a government shutdown

most folks called it a sham

And to slow down the Senate

a guy read “Green Eggs and Ham”

 

In Cleveland three women

finally freed of their fears

Held captive by a mad man

for nearly ten years

 

The Pope said he resigned

an occurrence quite rare

A new Pope named Francis

new sits in that chair

 

Back tried Spitzer and Weiner

they brought little to cheer

But it’s Christmastime, Alice

and Santa is near

 

So stop looking backwards

have a cup of good cheer

And kiss you a loved one

raise your hopes for next year

 

And amidst all the trading

Christmas themes we will heed

And share our good fortune

with families in need

 

And tomorrow they’ll pause

as we wait on the bell

To sing a tradition

a song for old “Nell”

 

Don’t let this year’s problems

impede Christmas Cheer

Resolve to be happy

throughout the New Year

 

And resist ye Grinch feelings

let joy never stop

Put the bad at the bottom

keep the good on the top

 

So count up your blessings

along with your worth

You’re still living here

in the best place on earth

 

And think ye of wonders

that light children’s eyes

And hope Santa will bring you

that Christmas surprise

 

So play ye a carol

by Mario Lanza

Unless you are waiting

to celebrate Kwanzaa

 

Hanukkah’s over

And Ramadan’s gone

Different folks, different holidays

yet each spirit lives on

 

Whatever your feast is

we hope you all still

Find yourself just surrounded

by folks of goodwill

 

Tuesday, as the bell rings

hark to your heart’s call

And as Santa would shout

Merry Christmas to All!


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/WH8E_8ZOtvE/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Paul Krugman Spastically and Irrationally Attacks Bitcoin…Here’s My Response

The last aggressive anti-Bitcoin tirade I recall from Paul Krugman was written on April 14th of this year. It was such an irrational piece of drivel that I decided to respond to his Op-ed nearly paragraph by paragraph in my piece, Paul Krugman Goes on the Attack: Calls Bitcoin “Antisocial,” which I strongly suggest you read if you haven’t already.

What is most interesting about that previous article in hindsight is that he wrote it right after Bitcoin experienced its first major crash of 2013 (there have been two thus far, both after greater than 10-fold increases in the price). While I know Krugman periodically attacks Bitcoin, it’s interesting that this latest Bitcoin hit piece also came directly after the second crash. For those who are holders of Bitcoin, this should be taken as a very positive price signal going forward. Krugman’s prior article was written the day before the abolsute low price for the decline was reached at $50/btc on April 15th. It seems that Krugman becomes particularly comfortable slamming Bitcoin only after a price crash.

In any event, his latest Op-ed is almost as bad as the first one, and so I thought it’d be worthwhile to highlight his ignorance, irrationality and blatant use of statist propaganda once again. So let’s go.

From the New York Times:

This is a tale of three money pits. It’s also a tale of monetary regress — of the strange determination of many people to turn the clock back on centuries of progress.

The first money pit is an actual pit — the Porgera open-pit gold mine in Papua New Guinea, one of the world’s top producers. The mine has a terrible reputation for both human rights abuses (rapes, beatings and killings by security personnel) and environmental damage (vast quantities of potentially toxic tailings dumped into a nearby river). But gold prices, while down from their recent peak, are still three times what they were a decade ago, so dig they must.

The second money pit is a lot stranger: the Bitcoin mine in Reykjanesbaer, Iceland. Bitcoin is a digital currency that has value because … well, it’s hard to say exactly why, but for the time being at least people are willing to buy it because they believe other people will be willing to buy it. It is, by design, a kind of virtual gold. And like gold, it can be mined: you can create new bitcoins, but only by solving very complex mathematical problems that require both a lot of computing power and a lot of electricity to run the computers.

In the three paragraphs above, Krugman in employing a strategy that anti-gold people have used for years if not decades. That it is wasteful and environmentally destructive to mine for gold since it has no real purpose. Interesting. What purpose do diamonds have Paul? Did you buy your wife a diamond ring for your engagement? Did you make sure it wasn’t a blood diamond? Aren’t people likely raped and exploited in the mining of diamonds? I wonder how many articles Krugman has written on the destructiveness of diamond mining, a gem that isn’t even rare to begin with.

I tend to notice a huge hypocrisy from statists that in reality hate gold because it is a competing monetary asset, but then attempt to explain away their disdain using another, more publicly palatable rationale such as environmental destruction. After all, gold should get some credit for having at least has two hugely significant historical purposes. It has been valued for both its beauty and durability as jewelry, as well as for its monetary attributes. Diamonds have one primary purpose only recently established due to extensive marketing efforts (also in drills but you get the point), which is as a status or wealth symbol, so you’d think Krugman and other statists would get far more hot and bothered about blood diamonds than gold; but do they? No, they don’t. The hypocrisy is obvious.

The second thing Krugman does in the latest Op-Ed is to take this faux criticism and then attach it to Bitcoin. See the following paragraph:

Hence the location in Iceland, which has cheap electricity from hydropower and an abundance of cold air to cool those furiously churning machines. Even so, a lot of real resources are being used to create virtual objects with no clear use.

No clear use? Really, Krugman? There is nothing useful about essentially costless transfers of value on a peer-to-peer basis? There is no value to monetary transfers that eliminate expensive and parasitic middlemen? There is no value to using a public key as a way to ask for payment, thus reducing  enormous security concerns caused by providing all your private information to hundreds of merchants using credit cards? No value to being able to send millions of dollars across the globe in minutes rather than days? No value to free market currencies competing with state currencies? No value to economic freedom?

There are plenty of valid criticisms of Bitcoin, and a clear and thoughtful expression of those criticisms can only help the marketplace improve free-market crypto currencies in the future. Yet the irrational, ramblings of a statist who clearly hasn’t taken two minutes to objectively analyze Bitcoin is of no use to anyone and a disgrace to a supposedly highbrow newspaper like the New York Times.

His full Op-Ed is here if you have the stomach.

In Liberty,
Mike

 Follow me on Twitter.

Paul Krugman Spastically and Irrationally Attacks Bitcoin…Here’s My Response originally appeared on A Lightning War for Liberty on December 23, 2013.

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/12/23/paul-krugman-spastically-and-irrationally-attacks-bitcoin-once-again/
via IFTTT