If You're Poor In Latvia, Move To Denmark

Expenditure on social benefits in the EU fell to 29.1% of GDP in 2011 from 29.7% in 2009, Eurostat said yesterday. However, do not feel too bad for the broad European social state. While France (as one might expect) nears the top of the list with over 33% of GDP spent on “social benefits”, Bloomberg’s Niraj Shah notes that it is Denmark that spends the most on welfare at 34.3% of GDP, and Latvia spent the least, 15.1%. Of course, in the new normal, as in the US, retirees accounted for the majority of the trasnfer payments with an average of 46% of total expenditure while unemployment benefit accounted for 6%. Interestingly, Greece nears the top of the list with almost 31% of GDP spent on welfare.

 

 

Source: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/M9PTxkOFiwM/story01.htm Tyler Durden

If You’re Poor In Latvia, Move To Denmark

Expenditure on social benefits in the EU fell to 29.1% of GDP in 2011 from 29.7% in 2009, Eurostat said yesterday. However, do not feel too bad for the broad European social state. While France (as one might expect) nears the top of the list with over 33% of GDP spent on “social benefits”, Bloomberg’s Niraj Shah notes that it is Denmark that spends the most on welfare at 34.3% of GDP, and Latvia spent the least, 15.1%. Of course, in the new normal, as in the US, retirees accounted for the majority of the trasnfer payments with an average of 46% of total expenditure while unemployment benefit accounted for 6%. Interestingly, Greece nears the top of the list with almost 31% of GDP spent on welfare.

 

 

Source: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/M9PTxkOFiwM/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Best friends

It’s been said that friends come and go, but best friends are forever. This year there’s one particular best friend I’m extremely thankful for.
For you see, if it weren’t for him and the kindness he has shown me over the years, it’s safe to say I wouldn’t be here today.
Rarely do I speak about divorce, and I’ve never written about it. Such an event tears families apart and can even tear at one’s very soul. Over 16 years ago such an event happened to yours truly.

read more

via The Citizen http://www.thecitizen.com/blogs/rick-ryckeley/11-22-2013/best-friends

15 Internal Affairs Investigations in Two Years and Officer Sterling Wheaten Is Still Employed

K9Officer Sterling WheatenSterling Wheaten, a K9 handler for the Atlantic
City, New Jersey, Police Department, has a special talent for
making unpleasant waves without consequences—so far. Only five
years on the job, and he’s been named in half-a-dozen lawsuits, and
investigated (but “exonerated”) repeatedly by Internal Affairs.
Now, just months after siccing his dog on a man who was already
lying on his face on the ground after being pounded by other police
officers (see the image at right), he’s accused of jumping and
arresting a woman because she videorecorded him roughing up her
brother.

From
Comcast SportsNet Philadelphia
:

[Janine] Costantino says Wheaten arrested her brother after he
got into an altercation with another patron.

“Wheaten had my brother in a headlock and his arms were limp and
his legs were weak,” Costantino said. “I screamed out that it was
police brutality and that I was videotaping it all.”
That’s when she claims Wheaten turned on her.

“He was running at me and he says, ‘Give me the phone you
b**h,’” she said. “He grabbed my bun and he was slamming my
forehead into the floor.”

Wheaten then arrested Costantino but court records show the
charges against her were later dropped. Costantino says she’ll
never forget what one officer told her the night of the
incident.

“He’s like, ‘Oh, that’s your first mistake,’” she said. “You
shouldn’t be videotaping police officers.”

Wheaten is one of six officers under investigation for using
excessive force against 20-year-old David Connor Castellani.
Castellani had been ejected from a casino for being under age.
Surveillance video of the incident (see below) shows him mouthing
off at the cops as he walked away. Apparently wounded in their
pride, the cops rushed him (he was across the street) and laid into
him with fists, feet, and batons. Late-arriver Wheaten let his dog
do the work after Castellani was down.

From Wallace McKelvey at
pressofAtlanticCity
:

Atlantic City officials and activists called for increased
scrutiny Tuesday as more allegations of excessive force surfaced
about one of six police officers recorded on video allegedly
beating a 20-year-old Linwood man this summer.

David Connor Castellani filed a lawsuit against the city, its
police department and six officers Tuesday in U.S. District Court
in Camden.

On June 15, Castellani was removed from the Tropicana Casino and
Resort. A short time later, at 3:10 a.m., Tropicana surveillance
video obtained via subpoena showed him being tackled by police,
with a K-9 released on him. Castellani’s injuries required 200
stitches and ongoing physical therapy, family members say. …

At least six other lawsuits filed in the last three years allege
that Sterling Wheaten, the K-9 officer seen in the video, abused
his power during the course of arrests. Wheaten graduated from the
Atlantic County Police K-9 Academy this May. Tracy Riley, his
attorney, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. One
of the lawsuits was dismissed and another settled out of court.

That article details the six lawsuits naming Wheaten and
predating the Castellani lawsuit, alleging such acts as punching,
beating, and throwing people down stairs. One plaintiff also claims
that Wheaten attacked him with a police dog.

The Comcast report refers to “an internal police report which
shows that Atlantic City Police internal affairs investigated
Wheaten 15 times between 2008 and 2010 for allegations of
misconduct, some of those allegations being excessive force. Each
time however, the department concluded Wheaten did nothing wrong or
that there was not enough evidence to clearly prove he did
something wrong.”

McKelvey says there are “21 complaints against Wheaten over a
three-year period” and that complainants included then-Chief John
Mooney and Deputy Chief Henry White. White alleged excessive force
and Mooney complained of “simple assault and standard of
conduct.”

The former police chief and the deputy chief complained
about Wheaten and he’s still on the job? You have to wonder just
what kind of photos he has filed away. And how long the people of
Atlantic City will have to tolerate him and his buddies.

Update: Costantino’s phone is MIA, along with her
video. According to a pressofAtlanticCity
report
:

“Wheaten stood up and handed the phone to a smaller man in a
plaid shirt and said, ‘you got this?’,” the suit reads. “To which
the man in the plaid shirt said in sum and substance, ‘yah, I’ll
take care of it. Don’t worry’.”

That man, also unidentified in the suit, allegedly put the phone
in his pocket and walked away. The phone was never recovered after
the arrest.

So we’ll have to make do with video of the Castellani
incident.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/15-internal-affairs-investigations-in-tw
via IFTTT

Carl Icahn Lambasts Ackman's "Rantings Of A Sore Loser"

We earlier discussed Bill Ackman’s lengthy interview on Bloomberg TV during which he faced up to the $500 million losses (more now) from his Herbalife position, and that it is “not a trade” for him but “will take it to the ends of the earth.” However, it seems his comments that “Herbalife longs are all 80-year-old billionaires” pissed off Carl Icahn enough to warrant his wrath. Icahn called in to Trish Regan and exclaimed, “I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser. The stock remains +5% and back near recent record highs.

 

The original Ackman interview “will take Herbalife short to the ends of the earth…”:

ACKMAN HIGHLIGHTS:

-Lost $400-500 million on Herbalife
-Losses are mark-to-market
-‘Lots of ways we can be successful’ on HLF
-Pershing has met with foreign regulators on HLF
-Herbalife re-audit should have been completed by now
-He doesn’t know what FTC is doing on Herbalife
-Re-audit is a short-term catalyst if not done by December
-An Herbalife LBO is more opportunity to go short
-He’ll take Herbalife bet ‘to the end of the earth’
-Herbalife short ‘not a trade for me’
Skeptical of Icahn’s belief in Herbalife long-term
-Puzzled by Bill Stiritz’s Herbalife motivations
-Herbalife fits FTC OCT pyramid warning
-He has data on Herbalife distributor earnings
-Seeks third party auditor on Herbalife retail sales
-Herbalife longs are all 80-year old billionaires.
-He is not short JCPenney
-Hopes JCP becomes a very successful company
-He deserves his share of responsibility for JCP

And Trish Regan and Stephanie Ruhle discuss Icahn’s tempestuous response:

“I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser…

 

Interestingly there is something that Ackman and I have in common. Ackman complained at an Oxford conference that every time I went on TV and mentioned Herbalife, the stock went up a few points. Well, that’s also true of him.”

 

We leave it to the chart as the ultimate arbiter of who is winning (so far)…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Os5PBaYXet8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Carl Icahn Lambasts Ackman’s “Rantings Of A Sore Loser”

We earlier discussed Bill Ackman’s lengthy interview on Bloomberg TV during which he faced up to the $500 million losses (more now) from his Herbalife position, and that it is “not a trade” for him but “will take it to the ends of the earth.” However, it seems his comments that “Herbalife longs are all 80-year-old billionaires” pissed off Carl Icahn enough to warrant his wrath. Icahn called in to Trish Regan and exclaimed, “I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser. The stock remains +5% and back near recent record highs.

 

The original Ackman interview “will take Herbalife short to the ends of the earth…”:

ACKMAN HIGHLIGHTS:

-Lost $400-500 million on Herbalife
-Losses are mark-to-market
-‘Lots of ways we can be successful’ on HLF
-Pershing has met with foreign regulators on HLF
-Herbalife re-audit should have been completed by now
-He doesn’t know what FTC is doing on Herbalife
-Re-audit is a short-term catalyst if not done by December
-An Herbalife LBO is more opportunity to go short
-He’ll take Herbalife bet ‘to the end of the earth’
-Herbalife short ‘not a trade for me’
Skeptical of Icahn’s belief in Herbalife long-term
-Puzzled by Bill Stiritz’s Herbalife motivations
-Herbalife fits FTC OCT pyramid warning
-He has data on Herbalife distributor earnings
-Seeks third party auditor on Herbalife retail sales
-Herbalife longs are all 80-year old billionaires.
-He is not short JCPenney
-Hopes JCP becomes a very successful company
-He deserves his share of responsibility for JCP

And Trish Regan and Stephanie Ruhle discuss Icahn’s tempestuous response:

“I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser…

 

Interestingly there is something that Ackman and I have in common. Ackman complained at an Oxford conference that every time I went on TV and mentioned Herbalife, the stock went up a few points. Well, that’s also true of him.”

 

We leave it to the chart as the ultimate arbiter of who is winning (so far)…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Os5PBaYXet8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Mythmaking and "Massive Walkouts" at the Warsaw Climate Change Conference

Warsaw Walkout 1Yesterday, a bunch of environmental and social
activists staged what they were pleased to call a “massive” walkout
from the UN climate change conference venue in Warsaw. I watched it
take place and took some cell phone photos,  and then reported
that perhaps a 100 activists, or to be really generous, maybe 150,
had
“massively” walked out
.

I returned on Friday to the conference where I hear it repeated
numerous times by various remaining members of “civil society” that
800 activists had actually joined the walkout. Then I start
googling around and find that some news outlets had reported that
number as being factually so, e.g,. Reuters,

Environment News Service
, and
Grist
. Really?

Warsaw Walkout 2

Amusingly, as I walked into the National Stadium today, I
overhead the following conversation between two young activists
while we three waited to hand over our coats at the cloakroom:

He: I walked out yesterday, did you?

She: Yes, but I had to walk back in almost immediately because
we had meeting with a delegation.

I kid you not.

When I was a reporter in Central America, I was introduced to
the concept of “lying for justice” by some supporters of the
Sandinistas who explained to me that sometimes one had to tell lies
in order to be heard.

Reports exaggerating theatrical performances of this sort are a
disservice to readers, listeners, and viewers of the news.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/mythmaking-and-massive-walkouts-at-warsa
via IFTTT

Mythmaking and “Massive Walkouts” at the Warsaw Climate Change Conference

Warsaw Walkout 1Yesterday, a bunch of environmental and social
activists staged what they were pleased to call a “massive” walkout
from the UN climate change conference venue in Warsaw. I watched it
take place and took some cell phone photos,  and then reported
that perhaps a 100 activists, or to be really generous, maybe 150,
had
“massively” walked out
.

I returned on Friday to the conference where I hear it repeated
numerous times by various remaining members of “civil society” that
800 activists had actually joined the walkout. Then I start
googling around and find that some news outlets had reported that
number as being factually so, e.g,. Reuters,

Environment News Service
, and
Grist
. Really?

Warsaw Walkout 2

Amusingly, as I walked into the National Stadium today, I
overhead the following conversation between two young activists
while we three waited to hand over our coats at the cloakroom:

He: I walked out yesterday, did you?

She: Yes, but I had to walk back in almost immediately because
we had meeting with a delegation.

I kid you not.

When I was a reporter in Central America, I was introduced to
the concept of “lying for justice” by some supporters of the
Sandinistas who explained to me that sometimes one had to tell lies
in order to be heard.

Reports exaggerating theatrical performances of this sort are a
disservice to readers, listeners, and viewers of the news.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/mythmaking-and-massive-walkouts-at-warsa
via IFTTT

The Most Despised Tax-And-Retreat French President Sinks Deeper Into Economic Quagmire

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com   www.amazon.com/author/wolfrichter

The French habitually appear to be on the verge of having had it. But the incidents have been getting denser, more frequent. There were the protests in the Bretagne and elsewhere, followed by "operation snail" where 2,100 heavy trucks drove side by side down major expressways at a snail’s pace, with everyone behind them going nuts. Every day, there are protests organized by different organizations. On Thursday, the farmers went to town, to Paris more specifically. They were getting there by driving their tractors on major highways, setting up roadblocks as they went, snarling traffic for miles.

They’re all protesting the relentless onslaught of new taxes. At first, buoyant from an election victory, President François Hollande and his government went after the rich then quickly hit even modest households, farmers, truckers, craftsmen, everyone who does or buys anything. Because it’s never enough. In January, the Value Added Tax hike will take effect. For the top tier of items, the VAT will only increase from 19.6% to 20%. But for some of the lower tier items, it will be jacked up massively. For example, for the equestrian industry, the VAT will jump from 7% to 20% – hence the protests the other day.

Now the farmers have had it. While at it, they’re also protesting EU rules on how they should run their businesses and anti-pollution laws that would limit the use of tractors on some days. The word "insurrection" is showing up in the media, though it's still more an exaggeration than a description. "Fiscal discontent” is better, but not broad enough.

After 18 months in office, Hollande's ratings have plunged to the lowest levels of any president since 1958, according to an Ifop/JDD poll, the only poll going back this far. A mere 20% of the French were satisfied with him; 17% among workers and employees; 15% among merchants and craftsmen. Even his erstwhile supporters have abandoned him.

And 79% were dissatisfied. Cited were "social desperation" of the people affected by his policies, but also his leadership qualities, his apparent "inability to decide," his "lack of discipline," his tendency to make decisions and then, when the volume gets too loud, withdraw them. It leaves the country rudderless.

Who could do a better job? Maybe Santa Claus.

Because no one else seems to be able to, in the eyes of the French. Turns out, 74% think that any of the major figures of the UMP, the party of former President Sarkozy, would do worse or no better. And on the right-wing where Marine Le Pen reigns with her National Front (FN)? 79% of the respondents think she’d be worse or no better than Hollande. There simply is no savior in sight. Much less a solution.

Spending by the government accounts for more than 56% of GDP, the highest in the Eurozone. Even thinking about cutting these outlays would be political hara-kiri. To fund this public mastodon and bring the deficit down to 3% of GDP by 2015, and into compliance with EU stability criteria – it would require a miracle – taxes must be extracted from everyone and everything in the anemic private sector.

But the math just shot craps.

Despite incessant tax increases, the government just confessed that revenues would be about €11 billion less than expected. The shortfall was spread over VAT, income taxes, and corporate taxes. French pundits are now talking about “fiscal saturation,” the point where raising taxes will lead to lower tax revenues, as struggling households and businesses will jump through hoops to limit the taxes they pay. They might work off the record, cut back on purchases, or move business entities to other countries. One of many brutal disappointments for Hollande. Nothing seems to work. Squeezing the French has reached its limit.

French businesses already pay a total of 64.7% of their pre-tax income in taxes, according to the just released report by the World Bank and PwC (PDF). The report compared 189 countries and measured total taxes paid in 2012 – including income taxes, payroll taxes, employer paid “social" taxes for healthcare and retirement systems, real estate taxes, capital gains taxes, etc. – as a percent of pretax profit. France’s total was the second highest in the EU, after another economic star, Italy, and far above the EU average of 43.1% and the worldwide average of 41.1%.

In France, labor is taxed the most, with employers paying breath-taking 51.7% of their pretax profit in payroll taxes, the worst in the EU and possibly in the universe. Income taxes eat up only 8.7% in pretax profits. As anywhere, sagging profits and a myriad of deductions, loopholes, credits, and other devices allow most companies to get around high tax rates. “Other” taxes consumed another 4.3% of pretax profits.

Confiscatory payroll taxes do one thing very well: stop job creation in its tracks.

Companies are hurting. Of the 15,000 privately held companies that a recent study by accounting and audit association ATH analyzed, 20% lost money in 2012. Over the period between 2008 and 2012, revenues inched up a total of 7%, not even enough to keep up with inflation (8.8%). Net profits plunged 18% during that time. This “permanent degradation” is endangering the survival of many of these companies and is crimping “the investments necessary for the competitiveness and sustainability of these companies," the report observed.

Driven to desperation by the morose economy, the abysmal poll numbers, the tax quagmire, and mounting anger on the street, Hollande’s government is going to attack the problem decisively and head on: another tax reform! This time, Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault wants to start from scratch. A mega project would take up the remaining three and a half years of Hollande’s term. Hope? In the same breath, he said that it would be revenue neutral! They just don’t get it.

Revenue neutral isn't going to help the economy. Households and smaller businesses need room to breathe. Yet, bad as it is, no one believes it. Because in France, taxes have the insidious habit of creeping up relentlessly.

These are among France’s real problems. But now France's Financial Markets Authority decided to hound bloggers who’d dared to doubt the veracity of the sacred balance sheets of the even more sacred French megabanks – including Mike “Mish” Shedlock in the US. It’s getting curiouser and curiouser. Read…. Gagging Doubt: French Crackdown On (American) Bloggers Who Question Megabank Balance Sheets


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/SUXj5ejeePM/story01.htm testosteronepit

Cybersecurity Bill Offered Up as Amendment to NDAA

jay andAs the
Senate Armed Forces Committee works on
the latest iteration of the National Defense Authorization Act,
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va) sees it as a good opportunity to
try again to pass cybersecurity legislation. He has submitted the
Cybersecurity Act of 2013, legislation passed in the Senate
Commerce Committee this summer after the failure of CISPA to gain
momentum. Though the legislation failed to pass Congress this
summer, the president issued an executive order to implement some
of the objectives anyway, or, as the Hill
reports
:

The measure is far more modest than legislation that
Rockefeller and other Senate Democrats backed last year. That bill
would have pressured critical infrastructure companies, such as
banks and power plants, to meet minimum cybersecurity
regulations.

After opposition from Republicans killed last year’s bill,
President Obama issued an executive order instructing the Commerce
Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
to craft voluntary cybersecurity best-practices for critical
infrastructure companies.

Rockefeller’s amendment would codify the executive order into law.
It would also boost cybersecurity education, research and
development for cyber threats. 

The text of the two amendments Rockefeller submitted (among more
than 500 NDAA amendments) can be read here
and here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/cybersecurity-bill-offered-up-as-amendme
via IFTTT