Death Of Denial – Part II

Death Of Denial – Part II

By Russell Clark of Capital Flows and Asset Markets, part II of a three-part series. (Part 1 here)

My investing career started in the 1990s, and after seeing the Asian Financial Crisis, the dot-com bust, the GFC, the Euro-crisis, and various emerging market crises, I paid very careful attention to capital flows and asset markets (hence the title of this substack). Since 2016, I have felt markets have changed. And I have tried to understand this change, so I could judge how much risk I was taking. I came up with two reasons for why markets were trading so differently. The first reason was the prolonged period of commodity deflation had allowed central banks to do whatever they wanted. The second was that moving from banks pricing market risk to clearinghouses pricing risk had profoundly changed markets. Both seemed to be good reasons to me, but the Russian invasion of Ukraine were ideal circumstances to test these theories. If correct, they should have led to severe weakness in equities. That did not happen so we need to look elsewhere.

Long time readers will know I believe that Japan occupies a special role in the financial world. Uniquely among all nations, the Japanese government, households and corporates are all net lenders to the world. What is far more typical is for most countries to have only one or none of the sectors being a lender to the world. So as the previous post showed, the US private and public sector are net borrowers from the world.

In contrast, Japan has run a very large surplus NIIP in both private and public NIIP. And these flows have accelerated as its bubble economy deflated during the 1990s and 2000s. So this would argue that Japan is the main provider of capital globally.

I had assumed that a spike in food price would cause financial distress, as the move higher in 1996, 2007 and 2011 had preceded the Asian Financial Crisis, the GFC and the Eurocrisis respectively.

The big difference between now and the previous spikes in commodity prices is that BOJ was trying to normalize interest rates to some degree. So in 1997, 3 month TIBOR rates touched 1% up form 0.6%, before the Asian Financial Crisis. The BOJ also kept 3m TIBOR rates above 0% until 2016, when markets have become more distorted in my view. One nice feature of this analysis is that BOJ also tried to raise interest rates in 2000, when the Dot Com bust occurred but was a period of falling commodity prices.

Finally, the weakness of Asian currencies can be explained away by looking at the performance of Asian currencies in Yen terms. “Risk off” can be seen when ADXY is falling, such as in 1998, 2002, 2008 and 2016. Recent moves of ADXY in Yen terms are clearly “risk on”.

Moving from looking at the Federal Reserve policy as driving markets, which is increasingly hawkish, to the BOJ, which remains resolutely dovish, clears up much of the mystery of recent market moves in my view. The big question is when does the BOJ get hawkish?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 20:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/jhJauMv Tyler Durden

Maritime cybersecurity: All at sea

Spurred by a Cyberspace Solarium op-ed, Nate Jones gives an overview of cybersecurity worries in the maritime sector, where there is certainly plenty to worry about. I critique the U.S. government’s December 2020 National Maritime Cybersecurity Strategy, a 36-page tome that, once the intro and summary and appendices and blank pages are subtracted, boils down to eight pages of substance. Luckily, the Atlantic Council has filled the void with its own report on the topic.

Of course, the maritime sector isn’t the only one we should be concerned about. Sultan Meghji points to the deeply troubling state of industrial control security, as illustrated by a “10 out of 10” vulnerability recently identified in a Rockwell Automation ICS system.

Still, sometimes software rot serves a good purpose. Maury Shenk tells us about decay in Russia’s SORM – a site-blocking system that may be buckling under the weight of the Ukraine invasion. Talking about SORM allows me to trash a nothingburger story perpetrated by three New York Times reporters who ought to know better. Adam Satariano, Paul Mozur and Aaron Krolik should be ashamed of themselves for writing a long story suggesting that Nokia did something wrong by selling Russia telecom gear that enables wiretaps. Since the same wiretap features are required by Western governments as a matter of law, Nokia could hardly do anything else. SORM and its abuses were all carried out by Russian companies. I suspect that, after wading through a boatload of leaked documents, these three (three!) reporters just couldn’t admit there was no there there.

Nate and I note the emergence of a new set of secondary sanctions targets as Treasury begins listing companies that it sees as part of a sanctions evasion network. We also puzzle over the surprising pushback on proposals to impose  sanctions on Kaspersky, If the WSJ is correct, and the reason is fear of cyberattacks if the Russian firm is sanctioned, isn’t that reason enough to sanction them out of Western networks?

Sultan and Maury remind us that regulating cryptocurrency is wildly popular with some, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren and the EU Parliament. Sultan remains skeptical that sweeping regulation is in the cards. He is much more bullish on Apple’s ability to upend the entire fintech field by plunging into financial services with enthusiasm. I point out that it’s almost impossible for a financial services company to maintain a standoffish relationship with government, so Apple may have to change the tune it’s been playing in the U.S. for the last decade.

Nate and I plumb some of the complexities of a story Brian Krebs broke about hackers exploiting the system by which online services provide subscriber information to law enforcement in an emergency.

Speaking of Krebs, we dig into Ubiquiti’s defamation suit against him. The gist of the complaint is that Krebs relied on a “whistleblower” who turned out to be the perp, and that Krebs didn’t quickly correct his scoop when that became apparent. My sympathies are with Krebs on this one, at least until Ubiquiti fills in a serious gap in its complaint – the lack of any allegation that the company told Krebs that he’d been misled and asked for a retraction. Without that, it’s hard to say that Krebs was negligent (let alone malicious) in reporting allegations by an apparently well-informed insider.

As the episode draws to a close, Maury brings us up to speed on the (still half-formed) U.K. online harms bill and explains why the U.K. government was willing to let the subsidiary of a Chinese company buy the U.K.’s biggest chip foundry. Sultan finds several insights in an excellent CNN story about the Great Conti Leak.

And, finally, I express my qualms about the indictment (for disclosing classified information) of Mark Unkenholz, a highly competent NSA lifer whom I knew while in government. To my mind the prosecutors are going to have to establish that Unkenholz did something very different from the kind of disclosures that were a standard part of his job. You can’t do the kind of commercial outreach he did without encountering tech companies that have no security clearances but plenty of capabilities valued by the intelligence community. You either give the companies’ uncleared execs enough classified information to understand what you need or you get no help. In that milieu, it simply isn’t enough for prosecutors to say, “He gave classified information to someone without a clearance; he should be in jail.”

Download the 401 Episode (mp3)

You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed.

Also, we’re in the market.  We will have a part-time opening for someone who’d like to do cyberlaw substantive work as well as sound editing and production on the podcast.  If you’re interested, send a cv to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com.

The post Maritime cybersecurity: All at sea appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/CPt2Nic
via IFTTT

“It’s Time For Me To Go” – Hong Kong Leader Carrie Lam Won’t Seek Another Term

“It’s Time For Me To Go” – Hong Kong Leader Carrie Lam Won’t Seek Another Term

After presiding over one of the most tumultuous periods in Hong Kong’s modern history – during which Beijing reasserted its control over the city following a massive pro-democracy protest movement (in defiance of international law) before its COVID mortality rate skyrocketed to one of the highest in the world – Hong Kong President Carrie Lam announced Monday that she would not be seeking re-election following her five-year tenure at the city’s helm.

According to the SCMP, Lam – derided by detractors as the “piglet” to President Xi’s “Winnie the Pooh” – cited family reasons for her reason to step down as she announced her decision during her daily press conference on Monday.

“They think it is time for me to go home,” she said. “Family is the most important part of me.”

She thanked her loved ones, her team, her Executive Council, lawmakers and the central government for their support during her tenure…

“I will complete my five-year term as chief executive on June 30, and officially conclude my 42-year career in government,” Lam told reporters at the 11am conference, usually meant for updates on the city’s pandemic management.

…while insisting that her decision to step down had “nothing” to do with her performance on the job.

“It’s not a question of evaluating my performance or the performance of the Hong Kong government in this term,” she added. “This is a question of my personal wish and aspirations. My personal wish and aspirations are entirely based on my family’s consideration.”

Lam’s retirement has been a long time coming. It has been reported that she had informed Beijing of her wish to step down as far back as a year ago, during March of 2021, before that year’s annual session of the National People’s Congress. Unfortunately for her, she was apparently ordered to hold off until now.

Monday’s announcement left No 2 government official Chief Secretary John Lee Ka-chiu has the clear front-runner.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 20:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/TbHSV2s Tyler Durden

Maritime cybersecurity: All at sea

Spurred by a Cyberspace Solarium op-ed, Nate Jones gives an overview of cybersecurity worries in the maritime sector, where there is certainly plenty to worry about. I critique the U.S. government’s December 2020 National Maritime Cybersecurity Strategy, a 36-page tome that, once the intro and summary and appendices and blank pages are subtracted, boils down to eight pages of substance. Luckily, the Atlantic Council has filled the void with its own report on the topic.

Of course, the maritime sector isn’t the only one we should be concerned about. Sultan Meghji points to the deeply troubling state of industrial control security, as illustrated by a “10 out of 10” vulnerability recently identified in a Rockwell Automation ICS system.

Still, sometimes software rot serves a good purpose. Maury Shenk tells us about decay in Russia’s SORM – a site-blocking system that may be buckling under the weight of the Ukraine invasion. Talking about SORM allows me to trash a nothingburger story perpetrated by three New York Times reporters who ought to know better. Adam Satariano, Paul Mozur and Aaron Krolik should be ashamed of themselves for writing a long story suggesting that Nokia did something wrong by selling Russia telecom gear that enables wiretaps. Since the same wiretap features are required by Western governments as a matter of law, Nokia could hardly do anything else. SORM and its abuses were all carried out by Russian companies. I suspect that, after wading through a boatload of leaked documents, these three (three!) reporters just couldn’t admit there was no there there.

Nate and I note the emergence of a new set of secondary sanctions targets as Treasury begins listing companies that it sees as part of a sanctions evasion network. We also puzzle over the surprising pushback on proposals to impose  sanctions on Kaspersky, If the WSJ is correct, and the reason is fear of cyberattacks if the Russian firm is sanctioned, isn’t that reason enough to sanction them out of Western networks?

Sultan and Maury remind us that regulating cryptocurrency is wildly popular with some, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren and the EU Parliament. Sultan remains skeptical that sweeping regulation is in the cards. He is much more bullish on Apple’s ability to upend the entire fintech field by plunging into financial services with enthusiasm. I point out that it’s almost impossible for a financial services company to maintain a standoffish relationship with government, so Apple may have to change the tune it’s been playing in the U.S. for the last decade.

Nate and I plumb some of the complexities of a story Brian Krebs broke about hackers exploiting the system by which online services provide subscriber information to law enforcement in an emergency.

Speaking of Krebs, we dig into Ubiquiti’s defamation suit against him. The gist of the complaint is that Krebs relied on a “whistleblower” who turned out to be the perp, and that Krebs didn’t quickly correct his scoop when that became apparent. My sympathies are with Krebs on this one, at least until Ubiquiti fills in a serious gap in its complaint – the lack of any allegation that the company told Krebs that he’d been misled and asked for a retraction. Without that, it’s hard to say that Krebs was negligent (let alone malicious) in reporting allegations by an apparently well-informed insider.

As the episode draws to a close, Maury brings us up to speed on the (still half-formed) U.K. online harms bill and explains why the U.K. government was willing to let the subsidiary of a Chinese company buy the U.K.’s biggest chip foundry. Sultan finds several insights in an excellent CNN story about the Great Conti Leak.

And, finally, I express my qualms about the indictment (for disclosing classified information) of Mark Unkenholz, a highly competent NSA lifer whom I knew while in government. To my mind the prosecutors are going to have to establish that Unkenholz did something very different from the kind of disclosures that were a standard part of his job. You can’t do the kind of commercial outreach he did without encountering tech companies that have no security clearances but plenty of capabilities valued by the intelligence community. You either give the companies’ uncleared execs enough classified information to understand what you need or you get no help. In that milieu, it simply isn’t enough for prosecutors to say, “He gave classified information to someone without a clearance; he should be in jail.”

Download the 401 Episode (mp3)

You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed.

Also, we’re in the market.  We will have a part-time opening for someone who’d like to do cyberlaw substantive work as well as sound editing and production on the podcast.  If you’re interested, send a cv to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com.

The post Maritime cybersecurity: All at sea appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/CPt2Nic
via IFTTT

Media ‘Caught In A Cover-Up’ Of Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story: Sen. Johnson

Media ‘Caught In A Cover-Up’ Of Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story: Sen. Johnson

Authored by Katabella Roberts via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on April 3 claimed that some major media outlets have been “caught in a cover-up” regarding the Hunter Biden laptop story.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) speaks during a hearing in Washington on Jan. 24, 2022. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Johnson’s remarks come shortly after The Washington Post and The New York Times published articles verifying and acknowledging the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, nearly two years after it was first reported by the New York Post shortly before the 2020 election.

However, the New York Post’s reporting of the scandal was promptly suppressed by social media sites including Facebook and Twitter, the latter of which also locked the NY Post’s account for more than two weeks, citing the outlet’s alleged publication of “hacked material” as its justification.

In an editorial titled “The Hunter Biden story is an opportunity for a reckoning,” The Washington Post blamed the reluctance among some media to publish the story on the possibility of it being one of the “unwitting tools of a Russian influence campaign in 2016” among other things.

The Post’s editorial board also stressed that President Joe Biden himself had not “acted corruptly.”

Johnson told Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures” that the recent admissions by both The New York Times and The Washington Post prove “how complicit the media was” in concealing Hunter Biden’s laptop before the 2020 presidential election.

I really think what the New York Times and Washington Post stories prove is how complicit they have been and continue to be in the cover-up,” Johnson said. “And, you know, quite honestly, they’re not impartial. They are the defenders of the Democratic Party of the radical left. You know, The Washington Post learned a lot from their coverage of Nixon. When you get caught up in a cover-up—and that’s what happened, the media get caught up in a cover-up. They are caught with their lies.”

Johnson said that some outlets had participated in “what they call a limited hangout or in [President Richard] Nixon’s case, a modified limited hangout. You’ve let out just enough information, just enough truth to try and get you by the moment.”

A modified limited hangout is a public relations or propaganda technique in which the individual or official involved releases some information that was previously hidden, albeit still retaining important key facts, in an effort to prevent more important details from being exposed.

According to former Central Intelligence Agency official Victor Marchetti, the technique results in the public being “so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”

We can’t allow our intelligence agencies, the Department of Justice, the FBI, or the media to get away with this,” Johnson said on Sunday. “This is serious business. This is incredible corruption at the highest levels of government and within our media.

“We are all being snookered by them. This has been a—from my standpoint—a massive diversionary operation to, you know, to try and take the American public’s attention away from their wrongdoing, their lies, their cover-ups.”

The GOP senator added that “now, we have actual bank records that verify what we reported” and that Hunter Biden’s “laptop is obviously a treasure-trove of additional corroborating evidence as well.”

According to a recent article for The Washington Post, which hired two security experts to authenticate what is purportedly Hunter Biden’s laptop, documents, and messages on the device, Biden pursued a deal with a Chinese Communist Party-linked emergency firm, CEFC China Energy, and its executives “paid $4.8 million to entities controlled by Hunter Biden and his uncle [James Biden].”

Further emails related to his work for the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings, for which he was a board member.

Former President Donald Trump previously claimed that Joe Biden, while still vice president, threatened to withhold $1 billion from Ukraine unless a prosecutor investigating Burisma Holdings was ousted.

White House chief of staff Ron Klain told ABC News’ “This Week” in an interview on Sunday that Biden believes his son didn’t break the law with regards to his overseas business ties in China, Ukraine, and other countries.

“Of course, the president is confident that his son didn’t break the law,” Klain said.

Biden himself has also stated that his son “did nothing wrong at Burisma.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 19:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/7NBrJzV Tyler Durden

Beijing Dispatches Military To Shanghai As Expanded Lockdown Triggers More Unrest

Beijing Dispatches Military To Shanghai As Expanded Lockdown Triggers More Unrest

As local authorities expand what was supposed to be a staggered, nine-day lockdown in Shanghai (China’s most populous city and also its financial hub), the CCP has decided to send in the military as the backlash worsens in a city that has become a critical battleground in the government’s fight to legitimize its “Zero COVID” policy.

After the city reported a record 9,000 COVID cases, the CCP announced the deployment of thousands of soldiers and military personnel to Shanghai in order for them to assist in the mandatory screening of all 25 million inhabitants (the latest in a seemingly interminable policy of mandatory testing). The next round of nucleic acid tests will begin Monday. The reinforcements include more than 2,000 military personnel and another 30,000 “medical workers”, per CNN.

The BBC pointed out that the latest lockdown will be “particularly costly” for China’s economy – and for western companies like Tesla and Disney which have major bases of operations in the city (including Tesla’s Shanghai gigafactory).

On top of this, Shanghai is a hub for semiconductor, electronics, car manufacturing and China’s financial services industry. It is also the world’s busiest shipping port.

The CCP has struggled to meet the needs of the local population, which has grown restive in the face of shortages of essential goods like food and medicine. Cases of locals dying after being turned away from local hospitals for non-COVID-related illnesses have also rattled them.

Xu Tianchen, China economist for the Economist Intelligence Unit, warned that short-term supply chain disruptions tied to the city’s lockdown could have a serious impact on China’s economy.

“There will also be ripple effects elsewhere because of the interconnectedness between Shanghai and other regions of China, especially the manufacturing hub of the Yangtze River Delta,” he said.

What’s more, consumer spending in a city known for its luxury storefronts has also fallen precipitously. Lost business at retailers, hotels, and restaurants could directly cost Shanghai 3.7% of its annual GDP.

All of this threatens to undermine China’s target for the country’s GDP: the CCP has promised growth of 5.5% this year, but a growing number of analysts doubt that the government will achieve this goal (unless its resorts to even larger-than-normal distortions in its official economic data).

Shanghai isn’t the only Chinese city to face mass lockdowns. Shenzhen, known as China’s technology hub, and the Province of Jilin, situated in China’s industrial heartland, have also faced lockdowns earlier in the year.

But as President Xi has called for increasingly “targeted” COVID restrictions to minimize the blowback for residents, some have taken to the country’s heavily censored social media platforms to address the growing chorus of concerns, and to accuse the CCP of breaking its ‘social compact’ to take care of the population. Locals have been particularly incensed by the CCP’s decision to separate COVID positive children from their parents, triggering a wave of outrage that swept across China’s social media.

Political pressure has been mounting on Shanghai authorities to both quell the outbreak and address the growing chorus of concerns from residents grappling with the costs and inconveniences of the stringent measures.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 19:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BWjF8nM Tyler Durden

Mask-Wearing Has Left A Generation Of Toddlers Struggling With Speech And Social Skills

Mask-Wearing Has Left A Generation Of Toddlers Struggling With Speech And Social Skills

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Lockdown restrictions, including adults wearing face masks, has left a generation of babies and toddlers struggling with speech and social skills, according to an official report.

Inspectors working for Ofsted found that infants being surrounded by adults wearing face masks for significant periods of time over the last two years has damaged their learning and communication abilities.

Those turning two “will have been surrounded by adults wearing masks for their whole lives and have therefore been unable to see lip movements or mouth shapes as regularly,” the report found.

“Some providers have reported that delays to children’s speech and language development have led to them not socialising with other children as readily as they would have expected previously,” it added.

The restrictions also left toddlers struggling with crawling, using the toilet independently and making friends.

Delays in learning had also regressed some children to the stage where they needed help with basic tasks such as putting on their coats and blowing their noses.

“I’m particularly worried about younger children’s development which, if left unaddressed, could potentially cause problems for primary schools down the line,” said chief inspector Amanda Spielman.

We previously highlighted another study out of Germany which found that the reading ability of children has plummeted compared to pre-COVID times thanks to lockdown policies that led to the closure of schools.

Speech therapist Jaclyn Theek said that mask wearing during the pandemic has caused a 364% increase in patient referrals of babies and toddlers.

“They’re not making any word attempts and not communicating at all with their family,” she said, adding that symptoms of autism are also skyrocketing.

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 19:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/hi2N05P Tyler Durden

Commodity Crucible: US Coal Hits Record High As French Power Prices Go Limit Up

Commodity Crucible: US Coal Hits Record High As French Power Prices Go Limit Up

If one pretends hard enough that the Ukraine war isn’t sending already record high commodity prices even higher, do commodity prices really rise? Unfortunately for much of the western world, the answer is yes, and not just oil and gasoline, but diesel. electricity, coal and even jet fuel.

At a time when Europe is desperately trying to come up with some brilliant scheme to wean itself away from Russian energy supplies (spoiler alert: there is none), French supermarkets have joined a national effort to curb the country’s electricity consumption, as cold weather and nuclear reactor outages pushed domestic power prices to a 13-year high.

The country’s largest retailer, Carrefour, said it was cutting power consumption Monday morning, heeding calls from France’s grid operator RTE to households and industries to reduce usage in order to tackle a surge in demand coupled with nuclear outages and colder weather. Carrefour told Bloomberg that it is using methods like “reducing heating in offices, and dimming lighting in the group’s 400 stores across the country.” Adding insult to injury, in a stunning twist, one which nobody can blame on Putin (but they can sure blame on Greta), Bloomberg writes that as many as 25 of state-run utility Electricite de France SA’s 56 nuclear reactors are offline, just as overnight temperatures in most of the country are set to fall below freezing.

With a collapse in electricity production, power deliveries between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. Paris time surged to as much as 2,987.89 euros ($3,286) per megawatt-hour, while the average price for the entire day settled at 551.43 euros on the Epex Spot SE’s day-ahead auction, the most since a record set in October 2009. It was also high enough to trigger an increase of the maximum upper price limit on power exchanges across Europe. 

To be sure, France has an alternative to draconian power conservation: freezing. Households turned up electrical heating amid freezing temperatures across the country on Sunday night, which was the coldest for that period of the year since 1947, according to Meteo France. A return to warmer weather is expected Tuesday, with close to average temperatures seen, at least until the next cold snap.

Meanwhile, as French power prices were trading limit up, the commodity crucible also hit the US where while oil was trading around $100 thanks to Biden’s desperate political gamble to dump a third of the US SPR ahead of the midterms in hopes of keeping gas prices low, U.S. coal prices topped $100 a ton for the first time in 13 years.

While prices for coal from Central Appalachia surged 9% to $106.15 a ton last week, the highest since late 2008, prices in the Illinois Basin rose to $109.55, topping $100 for the first time in records dating to 2005. The surge matches increases around the world as the Ukraine war prompts users to seek alternatives to Russian coal, which accounted for almost 18% of global exports in 2020. That’s exacerbating a surge in demand that began last year as a global economic recovery from pandemic drove up electricity consumption.

Prices in Central Appalachia and the Illinois basin are rising more than in other U.S. coal-producing regions because they have easier access to international markets. U.S. exports climbed 23% last year and are expected to increase another 3.3% this year as miners take advantage of record international prices.

In its recent discussion of the record surge in coal prices, Bank of America writes that Newcastle coal prices surged to record highs, $440/t, in early March as chaos swept through global commodity markets in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. While Russia is the world’s largest exporter of natural gas, it is also the world’s third-largest exporter of thermal coal, trailing only Indonesia and Australia. Last year Russia accounted for roughly 15% of the seaborne thermal coal market and shipped nearly 150 mn tons of thermal coal around the globe and made up roughly half of Europe’s coal imports. The disruption of Russian coal supply is just the latest in a wave of supply issues that have hounded the market since early last year.

And yet, despite record prices last year, major thermal coal suppliers struggled to boost output due to a litany of issues including weather events, rail disruptions, Covid outbreaks, and equipment shortages. Then, for most of January, Indonesia, the world’s largest coal exporter, banned coal exports to combat low domestic stockpiles, sending Newcastle prices to over $220/t and leaving the seaborne market with little room to maneuver. Then, Russia invaded Ukraine at the end of February, which threatened further disruption to global coal supplies, launching Newcastle prices to well over $400/t before retreating some in recent weeks. Adding further flames to the coal fire, record-high European natural gas prices have incentivized near maximum coal generation in Europe. Despite the rally, thermal coal remains one of the cheapest MMBtu’s on the planet, with a gas equivalent cost of around $15/MMBtu, significantly cheaper than crude at $25/MMBtu or global natural gas near $35/MMBtu.

Adding to the supply issues, Russia accounted for over 25% of the world’s high calorific value (CV) coal exports, which has driven high CV coal to record premiums over low quality coal. While an increase in Indonesian exports could help offset the lost tonnage from Russia, it won’t make up for the quality difference. With supply issues abounding, the market will have to balance through demand destruction. India, one of the world’s largest importers, has historically been a very price-sensitive buyer, and BofA expects imports to eventually decline this year to the lowest level since 2013.

“The energy fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could last for a while,” Michelle Bloodworth, CEO of coal-power trade group America’s Power, told Bloomberg in an interview. “Coal is going to be needed for the foreseeable future.”

Which is odd considering the past 4 years were spent by the environmentalists and their teenage god to wean the world away from coal. Almost as if all of that was one giant spectacle, and meanwhile reliance on coal only grew!

But wait, the absurdity gets better: while U.S. power producers have reportedly been quote unquote shifting away from coal, consumption actually jumped last yearas in before the Ukraine war- as prices also increased for natural gas.

The bottom line is that American consumers, already facing the highest inflation in four decades and paying higher utility bills, as food prices are surging and housing costs are up, are about to pay up even more and Biden will be scrambling to find even more creative ways to blame it all on Putin (which almost explains why the US appears so perplexingly interested in perpetuating the Ukraine war).

The hilarious conclusion to this tragic story, however, comes from Bloomberg which notes that the rebound in coal comes as a United Nations-backed panel of climate scientists warned Monday that the world may be on track to warm at a pace that would painfully remake societies and life on the planet. In other words, the Ukraine war crisis is already being put to use by the same crony capitalists who will now be pushing very hard to greenlight the $150 trillion in spending (and QE) needed to usher in the “green” agenda (as described in “Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The “Crusade” Against Climate Change“). All they need is a strong enough deflationary crisis that transitions the current inflation-fighting posture to a world permitting nearly $5 trillion in annual QE. We are confident they will find it.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 18:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2NDkcwO Tyler Durden

Florida Voter Registration: Republicans Overtake Democrats By 100,000

Florida Voter Registration: Republicans Overtake Democrats By 100,000

Authored by Patricia Tolson via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

As the Aug. 23 Florida primary draws near, data released by the office of Gov. Ron DeSantis shows there are 100,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in the Sunshine State.

Voters wait in line to cast their ballots in Riviera Beach, Fla., on Nov. 2, 2004. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

In November 2021, DeSantis announced that Florida—where Democrats held an advantage over Republicans of well over 260,000 voters when he took office in 2019—saw a net gain of over 300,000 new Republican voters.

On Feb. 28, 2022, the Florida Department of State reported there were 5,135,377 registered Republicans and 5,045,849 registered Democrats, a difference of 89,528.

But according to the new data released by the governor’s office, there are now 5,145,878 registered Republicans and 5,044,802 registered Democrats, a staggering difference of 101,076. More startling is the revelation that the historically blue stronghold of Miami-Dade County is losing Democratic voters. As of April 1, 2022, there were 585,882 registered Democrats in Miami-Dade, compared to 427,000 Republicans. At the end of 2021, Miami-Dade had 594,924 registered Democrats, a loss of more than 9,000 voters in three months.

That’s a tumble of nearly 41,000 from the 635,842 registered Democrats in Miami-Dade at the end of 2020.

In Hernando County, where Republicans have traditionally held a majority, the number of registered Democrats (40,262) has fallen to third place below Republicans (64,488) and “others” (41,595) for the first time in its nearly 180-year history.

Florida was the No. 1 relocation destination for Americans in 2020, as The Epoch Times reported June 9, 2021. New York and California, both heavily Democratic, took first and second place in the contest for which states had the most people choosing to leave. In 2021, Florida fell to second place as the most popular relocation state behind Texas, according to data released by the U.S. Census Bureau.

A number of factors have been cited by DeSantis to account for the influx of new residents.

Florida has no state income tax and does not assess an estate tax, or an inheritance tax. It also has property taxes below the national average. However, the governor insists that what’s attracting people to Florida is his refusal to allow the rights of Florida’s residents—particularly parents—to be restricted by liberal ideologies and policies.

DeSantis refused to allow extended lockdowns on schools and businesses in the wake of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus, and he banned forced masking and critical race theory from public schools. In May 2021, he signed Senate Bill 2006, effectively banning vaccine passports. In July 2021, DeSantis signed the Parents’ Bill of Rights into law, providing parents with control of their child’s education, upbringing, and health care. And on Dec. 15, 2021, DeSantis announced the Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees (W.O.K.E.) Act, “a legislative proposal that will give businesses, employees, children, and families tools to fight back against woke indoctrination.”

On June 15, 2021, The Epoch Times reported on the advice offered by Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd to those moving to Florida from blue states: “Do me a favor,” and “don’t vote the way the majority of the people voted from where you came, or you’ll have here what you had there. Guaranteed.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 18:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/hmrD5uv Tyler Durden

SoftBank Shutters Hedge Fund Unit Behind Infamous ‘Nasdaq Whale’ Trades

SoftBank Shutters Hedge Fund Unit Behind Infamous ‘Nasdaq Whale’ Trades

So much has changed since the summer of 2020, when a mysterious entity nicknamed “the Nasdaq Whale” (later revealed to be SoftBank acting via its internal hedge fund unit, SB Northstar) triggered an epic meltup in tech shares by gobbling up billions of dollars in call options on NASDAQ megacap companies (along with, to a lesser extent, the index and underlying stocks), forcing dealers to delta-hedge, triggering the gamma squeeze of a lifetime.

Initially, we (and others) suspected that this phenomenon was the result of retail traders run amok. But months later, after the meltup started to unravel, it was revealed that a single buyer – SoftBank – was largely driving the trend (which eventually sucked in front-running dealers and trend-chasing retail traders).

At one point, the ‘Whale’ positions became so massive that trading volume in single-stock options eclipsed the volume in the underlying.

As we explained at the time, SB Northstar’s “positive gamma” strategy played out like this: the fund bought up single name megacap tech stocks, then propelled its positions even higher by buying up massive quantities of out of the money calls in the same stocks, accelerating a gamma feedback loop (that was also fed by front-running dealers and a generation of aggressive meme-stock traders).

The massive call buying caused major distortions in implied volatility (a result of forced dealer hedging), causing a measure of the Nasdaq’s IV to soar as the index itself was surging to then all-time highs.

Nearly one year later, SoftBank followed up with the second part of this trading strategy: it dumped billions of dollars in megacap names, using the profits to plow more money into early-stage startups.

It was around this time that SoftBank’s trading strategy began to unravel as its positions moved aggressively against it as the CCP blew up Chinese stocks (SoftBank lost nearly $10 billion on its Didi position alone), SPAC stocks tumbled and the tech sector (particularly the aggressive growth plays embraced by SoftBank and ARK) tumbled as inflation soared and central banks began to telegraph their plans for hiking interest rates.

Now, as SoftBank shares tumble to their lowest level in years, forcing it to halt new investments and liquidate existing positions as founder and chairman Masa Son has seen $25 billion evaporate

…the FT reports that SB Northstar has officially been shuttered after racking up between $6 billion and $7 billion in losses. The closure isn’t exactly a surprise: Son has been telegraphing its demise since November.

Key personnel from the fund have departed SoftBank, including Akshay Naheta, the former Deutsche Bank trader who ran the unit. He reportedly left SoftBank on Thursday, according to the FT’s sources.

Naheta became notorious for both the Nasdaq Whale trades and his bet on Wirefraud Wirecard The 40-year-old is known for executing complex derivative transactions and earned notoriety for spearheading SoftBank’s controversial bet on the shares of fraudulent payments company Wirecard. Now that he’s unemployed, perhaps he can spend more time advocating for the government to ‘socialize’ investors’ gains, something that President Biden is now trying to do with his ‘Minimum Billionaire Tax’ proposal.

Regulatory filings show that SB Management (Northstar’s investment management unit) had a little over $1 billion in US-listed stocks as of the end of 2021.

That’s down from more than $17 billion one year earlier. The bulk of its remaining positions were in special purpose acquisition companies, including vehicles sponsored by Elliott Management, Vision Fund investor Mubadala and SoftBank’s own Vision Funds.

Importantly, roughly one-third of the hedge fund unit’s money came not from SoftBank, but from Masa Son’s personal fortune. Last year, Son revealed that his holding in Northstar had personally cost him about $1.5 billion, a figure that would have increased given the further losses incurred unwinding its portfolio.

As SoftBank starts to more closely resemble a melting ice cube (having reportedly suffered more than $20 billion in portfolio losses during Q1 alone), the closure of SB Northstar is just the latest sign that we were on to something back in October 2019 (nearly a year before ‘the Nasdaq Whale’ trades began) when we suggested that SoftBank might be the tech bubble era’s “short of the century”.

But while Masa Son’s personal fortune is closely tied up in SoftBank shares (which the firm has used as collateral to leverage its investments by borrowing against its shares, setting the company up for a brutal margin call as nervous lenders demand more repayment, forcing more liquidations that could push the company into a vicious feedback loop), Japanese retirees (who are among the biggest investors in SoftBank) could also be on the hook for billions of losses.

Since allowing SoftBank to fail would be massively unpopular in Japan, we can’t help but wonder: how much more pain will the Japanese government tolerate before pushing the BoJ to bail out the telecoms giant/VC investor/’conductor of the AI revolution’ since it’s now officially ‘too big to fail’?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 04/04/2022 – 18:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Cxketyj Tyler Durden