The Definitive Proof That QE Doesn't Create Jobs

 

 

For over four years now, the mainstream media continues to parrot the Federal Reserve’s assertion that QE is in fact a monetary tool that will create jobs.

 

This assertion overlooks Japan, where QE efforts equal to over 25% of GDP have failed to improve the unemployment situation significantly, as well as the UK where QE efforts equal to over 20% of GDP have proven similarly ineffective.

 

We now can definitively add the US to the list of QE failures.

 

It’s been 14 months since the Fed announced QE 3 and nearly 12 months since it announced QE 4: both open ended programs that have run continuously since they were announced.

 

And yet through this period the employment population ratio (which measures the percentage of working age adults who are in fact employed) has in fact FALLEN.

 

 

The above graph shows in clear terms that the US is not creating jobs at a rate that can account for population growth. QE 3 and QE 4 have failed to have any significant effect. In fact, if you consider that the chart has dropped dramatically in the last quarter (giving QE 3 and QE 4 a year to have an effect) one can definitively say that QE has been a total failure as far as jobs growth is concerned.

 

This is nothing new. If you look at the five-year chart you cannot with a straight face say QE has succeeded in any meaningful way.

 

 

QE does not create jobs. It has been a total failure. And yet, five years after the Fed embarked on this policy we continue to hear people talk about how the real problem is that we need MORE QE.

 

QE failed for Japan. It has failed for the UK. It ha failed for the US. Collectively, countries comprising over a third of the world’s GDP have proven QE doesn’t work.

 

For a FREE Special Report outlining how to protect your portfolio a market collapse, swing by: http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html

 

Best Regards,

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

 

 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/9dSmKIU6qD8/story01.htm Phoenix Capital Research

The Definitive Proof That QE Doesn’t Create Jobs

 

 

For over four years now, the mainstream media continues to parrot the Federal Reserve’s assertion that QE is in fact a monetary tool that will create jobs.

 

This assertion overlooks Japan, where QE efforts equal to over 25% of GDP have failed to improve the unemployment situation significantly, as well as the UK where QE efforts equal to over 20% of GDP have proven similarly ineffective.

 

We now can definitively add the US to the list of QE failures.

 

It’s been 14 months since the Fed announced QE 3 and nearly 12 months since it announced QE 4: both open ended programs that have run continuously since they were announced.

 

And yet through this period the employment population ratio (which measures the percentage of working age adults who are in fact employed) has in fact FALLEN.

 

 

The above graph shows in clear terms that the US is not creating jobs at a rate that can account for population growth. QE 3 and QE 4 have failed to have any significant effect. In fact, if you consider that the chart has dropped dramatically in the last quarter (giving QE 3 and QE 4 a year to have an effect) one can definitively say that QE has been a total failure as far as jobs growth is concerned.

 

This is nothing new. If you look at the five-year chart you cannot with a straight face say QE has succeeded in any meaningful way.

 

 

QE does not create jobs. It has been a total failure. And yet, five years after the Fed embarked on this policy we continue to hear people talk about how the real problem is that we need MORE QE.

 

QE failed for Japan. It has failed for the UK. It ha failed for the US. Collectively, countries comprising over a third of the world’s GDP have proven QE doesn’t work.

 

For a FREE Special Report outlining how to protect your portfolio a market collapse, swing by: http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html

 

Best Regards,

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

 

 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/9dSmKIU6qD8/story01.htm Phoenix Capital Research

The Definitive Proof That QE Doesn't Create Jobs

 

 

For over four years now, the mainstream media continues to parrot the Federal Reserve’s assertion that QE is in fact a monetary tool that will create jobs.

 

This assertion overlooks Japan, where QE efforts equal to over 25% of GDP have failed to improve the unemployment situation significantly, as well as the UK where QE efforts equal to over 20% of GDP have proven similarly ineffective.

 

We now can definitively add the US to the list of QE failures.

 

It’s been 14 months since the Fed announced QE 3 and nearly 12 months since it announced QE 4: both open ended programs that have run continuously since they were announced.

 

And yet through this period the employment population ratio (which measures the percentage of working age adults who are in fact employed) has in fact FALLEN.

 

 

The above graph shows in clear terms that the US is not creating jobs at a rate that can account for population growth. QE 3 and QE 4 have failed to have any significant effect. In fact, if you consider that the chart has dropped dramatically in the last quarter (giving QE 3 and QE 4 a year to have an effect) one can definitively say that QE has been a total failure as far as jobs growth is concerned.

 

This is nothing new. If you look at the five-year chart you cannot with a straight face say QE has succeeded in any meaningful way.

 

 

QE does not create jobs. It has been a total failure. And yet, five years after the Fed embarked on this policy we continue to hear people talk about how the real problem is that we need MORE QE.

 

QE failed for Japan. It has failed for the UK. It ha failed for the US. Collectively, countries comprising over a third of the world’s GDP have proven QE doesn’t work.

 

For a FREE Special Report outlining how to protect your portfolio a market collapse, swing by: http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html

 

Best Regards,

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

 

 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nLODMI2qmOI/story01.htm Phoenix Capital Research

The Definitive Proof That QE Doesn’t Create Jobs

 

 

For over four years now, the mainstream media continues to parrot the Federal Reserve’s assertion that QE is in fact a monetary tool that will create jobs.

 

This assertion overlooks Japan, where QE efforts equal to over 25% of GDP have failed to improve the unemployment situation significantly, as well as the UK where QE efforts equal to over 20% of GDP have proven similarly ineffective.

 

We now can definitively add the US to the list of QE failures.

 

It’s been 14 months since the Fed announced QE 3 and nearly 12 months since it announced QE 4: both open ended programs that have run continuously since they were announced.

 

And yet through this period the employment population ratio (which measures the percentage of working age adults who are in fact employed) has in fact FALLEN.

 

 

The above graph shows in clear terms that the US is not creating jobs at a rate that can account for population growth. QE 3 and QE 4 have failed to have any significant effect. In fact, if you consider that the chart has dropped dramatically in the last quarter (giving QE 3 and QE 4 a year to have an effect) one can definitively say that QE has been a total failure as far as jobs growth is concerned.

 

This is nothing new. If you look at the five-year chart you cannot with a straight face say QE has succeeded in any meaningful way.

 

 

QE does not create jobs. It has been a total failure. And yet, five years after the Fed embarked on this policy we continue to hear people talk about how the real problem is that we need MORE QE.

 

QE failed for Japan. It has failed for the UK. It ha failed for the US. Collectively, countries comprising over a third of the world’s GDP have proven QE doesn’t work.

 

For a FREE Special Report outlining how to protect your portfolio a market collapse, swing by: http://phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/special-reports.html

 

Best Regards,

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

 

 

 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/nLODMI2qmOI/story01.htm Phoenix Capital Research

Turkey Gold Demand Spikes To 8-Year High (As Price Drops)

As gold prices have fallen, yet another nation is choosing to use the drop to build its reserves. As Bloomberg notes, Turkey’s gold imports that doubled this year are set to reach the highest level since 2005 as the metal’s price heads for the first annual drop in 13 years. As Commerzbank notes “there seems to be a lot of interest in physical gold at the current low price,” as Turkey imported 251.4 metric tons of gold since January – the biggest tonnage increase since at least 1995 (a rate almost 60% more than 2012’s average monthly rate). Turkey was the fourth-largest buyer of gold last year, after India, China and the U.S., World Gold Council data show.

 

 

Source: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/v6lL7cOD4HA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

20 Years of Political Correctness: Q/A with Jonathan Rauch

“20 Years of Political Correctness: Q/A with Jonathan Rauch” is
the latest offering from Reason TV. 

Watch above or click on the link below for video, full text,
supporting links, downloadable versions and, and more Reason TV
clips.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/08/20-years-of-political-correctness-qa-wit
via IFTTT

Chicago Cop Cleared in Shooting of Unarmed Man, His Third Shooting in Six Months, City Already Settled With Family for $4 Million

shot by copEarlier this year, the city of Chicago
settled
with the family of Flint Farmer, who was shot by
Officer Gildardo Sierra in June 2011, for $4.1 million but made no
admission of guilt. Sierra fired 16 rounds, hitting the unarmed
Farmer seven times. It was Sierra’s third shooting, and second
fatal shooting, in six months. The officer admitted to having been
drinking before coming into work. A dashboard cam caught
video
of a part of the shooting, which appeared to show Sierra
shooting Farmer in the back as Farmer lay on the ground. At the
time the city’s police superintendent, Garry McCarthy, said the
shooting was a “big problem” and that the department shouldn’t have
sent Sierra back on the streets after the first two shootings.

Nevertheless, prosecutors cleared Sierra in the Farmer shooting,
accepting the officer’s claim that he feared for his life and
insisting the situation was more complicated than the video
suggested.
Via the

Chicago Tribune
:

The prosecutors said although the videotape of the
shooting was damning, showing muzzle flashes and suggesting Sierra
stood over Farmer as he shot him in the back, the continued
investigation yielded forensic and other evidence that led the
prosecutors to conclude that the incident was more complex.

“The video is actually somewhat maddening,” [Assistant State’s
Attorney] Trutenko said. “It’s why we run out every ground
ball.”

Proscutors said the fact Sierra admitted to drinking “multiple”
beers before coming to work, after lying about it, wasn’t crucial;
police didn’t test Sierra for alcohol until at least 5 hours later,
and say he got a zero. Sierra says he mistook a burgundy cellphone
he says Farmer, who fled from police after a domestic disturbance
call, pointed at him. Prosecutors s ay they found evidence to back
Sierra’s story.
Via the Tribune again
:

Prosecutors pointed to several key pieces of evidence
in deciding against charging the officer. One was a wound to
Farmer’s right hand that suggested he was pointing his arm at
Sierra when he was shot. Prosecutors believe that was one of the
first shots, if not the first, to hit him. In addition, DNA tests
showed that blood on Farmer’s phone was his, suggesting he was
holding the phone when shot. The other shots followed, with the
last three hitting Farmer in the back.

Prosecutors said their investigation showed that all 16 shots — all
that Sierra’s Sig Sauer semi-automatic handgun could hold — were
fired within 4.2 seconds as Sierra moved laterally from the street
to the sidewalk, the gun ejecting the spent shells as he moved.
That allowed prosecutors to chart a probable sequence of events and
also to understand that Sierra was reacting rapidly under dark and
difficult conditions.

Sierra told investigators he feared for his life because he
believed Farmer had a gun. Under state law, police officers can
continue firing at a suspect until they believe the threat has
ended.

Illinois has some of the strictest gun control laws in the
country, yet its rules of engagement for police aren’t. It’s a
tacit admission that its gun control laws don’t work, allowing cops
to keep shooting based merely on their belief of a threat.

Coupled with the job security provided by generous public union
contracts (Sierra will likely remain on the job, if not in the
streets), the permissiveness toward police shootings can breed a
highly aggressive attitude among police officers, as witnessed with
Sierra.  The city of Chicago set aside a whopping $27 million
in taxpayer money to settle police brutality claims in 2013, and

blew
through that money by March.
At the same time
, the police union was demanding a 12 percent
pay raise and bonuses for having to live in the city of Chicago,
while the police department said it couldn’t afford to respond to
every 911 call.

The justice system, then, defers to police officers in cases of
deadly force, while the police union restricts the department from
taking the kind of severe disciplinary measures that might increase
the perceived cost to the police officer of doing something like
firing 16 rounds in 4 seconds. As it stands, the costs are
shouldered by the victims, and in the case of settlements, by the
taxpayers too.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/08/chicago-cop-cleared-in-shooting-of-unarm
via IFTTT

The Stunning Magic Of "New Normal" Hedge Fund Leverage

The following chart, from the Balyasny Asset Management Q3 letter to investors, show just that: the magic of hedge fund leverage in the New Normal.

Specifically, it shows that while BAM’s AUM from 2010 until Q3 2013 has increased only modestly (light blue), it is the dark blue bar portion that shows just how much “purchasing power”, i.e., allocation, has been deployed by the fund, thanks to the good graces of its Prime Brokers, who have allowed it expand its leverage from 100% to nearly 500%! Compare this to the peak leverage in the old normal which was roughly half: yes, that was at a time when the so-called credit bubble exploded. It has now doubled.

From BAM:

During our soft-close period over the last two years, we have doubled the size of our allocations and our balance sheet while keeping AUM roughly the same. Our plan is to accept only enough new capital to allow us to keep our assets / notional dollars allocated ratio at 1 to 5.

 

We find that portfolio managers on average utilize about 70-80% of their maximum allocations – so $1 of assets to $5 in notional allocated dollars typically results in our target gross leverage of 3.5-4x. We will be very disciplined with this so please let us know as early as possible if you are interested in increasing your allocation next year.

Of course, when one is levered nearly 5x, being “very disciplined” is usually a good idea.

But who would be on the hook should things turn south, and the massive leverage blows up in the face of Balyasny and its LPs? Not Balyasny of course, but the Prime Brokers who provided the fund with 5x leverage. Prime Brokers who just happen to be the same TBTF banks that were bailed out last time around, and which will have to be bailed out once again as soon as the Bernanke levitation finally ends.

But most importantly, the chart shows quite clearly that without any new equity injections in the market, the one and only source of incremental “capital” injected into risk assets is, you guessed it, debt.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bRExCAokePU/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The Stunning Magic Of “New Normal” Hedge Fund Leverage

The following chart, from the Balyasny Asset Management Q3 letter to investors, show just that: the magic of hedge fund leverage in the New Normal.

Specifically, it shows that while BAM’s AUM from 2010 until Q3 2013 has increased only modestly (light blue), it is the dark blue bar portion that shows just how much “purchasing power”, i.e., allocation, has been deployed by the fund, thanks to the good graces of its Prime Brokers, who have allowed it expand its leverage from 100% to nearly 500%! Compare this to the peak leverage in the old normal which was roughly half: yes, that was at a time when the so-called credit bubble exploded. It has now doubled.

From BAM:

During our soft-close period over the last two years, we have doubled the size of our allocations and our balance sheet while keeping AUM roughly the same. Our plan is to accept only enough new capital to allow us to keep our assets / notional dollars allocated ratio at 1 to 5.

 

We find that portfolio managers on average utilize about 70-80% of their maximum allocations – so $1 of assets to $5 in notional allocated dollars typically results in our target gross leverage of 3.5-4x. We will be very disciplined with this so please let us know as early as possible if you are interested in increasing your allocation next year.

Of course, when one is levered nearly 5x, being “very disciplined” is usually a good idea.

But who would be on the hook should things turn south, and the massive leverage blows up in the face of Balyasny and its LPs? Not Balyasny of course, but the Prime Brokers who provided the fund with 5x leverage. Prime Brokers who just happen to be the same TBTF banks that were bailed out last time around, and which will have to be bailed out once again as soon as the Bernanke levitation finally ends.

But most importantly, the chart shows quite clearly that without any new equity injections in the market, the one and only source of incremental “capital” injected into risk assets is, you guessed it, debt.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/bRExCAokePU/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Boy With a Purse Causes School Freakout

The purse goes well with his totally fierce belt, but I'm not sold on the hoodie.13-year-old Skyler Davis, an
8th-grader in Anderson County Junior-Senior School in Garnett,
Kansas, just wants to wear his Vera Bradley purse to class, but
some folks are just being jerks about it.

Based on coverage from KCTV in Kansas, it doesn’t appear as
though the problem is bullying from other students. Even Skyler’s
own brother is on his side. It’s school officials who are telling
him he can’t wear his purse in class, going so far as to suspend
him. From
KCTV
:

His furious mother says it is discrimination because girls are
allowed to have purses with no repercussions.

“I don’t think everyone should be treated differently,” Skyler
Davis said Wednesday. “Everyone should have the same
privileges.”

Anderson County School District Superintendent Don Blome said
Thursday that he could not discuss the specific case because of
privacy concerns. However, he said all students, whether female or
male, are prevented from having bags, purses, satchels and
backpacks in the core classrooms like English and math. The bags
must be stored in lockers during class time, he said.

Mom couldn’t find anything in the school manual about storing
purses or bags in lockers. Skyler said he’d been wearing the purse
for a while with no problems. Unfortunately despite interviewing
the family, KCTV didn’t seem to attempt to check with any female
students who attended school there to verify that Skyler was being
singled out. The superintendent insisted the bag policy has been in
place for years, but that just makes it stranger that it’s not in
the student manual; not that it actually matters because the rule
is stupid in the first place.

Vera Bradley is taking advantage of the publicity and contacted
KCTV to offer Skyler some more bags. Unfortunately for him, the
school is insisting on not letting him carry his purse to
class:

[Skyler’s mom Leslie] Willis said she was told that the
suspension wouldn’t be lifted until Skyler stops wearing the purse,
which he had said on Wednesday that he wouldn’t do.

But with some time to reflect, the teen is unlikely to dig in
his heels forever.

“We’re going to have to find some compromise in this,” his
mother said. She didn’t detail what that could be.

Why not check out Kansas charter
schools
, Mom?

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/08/boy-with-a-purse-causes-school-freakout
via IFTTT