After establishing its Vision Fund as the world’s preeminent marginal investor in Silicon Valley’s most overhyped (and overvalued) startups, SoftBank, its CEO Masayoshi Son and its Middle Eastern backers have settled on a time-tested strategy for locking in profits even if the startups they’ve backed never realize profits, as some have warned might be the case.
That strategy? Dumping their shares on unsuspecting retail investors.
That’s right. According to the Wall Street Journal, in what would be an unprecedented move for a venture fund with an international reach, SoftBank is reportedly considering an IPO for its $100 billion Vision Fund. The Japanese telecoms conglomerate with a massive VC arm is also reportedly in talks with the Sultanate of Oman to secure an additional investment in its existing fund. Masayoshi Son also recently visited China to discuss potential investments in the Vision Fund worth several billion dollars.
And, if the offering goes through, the firm is already drawing up plans to launch a second ‘Vision Fund’ after the original allocated all of its capital in private investment deals involving Uber, WeWork and others in under two years.
SoftBank is considering audacious fundraising plans, including a public offering of its $100 billion investment fund and the launch of a second fund of at least that size, as it looks to seize on an exploding startup scene, people familiar with the matter said.
More immediately, SoftBank is negotiating with the sultanate of Oman for an investment of several billion dollars in its existing $100 billion Vision Fund, which raised nearly all its cash from Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, the people said.
The fund’s staff is hustling to keep up with the frantic pace of deal making by SoftBank founder and Chief Executive Masayoshi Son, who has invested nearly all the money that the Vision Fund took in just two years ago.
Highlighting the need for new funds: Mr. Son recently returned from China, where he negotiated informal deals worth several billion dollars that the Vision Fund doesn’t yet have, one of the people said.
It’s difficult to imagine that the IPO would be anything other than a desperate exit strategy for SoftBank, considering recent reports that the firm’s backers in Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi have reportedly expressed reservations about Masayoshi Son’s investment strategy, complaining that he had made reckless investments at valuations that many felt were too high. And Uber, one of the fund’s most visible investments, has already cut its planned valuation at IPO twice.
The news comes just weeks after WSJ reported that Masayoshi Son lost $130 million of his personal fortune after buying into bitcoin at the top of the 2017 bubble, then selling while prices were crashing.
But in a sign that some will interpret a Vision Fund as a sign that the rally is only just getting started, let’s look at the recent trend: Tesla shares climbed after the company returned to the market to plug a massive hole in its balance sheet (which will still leave it incapable of investing more in capex), and Beyond Meat, a company with no profits to speak of, soared 150% during its trading debut.
In other words: If SoftBank wins regulatory approval for the deal, retail traders will likely be more than happy to supply an escape hatch.
via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2J2QZW7 Tyler Durden
The former “it” comedy of irresponsible American absurdism, Arrested Development, has lost its cultural cachet. Netflix used the program to experiment with outreach to pop-culture elites by resurrecting it when Fox dropped it after three seasons. And while that move generated a lot of hype, the second half of its fifth and likely final season dropped in March to resounding silence. Dumped in the endless slurry of new Netflix content, it disappeared without a trace.
That’s a shame. Perhaps a sly and shameless comedy about a family of feckless grifters in the construction trades with a yen for colluding with foreign tyrants seems unappealing now. Maybe wealthy white loons driven by their own absurd character flaws and tragicomically bad parenting just aren’t funny anymore.
Yet Arrested Development‘s telling of the Bluth family saga remained a strong stew of silly, brilliant, and ridiculously baroque storytelling to the end. The show itself recognizes the difficulty of competing with political reality and keeps its narrative set before 2016. But it also toys with that dilemma, inserting occasional dramatic ironies—even beyond the season’s central plot involving a troubled attempt to build a border wall.
The border wall storyline was not, in fact, designed to mock Donald Trump; it began way back in 2013. With Arrested Development, topicality is beside the point. It’s at its best relying on thickly delivered character comedy, crazy misunderstandings, and smart satire. The youngest Bluth’s “inspirational” speech to his fraudulent privacy software company—in which he invites employees to turn the stress-knots they wake up with in their stomachs into “Why-knots?”—deserves to define the digital age as much as any comedy.
from Latest – Reason.com http://bit.ly/2GU5oQG
via IFTTT
The former “it” comedy of irresponsible American absurdism, Arrested Development, has lost its cultural cachet. Netflix used the program to experiment with outreach to pop-culture elites by resurrecting it when Fox dropped it after three seasons. And while that move generated a lot of hype, the second half of its fifth and likely final season dropped in March to resounding silence. Dumped in the endless slurry of new Netflix content, it disappeared without a trace.
That’s a shame. Perhaps a sly and shameless comedy about a family of feckless grifters in the construction trades with a yen for colluding with foreign tyrants seems unappealing now. Maybe wealthy white loons driven by their own absurd character flaws and tragicomically bad parenting just aren’t funny anymore.
Yet Arrested Development‘s telling of the Bluth family saga remained a strong stew of silly, brilliant, and ridiculously baroque storytelling to the end. The show itself recognizes the difficulty of competing with political reality and keeps its narrative set before 2016. But it also toys with that dilemma, inserting occasional dramatic ironies—even beyond the season’s central plot involving a troubled attempt to build a border wall.
The border wall storyline was not, in fact, designed to mock Donald Trump; it began way back in 2013. With Arrested Development, topicality is beside the point. It’s at its best relying on thickly delivered character comedy, crazy misunderstandings, and smart satire. The youngest Bluth’s “inspirational” speech to his fraudulent privacy software company—in which he invites employees to turn the stress-knots they wake up with in their stomachs into “Why-knots?”—deserves to define the digital age as much as any comedy.
from Latest – Reason.com http://bit.ly/2GU5oQG
via IFTTT
Global stocks were higher, with European markets and US equity futures a sea of green on the last day of the week, as China and Japan remained closed for holidays, as world stocks battled to avoid their first weekly fall in six weeks on Friday while investors waited to see if April US jobs data would give the Federal Reserve another reason to dismiss rate cut calls.
While Asian stocks were broadly flat, mostly due to subdued volumes as China and Japan remain closed, and the MSCI Index of Asian stocks closing just 0.02% higher, it appears that Asia once again was instrumental in pushing US futures higher as the Emini rebounded as Hong Kong shares rose 0.4 percent, while Australia gained 0.1%, while Korea’s KOSPI dipped 0.5 percent.
There was more action in Europe, whose bourses were higher across the board as earnings from banks HSBC and Societe Generale cheered traders and encouraging Adidas profits sent the German sportswear firm’s shares surging 7% to a record high.
On Thursday, the S&P dropped on concerns about the US-China trade deal, giving up an initial attempt to regain their record highs and closed in the red, weighed down by energy shares. Oil prices had plunged again after U.S. crude production output set a new record, though the losses were capped by the intensifying political crisis in Venezuela and the stopping of Iranian oil sanction waivers by Washington.
Yet while stocks were broadly higher, bond and commodity markets remained firmly on the backfoot with most benchmark government bond yields up and Brent sliding back toward $70 a barrel again for what will be its worst week in over two months.
Quoted by Reuters, UBP strategist Koon Chow said it all pointed to a little bit of the steam coming out of the markets after a flying start to the year: “For the last four months it has been the unwinding the extreme pessimism that had built up (last year)” he said, referring to trade war nerves and the slowdown in many of the world’s largest economies. “So here we are now in search of the next big thing, and I think today, and for the last few weeks, it is a views and portfolio repositioning exercise.”
Some of the overnight bullishness was attributed to trader expectations for today’s jobs report. The only problem is that nobody knows if it’s better for the report to show bad or good news: since the recent surge in markets has been due to a dovish Fed, any unexpected overheating in job or wage gains, will likely further pressure risk. April payrolls, due at 830am ET, are forecast to show 185,000 net new jobs were added in April and the unemployment rate at a steady 3.8%. Average hourly earnings are expected to rise 3.3%, just shy of the post-crisis highs.
Over in the UK, the latest local council elections results show Labour Party councillors dropped by 53 councillors to 601 and Conservative party councillors dropped by 117 to 512 in England. Instead, voters turned to alternative parties which saw a significant swell in support for the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and independent candidates.
In the currency markets, the dollar strengthened, and the BBDXY rose to session highs ahead of the payrolls report although it may dip soon as an army of Fed doves hits the microphones: there are no less than eight Federal Reserve policymakers due to speak on Friday. The euro stayed lower even as inflation data beat estimates. The pound led G-10 losses but was still set for its biggest weekly gain in almost two months amid optimism a compromise Brexit deal may be struck next week. Australian and New Zealand dollars both fell as speculators wagered both countries could see interest cuts next week. The Aussie slipped below psychological support of $0.7000 overnight to the lowest since early January while the kiwi dollar drifted closer to a recent five-month trough of $0.6581. The weakness in the antipodean currencies also came as the U.S. dollar gained on remarks by U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell earlier this week that a recent weakness in inflation owed to “transitory” factors. That led traders to start paring expectations for a Fed rate cut. Futures now imply about a 49 percent probability of an easing at year-end, down from 61 percent late on Wednesday, according to CME Group’s FedWatch program.
In commodities, West Texas crude steadied, but was in the red in early London trade down 0.3% at $61.65 a barrel, while Brent slipped 0.5 percent to $70.42. Copper fluctuated, still on course for the biggest weekly drop since August. Bitcoin climbed to its highest level since November, advancing toward $6,000.
Other economic releases include wholesale inventories, Markit services PMI. American Tower, Dominion Energy are among companies reporting earnings. There is an avalanche of Fed speakers today including Williams, Bowman, Bullard, Daly, Kaplan and Mester.
Market Snapshot
S&P 500 futures up 0.4% to 2,928.00
STOXX Europe 600 up 0.3% to 390.15
MXAP up 0.02% to 162.61
MXAPJ up 0.02% to 540.03
Nikkei down 0.2% to 22,258.73
Topix down 0.2% to 1,617.93
Hang Seng Index up 0.5% to 30,081.55
Shanghai Composite up 0.5% to 3,078.34
Sensex up 0.4% to 39,153.64
Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.04% to 6,335.80
Kospi down 0.7% to 2,196.32
German 10Y yield rose 1.3 bps to 0.043%
Euro down 0.07% to $1.1164
Brent Futures down 1% to $70.06/bbl
Italian 10Y yield fell 0.3 bps to 2.181%
Spanish 10Y yield rose 0.2 bps to 0.999%
Brent Futures down 1% to $70.06/bbl
Gold spot down 0.05% to $1,270.07
U.S. Dollar Index up 0.06% to 97.89
Top Headline News from Bloomberg
Temporary federal government hiring for the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 count may give nonfarm payrolls a boost starting with the April jobs report due Friday, economists say
A Brexit backlash hit both main parties in U.K. local elections, with smaller parties gaining seats. The news increases hopes that a compromise Brexit deal could be struck next week as both Labour and the Conservatives attempt to bring an end to the divisive issue
ECB’s Weidmann sees signs of pickup in Germany economy, with the current weak phase only “temporary”. Urges the ECB to press ahead with its exit from unconventional monetary policy if inflation allows
ECB’s Rehn also sees evidence of a recovery, but warns not to ‘jump the gun’ on first green shoots
Oil tumbled as much as 4% in New York, lowest levels in a month, as American crude inventories hit highest level in two years and Russia missed targets for production cuts in April
PIMCO Chief U.S. Economist Tiffany Wilding says many on the Fed may favor preemptively cutting rates if they see risks as to the downside, even if a recession is not expected
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker is reported to have said that Bundesbank chief Jens Weidmann is a suitable candidate to take over from Mario Draghi as ECB president
Global Times said in analysis that many observers are wondering if China-U.S. trade talks have hit an impasse as there were few details revealed after the latest meetings on Wednesday
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett told CNBC in an interview that Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has been buying Amazon.com Inc. shares and the purchases will show up in a regulatory filing later this month
Inflation in the euro area accelerated more than expected and a core measure jumped the most in nearly a year, capping a week of encouraging data for the European Central Bank
Donald Trump doesn’t want anyone to see his tax returns. Not the public. Not Congress. But at least one group has peered into the carefully guarded trove and could provide some insight — a team from Deutsche Bank AG
Asian equity markets were mixed with the region cautious ahead of the looming US NFP data and after losses on Wall St where the fallout from the FOMC disappointment persisted and the energy sector underperformed on weaker oil prices. ASX 200 (U/C) swung between gains and losses with notable weakness seen in energy names after WTI crude declined by more than 3% and with financials subdued after Macquarie’s full-year results which improved from the prior year although it flagged a decline for FY20. KOSPI (-0.7%) and Hang Seng (+0.4%%) were negative with South Korea heavily focused on earnings and with risk appetite in Hong Kong sapped by poor GDP data which showed its economy grew at the slowest pace in nearly a decade. However, the Hang Seng is well off intraday lows as trade related news provided a glimmer of optimism with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang to travel to the US on Tuesday and is expected to close the trade deal next week, while US Commerce Secretary Ross suggested they are in the end-game of trade negotiations. As a reminder, mainland China and Japan remained closed for holidays.
Top Asian News
Chip Makers Lead Asia Gains on Hope of Better Earnings, Orders
Foreign Fund Inflows Into Indonesian Bonds Surpass 2018 Level
Major European indices have been gradually grinding higher throughout the session [Euro Stoxx 50 +0.3%], diverging from the cautious trade seen overnight where sentiment was somewhat deterred by the upcoming US jobs report and mixed US-China trade reports. There is no real standout European bourse this morning with gains relatively broad based; although, the SMI (+0.2%) while positive is underperforming its peers, with the index weighed on by Swiss Re (-2.6%) after the Co. posted a miss on Q1 net. In a similar fashion sectors are predominantly in the green with the exception of the Technology sector which is weighed on by heavyweight Sap (-0.4%) in the red following on from reports yesterday that up to 50k companies which are using the Co’s software are at risk of a security breach; the Co. state that guidance on resolving these issues was published in both 2009 and 2013. Other notable movers this morning include banking giant HSBC (+2.4%) who are firmer post-earnings where they beat on both Q1 revenue and pre-tax profit. Separately, but also boosted by earnings are Adidas (+6.1%) with the Co. also topping the Dax (+0.3%) after confirming FY guidance and reporting strong net income & operating figures. Elsewhere, and at the other end of the Stoxx 600 are Intu Properties (-6.4%), after stating that they see FY19 LFL retail income falling by 4-6% and forecast the remainder of the year as being challenging.
Top European News
Norway’s Wealth Fund Surges $84 Billion After Snapping Up Stocks
Merkel Weighs German Carbon Prices to Speed Pollution Cuts
U.K. Economy Seen Stagnating in April as Services Eek Out Growth
Societe Generale Shares Gain on Surprise Strong Capital Beat
In FX, the Greenback remains on a firmer footing ahead of the monthly BLS jobs report, and the index has just notched a new post-FOMC peak at 97.971 amidst expectations that payrolls will post another solid gain, with average earnings forecast to tick up in m/m and y/y terms. The DXY has eclipsed Fib resistance at 97.881 in the process and is now eyeing another retracement level just above 98.000 at 98.059.
CHF/EUR/GBP/JPY/AUD – All weaker, albeit marginally vs the Usd, with the Franc straddling 1.0200 after a further deterioration in Swiss consumer sentiment and in line/steady y/y CPI, but still well shy of the SNB’s 2% target. Meanwhile, the single currency is grinding down further having relinquished the 1.1200 handle on Thursday with Fibs marking out support and resistance at 1.1147 and 1.1186 respectively, and hefty option expiry interest also likely to influence trade/direction ahead of NFP if not the NY cut. Note, firmer than forecast Eurozone inflation has been largely shrugged off given national numbers indicating an upside bias vs consensus. Similarly, Cable failed to glean and positive momentum from confirmation that the UK services sector joined its construction counterpart back into expansion from contraction, with the pair having dipped below the 1.3000 level to circa 1.2990 (just shy of the 100DMA at 1.2983) while Usd/Jpy is pivoting 111.50 and the 30 DMA (111.47) in advance of the aforementioned US labour data and a 111.70 Fib. Last, but by no means least, the Aussie is trying to keep sight of the psychological 0.7000 mark following extended losses to a fractional 2019 low (0.6985) where decent expiry interest (877 mn) resides, but still wary about a potential RBA rate cut next week.
CAD/NZD – Marginal G10 outperformers, or at least holding their own as the Loonie meanders between 1.3458-75 and Kiwi hovers above 0.6600, albeit also conscious that the RBNZ could ease policy at the May meet.
EM – The Lira remains in the spotlight and under pressure in wake of weaker than anticipated Turkish CPI on perceived less hawkish CBRT policy implications, with Usd/Try at the upper end of 5.5800-9595 trading parameters.
In commodities, Brent (-0.5%) and WTI (-0.2%) prices are subdued this morning, as the general uptick in risk appetite this morning has not been able to outweigh the bearish pressure from the stronger dollar. WTI prices are still relatively secure above the USD 61/bbl level, currently trading around the USD 61.40 figure; however, the session lows for Brent did briefly breach the USD 70/bbl level. UBS note that of central concern for oil on the upside are the recent reports that US-China trade talks may have reached an impasse, ahead of next week’s negotiations in Washington. News flow this morning includes sources commenting that Saudi Arabia’s production may increase in June but will still be below the 10.3mln BPD quota under the OPEC+ agreement. For reference, surveys indicate that Saudi Arabia’s output as of April 30th is 9.85mln BPD. Gold (U/C) is relatively lacklustre this morning with the yellow metal torn between the firmer dollar, mixed US-China trade reports and the general improvement in risk sentiment; as such the metal is left pivoting the USD 1270/oz level. Elsewhere, copper is still suffering from the absence of China, although industrial metals in general have strengthened somewhat with some attributing this to recent comments from Tesla, stating that they foresee shortages of minerals which are used in electric vehicles.
US Event Calendar
8:30am: Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 190,000, prior 196,000
Unemployment Rate, est. 3.8%, prior 3.8%
Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.1%
Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 3.3%, prior 3.2%
Underemployment Rate, prior 7.3%
Wholesale Inventories MoM, est. 0.2%, prior 0.2%; Retail Inventories MoM, est. 0.1%, prior 0.3%
9:45am: Markit US Services PMI, est. 52.9, prior 52.9; Markit US Composite PMI, prior 52.8
10am: ISM Non-Manufacturing Index, est. 57, prior 56.1
10:15am: Fed’s Evans Speaks at NABE International Forum in Stockholm
11:30am: Fed’s Clarida Speaks at Hoover Institute Policy Conference
1:45pm: Fed’s Williams Speaks at Hoover Institute Policy Conference
3pm: Fed’s Bowman Speaks at Hoover Institute Policy Conference
7:45pm: Fed’s Bullard, Daly, Kaplan and Mester Speak at Hoover Event
DB’s Craig Nicol concludes the overnight wrap
The last 24 hours was always going to be a little bit of a no man’s land for markets given that it fell in-between the Fed meeting and a payrolls Friday. That said, the Fed-inspired plunge for equities continued, albeit at a much more moderate pace, with the S&P 500 ending -0.21% lower by the time the closing bell rung last night. That was admittedly 0.59% off the intraday lows, with the NASDAQ also bouncing off its low of -0.91% to end the session only -0.16% lower. The DOW fell -0.46%, dragged lower by poor earnings from Dow Chemicals, whose management said they see “discrete” headwinds in the second quarter, and by Caterpillar after investors were unimpressed with its latest dividend announcement.
In Europe we had the PMIs to focus on – more on that below – however equities were playing catch up to the US moves from the day prior with the STOXX 600 ending -0.58%. Cash HY spreads widened by +4bps in Europe but tightened -1bp in the US. It was at least a bit more exciting in the rates market where 2y and 10y Treasury yields rose +4.0bps and +4.1bps respectively, and thus extending Wednesday’s move, while Bunds ended +1.7bps. Those moves were completely driven by real yields, as inflation expectations fell notably. That move was in turn driven by lower oil prices, as investors noted rising US stockpiles unconfirmed reports about increases to Russian and Saudi output. WTI ended -2.81% lower. The USD rose +0.15% which weighed on EM FX once again, as a basket of currencies retreated -0.40%. Oil exporting countries saw bigger falls, led by the Russian Ruble’s -1.24% retreat. In other commodities, Gold and Silver fell -0.48% and -0.32% to fresh year-to-date lows.
So before we can finally take a breather from what has felt like a fairly non-stop week, there’s the small matter of getting through this US employment report in about seven hours’ time. Our US economists expect nonfarm payrolls to slow to 160k versus 196k in March, while the consensus is for 190k. Our colleagues do note though that their forecast should be enough to keep the unemployment rate at 3.8%, while for earnings they forecast +0.2% mom, a tenth below what the market expects. That should still be enough to see the annual rate nudge up to +3.3% yoy though and just shy of its post-recession high.
It’s worth noting that as well as payrolls today we’ve got a number of Fed speakers due up this afternoon. Evans, speaking at 3.15pm BST, should be interesting given that Monday’s inflation data nudged closer to the 1.5% level that Evans said would make him “extremely nervous”. As you’ll see in the day ahead at the end we’ve also got Clarida, Williams, and Bowman speaking at the Hoover Institution Conference this afternoon.
This morning in Asia there isn’t a huge amount to report with markets fairly directionless. Thin trading volumes are still a factor however with Japan and China closed. The Hang Seng (-0.02%) is little changed while the Kospi (-0.69%) has struggled, in contrast to the ASX which is up +0.18%.
In other news, yesterday Stephen Moore withdraw his name from consideration for a Fed governorship, though he gave an interview 2 hours before that decision in which he said he was still “all in.” In China trade talks reportedly concluded positively between the US and China, though subsequent reporting in the Chinese press suggested that officials “may have hit an impasse” which seemed to be the trigger behind the mid-afternoon plunge for equities. The details were less negative than the headline suggested, but the story could nevertheless be a signal from Chinese officials about their willingness to walk away from talks if a satisfactory deal isn’t soon completed.
Meanwhile, the CBO released its latest budget forecasts which turned out to be uneventful. There were no major changes to the forecast for deficits to average -4.3% of GDP over the next 10 years, taking the public debt from its current 78% of GDP level to 92%. Roughly half of that rise is due to the CBO’s projections for higher interest rates, which are above DB’s and consensus forecasts, which suggests the rise will be less severe, but on the other hand the forecasts only include ‘current law’ so there is plenty of scope for things to get worse as tax cuts are renewed and spending caps are lifted moving forward.
Here in the UK it was the turn of the BoE to take the spotlight. As expected there were no policy surprises and the message was fairly neutral at best with growth projections revised up and inflation forecasts down. Our UK economists summarised that the overall communication from the BoE yesterday confirmed that policy remains almost exclusively conditional on a Brexit resolution. And with the ongoing tension between the Bank’s inflation projections and market pricing, Governor Carney reiterated the need for more hikes (than currently priced in) to keep inflation in check. Indeed, Carney’s push back against more dovish pricing at the front end of the UK rate curve was consistent with the MPC’s hawkish bias for gradual and limited tightening over the Bank’s forecast horizon. And given that our colleagues’ base case is for a Brexit resolution in May, they retain their call for an August rate hike. Sterling faded from the highs yesterday to close down -0.14% while the Gilt curve was a touch weaker with 10y yields ending +3.5bps.
As for the details of those PMIs in Europe, the manufacturing reading for the Euro Area was revised up 0.1pts to 47.9. That included better than expected readings for Italy (49.1 vs. 47.8 expected) and Spain (51.8 vs. 51.2 expected) and a +0.4pt upward revision for France to 50.0. The winner? Greece at 56.6 and the highest since 2000. Imagine thinking that four years ago. More significant for Europe, Germany was revised down 0.1pts to 44.4 which puts the increase over March at just +0.3pts. However, the good news was that new orders were up +1.4pts. As our economists noted, the improvement in the southern periphery is welcome and confirms that German contagion is more limited to its cyclical neighbours with falls in the manufacturing PMIs for Switzerland, Sweden, and the Czech Republic, possibly as collateral damage from Germany’s slide. The services readings are due on Monday so that’s the next focal point. Despite some green shoots of optimism then, the reality is that the manufacturing reading for the Euro Area is still the second lowest level in the current cycle and well into contractionary territory.
Over in the US, jobless claims stayed steady at 230k and the final print for March core capital goods orders were revised up +0.2pp to 0% mom. Factory orders rose +1.9% mom, better than the +1.6% expected, and the prior month was revised higher as well. This is likely to present upside risks for the first revision to Q1 US GDP growth later this month. Separately, Q1 productivity rose by +3.6% qoq, the fastest pace since 2014. On a yoy basis, that was the fastest pace since the financial crisis. Our US economists have published research previously showing that productivity tends to lag wage growth, as companies respond to wage pressures by finding new ways to boost output per hour. That underlies DB’s house view for US growth to remain strong over the next several quarters and years, as opposed to the consensus which envisions a gradual slowing.
Finally, the day ahead is unsurprisingly headlined by the April employment report in the US this afternoon, however prior to that we’ll get April CPI data out of Turkey this morning which will be worth a close eye, followed by the April services and composite PMIs in the UK and the April CPI report for the Euro Area. The core reading is expected to rise two-tenths to +1.0% yoy. The other data due in the US today includes the March advance goods trade balance, March wholesale inventories, the April services and composite PMIs and April ISM non-manufacturing. As mentioned earlier the other potentially interesting event to watch is the raft of Fedspeak this afternoon. It starts with Evans who is speaking at an event in Stockholm at 3.15pm BST, before Clarida (4.30pm BST), Williams (6.45pm BST) and Bowman (8pm BST) speak at the Hoover Institute Policy Conference. The Bundesbank’s Weidmann is also due to speak this morning.
via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2PMVJiT Tyler Durden
More cracks are forming in the White House’s carefully-constructed narrative that trade talks could be headed for a resolution next Friday following the 11th round of talks between US and Chinese trade negotiations in Washington. After Beijing floated a report on Thursday suggesting that talks had been an impasse, sending stocks hurtling toward session lows early Thursday afternoon, they have followed up on Friday with a statement casting doubt on Washington’s assertion that a deal is imminent.
According to the South China Morning Post, the Communist Party has published what appears to be a warning to Washington and the investing public. The Communist Party warned in a post on Taoran Notes, a venue for publishing trade-talk updates for the Chinese public, that reports about a deal being reached next Friday were part of a pressure campaign to get Beijing to acquiesce to a deal, adding that this “smoke and mirrors” ploy wouldn’t work.
“Taoran Notes, a social media account used by Beijing to release trade talk information and to manage domestic expectations, said the hints from the US side that next week’s 11th round of talks are a deadline is merely a trick “to increase tensions and generate pressure on the other side.”
“It’s the same tactic as the US threatening to raise tariffs, it is merely smoke and mirrors to exert extreme pressure [on China],” the post said. “You don’t have to take it seriously.”
Of even greater concern for stock market bulls: Beijing warned that “an unhappy departure” is still possible if the US fails to compromise.
It warned that there is still a possibility that the two sides will end up in “an unhappy departure” if one side wants the other to make compromises and neglects “fairness in negotiation.”
Exact details of the talks are shrouded in secrecy, although Beijing and Washington have hailed “progress” after every round of talks over the last five months, with Mnuchin calling this week’s talks in Beijing “productive.”
Which is surprising because over the past week, media reports have suggested that the US has done nothing but compromise. Not only have Mnuchin, Lighthizer & Co. reportedly backed down on US demands for a stable enforcement mechanism and – even more embarrassingly – demands that China promise to end its cyberespionage campaign, and the US Chamber of Commerce said Thursday that a final deal could fall short on addressing state industrial subsidies – another one of the Trump Administration’s key demands.
During a speech at the BRI Forum last week, President Xi spoke about promises to increase agricultural purchases, increase market access for foreign companies and prohibit forced technology transfers. Though Xi didn’t explicitly mention talks with the US, it’s looking increasingly likely that these concessions represent a ‘final offer’ from Beijing.
Whether the White House decides to take it, or leave it, next week could decide whether a deal is reached, or China walks away.
via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2IZc6IK Tyler Durden
Thanks to all the Porridge Readers who have forwarded me the Bank of England Job, suggesting I apply. Not for me…
A few years ago I used to think I was being hilariously witty when I wrote about the Global Financial Crisis 2007-2027.
I fear I might not have joking! It doesn’t necessarily mean we’re in for 8 more years of austerity, doom and gloom. Fortunes will continue be won and lost. Markets will go up and down. There will be plenty more to write about in terms of extraordinary corporate madness – like Tesla’s new convertible issue (Please!) – and credulous markets. I’m not convinced there will be the global financial reset many fear.
But there are going to be long-term tectonic finance shifts. The next few years will likely see a complete turnaround in the basics of current markets. Be prepared. I suspect we’ve hit peak greed. There will be significant political shifts and reinvention – populism won’t last long. I also expect a massive change in the role of central banks, and their inter-reaction with governments, to drive clearer economic goals and objectives. The age of inflation targeting is over – we are going to undergo profound change after the scale of the last 10-years mistakes becomes apparent. It’s going to be bad news for some, but great for others.
I suspect Green/environmental themes will also come to the fore as the scale of what we’ve done to ourselves becomes apparent – and our kids will thank us for finally waking up to our responsibilities. (Perhaps the Climate Change Deniers should remember that capitalism is about taking responsibility!) As soon as I finish the Morning Porridge, I’ll be due dilligencing a carbon sequestration deal that looks very interesting and an industry of the future!
There are a whole series of things the week that have triggered this morning’s Friday rant:
Billionaire Ray Dalio’s comments on the inevitability of Modern Monetary Theory, and his acceptance of the need for taxing the rich, is one aspect of the new financial reality. The imperative for change in the actions of central banks as they are stuck in zero rates is one thing. The fact his thoughts are echoed my many other leading economists, but also by the rising star of politics, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is fascinating.
I was stuck by the Sob-Story of a Chinese mother who blubbed she thought the $6mm she paid a corrupt sports coach was sponsorship to get her daughter into Stanford University. The video her daughter made was much more revealing – justifying her privileged admission to her “followers” on the basis of hard work she never did.
Or how about the billionaire boss of US pharma firm INSYS, John Kapoor, going to jail for bribing doctors to overprescribe opioids – now one of the largest killers in the US. What shocks me is the numbers of doctors happy to take $150k per year from Insys not blinking as they were killing their patients!
This week in LA was the “Predators Ball” in Los Angeles – the Milken Institute’s annual gab-fest of the great and greedy of the markets. It’s been described as yet another gathering of “Billionaires telling Millionaires what the ordinary people think”. The theme of the conference was “Driving Shared Prosperity”. (WTF does that mean?) Some of the participant quotes are shocking – but at least the Billionaire message was very simple: Capitalism is Good, Venezuela and Russia prove that Socialism is very bad – taxing billionaires is Socialist and therefore very bad. The conference came complete with a sound garden and a puppy petting park – because petting puppies “reduces blood pressure, promotes focused inter-reactions, and stimulates problem solving.” BARF.
And then there was a discussion I had with a client this week. He’s a very successful fund manager who has been doing well. He was enthused, interested, and keen to explore new investment ideas. Over coffees we got onto talking about his young family, the fact he doesn’t see enough of them, the misery of his 1 hour each way commute, and his feeling of constant struggle – his earnings seem to just cover the mortgage, fees, schools, the cars and all the other sundries of modern life. He is time poor and feels financially stretched. He’s certainly in the top 0.2% of UK earners, but feels he’s just making do.
Most of us will know exactly how he feels. He is not alone. Apparently, you need a £250k income to survive in London these days. San Francisco is even more expensive.
What is in store for our kids? Even after we poured money into their education and they’ve found “good” jobs, they struggle to pay rent on grotty flats (with little expectation of buying their own), and are lumbered with student debt. What have they got to look forward to? 30/40 years of clinging on before retiring on miserable pensions they’ve struggled to save in the heartless gig economy? And these are the better off kids..
Its no wonder there is so much talk about social revolution across markets today. We need to make things better. We are confronted with political failure across the occidental economies – the UK paralysed by Brexit, Europe in sway to populism, and the US – enough said. Many of my market colleagues agree with my analysis we face a summer of increasing protest and struggle. History tells us that times of such social imbalance and political impotence spawn the most dangerous event risks.
Let’s go back to the Predators’ Ball in LA. Conference founder Mike Milken is now a philanthropic legend supporting medical causes. Those of us of a certain age remember him as the king of the junk bonds who was sent down to sew mailbags for Uncle Sam after his shady dealings at Drexel Burnham Lambert were exposed in the 1980s. He remains insanely wealthy. (Some say he was the model for Gorden Gecko – check it yourself…)
Apparently, the conference highlight this year was a 1977 video of Margaret Thatcher telling every one “Capitalism has a moral basis… to be free, you have to be capitalist.”
Thatcher made a good point in 1977 as she prescribed her drastic cure for a very sick and troubled UK in the iron grip of the unions, spiralling from daily power cuts towards the dire Winter of Discontent, before her election victory in 1979. But, I am sure Thatcher would be shocked by Capitalism today. Capitalism is justifiably under attack because of its excesses. Let’s not think it’s a battle between humanity and few billionaires – but what the 0.01% elites have come to represent looks crass, shoddy and vulgar. They are a tiny minority.
The issues should not be about social revolution against the insanely wealthy – but making everyone better. (If they were smart, the wealthy would agree.) At the core of the crisis is income inequality and a populist leftward-shift fuelled by the growing and very visible divide between the haves and the have nots. Firebrands like Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have seized the imagination. She is clearly scaring the billionaire class – because they are doing their utmost to dismiss her as a blundering momentary fad. But, she and the rest of the Social Democrats – or Socialists as the right wing are demonising them – are getting airtime, and hitting the pulse of the stretched middle who are nervous on their futures, their families, healthcare, education, taxes and jobs.
At heart, Democrats in the US, and most Labour voters here in the UK, remain Capitalists at heart – taking responsibility for themselves and striving for better. Voting from AOC or for Jeremy Corbyn does not mean Moscow wins and we all start singing the Red Flag. (Disclosure: I am Scottish, that makes me genetically a socialist, but the politician I most admire is probably Thatcher, even though we were chanting: “Maggie Thatcher, Milk Snatcher” on the first Demo I went on!)
When I was at university I was a socialist. Then I joined the city, I reaped the benefits of capitalism and embraced it. But, Its difficult to support Billionaire capitalism when ostentatious wealth is flouted in our faces, our monied “betters” won’t embrace society, and the weak and struggling of society are treated with contempt. (I suppose I had some kind of Road to Damascus moment when I wrote about the shocking poverty, homelessness and drug abuse in San Francisco earlier this year.)
The new Democratic/Socialist agenda is not that shocking – it boils down to upskilling, an educational rebuild, reaffirming opportunities for all, and providing training to create a workforce prepped to succeed in the new modern/robotic environment, and able to be more productive in a competitive/disruptive global marketplace. It aims to create future security by investing across infrastructure to future proof the economy. It aims to cover and provide strong and stable healthcare for all. These are all common goods to benefit the whole of society.
What’s not to like?
The horror is because the Democrats propose taxing the rich to pay for it. The sheer effrontery! They don’t believe in trickle down. They don’t believe rich entrepreneurs create jobs and pay more to their workers. They dare to suggest their social betters pay minimum wages to their workers and pay themselves obscene amounts!
They do that because its true…
Ray Dalio – the hedge fund manager who paid himself $2 bln in 2018 – has noted the change in the wind. Despite that $2 bln paycheck he admits capitalism is flawed and needs reform. He accepts he will pay greater taxes.
Moreover the predicts an enormous shift in policy responses –Monetary Policy 3 and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) as inevitable consequences of failed monetary experimentation these past few years. These are dangerous concepts – governments spending money is always open to abuse. Issues from simply writing off the vast amounts of public debt held by central banks to generating public consumption through directly paying consumers to consume could be on the table. You can read Dalio here.
There are going to be fascinating times ahead! Right… where is that pitch on Carbon Sequestration….
via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2GRPk1N Tyler Durden
Get ready to pop the cork on a bottle of champagne. As the American Prospectreported earlier this month, California—where a highest-in-the-nation one in five people is poor, according to the Census Bureau’s cost-of-living-based standard—might be on the verge of doing “something that’s never before happened in the United States: eliminate childhood deep poverty.”
The Legislature simply needs to pass a variety of multibillion-dollar proposals—expanding Medi-Cal, funding universal preschool, investing “major sums” in affordable housing—that Gov. Gavin Newsom has included in his first budget. Obviously, my tongue is firmly planted in cheek—even if Democratic lawmakers and liberal magazine writers might not understand why many of us are guffawing.
California has the nation’s most-generous social-welfare programs. It is the most progressive state in America politically and has been for years. There are few achievable left-of-center policies that haven’t been tried here, yet poverty is more intractable than ever. Perhaps poverty is so high because of such policies, which always hike taxes, expand programs and regulate the heck out of the private sector.
State lawmakers are consumed by the idea of battling poverty. Local governments are fixated on the problem as well. One of California’s poorest bigger cities, Stockton, is implementing a privately funded pilot program to give poor residents a Universal Basic Income—monthly cash that recipients can use with no strings attached—and has been enjoying favorable media attention as the program rolls out.
But one state labor official explained why the Stockton giveaway is a bad idea. His words offer a hint at why nothing the state tries ever reduces poverty. “This concept of universal basic income is a surrender to a kind of grim Dickensian view of the future, frankly, in which people are robbed of the dignity of work,” said Barry Broad, who heads the California Employment Training Panel. The money phrase: “dignity of work.”
For all their blather about the poor, California officials have refused to pick the low-hanging fruit—simple, easy to reach measures that would make it easier for low-income Californians to pursue dignified and lucrative careers. California imposes onerous occupational-licensing rules. If you want to do anything beyond, say, working in a fast-food job, you’ve got to get permission from the state.
The average cost of a license is $500, which isn’t insurmountable. But paying Caesar is the easy part. The myriad training rules are the main problem. Last year, Sen. Mike Morrell (R–Rancho Cucamonga) introduced a bill (which my employer sponsored) to eliminate the 1,500 hours in schooling required to shampoo and curl people’s hair for pay. It costs thousands of dollars to get a barbering and cosmetology degree.
That modest bill died in the Assembly. The committee punted the issue to the so-called Sunset Review. While that panel annually reviews many state regulations, it rarely sunsets anything. The ugly truth is the preponderance of licensing rules and training requirements have nothing to do with promoting the public’s safety—and everything to do with protecting existing industries from competition.
Lawmakers don’t like to take on existing interest groups and most are aghast at the idea of rolling back government regulations. That’s why other bills to reduce or eliminate these burdensome rules have been non-starters. Yet what better way to reduce poverty than to make it easier for people to pursue useful trades? This dysfunctional system reminds me of the dystopian 1985 movie, “Brazil.” The outlaw (Harry Tuttle, played by Robert De Niro) fixes heating and air-conditioning systems without a license. Says Tuttle: “Listen, this old system of yours could be on fire and I couldn’t even turn on the kitchen tap without filling out a 27b/6. Bloody paperwork.”
Meanwhile, conservative-leaning Arizona is reforming such laws. Republican Gov. Doug Ducey this month signed a measure that recognizes new residents’ licenses from other states. “There’s dignity in all work,” the governor said. (There’s that phrase again.) “And we know that whether you make your living as a plumber, a barber, a nurse or anything else, you don’t lose your skills simply because you moved here.” There’s little chance California would approve such a reform.
California has tried to deal with the licensing issue, albeit in a perverse way. Attorney General Xavier Becerra last year sponsored Senate Bill 1272 to help law-enforcement arrest people who buy or sell services in the “underground economy.” Fortunately, Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed it. The state also announced sting operations to catch laborers who have exceeded the measly $500 cap on providing unlicensed contracting. Instead of reforming its rules, California officials hope to fine and jail people.
Backers claimed that such work results in “significant uncollected revenues,” in case you were unsure of the motivation. Those revenues are needed to fund anti-poverty programs, but perhaps someday lawmakers might realize that the best way to eliminate poverty is to make it easier for people to legally pursue dignified work.
This column was first published in the Orange County Register.
Steven Greenhut is Western region director for the R Street Institute. He was a Register editorial writer from 1998-2009. Write to him at sgreenhut@rstreet.org.
from Latest – Reason.com http://bit.ly/2IYSy78
via IFTTT
Though it hasn’t made much of a difference in the share price, the Wall Street Journal has been publishing one groundbreaking (and, for Boeing, deeply embarrassing) scoop after another about how the aerospace company either mislead its largest customer and the FAA about disabling critical safety alerts on the 737 MAX 8, or simply wasn’t aware that the alerts had been disabled (it’s not entirely clear which is the case).
And on Friday, with Boeing shares still inexplicably up double-digits on the year despite new orders having ground to a halt and the grounding of the 737 MAX having no end in sight, WSJ published its latest bombshell about Boeing’s mishandling of the MCAS rollout, reporting that Boeing had limited the role of test pilots in the final stages of development. These pilots also lacked key details about the system and, importantly, the alerts that would signal to pilots when MCAS was malfunctioning.
This is extremely puzzling, because as has previously been reported, MCAS marked an unprecedented level of automation in the new generation of the 737. One would think Boeing would want to get as much human input as possible to stress test the system, especially since the new Boeing jets would rely on a single sensor to feed into the system.
For what it’s worth, Boeing has denied the report. However, given WSJ‘s track record on Boeing-related scoops, it appears likely that this revelation will lead to increased scrutiny of Boeing from the FAA as the aerospace company tries to win approval for its updated MCAS software from the FAA.
As a result, Boeing test pilots and senior pilots involved in the MAX’s development didn’t receive detailed briefings about how fast or steeply the automated system known as MCAS could push down a plane’s nose, these people said. Nor were they informed that the system relied on a single sensor—rather than two—to verify the accuracy of incoming data about the angle of a plane’s nose, they added.
Investigators have linked faulty sensor data to the flight-control system’s misfire, which led to crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia that took 346 lives.
The extent of pilots’ lack of involvement hasn’t been previously reported and could bring fresh scrutiny from investigators and regulators already looking into Boeing’s design and engineering practices. It isn’t clear whether greater pilot participation would have altered the ultimate design of the flight-control system. But the scaling back of pilots’ involvement and their lack of detailed knowledge about the plane’s system add to the list of questions about engineering and design practices facing the Chicago-based aerospace giant.
A Boeing spokesman said test pilots and senior pilots didn’t have less of a role in the design, briefing and testing of the final version of MCAS when compared with their counterparts who worked on previous models featuring important new systems.
“Listening to pilots is an important aspect of our work,” the spokesman said. “Their experienced input is front and center in our mind when we develop airplanes. We share a common priority – safety – and we listen to them carefully.”
Though WSJ caveats its story by writing that it’s unclear whether the pilots’ input would have made a difference in its ultimate design, we imagine their involvement might have tipped off Boeing to the difficulties pilots faced in bringing a mis-firing MCAS under control. Remember, the team investigating the Ethiopian Airlines crash revealed that MCAS fired four times before it ultimately doomed all 157 people aboard the flight. Maybe, if the test pilots had experienced something similar and been able to warn Boeing about this defect, nearly 350 people – the total number aboard ET302 and the Lion Air flight that crashed just minutes after takeoff back in October – wouldn’t have had to die.
via ZeroHedge News http://bit.ly/2IXy1A5 Tyler Durden
Get ready to pop the cork on a bottle of champagne. As the American Prospectreported earlier this month, California—where a highest-in-the-nation one in five people is poor, according to the Census Bureau’s cost-of-living-based standard—might be on the verge of doing “something that’s never before happened in the United States: eliminate childhood deep poverty.”
The Legislature simply needs to pass a variety of multibillion-dollar proposals—expanding Medi-Cal, funding universal preschool, investing “major sums” in affordable housing—that Gov. Gavin Newsom has included in his first budget. Obviously, my tongue is firmly planted in cheek—even if Democratic lawmakers and liberal magazine writers might not understand why many of us are guffawing.
California has the nation’s most-generous social-welfare programs. It is the most progressive state in America politically and has been for years. There are few achievable left-of-center policies that haven’t been tried here, yet poverty is more intractable than ever. Perhaps poverty is so high because of such policies, which always hike taxes, expand programs and regulate the heck out of the private sector.
State lawmakers are consumed by the idea of battling poverty. Local governments are fixated on the problem as well. One of California’s poorest bigger cities, Stockton, is implementing a privately funded pilot program to give poor residents a Universal Basic Income—monthly cash that recipients can use with no strings attached—and has been enjoying favorable media attention as the program rolls out.
But one state labor official explained why the Stockton giveaway is a bad idea. His words offer a hint at why nothing the state tries ever reduces poverty. “This concept of universal basic income is a surrender to a kind of grim Dickensian view of the future, frankly, in which people are robbed of the dignity of work,” said Barry Broad, who heads the California Employment Training Panel. The money phrase: “dignity of work.”
For all their blather about the poor, California officials have refused to pick the low-hanging fruit—simple, easy to reach measures that would make it easier for low-income Californians to pursue dignified and lucrative careers. California imposes onerous occupational-licensing rules. If you want to do anything beyond, say, working in a fast-food job, you’ve got to get permission from the state.
The average cost of a license is $500, which isn’t insurmountable. But paying Caesar is the easy part. The myriad training rules are the main problem. Last year, Sen. Mike Morrell (R–Rancho Cucamonga) introduced a bill (which my employer sponsored) to eliminate the 1,500 hours in schooling required to shampoo and curl people’s hair for pay. It costs thousands of dollars to get a barbering and cosmetology degree.
That modest bill died in the Assembly. The committee punted the issue to the so-called Sunset Review. While that panel annually reviews many state regulations, it rarely sunsets anything. The ugly truth is the preponderance of licensing rules and training requirements have nothing to do with promoting the public’s safety—and everything to do with protecting existing industries from competition.
Lawmakers don’t like to take on existing interest groups and most are aghast at the idea of rolling back government regulations. That’s why other bills to reduce or eliminate these burdensome rules have been non-starters. Yet what better way to reduce poverty than to make it easier for people to pursue useful trades? This dysfunctional system reminds me of the dystopian 1985 movie, “Brazil.” The outlaw (Harry Tuttle, played by Robert De Niro) fixes heating and air-conditioning systems without a license. Says Tuttle: “Listen, this old system of yours could be on fire and I couldn’t even turn on the kitchen tap without filling out a 27b/6. Bloody paperwork.”
Meanwhile, conservative-leaning Arizona is reforming such laws. Republican Gov. Doug Ducey this month signed a measure that recognizes new residents’ licenses from other states. “There’s dignity in all work,” the governor said. (There’s that phrase again.) “And we know that whether you make your living as a plumber, a barber, a nurse or anything else, you don’t lose your skills simply because you moved here.” There’s little chance California would approve such a reform.
California has tried to deal with the licensing issue, albeit in a perverse way. Attorney General Xavier Becerra last year sponsored Senate Bill 1272 to help law-enforcement arrest people who buy or sell services in the “underground economy.” Fortunately, Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed it. The state also announced sting operations to catch laborers who have exceeded the measly $500 cap on providing unlicensed contracting. Instead of reforming its rules, California officials hope to fine and jail people.
Backers claimed that such work results in “significant uncollected revenues,” in case you were unsure of the motivation. Those revenues are needed to fund anti-poverty programs, but perhaps someday lawmakers might realize that the best way to eliminate poverty is to make it easier for people to legally pursue dignified work.
This column was first published in the Orange County Register.
Steven Greenhut is Western region director for the R Street Institute. He was a Register editorial writer from 1998-2009. Write to him at sgreenhut@rstreet.org.
from Latest – Reason.com http://bit.ly/2IYSy78
via IFTTT
Maybe you’ve never thought of umbrellas as deadly weapons. I never did. But take a look at the ones in the new Zhang Yimou movie Shadow, in which the usual rib-and-cloth umbrella assembly has been replaced with a canopy of long razory knives. At first I thought Zhang had to be making these babies up; but the internet tells me he wasn’t, exactly. Kung-fu umbrella actually is a martial-arts thing, apparently, although the blades we see in the movie, which can be detached with the whip of an arm and sent flying toward an opponent, would appear to be a Zhangian embellishment—needless to say, a very cool one.
After being schooled in this matter, I decided to just accept some of the other retro-futuristic tech on display here—the arm-strapped crossbow gloves, the reed-based scuba gear. Why not? The movie is beautiful beyond the call of the wuxia action genre, and since the story at the heart of it unfolds at a pace that is, shall we say, deliberate, we’ll take all the fantasy pep we can get.
The time is Long Ago. In the court of the Kingdom of Pei we meet a young monarch (Zheng Kai); his pretty sister (Guan Xiaotong); his handsome military commander, Yu (Deng Chao); and Yu’s elegant wife (Sun Li). What we don’t know, at first, is that Yu is a ringer—a body double, or “shadow,” named Jing—who has been brought in by the real Yu (also played by Deng Chao) to take his place and thus conceal from the kingdom’s enemies that its top general has been grievously wounded in battle. The real-deal Yu is hunkered down in a sort of cavern deep inside the royal palace, where a breeze-from-nowhere blows interestingly through his disheveled hair and he makes himself available to his wife and to the imposter Yu for fight training and military consultations. His martial expertise is especially important now that it’s been decided something must be done about an enemy general named Yang (Hu Jun), who has occupied a nearby city, also called Jing, that the Kingdom of Pei has always liked to think of as its own.
What we have here is a kung-fu war story, a love story (more than one, actually), and a spy story, too (there’s a mole in the royal court). As you’d expect from the director who once gave us such game-changing wuxia movies as Hero and House of Flying Daggers, Zhang also provides more fabulous imagery than can probably be taken in on just one viewing. He says he was inspired by the ancient Chinese art of ink-wash painting, and in pursuit of that watery esthetic, after shooting the movie in color, he proceeded to drain most of the color away, leaving behind only skin tones and gashes of red to punctuate the widescreen grayscale.
This is a formidable technical achievement, for which much credit must surely go to Zhang’s customary cinematographer, Zhao Xiaoding, and to his production and costume designers (Ma Kwong Wing and Chen Minzheng, respectively). The blossom-printed rice-paper screens and ornately detailed armor would justify more leisurely appreciation; and some of the exterior textures—a bamboo forest, underwater harbor fortifications and rain that never stops pouring down—create a steely mood of the sort familiar from old Bible lithographs.
The action in this movie is not what you’d call nonstop. There’s quite a bit of exposition at the beginning, and when the picture does kick into gear, there’s not a lot of old-school wire fu to be seen (although what we do see of it is subtly executed). This is fine. Zhang stages some terrifically complex battle scenes featuring crowds of warriors all wielding blade umbrellas or sliding down wet village streets picking off locals with their miniature crossbows. The man’s an action visionary.
He is also a man dedicated to finding higher purposes for female characters and actors. (This is the director who gave Gong Li and Zhang Ziyi their first film roles.) Here, he has not only created a gratifying vengeance arc for Guan Xiaotong’s angry princess (who holds a serious grudge against a clueless prince who tried to purchase her for a concubine), but has also given her one of the great zither-duet scenes (okay, sounds weird—you have to see it). Sun Li’s conflicted wife, increasingly torn between two versions of her husband, is a more passive figure—more hemmed-in by tradition. But it’s her unique style of fighting (the umbrella school, I guess it could be called), that wins the day at the end. Well, more or less—the story, too, is told in shades of gray.
from Latest – Reason.com http://bit.ly/2JdnNKY
via IFTTT