Carl Icahn Lambasts Ackman’s “Rantings Of A Sore Loser”

We earlier discussed Bill Ackman’s lengthy interview on Bloomberg TV during which he faced up to the $500 million losses (more now) from his Herbalife position, and that it is “not a trade” for him but “will take it to the ends of the earth.” However, it seems his comments that “Herbalife longs are all 80-year-old billionaires” pissed off Carl Icahn enough to warrant his wrath. Icahn called in to Trish Regan and exclaimed, “I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser. The stock remains +5% and back near recent record highs.

 

The original Ackman interview “will take Herbalife short to the ends of the earth…”:

ACKMAN HIGHLIGHTS:

-Lost $400-500 million on Herbalife
-Losses are mark-to-market
-‘Lots of ways we can be successful’ on HLF
-Pershing has met with foreign regulators on HLF
-Herbalife re-audit should have been completed by now
-He doesn’t know what FTC is doing on Herbalife
-Re-audit is a short-term catalyst if not done by December
-An Herbalife LBO is more opportunity to go short
-He’ll take Herbalife bet ‘to the end of the earth’
-Herbalife short ‘not a trade for me’
Skeptical of Icahn’s belief in Herbalife long-term
-Puzzled by Bill Stiritz’s Herbalife motivations
-Herbalife fits FTC OCT pyramid warning
-He has data on Herbalife distributor earnings
-Seeks third party auditor on Herbalife retail sales
-Herbalife longs are all 80-year old billionaires.
-He is not short JCPenney
-Hopes JCP becomes a very successful company
-He deserves his share of responsibility for JCP

And Trish Regan and Stephanie Ruhle discuss Icahn’s tempestuous response:

“I fail to understand how Bill Ackman, whom I haven’t spoken to for years, nor do I intend to speak to, would know what I am or am not committed to. I continue to believe Herbalife has a great future, and in my opinion many of the things Ackman says about it are simply the rantings of a sore loser…

 

Interestingly there is something that Ackman and I have in common. Ackman complained at an Oxford conference that every time I went on TV and mentioned Herbalife, the stock went up a few points. Well, that’s also true of him.”

 

We leave it to the chart as the ultimate arbiter of who is winning (so far)…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Os5PBaYXet8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Mythmaking and "Massive Walkouts" at the Warsaw Climate Change Conference

Warsaw Walkout 1Yesterday, a bunch of environmental and social
activists staged what they were pleased to call a “massive” walkout
from the UN climate change conference venue in Warsaw. I watched it
take place and took some cell phone photos,  and then reported
that perhaps a 100 activists, or to be really generous, maybe 150,
had
“massively” walked out
.

I returned on Friday to the conference where I hear it repeated
numerous times by various remaining members of “civil society” that
800 activists had actually joined the walkout. Then I start
googling around and find that some news outlets had reported that
number as being factually so, e.g,. Reuters,

Environment News Service
, and
Grist
. Really?

Warsaw Walkout 2

Amusingly, as I walked into the National Stadium today, I
overhead the following conversation between two young activists
while we three waited to hand over our coats at the cloakroom:

He: I walked out yesterday, did you?

She: Yes, but I had to walk back in almost immediately because
we had meeting with a delegation.

I kid you not.

When I was a reporter in Central America, I was introduced to
the concept of “lying for justice” by some supporters of the
Sandinistas who explained to me that sometimes one had to tell lies
in order to be heard.

Reports exaggerating theatrical performances of this sort are a
disservice to readers, listeners, and viewers of the news.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/mythmaking-and-massive-walkouts-at-warsa
via IFTTT

Mythmaking and “Massive Walkouts” at the Warsaw Climate Change Conference

Warsaw Walkout 1Yesterday, a bunch of environmental and social
activists staged what they were pleased to call a “massive” walkout
from the UN climate change conference venue in Warsaw. I watched it
take place and took some cell phone photos,  and then reported
that perhaps a 100 activists, or to be really generous, maybe 150,
had
“massively” walked out
.

I returned on Friday to the conference where I hear it repeated
numerous times by various remaining members of “civil society” that
800 activists had actually joined the walkout. Then I start
googling around and find that some news outlets had reported that
number as being factually so, e.g,. Reuters,

Environment News Service
, and
Grist
. Really?

Warsaw Walkout 2

Amusingly, as I walked into the National Stadium today, I
overhead the following conversation between two young activists
while we three waited to hand over our coats at the cloakroom:

He: I walked out yesterday, did you?

She: Yes, but I had to walk back in almost immediately because
we had meeting with a delegation.

I kid you not.

When I was a reporter in Central America, I was introduced to
the concept of “lying for justice” by some supporters of the
Sandinistas who explained to me that sometimes one had to tell lies
in order to be heard.

Reports exaggerating theatrical performances of this sort are a
disservice to readers, listeners, and viewers of the news.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/mythmaking-and-massive-walkouts-at-warsa
via IFTTT

The Most Despised Tax-And-Retreat French President Sinks Deeper Into Economic Quagmire

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com   www.amazon.com/author/wolfrichter

The French habitually appear to be on the verge of having had it. But the incidents have been getting denser, more frequent. There were the protests in the Bretagne and elsewhere, followed by "operation snail" where 2,100 heavy trucks drove side by side down major expressways at a snail’s pace, with everyone behind them going nuts. Every day, there are protests organized by different organizations. On Thursday, the farmers went to town, to Paris more specifically. They were getting there by driving their tractors on major highways, setting up roadblocks as they went, snarling traffic for miles.

They’re all protesting the relentless onslaught of new taxes. At first, buoyant from an election victory, President François Hollande and his government went after the rich then quickly hit even modest households, farmers, truckers, craftsmen, everyone who does or buys anything. Because it’s never enough. In January, the Value Added Tax hike will take effect. For the top tier of items, the VAT will only increase from 19.6% to 20%. But for some of the lower tier items, it will be jacked up massively. For example, for the equestrian industry, the VAT will jump from 7% to 20% – hence the protests the other day.

Now the farmers have had it. While at it, they’re also protesting EU rules on how they should run their businesses and anti-pollution laws that would limit the use of tractors on some days. The word "insurrection" is showing up in the media, though it's still more an exaggeration than a description. "Fiscal discontent” is better, but not broad enough.

After 18 months in office, Hollande's ratings have plunged to the lowest levels of any president since 1958, according to an Ifop/JDD poll, the only poll going back this far. A mere 20% of the French were satisfied with him; 17% among workers and employees; 15% among merchants and craftsmen. Even his erstwhile supporters have abandoned him.

And 79% were dissatisfied. Cited were "social desperation" of the people affected by his policies, but also his leadership qualities, his apparent "inability to decide," his "lack of discipline," his tendency to make decisions and then, when the volume gets too loud, withdraw them. It leaves the country rudderless.

Who could do a better job? Maybe Santa Claus.

Because no one else seems to be able to, in the eyes of the French. Turns out, 74% think that any of the major figures of the UMP, the party of former President Sarkozy, would do worse or no better. And on the right-wing where Marine Le Pen reigns with her National Front (FN)? 79% of the respondents think she’d be worse or no better than Hollande. There simply is no savior in sight. Much less a solution.

Spending by the government accounts for more than 56% of GDP, the highest in the Eurozone. Even thinking about cutting these outlays would be political hara-kiri. To fund this public mastodon and bring the deficit down to 3% of GDP by 2015, and into compliance with EU stability criteria – it would require a miracle – taxes must be extracted from everyone and everything in the anemic private sector.

But the math just shot craps.

Despite incessant tax increases, the government just confessed that revenues would be about €11 billion less than expected. The shortfall was spread over VAT, income taxes, and corporate taxes. French pundits are now talking about “fiscal saturation,” the point where raising taxes will lead to lower tax revenues, as struggling households and businesses will jump through hoops to limit the taxes they pay. They might work off the record, cut back on purchases, or move business entities to other countries. One of many brutal disappointments for Hollande. Nothing seems to work. Squeezing the French has reached its limit.

French businesses already pay a total of 64.7% of their pre-tax income in taxes, according to the just released report by the World Bank and PwC (PDF). The report compared 189 countries and measured total taxes paid in 2012 – including income taxes, payroll taxes, employer paid “social" taxes for healthcare and retirement systems, real estate taxes, capital gains taxes, etc. – as a percent of pretax profit. France’s total was the second highest in the EU, after another economic star, Italy, and far above the EU average of 43.1% and the worldwide average of 41.1%.

In France, labor is taxed the most, with employers paying breath-taking 51.7% of their pretax profit in payroll taxes, the worst in the EU and possibly in the universe. Income taxes eat up only 8.7% in pretax profits. As anywhere, sagging profits and a myriad of deductions, loopholes, credits, and other devices allow most companies to get around high tax rates. “Other” taxes consumed another 4.3% of pretax profits.

Confiscatory payroll taxes do one thing very well: stop job creation in its tracks.

Companies are hurting. Of the 15,000 privately held companies that a recent study by accounting and audit association ATH analyzed, 20% lost money in 2012. Over the period between 2008 and 2012, revenues inched up a total of 7%, not even enough to keep up with inflation (8.8%). Net profits plunged 18% during that time. This “permanent degradation” is endangering the survival of many of these companies and is crimping “the investments necessary for the competitiveness and sustainability of these companies," the report observed.

Driven to desperation by the morose economy, the abysmal poll numbers, the tax quagmire, and mounting anger on the street, Hollande’s government is going to attack the problem decisively and head on: another tax reform! This time, Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault wants to start from scratch. A mega project would take up the remaining three and a half years of Hollande’s term. Hope? In the same breath, he said that it would be revenue neutral! They just don’t get it.

Revenue neutral isn't going to help the economy. Households and smaller businesses need room to breathe. Yet, bad as it is, no one believes it. Because in France, taxes have the insidious habit of creeping up relentlessly.

These are among France’s real problems. But now France's Financial Markets Authority decided to hound bloggers who’d dared to doubt the veracity of the sacred balance sheets of the even more sacred French megabanks – including Mike “Mish” Shedlock in the US. It’s getting curiouser and curiouser. Read…. Gagging Doubt: French Crackdown On (American) Bloggers Who Question Megabank Balance Sheets


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/SUXj5ejeePM/story01.htm testosteronepit

Cybersecurity Bill Offered Up as Amendment to NDAA

jay andAs the
Senate Armed Forces Committee works on
the latest iteration of the National Defense Authorization Act,
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va) sees it as a good opportunity to
try again to pass cybersecurity legislation. He has submitted the
Cybersecurity Act of 2013, legislation passed in the Senate
Commerce Committee this summer after the failure of CISPA to gain
momentum. Though the legislation failed to pass Congress this
summer, the president issued an executive order to implement some
of the objectives anyway, or, as the Hill
reports
:

The measure is far more modest than legislation that
Rockefeller and other Senate Democrats backed last year. That bill
would have pressured critical infrastructure companies, such as
banks and power plants, to meet minimum cybersecurity
regulations.

After opposition from Republicans killed last year’s bill,
President Obama issued an executive order instructing the Commerce
Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
to craft voluntary cybersecurity best-practices for critical
infrastructure companies.

Rockefeller’s amendment would codify the executive order into law.
It would also boost cybersecurity education, research and
development for cyber threats. 

The text of the two amendments Rockefeller submitted (among more
than 500 NDAA amendments) can be read here
and here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/cybersecurity-bill-offered-up-as-amendme
via IFTTT

Chinese Reportedly Fly First Stealth Drone

Yesterday,
I wrote about
a number of European nations that have formed a
“drone club,” which aims to develop UAVs that can compete with
American and Israeli drones. In the same post I briefly mentioned
the Chinese Wing Loong drone, which bears some resemblance to the
American Predator drone, leading some analysts to conclude that
Chinese espionage may have played a role in its development.

Today, there is more drone news. According to Chinese state
media
, the Chinese flew a stealth drone for the first time
yesterday, the latest example of Chinese military development,
which U.S. officials believe is changing the security situation in
the Pacific. The most recent annual report from the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review
Commission
(USCC), released on Wednesday, says the following
(PLA stands for “People’s Liberation Army”):

PLA modernization is altering the security balance in the Asia
Pacific, challenging decades of U.S. military preeminence in the
region.

The U.S. is understandably wary of recent Chinese military
developments, especially given American military presence and
diplomatic obligations in Asia and the Pacific. The USCC report
highlighted the Hongzha-6K bomber, which the Chinese air force
received in June, that is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and
of reaching Guam.

From the USCC report (LACM stands for “land attack cruise
missiles”):

In June 2013, the PLA Air Force began to receive new Hongzha- 6K
(H–6K) bomber aircraft. The H–6K has an extended range and can
carry China’s new long-range LACM. The bomber/LACM weapon system
provides the PLA Air Force with the ability to conduct conventional
strikes against regional targets throughout the Western Pacific,
including U.S. facilities in Guam. Although the H–6K airframe could
be modified to carry a nuclear-tipped air-launched LACM, and
China’s LACMs likely have the ability to carry a nuclear warhead,
there is no evidence to confirm China is deploying nuclear warheads
on any of its air-launched LACMs.

The ongoing dispute between
China and U.S. ally Japan over uninhabited islands puts the U.S. in
an awkward position. Last year,
I wrote
on how Hugh White, professor of strategic studies at
the Australian National University, believes the U.S. could get
dragged into whatever conflict that could result from this
territorial conflict escalating.

Last month, a
The New York Times
wrote an article on White and the views
he outlines in his book
The China Choice: Why America Should Share Power
.
White believes that conflict between the U.S and China is a
possibility if China and the U.S. continue to try and assert
themselves as the dominant power in the Pacific:

If the two countries continue to compete for primacy in the
Pacific, a new Cold War — or worse, an open conflict — will be the
result, he says. Many American analysts agree that conflict between
China and the United States is possible, maybe increasingly likely.
But few buy the argument that the United States is losing ground to
China and must consider a power-sharing arrangement to avoid
war.

“The strategic rivalry between the United States and China is
driven by their different and incompatible roles in the region,”
Mr. White said during a recent visit to Beijing, where he spoke to
several academic groups, including a generally favorable audience
organized by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. “The principal
aim of the United States is to preserve American primacy in Asia.
China conversely wants, as a minimum objective, at least an equal
role with United States. Primacy for the United States, equality
for China — they are inherently incompatible.”

It of course remains to be seen if the far-from-ideal
relationship between China and Japan will drag the U.S. into a new
conflict. But if it does, China’s recent military developments will
ensure that the conflict will be quite different to the sort of war
the U.S. has been waging since the beginning of the 21st
century

For more from Reason.com on China and drones here and here.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/22/chinese-reportedly-flies-first-stealth-d
via IFTTT

Hugh Hendry Capitulates: "Can't Look At Himself In The Mirror" As He Throws In The Towel, Turns Bullish

“I cannot look at myself in the mirror; everything I have believed in I have had to reject. This environment only makes sense through the prism of trends.”

      – Hugh Hendry

First David Rosenberg, now Hugh Hendry: one after another the bears are throwing in the towel.

As Investment Week reports, speaking at Harrington Cooper’s 2013 conference this morning, Hugh Hendry said “he is no longer fighting the two-way feedback loop which is continuing to boost risk assets.” The reflexive feedback loop envisioned by Hendry is the following and centres on the currency war being played out between the US and China, “in which US QE prompts dollar-denominated investment to head to China, and China fights the resulting upwards pressure on its currency by manufacturing an investment boom. Hendry said this creates a “global supply glut”, leading to falling US inflation expectations (as this supply far outweights US domestic demand) – which in turn prompts the Federal Reserve to loosen policy once again.” Rinse. Repeat.

Of course, there is a limitation here as we have explained previously, namely the amount of “high-quality collateral” which the Fed and the other central banks can and are rapidly soaking up, in the process destroying bond market liquidity, but that “discovery” will be made by the Fed far too late, despite even the repeated warnings of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee.

And since Hendry is constrained by daily, monthly and annual P&L, he simply does not have luxury of waiting for the “fat tail” event, which incidentally will be quite terminal and thus hardly profitable for anyone exposed to fiat-denominated assets.

So the end result is that Hugh Hendry is merely the latest bear to throw in the towel:

“I can no longer say I am bearish. When markets become parabolic, the people who exist within them are trend followers, because the guys who are qualitative have got taken out,” Hendry said.

“I have been prepared to underperform for the fun of being proved right when markets crash. But that could be in three-and-a-half-years’ time.”

“I cannot look at myself in the mirror; everything I have believed in I have had to reject. This environment only makes sense through the prism of trends.”

So what does the newly christened “bull” like?

Though he first began turning more positive on the likes of US and Japanese equities last year, Hendry suggested this morning the current environment created more counter-intuitive opportunities. “This applies to European banks, Greek equities, Spanish equities. You have got to be in things that are trending,” he said.

 

The manager’s Eclectica Absolute Macro fund had a 64% value at risk equity allocation in September, up from 45% in August, with December 2013 Japanese TOPIX index futures his biggest single holding on a VaR basis.

 

Addressing attendees this morning, Hendry said his comments would take on a “confessional” tone, and admitted his performance over the past year had been “at best, mediocre”. Hendry’s CF Eclectica Absolute Macro fund has lost 2.6% in the nine months to 30 September, according to the firm.

In other words the “dash for trash” mentality, which we predicted in September 2012 when we forecast that the most shorted stocks would outperform the market (and they have), has just won another convert. That, and of course, Fed-balance sheet induced momentum chasing, in which the only thing that matters is one’s view how many “assets” the Fed will hold at any point in the future (see from April: “Bernanke & Kuroda Capital LLC: Overweight S&P 500, 2013 Target 1950“).

Finally, Hendry’s “come to Bernanke” moment does not come easily:

The manager acknowledged his changing stance may be viewed by some investors as a ‘top of the market’ signal, but said he is not concerned by the prospect of a crash.

 

“I may be providing a public utility here, as the last bear to capitulate. You are well within your rights to say ‘sell’. The S&P 500 is up 30% over the past year: I wish I had thought this last year.”

 

Crashing is the least of my concerns. I can deal with that, but I cannot risk my reputation because we are in this virtuous loop where the market is trending.”

Sadly, his last statement is just the latest confirmation that in the New Centrally-Planned Normal, FOMO or Fear of Missing Out (the trend, the year end bonus, you name it) is indeed the new POMO as we warned in May.

And like that, everyone is now on the same side of the boat.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/2VGgVDEKqNQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Hugh Hendry Capitulates: “Can’t Look At Himself In The Mirror” As He Throws In The Towel, Turns Bullish

“I cannot look at myself in the mirror; everything I have believed in I have had to reject. This environment only makes sense through the prism of trends.”

      – Hugh Hendry

First David Rosenberg, now Hugh Hendry: one after another the bears are throwing in the towel.

As Investment Week reports, speaking at Harrington Cooper’s 2013 conference this morning, Hugh Hendry said “he is no longer fighting the two-way feedback loop which is continuing to boost risk assets.” The reflexive feedback loop envisioned by Hendry is the following and centres on the currency war being played out between the US and China, “in which US QE prompts dollar-denominated investment to head to China, and China fights the resulting upwards pressure on its currency by manufacturing an investment boom. Hendry said this creates a “global supply glut”, leading to falling US inflation expectations (as this supply far outweights US domestic demand) – which in turn prompts the Federal Reserve to loosen policy once again.” Rinse. Repeat.

Of course, there is a limitation here as we have explained previously, namely the amount of “high-quality collateral” which the Fed and the other central banks can and are rapidly soaking up, in the process destroying bond market liquidity, but that “discovery” will be made by the Fed far too late, despite even the repeated warnings of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee.

And since Hendry is constrained by daily, monthly and annual P&L, he simply does not have luxury of waiting for the “fat tail” event, which incidentally will be quite terminal and thus hardly profitable for anyone exposed to fiat-denominated assets.

So the end result is that Hugh Hendry is merely the latest bear to throw in the towel:

“I can no longer say I am bearish. When markets become parabolic, the people who exist within them are trend followers, because the guys who are qualitative have got taken out,” Hendry said.

“I have been prepared to underperform for the fun of being proved right when markets crash. But that could be in three-and-a-half-years’ time.”

“I cannot look at myself in the mirror; everything I have believed in I have had to reject. This environment only makes sense through the prism of trends.”

So what does the newly christened “bull” like?

Though he first began turning more positive on the likes of US and Japanese equities last year, Hendry suggested this morning the current environment created more counter-intuitive opportunities. “This applies to European banks, Greek equities, Spanish equities. You have got to be in things that are trending,” he said.

 

The manager’s Eclectica Absolute Macro fund had a 64% value at risk equity allocation in September, up from 45% in August, with December 2013 Japanese TOPIX index futures his biggest single holding on a VaR basis.

 

Addressing attendees this morning, Hendry said his comments would take on a “confessional” tone, and admitted his performance over the past year had been “at best, mediocre”. Hendry’s CF Eclectica Absolute Macro fund has lost 2.6% in the nine months to 30 September, according to the firm.

In other words the “dash for trash” mentality, which we predicted in September 2012 when we forecast that the most shorted stocks would outperform the market (and they have), has just won another convert. That, and of course, Fed-balance sheet induced momentum chasing, in which the only thing that matters is one’s view how many “assets” the Fed will hold at any point in the future (see from April: “Bernanke & Kuroda Capital LLC: Overweight S&P 500, 2013 Target 1950“).

Finally, Hendry’s “come to Bernanke” moment does not come easily:

The manager acknowledged his changing stance may be viewed by some investors as a ‘top of the market’ signal, but said he is not concerned by the prospect of a crash.

 

“I may be providing a public utility here, as the last bear to capitulate. You are well within your rights to say ‘sell’. The S&P 500 is up 30% over the past year: I wish I had thought this last year.”

 

Crashing is the least of my concerns. I can deal with that, but I cannot risk my reputation because we are in this virtuous loop where the market is trending.”

Sadly, his last statement is just the latest confirmation that in the New Centrally-Planned Normal, FOMO or Fear of Missing Out (the trend, the year end bonus, you name it) is indeed the new POMO as we warned in May.

And like that, everyone is now on the same side of the boat.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/2VGgVDEKqNQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Bitcoin Or A Bank? Here's How They Stack Up

Submitted by Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The following graphic was put together by the folks at Promontory Financial and is extremely telling. It looks at three ways in which a U.S. citizen might choose to go about sending a $1,000 downpayment to Europe for the purpose of renting a vacation home. They put Bitcoin side by with with a traditional bank wire as well as a credit card transaction. The results might surprise you…

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/dyWP5uxSKPk/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Bitcoin Or A Bank? Here’s How They Stack Up

Submitted by Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The following graphic was put together by the folks at Promontory Financial and is extremely telling. It looks at three ways in which a U.S. citizen might choose to go about sending a $1,000 downpayment to Europe for the purpose of renting a vacation home. They put Bitcoin side by with with a traditional bank wire as well as a credit card transaction. The results might surprise you…

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/dyWP5uxSKPk/story01.htm Tyler Durden