Tag: news

This from the L.A. Weekly is a couple of weeks old but
only came to my attention today, an interesting story about a man
in a wheelchair who has
sued Los Angeles businesses nearly 1,000 times for
violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Some details. Jon Carpenter had been a Sunday school teacher in
Utah arrested for sexual abuse of a minor in incidents involving
two 8-year-old girls. Then:

the day after he was sentenced in 1989, according to jail
reports, Carpenter stood atop his bunk bed and dove head-first into
the concrete floor. When a guard later asked if he’d jumped
intentionally, Carpenter replied, “Yes, I did, it’s better than
being in this place for six months.”

Two days later, the state of Utah informed Judge George E. Ballif that Carpenter was
a permanent quadriplegic and asked that Ballif “suspend execution
of the sentence until such time as the defendant has achieved
medical stability,” arguing that “further incarceration or therapy
in this matter would serve little purpose and in any event is not
appropriate at the present time.”

So the wheelchair-bound Carpenter moved to Los Angeles and
starting filing Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuits, nearly a
thousand so far in L.A. County alone, 257 in 2012 alone.

According to David Peters, who heads Lawyers Against Lawsuit
Abuse, Carpenter has sued 94 pharmacies for everything from steep
ramps and failure to remodel access areas to lack of Braille or
hearing-assistance technology for the blind and deaf.

Carpenter’s hearing and vision, Peters says, were perfectly
fine.

California is a rare state that lets people who allege an
ADA violation personally win pots of cash in court — $4,000 minimum
per violation, plus attorney’s fees, which can reach tens of
thousands of dollars.

Small businesses can be sued if the paper towel dispenser in the
bathroom is too high; the customer counter is too tall; aisles are
too narrow; or the grade of their wheelchair ramp is steeper than 3
percent.

But in California, defense attorney James Link says, those regulations run about
435 pages. “I had one case where the coat hook in the men’s
accessible stall at a P.F. Chang’s was
too high.”….

“California is the only jurisdiction on the planet that has
minimum financial damages for claims of this nature,” Peters says,
referring to the $4,000 floor. He estimates that 42 percent or more
of the nation’s ADA lawsuits are filed in California. “There are
lawyers who have moved from other states just to file these
lawsuits here,” he says. “It’s more profitable than [selling]
narcotics.”

According to Link, more than 3,000 ADA lawsuits were filed in
L.A. County in the last three years — more than 1,700 of them by
attorneys Morse Mehrban of L.A. and Mark Potter of San Diego’s Center for Disability
Access.

“I stand by every case,” Potter says via email. “This is an
important federal civil right that we are talking about.”

Link scoffs. “If you’re trying to clean up the stores and
restaurants that you frequent, that’s one thing. But if you are
going to 1,000 different businesses … that’s just trolling.”
(Mehrban, who didn’t respond to the Weekly‘s calls,
this year told ABC 7 News, “Isn’t every lawsuit technically
extortion?”)

Technically! Carpenter’s M.O.:

Carpenter and his current attorney, Potter, almost always target
mini-malls or small businesses, which must create parking spots for
special vans like the one he drives. They also must provide parking
lot space for a wheelchair to be lowered, and special signage. Get
a detail wrong — even the color of the sign — and
Carpenter can sue for $4,000 and up.

“We didn’t know that we needed a parking spot for a van,” says
Avi Hadid, owner of a mini-mall at Western Avenue and Washington
Boulevard. He settled with the convicted child abuser for $10,000 —
cheaper than hiring a lawyer. A friend of Hadid’s, who owns a gas
station, also was sued by Carpenter. “They say they’re going to
pay,” Hadid says. “I’m sure he made so much money from that, this
guy.”

My 1995 Reason
cover feature on the ADA’s ability to gin up lawsuit money for
nuisances while doing little to help those unable to walk, see, or
hear (the people most in need of the costly adjustments that ADA
often demands).

An unnamed
“ranking Department of Defense official” has told The Daily Caller
that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden “stole everything — literally
everything.”

The Daily Caller’s reporting goes on to mention that
intelligence officials in the U.K. and the U.S. have considered the
possibility that Snowden may have a secret cache of information
that includes the locations of undercover intelligence workers,
which could act as an insurance policy against his capture.

From
The Daily Caller:

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden stole
vastly more information than previously speculated, and is holding
it at ransom for his own protection.

“What’s floating is so dangerous, we’d be behind for twenty
years in terms of access (if it were to be leaked),” a ranking
Department of Defense official told the Daily Caller.

Read Reason’s J.D. Tuccille’s blog post on the possible
cache
here.

Earlier this month, the editor of The Guardian said
that only
1 percent of the documents leaked by Snowden have been
published.

Follow this story and more at Reason
24/7.

Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and
Reason articles. You can get the widgets
here. If you have a story that would be of
interest to Reason’s readers please let us know by emailing the
24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories
at @reason247.

An unnamed
“ranking Department of Defense official” has told The Daily Caller
that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden “stole everything — literally
everything.”

The Daily Caller’s reporting goes on to mention that
intelligence officials in the U.K. and the U.S. have considered the
possibility that Snowden may have a secret cache of information
that includes the locations of undercover intelligence workers,
which could act as an insurance policy against his capture.

From
The Daily Caller:

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden stole
vastly more information than previously speculated, and is holding
it at ransom for his own protection.

“What’s floating is so dangerous, we’d be behind for twenty
years in terms of access (if it were to be leaked),” a ranking
Department of Defense official told the Daily Caller.

Read Reason’s J.D. Tuccille’s blog post on the possible
cache
here.

Earlier this month, the editor of The Guardian said
that only
1 percent of the documents leaked by Snowden have been
published.

Follow this story and more at Reason
24/7.

Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and
Reason articles. You can get the widgets
here. If you have a story that would be of
interest to Reason’s readers please let us know by emailing the
24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories
at @reason247.

If
you think the latest bid to reboot the public image of Obamacare is
absolutely godawful, disturbing, pathetic, you name it (I know I
do!), I’ve got news for you: You’re probably not the audience for
it. And you’re playing into the aims of the image’s creators.

For many – arguably most – Americans, this guy is hipster
douchitude on a cracker. Jeebus H. Christ, at least be swilling
brandy. The whole packaging, including the Christmas postcard
styling of the image, the infantilized image of man-child, the
vaguely imperial “GetTalking” hashtag, etc., runs through me like
months-old egg salad.

Yet, as with the widely ridiculed Life of Julia agitprop rolled
out during the 2012 campaign (read
Reason’s response here), the image above works perfectly as
propaganda (and it turns out that Julia spoke pretty loudly to its
audience, with women –
especially unmarried women – overwhelmingly going for
Obama).

First, it creates not just a
clearly defined in-group (those who see this and identify either
with the guy in the picture or his larger situation) but a clearly
defined out-group (those of us who see this and wonder what
injuries to karma we committed in previous lives that we are
looking at this sort of shit in our current incarnations). Like
Life of Julia, it
is widely talked about and has effectively won the
internet for at least a few days. And it creates a whole host of
carriers for its essential message via parody, satire, screeds, and
more.

Some of the
parodies and rewrites are genuinely funny and some are not (
the ones that reek of conservative insecurity about sexual identity
strike me as their own form of unfortunate expression). But they
all ultimately do what the spot’s creators wanted: They get people
talking about health insurance.

And with that, I’m zipping up, albeit not in meta-ironical
checkerboard pjs.

If
you think the latest bid to reboot the public image of Obamacare is
absolutely godawful, disturbing, pathetic, you name it (I know I
do!), I’ve got news for you: You’re probably not the audience for
it. And you’re playing into the aims of the image’s creators.

For many – arguably most – Americans, this guy is hipster
douchitude on a cracker. Jeebus H. Christ, at least be swilling
brandy. The whole packaging, including the Christmas postcard
styling of the image, the infantilized image of man-child, the
vaguely imperial “GetTalking” hashtag, etc., runs through me like
months-old egg salad.

Yet, as with the widely ridiculed Life of Julia agitprop rolled
out during the 2012 campaign (read
Reason’s response here), the image above works perfectly as
propaganda (and it turns out that Julia spoke pretty loudly to its
audience, with women –
especially unmarried women – overwhelmingly going for
Obama).

First, it creates not just a
clearly defined in-group (those who see this and identify either
with the guy in the picture or his larger situation) but a clearly
defined out-group (those of us who see this and wonder what
injuries to karma we committed in previous lives that we are
looking at this sort of shit in our current incarnations). Like
Life of Julia, it
is widely talked about and has effectively won the
internet for at least a few days. And it creates a whole host of
carriers for its essential message via parody, satire, screeds, and
more.

Some of the
parodies and rewrites are genuinely funny and some are not (
the ones that reek of conservative insecurity about sexual identity
strike me as their own form of unfortunate expression). But they
all ultimately do what the spot’s creators wanted: They get people
talking about health insurance.

And with that, I’m zipping up, albeit not in meta-ironical
checkerboard pjs.

Why do people have rights in the first
place? Suppose future space exploration discovers a planet
populated by highly intelligent beings, with an exquisitely rich
culture dating back several millennia, who look not at all human.
Wouldn’t it make sense to recognize them as rights-bearing
creatures anyway? And wouldn’t that make more sense than
attributing human rights to mannequins—which look very much like
humans, but have no human capacities? A question like that might
seem too fanciful, writes A. Barton Hinkle. But from chimpanzees to
artificial intelligence, science is raising important questions
about just who, and what, has rights.

View this article.