Watch: Biden Press Secretary Defends Him Continually Stumbling And Falling Over

Watch: Biden Press Secretary Defends Him Continually Stumbling And Falling Over

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre again attempted to brush off concerns that Joe Biden is constantly stumbling around and falling over, claiming “things happen,” and that “other Presidents have had similar situations.” 

Jean-Pierre was questioned by NewsMax’s James Rosen who pointed out that Americans are concerned that Biden isn’t fit to run for another four year term as he appears frail.

“I want to ask about the President’s tumble that he took on the stage in Colorado the other day,” Rosen began, adding “It’s absolutely true that any one of us could trip over an object that just happens to be in our path. Nonetheless. We’ve all observed the difficulty this President has in certain settings.”

“Steps are one of them and of course there was no sand bag in his path on the steps up Air Force One on any of those occasions,” Rosen noted, adding “I was struck particularly by the incident on May 19, in Hiroshima where the President descended down a set of stone steps toward a shrine.”

“At the bottom of which steps he was greeted by the Japanese Prime Minister. And if you look at that footage, the President slipped and caught himself on those steps. And as he greeted the Prime Minister, you could even see on the president’s face, pursed lips as if to say this was a close one,” Rosen continued. 

Here is the incident Rosen is referring to:

And here is the fall in Colorado:

The reporter then asked “whether this whole series of incidents has led the White House Chief of Staff to direct some kind of review of the advance procedures that are employed on behalf of this, the nation’s oldest President?”

Jean-Pierre was having none of it, claiming she didn’t see anything that happened in Japan and then listing achievements Biden has accomplished as some sort of counter balance to him stumbling around.

“Your proposition may or may not be true, but it’s not responsive to my question,” Rosen responded.

The Press Secretary snapped back “You’re asking me if we’re going to change anything from here, the Chief of Staff has asked for it to change anything from here. And here’s the thing, here’s the thing. We are not. Things happen. Other Presidents have had similar situations.” 

And with that she ended the press conference.

Watch:

Yesterday the Press Secretary refused to comment on whether Biden would actually survive another four years:

*  *  *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Also, we urgently need your financial support here.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 12:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Hx9Ww78 Tyler Durden

Small Caps Soar As Tech Tumbles – Soft-Landing Narrative Builds

Small Caps Soar As Tech Tumbles – Soft-Landing Narrative Builds

The recent escape-velocity melt-up in mega-cap tech – at the expense of almost every other asset – sent relative valuations to a remarkably coincidental level. The ratio of Nasdaq 100 to Russell 2000 hit its Feb 2000 (DotCom peak) record high last week as the blowout jobs report hit…

Source: Bloomberg

We asked at the time: “Did the QQQ/RTY trade just peak?”

5 days later, we have an answer – yes, bigly!

Source: Bloomberg

As Small Caps are up 7% while Nasdaq is down 0.5%…

Today’s continued Small Cap outperformance follows record call volumes in IWM yesterday

Notably, as Goldman Sachs points out, the soft-landing narrative is once again gaining traction and so-called safe-haven flows into mega-cap tech are unwinding (as shown below Goldman’s ‘Soft Landing’ basket is breaking out)…

Source: Bloomberg

IWM may highlight a general theme of “bargain shopping”, wherein those sectors & names which have struggled, finally catch a bid.

Perhaps most ominously, the recent exuberance in Nasdaq’s big names has come at a time of tightening financial conditions as ‘AI trumped The Fed’ – is that exuberant unwind about to assert itself?

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, adding more ammunition to this reversal, Goldman notes that CTAs are currently short R2K (the only index this cohort is short) and providing a tailwind for the market with one month baseline demand estimates the largest in two years.

In other words, as we noted previously, while the S&P may continue to go nowhere (and especially the equal-weighted S&P), prepare for a violent reverse rotation below the surface as the historic outperformance in tech, and crushing underperformance in small caps, is set go in the other direction.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 12:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/JGiHFM6 Tyler Durden

What Central Banks Giveth They Taketh Away; Wave Of Corporate Defaults On The Horizon

What Central Banks Giveth They Taketh Away; Wave Of Corporate Defaults On The Horizon

Authored by Michael Maharrey via SchiffGold.com,

With a debt ceiling deal done, the threat of a US government default is off the table for the time being. But a wave of corporate defaults is on the horizon according to Deutsche Bank’s annual default study.

This is the inevitable consequence of central bank monetary policy and it was entirely predictable.

Deutsche Bank strategists Jim Reid and Steve Caprio say that corporate defaults will become “more normal” as we enter into a default cycle thanks to higher interest rates and a growing number of over-leveraged companies.

Our cycle indicators signal a default wave is imminent. The tightest Fed and ECB policy in 15 years is colliding with high leverage built upon stretched margins. And tactically, our US credit cycle gauge is producing its highest non-pandemic warning signal to investors, since before the GFC [Great Financial Crisis].

The Deutsche Bank study projects defaults for US high-yield debt will peak at around 9% in late 2024. For comparison, the high-yield default rate was a mere 0.5% in 2021 and 1.3% in 2022.

The study predicts that the looming recession will create significant pain in the world’s credit markets, similar to the dot-com bust.

Corporate leverage is elevated. And global credit markets derive more of their revenue from manufacturing and the sale of physical goods than the real economy at large. Going forward, corporates will likely lose pricing power on their sale of physical goods, due to high inventory builds and a post-COVID demand shift from goods to services. But labor costs are likely to remain sticky, because of a shrinking working-age population and a desire for consumers to recoup nearly 2 years of negative real wage growth.”

Bank of America also forecasts a wave of defaults. According to its analysis, defaults could rise to $1 trillion if the US economy enters into a full-blown recession.

Meanwhile, Moody’s expects defaults on speculative-grade corporate debt globally will rise to 4.6% by the end of this year, up from 2.9% in March.

We’re already seeing a rise in corporate defaults. More companies globally defaulted in Q1 2023 than during any quarter since late 2020 at the peak of the government COVID lockdowns.  Moody’s reported that 33 corporations it rates defaulted on their debts in the first quarter with 15 of those defaults coming in March.

What the Central Banks Giveth Central Banks Taketh Away

Central banks globally blew up this giant debt bubble with nearly two decades of artificially low interest rates. Central banks pushed rates to zero in the wake of the Great Recession and some banks, including the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan took rates negative. Despite some efforts by the Federal Reserve to normalize rates in the mid to late 2010s, it never succeeded and had already started cutting rates due to shakiness in the economy before COVID. During the pandemic, central banks doubled down on their easy money policies.

The whole point of this monetary policy was to incentivize borrowing to “stimulate” the economy.

It worked.

Global debt hit a record $300 trillion at the end of 2022, according to data from S&P Global. That equals 349% leverage against global GDP and $37,500 of average debt for each person in the world.

Since 2000, non-financial corporate debt across America and Europe has grown from $12.7 trillion to $38.1 trillion, a 200% increase. Meanwhile, the percentage of US speculative-grade issuers of “B-” ratings and below doubled, to 36%, in September 2022 compared with September 2007.

Most people just assumed a low interest rate environment was the new normal. But in the wake of the COVID stimulus, price inflation finally caught up with the central banks, forcing them to raise interest rates.

Low-interest rates are the mother’s milk of a global economy built on easy money and debt. With interest rates rising, the bubbles are starting to pop.

What nobody seems willing to say out loud is that this problem falls squarely on the shoulders of governments and central banks. They implemented policies intended to incentivize the accumulation of debt. They created trillions of dollars out of thin air and showered the world with stimulus, unleashing the inflation monster. And now they’re trying to battle the dragon they set loose by raising interest rates. This will inevitably pop the bubble they intentionally blew up.

All of this was entirely predictable.

The US government is about to exacerbate the problem. With the debt ceiling out of the way, the US Treasury will have to go on a borrowing binge in order to replenish the cash reserves it spent while the government was up against the borrowing limit.

According to an analysis by Goldman Sachs, the US Treasury will likely need to sell around $700 billion in T-bills within six to eight weeks of a debt ceiling deal just to replenish cash reserves spent down while the government was up against the borrowing limit. On a net basis, the Treasury will likely have to sell more than $1 trillion in Treasuries this year.

The market may be able to absorb all of that paper, but it will almost certainly cause interest rates to rise even more as the sale drains liquidity out of the market.

This liquidity crunch will also spill over into the corporate bond market. The price of non-government debt instruments will have to fall as well in order to compete with Treasury bonds. That means the cost of borrowing will go up for everybody, making it harder for over-leveraged companies to refinance.

It’s likely that Deutsche Bank and other mainstream analysts are underestimating the extent of the default problem coming at us like a freight train.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 12:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/0bd5eMI Tyler Durden

The Great Success of Artificial Intelligence

Many people have long doubted that AI can really simulate humans. But recent news made me a believer. Making up plausible-seeming but utterly false statements, and asserting them as true with no shame but with total assurance? That’s about as human as you can get.

The post The Great Success of Artificial Intelligence appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/L9OasUB
via IFTTT

Biden’s ATF Can’t Stop Cody Wilson’s Ghost Guns


Headshot of Cody Wilson on a blue ombre background next to a printed gun

When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) issued a new rule to expand the definition of “firearm” to encompass “weapon parts kit[s]…designed to or may readily be assembled, completed, converted, or restored,” Defense Distributed‘s Cody Wilson, creator of the 3D printed “Liberator” gun, did what he always does: He fought back.

Defense Distributed previously fought the State Department, which in 2013 had ordered them to remove the digital gun files from their company website. The parties reached a 2018 settlement allowing the files to stay up, and the 9th Circuit Court in 2021 ruled against the 22 states that tried to stop the implementation of that State Department settlement. New Jersey’s attorney general has continued to fight Defense Distributed over the right to distribute its gun files and recently lost its appeal to move the case out of the Western District of Texas.

And in this latest case against the ATF, Wilson and Defense Distributed have once again prevailed—for now. In early March, Defense Distributed won an injunction from the U.S. District of Court of the Northern District of Texas that will allow the company to avoid “irreparable harm” by continuing to sell their unfinished firearms components as the case proceeds.

Join Reason‘s Nick Gillespie and Zach Weissmueller for a live discussion with Wilson this Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern. Topics will include Wilson’s ongoing fight with the ATF, the future of “ghost guns” in increasingly hostile states like California, his methods of “practical anarchy,” and the underlying philosophical beliefs that compel him to fight these prolonged legal and political battles.

Watch and leave questions and comments on the YouTube video above or on Reason‘s Facebook page.

The post Biden's ATF Can't Stop Cody Wilson's Ghost Guns appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/8YJT9uk
via IFTTT

Permitting Reforms in Debt Ceiling Bill Will Accomplish Little


Electric transmission lines in front of a sunset

Unlike most major pieces of legislation that make it through Congress these days, the bill to raise the federal government’s debt ceiling was not larded up with hundreds or thousands of pages of unrelated policy.

But while most of the relatively trim Fiscal Responsibility Act was focused on the debt ceiling and a variety of associated provisions, like the non-defense discretionary spending caps imposed for the next two years, there was still room for a few unrelated items. Most significant among them: minor changes to federal environmental review processes aimed at reducing the absurd obstacles often placed on private and public infrastructure projects.

Environmental reviews and other permitting requirements are slowing the roll-out of green energy projects, delaying much-needed expansions of America’s power grid, and driving up the cost to build just about anything. It took 15 years for an electric supply line connecting a wind farm in Wyoming to the growing Las Vegas suburbs to clear all the permitting hurdles. That’s an arrangement that’s simply incompatible with a dynamic, growing economy.

The Fiscal Responsibility Act falls well short of solving those problems. Still, it might serve as an indication of bipartisan interest in addressing this mess.

“The permitting changes in the debt ceiling deal are a very small step in the right direction—emphasis on ‘small,'” Alec Stapp, co-founder of the Institute for Progress, which advocates for policies that accelerate technological and industrial progress, tells Reason. 

The most significant policy change—or, perhaps, the least insignificant—is new limits on how long mandatory National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews can take. The Fiscal Responsibility Act incorporated some changes first proposed by the Trump administration’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in 2020 to limit NEPA environmental reviews to no more than two years and the resulting environmental impact statements to no more than 150 pages.

That’s a welcome change. As part of the process that originally produced those suggestions, the CEQ found that the average environmental impact study is 661 pages and typically takes more than four years to complete. Time is money, and all those delays are expensive. In its report, the CEQ cited a study, by the nonpartisan reform coalition Common Good, estimating that “the cost of a 6–year delay in starting construction on public projects costs the nation over $3.9 trillion, including the cost of prolonged inefficiencies and avoidable pollution,” as Reason‘s Ron Bailey reported at the time.

The environmental impact of major infrastructure projects is important to consider, but NEPA has devolved into a tool often wielded by opponents of development rather than sincere concern for the plight of the sage grouse. Placing limits on how long NEPA can delay a building project makes a lot of sense.

The NEPA tweaks included in the Fiscal Responsibility Act will “slightly improve the process,” says Stapp, “but the biggest problem—judicial review—was left untouched.”

Indeed, the Fiscal Responsibility Act’s limits on NEPA reviews don’t apply to the often-inevitable litigation that spirals out from them. Without that component, the new rules have a giant loophole—one that opponents of new construction will continue using to delay and drive up costs.

There’s one major exception to that, however. The Fiscal Responsibility Act does specifically exempt from judicial review one project: The Mountain Valley Pipeline, currently under construction in Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D–W.Va.) home state. “No court shall have jurisdiction to review any action taken by” federal or state agencies to issue permits “necessary for the construction and initial operation at full capacity of the Mountain Valley Pipeline,” the law reads, in part.

There are two ways to look at the Mountain Valley Pipeline carve-out in the law. It could be a special giveaway to Manchin, a crucial swing vote in the Senate and longtime advocate for permitting reform, to secure his support for the debt ceiling bill. Alternatively, it might be a precedent-setting example of how Congress can flex its authority to speed up critical infrastructure projects in the future. Only time will tell which it is.

After decades of expanding NEPA reviews and growing piles of red tape, even a small step in the right direction matters. The “give-and-take” necessary to get the Fiscal Responsibility Act through Congress with bipartisan support “naturally restrained its scope in any given direction,” writes Dan Goldbeck, director of regulatory policy for the American Action Forum, a free market think tank. “One hopes that substantive discussions on this topic will continue and that those conducted under non-crisis circumstances will yield a more robust set of reforms.”

When it comes to permitting reform, the Fiscal Responsibility Act is likely to serve more of a directional purpose than a substantial one. It’s an important acknowledgment of congressional support for limiting the NEPA process—a reform that should have been incorporated in President Joe Biden’s major infrastructure bill, if we’re being honest—even if it falls well short of fixing the problem.

The post Permitting Reforms in Debt Ceiling Bill Will Accomplish Little appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest https://ift.tt/FvrzO5j
via IFTTT

Tucker Carlson’s Twitter Debut Goes Mega-Viral; Former Fox Host Crushes Ratings While Taylor Lorenz Embarrasses Herself (Again)

Tucker Carlson’s Twitter Debut Goes Mega-Viral; Former Fox Host Crushes Ratings While Taylor Lorenz Embarrasses Herself (Again)

Tucker Carlson’s first Twitter broadcast went mega-viral Tuesday night, racking up 71.6 million views in less than 24 hours.

Screenshot, twitter.com

During the 10 minute monologue, Carlson slammed Ukraine war mongers, and took the media to task for ignoring the “bombshell of the millennium” in which a government whistleblower revealed that craft developed by non-human intelligence has been recovered by governments around the world.

“Nobody knows what’s happening. A small group of people control accesses to all relevant information. And the rest of us don’t know. We’re allowed to yap all we want about racism, but go ahead and talk about something that really matters and see what happens. If you keep it up, they’ll make you be quiet. Trust us. That’s how they maintain control,” said Carlson.

Needless to say, Tucker’s first broadcast knocked it out of the park, further validating Twitter as a legitimate platform for major media (that isn’t “Brought to you by Pfizer” so to speak).

For context, Fox News‘ 7pm broadcast of Jesse Watters reached 2 million viewers on June 5th, per Mediaite, while the Fox News rotation which has replaced Carlson’s 8pm time slot hit just 1.5 million viewers Monday night.

Meanwhile, rich kid propagandist Taylor Lorenz made an absolute ass of herself trying to criticize Carlson’s views – tweeting “It’s wild to see what a fish out of water he is on the internet: no jump cuts, no background music, no catchy thumbnail or video title. Not sure how he’s going to stack up against even an average streamer or youtuber.”

Oh…

The losers at Business Insider picked up on Lorenz’s tweet, casting doubt on Carlson’s future, claiming:

  • Tucker Carlson is in trouble, if his first livestream is anything to go by. 
  • The first episode of his Twitter stream debut lacked the shine of his Fox News glory days.
  • Without the chyron and quick cuts, Carlson must now compete with the likes of Alex Jones — and he’s losing.

Screenshot, businessinsider.com

We think we know what’s going on here…

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 11:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/aonYxF7 Tyler Durden

Rickards: How Does This End Well?

Rickards: How Does This End Well?

Authored by James Rickards via DailyReckoning.com,

It looks like the much-anticipated Ukrainian spring offensive may finally be getting underway. Yesterday, Russia repelled Ukrainian attacks in five places.

It’s very early — these were likely probing attacks looking to detect weak points in Russian defensive positions — but these attacks were much heavier than previous probing attacks.

We’ll have to see what happens.

When the main offensive comes, it’s very possible that Ukrainian forces will break through in certain areas. They might capture some territory (with plenty of U.S./NATO-supplied reconnaissance and intelligence to assist them), but it’s unlikely that their gains will be sustainable.

The offensive will probably peter out as Russian forces gradually grind it down.

Russia has several defensive lines in the region, fortified by minefields, anti-tank ditches, concrete obstacles known as dragon’s teeth, etc. These are formidable defenses that Russia has spent several months creating.

If Ukraine breaks through one line, it’ll have to confront another. And another. And another one after that.

It’s also important to realize that offensives on the scale envisioned require massive logistical support, and it’s far from clear that Ukraine has the resources to sustain a major offensive. It doesn’t help that Russia has been steadily targeting Ukrainian ammunition depots, transportation links, marshaling points, etc.

Meanwhile, Zelensky wants more Patriot missile systems. That’s because the Russians have already destroyed one-third of the systems we sent.

As I’ve argued before, Russia is winning the war. The West can’t afford to give Ukraine much more weaponry, and support for the war effort is declining.

Negotiation or Escalation

All that remains is negotiation or escalation toward nuclear war. Unfortunately, Biden will probably choose to escalate.

First he said no tanks, then he agreed to send tanks. Then he said no F-16s, now he’s agreed to send F-16s. There’s no reason to believe it’ll end there. Biden’s in way too deep to just walk away at this point.

And there’s certainly no reason to believe that Biden will relent on the anti-Russian economic sanctions. In fact, even more sanctions are being imposed.

Here’s the latest sanctions announcement from the U.S. as reported by Stratfor recently:

The United States enacted new sanctions on 69 Russian entities, one Armenian entity and one Kyrgyz entity, as well as halted the export of a wide range of up to 1,200 additional products and consumer goods to Russia, Reuters reported on May 19. The new sanctions and restrictions are part of the United States’ realization of the Group of Seven’s recent statement on Ukraine declaring the group’s intent to expand sanctions on Russia.

The measures suggest greater emphasis on blocking those who circumvent or facilitate the circumvention of sanctions, but the sanctions are unlikely to stop the emergence of new circumvention schemes or impede Russia’s ability to continue the war in Ukraine. Still, they will create new compliance risks for companies across a range of sectors from consumer goods to high technology that now must ensure that their business activities do not run afoul of the new measures.

In April, the International Monetary Fund further improved its forecast for Russia’s economy, which it sees growing by 0.7% this year, up 0.4 percentage points from the January forecast.

The Failure of Sanctions

The starting place for analysis is to realize that these anti-Russian sanctions are unprecedented as to the scope and the number of entities affected. The U.S. has frozen the bank accounts of the Russian Central Bank and a long list of Russian companies. It has kicked Russia out of the global interbank message traffic system called SWIFT.

It’s not too much to call SWIFT the central nervous system of the global financial system. Banning Russia greatly impedes the ability of their banks to make payments even if they are using currencies other than the U.S. dollar and transacting with non-U.S. banks.

U.S. companies by the thousands have closed up shop in Russia. They have either shut down their operations or temporarily suspended them. U.S. persons are prohibited from making new investments in Russia under pain of severe fines or imprisonment.

Strategic metals exports from Russia have been banned in many cases. Imports to Russia of semiconductors and other high-tech outputs and equipment have been banned. Russian oil exports by tankers have been prohibited.

This oil ban has been backed up by a separate ban on cargo and vessel insurance from major providers such as Lloyd’s of London. Without insurance, most parties won’t ship or purchase the oil.

The list goes on. New targets and sanctions are being announced continually. What has been the result of this global financial sanctions war?

It has been a complete failure. Russia is clearly winning the kinetic war on the ground in Ukraine, and it’s winning the financial war as well.

This Wasn’t in the Playbook

The Russian ruble is as strong as it was before the Russian invasion. Biden’s claim that sanctions would “destroy” the ruble was just hot air. The Russian economy declined about 3% in 2022 after critics claimed it would crash by 10% or more.

This year, Russia is projected to grow 0.7% by the IMF at a time when many analysts expect the U.S. economy to fall into a severe recession.

Russia has easily been able to evade sanctions on oil exports by using a “ghost fleet” of vessels that turn off transponders and engage in ship-to-ship oil transfers to mask the identity of the seller at the port of discharge.

There’s nothing surprising about this. Mastermind commodity trader Marc Rich did the same thing to evade oil export sanctions on Iran and Iraq in the 1990s and 2000s from his chateau in Zug, Switzerland.

The insurance bans have also proved ineffective. There are easy workarounds including self-insurance, captive insurance companies, and insurance from companies that are not participating in the boycott.

More recently, the U.S. has imposed further sanctions on two major gold mining companies in Russia. This is nonsense put on for show. Gold is an element, atomic number 79. Once it is melted and recast into generic bars it is untraceable. It can be moved secretly around the world by air and sold in markets from Shanghai to Singapore.

Gold is gold and it will go where it wants. The U.S. sanctions will have no impact except to increase costs in global trade.

The Desperation of Secondary Boycotts

Indeed, many of the most important countries in the world are maintaining a neutral stance and are not supporting U.S. sanctions. These neutral parties include India, China, South Africa, and Brazil, which collectively include almost 40% of the earth’s population.

India, China and Brazil are three of the ten largest economies in the world and collectively produce 24% of global GDP.

What’s new about the recent sanctions report quoted above is the U.S. is now getting desperate about the failure of sanctions to damage Russia or change Russian behavior in Ukraine.

The U.S. has begun imposing what are called secondary boycotts. This means that the sanctions do not target Russia directly, but target countries that do business with Russia and do not follow U.S. orders.

For example, China is reported to be selling semiconductors to Russia even as Brazil sells aircraft and India sells drones. China and India also purchase oil from Russia. It is also reported that South Africa has begun weapons sales to Russia.

All of these sales are in violation of U.S. sanctions. Reportedly, the U.S. will begin imposing separate sanctions on China, Brazil, India, and South Africa for not adhering to U.S. sanctions.

How Does This End Well?

These new secondary boycott sanctions will not be well-received. China, Brazil, India, and South Africa will not passively absorb the secondary boycotts.

They will retaliate in their own way. The tit-for-tax sanctions will not impede Russia at all, but they will lead to a further contraction of world trade, something last seen during the Great Depression.

Biden claims that the sanctions will not end until Russia withdraws entirely from Ukraine, including Crimea. Not only will Russia not withdraw, it continues to make major military and territorial gains. A Ukrainian offensive won’t fundamentally change that reality, unless it somehow manages to overcome very long odds.

This means the sanctions will continue indefinitely.

It also means Biden has created a major drag on world trade on top of the other headwinds already facing the global economy.

Investors will be well-served by allocating assets toward cash, gold, and other hard assets. These will be the real winners as the war in Ukraine drags on.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 11:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2KAr4pg Tyler Durden

Do The Biggest Stocks Still Have Room To Run?

Do The Biggest Stocks Still Have Room To Run?

Authored by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

The largest-market-cap stocks and the Nasdaq do not yet look historically overbought, meaning they may have more upside potential.

With stocks like Nvidia reaching for the moon, it might seem plain as day that mega-cap stocks are overbought. While that is true using RSIs, stochastics, etc., it is not the case when you compare their behavior to previous bear markets.

This has been a two-speed market this year. That’s why it makes more sense to look at the underlying picture rather than focusing solely on the broad index.

In this vein, we can create a “Top 5” index of the largest S&P 500 stocks by market cap through time, and a residual index of the remaining stocks. We can then look at how these indexes have typically behaved in bear markets to get a better historical perspective.

We can see in the chart below that far from being overbought, the Top 5 stocks are underperforming where they have normally been at this point in a bear market.

We can also see that the residual index is pretty much in line with its historical bear-market performance. But around now it has typically started to rally.

Therefore, purely from a historical price perspective, the Top 5 stocks could continue to rally, taking the residual index with it.

This accords with the year-on-year series of the Top 5 index, which shows it in the process of bouncing from very oversold conditions, and looks to be overshooting.

It also chimes with the Nasdaq. That index has bounced almost 40% off its lows. But compared to historical bear markets it is, perhaps surprisingly, underperforming.

Markets have been incredibly resilient, to the point even a recession may not be biggest risk they face.

Anything could happen of course to upset the apple cart, but from a purely price-based historical perspective, there is little saying markets can’t just plow on for now.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 10:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SvyHpB5 Tyler Durden

WTI Extends Gains Above Pre-Saudi-Cut Levels As Biden Drains SPR For 10th Straight Week

WTI Extends Gains Above Pre-Saudi-Cut Levels As Biden Drains SPR For 10th Straight Week

Oil prices are holding overnight gains, back above pre-Saudi-cut levels, as a weaker dollar and stronger China imports data buoyed black gold bulls.

“There are many uncertainties, as usual, when it comes to the oil market, and if I have to pick the most important one it’s China,” International Energy Agency’s executive director Fatih Birol said in an interview with Bloomberg TV on Wednesday.

“Of more than 2 million barrels a day of growth we expect this year in global oil demand, 60% is set to come from China.”

Big builds for products reported by API overnight are not a good sign for demand but there was a modest crude draw.

API

  • Crude -1.71mm (+1.1mm exp)

  • Cushing +1.535mm

  • Gasoline +2.417mm (+200k exp) – biggest build since Feb 2023

  • Distillates +4.50mm (+1.0mm exp) – biggest build since Dec 2022

DOE

  • Crude -452k (+1.1mm exp)

  • Cushing +1.72mm

  • Gasoline +2.75mm (+200k exp) – biggest build since Feb 2023

  • Distillates +5.074mm (+1.0mm exp) – biggest build since Dec 2022

The official data confirmed API with a small Crude draw but large product builds…

Source: Bloomberg

For the 10th straight week, the Biden admin drained the SPR (-1.8mm barrels last week to a fresh 40-year low)…

Source: Bloomberg

US Crude Production rose last week to its highest since April 2020 despite US drilling activity is in free-fall and showing no signs of slowing. The number of active oil and gas drilling rigs has fallen by 59 in the last five weeks, after falling another 15 in the week to June 2 – all of which were oil-focused rigs

Source: Bloomberg

WTI was trading around $72.50 ahead of the official data and extended gains after…

Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Oil & Gas Analyst Fernando Valle concludes:  Oil prices have risen modestly, but are largely shrugging off Saudi Arabia’s additional 1 million barrel-a-day cut that takes effect in July and an extension of OPEC+’s voluntary reduction through 2024. Saudi Aramco followed by raising its official selling prices across the world, a decisive action to prop up OPEC+ revenue. These moves may not be enough to offset poor demand due to a slowing economy. The Logistics Managers’ Index reached a third-consecutive all-time monthly low in May. Meanwhile, McKinsey data show slowing credit card activity.

Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/07/2023 – 10:37

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BsDUrcR Tyler Durden